Skip to main content

Is there Room in Quantum Ontology for a Genuine Causal Role for Consciousness?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Quantum Models in Social Science

Abstract

Western philosophy and science have a strongly dualistic tradition regarding the mental and physical aspects of reality, which makes it difficult to understand their possible causal relations. In recent debates in cognitive neuroscience it has been common to claim on the basis of neural experiments that conscious experiences are causally inefficacious. At the same time there is much evidence that consciousness does play an important role in guiding behavior. The author explores whether a new way of understanding the causal role of mental states and consciousness could be provided by the ontological interpretation of the quantum theory (Bohm and Hiley, Phys. Rep. 144:323–348, 1987; Bohm and Hiley, The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Routledge: London, 1993). This interpretation radically changes our notion of matter by suggesting that a new type of active information plays a causal role at the quantum level of reality. The author thus considers to what extent the alleged causal powers of consciousness involve information, and then moves on to consider whether information in (conscious) mental states can be connected to the information at the level of quantum physics. In this way he sketches how quantum theory might help to throw light upon one of the grand challenges facing the social sciences and the humanities, namely the question of whether consciousness plays any genuine causal role in the physical world.

It may be said, indeed, that without bones and muscles and the other parts of the body I cannot execute my purposes. But to say that I do as I do because of them, and that this is the way in which the mind acts, and not from the choice of the best, is a very careless and idle mode of speaking. I wonder that they cannot distinguish the cause from the condition, which the many, feeling about in the dark, are always mistaking and misnaming. (Plato, The Phaedo)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmanspacher, H. (2011). Quantum approaches to consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/qt-consciousness/.

  • Baars, B. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacciagaluppi, G., & Valentini, A. (2009). Quantum theory at a crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “Hidden Variables” I and II. Physical Review, 85(2), 166–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1986). Time, the implicate order and prespace. In D. Griffin (Ed.), Physics and the ultimate significance of time: Bohm, Prigogine and process philosophy (pp. 177–208). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (1990). A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Philosophical Psychology, 3, 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (2003). Soma-significance and the activity of meaning. In L. Nichol (Ed.), The essential David Bohm (pp. 158–182). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1984). Measurement understood through the quantum potential approach. Foundations of Physics, 14(3), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1987). An ontological basis for quantum theory: I. Non-relativistic particle systems. Physics Reports, 144(6), 323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D., & Pylkkänen, P. (1992). Cognition as a movement toward coherence. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouwmeester, D., Ekert, A., & Zeilinger, A. K. (Eds.). (2000). The physics of quantum information: Quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, quantum computation. Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (1994). Past, space, and self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choustova, O. (2007). Toward quantum-like modeling of financial processes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 70, 012006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett, H. III (1957). “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reprinted In J. Wheeler & W. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (1983). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filk, T. (2012). Quantum-like behavior of classical systems. Quantum Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7620, 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flender, C., Kitto, K., & Bruza, P. (2009). Non-separability of shared intentionality. In P. Bruza, D. Sofge, W. Lawless, C. J. van Rijsbergen, & M. Klusch (Eds.), Quantum interaction. Third international symposium (QI 2009). Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 5494, pp. 211–224). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2015). Semantic conceptions of information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.), forthcoming URL, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/information-semantic/

  • Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel, C. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, S. (2013). Bohmian mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2013 ed.). URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/qm-bohm/

  • Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR theory’. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameroff, S., Gennaro, R., & Pylkkänen, P. (2014). HOT to DOT: A ‘Deeper-Order Thought’ theory of consciousness. In D. Chopra (Ed.), Brain, mind and cosmos [Ebook]. New York: Trident Media Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haven, E. (2005). Pilot-wave theory and financial option pricing. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 44, 1957–1962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiley, B. J., & Pylkkänen, P. (2005). Can mind affect matter via active information? Mind and Matter, 3(2), 7–26. http://www.mindmatter.de/resources/pdf/hileywww.pdf.

  • Holland, P. (2011). A quantum of history. Contemporary Physics, 52, 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, N. (1982). Consciousness regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khrennikov, A. (2004). Fundamental Theories of Physics Series: Vol. V. Information dynamics in cognitive, psychological and anomalous phenomena (p. 138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, K. (1977). Behind the mirror [Rückseite dyes Speigels] (R. Taylor, Trans.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleeh, R., & Amani, P. (2012). Bohm’s theory of the relationship of mind and matter revisited. NeuroQuantology, 10, 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroney, O. (2002). Information and entropy in quantum theory. PhD thesis, Birkbeck College, University of London. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/tpru/OwenMaroney/thesis/thesis.html

  • Maroney, O., & Hiley, B. J. (1999). Quantum state teleportation understood through the Bohm interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 29(9), 1403–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (2005). Dualism. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ney, A., & Albert, D. (Eds.). (2013). The wave function: Essays on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., & Tononi, G. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(5): e1003588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W. (1975). The mystery of the mind: A critical study of consciousness and the human brain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1892). The Phaedo. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pockett, S., Banks, W., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2006). Does consciousness cause behaviour? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylkkänen, P. (2007). Mind, matter and the implicate order (The Frontiers Collection). Heidelberg and New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pylkkänen, P. (2014). Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought? Mind and Matter, 12(1), 61–91. http://www.mindmatter.de/resources/pdf/pylkkaenen_www.pdf.

  • Pylkkänen, P., Hiley, B. J., & Pättiniemi, I. (2016). Bohm’s approach and individuality. In A. Guay & T. Pradeu (Eds.), Individuals across the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revonsuo, A. (2006). Inner presence: Consciousness as a biological phenomenon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revonsuo, A. (2015). Hard to see the problem? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(3–4), 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. (2008). Understanding naturalism. Durham, NC: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roederer, J. G. (2005). Information and its role in nature. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (1997). A theory of consciousness. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Güzeldere (Eds.), The nature of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (2009). Concepts and definitions of consciousness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic processing: Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Q. (2003). Why cognitive scientists cannot ignore quantum mechanics? In Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.), Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapp, H. (2005). Comment on Hiley-Pylkkanen paper. The Stapp files. http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/HileyPylkkanen.txt.

  • Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: Here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167.

  • Tuomela, R. (2013). Social ontology: Collective intentionality and group agents. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gulick, R. (2014). Consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 ed.). URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/consciousness/

  • Velmans, M. (1991). Is human information processing conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(4), 651–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walleczek, J., & Grössing, G. (2016). Nonlocal Quantum Information Transfer Without Superluminal Signalling and Communication. Foundations of Physics 46(9), 1208–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (1987). Meaning as being in the implicate order philosophy of David Bohm: A conversation. In B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat (Eds.), Quantum Implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science: Unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paavo Pylkkänen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pylkkänen, P. (2017). Is there Room in Quantum Ontology for a Genuine Causal Role for Consciousness?. In: Haven, E., Khrennikov, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Quantum Models in Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49276-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49276-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49275-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49276-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics