Abstract
In 1965, social psychologist Robert Rosenthal and school principal Lenore Jacobson conducted a classroom experiment to test how teachers’ expectations might affect the intellectual development of their pupils (Rosenthal & Jacobson, 1966). They administered the authoritatively sounding “Harvard Test of Inflected Acquisition” to the pupils of Jacobson’s elementary school, telling teachers that the test identified which children were likely to undergo an academic “growth spurt” in the coming year. Yet, in reality the administered test was a standard IQ test and the children designated as intellectual bloomers were selected at random. When pupils were given the same test at the end of the school year, the bloomers showed significantly greater gains in IQ scores than the control group. The results seemed to confirm that teachers’ expectations could affect the intellectual development of pupils and act as an educational self-fulfilling prophecy (Merton, 1948).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Where expectations are the result of natural teacher–pupil interactions, rather than experimentally induced.
- 2.
This particular effect of teacher expectations (expectancy–confirmation bias or biased perception) differs from the self-fulfilling prophecy effect. The former occurs in the mind of the teacher, whereas the latter occurs because of an actual change of behaviour in the student. The effect of expectancy–confirmation bias can be seen in the consistent finding that teacher expectations predict student grades more strongly than they predict standardised test scores (Jussim, 2008). Teachers assign grades but not standardised test scores, and therefore this difference likely reflects expectancy–confirmation bias in their evaluation of students.
- 3.
See Popper & Notturno, 1994.
- 4.
The emphasis is on internal consistency. What seems inconsistent to an outsider may not be perceived as inconsistent by the person in question.
References
Aronson, E. (1969). The theory of cognitive dissonance: A current perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 1–34.
Box, G. E. P., & Draper, N. R. (1987). Empirical model building and response surfaces. New York: Wiley.
Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 631–661.
Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333–371.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2008). Can a general deontic logic capture the facts of human moral reasoning? How the mind interprets social exchange rules and detects cheaters. Moral Psychology, 1, 53–120.
Damasio, A. R., Everitt, B. J., & Bishop, D. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions, 351, 1413–1420.
Dehaene, S. (2013, December 20). Enseigner est une science. Le Monde. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2013/12/20/enseigner-est-une-science_4338294_3232.html
Elashoff, J. D., & Snow, R. E. (1971). Pygmalion reconsidered: A case study in statistical inference: reconsideration of the Rosenthal-Jacobson data on teacher expectancy. Worthington, OH: C. A. Jones Pub. Co.
Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 223–241.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
Goigoux, R. (2013, December 31). Apprentissage de la lecture: Opposer méthode syllabique et méthode globale est archaïque. Le Monde. Retrieved from http://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2013/12/31/apprentissage-de-la-lecture-depassons-l-opposition-archaique-entre-methode-syllabique-et-methode-globale_4341366_3232.html
Good, T. L. (1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: A decade of research. Educational Leadership, 38, 415–422.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2008). Looking in classrooms (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
Jussim, L. (2008). Teacher expectations. In E. M. Anderman & L. H. Anderman (Eds.), The psychology of classroom learning: An encyclopedia (Vol. 2). Detroit, MI: Macmillan.
Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131–155.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 49–81). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
Merton, R. K. (1948). The self-fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193–210.
Popper, K. R., & Notturno, M. A. (1994). The myth of the framework: In defence of science and rationality. London: Routledge.
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 176–179.
Rosenthal, R. (1995, December). Critiquing Pygmalion: A 25-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 4, 171–172.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers’ expectancies: Determinants of pupils’ IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19, 115–118.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 377–386.
Rubie-Davies, C. M., Weinstein, R. S., Huang, F. L., Gregory, A., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2014). Successive teacher expectation effects across the early school years. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 181–191.
Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., & Trope, Y. (2014). Dual-process theories of the social mind. New York: Guilford Press.
Slovic, P., & Peters, E. (2006). Risk perception and affect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 322–325.
Snow, R. E. (1995). Pygmalion and intelligence? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 169–171.
Spitz, H. H. (1999). Beleaguered Pygmalion: A history of the controversy over claims that teacher expectancy raises intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 199–234.
Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.
Sun, R., Slusarz, P., & Terry, C. (2005). The interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach. Psychological Review, 112, 159.
Thompson, V. A., Prowse Turner, J. A., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.
Wineburg, S. S. (1987). The self-fulfilment of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Educational Researcher, 16, 28–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Meyer, K. (2016). The Mind of the Educator. In: Lees, H., Noddings, N. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Alternative Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41291-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41291-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-41290-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-41291-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)