Skip to main content

Bank Diversification and Financial Conglomerates in Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of European Banking

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the bank diversification into non-banking activities focusing on European conglomerates, while at the same time offering an update of studies on bank diversification. The financial conglomerates’ journey can be split in two periods by using the late 1990s as the cut off point. The chapter starts by discussing the corporate structure of financial conglomerates and then presenting the driving forces behind the evolution of these heterogeneous institutions. Then it moves on to review the theoretical arguments behind the creation of these universal banks and supports the discussion by presenting the empirical findings on the effects of product diversification in the banking sector. Finally, the discussion delves into the evolution of bank diversification into non-banking activities, while offering key statistics and a summary of key regulatory reforms. The chapter concludes the discussion by laying out some aspects of modern financial markets that require further thought and could ignite new research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We adopt the definition of financial conglomerates/universal banks of Vander Vennet (2002). The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Joint Forum on Financial Conglomerates offer similar definitions. The latter defines financial conglomerates as “any group of companies under common control whose exclusive or predominant activities consist of providing significant services in at least two different financial sectors (banking, securities, insurance)”.

  2. 2.

    During the 2007 financial crisis, co-movement among financial intermediaries’ assets and liabilities distorted the supply of capital and significantly disrupted the economic system. Such systemic failure is usually attributable to (a) common asset shock (for example, mortgages, equities and so on), (b) contagion (for example, investors’ psychology, panic and so on) and/or (c) interconnected financial intermediaries and to their funding maturity (Allen et al. 2012).

  3. 3.

    The US response came through the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 with the UK following with the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act in 2013. The EU, a long-established hub for universal banks and financial conglomerates, is currently engaged in a decisive overhaul of bank regulation and supervision.

  4. 4.

    Michel Barnier, Commissioner for internal market and services, set up a High-level Expert Group and appointed Erkki Liikanen, Governor of the Bank of Finland and a former member of the European Commission, as Chairman. The group’s mandate was to assess the need for structural reform of the EU banking sector. Commissioner Barnier added among others: “The proposed measures will further strengthen financial stability and ensure taxpayers do not end up paying for the mistakes of banks…The proposals are carefully calibrated to ensure a delicate balance between financial stability and creating the right conditions for lending to the real economy, particularly important for competitiveness and growth”. See European Commission’s pages on Structural Reform of the EU Banking Sector.

  5. 5.

    The overlap in the two sectors is even more apparent in modern capital markets, where products extensively used by banks, such as credit-default swaps, closely resemble a casualty insurance policy; albeit without either an insurable-interest requirement or any role for an insurance adjuster.

  6. 6.

    Different types of combinations took place. (1) Bank acquisitions of life insurers (for example, Lloyds Bank and Abbey Life, UK; Rabobank and Interpolis, Netherlands). (2) Mergers of banks and insurers (for example, Nationale-Nederlanden and NMB Postbank, Netherlands). (3) Joint ventures (for example, Generale Bank and AC Group, Belgium; RBS and Scottish Equitable, UK). (4) Banks establishing life insurance subsidiaries (for example, Deutsche Bank, Germany; Crédit Agricole, France). (5) Insurers acquiring banks (for example, GAN and CIC in France). (6) Insurers establishing banks (for example, Mapfre, Spain; Baltica, Denmark). (7) Distribution agreements often supported by cross-shareholdings (for example, Generali and Mediobanca, Italy; Allianz and Dresdner Bank, Germany).

  7. 7.

    In the EU, the Second Banking Directive of 1989 legally endorsed universal banking; whilst the 1999 Financial Services Modernization Act (FSMA) ended over 50 years the functional separation of commercial banking and investment banking in the US. Less than a decade later, the sub-prime crisis ignited and the global economy headed into the worst recession since the 1930s, which ironically was when the USA and others implemented functional separation as a means to ensure financial stability.

  8. 8.

    Shoots of recovery started to emerge in 2013. See “Financial conglomerates and theoretical arguments” for more details.

  9. 9.

