Skip to main content

The Impact of Fiscal Crisis on Public Administration in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe

Abstract

This chapter outlines the responses of European governments to the recent fiscal crisis with special focus on the effects of crisis on public administration reforms. The empirical analysis relies upon an international comparative study of the responses of 14 European governments to the fiscal crisis in the period of 2008–2013. Findings show that fiscal crisis and public administration reforms are not necessarily closely connected, as the crisis intensified the pressure to reform public administration to some extent, but the European governments’ responses to crisis predominantly followed a combination of straightforward cutbacks and incremental change. More substantial reforms were carried out in countries most severely hit by the crisis and/or where administrative reforms were conditioned by the international financial assistance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • BĂ©land, D., & Cox, R. H. (Eds.). (2011). Ideas and politics in social science research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boin, A., t’Hart, P., Stern, E., & Sundelius, B. (2008). The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouvard, F., Dohrmann, T., & Lovegrove, N. (2009). The case for government reform now. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cepiku, C., & Savignon, A. B. (2012). Governing cutback management: Is there a global strategy for public administrations? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 25, 428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellepiane, S. (2012). The political power of economic ideas: The case of “Expansionary Fiscal Contraction”. Antwerp: ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mascio, F., Galli, D., Natalini, A., Ongaro, E., & Stolfi, F. (2017). Path-dependency and the changed European governance: Personnel reforms in coping with multiple crises in Italy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis‚ 19‚ 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drazen, A., & Grilli, V. (1993). Do crises induce reform? Simple empirical tests of conventional wisdom. Economics and Politics, 13, 129–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R., & von Hagen, J. (2009). Fiscal governance in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., Andrews, R., & Bezes, P. (Eds.). (2016). Public administration reforms in Europe: The view from the top. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardiman‚ N.‚ & MacCarthaigh‚ M. (2017). State retrenchment and fiscal consolidation in Ireland. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis‚ 19‚ 100–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, P. W., & Barrilleaux, C. (1983). Motivating government managers for retrenchment. Some possible lessons from the senior executive service. Public Administration Review, 43, 393–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, S. (2006). Downsizing, competition, and organizational change in government: Is necessity the mother of invention? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25, 875–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (2012). State responses to the fiscal crisis in Britain, Germany and the Netherlands. Public Management Review, 14, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015). Europe managing the crisis: The politics of fiscal consolidation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2015). Politics of fiscal consolidation in Europe: A comparative analysis. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 562–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. H. (1979). More on cutback management: Hard questions for hard times. Public Administration Review, 39, 179–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, C. H. (1984). Retrenchment, human resource erosion, and the role of the personnel manager. Public Personnel Management Journal, 13, 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “Muddling Through”. Public Administration Review, 19, 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, M., & Hood, C. (2012). Into an age of multiple austerities? Public management and public service bargains across OECD countries, Governance, 25, 79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Restoring public finances. Special issue of the OECD Journal on Budgeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Restoring public finances, 2012 update. Special issue of the OECD Journal on Budgeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, S. K. (2010). Cutback management and the paradox of publicness. Public Administration Review, 70, 564–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2001). From change to change: Patterns of continuing administrative reform in Europe. Public Organization Review, 1, 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G. (2011). Governance responses to the fiscal crisis: Comparative perspectives. Public Money and Management, 31, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2011). Global financial crisis, public administration and governance: Do new problems require new solutions? Public Organization Review, 11, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani-Ferry, J. (2007). Foreword. In J. Henriksson (Ed.), Ten lessons about fiscal consolidation (pp. 3–4). Brussels: Bruegel Lecture and Essay Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. (2010). Cuts and reforms—Public services as we move into a new era. Society and Economy, 32, 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform (3rd ed.). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, P., & Blöndal, J. (2012). Democracies and deficits: Prospects for fiscal responsibility in democratic nations. Governance, 25, 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, M. (2012). Still learning to speak and still not being heard: Public administration and the latest financial crisis. Administration & Society, 44, 367–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randma-Liiv, T., & Kickert, W. (2017). The impact of fiscal crisis on public administration reforms: Comparison of 14 European countries. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis‚ 19‚ 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudla, R., Randma-Liiv, T., & Savi, R. (2015a). Public sector financial and personnel management during cutbacks: Looking back at the literature of the 1970s and 1980s, Administrative Culture, 16, 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudla, R., Savi, R., & Randma-Liiv, T. (2015b). Cutback management literature in the 1970s and 1980s: Taking stock, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81, 433–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1996). Understanding economic policy reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 501–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompson, W. (2010). Reform beyond the Crisis. In OECD making reform happen: Lessons from OECD countries (pp. 11–38). Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toonen, T. (2012). Administrative reform: Analytics. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public administration (pp. 565–576). London: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vis, B., van Kersbergen, K., & Hylands, T. (2011). To what extent did the financial crisis intensify the pressure to reform the welfare state? Social Policy & Administration, 45, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J. P. (1986). City government productivity and civil service reforms. Public Productivity Review, 10, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, H., & Davis, B. (1980). Local government strategies to cope with fiscal stress. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tiina Randma-Liiv .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Randma-Liiv, T., Kickert, W. (2018). The Impact of Fiscal Crisis on Public Administration in Europe. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_47

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics