Skip to main content

Abstract

Peter Reason and Hilary Bradbury (2006) began the introduction to the second edition of their groundbreaking Handbook of Action Research with a broad overview of the volume’s contents and a framing of action research as “inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration” (p. 1). The framing suggests that they were observing an emerging participatory worldview (p. 7) that validated the worthiness of action research as an inquiry process for making change in our world. Today, human aspirations are challenged in ways that go beyond even the contexts of nine years ago. This International Handbook of Action Research critically examines the challenges of the present moment as well as the potential of action research to bolster a move away from the hegemonic globalization project now being enacted in the name of a free-market capitalism that, left unfettered, threatens democracy itself (Chang, 2008; Rodrik, 2011).

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI 10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_50.

An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_50

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bell, B., Gaventa, J., & Peters, J. (Eds.). (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. D., Bammer, G., Batliwala, S., & Kunreuther, F. (2003). Framing practice-research engagement for democratizing knowledge. Action Research, 1(1), 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. (2006). Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 421–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2008). Bad Samaritans: The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donmoyer, R. (2014). What If Educational Inquiry Were Neither a Social Science Nor a Humanities Field? Revisiting Joseph Schawb’s “The Practical” in the Aftermath of the Science Wars. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22 (8). http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n8.2014. This article is part of EPAA/AAPE’s Special Issue on Qualitative Inquiry.

  • Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (1991). (Eds.). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. New York: Apex Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Kastanis, E., Montoya-Vargas, J., & Suarez, D. H. (2009). Participatory action research in Latin American education: A road map to a different part of the world. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 453–466). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1999). The great disruption: Human nature and the reconstitution of social order. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J., & Cornwall, A. (2006). Power and knowledge. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The handbook of action research (pp. 70–80). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2014). The violence of organized forgetting: Thinking beyond America’s disimagination machine. San Francisco: City Lights Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations: Remaking of world order. New York: Simon & Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1999). The end of utopia: Politics and culture in an age of apathy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, S. (2009). From a methodology of the margins to neoliberal appropriation and beyond: The lineages of PAR. In D. Kapoor & S. Jordan (Eds.), Education, participatory action research, and social change: International perspective (pp. 15–27). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., Heikkinen, H. L. T., Fransson, G., Aspfors, J., & Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Mentoring of new teachers as a contested practice: Supervision, support, and collaborative self-development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 154–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (1991). Deconstructing/Deconstructive Inquiry: The Politics of Knowing and Being Known, Educational Theory, 41(2), 153-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naranjo, C. (2009). Healing civilization. Oakland, CA: Rose Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2006). Introduction: Inquiry and participation in search of a world worthy of human aspiration. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (pp. 1–14). Concise Paperback Edition. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Democracy and the future of the world economy. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. T. (2011). Age of fracture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. D. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1992). Culture wars: School and society in the conservative restoration. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B., & Noffke, S. (2009). Conclusions. In S. Noffke, & B. Somekh (Eds.). The Sage handbook of educational action research, pp. 521-525. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiollent, M. (2011). Action research and participatory research: An overview. International Journal of Action Research, 7, 160–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. (2015). Honouring the truth, reconciling for the future. Summary of the final report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. Accessed at: http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/File/2015/Honouring_the_Truth_Reconciling_for_the_Future_July_23_2015.pdf

  • Yancy, G., & Butler, J. (2015, January 12). What’s wrong with ‘all lives matter’? New York Times. Accessed at: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/01/12/whats-wrong-with-all-lives-matter/?_r=0

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowell, L.L., Bruce, C.D., Shosh, J.M., Riel, M.M. (2017). Introduction. In: Rowell, L., Bruce, C., Shosh, J., Riel, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44108-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40523-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics