Abstract
New Public Management reforms in Europe, as elsewhere, heavily rely on performance indicators and targets. All corners of the public sector, from local to European and from policy formulation to management practice, have been affected. This focus on measurement fits well in a long tradition of measurement and state building. Yet, in recent years, disenchantment with performance management grows. More often than not, target regimes produce dysfunctional consequences. While the performance of performance target regimes is wanting, performance management is being reinvented. Rather than a system of accountability, performance management should prompt learning and dialogue. Performance management as a learning system may well be the next idea whose time has come.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
Bauer, R. A. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bernstein, D., & Isackson, N. (2014). The truth about Chicago’s crime rates: Part 2. Chicago magazine. Consulted from http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/June-2014/Chicago-crime-statistics/. Accessed 19 May 2016.
Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84, 517–538.
Blinder, A. (2015). Atlanta educators convicted in school cheating scandal. The New York Times. New York. Consulted from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/02/us/verdict-reached-in-atlanta-school-testing-trial.html?_r=2. Accessed 1 April 2016.
Bohte, J., & Meier, K. J. (2000). Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating. Public Administration Review, 60, 173–182.
Bouckaert, G., & Balk, W. (1991). Public productivity measurement: Diseases and cures. Public Productivity & Management Review, 15, 229–235.
Bouckaert, G., & Peters, B. G. (2002). Performance measurement and management: The Achilles’ heel in administrative modernization. Public Performance & Management Review, 25, 359–362.
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies, 3, 613–632.
Bulmer, M., Bales, K., & Sklar, K. K. (1991). The social survey in historical perspective, 1880–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buti, M., & Carnot, N. (2012). The EMU debt crisis: Early lessons and reforms. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50, 899–911.
Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). Transcending New Public Management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Christensen, T., Laegreid, P., & Wise, L. R. (2002). Transforming administrative policy. Public Administration, 80, 153–178.
Common, R. (2004). Organisational learning in a political environment. Policy Studies, 25(1), 35–49.
Courty, P., & Marschke, G. (2007). Making government accountable: Lessons from a federal job training program. Public Administration Review, 65, 904–916.
Curristine, T. (2005). Performance information in the budget process: Results of OECD 2005 questionnaire. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 5, 54.
De Bruijn, H. (2002). Performance measurement in the public sector: Strategies to cope with the risks of performance measurement. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 15.
De Jong, M. (2016). Why agencies budget for results. Erasmus University Rotterdam. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/79334.
De Jong, M., Van Beek, I., & Posthumus, R. (2013). Introducing accountable budgeting: Lessons from a decade of performance-based budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 12, 1–34.
Desrosières, A. (1998). The politics of large numbers: A history of statistical reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.
European Commission. (2000). The Lisbon European council—An agenda of economic and social renewal for Europe: Contribution of the European Commission to the special European Council in Lisbon, 23–24th March 2000. Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Brussels: European Commission.
Ferlie, E. (1996). The New Public Management in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frederik, J. (2016). Wachttijden verkorten? Verander gewoon de definitie even. De Correspondent. https://decorrespondent.nl/3922/Wachttijden-verkorten-Verander-gewoon-de-definitie-even/443729232298-2d59ca7e.
Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (2013). The third way and its critics. London: Wiley.
Gilson, C., Dunleavy, P., & Tinkler, J. (2009). Organizational learning in government sector organizations: Literature review. London: LSE Public Policy Group (PPG).
Goodsell, C. T. (1994). The case for bureaucracy. London: Chatham House Publishers.
Gore, A. (1993). From red tape to results: Creating a government that works better & costs less. Report of the national performance review. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Greve, C. (2007). Contracting for Public Services. London: Routledge.
Greve, C., Flinders, M., & Van Thiel, S. (1999). Quangos—What’s in a name? Defining Quangos from a comparative perspective. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 12, 129–146.
Grieves, J. (2008). Why we should abandon the idea of the learning organization. The Learning Organization, 15, 463–473.
Grizzle, G. A. (2002). Performance measurement and dysfunction: The dark side of quantifying work. Public Performance & Management Review, 25, 363–369.
Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hoffmann, C. (2016). At a crossroads—How to change ways towards more meaningful performance management? Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3–19.
House of commons public administration select committee. (2003). On target? Government by measurement. London: The Stationary Office.
Jilke, S. (2015). Choice and equality: Are vulnerable citizens worse off after liberalization reforms? Public Administration, 93, 68–85.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action Harvard Business School Press. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Kettl, D. F. (2002). The transformation of governance. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Kickert, W. J. (2011). Public management reform in continental Europe: National distinctiveness. In The Ashgate research companion to New Public Management (pp. 97–112). Farnham: Ashgate.
Laegreid, P. (2000). Top civil servants under contract. Public Administration, 78, 879–896.
Lewis, J. M., & Triantafillou, P. (2012). From performance measurement to learning: A new source of government overload? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 597–614.
Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry: Executive summary. The Stationery Office.
Moynihan, D. (2005). Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Administration Review, 65, 203–216.
Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Moynihan, D. P. (2009). Through a glass, darkly: Understanding the effects of performance regimes. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 592–603.
Olejniczak, K., & Newcomer, K. (2014). Moving towards accountability for learning. In K. Olejniczak & S. Mazur (Eds.), Organizational learning. A framework for public administration (pp. 81–98). Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.
Ongaro, E. (2009). Public management reform and modernization: Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from Schoolhouse to State House and City Hall to the Pentagon. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
Pollitt, C. (2008). Time, policy, management: Governing with the past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-New Public Management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Premfors, R. (1998). Reshaping the democratic state: Swedish experiences in international perspective. Public Administration, 76, 141–159.
Radin, B. A. (2000). The government performance and results act and the tradition of federal management reform: Square pegs in round holes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 111–135.
Radin, B. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity, and democratic values. Wahington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Reich, R. (2015). How Goldman Sachs profited from the Greek debt crisis. The Nation. Consulted from http://www.thenation.com/article/goldmans-greek-gambit/.
Rogers, P. J., & Williams, B. (2006). Evaluation for practice improvement and organisational learning. In I. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practices (pp. 76–97). London, UK: SAGE.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18, 277–310.
Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010). A world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 69–89.
Van de Walle, S., & Roberts, A. (2008). Publishing performance information: An illusion of control? In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector. How it is used. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
Van Dooren, W. (2008). Nothing new under the sun? change and continuity in the 20th century performance movement. In W. Van Dooren & S. Van de Walle (Eds.), Performance information in the public sector. How it is used. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Van Thiel, S., & Leeuw, F. L. (2002). The performance paradox in the public sector. Public Performance and Management Review, 25, 267–281.
Verhoest, K. (2005). Effects of autonomy, performance contracting, and competition on the performance of a public agency: A case study. Policy Studies Journal, 33, 235–258.
Wiggins, A., & Tymms, P. (2002). Dysfunctional effects of league tables: A comparison between English and Scottish primary schools. Public Money & Management, 22, 43–48.
Wildavsky, A. (1969). Rescuing policy analysis from PPBS. Public Administration Review, 29, 189–202.
Williams, D. W. (2003). Measuring government in the early twentieth century. Public Administration Review, 63, 643–659.
Williams, D. W. (2004). Evolution of performance measurement until 1930. Administration Society, 36, 131–165.
Wittebrood, K., & Junger, M. (2002). Trends in violent crime: A comparison between police statistics and victimization surveys. Social Indicators Research, 59, 153–173.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Dooren, W., Hoffmann, C. (2018). Performance Management in Europe: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone?. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55268-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55269-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)