Skip to main content

Heterogeneity and Performance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

A basic premise in the field of business strategy is that close competitors will have different strategies and different levels of success. Yet economic logic suggests that success will attract competitors and imitation; competition should weed out weak performers and competitors should converge on a best way of doing things. Since the 1970s, strategy scholars have reported on within-industry heterogeneity. They described how mobility barriers allowed strategic groups to exist and how isolating mechanisms allowed individual firms unique competitive positions. Since then it has been shown that, despite competition and imitation, close competitors have different strategies, resources, capabilities and preferences, leading to varying levels of economic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balakrishnan, S., and I. Fox. 1993. Asset specificity, firm heterogeneity and capital structure. Strategic Management Journal 14: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1986. Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science 32: 1231–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17: 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J.B., and R.E. Hoskisson. 1990. Strategic groups: Untested assertions and research proposals. Managerial and Decision Economics 11: 187–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BCG (Boston Consulting Group). 1972. Perspectives on experience. Boston: Boston Consulting Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris, C.W., and R.G. Hubbard. 1990. Firm heterogeneity, internal finance, and ‘credit rationing’. The Economic Journal 100: 90–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R.E., and M.E. Porter. 1977. From entry barriers to mobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics 91: 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K.B., and T. Fujimoto. 1991. Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, B.T. 1972. Market share and rate of return. Review of Economics and Statistics 54: 412–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D., and K. Kneller. 2007. Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. The Economic Journal 117: F134–F161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatten, K.J., and D.E. Schendel. 1977. Heterogeneity within an industry: Firm conduct in the U.S. brewing industry, 1952–71. Journal of Industrial Economics 26: 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.H., and S.C. Wheelwright. 1984. Restoring our competitive edge: Competing through manufacturing. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.H., S.C. Wheelwright, and K. Clark. 1988. Dynamic manufacturing: Creating the learning organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., and K.C. Clark. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, D.G., and T. Madsen. 2008. A capability-based view of competitive heterogeneity. Industrial and Corporate Change 17: 393–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes, D.G., T.L. Madsen, and G. Walker. 2003. Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal 24: 889–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.R., and D.G. Hoopes. 2003. Managerial cognition, sunk costs and the evolution of industry structure. Strategic Management Journal 24: 1057–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D.A. 1995. Strategic management and the exploration of diversity. In Resource-based and evolutionary theories of the firm: Toward a synthesis, ed. C.A. Montgomery. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A., and R.P. Rumelt. 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., and A. Zaheer. 1999. Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal 20: 1133–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, J., and S.W. Floyd. 1998. Product market heterogeneity, resource imitability and strategic group formation. Journal of Management 24: 511–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noda, T., and D.J. Collis. 2001. The evolution of intraindustry firm heterogeneity: Insights from a process study. Academy of Management Journal 44: 897–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peteraf, M.A. 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14: 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. 1979. The structure within industries and companies’ performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 61: 214–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.P. 1984. Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In Competitive strategic management, ed. R. Lamb. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.P., and Wensley, R. 1981. In search of the market share effect. Proceedings of the Academy of Management, Aug, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelt, R.P., D. Schendel, and D. Teece (eds.). 1994. Fundamental issues in strategy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaver, J.M., and F. Flyer. 2000. Agglomeration economies, firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment in the United States. Strategic Management Journal 21: 1175–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1980. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1: 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J. 1982. Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3: 39–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D.J., G. Pisano, and A. Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeaple, S.R. 2005. A simple model of firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages. Journal of International Economics 65: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David G. Hoopes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hoopes, D.G. (2018). Heterogeneity and Performance. In: Augier, M., Teece, D.J. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_419

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics