Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sunscreen: FDA regulation, and environmental and health impact

  • Paper
  • Published:
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Photoprotection, including the use of sunscreen, has been shown to decrease the development of keratinocyte cancers and melanoma. Due to concerns about the environmental effects of some organic UVR filters, several locations across the world have begun to pass legislation banning the use of these ingredients in sunscreens. Furthermore, the health effects of several organic UVR filters have also been called into question and a recent proposal by the US FDA has resulted in public confusion about the safety of sunscreens. The aim of this article is to discuss FDA regulation of sunscreens and to review the environmental and health effects of oxybenzone and octinoxate. Ultimately, as dermatologists, our recommendations are to continue to encourage people to practice proper photoprotection including photoprotective clothing, staying in the shade while outdoors, and applying sunscreen to exposed areas. For those concerned about the potential environmental and health effects of organic UVR filters, inorganic/mineral UVR filter (namely, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide)-based sunscreens can be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Registry, in Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use, ed. F. A. D. Administration, Federal Registry, 2019, p. 6204–6275.

  2. S. Q. Wang and H. W. Lim, Highlights and implications of the 2019 proposed rule on sunscreens by the US Food and Drug Administration J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2019, 81, 650–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. K. Matta, R. Zusterzeel, N. R. Pilli, V. Patel, D. A. Volpe, J. Florian, et al., Effect of Sunscreen Application Under Maximal Use Conditions on Plasma Concentration of Sunscreen Active Ingredients: A Randomized Clinical Trial J. Am. Med. Assoc., 2019, 321, 2082–2091.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. C. van der Pols, G. M. Williams, N. Pandeya, V. Logan and A. C. Green, Prolonged prevention of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin by regular sunscreen use, Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev., 2006, 15, 2546–2548.

  5. A. C. Green, G. M. Williams, V. Logan and G. M. Strutton, Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up, J. Clin. Oncol., 2011, 29, 257–263.

  6. F. Registry, in Sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use, F. Registry, 1978, p. 38206–38269.

  7. S. Q. Wang and H. W. Lim, Current status of the sunscreen regulation in the United States: 2011 Food and Drug Administration’s final rule on labeling and effectiveness testing, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2011, 65, 863–869.

  8. R. Ma, B. Cotton, W. Lichtensteiger and M. Schlumpf, UV Filters with Antagonistic Action at Androgen Receptors in the MDA-kb2 Cell Transcriptional-Activation Assay, Toxicol. Sci., 2003, 74, 43–50.

  9. M. Heneweer, M. Muusse, M. van den Berg and J. T. Sanderson, Additive estrogenic effects of mixtures of frequently used UV filters on pS2-gene transcription in MCF-7 cells, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 2005, 208, 170–177.

  10. M. Schlumpf, B. Cotton, M. Conscience, V. Haller, B. Steinmann and W. Lichtensteiger, In vitro and in vivo estrogenicity of UV screens, Environ. Health Perspect., 2001, 109, 239–244.

  11. M. Coronado, H. De Haro, X. Deng, M. A. Rempel, R. Lavado and D. Schlenk, Estrogenic activity and reproductive effects of the UV-filter oxybenzone (2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl-methanone) in fish, Aquat. Toxicol., 2008, 90, 182–187.

  12. B. Petersen and H. C. Wulf, Application of sunscreen – theory and reality, Photodermatol., Photoimmunol. Photomed., 2014, 30, 96–101.

  13. R. Neale, G. Williams and A. Green, Application patterns among participants randomized to daily sunscreen use in a skin cancer prevention trial, Arch. Dermatol., 2002, 138, 1319–1325.

  14. H. C. Wulf, I. M. Stender and J. Lock-Andersen, Sunscreens used at the beach do not protect against erythema: A new definition of SPF is proposed, Photodermatol., Photoimmunol. Photomed., 1997, 13, 129–132.

  15. S. Q. Wang, M. E. Burnett and H. W. Lim, Safety of oxybenzone: putting numbers into perspective, Arch. Dermatol., 2011, 147, 865–866.

  16. N. R. Janjua, B. Mogensen, A. M. Andersson, J. H. Petersen, M. Henriksen, N. E. Skakkebaek, et al., Systemic absorption of the sunscreens benzophenone-3, octyl-methoxycinnamate, and 3-(4-methyl-benzylidene) camphor after whole-body topical application and reproductive hormone levels in humans, J. Invest. Dermatol., 2004, 123, 57–61.

  17. D. G. Yeager and H. W. Lim, What’s New in Photoprotection: A Review of New Concepts and Controversies, Dermatol. Clin., 2019, 37, 149–157.

  18. N. R. Janjua, B. Kongshoj, J. H. Petersen and H. C. Wulf, Sunscreens and thyroid function in humans after short-term whole-body topical application: a single-blinded study, Br. J. Dermatol., 2007, 156, 1080–1082.

  19. C. P. da Silva, E. S. Emidio and M. R. de Marchi, The occurrence of UV filters in natural and drinking water in Sao Paulo State (Brazil), Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2015, 22, 19706–19715.

  20. M. E. Balmer, H. R. Buser, M. D. Muller and T. Poiger, Occurrence of some organic UV filters in wastewater, in surface waters, and in fish from Swiss Lakes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39, 953–962.

  21. J. M. Brausch and G. M. Rand, A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: environmental concentrations and toxicity, Chemosphere, 2011, 82, 1518–1532.

  22. K. I. Ekpeghere, S.-H. O, U. J. Kim, H. Y. Kim and J. E. Oh, Distribution and seasonal occurrence of UV filters in rivers and wastewater treatment plants in Korea, Sci. Total Environ., 2016, 542, 121–128.

  23. N. Bluthgen, N. Meili, G. Chew, A. Odermatt and K. Fent, Accumulation and effects of the UV-filter octocrylene in adult and embryonic zebrafish (Danio rerio), Sci. Total Environ., 2014, 476–477, 207–217.

  24. S. L. Schneider and H. W. Lim, Review of environmental effects of oxybenzone and other sunscreen active ingredients, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 2019, 80, 266–271.

  25. C. A. Downs, E. Kramarsky-Winter, R. Segal, J. Fauth, S. Knutson, O. Bronstein, et al., Toxicopathological Effects of the Sunscreen UV Filter, Oxybenzone (Benzophenone-3), on Coral Planulae and Cultured Primary Cells and Its Environmental Contamination in Hawaii and the U.S. Virgin Islands, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2016, 70, 265–288.

  26. C. L. Mitchelmore, K. He, M. Gonsior, E. Hain, A. Heyes, C. Clark, et al., Occurrence and distribution of UV-filters and other anthropogenic contaminants in coastal surface water, sediment, and coral tissue from Hawaii, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 670, 398–410.

  27. Y. Du, W. Q. Wang, Z. T. Pei, F. Ahmad, R. R. Xu, Y. M. Zhang, et al., Acute Toxicity and Ecological Risk Assessment of Benzophenone-3 (BP-3) and Benzophenone-4 (BP-4) in Ultraviolet (UV)-Filters, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2017, 14, 1414.

  28. L. Cheng, J. Abraham, Z. Hausfather and K. E. Trenberth, How fast are the oceans warming?, Science, 2019, 363, 128–129.

  29. M. Slattery, M. S. Pankey and M. P. Lesser, Annual Thermal Stress Increases a Soft Coral’s Susceptibility to Bleaching, Sci. Rep., 2019, 9, 8064.

  30. T. P. Hughes, J. T. Kerry, A. H. Baird, S. R. Connolly, T. J. Chase, A. Dietzel, et al., Global warming impairs stock-recruitment dynamics of corals, Nature, 2019, 568, 387–390.

  31. Authority GBRMP, Final report: 2016 coral bleaching event on the Great Barrier Reef, GBRMPA, Townsville, 2017.

  32. H. C. Barkley, A. L. Cohen, N. R. Mollica, R. E. Brainard, H. E. Rivera, T. M. DeCarlo, et al., Repeat bleaching of a central Pacific coral reef over the past six decades (1960–2016), Commun. Biol., 2018, 1, 177.

  33. M. E. Balmer, H.-R. Buser, M. D. Müller and T. Poiger, Occurrence of Some Organic UV Filters in Wastewater, in Surface Waters, and in Fish from Swiss Lakes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2005, 39, 953–962.

  34. K. H. Langford, M. J. Reid, E. Fjeld, S. Oxnevad and K. V. Thomas, Environmental occurrence and risk of organic UV filters and stabilizers in multiple matrices in Norway, Environ. Int., 2015, 80, 1–7.

  35. P. Gago-Ferrero, M. S. Díaz-Cruz and D. Barceló, An overview of UV-absorbing compounds (organic UV filters) in aquatic biota, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2012, 404, 2597–2610.

  36. C. Corinaldesi, F. Marcellini, E. Nepote, E. Damiani and R. Danovaro, Impact of inorganic UV filters contained in sunscreen products on tropical stony corals (Acropora spp.), Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 637–638, 1279–1285.

  37. F. Grande and P. Tucci, Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: a Risk for Human Health?, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem., 2016, 16, 762–769.

  38. N. Rihane, T. Nury, I. M’Rad, L. El Mir, M. Sakly, S. Amara, et al., Microglial cells (BV-2) internalize titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles: toxicity and cellular responses, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2016, 23, 9690–9699.

  39. Y. Ze, R. Hu, X. Wang, X. Sang, X. Ze, B. Li, et al., Neurotoxicity and gene-expressed profile in brain-injured mice caused by exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 2014, 102, 470–478.

  40. G. J. Nohynek and E. K. Dufour, Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: a risk to human health?, Arch. Toxicol., 2012, 86, 1063–1075.

  41. K. Schilling, B. Bradford, D. Castelli, E. Dufour, J. F. Nash, W. Pape, et al., Human safety review of “nano” titanium dioxide and zinc oxide Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2010, 9, 495–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. S. L. Schneider and H. W. Lim, A review of inorganic UV filters zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, Photodermatol., Photoimmunol. Photomed., 2018, 442–446.

  43. A. C. Ross, J. E. Manson, S. A. Abrams, J. F. Aloia, P. M. Brannon, S. K. Clinton, et al., The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 2011, 96, 53–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

    Shanthi Narla & Henry W. Lim

Authors
  1. Shanthi Narla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Henry W. Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanthi Narla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Narla, S., Lim, H.W. Sunscreen: FDA regulation, and environmental and health impact. Photochem Photobiol Sci 19, 66–70 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9pp00366e

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c9pp00366e

Search

Navigation