Abstract
The serotonin transporter (5-HTT) is a key feature of the serotonin system, which is involved in behavior, cognition and personality and implicated in neuropsychiatric illnesses including depression. The brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) val66met and 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms have predicted differences in 5-HTT levels in humans but with equivocal results, possibly due to limited sample sizes. Within the current study we evaluated these genetic predictors of 5-HTT binding with [11C]DASB positron emission tomography (PET) in a comparatively large cohort of 144 healthy individuals. We used a latent variable model to determine genetic effects on a latent variable (5-HTTLV), reflecting shared correlation across regional 5-HTT binding (amygdala, caudate, hippocampus, midbrain, neocortex, putamen and thalamus). Our data supported a significant BDNF val66met effect on 5-HTTLV such that met-carriers showed 2–7% higher subcortical 5-HTT binding compared with val/val individuals (P=0.042). Our data did not support a BDNF val66met effect in neocortex and 5-HTTLPR did not significantly predict 5-HTTLV. We did not observe evidence for an interaction between genotypes. Our findings indicate that met-carriers have increased subcortical 5-HTT binding. The small difference suggests limited statistical power may explain previously reported null effects. Our finding adds to emerging evidence that BDNF val66met contributes to differences in the human brain serotonin system, informing how variability in the 5-HTT level emerges and may represent an important molecular mediator of BDNF val66met effects on behavior and related risk for neuropsychiatric illness.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Serotonin is an important neurotransmitter implicated in many aspects of behavior and cognition.1 Dysfunction of the brain serotonin system is thought to play a role in neuropsychiatric illnesses including depressive and anxiety disorders.2, 3 Therefore, identifying sources of variability in serotonin signaling may help elucidate mechanisms that drive variability in behavior and related risk for illness. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a signaling molecule that critically affects synaptic plasticity, axonal growth and cell survival.4 Furthermore, compelling evidence from animal models and human studies indicate that BDNF affects the serotonin system.5, 6 Within the human BDNF gene a common single-nucleotide polymorphism (BDNF val66met, rs6265) has been identified wherein the met-allele is associated with reduced activity-dependent BDNF release.7 This polymorphism has been associated with inter-individual variability in multiple behavioral phenotypes including memory performance, aggression and fear recall.7, 8, 9, 10 The met-allele has been associated with increased vulnerability for depression in the presence of stressful life events.11 Another recent study reported an over-representation of met/met individuals with post-traumatic stress disorder and exaggerated startle responses,12 consistent with an association between the met-allele and impaired fear extinction.9 Therefore, identifying serotonin mechanisms sensitive to BDNF val66met genotype would elucidate its role as a potential molecular mediator of this variant on behavior and risk for neuropsychiatric illness.
Molecular neuroimaging genetics studies using positron emission tomography (PET) have reported that compared with BDNF val66met val/val individuals, met-carriers show decreased serotonin 1A receptor (5-HT1A) binding,13 but see also Henningsson et al.,14 and increased serotonin 4 receptor (5-HT4) binding, a putative marker for brain serotonin levels15 but no differences in serotonin 2A receptor binding.16 The BDNF val66met effect on serotonin transporter (5-HTT) binding is unclear as previous studies have reported lower binding in met-carriers but only in males14 and no genotype differences.16, 17 The 5-HTT is a key component of the serotonin system as it is the central mechanism by which serotonin is cleared from the extracellular space.18 However, the relatively small sample size of these studies (N=25–52) coupled with the infrequency of the met-allele (~0.2 in European populations) suggests these studies are limited in identifying a potentially small BDNF val66met effect. Furthermore, BDNF val66met effects may have been moderated by additional genetic variants such as the commonly studied 5-HTTLPR polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene (SLC6A4), which in some studies has been shown to affect 5-HTT binding,19, 20, 21 but see also Parsey et al.22and Murthy et al.23 and moderate effects of BDNF val66met on brain function24 and personality.25 Here we aimed to further characterize the effect of BDNF val66met on 5-HTT levels in a comparatively large cohort of 144 healthy individuals using [11C]DASB PET.
Materials and methods
Participants
Data were included from the Cimbi database.26 All participants were recruited by advertisement for different research protocols approved by the Ethics Committee of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg, Denmark ((KF) 01-124/04, (KF) 01-156/04, (KF) 01 2006-20, H-1-2010-085, H-1-2010-91, H-2-2010-108, including amendments). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants after a complete description of the respective study. Although inclusion criteria varied slightly across studies, (for example, some studies recruited only males or females), all participants included here were generally healthy and without: 1) primary psychiatric disease, 2) substance or drug abuse and 3) severe systemic or neurological disease based on self-reported history and physical/neurological examination. Additional criteria for inclusion in this study were: (1) a [11C]DASB PET scan before any intervention, (2) available BDNF val66met and 5-HTTLPR genotype, (3) self-identified European ancestry and (4)⩽51 years old (to limit partial volume effects and because of a clear break in the age distribution of [11C]DASB scans between 51 and 63 years of age). [11C]DASB PET scans were acquired between 2005 and 2012. Subgroups of individuals with PET data presented here have been included in previous studies.27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 Most notably, data presented here were included in previous reports of BDNF val66met16 and 5-HTTLPR effects on 5-HTT binding.19
Genotyping
BDNF val66met genotype was determined as previously described.15 5-HTTLPR genotype, including the A/G single-nucleotide polymorphism (rs25531), was determined as previously described.35 BDNF val66met genotype was in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (χ2=1.6, (degree of freedom) df=1, P=0.20), whereas this test is not appropriate for 5-HTTLPR because this was an inclusion criterion for some studies.32, 33
MRI data acquisition
A high-resolution T1-weighted structural brain scan was acquired for each participant and used for segmentation and delineation of regions of interest. Scans were acquired on one of two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, a Siemens Magnetom Trio 3 T scanner or a Siemens Verio 3 T scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).
[11C]DASB PET data acquisition
PET scans were acquired on one of two PET scanners, an 18-ring GE-Advance scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, USA) operating in three-dimensional (3D)-acquisition mode with an approximate in-plane resolution of 6 mm or a Siemens ECAT high-resolution research tomograph (HRRT) scanner operating in 3D-acquisition mode with an approximate in-plane resolution of 2 mm. Following a 10- or 6-min transmission scan (Advance and HRRT, respectively), an intravenous bolus injection of [11C]DASB was given over 12 or 20 s (Advance and HRRT scanner) and a dynamic 90-min emission scan was acquired over 36 frames (6 × 10 s, 3 × 20 s, 6 × 30 s, 5 × 60 s, 5 × 120 s, 8 × 300 s, 3 × 600 s). Dynamic PET images acquired on the Advance scanner were reconstructed using filtered back projection and corrected for attenuation, dead-time and scatter using a 6-mm Hann filter. Dynamic PET images acquired on the HRRT scanner were reconstructed using an iterative OP-OSEM3D method with resolution modeling (10 iterations and 16 subsets).36, 37, 38
The automatic image registration algorithm was used to determine single-subject within PET scan motion and realignment.39 PET scans were smoothed using a 12- or 10-mm within-frame Gaussian filter before alignment (Advance and HRRT). We estimated rigid translation/rotation parameters aligning each PET frame to a single PET frame with sufficient structural information using the scaled least squares cost function (frame 26: 20–25 min post injection). Non-filtered PET images were resliced using these parameters. Co-registration of high-resolution MR and PET images was performed using automatic image registration or SPM (Advance and HRRT) based on the mean of frames 10–26, corresponding to a flow-weighted image. Accurate co-registration was confirmed by visual inspection across all planes.
Regions were automatically delineated on the participant’s structural MRI scan using Pvelab.40 Time-activity curves reflecting the mean of gray-matter voxels within each region were determined except for the midbrain region of interest where the mean time-activity curve across all voxels was used. Regional binding potential estimates (BPND) were determined from kinetic modeling of regional time-activity curves in PMOD (Zurich, Switzerland) using the multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM/MRTM2) with a fixed k2’ estimated for each individual using a striatal high binding region and cerebellum as the reference region.41 Bilateral regional BPND values were calculated by computing a volume-weighted mean from the left and the right hemisphere.
Data analysis
Statistical analyses were carried out in R v3.2.2 (https://cran.r-project.org/). The primary outcome measures were regional BPND values for neocortex (including occipital-, orbitofrontal-, parietal–cortex, pre/post central-, middle/inferior frontal-, middle/inferior temporal-, superior frontal- and superior temporal-gyrus), amygdala, caudate, hippocampus, midbrain and thalamus. A single neocortex region was selected in part because of previous observations of particularly high correlation between cortical regions.27 Genotype groupings for all analyses were BDNF val66met: val/val versus met-carriers (at least one met-allele) and 5-HTTLPR: LALA vs S’-carriers (at least one LG or S-allele). Age, sex, PET scanner, MRI scanner, weight-adjusted injected mass of DASB, daylight minutes on day of PET scan and body-mass index were considered as covariates and retained as supported by the data. All continuous variables were mean-centered and dichtomous variables were dummy coded as 0/1.
