Abstract
The democracy movements of the occupations of public spaces since 2011, being critical of representation and identity, have invented and continue to invent a new form of democracy, for which Lorey proposes the term ‘presentist’. Presentist democracy does not mean simply the negation or the other side of political representation. ‘Presentist’ does not stand in a dichotomous relation to re-presentation; it emerges rather through a rupture with dualisms between refusal and engagement or consensus and conflict, by a break with identitarian confrontations between ‘us’ and ‘them’. In the midst of the presentist, the exodus opens up a breach for constituent processes that is directed to the emergence of new political subjectivations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
For instance, those of the Madrid collective Precarias a la deriva to cuidadanía, to a sociality based on concern (Precarias a la deriva, 2014).
Bibliography
Benjamin, W. (2003a). On the concept of history. In W. Benjamin, Selected writings, volume 4: 1938–1940. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Benjamin, W. (2003b). Paralipomena to ‘On the concept of history’. In W. Benjamin, Selected writings, volume 4: 1938–1940. Cambridge/London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Bensaïd, D. (2011). Permanent scandal. In G. Agamben et al. (Eds.), Democracy: In what state? New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press.
Butler, J. (1992). Contingent foundations: Feminism and the question of ‘postmodernism’. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political. New York/London: Routledge.
Crouch, C. (2004). Post-democracy. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume 1: An introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics: Second edition with and afterword by and interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1997). What is critique? In J. Schmidt (Ed.), What is enlightenment? Eighteenth-century questions and twentieth-century answers. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Foucault, M. (2007). The meshes of power. In J. W. Crampton & S. Elden (Eds.), Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2012). Declaration. New York: Argo Navis.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2008). Outlines of the philosophy of right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kouvelakis, S. (2007). Marx’s critique of the political: From the revolution of 1848 to the Paris Commune. Situations: Project of the Radical Imagination, 2(2), 81–93, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.gc.cuny.edu/index.php/situations/article/view/338/302. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
Lorey, I. (2011). Figuren des Immunen. Elemente einer politischen Theorie. Zürich/Berlin: Diaphanes.
Lorey, I. (2012). Demokratie statt Repräsentation. Zur konstituierenden Macht der Besetzungsbewegungen. In J. Kastner, I. Lorey, G. Raunig, & T. Waibel (Eds.), Occupy! Die aktuellen Kämpfe um die Besetzung des Politischen. Wien/Berlin: Turia + Kant.
Lorey, I. (2013a). On democracy and occupation: Horizontality and the need for new forms of verticality. In P. Gielen (Ed.), Institutional attitudes: Instituting art in a flat world. Amsterdam: Valiz.
Lorey, I. (2013b). Das Regime der Prekarisierung. Europas Politik mit Schuld und Schulden. In Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik (Ed.), Demokratie oder Kapitalismus? Europa in der Krise. Berlin: Edition Blätter.
Lorey, I. (2014a). Presentist democracy: Exodus and Tiger’s leap. Transversal Texts, 06, [Online]. Available: http://transversal.at/blog/Presentist-Democracy. Accessed 26 Nov 2015.
Lorey, I. (2014b). The 2011 occupy movements: Rancière and the crisis of democracy. Theory, Culture & Society Special Issue on Jacques Rancière, 31(7–8), 43–65.
Lorey, I. (2015). State of insecurity: Government of the precarious, with a Preface by J. Butler. London/New York: Verso.
Marx, K. (1975). Contribution to the critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law (1843/44). In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works, volume 3: 1843–1844. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1976). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852). In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works, volume 11: 1851–1853. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1986). The Civil war in France (1871). In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works, volume 22: 1870–1871. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1989). Critique of the Gotha Programme (1875). In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works, volume 24: 1874–1883. New York: International Publishers.
Marx, K. (1996). Capital: A critique of political economy (1867). In K. Marx & F. Engels, Collected works, volume 35. New York: International Publishers.
Mosès, S. (2009). The angel of history: Rosenzweig Benjamin, Scholem. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London/New York: Verso.
Nancy, J.-L. (2011). Finite and infinite democracy. In G. Agamben et al. (Eds.), Democracy: In what state? New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press.
Negri, A. (1999). Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state. Minneapolis/London: Minnesota University Press.
Precarias a la deriva. (2014). ‘Was ist dein Streik?’ Militante Streifzüge durch die Kreisläufe der Prekarität. Wien: transversal texts.
Raunig, G. (2007). Art and revolution: Transversal activism in the long twentieth century. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Raunig, G. (2016). Dividuum: Machinic capitalism and molecular revolution (Vol. 1). New York/Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
Sauer, B. (2011). ‘Only paradoxes to offer’? Feministische Demokratie- und Repräsentationstheorie in der ‘Postdemokratie’. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 2, 125–138.
Solidarity4all. (2012). [Online]. Available: http://www.solidarity4all.gr/sites/www.solidarity4all.gr/files/aggliko.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
Streeck, W. (2014). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. New York/London: Verso.
Virno, P. (2010). Exodus. Wien: Turia + Kant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lorey, I. (2016). Presentist Democracy: The Now-Time of Struggles. In: Oberprantacher, A., Siclodi, A. (eds) Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51659-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51659-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51658-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51659-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)