Abstract
Perhaps the most important step in the strategic evolution of multinationals in recent decades has been an increasing willingness to allow subsidiaries to generate distinctive skills and competences and then to leverage these towards wider group-level competitiveness. Seeing this as a process of interdependent individualism points to two key issues in the analysis of the phenomenon. First, how do such subsidiaries generate their individualized scopes? What are the knowledge sources drawn into their creativity? A second key theme is to what extent and in which ways are subsidiary-level competences leveraged so as to be interdependently related to group-level programmes for competitive regeneration. If such subsidiaries are closely monitored in a proscriptive manner this may stifle sources of potentially rewarding diversity and consign the group to very mundane inventive potentials. But allowing them too much independence in creative initiative may provoke anarchy, with unrelated projects adding up to an incoherent agenda for future competitiveness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson, U., and M. Forsgren. 2000. In search of centres of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review 40: 329–350.
Andersson, U., M. Forsgren, and U. Holm. 2001. Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs – A multi-level analysis. Organisational Studies 22: 1013–1034.
Andersson, U., M. Forsgren, and U. Holm. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 23: 979–996.
Bartlett, C.A., and S. Ghoshal. 1986. Tap your subsidiary for global reach. Harvard Business Review 64: 87–94.
Bartlett, C.A., and S. Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. London: Hutchinson Business Books.
Birkinshaw, J.M. 1996. How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies 27: 467–495.
Birkinshaw, J.M. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal 18: 207–229.
Birkinshaw, J.M., and N. Hood. 1997. An empirical study of development processes in foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada and Scotland. Management International Review 37: 339–364.
Birkinshaw, J.M., and N. Hood. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review 23: 773–795.
Birkinshaw, J.M., N. Hood, and S. Jonsson. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal 19: 221–241.
Cantwell, J.A., and R. Mudambi. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 26: 1109–1128.
Cantwell, J.A., and R. Mudambi. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal 1: 206–232.
D’Cruz, J. 1986. Strategic management of subsidiaries. In Managing the multinational subsidiary, ed. H. Etemad and L. Seguin Dulude. London: Croom Helm.
Frost, T.S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal 22: 101–123.
Frost, T.S., J.M. Birkinshaw, and P.C. Ensign. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 23: 997–1018.
Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 16: 768–792.
Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 1994. Organising for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review 3: 443–458.
Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21: 473–496.
Manea, J., and R. Pearce. 2004. Multinationals and transition. London: Palgrave.
Manolopoulos, D., M. Papanastassiou, and R. Pearce. 2005. Technology sourcing in multinational enterprises and the roles of subsidiaries: An empirical investigation. International Business Review 14: 249–267.
McGuiness, N.W., and H.A. Conway. 1986. World product mandates: The need for directed search strategies. In Managing the multinational subisidary, ed. H. Etemad and L. SĂ©guin Dulude. London: Croom Helm.
Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1994. Host-country determinants of the market strategies of US companies’ overseas subsidiaries. Journal of the Economics of Business 1: 199–217.
Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1997. Technology sourcing and the strategic roles of manufacturing subsidiaries in the UK: Local competences and global competitiveness. Management International Review 37: 5–25.
Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1998. Individualism and interdependence in the technological development of MNEs: The strategic positioning of R&D in overseas subsidiaries. In Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development, ed. J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood. London: Macmillan.
Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1999. Multinationals, technology and national competitiveness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 2009. The strategic development of multinationals: Subsidiaries and innovation. London: Palgrave.
Pearce, R. 2011. Knowledge-seeking in multinationals and economic development: Illustrations from china. Asian Business and Management 11: 8–30.
Poynter, T.A., and A.M. Rugman. 1982. World product mandates: How will multinationals respond? Business Quarterly 47: 54–61.
Rugman, A.M. 1983. Multinational enterprises and world product mandates. In Multinationals and technology transfer: The Canadian experience, ed. A.M. Rugman. New York: Praeger.
Rugman, A.M., and J. Bennett. 1982. Technology transfer and world product mandating in Canada. Colombia Journal of World Business 17: 58–62.
Rugman, A.M., and S. Douglas. 1986. The strategic management of multinationals and world product mandating. Canadian Public Policy 12: 320–328.
Rugman, A.M., and A. Verbeke. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal 22: 237–250.
Taggart, J.H. 1998a. Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal 19: 663–681.
Taggart, J.H. 1998b. Identification and development of strategy at subsidiary level. In Multinational corporation evolution and subsidiary development, ed. J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood. London: Macmillan.
White, R.E., and J.A. Poynter. 1984. Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly 49: 59–69.
Yamin, M. 2005. Subsidiary business networks and opportunity development in multinational enterprises: A comparison of the influence of internal and external business networks. In Managing opportunity development in business networks, ed. P. Ghauri, A. Hadjikhani, and J. Johanson. London: Macmillan Palgrave.
Yamin, M., and U. Andersson. 2011. Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? International Business Review 20: 151–162.
Zhang, S., and R. Pearce. 2012. Multinationals in China: Business strategy, technology and economic development. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Papanastassiou, M., Pearce, R. (2018). Leveraging Foreign Subsidiaries’ Skills. In: Augier, M., Teece, D.J. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_352
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_352
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-53721-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-00772-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences