Abstract
Soto introduces a curriculum change context in which national planners appeared to acknowledge the importance of stakeholder involvement, through organising formal consultations at local level, only to ignore the suggestions made. Consequently, curriculum goals did not fit contextual realities. Although the teacher was positive about the rationale for change, her implementation experiences were of working in isolation in an unsupportive school context, to try to achieve curriculum goals which were of little interest to her learners or their parents . Soto concludes by questioning the value of curriculum change initiatives that promote teaching approaches inconsistent with prevailing educational norms, without planning for the local awareness raising, and ongoing teacher development opportunities that could provide teachers with necessary ‘moral’ and practical support.
References
Al-Daami, K.K., and G. Wallace. 2007. Curriculum reform in a global context: A study of teachers in Jordan. Journal of Curriculum Studies 39 (3): 339–360.
Armendáriz, A.M. 2009. Bottom up processes in courses of study reform. In Proceedings of the 34th FAAPI conference. Teachers in action. Making the latest trends work in the classroom. APIBB, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
Banegas, D.L. 2011. From international coursebooks to teacher-produced materials. In Proceedings of the 36th FAAPI Conference. Communicative language teaching and learning revisited. What more than three decades of experience have taught us. APIT, Tucumán, Argentina.
Banegas, D.L. 2012. The challenges of CLIL implementation in EFL contexts. 21st BETA-IATEFL Annual International Conference. Ruse, Bulgaria.
Banegas, D.L. 2014. Democratizing didactic transposition: Negotiations between learners and their teacher in a secondary school. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 7 (2): 1–26.
Bax, S. 2002. The social and cultural dimensions of trainer training. Journal of Education and Teaching 28: 165–178.
Bax, S. 2003. The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal 57 (3): 258–287.
Borg, S. 2003. Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, believe, know and do. Language Teaching 36: 39–81.
Borg, S. 2006. Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.
Chacón, C.T. 2005. Teachers’ perceived efficacy among English as a foreign language teachers in middle schools in Venezuela. Teaching and Teacher Education 21 (3): 257–272.
Consejo General de Educación. 2008a. Documento 1 Sensibilización y compromiso. Gobierno de Entre Ríos.
Consejo General de Educación. 2008b. Documento 2 Curricular epistemológico. Gobierno de Entre Ríos.
Consejo General de Educación. 2008c. Informe Documento 2. Gobierno de Entre Ríos.
Consejo General de Educación. 2009. Documento 4 Evaluación. Gobierno de Entre Ríos.
Consejo General de Educación. 2011. Resolución Nº 3322. Anexo: Diseño curricular del Nivel de Educación Secundaria de Entre Ríos. Gobierno de Entre Ríos.
Croce, F. 2014, April 22. Por qué en la escuela pública nadie aprende inglés. MDZ. Available from https://tinyurl.com/hmex9gy.
Crystal, D. 2003. English as a global language, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curdt-Christiansen, X.L., and R.E. Silver. 2012. Educational reforms, cultural clashes and classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education 42 (2): 141–161.
Farrell, T.S.C., and S. Kun. 2008. Language policy, teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. Applied Linguistics 29 (3): 381–403.
Freeman, D. 2013. Teacher thinking, learning, and identity in the process of educational change. In Innovation and change in English language education, ed. K. Hyland and L.L.C. Wong Abingdon, 123–136. UK: Routledge.
Fullan, M. 2007. The new meaning of educational change, 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gao, X. 2008. Teacher’s professional vulnerability and cultural tradition: A Chinese paradox. Teaching and Teacher Education 24: 154–165.
Graddol, D. 2006. English next. Plymouth, UK: British Council.
Gvirtz, S. 2007. Education in Argentina: Past, present and future tendencies. Seminar John Fogarty proceedings. Available from: www.cei.gob.ar/userfiles/Gvirtz.pdf. Accessed on September 15, 2015.
Hargreaves, A. 1998. The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education 14 (8): 834–853.
Hayes, D. 2000. Cascading training and teachers’ professional development. ELT Journal 54 (2): 135–145.
Helale, G. M. López Barrios and E. Villanueva de Debat. 2009. Presentation, practice and consciousness raising of grammar structures in elementary EFL coursebooks. Proceedings of the 34th FAAPI Conference. Teachers in Action. Making the latest trends work in the classroom. APIBB, Bahía Blanca, Argentina.
Hiep, P.H. 2007. Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal 61 (3): 193–201.
Kennedy. 2013. Models of change and innovation. In Innovation and change in English language education.ed. K. Hyland and L.L.C. Wong. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Kiely, R. 2011. Understanding CLIL as innovation. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 1 (1): 153–171.
Levinson, B.A., J. Blackwood and V. Cross 2013. Recipients, Agents, or Partners? The Contradictions of Teacher Participation in Mexican Secondary Education Reform. Journal of Educational Change 14 (1).
López Barrios, M. and E.Villanueva de Debat. 2011. From Grammar Translation to CLT: A retrospective view of coursebooks produced in Argentina. Proceedings of the 36th FAAPI Conference. Communicative language teaching & learning revisited. What more than three decades of experience have taught us. APIT, Tucumán, Argentina.
Markee, N. 1997. Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKay, S. 2002. Teaching English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McKay, S. 2003. Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13 (1): 1–22.
Orafi, S.M.S., and S. Borg. 2009. Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System 37: 243–253.
Ouyang, H. 2000. One-way ticket: A story of an innovative teacher in mainland China. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 31 (4): 397–425.
Park, M., and Y. Sung. 2013. Teachers’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms and their implementation: What can we learn from the case of Korean elementary teachers? Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 15–33.
Pozzo, M.I. 2009. La enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras en Argentina. Diálogos Latinoamericanos 15: 10–33.
Ravelo, L.C. 2014. Demystifying some possible limitations of CLIL (content and language integrated learning) in the EFL classroom. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 7 (2): 71–82.
Sakui, K. 2004. Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. ELT Journal 58 (2): 155–163.
Smith, L.K., and S.A. Southerland. 2007. Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (3): 396–423.
Soto, M.A. 2011. Teachers’ beliefs and curriculum innovation uptake: Case studies of teachers in Argentina. Unpublished MA critical study, University of Leeds.
Soto, M.A. 2012. Teacher motivation and autonomy in curriculum change implementation. In Views on motivation and autonomy in ELT: Selected papers from the 37th FAAPI Conference, ed. Anglada, L. and D.L. Banegas. Bariloche: APIZALS Asociación de Profesores de Inglés de la Zona Andina y Línea Sur.
Soto, M.A. 2014. Post-method pedagogy: Towards enhanced context-situated teaching methodologies. In D.L. Banegas et al. English language teaching in the post-methods era: Selected papers from the 39th FAAPI Conference. Asociación de Profesores de Inglés de Santiago del Estero. E-Book. ISBN 978-987-24550-1-9.
Waters, A. 2009. Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching 42 (4): 421–458.
Wedell, M. 2003. Giving TESOL change a chance: Supporting key players in the curriculum change process. System 31: 439–456.
Wedell, M. 2005. Cascading training down into the classroom: The need for parallel planning. International Journal of Educational Development 25 (6): 637–651.
Wedell, M. (2009). Planning for educational change. London: Continuum.
Wedell, M., and A. Malderez. 2013. Understanding language classroom contexts. The starting point for change. London: Bloomsbury.
Woods, D. 1991. Teachers’ interpretations of second language curricula. RELC Journal 22 (2): 1–18.
Zappa-Hollman, S. 2007. EFL in Argentina’s schools: Teachers’ perspectives on policy changes and instruction. TESOL Quarterly 41 (3): 618–625.
Zembylas, M. 2003. Emotions and teacher identity: A post-structural perspective. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 9 (3): 213–238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soto, M.A. (2018). Imaginary Realities: Curriculum Change that Ignores Classroom Contexts. In: Wedell, M., Grassick, L. (eds) International Perspectives on Teachers Living with Curriculum Change. International Perspectives on English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54309-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54309-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54308-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54309-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)