Abstract
This case study focuses on Semillas Digitales (Digital Seeds), a comprehensive, multiyear-applied development program in Nicaragua that fosters educational improvement and innovation in coffee farm schools through an action research approach. Informed by the concept of co-constructed collaboration, the authors, who represent multiple stakeholder groups within Semillas, reflect on the Program with a focus on an ethic of shared responsibility, open and critical dialogue, multilateral exchange, and authentic, process- and outcome-focused teamwork; they share what developing and operationalizing educational possibility within and across relational and sociopolitical contexts means and entails. The chapter explores the processes and challenges of co-constructing capacity in assets-based ways and how the design and implementation of Semillas seek to resist the expert-learner binary and impositional stance that often undergird the field of development..
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bhabha, H. (1990). The third space. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference. London: Lawrence & Wishart.
Cavallo, D. (2000). Emergent design and learning environments: Building on indigenous knowledge. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3–4), 768–781.
Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York: Zed Books.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Touchstone.
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Fals Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). Action and knowledge. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “Development,” depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Freire, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods. Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly (pp. 29–37). New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
Gallegos Nava, R. (2001). Holistic education: Pedagogy of universal love. Brandon, VT: Foundation for Educational Renewal.
Gonzalez, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, & classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jacoby, S. & Gonzales, P. (1991). The constitution of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2(2). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fd7z5k4
Jonassen, D. H. (1995a). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Educational Technology, 35(4), 60–63.
Jonassen, D. H. (1995b). An instructional design model for designing constructivist learning environments. In H. Maurer (Ed.), Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Media. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computers in Education.
Kenway, J., & Fahey, J. (2009). Globalizing the research imagination. New York, NY: Routledge.
Kerres, M., & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 101–113.
Nakkula, M. J., & Ravitch, S. M. (1998). Matters of interpretation: Reciprocal transformation in therapeutic and developmental relationships with youth. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Noblit, G. W., Flores, S. Y., & Murillo, E. G. (2004). Postcritical ethnography: An introduction. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Ravitch, S. M., & Tarditi, M. J. (2012). Semillas Digitales theory of action. (Unpublished). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Ravitch, S. M., & Tillman, C. (2010). Collaboration as a site of personal and institutional transformation: Thoughts from inside a cross-national alliance. Perspectives on Urban Education, 8(1), 3–10.
RTI International. (2015). Education evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.eddataglobal.org/reading/index.cfm
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.
Valencia, R. R. (2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York: Routledge.
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/nmkhd6v
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ravitch, S.M., Tarditi, M.J., Montenegro, N., Baltodano, D., Estrada, E. (2017). Learning Together: Dialogue, Collaboration, and Reciprocal Transformation in a Nicaraguan Educational Program. In: Rowell, L., Bruce, C., Shosh, J., Riel, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44108-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40523-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)