    Merck Martel et al. (2012) classify large internationally active banks into two specialized business models (commercial banks; investment banks) and two universal business models (investment banking oriented universal banks; commercial banking oriented universal banks) based mainly on bank asset and funding structures.

  10. 10.

    In 1999, the G7 created the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) to consider likely problems arising from the wind-up of a large, financial conglomerate. A Group of Ten Report (2001) later considered the potential problems associated with the growth of financial conglomerates.

  11. 11.

    Of the 16 LCFIs, 13 remain. Lehman Brothers is the most notable casualty. Merrill Lynch is now part of Bank of America. Just before the crisis, a consortium of banks bought ABN AMRO including RBS, which the UK government later had to nationalize. Morgan Stanley converted from securities firm to a bank. Other LCFIs had to be supported by their governments in both the US and Europe.

  12. 12.

    Kane (1988) uses the term ‘regulatory dialectic’ to describe the cyclical interactions between regulation, regulatory avoidance and re-regulation, or de-regulation. It is also worth noting that these reforms are usually based on a de jure implementation. There is evidence, however, of a de facto structure in some European markets that existed for decades (Kalotychou and Staikouras 2007).

  13. 13.

    Allen and Santomero (2001) find that banks located in countries with highly developed financial markets, such as the USA and UK, are losing market share to finance companies, mutual funds and securities markets, which contrasts to the experience of banks in Germany, France and Japan. Walter (2009) documents a more prominent decline in commercial banks’ share of financial flows in the US than in the EU.

  14. 14.

    The US Department of Labor defines BHCs as “establishments primarily engaged in holding or owning the securities of banks for the sole purpose of exercising some degree of control over the activities of bank companies whose securities they hold.”

  15. 15.

    Goddard et al. (2007) provide an extensive list of key European legislative changes that have facilitated the integration of European banking and financial markets. Goddard et al. (2010) and Andriosopoulos et al. (2015) discuss legislative and regulatory developments in the EU (15 member states) and US banking industries, respectively.

  16. 16.

    Statistics are provided for the EU (28 member states), 5 candidate countries for EU membership (Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, and Turkey), 1 potential candidate country for accession in the EU (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and 17 other European and/or transcontinental countries/states (Andorra, Belarus, Faroe Islands, Georgia, Greenland, Guernsey, Iceland, Isle of Man, Jersey, Liechtenstein, Moldova, Monaco, Norway, the Russian Federation, San Marino, Switzerland, and Ukraine). Note, only countries/states that hosted bidder and/or target banks involved in M&A during the sample period are included. We source data from Thomson Financial.

  17. 17.

    In 2007, the value of bank–securities deals stood at USD 31.3 billion, that is, a ninefold increase on 2006.

  18. 18.

    Brunnermeier et al. (2012) report that the average (value-weighted) ratio of non-interest income-to-net interest income for US banks had increased approximately from 0.5 in 2000 to 1.5 in 2007.

  19. 19.

    http://ec.europa.eu/finance/financial-conglomerates/index_en.htm

References

  • Acharya, V. V. (2009). A theory of systemic risk and design of prudential bank regulation. Journal of Financial Stability, 5, 224–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2010). The changing nature of financial intermediation and the financial crisis of 2007–2009. Annual Review of Economics, 2, 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L., & Jagtiani, J. (2000). The risk effects of combining banking, securities, and insurance activities. Journal of Economics and Business, 52, 485–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., & Santomero, A. M. (2001). What do financial intermediaries do? Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L., Babus, A., & Carletti, E. (2012). Asset commonality, debt maturity and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 104, 519–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amel, D., Barnes, C., Panetta, F., & Salleo, C. (2004). Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: A review of the international evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28, 2493–2519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriosopoulos, K., Chan, K. K., Dontis-Charitos, P., & Staikouras, S. K. (2016). Wealth and risk implications of the Dodd-Frank Act on the U.S. financial intermediaries. Journal of Financial Stability, forthcoming, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2016.09.006

