Skip to main content

Leveraging Foreign Subsidiaries’ Skills

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management

Abstract

Perhaps the most important step in the strategic evolution of multinationals in recent decades has been an increasing willingness to allow subsidiaries to generate distinctive skills and competences and then to leverage these towards wider group-level competitiveness. Seeing this as a process of interdependent individualism points to two key issues in the analysis of the phenomenon. First, how do such subsidiaries generate their individualized scopes? What are the knowledge sources drawn into their creativity? A second key theme is to what extent and in which ways are subsidiary-level competences leveraged so as to be interdependently related to group-level programmes for competitive regeneration. If such subsidiaries are closely monitored in a proscriptive manner this may stifle sources of potentially rewarding diversity and consign the group to very mundane inventive potentials. But allowing them too much independence in creative initiative may provoke anarchy, with unrelated projects adding up to an incoherent agenda for future competitiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andersson, U., and M. Forsgren. 2000. In search of centres of excellence: Network embeddedness and subsidiary roles in multinational corporations. Management International Review 40: 329–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., M. Forsgren, and U. Holm. 2001. Subsidiary embeddedness and competence development in MNCs – A multi-level analysis. Organisational Studies 22: 1013–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, U., M. Forsgren, and U. Holm. 2002. The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal 23: 979–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A., and S. Ghoshal. 1986. Tap your subsidiary for global reach. Harvard Business Review 64: 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C.A., and S. Ghoshal. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution. London: Hutchinson Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J.M. 1996. How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost. Journal of International Business Studies 27: 467–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J.M. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal 18: 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J.M., and N. Hood. 1997. An empirical study of development processes in foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada and Scotland. Management International Review 37: 339–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J.M., and N. Hood. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review 23: 773–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J.M., N. Hood, and S. Jonsson. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative. Strategic Management Journal 19: 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A., and R. Mudambi. 2005. MNE competence-creating subsidiary mandates. Strategic Management Journal 26: 1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, J.A., and R. Mudambi. 2011. Physical attraction and the geography of knowledge sourcing in multinational enterprises. Global Strategy Journal 1: 206–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Cruz, J. 1986. Strategic management of subsidiaries. In Managing the multinational subsidiary, ed. H. Etemad and L. Seguin Dulude. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T.S. 2001. The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal 22: 101–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, T.S., J.M. Birkinshaw, and P.C. Ensign. 2002. Centers of excellence in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 23: 997–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 16: 768–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 1994. Organising for knowledge flows within MNCs. International Business Review 3: 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K., and V. Govindarajan. 2000. Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal 21: 473–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manea, J., and R. Pearce. 2004. Multinationals and transition. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manolopoulos, D., M. Papanastassiou, and R. Pearce. 2005. Technology sourcing in multinational enterprises and the roles of subsidiaries: An empirical investigation. International Business Review 14: 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuiness, N.W., and H.A. Conway. 1986. World product mandates: The need for directed search strategies. In Managing the multinational subisidary, ed. H. Etemad and L. SĂ©guin Dulude. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1994. Host-country determinants of the market strategies of US companies’ overseas subsidiaries. Journal of the Economics of Business 1: 199–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1997. Technology sourcing and the strategic roles of manufacturing subsidiaries in the UK: Local competences and global competitiveness. Management International Review 37: 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1998. Individualism and interdependence in the technological development of MNEs: The strategic positioning of R&D in overseas subsidiaries. In Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development, ed. J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 1999. Multinationals, technology and national competitiveness. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanastassiou, M., and R. Pearce. 2009. The strategic development of multinationals: Subsidiaries and innovation. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, R. 2011. Knowledge-seeking in multinationals and economic development: Illustrations from china. Asian Business and Management 11: 8–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poynter, T.A., and A.M. Rugman. 1982. World product mandates: How will multinationals respond? Business Quarterly 47: 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M. 1983. Multinational enterprises and world product mandates. In Multinationals and technology transfer: The Canadian experience, ed. A.M. Rugman. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M., and J. Bennett. 1982. Technology transfer and world product mandating in Canada. Colombia Journal of World Business 17: 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M., and S. Douglas. 1986. The strategic management of multinationals and world product mandating. Canadian Public Policy 12: 320–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugman, A.M., and A. Verbeke. 2001. Subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises. Strategic Management Journal 22: 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J.H. 1998a. Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries. Strategic Management Journal 19: 663–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J.H. 1998b. Identification and development of strategy at subsidiary level. In Multinational corporation evolution and subsidiary development, ed. J. Birkinshaw and N. Hood. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R.E., and J.A. Poynter. 1984. Strategies for foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada. Business Quarterly 49: 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M. 2005. Subsidiary business networks and opportunity development in multinational enterprises: A comparison of the influence of internal and external business networks. In Managing opportunity development in business networks, ed. P. Ghauri, A. Hadjikhani, and J. Johanson. London: Macmillan Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin, M., and U. Andersson. 2011. Subsidiary importance in the MNC: What role does internal embeddedness play? International Business Review 20: 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., and R. Pearce. 2012. Multinationals in China: Business strategy, technology and economic development. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Papanastassiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Papanastassiou, M., Pearce, R. (2018). Leveraging Foreign Subsidiaries’ Skills. In: Augier, M., Teece, D.J. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-00772-8_352

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics