Abstract
This section introduction considers some of the ethical debates generated by the creation of new reproductive technologies, and places these in historical perspective. It contrasts ethical debates which have shaped the development of research science and access to new technologies with literary and philosophical imaginings of the potential implications of reproductive technologies and what these might mean for infertile women and non-fertile couples. In doing so, it underlines the extent to which debates on infertility have always been grounded not only in current concerns, but have involved imagined futures for individuals and societies. The chapters in this section show that our reproductive futures are likely to remain bound not merely by our scientific capabilities, but by our social values. The ‘right’ to reproduce will remain mediated by complex and historically contingent factors. The troubled historical relationship between (wo)man, technology, and modernity is likely to remain a dominant trope, in media representations as much as our imaginations
Notes
- 1.
See, for example, John Jervis, Exploring the Modern: Patterns of Western Culture and Civilization (Oxford, 1998), chapter 8; Brian Ladd, The Ghosts of Berlin: Confronting German History in the Urban Landscape (Chicago, IL, 1997), chapter 3; Douglas Mackaman and Michael Mays (eds), World War I and the Cultures of Modernity (Jackson, MS, 2000); Angus McLaren, Reproduction by Design: Sex, Robots, Trees, and Test-Tube Babies in Interwar Britain (Chicago, IL, 2012).
- 2.
Anton Kaes, Shell Shock Cinema: Weimar Culture and the Wounds of War (Princeton, NJ, 2009).
- 3.
See, for example, ‘Experts Link Male Obesity to Infertility’, Evening Standard, 9 July 2008; ‘NHS Chief Warns Women not to Wait until 30 to have Baby as Country Faces a Fertility Timebomb’, Daily Mail, 30 May 2015; ‘Pollutants Linked to Lower Fertility in both Men and Women’, Time, 15 November 2012.
- 4.
Jervis, Exploring the Modern.
- 5.
Henry Beecher, ‘Experimentation in Man’, Southern Medical Journal, 6:6 (1959); Maurice Pappworth’s Human Guinea Pigs: Experimentation on Man (London, 1967).
- 6.
Jon Turney, Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture (New Haven, CT, and London, 1998).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, G., Loughran, T. (2017). Introduction: Reproductive Technologies and Imagined Futures. In: Davis, G., Loughran, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Infertility in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52080-7_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52080-7_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52079-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52080-7
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)