Skip to main content
  • 2216 Accesses

Abstract

In 1965, social psychologist Robert Rosenthal and school principal Lenore Jacobson conducted a classroom experiment to test how teachers’ expectations might affect the intellectual development of their pupils (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1966). They administered the authoritatively sounding “Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition” to the pupils of Jacobson’s elementary school, telling teachers that the test identified which children were likely to undergo an academic “growth spurt” in the coming year. Yet, in reality the administered test was a standard IQ test and the children designated as intellectual bloomers were selected at random. When pupils were given the same test at the end of the school year, the bloomers showed significantly greater gains in IQ scores than the control group. The results seemed to confirm that teachers’ expectations could affect the intellectual development of pupils and act as an educational self-fulfilling prophecy (Merton, 1948).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Where expectations are the result of natural teacher–pupil interactions, rather than experimentally induced.

  2. 2.

    This particular effect of teacher expectations (expectancy–confirmation bias or biased perception) differs from the self-fulfilling prophecy effect. The former occurs in the mind of the teacher, whereas the latter occurs because of an actual change of behaviour in the student. The effect of expectancy–confirmation bias can be seen in the consistent finding that teacher expectations predict student grades more strongly than they predict standardised test scores (Jussim, 2008). Teachers assign grades but not standardised test scores, and therefore this difference likely reflects expectancy–confirmation bias in their evaluation of students.

  3. 3.

    See Popper & Notturno, 1994.

  4. 4.

    The emphasis is on internal consistency. What seems inconsistent to an outsider may not be perceived as inconsistent by the person in question.

References

  • Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model building and response surfaces. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2008). Can a general deontic logic capture the facts of human moral reasoning? How the mind interprets social exchange rules and detects cheaters. Moral Psychology, 1, 53–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R., Everitt, B. J., & Bishop, D. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions, 351, 1413–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene, S. (2013, December 20). Enseigner est une science. Le Monde. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2013/12/20/enseigner-est-une-science_4338294_3232.html

  • Elashoff, J. D., & Snow, R. E. (1971). Pygmalion reconsidered: A case study in statistical inference: reconsideration of the Rosenthal-Jacobson data on teacher expectancy. Worthington, OH: C. A. Jones Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goigoux, R. (2013, December 31). Apprentissage de la lecture: Opposer méthode syllabique et méthode globale est archaïque. Le Monde. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2013/12/31/apprentissage-de-la-lecture-depassons-l-opposition-archaique-entre-methode-syllabique-et-methode-globale_4341366_3232.html

  • Good, T. L. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 38, 415–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L. (2008). Teacher expectations. In E. M. Anderman & L. H. Anderman (Eds.), The psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (Vol. 2). Detroit, MI: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R., & Notturno, M. A. (1994). The myth of the framework: In defence of science and rationality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 176–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1995, December). Critiquing Pygmalion: A 25-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 4, 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers’ expectancies: Determinants of pupils’ IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubie-Davies, C. M., Weinstein, R. S., Huang, F. L., Gregory, A., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2014). Successive teacher expectation effects across the early school years. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (2014). Dual-process theories of the social mind. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E. (1995). Pygmalion and intelligence? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 169–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, H. H. (1999). Beleaguered Pygmalion: A history of the controversy over claims that teacher expectancy raises intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 199–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach. Psychological Review, 112, 159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. S. (1987). The self-fulfilment of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Educational Researcher, 16, 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kris De Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Meyer, K. (2016). The Mind of the Educator. In: Lees, H., Noddings, N. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Alternative Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41291-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41291-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41290-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41291-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics