Abstract
Western philosophy and science have a strongly dualistic tradition regarding the mental and physical aspects of reality, which makes it difficult to understand their possible causal relations. In recent debates in cognitive neuroscience it has been common to claim on the basis of neural experiments that conscious experiences are causally inefficacious. At the same time there is much evidence that consciousness does play an important role in guiding behavior. The author explores whether a new way of understanding the causal role of mental states and consciousness could be provided by the ontological interpretation of the quantum theory (Bohm and Hiley, Phys. Rep. 144:323–348, 1987; Bohm and Hiley, The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Routledge: London, 1993). This interpretation radically changes our notion of matter by suggesting that a new type of active information plays a causal role at the quantum level of reality. The author thus considers to what extent the alleged causal powers of consciousness involve information, and then moves on to consider whether information in (conscious) mental states can be connected to the information at the level of quantum physics. In this way he sketches how quantum theory might help to throw light upon one of the grand challenges facing the social sciences and the humanities, namely the question of whether consciousness plays any genuine causal role in the physical world.
It may be said, indeed, that without bones and muscles and the other parts of the body I cannot execute my purposes. But to say that I do as I do because of them, and that this is the way in which the mind acts, and not from the choice of the best, is a very careless and idle mode of speaking. I wonder that they cannot distinguish the cause from the condition, which the many, feeling about in the dark, are always mistaking and misnaming. (Plato, The Phaedo)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, J. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Atmanspacher, H. (2011). Quantum approaches to consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/qt-consciousness/.
Baars, B. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bacciagaluppi, G., & Valentini, A. (2009). Quantum theory at a crossroads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bohm, D. (1952). A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of “Hidden Variables” I and II. Physical Review, 85(2), 166–193.
Bohm, D. (1986). Time, the implicate order and prespace. In D. Griffin (Ed.), Physics and the ultimate significance of time: Bohm, Prigogine and process philosophy (pp. 177–208). New York: State University of New York Press.
Bohm, D. (1990). A new theory of the relationship of mind and matter. Philosophical Psychology, 3, 271–286.
Bohm, D. (2003). Soma-significance and the activity of meaning. In L. Nichol (Ed.), The essential David Bohm (pp. 158–182). London: Routledge.
Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1984). Measurement understood through the quantum potential approach. Foundations of Physics, 14(3), 255–274.
Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1987). An ontological basis for quantum theory: I. Non-relativistic particle systems. Physics Reports, 144(6), 323–348.
Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London: Routledge.
Bohm, D., & Pylkkänen, P. (1992). Cognition as a movement toward coherence. Unpublished manuscript.
Bouwmeester, D., Ekert, A., & Zeilinger, A. K. (Eds.). (2000). The physics of quantum information: Quantum cryptography, quantum teleportation, quantum computation. Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer.
Campbell, J. (1994). Past, space, and self. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Choustova, O. (2007). Toward quantum-like modeling of financial processes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 70, 012006.
Everett, H. III (1957). “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reprinted In J. Wheeler & W. Zurek (Eds.), Quantum theory and measurement (1983). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Filk, T. (2012). Quantum-like behavior of classical systems. Quantum Interaction: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7620, 196–206.
Flender, C., Kitto, K., & Bruza, P. (2009). Non-separability of shared intentionality. In P. Bruza, D. Sofge, W. Lawless, C. J. van Rijsbergen, & M. Klusch (Eds.), Quantum interaction. Third international symposium (QI 2009). Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 5494, pp. 211–224). Berlin: Springer.
Floridi, L. (2015). Semantic conceptions of information. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2015 ed.), forthcoming URL, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/information-semantic/
Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gallistel, C. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ghirardi, G., Rimini, A., & Weber, T. (1986). Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Physical Review D, 34, 470–471.
Goldstein, S. (2013). Bohmian mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2013 ed.). URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/qm-bohm/
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (2014). Consciousness in the universe: A review of the ‘Orch OR theory’. Physics of Life Reviews, 11(1), 39–78.
Hameroff, S., Gennaro, R., & Pylkkänen, P. (2014). HOT to DOT: A ‘Deeper-Order Thought’ theory of consciousness. In D. Chopra (Ed.), Brain, mind and cosmos [Ebook]. New York: Trident Media Group.
Haven, E. (2005). Pilot-wave theory and financial option pricing. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 44, 1957–1962.
Hiley, B. J., & Pylkkänen, P. (2005). Can mind affect matter via active information? Mind and Matter, 3(2), 7–26. http://www.mindmatter.de/resources/pdf/hileywww.pdf.
Holland, P. (2011). A quantum of history. Contemporary Physics, 52, 355.
Humphreys, N. (1982). Consciousness regained. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Khrennikov, A. (2004). Fundamental Theories of Physics Series: Vol. V. Information dynamics in cognitive, psychological and anomalous phenomena (p. 138). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ladyman, J., & Ross, D. (2007). Every thing must go: Metaphysics naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.
Lorenz, K. (1977). Behind the mirror [Rückseite dyes Speigels] (R. Taylor, Trans.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Maleeh, R., & Amani, P. (2012). Bohm’s theory of the relationship of mind and matter revisited. NeuroQuantology, 10, 150–163.
Maroney, O. (2002). Information and entropy in quantum theory. PhD thesis, Birkbeck College, University of London. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/tpru/OwenMaroney/thesis/thesis.html
Maroney, O., & Hiley, B. J. (1999). Quantum state teleportation understood through the Bohm interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 29(9), 1403–1415.
Nagel, T. (2005). Dualism. In T. Honderich (Ed.), The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Ney, A., & Albert, D. (Eds.). (2013). The wave function: Essays on the metaphysics of quantum mechanics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L., & Tononi, G. (2014). From the phenomenology to the mechanisms of consciousness: Integrated information theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(5): e1003588.
Penfield, W. (1975). The mystery of the mind: A critical study of consciousness and the human brain. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Plato. (1892). The Phaedo. In The Dialogues of Plato (B. Jowett, Trans.). New York: Random House.
Pockett, S., Banks, W., & Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2006). Does consciousness cause behaviour? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pylkkänen, P. (2007). Mind, matter and the implicate order (The Frontiers Collection). Heidelberg and New York: Springer.
Pylkkänen, P. (2014). Can quantum analogies help us to understand the process of thought? Mind and Matter, 12(1), 61–91. http://www.mindmatter.de/resources/pdf/pylkkaenen_www.pdf.
Pylkkänen, P., Hiley, B. J., & Pättiniemi, I. (2016). Bohm’s approach and individuality. In A. Guay & T. Pradeu (Eds.), Individuals across the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Revonsuo, A. (2006). Inner presence: Consciousness as a biological phenomenon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Revonsuo, A. (2015). Hard to see the problem? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 22(3–4), 52–67.
Ritchie, J. (2008). Understanding naturalism. Durham, NC: Acumen.
Roederer, J. G. (2005). Information and its role in nature. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
Rosenthal, D. M. (1997). A theory of consciousness. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Güzeldere (Eds.), The nature of consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosenthal, D. M. (2009). Concepts and definitions of consciousness. In W. P. Banks (Ed.), Encyclopedia of consciousness. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shiffrin, R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic processing: Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–64.
Smith, Q. (2003). Why cognitive scientists cannot ignore quantum mechanics? In Q. Smith & A. Jokic (Eds.), Consciousness: New philosophical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stapp, H. (2005). Comment on Hiley-Pylkkanen paper. The Stapp files. http://www-physics.lbl.gov/~stapp/HileyPylkkanen.txt.
Tononi, G., & Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: Here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370, 20140167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0167.
Tuomela, R. (2013). Social ontology: Collective intentionality and group agents. New York: Oxford University Press.
Van Gulick, R. (2014). Consciousness. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2014 ed.). URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/consciousness/
Velmans, M. (1991). Is human information processing conscious? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14(4), 651–668.
Walleczek, J., & Grössing, G. (2016). Nonlocal Quantum Information Transfer Without Superluminal Signalling and Communication. Foundations of Physics 46(9), 1208–1228.
Weber, R. (1987). Meaning as being in the implicate order philosophy of David Bohm: A conversation. In B. J. Hiley & F. D. Peat (Eds.), Quantum Implications: Essays in honour of David Bohm. London: Routledge.
Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science: Unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pylkkänen, P. (2017). Is there Room in Quantum Ontology for a Genuine Causal Role for Consciousness?. In: Haven, E., Khrennikov, A. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Quantum Models in Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49276-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49276-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49275-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49276-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)