Latent variable models were estimated using the lava package30 in R. We modeled all regional BPND values onto a single latent variable (5-HTTLV), reflecting shared correlation in BPND across regions.27 We then attempted to model all covariate effects through 5-HTTLV. PET and MRI scanner effects were modeled directly on to each regional BPND estimate because of evidence for region-specific effects, consistent with our previous observation with a different radioligand.15 The addition of model paths was considered iteratively, based on Wald tests of improvement in model fit with a false-discovery rate of q<0.05 (Benjamini–Hochberg false-discovery rate-corrected) across all possible paths. This allowed us to effectively determine the inclusion of model paths supported by the data while controlling the rate of false-positive model paths. Overall, model fit was assessed by comparison of our model against a saturated model, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and support for additional model paths.42 Regional BPND residuals were visually inspected for normality. An identifiable model was chosen such that covariate effects reported can be interpreted in terms of effects on thalamus BPND (reference scale). The entire model was estimated simultaneously and P-values<0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant.
Corresponding univariate linear regression models were estimated for each region. Reported percent differences in 5-HTT BPND reflect the BDNF val66met parameter estimate expressed as a fraction of the intercept parameter estimate for the corresponding linear regression model, multiplied by 100. Unless otherwise stated, results are reported with parameter estimates and 95% confidence intervals in brackets with associated units.
Code availability
R code for latent variable model or other analyses described in the manuscript can be made available upon request.
Results
Demographic and PET scan information is detailed in Table 1. Notably, genotype groups were well balanced across variables and there was no association between BDNF val66met and 5-HTTLPR genotype (χ2=0.02, df=1, P=0.90).
An initial evaluation of regional BPND indicated that they were highly intercorrelated (Supplementary Figure 1). Consistent with this, loadings on the single latent variable, 5-HTTLV, strongly supported shared correlation across regions (all loadings: P<10−12). Weight-adjusted injected DASB mass, daylight minutes and body mass index were not significantly associated with 5-HTTLV and removed from the model. Additional shared inter-regional correlations between (1) caudate and putamen, (2) midbrain and thalamus and (3) amygdala and hippocampus were supported by Wald tests (q<0.03). Wald tests supported an additional direct effect of BDNF val66met on neocortex (q=0.02). Sex was not predictive of 5-HTTLV but Wald tests supported a direct effect on caudate (q=0.02). Subsequently, no additional paths were supported by Wald tests (q>0.3), consistent with good overall model fit. Fit of our final model was less than that of a saturated model (log-likehood ratio test: X2=50.9, df=34, P=0.03), suggesting less than ideal model fit. However, RMSEA was within commonly accepted bounds (RMSEA=0.058, 90% confidence interval (CI): (0.018, 0.09)) and no additional model paths were supported (q>0.3), suggesting good model fit. Adding the most strongly (but not significantly) supported additional path more closely aligned model fit with the saturated model (log-likelihood ratio test: P=0.07) without substantively affecting genotype effects. Taken together, we retained the model excluding this not significantly supported path to limit the addition of false-positive paths and conclude good but not ideal model fit.
Our final model is depicted in Figure 1. Genetic effects in corresponding univariate models can be found in Table 2. Within our final model BDNF val66met significantly predicted 5-HTTLV (met-carriers versus val/val: 0.085 (0.0031, 0.17), P=0.042, units: thalamus BPND), which significantly captured shared correlation in 5-HTT BPND across regions. More specifically, met-carriers showed 2–7% higher 5-HTT BPND across subcortical brain areas compared with val/val individuals (Figure 2). The BDNF val66met effect on neocortex BPND is the sum of the direct (BDNF val66met → neocortex BPND) and indirect (BDNF val66met → 5-HTTLV → neocortex BPND) effects, which indicates no genotype effect on this region (total met-carrier versus val/val neocortex effect: −0.004, (−0.024, 0.016), units: neocortex BPND; Figure 2). We also observed a significant negative effect of age on 5-HTTLV (estimate: −0.098 (−0.15, −0.042), P=0.00069, units: thalamus BPND per decade) and a caudate-specific effect of sex (male versus female: 0.14 (0.062, 0.21), P=0.00036, units: caudate BPND). MRI and PET scanner effects are reported in Supplementary Table 1. We did not find evidence for an interaction between 5-HTTLPR and BDNF val66met in predicting 5-HTTLV (P=0.11).
Discussion
Here we evaluated BDNF val66met effects on 5-HTT binding within a comparatively large molecular neuroimaging data set of 144 healthy individuals using a latent variable model framework. Our findings support that 5-HTT binding across the brain is well described by a single latent variable (5-HTTLV), reflecting significant shared correlation across regions. BDNF val66met significantly predicted subcortical 5-HTT binding as evidenced by an effect on 5-HTTLV but no effect on neocortex 5-HTT binding. Met-carriers showed 2–7% higher subcortical 5-HTT binding compared with val/val individuals. 5-HTTLPR did not significantly predict 5-HTT binding in our model nor did we observe evidence for an interaction between genotypes. Our significant but relatively small group differences may explain equivocal findings from previous studies. This finding provides additional evidence for an effect of BDNF val66met on the adult human brain serotonin system, which may represent a molecular mediator of its effects on behavior, personality and risk for neuropsychiatric illness.
Previous reports of BDNF val66met effects on 5-HTT binding have been inconsistent where one study reported decreased 5-HTT binding in met-carriers, but only in 16 males from a cohort of 25 individuals.14 Our group and another previously reported nonsignificant effects on 5-HTT binding in 52 and 41 individuals, respectively.16, 17 Here we report significantly greater 5-HTT binding in met-carriers across subcortical regions. Considering the relatively small difference in 5-HTT binding (2–7%) that we observed, it is quite plausible that previous studies were underpowered to detect an effect. Notably, we observed a significant effect of BDNF val66met including 43 of the data sets from our previous study (nine excluded because of age).16 Considering evidence that the BDNF val66met met-allele is associated with reduced trafficking and activity-dependent BDNF release,7 our findings indicate these effects contribute to an increase in 5-HTT levels as indexed by [11C]DASB PET. Linking genetic variation with differences in neurobiology enables our ability to more comprehensively model neurobiology via easily acquired genetic information. Our current findings provide a more complete representation of how BDNF val66met shapes individual differences in serotonin signaling, which is implicated in myriad aspects of behavior, brain function and neuropsychiatric illnesses.
We did not find evidence for a BDNF val66met effect on neocortex 5-HTT binding. This is reflected by the sum of the direct and indirect paths between these two variables. The data-driven addition of the direct BDNF val66met → neocortex path in our model significantly improved model fit, indicating that the BDNF effect on neocortex via the latent variable insufficiently captures its effect on neocortex. We previously observed evidence for a neocortex-specific effect of 5-HTTLPR on 5-HT4 binding in healthy controls.15 Considering that 5-HTT BPND is relatively low in neocortex, our null finding may reflect a type-II error stemming from low signal-to-noise. Alternatively, evidence from non-human primates and rodent models indicates that serotonin projections to cortex are sparse relative to subcortical projections and evidence relatively few synapses, suggesting volume transmission.43, 44, 45 As such, it is also possible that 5-HTT levels in neocortex are regulated differently compared with subcortical regions, affecting sensitivity to genetic variation. Regardless, our findings suggest that, although there is high correlation in 5-HTT BPND across regions, suggesting the presence of ‘global regulators’, region-specific effects should also be considered.
We did not find evidence for a 5-HTTLPR effect on 5-HTTLV, although nominally decreased 5-HTTLV in S’-carriers is consistent with in vitro evidence of reduced SLC6A4 transcription.46 Similar previous molecular neuroimaging genetics studies are mixed with some reporting reduced 5-HTT binding in S-carriers,19, 20, 21 whereas other studies have reported no effect.22, 23 Epigenetic information was not available for these data but should be considered in future studies as epigenetic factors such as DNA methylation in the SLC6A4 gene could have moderated 5-HTTLPR effects on 5-HTT binding, possibly explaining the limited correspondence between in vitro and in vivo 5-HTTLPR effects on 5-HTT levels. Here, S’-carriers showed particularly lower 5-HTT BPND in the amygdala, a central brain region for processing salient environmental stimuli and previously linked both to 5-HTTLPR genotype and 5-HTT BPND (Table 2).47, 48, 49 Thus, although it is an intriguing possibility that 5-HTT levels mediate a 5-HTTLPR effect on amygdala function and related behavioral phenotypes, our current findings further suggest this effect is limited in size and therefore would require a uniquely large multimodal neuroimaging sample.
Unsurprisingly, BPND estimates were consistently higher on the HRRT compared with Advance scanner. The higher-resolution HRRT limits spill-in effects of neighboring areas with low binding. However, it is notable that the magnitude of this effect varied across regions, which we could model within this structural equation model framework, highlighting its strength in studies pooling heterogeneous data. We also observed evidence for a difference in 5-HTT BPND between MRI scanners such that midbrain 5-HTT BPND was higher in Verio scans. Notably, only women were scanned on this scanner, who showed nominally higher midbrain BPND compared with the men considering only Trio scans in a univariate framework (male versus female midbrain BPND, Trio scans only: −0.08 (−0.22, 0.056)), which may have contributed to this difference. The resolution and quality of T1-weighted high-resolution Verio and Trio scanners are comparable, and we are therefore cautious in interpreting this observation but encourage future studies to consider potential MRI-related effects where relevant.
We observed a negative effect of age on 5-HTTLV, consistent with other PET markers of the serotonin system,50, 51, 52 corresponding to a 2–10% decrease in regional 5-HTT BPND per decade. In addition, caudate 5-HTT BPND only was significantly higher in males compared to females. We previously reported this region-specific effect considering only the Advance PET data included in the current study.19, 30 Remarkably, we observed a similar effect considering only the HRRT PET data (male versus female caudate BPND, HRRT scans only: 0.27 (0.028, 0.52), see Supplementary Table 2 for other regional estimates), providing additional evidence for our previously reported region-specific effect of sex on caudate 5-HTT BPND in an independent cohort.
Two recent studies have reported BDNF val66met effects on 5-HT4 and 5-HT1A binding in healthy adults.13, 15 It is not clear whether BDNF val66met effects stem from related or parallel genetic effects but these receptors show notably distinct neuronal distributions. The 5-HTT is primarily expressed on serotonin neurons, whereas 5-HT1A is located on non-serotonin neurons (except in raphe) and 5-HT4 is primarily expressed in striatum on interneurons and projection medium spiny neurons.53, 54 It is also not known whether BDNF val66met-induced differences emerge during development; however, this is plausible, given the prominent role in development of both systems and evidence that BDNF manipulation during development affects the serotonin system.55, 56, 57, 58 Although our findings diverge from a study in mice that reported heterozygous knockout of Bdnf decreased 5-HTT levels in hippocampus,59 we are cautious in directly comparing such findings to single-nucleotide polymorphism effects in humans because of similar divergent findings with other BDNF–serotonin associations.16, 60 Further, the net BDNF val66met effect on the serotonin system is likely best described by its effect on a broader serotonin system feature set, rather than only 5-HTT binding. As such, multitracer PET studies wherein 5-HTT, 5-HT4, 5-HT1A binding and other serotonin measures are acquired within the same individuals would provide a more complete estimate of serotonin system features, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of how serotonin signaling is regulated by BDNF val66met and other genetic or epigenetic mechanisms.
Our study is not without its limitations. Our cohort includes data pooled across studies with varying inclusion criteria. Nevertheless, all participants met a common basic criteria of general health, all data were collected and processed in the same manner, including the same quality-control checks throughout processing. Another source of heterogeneity is regionally variable scanner differences. However, BDNF val66met effects were similar when considering only HRRT scans (BDNF val66met effect on 5-HTTLV, HRRT scans only: 0.11, (0.0035, 0.22)), suggesting that our effect is not confounded by scanner effects. Although we conclude a BDNF val66met effect on 5-HTTLV and not each region independently, this can be viewed as a sensible trade-off, given compelling evidence for shared correlation across regions (Supplementary Figure 1). This indicates that the alternative, a univariate test for each region, fails to leverage shared information across regions. Consistent with this notion, we would not find evidence for a statistically significant BDNF val66met effect on any region with a univariate strategy following reasonable multiple comparison correction (Table 2). This emphasizes the value of modeling shared correlation in multivariate frameworks such as latent variable models, which is highly relevant to molecular neuroimaging where regional binding measures are often intercorrelated and effect sizes may be small.27
In summary, our findings indicate that BDNF val66met met-carriers show significantly increased subcortical 5-HTT binding (2–7% across regions) but no effect in neocortex. We replicate a negative correlation with age and evidence that males show higher BPND in caudate. These findings provide additional evidence for BDNF val66met effects on the brain serotonin system, a potential molecular mediator of its effects on behavior, personality and related risk for neuropsychiatric illness.
References
Lucki I . The spectrum of behaviors influenced by serotonin. Biol Psychiatry 1998; 44: 151–162.
Albert PR, Benkelfat C, Descarries L . The neurobiology of depression-revisiting the serotonin hypothesis. I. Cellular and molecular mechanisms. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2012; 367: 2378–2381.
Albert PR, Benkelfat C . The neurobiology of depression—revisiting the serotonin hypothesis. II. Genetic, epigenetic and clinical studies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013; 368: 20120535.
Zagrebelsky M, Korte M . Form follows function: BDNF and its involvement in sculpting the function and structure of synapses. Neuropharmacology 2014; 76 Part C:628–638.
Mattson MP, Maudsley S, Martin B . BDNF and 5-HT: a dynamic duo in age-related neuronal plasticity and neurodegenerative disorders. Trends Neurosci 2004; 27: 589–594.
Martinowich K, Lu B . Interaction between BDNF and serotonin: role in mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008; 33: 73–83.
Egan MF, Kojima M, Callicott JH, Goldberg TE, Kolachana BS, Bertolino A et al. The BDNF val66met polymorphism affects activity-dependent secretion of BDNF and human memory and hippocampal function. Cell 2003; 112: 257–269.
Hariri AR, Goldberg TE, Mattay VS, Kolachana BS, Callicott JH, Egan MF et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism affects human memory-related hippocampal activity and predicts memory performance. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 6690–6694.
Soliman F, Glatt CE, Bath KG, Levita L, Jones RM, Pattwell SS et al. A genetic variant BDNF polymorphism alters extinction learning in both mouse and human. Science 2010; 327: 863–866.
Lyons WE, Mamounas LA, Ricaurte GA, Coppola V, Reid SW, Bora SH et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-deficient mice develop aggressiveness and hyperphagia in conjunction with brain serotonergic abnormalities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 15239–15244.
Hosang GM, Shiles C, Tansey KE, McGuffin P, Uher R . Interaction between stress and the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2014; 12: 7.
Zhang L, Benedek DM, Fullerton CS, Forsten RD, Naifeh JA, Li XX et al. PTSD risk is associated with BDNF Val66Met and BDNF overexpression. Mol Psychiatry 2014; 19: 8–10.
Lan MJ, Ogden RT, Huang YY, Oquendo MA, Sullivan GM, Miller J et al. Genetic variation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met allele is associated with altered serotonin-1A receptor binding in human brain. Neuroimage 2014; 94: 33–39.
Henningsson S, Borg J, Lundberg J, Bah J, Lindström M, Ryding E et al. Genetic variation in brain-derived neurotrophic factor is associated with serotonin transporter but not serotonin-1A receptor availability in men. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66: 477–485.
Fisher PM, Holst KK, Adamsen D, Klein AB, Frokjaer VG, Jensen PS et al. BDNF Val66met and 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms predict a human in vivo marker for brain serotonin levels. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36: 313–323.
Klein AB, Trajkovska V, Erritzoe D, Haugbol S, Madsen J, Baare W et al. Cerebral 5-HT2A receptor and serotonin transporter binding in humans are not affected by the val66met BDNF polymorphism status or blood BDNF levels. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010; 30: e1–e7.
Kraus C, Baldinger P, Rami-Mark C, Gryglewski G, Kranz GS, Haeusler D et al. Exploring the impact of BDNF Val66Met genotype on serotonin transporter and serotonin-1A receptor binding. PLoS One 2014; 9: e106810.
Blakely RD, De Felice LJ, Hartzell HC . Molecular physiology of norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. J Exp Biol 1994; 196: 263–281.
Kalbitzer J, Frokjaer VG, Erritzoe D, Svarer C, Cumming P, Nielsen FA et al. The personality trait openness is related to cerebral 5-HTT levels. Neuroimage 2009; 45: 280–285.
Reimold M, Smolka MN, Schumann G, Zimmer A, Wrase J, Mann K et al. Midbrain serotonin transporter binding potential measured with [11C]DASB is affected by serotonin transporter genotype. J Neural Transm 2007; 114: 635–639.
Praschak-Rieder N, Kennedy J, Wilson AA, Hussey D, Boovariwala A, Willeit M et al. Novel 5-HTTLPR allele associates with higher serotonin transporter binding in putamen: a [(11)C] DASB positron emission tomography study. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 62: 327–331.
Parsey RV, Hastings RS, Oquendo MA, Hu X, Goldman D, Huang YY et al. Effect of a triallelic functional polymorphism of the serotonin-transporter-linked promoter region on expression of serotonin transporter in the human brain. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163: 48–51.
Murthy NV, Selvaraj S, Cowen PJ, Bhagwagar Z, Riedel WJ, Peers P et al. Serotonin transporter polymorphisms (SLC6A4 insertion/deletion and rs25531) do not affect the availability of 5-HTT to [11C] DASB binding in the living human brain. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 50–54.
Wang L, Ashley-Koch A, Steffens DC, Krishnan KR, Taylor WD . Impact of BDNF Val66Met and 5-HTTLPR polymorphism variants on neural substrates related to sadness and executive function. Genes Brain Behav 2012; 11: 352–359.
Terracciano A, Tanaka T, Sutin AR, Deiana B, Balaci L, Sanna S et al. BDNF Val66Met is associated with introversion and interacts with 5-HTTLPR to influence neuroticism. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010; 35: 1083–1089.
Knudsen GM, Jensen PS, Erritzoe D, Baare WF, Ettrup A, Fisher PM et al. The center for integrated molecular brain imaging (Cimbi) database. Neuroimage 2016; 124: 1213–1219.
Erritzoe D, Holst K, Frokjaer VG, Licht CL, Kalbitzer J, Nielsen FA et al. A nonlinear relationship between cerebral serotonin transporter and 5-HT(2A) receptor binding: an in vivo molecular imaging study in humans. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 3391–3397.
Kalbitzer J, Erritzoe D, Holst KK, Nielsen FA, Marner L, Lehel S et al. Seasonal changes in brain serotonin transporter binding in short serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region-allele carriers but not in long-allele homozygotes. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: 1033–1039.
Erritzoe D, Frokjaer VG, Haahr MT, Kalbitzer J, Svarer C, Holst KK et al. Cerebral serotonin transporter binding is inversely related to body mass index. Neuroimage 2010; 52: 284–289.
Holst KK, Budtz-Jørgensen E . Linear latent variable models: the lava-package. Comput Stat 2013; 28: 1385–1452.
Frokjaer VG, Erritzoe D, Holst KK, Jensen PS, Rasmussen PM, Fisher PM et al. Prefrontal serotonin transporter availability is positively associated with the cortisol awakening response. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013; 23: 285–294.
Frokjaer VG, Pinborg A, Holst KK, Overgaard A, Henningsson S, Heede M et al. Role of serotonin transporter changes in depressive responses to sex-steroid hormone manipulation: a positron emission tomography study. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 78: 534–543.
Mc Mahon B, Andersen SB, Madsen MK, Hjordt LV, Hageman I, Dam H et al. Seasonal difference in brain serotonin transporter binding predicts symptom severity in patients with seasonal affective disorder. Brain 2016; 139: 1605–1614.
Stenbaek DS, Fisher PM, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Pinborg A, Hjordt LV, Jensen PS et al. Sex hormone manipulation slows reaction time and increases labile mood in healthy women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016; 68: 39–46.
Madsen MK, Mc MB, Andersen SB, Siebner HR, Knudsen GM, Fisher PM . Threat-related amygdala functional connectivity is associated with 5-HTTLPR genotype and neuroticism. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2016; 11: 140–149.
Sureau FC, Reader AJ, Comtat C, Leroy C, Ribeiro MJ, Buvat I et al. Impact of image-space resolution modeling for studies with the high-resolution research tomograph. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 1000–1008.
Comtat C, Sureau FC, Sibomana M, Hong IK, Sjoholm N, Trebossen R . Image based resolution modeling for the HRRT OSEM reconstructions software. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium (Conference); 2008; 4120–4123; doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774188.
Hong IK, Chung ST, Kim HK, Kim YB, Son YD, Cho ZH . Ultra fast symmetry and SIMD-based projection-backprojection (SSP) algorithm for 3-D PET image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007; 26: 789–803.
Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC . Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16: 620–633.
Svarer C, Madsen K, Hasselbalch SG, Pinborg LH, Haugbol S, Frokjaer VG et al. MR-based automatic delineation of volumes of interest in human brain PET images using probability maps. Neuroimage 2005; 24: 969–979.
Ichise M, Liow JS, Lu JQ, Takano A, Model K, Toyama H et al. Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods: application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003; 23: 1096–1112.
Kline RB . Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd edn. The Guilford Press: New York, 2011.
Vertes RP, Fortin WJ, Crane AM . Projections of the median raphe nucleus in the rat. J Comp Neurol 1999; 407: 555–582.
Smiley JF, Goldman-Rakic PS . Serotonergic axons in monkey prefrontal cerebral cortex synapse predominantly on interneurons as demonstrated by serial section electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol 1996; 367: 431–443.
Beaudet A, Descarries L . The monoamine innervation of rat cerebral cortex: synaptic and nonsynaptic axon terminals. Neuroscience 1978; 3: 851–860.
Hu XZ, Lipsky RH, Zhu G, Akhtar LA, Taubman J, Greenberg BD et al. Serotonin transporter promoter gain-of-function genotypes are linked to obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Hum Genet 2006; 78: 815–826.
Murphy SE, Norbury R, Godlewska BR, Cowen PJ, Mannie ZM, Harmer CJ et al. The effect of the serotonin transporter polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) on amygdala function: a meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 2013; 18: 512–520.
Rhodes RA, Murthy NV, Dresner MA, Selvaraj S, Stavrakakis N, Babar S et al. Human 5-HT transporter availability predicts amygdala reactivity in vivo. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 9233–9237.
Fisher PM, Hariri AR . Linking variability in brain chemistry and circuit function through multimodal human neuroimaging. Genes Brain Behav 2012; 11: 633–642.
Madsen K, Haahr MT, Marner L, Keller SH, Baare WF, Svarer C et al. Age and sex effects on 5-HT(4) receptors in the human brain: a [(11)C]SB207145 PET study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31: 1475–1481.
Moses-Kolko EL, Price JC, Shah N, Berga S, Sereika SM, Fisher PM et al. Age, sex, and reproductive hormone effects on brain serotonin-1A and serotonin-2A receptor binding in a healthy population. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011; 36: 2729–2740.
Meltzer CC, Drevets WC, Price JC, Mathis CA, Lopresti B, Greer PJ et al. Gender-specific aging effects on the serotonin 1A receptor. Brain Res 2001; 895: 9.
Barnes NM, Sharp T . A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 1999; 38: 1083–1152.
Vilaro MT, Cortes R, Gerald C, Branchek TA, Palacios JM, Mengod G . Localization of 5-HT4 receptor mRNA in rat brain by in situ hybridization histochemistry. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1996; 43: 356–360.
Chan JP, Unger TJ, Byrnes J, Rios M . Examination of behavioral deficits triggered by targeting Bdnf in fetal or postnatal brains of mice. Neuroscience 2006; 142: 49–58.
Waterhouse EG, Xu B . New insights into the role of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in synaptic plasticity. Mol Cell Neurosci 2009; 42: 81–89.
Herlenius E, Lagercrantz H . Neurotransmitters and neuromodulators during early human development. Early Hum Dev 2001; 65: 21–37.
Homberg JR, Molteni R, Calabrese F, Riva MA . The serotonin-BDNF duo: developmental implications for the vulnerability to psychopathology. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 43: 35–47.
Guiard BP, David DJ, Deltheil T, Chenu F, Le ME, Renoir T et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor-deficient mice exhibit a hippocampal hyperserotonergic phenotype. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2008; 11: 79–92.
Rios M, Lambe EK, Liu R, Teillon S, Liu J, Akbarian S et al. Severe deficits in 5-HT2A -mediated neurotransmission in BDNF conditional mutant mice. J Neurobiol 2006; 66: 408–420.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a center grant to the Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging from The Lundbeck Foundation, the Danish Research Council and Rigshospitalets Research Fund. We thank B Dall, G Thomsen, S Larsen, A Dyssegaard and L Freyr for their assistance in scheduling and data collection at both the MR and PET centers. We gratefully acknowledge The John and Birthe Meyer Foundation for the donation of the Cyclotron and PET scanner. We acknowledge the Simon Spies Foundation for the donation of the Siemens Trio MRI scanner.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Translational Psychiatry website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, P., Ozenne, B., Svarer, C. et al. BDNF val66met association with serotonin transporter binding in healthy humans. Transl Psychiatry 7, e1029 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.295
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2016.295
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
No association between peripheral serotonin-gene-related DNA methylation and brain serotonin neurotransmission in the healthy and depressed state
Clinical Epigenetics (2024)
-
Genetic contributions to brain serotonin transporter levels in healthy adults
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
High-resolution PET imaging reveals subtle impairment of the serotonin transporter in an early non-depressed Parkinson’s disease cohort
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (2020)
-
Epistasis of HTR1A and BDNF risk genes alters cortical 5-HT1A receptor binding: PET results link genotype to molecular phenotype in depression
Translational Psychiatry (2019)