Skip to main content

Welfare, Inequality, and Marketization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Welfare and Inequality in Marketizing East Asia

Part of the book series: Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy ((PEPP))

  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

Contending perspectives on marketization and its contributions to welfare and inequality reflect divergent assumptions about the nature of markets and the determination of welfare and inequality outcomes within them, even as the nature and significance of welfare and inequality are themselves the subject of debate. Addressing these themes, this chapter establishes baseline understandings of welfare, inequality, and markets as they are understood across three broad but distinctive approaches to global and comparative political economy. These include: neo-classical political economy, so named for its practitioners’ commitment to ideas in neo-classical economics; critical political economy approaches, which draw on classical and contemporary critiques of classical and neo-classical economics; and, statist perspectives which hold that under certain conditions states can promote economic growth, welfare, and egalitarian outcomes more effectively than would be possible following a simple market logic and are able to pursue goals independent of elite interests and of the interests of ‘capital’ and/or capitalists in particular. In so doing, the chapter shows how rival perspectives on global political economy inform three distinctive accounts of marketization and its effects on patterns of growth, welfare, and inequality on a world scale and correspondingly divergent normative claims about what should be done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 58.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Francisco A. Gallego, and James A. Robinson. “Institutions, Human capital, and Development.” Annual Review of Economics 6, no. 1 (2014): 875–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson. “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation.” American economic review 91, no. 5 (2001): 1369–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, Sabina, and James Foster. “Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement.” Journal of Public Economics, 95 (August 2011): 476–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, Alice H. Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Giovanni.The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, Jagdish, and Arvind Panagariya. Why Growth Matters: How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and the Lessons for Other Developing Countries. Vol. 120. New York: PublicAffairs, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, Martin. “Subjective Well-being Capabilities: Bridging the Gap Between the Capability Approach and Subjective Well-being Research.” Journal of Happiness Studies 15, no. 5 (2014): 1197–1217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonefeld, Werner. Critical Theory and the Critique of Political Economy: On Subversion and Negative Reason. New York and London: Bloomsbury, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, François, and Satya R. Chakravarty. “The Measurement of Multidimensional Poverty.” Journal of Economic Inequality, 1 (April 2003): 25–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Richard, and Tak-Wing Ngo, eds. Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective. London and New York: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Robert. “Are There Laws of Motion of Capitalism?” Socio-Economic Review, 9 (2011): 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael. “Two Methods in Search of Science: Skocpol Versus Trotsky.” Theory and Society, 18 (1989): 759–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex. Imperialism and Global Political Economy. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammack, Paul. ‘State, Foreign Trade, World Market’: A Marxist Perspective on Contemporary Global Politics, 2013, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammack, Paul. “The UNDP, the World Bank and Human Development Through the World Market.” Development Policy Review 35, no. 1 (2017): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Toby, and Darryl S. Jarvis, eds. Asia After the Developmental State: Disembedding Autonomy. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centeno, Miguel A., Atul Kohli, and Deborah J. Yashar. “Unpacking States in the Developing World: Capacity, Performance, and Politics.” In States in the Developing World, edited by Miguel A. Centeno, Atul Kholi, and Deborah J. Yashar, 1–34. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny, Philip G. “Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization.” Government and Opposition, 32 (April 1997): 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, Anjan, Anup K. Dhar, and Byasdeb Dasgupta. “The Word and the World of Neo-Liberalism.” In The Indian Economy in Transition: Globalization, Capitalism and Development, 98–144. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139879309.006.

  • Chang, Ha-Joon. Kicking Away the Ladder: Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Angus. The Great Escape: Heatlh, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, David, and Aart Kraay. “Trade, Growth, and Poverty.” The Economic Journal, 114 (February 2004): F22–F49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, Len, and Ian Gough. A Theory of Human Need. London: Macmillan, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, Richard A. “Feeding the Illusion of Growth and Happiness: A Reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven.” Social Indicators Research, 74 (December 2005): 429–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, William. “The Anarchy of Success.” New York Review of Books, 56 (October 2009). http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2009/10/08/the-anarchy-of-success/, accessed November 30, 2016.

  • Ebner, Alexander. “Marketization: Theoretical Reflections Building on the Perspectives of Polanyi and Habermas.” Review of Political Economy 27, no. 3 (2015): 369–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter B. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter B., Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter, and Patrick Heller. “Human Development, State Transformation and the Politics of the Developmental State.” The Oxford Handbook of Transformation of the State, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter, and Patrick Heller. “Human Devlopment, State Transformation, and the Politics of the Developmental State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State, edited by Stephen Leibfried, Evelyne Huber, Matthew Lange, Johan D. Levy, Frank Nullmeier, and John D. Stephens, 691–713. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter, Evelyne Huber, and John D. Stephens. “The Political Foundations of State Effectiveness.” In States in the Developing World, edited by Miguel A. Centeno, Atul Kholi, and Deborah J. Yashar, 380–408. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James. Global Shadows: Africa in the Neoliberal World Order. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Carter, Aidan. “From Rostow to Gunder Frank: Conflicting Paradigms in the Analysis of Underdevelopment.” World Development 4, no. 3 (1976): 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, John Bellamy, and Michael D. Yates. “Piketty and the Crisis of Neoclassical Economics.” New York. Monthly Review, 66 (November 2014): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. Human Rights in Another Key. Polity Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, Alexander. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert. The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, Herbert. Individuality and Entanglement: The Moral and Material Bases of Social Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Pinelopi K., and Nina Pavcnik. “Trade, Inequality, and Poverty: What Do We Know? Evidence from Recent Trade Liberalization Episodes in Developing Countries.” Journal of International Economics, 66 (May 2005): 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, Ian, and J. Allister McGregor, eds. Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunberg, Isabelle. “Double Jeopardy: Globalization, Liberalization and the Fiscal Squeeze.” World Development 26, no. 4 (1998): 591–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. “Tracing the Progress of Process Tracing.” European Political Science 12, no. 1 (2013): 20–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmes, Adam. “Neoliberalism and Multilevel Governance.” Review of International Political Economy, 13 (2006): 725–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. “Neoliberalism Is a Political Project.” Jacobin Magazine, (July 23, 2016). https://www.jacobinmag.com/2016/07/david-harvey-neoliberalism-capitalism-labor-crisis-resistance/, accessed November 30, 2016.

  • Hirschmann, Albert O., and American Council of Learned Societies. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. ACLS Humanities E-Book. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacks, David, Christopher Meissner, and Dennis Novy. “Trade Costs, 1870–2000.” American Economic Review 98, no. 2, Papers & Proceedings (May 2008): 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasuriya, Kanishka, and Kevin Hewison. “The Antipolitics of Good Governance.” Critical Asian Studies, 36 (2004): 571–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Yun Tae. “Neoliberalism and the Decline of the Developmental State.” Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29 (1999): 441–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klasen, Stephan. 2010. Measuring and Monitoring Inclusive Growth: Multiple Definitions, Open Questions, and Some Constructive Proposals. Asian Development Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/11540/1404.

  • Klasen, Stephan, Tobias Lechtenfeld, and Felix Povel. “A Feminization of Vulnerability? Female Headship, Poverty, and Vulnerability in Thailand and Vietnam.” World Development, 71 (2015): 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. “The Myth of Asia’s Miracle.” Foreign Affairs (1994): 62–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Can Theories be Refuted? Essays on the Duhem-Quine Thesis, edited by Sandra G. Harding, 205–259. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave, eds. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibfried, Stephan, Evelyne Huber, Matthew Lange, Jonah D. Levy, Frank Nullmeier, and John D. Stephens. The Oxford Handbook of Transformations of the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour M., and Hans L. Zetterberg. “3. A Comparative Study of Social Mobility, Its Causes and Consequences.” Political Research, Organization and Design 2, no. 1 (1958): 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, Friedrich. The Natural System of Political Economy. London and New York: Routledge, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Andrew J., ed. Business and Government in Industrializing Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, Kishore. “The Great Convergence and the Logic of One World.” New Perspectives Quarterly 30, no. 2 (2013): 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Deirdre N. The Secret Sins of Economics. Vol. 4. Chicago. Prickly Paradigm, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen. “Life in the Market is Good for You.” In Accepting the Invisible Hand: Market-Based Approaches to Social Economic Problems, edited by Mark D. White, 139–168. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——–. “The Formula for a Richer World? Equality, Liberty, Justice.” New York Times (September 2, 2016). https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/04/upshot/the-formula-for-a-richer-world-equality-liberty-justice.html?_r=0, accessed November 30, 2016.

  • Mcgrew, Anthony. “The Logics of Economic Globalization.” In Global Political Economy, edited by John Ravenhill, 4th edition, 275–311. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, Branko. “Global Income Inequality in Numbers: In History and Now.” Global Policy, 4 (May 2013): 198–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, Branko. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morduch, Jonathan. “Poverty and Vulnerability.” The American Economic Review 84, no. 2 (1994): 221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, David. “A Relational Approach to Durable Poverty, Inequality and Power.” Journal of Development Studies 46, no. 7 (2010): 1156–1178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave, Alan, ed. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Volume 4: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965. Vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, Eric A. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C., and Robert Paul Thomas. eds. The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge: University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Barry R. Weingast. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass C., John Joseph Wallis, and Steven B. Webb. In the Shadow of Violence: Politics, Economics, and the Problems of Development. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C., and Amartya Sen. The Quality of Life. WIDER Studies in Development Economics 08070588X. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, “Promoting Pro-poor Growth: Policy statement”, OECD, www.oecd.org/dac/povertyreduction/44244087.pdf, (2006).

  • Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time, 2nd paperback edition. Boston: Beacon Press, 1944 [2001].

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, Alejandro. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (August 1998): 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, Lant, Asep. Suryahadi, and Sudarno Sumarto. Quantifying Vulnerability to Poverty: A Proposed Measure, Applied to Indonesia. Policy Research Working Papers; 2437 097824372. Washington: World Bank, East Asia and Pacific Region, Environment and Social Development Sector Unit, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, Martin, and Shaohua Chen. “Measuring Pro-Poor Growth.” Economics letters 78, no. 1 (2003): 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. “Introduction: What Do We Learn from Country Narratives?” In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Narratives on Economic Growth, edited by Dani Rodrik, 1–22. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——–. One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions and Economic Growth. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——–. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science, New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, John E. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Jeffrey. The End of Poverty: How We Can Make it Happen in Our Lifetime. London: Penguin Books, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, Peter K. “One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in Global Production.” American Economic Review, 93 (June 2003): 686–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Business Cycles. Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. Socialism, Capitalism and Democracy. Harper and Brothers, 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Stiglitz, and Joseph E. Stiglitz. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge Classics 240182839. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, Benjamin. The Global Development Crisis. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. Development as Freedom. Oxford Press, 1999. doi: 10.1215/0961754X-9.

  • Shaffer, Paul. “Beneath the Poverty Debate: Some Issues.” IDS bulletin 27, no. 1 (1996): 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh, Anwar. Capitalism: Competition, Conflict, Crises. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. How Will Capitalism End?: Essays on a Failing System. London and New York: Verso, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teivainen, Teivo. Enter Economism, Exit Politics: Experts, Economic Policy and the Damage to Democracy. London: Zed Books, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, Göran. “An Age of Progress?” New Left Review, 99 (May–June 2016): 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurbon, Elizabeth. Developmental Mindset: The Revival of Financial Activism in South Korea. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. “Stratification and Inequality.” In Encyclopedia of Social History, edited by Peter N. Stearns, 943–949. New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ul Haq, Mahbub, and I. Kaul. “Human Development Report.” United Nations Development Programme (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, Marco HD, and Ineke Maas. “Historical Studies of Social Mobility and Stratification.” Annual Review of Sociology 36, no. 1 (2010): 429–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World System. New York: Academic Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. “Globalization and the Myth of the Powerless State.” New Left Review, I/225 (September–October 1997): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Martin. “The Prosperity Puzzle: Do Political Institutions Hold the Key to a Country’s Economic Success?” The Financial Times, (March 03), 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Jung-en. Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization. Studies of the East Asian Institute 822235102. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cumings, Meredith. The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. World Development Report 2002: Building Institutions for Markets. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. “What is Inclusive Growth?” World Bank Policy Note. Washington. World Bank, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. “What is Inclusive Growth?” Concept Note. No place. 2015. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTDEBTDEPT/Resources/468980-1218567884549/WhatIsInclusiveGrowth20081230.pdf, accessed October 1, 2015.

  • Wright, Erik Olin. Envisioning real utopias. Vol. 98. London: Verso, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin. “Metatheoretical Foundations of Charles Tilly’s Durable Inequality.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 42, no. 2 (2000): 458–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin. Understanding Class. London: Verso, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin. “The Shadow of Exploitation in Weber’s Class Analysis.” American Sociological Review, 67 (December 2002): 832–853.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——–. “The Class Analysis of Poverty.” International Journal of Health Services, 25 (January 1995): 85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Alwyn. “The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, no. 3 (1995): 641–680.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan D. London .

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

London, J.D. (2018). Welfare, Inequality, and Marketization. In: Welfare and Inequality in Marketizing East Asia. Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54106-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics