Skip to main content

Innovations in Qualitative Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore four particular ways in which innovation has pushed qualitative data collection beyond the familiar focus on face-to-face interviews. We have chosen these methods both for their practicality and because they are tools and techniques we have used ourselves; as committed qualitative researchers, we can attest to their value. First, we identify the way innovation has occurred in response to rapidly changing socio-technological contexts: adaptations and expansions of traditional modes of researching, such as interviewing and focus groups, to utilise the potential of the connected, online worlds we increasingly live in. Second, concurrent with, but not synonymous with, theoretical shifts that have argued against a focus just on ‘the text’, we discuss the blossoming of pluralistic or multi-modal forms of interviewing and focus group research. These two offer examples of how traditionally qualitative methods have expanded beyond their origins; the next two offer examples of techniques which have been released from their quantitative moorings: qualitative surveys offer researchers access to familiar forms of data—personal accounts, perspectives and so on—often conceptualised as ‘representing the self’, somehow; story completion tasks, in contrast, provide something radically different: a window into the social meaning worlds of our participants. Read on—we hope you are inspired!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, J., Rodham, K., & Gavin, J. (2005). Investigating the “self” in deliberate self-harm. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1293–1309.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, H., Brown, S. D., & Reavey, P. (2008). Vicarious and post-memory practices in adopting families: The re-production of the past through photography and narrative. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(5), 474–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. (2007). ‘You’ve made mistress very, very angry’: Displeasure and pleasure in media representations of BDSM. Participations, 4(1). Available: http://www.participations.org/Volume%204/Issue%201/4_01_barrett.htm

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Tricklebank, G., & Clarke, V. (2013). ‘It shouldn’t stick out from your bikini at the beach’: Meaning, gender, and the hairy/hairless body. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(4), 478–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridger, A. J. (2013). Psychogeography and feminist methodology. Feminism & Psychology, 23(3), 285–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., Cromby, J., Harper, D. J., Johnson, K., & Reavey, P. (2011). Researching “experience”: Embodiment, methodology, process. Theory & Psychology, 21(4), 493–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpiano, R. M. (2009). Come take a walk with me: The “go-along” interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place, 15(1), 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V. (2016). Wearing a gay slogan t-shirt in the higher education classroom: A cautionary tale. Feminism & Psychology, 26(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V. & Demetriou, E. (2016). “Not a big deal”?: Exploring the accounts of adult children of lesbian, gay and trans parents. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(2), 131–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Smith, M. (2015). “Not hiding, not shouting, just me”: Gay men negotiate their visual identities. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(1), 4–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., & Spence, K. (2013). ‘I am who I am’: Navigating norms and the importance of authenticity in lesbian and bisexual women’s accounts of their appearance practices. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(1), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., Braun, V., & Wooles, K. (2015). Thou shalt not covet another man? Exploring constructions of same-sex and different-sex infidelity using story completion. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., Moller, N., Tischner, I., & the Story Completion Research Group. (2017). Once upon a time...: Qualitative story completion methods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, A., & Rafalin, D. (2000). Jewish gay men’s accounts of negotiating cultural, religious, and sexual identity: A qualitative study. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12(4), 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, A., & Rafalin, D. (2001). Jewish gay men’s accounts of negotiating cultural, religious, and sexual identity: A qualitative study. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 12(4), 21–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K. (2012). Do you really need a methodology? QMiP Bulletin, 13, 59–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain, K., Cain, T., Sheridan, J., & Dupuis, A. (2011). Pluralisms in qualitative research: From multiple methods to integrated methods. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8(2), 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croghan, R., Griffin, C., Hunter, J., & Phoenix, A. (2008). Young people’s constructions of self: Notes on the use and analysis of the photo-elicitation methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 345–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S., & Smith, L. T. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2004). Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 455–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrheim, K., & Dixon, J. (2004). Attitudes in the fiber of everyday life: The discourse of racial evaluation and the lived experience of desegregation. American Psychologist, 59(7), 626–636.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emmel, N. & Clark, A. (2009). The methods used in connected lives: Investigating networks, neighbourhoods and communities. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Working Paper Series 06/09. Available: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/800/

  • Fassinger, R. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems, and promise: Grounded theory in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 156–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H. (2000). Focusing on sex: Using focus groups in sex research. Sexualities, 3, 275–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H. (2013). Accounting for orgasmic absence: Exploring heterosex using the story completion method. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(3), 310–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5(1), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2008). Dressing the body: The role of clothing in sustaining body pride and managing body distress. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(4), 249–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, F., Morris, M., & Rumsey, N. (2007a). Doing synchronous online focus groups with young people: Methodological reflections. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, F., Rumsey, N., & Morris, M. (2007b). “Ur skin is the thing that everyone sees and you can’t change it!”: Exploring the appearance-related concerns of young people with psoriasis. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 10(3), 133–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, H. (2005). The social construction of the child sex offender explored by narrative. The Qualitative Report, 10(3), 395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., & West, M. L. (2012). The adult attachment projective system, attachment theory and assessment in adults. New York: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2015). From mirroring to world-making: Research as future forming. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, F. (2007). Conducting focus groups with children and young people: Strategies for success. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(5), 473–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L. (2010a). Popular music and the life course: Cultural commitment, lifestyles and identities. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, L. (2010b). ‘Using email interviews’, ‘Realties’ Toolkit #09, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM). Available: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/1303/1/09-toolkit-email-interviews.pdf.

  • Giles, D. C., & Newbold, J. (2010). Self-and other-diagnosis in user-led mental health online communities. Qualitative Health Research, 21(3), 419–428.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D. (2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies, V., Harden, A., Johnson, K., Reavey, P., Strange, V., & Willig, C. (2005). Painting pictures of embodied experience: The use of nonverbal data production for the study of embodiment. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, K., & Frith, H. (2006). Deconstructing body image. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 79–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D., & Manning, R. (2014). ‘Oh my god, we’re not doing nothing’: Young people’s experiences of spatial regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 640–655.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D., Royall, B., & Malson, H. (2017). Hypothetically speaking: Using vignettes as a sand-alone qualitative method. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiney Yallop, J., Lopez de Vallejo, I., & Wright, P. (2008). Overview of the performative social science special issue. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2). Available: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/375

  • Hegarty, P. (2002). ‘It's not a choice, it's the way we're built’: Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12(3), 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2005). Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrell, B., Stephens, C., & Breheny, M. (2015). Online research with informal caregivers: Opportunities and challenges. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 258–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, N. (2008). Entering the blogosphere: Some strategies for using blogs in social research. Qualitative research, 8(1), 91–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2015). A report on an arts-led, emotive experiment in interviewing and storytelling. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, A. (2015). A case for using online discussion forums in critical psychological research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowett, A., & Peel, E. (2009). Chronic illness in non-heterosexual contexts: An online survey of experiences. Feminism & Psychology, 19(4), 454–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, C., & Powell, D. (1995). Engendering infidelity: Essentialist and social constructionist readings of a story completion task. Feminism & Psychology, 5(3), 345–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, J. A., & Testa, M. (2000). Qualitative analysis of women’s perceived vulnerability to sexual aggression in a hypothetical dating context. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17(6), 729–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, A. (2004). The internet as research context. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 358–374). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moller, N. P., Tischner, I. & Clarke, V. (forthcoming). Young people’s perceptions of fat therapists: “How can THAT help me?” Qualitative Research in Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M., Gibbs, S., Maxwell, K., & Britten, N. (2002). Hearing children's voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children. Qualitative Research, 2, 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison, T., Gibson, A. F., Wigginton, B., & Crabb, S. (2015). Online research methods in psychology: Methodological opportunities for critical qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, D. B., Lach, L., King, G., Scott, M., Boydell, K., Sawatzky, B.J., Reisman, J., Schippel, E. & Young, N. L, (2010). Contrasting Internet and face-to-face focus groups for children with chronic health conditions: Outcomes and participant experiences. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 105-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peel, E. (2010). Pregnancy loss in lesbian and bisexual women: An online survey of experiences. Human Reproduction, 25(3), 721–727.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(4), 281–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, A. I. (Ed.). (1981). Assessment with projective techniques. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reavey, P. (Ed.). (2011). Visual methods in psychology: Using and interpreting images in qualitative research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H., Lemkau, P., & Kronenberg, B. (1921/1998). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test based on Perception (10th Rev. ed.). Verlag, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, J., & Reavey, P. (2010). “He’s a good looking chap, ain’t he?”: Narrative and visualisations of self in body dysmorphic disorder. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1641–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solnit, R. (2001). Wanderlust: A history of walking. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanis, M. (2007). Online social support groups. In A. Joinson, K. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 139–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2013). To let hair be, or to not let hair be? Gender and body hair removal practices in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Body Image, 10(4), 599–606.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, G., & Braun, V. (2017). Short but often sweet: The surprising potential of qualitative survey methods. In V. Braun, V. Clarke, & D. Gray (Eds.), Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C., Wootten, A., & Robinson, P. (2013). The experiences of gay and bisexual men diagnosed with prostate cancer: Results from an online focus group. European Journal of Cancer Care, 22(4), 522–529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women's body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 69–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). Dunedin, NZ: University of Otago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. J., & Coyle, A. (2000). What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapy. Human Reproduction, 15(9), 2041–2051.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tuttas, C. A. (2015). Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 51(1), 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ommen, C., & Painter, D. (2005). Mapping East London: Sketching identity through place. South African Journal of Psychology, 35(3), 505–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, E., & Malson, H. (2010). Discursive constructions of eating disorders: A story completion task. Feminism & Psychology, 20(4), 529–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus groups in feminist research: Power, interaction, and the co-construction of meaning. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(1), 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanchar, S. C., Gantt, E. E., & Clay, S. L. (2005). On the nature of a critical methodology. Theory & Psychology, 15(1), 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M. L., DuBois, L. Z., Parsons, J. T., Prescott, T. L., & Mustanski, B. (2014). Online focus groups as an HIV prevention programme for gay, bisexual and queer adolescent males. AIDS Education and Prevention, 26(6), 554–564.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Key References

For an accessible and practical introduction to using many of the methods discussed in this chapter, including surveys and story completion, see: Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. London: Sage. The book also has a resource-rich companion website: www.sagepub.co.uk/braunclarke.

For a good introduction to online researching from a critical psychology perspective, see the special issue of Qualitative Research in Psychology (2015, Vol 13(2)), and the associated editorial which ‘sets the scene’: Morison, T., Gibson, A. F., Wigginton, B., & Crabb, S. (2015). Online research methods in psychology: Methodological opportunities for critical qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 223–232.

More details of the three example study methods—and the studies themselves—can be found here: Clarke, V., Braun, V. & Wooles, K. (2015) Thou shalt not covet another man? Exploring constructions of same-sex and different-sex infidelity using story completion. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(2), 153–166.

Gray, D., & Manning, R. (2014). ‘Oh my god, we’re not doing nothing’: Young people’s experiences of spatial regulation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 640–655.

Opperman, E., Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Rogers, C. (2014). “It feels so good it almost hurts”: Young adults’ experiences of orgasm and sexual pleasure. Journal of Sex Research, 51(5), 503–515.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Gray, D. (2017). Innovations in Qualitative Methods. In: Gough, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics