Abstract
This concluding chapter is a response to the chapters by Tom Sparrow and Paul J. Ennis. On the one hand, Sparrow argues that phenomenology is too vague to count as a coherent movement. On the other hand, Ennis argues that phenomenology has been surpassed by recent scientific explanations. The conclusions of Sparrow and Ennis are remarkably similar: phenomenology is ‘over’. In response, Bruce Ellis Benson argues that phenomenology has flourished precisely because of its adaptability, which is why it will flourish in the future. Further, while scientific explanations of phenomena are no doubt helpful, they do not make other explanations superfluous. Benson provides reasons to think that phenomenology will be influential in the twenty-first century and thus reports of its death are premature.
According to the Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, the ‘real’ quotation goes thus: ‘The report of my death was an exaggeration.’ As is well known, the quote is from Mark Twain, responding to newspaper reports of his death. But, in my title, I am working off the most oft-cited version of the quotation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benson, B.E. (2016). Have Reports of Phenomenology’s Death Been Greatly Exaggerated?. In: Simmons, J., Hackett, J. (eds) Phenomenology for the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55039-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55039-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55038-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55039-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)