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayadi, R., & De Groen, W. P. (2016). Banking business models in Europe. In T. Beck & B. Casu (Eds.), Handbook of European Banking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baele, L., De Jonghe, O., & Vander Vennet, R. (2007). Does the stock market value bank diversification? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 1999–2023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J. R., Brumbaugh, R. D., & Wilcox, J. A. (2000). Policy watch: The repeal of Glass-Steagall and the advent of broad banking. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14, 191–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1982). Contestable markets: An uprising in the theory of industry structure. The American Economic Review, 72, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCBS (2011) Global systemically important banks: Assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement—Rules text. BIS, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benston, G. J. (1994). Universal banking. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 121–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. (2003). The economic effects of technological progress: Evidence from the banking industry. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35, 141–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Hunter, W. C., & Timme, S. G. (1993). The efficiency of financial institutions: A review and preview of research past, present and future. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 221–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Humphrey, D. B., & Pulley, L. B. (1996). Do consumers pay for one-stop banking? Evidence from an alternative revenue function. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 1601–1621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Demsetz, R. S., & Strahan, P. E. (1999). The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future. Journal of Banking and Finance, 23, 135–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., DeYoung, R., & Udell, G. (2001). Efficiency barriers to the consolidation of the European financial services industry. European Financial Management, 7, 117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., & Zhou, M. (2010). The effects of focus versus diversification on bank performance: Evidence from Chinese banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1417–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, F., Miller, M. H., & Posner, R. A. (1978). An approach to the regulation of bank holding companies. Journal of Business, 51, 379–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boot, A. W. A., & Schmeits, A. (2000). Market discipline and incentive problems in conglomerate firms with applications to banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 240–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. H., & Graham, S. L. (1986). Risk, regulation, and bank holding company expansion into nonbanking. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Quarterly Review, 10(2), 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. H., & Graham, S. L. (1988). The profitability and risk effects of allowing bank holding companies to merge with other financial firms: A simulation study. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Quarterly Review, 12(2), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. H., Graham, S. L., & Hewitt, R. S. (1993). Bank holding company mergers with nonbank financial firms: Effects on the risk of failure. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, E. (1989). Relationship between bank holding company risk and non-bank activity. Journal of Economics and Business, 41, 337–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, E., Fortier, D., & Pavel, C. (1988). Bank risk from nonbank activities. Economic Perspectives, 12, 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, M.K., Dong, G.N., & Palia, D. (2012). Banks’ non-interest income and systemic risk. AFA 2012 Chicago meetings paper. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1786738.

  • Buch, C. M., & DeLong, G. L. (2009). Banking globalization: International consolidation and mergers in banking. In A. N. Berger, P. Molyneux, & J. O. S. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of banking (pp. 508–530). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carletti, E., & Leonello, A. (2016). Regulatory reforms in the European banking sector. In T. Beck & B. Casu (Eds.), Handbook of European banking. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carow, K. A., & Kane, E. J. (2002). Event-study evidence of the value of relaxing longstanding regulatory restraints on banks, 1970–2000. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 439–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu, B., & Girardone, C. (2004). Financial conglomeration: Efficiency, productivity and strategic drive. Applied Financial Economics, 14, 687–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu, B., Dontis-Charitos, P., Staikouras, S. K., & Williams, J. (2016). Diversification, size and risk: The case of bank acquisitions of nonbank financial firms. European Financial Management, 22, 235–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. E., & Lynge, M. J. (1994). An empirical examination of scale and scope economics of U.S. savings banks. American Business Review, 12, 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X. (2007). Banking deregulation and credit risk: Evidence from the EU. Journal of Financial Stability, 2, 356–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, J. T. S., & Surti, J.. (2011). Making banks safer: Can Volcker and Vickers do it? IMF WP/11/236.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jonghe, O. (2010). Back to the basics in banking? A micro-analysis of banking system stability. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19, 387–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jonghe, O., Diepstraten, M., & Schepens, G. (2015). Banks’ size, scope and systemic risk: What role for conflicts of interest? Journal of Banking and Finance, 61, S3–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, R., Evanoff, D., & Molyneux, P. (2009). Mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions: A review of the post-2000 literature. Journal of Financial Services Research, 36, 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dontis-Charitos, P., Molyneux, P., & Staikouras, S. K. (2011). Does the stock market compensate banks for diversifying into the insurance business? Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 20, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elyasiani, E., Staikouras, S.K., & Dontis-Charitos, P. (2016). Cross-industry product diversification and contagion in risk and return: The case of bank-insurance and insurance-bank takeovers. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83, 681–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrella, A. (2001). Mixing and matching: Prospective financial sector mergers and market valuation. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 2367–2392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, L. P., Fraser, D. R., & Kolari, J. W. (2007). Is bancassurance a viable model for financial firms? Journal of Risk and Insurance, 74, 777–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M. J. (1999). Modernizing financial regulation: The relation between interbank transactions and supervisory reform. Journal of Financial Services Research, 16, 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambacorta, L., & van Rixtel, A. (2013). Structural bank regulation initiatives: Approaches and implications. BIS working papers no. 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genetay, N., & Molyneux, P. (1998). Bancassurance. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., Wilson, J. O. S., & Tavakoli, M. (2007). European banking: An overview. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 1911–1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2010). Banking in the European Union. In A. N. Berger, P. Molyneux, & J. O. S. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of banking (pp. 807–843). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heggestad, A. (1975). Riskiness of investments in non-bank activities by bank holding companies. Journal of Economics and Business, 27, 219–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R. J., & Carmassi, J. (2015). Complexity and systemic risk: What’s changed since the crisis? In A. N. Berger, P. Molyneux, & J. O. S. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of banking (2 ed., pp. 77–112). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring, R. J., & Santomero, A. M. (1990). The corporate structure of financial conglomerates. Journal of Financial Services Research, 4, 471–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoque, H., Andriosopoulos, D., Andriosopoulos, K., & Douady, R. (2015). Bank regulation, risk and return: Evidence from the credit and sovereign debt crises. Journal of Banking and Finance, 50, 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hryckiewicz, A., & L. Kozlowski (2015). Banking business models and the nature of financial crisis. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2557097

  • Hunter, W. C., Timme, S. G., & Yang, W. K. (1990). An examination of cost subaddivity and multiproduct production in large U.S. banks. Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 22, 504–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibragimov, R., Jaffee, D., & Walden, J. (2011). Diversification disasters. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalotychou, E., & Staikouras, S. K. (2007). De facto versus de jure bank-insurance ventures in the Greek market. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 32, 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. J. (1981). Accelerating inflation, technological innovation, and the decreasing effectiveness of banking regulation. Journal of Finance, 36, 355–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. J. (1988). Interaction of financial and regulatory innovation. American Economic Review, 78, 328–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, E. J. (2000). Incentives for banking megamergers: What motives might regulators infer from event-study evidence? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 32, 671–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, S.H. (2004) Banking consolidation. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, FRBSF Economic Letter, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, S. H., & E. S. Laderman (1999) On the portfolio effects of financial convergence—A review of the literature. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, FRSBS Economic Review, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laderman, E. S. (1999). The potential diversification and failure reduction benefits of bank expansion into nonbanking activities. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco working paper, No 2000-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2007). Is there a diversification discount in financial conglomerates? Journal of Financial Economics, 85, 331–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, G., & Welzel, P. (1996). Efficiency and technical progress in banking empirical results for a panel of German cooperative banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 20, 1003–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H., & Sarnat, M. (1970). Diversification, portfolio analysis and the uneasy case for conglomerate mergers. Journal of Finance, 25, 795–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lown, C.S., Osler, C.L., Strahan, P.E., & Sufi, A. (2000). The changing landscape of the financial services industry: What lies ahead? Federal Reserve Bank of New York,. Economic Policy Review, 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercieca, S., Schaeck, K., & Wolfe, S. (2007). Small European banks: Benefits from diversification? Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 1975–1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merck Martel, M., van Rixtel, A., & Mota, E. González. (2012). Business models of international banks in the wake of the 2007–09 global financial crisis. Estabilidad Financiera No. 22 (Bank of Spain).

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, P. (2016). Structural reform, too-big-to fail and banks as public utilities in Europe. In S. P. S. Rossi & R. Malavasi (Eds.), Financial crisis, bank behaviour and credit crunch (pp. 67–80). NewYork: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, P., Schaeck, K., & Zhou, T. M. (2014). ‘Too systemically important to fail’ in banking—Evidence from bank mergers and acquisitions. Journal of International Money and Finance, 49, 258–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A., & Stork, P. A. (2013). Bank size and systemic risk. European Financial Management, 19, 429–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilloff, S. J., & Santomero, A. M. (1998). The value effects of bank mergers and acquisitions. In Y. Amihud & G. Miller (Eds.), Bank mergers and acquisitions (Vol. 3, pp. 59–78). Boston/Dordrecht: The New York University Salomon Center Series on Financial Markets and Institutions.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Santomero, A. M., & Eckles, D. L. (2000). The determinants of success in the new financial services environment: Now that firms can do everything, what should they do and why should regulators care? Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Economic Policy Review, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, J. A. C. (1998). Commercial banks in the securities business: A review. Journal of Financial Services Research, 14, 35–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A., & Cornett, M. (2008). Financial institutions management: A risk management approach. NewYork: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A., & Walter, I. (1994). Universal banking in the United States: What could we gain? What could we lose? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, A. (1994) Banking and Commerce: An overview of the public policy issues. Journal of Banking and Finance, 18, 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staikouras, S. K. (2006). Business opportunities and market realities in financial conglomerates. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 31, 124–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, J. C. (1997). Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance, 52, 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J. (2004). Diversification in banking: Is noninterest income the answer? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, 853–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J. (2006). A portfolio view of banking with interest and noninterest activities. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 38, 1351–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J. (2015). Diversification in banking. In A. N. Berger, P. Molyneux, & J. O. S. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of banking (2 ed., pp. 219–243). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiroh, K. J., & Rumble, A. (2006). The dark side of diversification: The case of U.S. financial holding companies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 2131–2161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. (1999). The Darwinian shakeout in financial services. Long Range Planning, 32, 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallascas, F., & Hagendorff, J. (2011). The impact of European bank mergers on bidder default risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 902–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallascas, F., & Keasey, K. (2012). Bank resilience to systemic shocks and the stability of banking systems: Small is beautiful. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 1745–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vander Vennet, R. (2002). Cost and profit efficiency of financial conglomerates and universal banks in Europe. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 34, 254–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. (2008). The homogenization of the financial system and financial crises. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 17, 330–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W. (2010). Diversification at financial institutions and systemic crises. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19, 373–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, I. (1997). Universal banking: A shareholder value perspective. European Management Journal, 15, 344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, I. (2009). Economic drivers of structural change in the global financial services industry. Long Range Planning, 42, 588–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, G. N. F., Neumann, S., & Bostandzic, D. (2014a). Systemic risk and bank consolidation: International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 40, 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, G. N. F., Bostandzic, D., & Neumann, S. (2014b). What factors drive systemic risk during international financial crises? Journal of Banking and Finance, 41, 78–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (2001). New evidence on returns to scale and product mix among U.S. commercial banks. Journal of Monetary Economics, 47, 653–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. (2009). Are banks too big to fail? Measuring systemic importance of financial institutions. SSRN working paper, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546384

  • Zhou, C. (2013). The impact of imposing capital requirements on systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability, 9, 320–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Williams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

The authors are grateful to Thorsten Beck and Barbara Casu for their constructive feedback. Special thanks to Tuna Alkan for dedicated research assistance at the early stages of this study. The usual disclaimer applies.

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dontis-Charitos, P., Staikouras, S., Williams, J. (2016). Bank Diversification and Financial Conglomerates in Europe. In: Beck, T., Casu, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Banking. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52144-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52144-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52143-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52144-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics