Skip to main content

Abstract

Imperialism, understood as a specific phase of capitalist development, was already widely discussed by Marxists in the Second International (1889–1914). Lenin, focused on revolutionizing Russia, was absent from these debates. He wrote Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism in 1916 in response to the implosion of the International after the outbreak of the First World War. Intended as a popular pamphlet, Imperialism is nevertheless based on intensive study primarily of the work of non-Marxist scholars and publicists. Lenin’s main target is Karl Kautsky’s theory of ultra-imperialism, which predicts the emergence of a transnational and pacific capitalism (a theme of contemporary debates about globalization). In insisting that geopolitical rivalries are not a mere policy option but are an inherent feature of capitalism in its most advanced form, Lenin makes one of his main innovations, the idea of uneven development, and identifies colonial revolt as a driving force of international socialist revolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See the outstanding edition of texts in Day and Gaido (2011) and for a more limited theoretical overview, Callinicos (2009, ch. 1).

  2. 2.

    Clark (2013) and Lieven (2015).

  3. 3.

    See, on Kautsky and the First World War, Steenson (1991: 177–201).

  4. 4.

    Löwy (1993), Kouvelakis (2007), and Krausz (2015). Neil Harding also argues that 1914 marked a major shift in Lenin’s theoretical analysis, although he puts less emphasis on the contribution made to this by his reading of Hegel and argues that the shift was already underway before the outbreak of war: Harding (2010).

  5. 5.

    See Lih (2011a), which compiles all Lenin’s comments on Kautsky between 1914 and 1924. The thesis of Lenin’s Kautskyism is strongly contested in Corr and Jenkins (2014). As they point out, Massimo Salvadori long ago argued that, pace Lenin, from the 1890s onwards, Kautsky consistently espoused parliamentary democracy as the inescapable framework of social progress: Salvadori (1979).

  6. 6.

    See my discussion of the hazards of Marx ’s own appropriation of Hegel in Callinicos (2014a).

  7. 7.

    For more discussion of the concept of epoch in Marxism, see Callinicos (2005).

  8. 8.

    Elsewhere, I have suggested that Lenin in fact intended to call the pamphlet Imperialism, the Latest Stage of Capitalism: Callinicos (2009: 44). But it seems pretty clear from the Notebooks that Lenin proposed such a title only as a second best to get around the Russian censorship: see the plan in CW 39: 230–239.

  9. 9.

    For example, Panitch and Gindin (2012); for the contemporary debate on Marxism and geopolitics, see the texts collected in Anievas (2010).

  10. 10.

    The “law of uneven development” was later used by Stalin and his followers to justify the idea of “Socialism in One Country,” an argument rebutted in Trotsky (1970).

  11. 11.

    See Callinicos (2009), esp. chs. 2, 5 and Callinicos (2014b).

  12. 12.

    See, on the nature of US hegemony , Panitch and Gindin (2012). Tooze (2014), argues that even the First World War and its aftermath promoted an abortive movement towards liberal imperialism in a study that is unusual in mainstream historical scholarship for its willingness to engage intellectually with Lenin and Trotsky.

  13. 13.

    For a more extensive discussion of the difficulties economic crises posed for the classical theorists of imperialism, see Callinicos (2009: 53–61).

  14. 14.

    See the comprehensive discussion in Post (2010).

  15. 15.

    For a contemporary Marxist interpretation of the Easter rising and its consequences, see Allen (2016, chs. 1–4).

  16. 16.

    See, for The Accumulation of Capital, Hudis (2015), the contemporary responses in Day and Gaido (2011, 676–752) and Kowalik (2014).

Bibliography

  • Althusser, Louis, 1969, For Marx (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Althusser, Louis, and Étienne Balibar, 1970, Reading Capital (London: NLB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Kieran, 2016, 1916: Ireland’s Revolutionary Tradition (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell, Norman, 1913 (1910), The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relations of Military Power to National Advantage (4th edn; New York: The Knickerbocker Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anievas, Alex, ed, 2010, Marxism and World Politics (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, Giovanni, 1978, The Geometry of Imperialism: The Limits of Hobson’s Paradigm (London: NLB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukharin, N I, 1972 (1917), Imperialism and World Economy (London: Merlin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex, 2005, “Epoch and Conjuncture in Marxist Political Economy”, International Politics, 42: 353–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex, 2009, Imperialism and Global Political Economy (Cambridge: Polity).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex, 2014a, Deciphering Capital: Marx’s Capital and Its Destiny (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, Alex, 2014b, “The Multiple Crises of Imperialism”, International Socialism, 2.144: 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Christopher, 2013, The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, Tony, 1975, Lenin, 1, Building the Party (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corr, Kevin, and Gareth Jenkins, 2014, “The Case of the Disappearing Lenin”, International Socialism, 2.144: 37–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, John, 2009, The Empire Project: The Rise and Fall of the British World System (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Richard B, and Daniel Gaido, 2011, eds, Discovering Imperialism: Social Democracy to World War I (Leiden: Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunayevskaya, Raya, 1971, Marxism and Freedom: From 1776 until Today (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Neil, 2010, Lenin’s Political Thought: Theory and Practice in the Democratic and Socialist Revolutions (Chicago: Haymarket).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri, 2000, Empire (Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Chris, 1968–1969, “Party and Class”, International Socialism, 1.35: 24–32, https://www.marxists.org/archive/harman/1968/xx/partyclass.htm.

  • Hilferding, Rudolph, 1981, Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J A, 1938 (1902), Imperialism: A Study (3rd edn.; London: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M C, and J E King, 1989, A History of Marxian Economics, 1 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, Peter, ed, 2015, The Complete Works of Rosa Luxemburg, II (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, Karl, 1909, The Road to Power (Chicago: Samuel A Bloch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, Karl, 2011a (1914), “Imperialism”, in Day and Gaido, 2011: 753–774.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, Karl, 2011b (1915), “National State, Imperialist State and Confederation”, in Day and Gaido, 2011: 791–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelakis, Stathis, 2007, “Lenin as a Reader of Hegel”, in Sebastian Budgen et al, eds, Lenin Reloaded: Toward a Politics of Truth (Durham NC: Duke University Press): 164–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowalik, Tadeusz, 2014 (1971), Rosa Luxemburg: Theory of Accumulation and Imperialism (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausz, Tamás, 2015, Reconstructing Lenin: An Intellectual Biography (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V I, 1964–1968, Collected Works (45 volumes, Moscow: Progress) (cited as CW).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, Dominic, 2015, Towards the Flame: Empire, War, and the End of Tsarist Russia (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lih, Lars, 2006, Lenin Rediscovered: What is to Be Done? in Context (Leiden: Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lih, Lars, 2009, “Lenin, Kautsky, and 1914”, http://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/784/lenin-kautsky-and-1914/.

  • Lih, Lars, 2011a, “Kautsky When He Was a Marxist”, http://www.historicalmaterialism.org/journal/online-articles/kautsky-as-marxist-data-base.

  • Lih, Lars, 2011b, ‘Lenin, Kautsky, and the “New Era of Revolutions”’, http://weeklyworker.co.uk/worker/895/lenin-kautsky-and-the-new-era-of-revolutions/.

  • Löwy, Michael, 1976, “Marxists and the National Question”, New Left Review, I/96: 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy, Michael, 1993 (1976), “From the ‘Logic’ of Hegel to the Finland Station,” in Changing the World: Essays in Political Philosophy from Karl Marx to Walter Benjamin (Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxemburg, Rosa, 2011 (1911), “Peace Utopias”, in Day and Gaido, 2011: 441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl, 2016, The Economic Manuscript of 1864–1865 (Leiden: Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, Avner, 1989, The First World War: An Agrarian Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, Leo, and Sam Gindin, 2012, The Making of Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of American Empire (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, Charles, 2010, ‘Exploring Working-Class Consciousness: A Critique of the Theory of the “Labour Aristocracy”’, Historical Materialism, 18:4: 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Richard, 2013, Saving the City: The Great Financial Crisis of 1914 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvadori, Massimo, 1979, Karl Kautsky and the Socialist Revolution 1880–1938 (London: NLB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandro, Alan, 2014, Lenin and the Logic of Hegemony: Political Practice and Theory in the Class Struggle (Leiden: Brill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steenson, Gary P, 1991, Karl Kautsky 1854–1938: Marxism in the Classical Years (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooze, Adam, 2014, The Deluge: The Great War and the Remaking of Global Order, 1916–1931 (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, L. D., 1970 (1929), The Third International after Lenin (New York: Pathfinder).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trotsky, L. D., 2011 (1915), “The Nation and the Economy,” in Day and Gaido, 2011: 873–884.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Callinicos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Callinicos, A. (2018). Lenin and Imperialism. In: Rockmore, T., Levine, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Leninist Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51650-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics