Abstract
Granule cells, rich in dendrites with densely punctated dendritic spines, are the most abundant inhibitory interneurons in the olfactory bulb. The dendritic spines of granule cells undergo remodeling during the development of the nervous system. The morphological plasticity of the spines’ response to different olfactory experiences in vivo is not fully known. In initial studies, a single granule cell in Xenopus tadpoles was labeled with GFP plasmids via cell electroporation; then, morphologic changes of the granule cell spines were visualized by in vivo confocal time-lapse imaging. With the help of long-term imaging, the total spine density, dynamics, and stability of four types of dendritic spines (mushroom, stubby, thin and filopodia) were obtained. Morphological analysis demonstrated that odor enrichment produced a remarkable increase in the spine density and stability of large mushroom spine. Then, with the help of short-term imaging, we analyzed the morphological transitions among different spines. We found that transitions between small spines (thin and filopodia) were more easily influenced by odor stimulation or olfactory deprivation. These results indicate that different olfactory experiences can regulate the morphological plasticity of different dendritic spines in the granule cell.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Inhibitory interneurons in the central nervous system undergo structural remodeling during development1,2 and under sensory experience3,4, playing an important role in the regulation of neural circuits. Granule cells are the main interneurons in the olfactory bulb. They are rich in dendrites with densely punctated dendritic spines, and they release neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) to inhibit the principal excitatory afferent neurons, the mitral and tufted cells5,6.
Dendritic spines are the most common postsynaptic sites of the vast majority of excitatory synapses in the cortex, connecting presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons7. In most CNS neurons, the spines undergo morphological and physiological changes, during early development and in adulthood, correlating with their maturation and alterations in neuronal activity. The stability of spines determines the maturity of neural circuits and the nervous system, and the maturation of spines is related to learning and memory8,9. It has been reported that the dendritic spines of granule cells in the olfactory bulb are highly dynamic during development2,10, and this synaptic connectivity is vital to odor information processing and encoding.
Sensory experiences play an important role in regulating the synaptic plasticity of dendritic spines in the cortex. Long-term imaging experiments on rodents have provided support for the experience-dependent plasticity of spine growth and retraction in the barrel cortex, the visual cortex, and the motor cortex11,12,13. Although the olfactory bulb in vertebrates is conservative—divided into the classical six layers14—the morphology of internal interneurons is difficult to observe in vivo in rodents. In the Xenopus laevis tadpole, however, aside from the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon arbors15, the granule cells of the olfactory bulb can also be used as an in vivo imaging model for the observation of synapse dynamics due to the cephalo-caudal layer pattern of the olfactory bulb in early-stage development. Based on their morphology in slices, granule cells are the only reported spiny neurons in the olfactory bulb of Xenopus16,17. Therefore, it remains an open question whether, and how, olfactory experiences regulate the synaptic plasticity of granule cells in the olfactory bulb of Xenopus in vivo.
In vivo studies have reported that dendritic spines are highly motile18,19. Most dendritic spines perform rapid extension or retraction during synaptic structure development, and long-term imaging at day-long intervals might miss some of the details. Our previous study found that there were some preferences for the transformation of spines’ morphology from one category to another on timescales from minutes to hours20. However, little is known about the roles of odor stimulation and olfactory deprivation in determining these preferences.
Through single-cell electroporation, green fluorescent protein (GFP) plasmids are expressed in granule cells, allowing the structures of all types of spines to be observed in vivo. In this study, 1) we use long-term imaging to investigate whether odor enrichment has a regulative effect on synaptic structure plasticity, including the spine density, dynamics, and stability; 2) we use short-term imaging to investigate whether odor stimulation and olfactory deprivation play different roles in spines’ morphological transitioning.
Results
Odor environment changed stability and dynamics of dendritic spines in granule cells
First, we wanted to know whether odor enrichment influenced the synaptic structure plasticity of the granule cell, including the dynamics and stability of large spines and small spines, respectively. Only tadpoles with a single labeled granule cell were stimulated by amino acid mixtures for 5 days. The dendritic spines of granule cells in the odor and control group were in vivo imaged at 1-day intervals (Fig. 1b,c serial). The stable and dynamic proportions of each type of spine were calculated and analyzed.
In proportion, large spines increased (p = 0.0165 at 2d, p = 0.0256 at 3d, p = 0.0313 at 4d, p = 0.0214 at 5d; Fig. 1d1) and small spines decreased (p = 0.0130 at 2d, p = 0.0254 at 3d, p = 0.0004 at 4d, p = 0.0222 at 5d; Fig. 1d2) after odor stimulation. The stability of the large spines significantly improved, while the stability of the small spines decreased (p = 0.0228 at 1d-2d, p = 0.0016 at 2d-3d, p = 0.0002 at 3d-4d, p < 0.0001 at 4d-5d; Fig. 1e). The percentage of the dynamic large spines tended to be lower (p = 0.0261 at 2d-3d, p = 0.0335 at 4d-5d; Fig. 1f1), and the percentage of the dynamic small spines tended to be higher (p = 0.0247 at 1d-2d, p = 0.0267 at 4d-5d; Fig. 1f2). These results suggest that the proportion of large spines increased because of an increase in large spine stabilization and the proportion of small spines decreased because of a decrease in small spine stabilization.
The long-term structural plasticity of dendritic spines was positively and negatively regulated by odor-enriched and odor-removed environment
Next, in order to obtain detailed information on the long-term morphologic plasticity of the 4 types of spines in the same granule cell before odor, during odor, and after odor wash-out treatment, we treated the same tadpole in normal raising conditions for 1 week, then in odor enrichment for 1 week, and finally in odor-removing conditions for 1 week. In parallel, we used a time-point matched control group to show the natural development of dendritic spines over 3 weeks in normal raising conditions (Fig. 2a). Finally, we obtained the in vivo time-lapse images of spines in the control and experimental groups at 2-day intervals over 3 weeks (Fig. 2b,c).
Our in vivo confocal imaging showed that the development of neurons was accompanied by a gradual increase in the number of spines. The spine density of the control group increased gradually throughout the imaging process (Fig. 2d). During the first week, the spine density of the experimental group was similar to that of the control group. In the second week, after the initial odor bathing, the spine density in the experimental group was a little higher than in the control group (p = 0.0498 on the first day, p = 0.0301 on the third day, p = 0.0064 on the fifth day, p = 0.0165 on the seventh day). Even after odor removal for 3 days, the spine density remained a little higher than the control (p = 0.0491 on the first day, p = 0.0398 on the third day). These results show that the enriched environment induced an increase in the number of spines. However, there was no obvious change in the average length of dendrites (Supplementary Fig. S1b) or branching number and pattern (Supplementary Fig. S1a), indicating that the dendritic morphology of an individual granule cell was relatively stable throughout the course of the experiment.
To explore the regulation of the four different types of spines by odor enrichment or odor removal, we calculated the percentages of dendritic spines under the normal raising, odor enrichment, and odor removal conditions. The results showed that long-term odor enrichment induced more mushroom spines (Fig. 3a4) but fewer filopodia and stubby spines (Fig. 3a1,a3). After removing the odor stimulation, the percentage of mushroom spines decreased, while the percentages of thin and stubby spines increased (Fig 3a2,3a3,a4). In the control group, the percentage of filopodia decreased continuously (Fig. 3b1), while thin spines increased slightly at first and remained stable thereafter (Fig. 3b2). The percentages of stubby and mushroom spines remained unchanged (Fig. 3b3,b4).
The stability of the four types of spines was also analyzed throughout the imaging period. Filopodia, the most unstable of the spine types, dropped to 3.72 ± 0.64% in odor enrichment and 4.58 ± 0.78% after odor removal, both markedly lower than in the control group (10.18 ± 2.19%). The stability of stubby spines was found to be 12.12 ± 1.27% in odor enrichment, also significantly lower than in the control group (19.10 ± 2.41%). Meanwhile, compared with the control group (47.17 ± 2.27%), the stability of mushroom spines increased up to 58.27 ± 1.22% in odor enrichment (Fig. 3c).
Olfactory experiences regulated the spines’ morphological transformation in a short time
Finally, to explore whether the preferences among the 4 types of spines’ morphological transformations were influenced by olfactory experiences, we observed the morphological changes of dendritic spines in the odor stimulation, olfactory deprivation, and control groups at 4-hour intervals and calculated the transformation percentages of the four spine categories. The sensory manipulation was also found to successfully regulate the neural activity of the granule cell in the calcium imaging experiments (Supplementary Fig. S2).
Spines transformation was indicated by white arrowheads at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h in the three conditions (Fig. 4a). In odor stimulation, the percentage of filopodia-to-thin transformation increased to 9.88 ± 0.41%, but filopodia-to-mushroom transformation fell to almost none (0.19 ± 0.07%). Both filopodia-to-thin (9.36 ± 0.43%) and filopodia-to-mushroom (2.18 ± 0.12%) transformation increased after olfactory deprivation (Fig. 4b). Odor enrichment increased the morphological transformation of thin spines, with 7.59 ± 0.41% transformed to filopodia and 4.01 ± 0.17% transformed to stubby spines. Olfactory input deprivation increased the percentage of thin-to-filopodia transformation (8.98 ± 0.67%) but decreased thin-to-mushroom transformation (17.41 ± 0.75%) (Fig. 4c). Odor enrichment increased the percentage of stubby-to-thin transformation (4.60 ± 0.47%). Olfactory deprivation also increased stubby-to-thin transformation (4.41 ± 0.57%), but decreased stubby-to-mushroom transformation (14.28 ± 0.92%) (Fig. 4d). The percentage of mushroom transformation remained unchanged in both odor stimulation and olfactory deprivation (Fig. 4e). All of these data demonstrate that the diverse morphological transformation preferences of the different types of spines were regulated in different ways by olfactory experiences. A diagram also summarized that olfactory experiences facilitated transformation between small spines (thin and filopodia), as well as mutual transformation between the small and large spine types (e.g., stubby to thin, filopodia to mushroom). However, transformation between the large spines (stubby and mushroom) was not influenced by sensory stimulation (Fig. 4f).
Spine addition, elimination, stabilization, and transformation were thoroughly analyzed for a comprehensive picture of the morphological plasticity at 4-hour intervals over 24 h. The data showed that among added spines, the percentage of added stubby spines was reduced in the odor group; filopodia spines were increased but mushroom spines were decreased in the olfactory deprivation group (Supplementary Fig. S3a). On the other hand, there were no differences in spine elimination among the experimental groups and the control group (Supplementary Fig. S3b). As for spine stabilization, stubby spine stability was decreased and mushroom spine stability was increased in odor enrichment; only thin spine stability was increased after olfactory deprivation (Supplementary Fig. S3c). There was no difference in spine transformation between the odor enrichment group and the control group; filopodia spines exhibited much more transformation after olfactory deprivation, while the other types showed no difference (Supplementary Fig. S3d). These results indicate that olfactory experiences had different regulatory effects on the short-term structural plasticity of spines in the granule cell, including addition, elimination, stabilization, and transformation.
Discussion
The Xenopus laeves tadpole has been widely used as an animal model for live imaging due to its good optical transparency in early developmental stages15,20,21. Rodents usually need a thinned-skull or open-skull operation for live imaging, leading to an inflammation response22 or increased imaging depth and reduced quality of imaging. By contrast, the olfactory bulb—the transparent and superficial structure in the brain of the tadpole—becomes a unique advantage for the live imaging of individual neurons for noninvasive studies23. At the same time, single-cell electroporation labeling allows the dendritic spines of a single neuron to be visualized in vivo. Long-term live imaging in the OB in mammals has always been technically challenging, but the imaging methods used in tadpoles make it a much easier process. Compared with previous methods24,25, in vivo time-lapse imaging with subcellular resolution over a period of weeks was accomplished easily in tadpoles in our study, without any surgery or invasive operations.
In order to adjust to novel sensory experiences, odor information processing in the olfactory bulb relies on the synaptic connectivity remolding of interneurons, such as the dendritic spines of granule cells, establishing the framework for connectivity. The morphological plasticity of granule cell dendritic spines induced by olfactory experiences demands more attention. Due to the difficulty in labeling and in vivo imaging of olfactory neurons in rodents, few studies were conducted on the spine plasticity of granule cells in the rodent olfactory bulb. Besides, studies on the plasticity of adult-born granule cells in the rodent olfactory bulb2,10 do not explain how granule cell spines’ plasticity is influenced by long-term odor enrichment or how the morphological transitions among different spines are influenced by short-term olfactory manipulations. Small dendritic spines (filopodia and thin) constantly appear and disappear in a highly dynamic process, identified as the generation of new synapses. Large dendritic spines (stubby and mushroom), associated with memory storage, are relatively stable in the neural network26. Our long-term (Figs 1 and 2) and short-term (Fig. 4) in vivo imaging provides visual evidence of the regulation of spines’ morphological plasticity by olfactory experiences.
It has commonly been believed that the processes of spine addition, pruning and stabilization are driven by sensory experiences in the rodent cortex12,13,27,28. But most of these studies have not distinguished between the different influences that sensory experience exerts on small and large spines. In our in vivo imaging, immature small spines turned out to be more dynamic and mature large spines more stable in an odor enrichment environment (Figs 1 and 3c), revealing that the sensory experience-dependent morphological plasticity of spines in the granule cell differed depending on the spine category. Overall, small spines were more dynamic and large spines were more stable, which was consistent with the cortical observations reported in rodents11,29.
The stable synaptic connection is an important foundation in the mature nervous system28,29. The increase in the percentage of mushroom spines and decrease in filopodia and stubby spines (Fig. 3a1,3a3,a4) indicated that odor enrichment could promote spines’ maturation. An enriched environment over a period of weeks to months has been reported to promote sensory experience-dependent or motor activity-dependent stability of newly formed spines for lifelong memory storage9. Our results show obvious increases in the stability of mushroom spines and decreases in other types of spines (Fig. 3c), indicating that odor enrichment could improve the large spines’ stabilization. Moreover, it is presumable that the stability of the spines mainly comes from the increased percentage of stable large spines induced by odor enrichment, especially mushroom spines (Figs 1e and 3c). However, the partial recovery in the proportion and stability of spines caused by odor removal (Fig. 3a,c) implies that the newly established “memory” mushroom spines induced by odor enrichment are not stable enough. These results suggest that the persistent storage of neural information is based on the maintenance of synaptic connectivity and efficacy, which ought to be based on the structural stability of spines.
The number of dendritic spines and synapse densities can alter under the action of sensory experience. Odor enrichment in tadpoles led to an obvious increase in spine density (Fig. 2d), supporting the idea that the structural dynamics of dendritic spines are influenced by environmental enrichment30,31,32. A point to be noted is that the percentage of mushroom spines decreased, while the percentages of thin and stubby spines increased after odor removal (Fig. 3a2,3a3,a4)—suggesting that the influence exerted by sensory stimulation can be weakened somewhat once the stimulation is removed.
Morphological transitions among different spines can change dynamically in a short time. Among the morphologically altered dendritic protrusions, small spines tend to disappear entirely or transform between filopodia and thin spines, while large spines tend to transform their morphological structures rather than be lost directly20. In our study, odor enrichment and olfactory deprivation promoted increased transformation between filopodia and thin spines (Fig. 4b,c), revealing that sensory experiences increase the dynamic property of dendritic spines and result in faster changes in synaptic connections, especially in small spines. The tendency of the highly dynamic filopodia spine to directly disappear or transform into other spines33,34 explains its gradually decreasing percentage over our 3 weeks of imaging (Fig. 3b1). Additionally, the increasing transformation between the thin and stubby spines (Fig. 4c,d) in odor enrichment suggests that abundant olfactory stimulation facilitates the mutual transformation between the small and large spine types. Meanwhile, the lack of influence exerted by odor enrichment on transformation between stubby and mushroom spines (Fig. 4d,e) implies that the existing large spines are relatively mature, so that moderate and short-term olfactory stimulation is not enough to induce more morphological changes between stubby and mushroom spines. The high number of synaptic vesicles in the presynaptic membrane and high PSD95 in the postsynaptic sides of stubby and mushroom spines18,20 has also confirmed the presence of mature synapses in these spines. Furthermore, there is no significant difference in the transformation of mushroom spines (Fig. 4e) into the three other types in either odor enrichment or olfactory deprivation, revealing that the mushroom spine is more likely to retain its existing synaptic connections than to be easily affected by olfactory experiences. This is consistent with the low rate of transformation between mushroom spines and other spine categories observed in long-term in vivo two-photon imaging over months19.
Conclusions
Taken together, our long-term and short-term in vivo imaging have confirmed that olfactory experiences are able to regulate the spine structural plasticity of olfactory bulb granule cells in Xenopus, revealing that the morphological plasticity of different types of dendritic spines is the basis of synaptic connectivity and efficacy in the interneurons of the early olfactory system and is vital to olfactory information processing and encoding.
Methods
Animals
Adult albino X. laevis (Nasco, Fort Atkinson, WI, USA) were induced to ovulate by subcutaneously injecting human chorionic gonadotropin (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis MO, USA). Embryos were obtained by in vitro fertilization and maintained in a modified rearing (MR) solution [60 mM NaCl, 0.67 mM KCl, 0.34 mM Ca(NO3)2, 0.83 mM MgSO4, 10 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 40 mg/l gentamycin, pH 7.4~7.6]35. All tadpoles were reared under filtered illumination in 12 h dark/light cycles and staged according to staging tables36. During imaging and injections, tadpoles were anesthetized with 0.02% ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate (MS222) (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis MO, USA). All the animal manipulations were conducted in strict accordance with the guidelines and regulations set forth by the University of Science and Technology of China Animal Resources Center and University Animal Care and Use Committee; the protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the USTC (Permit Number: USTCACUC1102012).
In vivo single-cell electroporation and single granule cell labeling
The granule cell in the Xenopus olfactory bulb was labeled with plasmid DNA by single-cell electroporation in vivo20,37. 0.5–0.8 μg/μl GFP plasmid mixed with 0.05 mM Alexa Fluor® 594 Hydrazide, a red fluorescent dye (A10438, Invitrogen, USA), were co-electroporated into the olfactory granule cell layer. After 2 days, tadpoles with a single spiny neuron expressing GFP throughout their cell bodies, dendrites, and spines were selected for in vivo imaging.
Imaging and data analysis
The morphological changes of the granule cell were followed with time-lapse confocal microscopy in stage 48–51 tadpoles. The anesthetized tadpoles were embedded in low-melting agarose (2%, Sigma) for imaging20,24. Images were obtained using a water-immersion objective lens (60 × /0.90 w) on a Fluoview FV1000 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Olympus, Japan) equipped with Argon (488 nm excitation). Confocal images of the entire dendritic spines in the neuron were obtained below saturation levels, with minimal gain and contrast enhancements. For the long-term in vivo imaging, stacks were collected every day over 5 days and every other day over 3 weeks. For the short-term in vivo imaging, stacks were collected at 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, and 24 h. Tadpoles were immediately released into MR solution for revival between imaging sessions.
The morphology of spines was divided into four categories—filopodia, thin, stubby, and mushroom—based on the approximate measurements, according to the previously described criteria38,39,40. Filopodia and thin spines were classified as small spines, while stubby and mushroom spines were identified as large spines29. Branched spines were not included in the statistics, given the limited number of cases.
The entire lengths of dendrites were used for quantitative analysis. All image analysis was based on the raw data of confocal imaging. Digital three-dimensional reconstructions of confocal stacks were obtained from individual optical sections using Imaris 7.0.1 (Bitplane, Switzerland). Thin optical sections (1.0 μm) through the entire extent of the dendrite were collected to gain high image quality. The values of green channel pixel intensity were between 50 and 255. The three-dimensional projection could be freely rotated and magnified using the Surfaces module to view the spines on the Z-axis or behind the overlap region. The definitions and classifications of spine morphology were applied through the Imaris Filament module. The AutoPath mode of the Filament module was used to trace the dendritic arbors of a neuron. The Manual option was used to trace dendritic spines based on the dendritic framework, with the four different kinds of spines assigned four different colors.
Several index parameters were measured and calculated to obtain detailed information on the 4 types of dendritic spines at each time interval: spine density (the number of spines per unit arbor length), spine addition (the proportion of added spines compared to previously observed ones), spine elimination (the proportion of eliminated spines compared to previously observed ones), spine dynamics (the mean value of spines addition and spines elimination), spine stability (the proportion of stable spines compared to previously observed ones). The number following the ± sign was a standard error (SEM). Statistical analyses were reported as mean ± SEM using two-sample unpaired t-tests and one-way ANOVA Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (GraphPad Prism 5.0, USA), with a significance of p < 0.05 indicated by an asterisk, p < 0.01 indicated by two asterisks, and p < 0.001 indicated by three asterisks.
Odor stimulus application
As odorants, amino acids (Supplementary Table S1) were dissolved in the MR solution to create 200 μM work solution. All of the amino acids were used in one mixture for odor stimulation41,42,43,44. For the long-term morphological imaging, tadpoles were continuously exposed for several days, and a static-renewal procedure was applied, with complete odor solution exchange every 24 h.
Olfactory deprivation
After tadpoles were anesthetized, tiny fissures on the skin over the olfactory nerves were made with a silver needle under a binocular stereo microscope (Olympus, Japan). Then, the olfactory nerves were cut off completely using Vannas scissors (66VT, China) to block sensory input to the olfactory bulb. After surgery, specimens were reared in MR solution for recovery.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Zhang, L. et al. Olfactory experiences dynamically regulate plasticity of dendritic spines in granule cells of Xenopus tadpoles in vivo. Sci. Rep. 6, 35009; doi: 10.1038/srep35009 (2016).
References
Chen, J. L., Flanders, G. H., Lee, W. C. A., Lin, W. C. & Nedivi, E. Inhibitory Dendrite Dynamics as a General Feature of the Adult Cortical Microcircuit. Journal of Neuroscience 31, 12437–12443 (2011).
Mizrahi, A. Dendritic development and plasticity of adult-born neurons in the mouse olfactory bulb. Nat Neurosci 10, 444–452 (2007).
Sun, Q. Q. Experience-Dependent Intrinsic Plasticity in Interneurons of Barrel Cortex Layer IV. Journal of Neurophysiology 102, 2955–2973 (2009).
Chen, J. L. et al. Structural basis for the role of inhibition in facilitating adult brain plasticity. Nature Neuroscience 14, 587–U73 (2011).
Nagayama, S., Homma, R. & Imamura, F. Neuronal organization of olfactory bulb circuits. Frontiers in Neural Circuits 8 (2014).
Kosaka, T. & Kosaka, K. “Interneurons” in the olfactory bulb revisited. Neurosci Res 69, 93–99 (2011).
Alvarez, V. A. & Sabatini, B. L. Anatomical and physiological plasticity of dendritic spines. Annual Review of Neuroscience 30, 79–97 (2007).
Fu, M. & Zuo, Y. Experience-dependent structural plasticity in the cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 34, 177–187 (2011).
Yang, G., Pan, F. & Gan, W. B. Stably maintained dendritic spines are associated with lifelong memories. Nature 462, 920–924 (2009).
Matsutani, S. & Yamamoto, N. Postnatal development of dendritic spines on olfactory bulb granule cells in rats. J Comp Neurol 473, 553–561 (2004).
Holtmaat, A. & Svoboda, K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10, 647–658 (2009).
Trachtenberg, J. T. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002).
Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Knott, G. W., Welker, E. & Svoboda, K. Experience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex. Nature 441, 979–983 (2006).
Lledo, P. M., Gheusi, G. & Vincent, J. D. Information processing in the mammalian olfactory system. Physiol Rev 85, 281–317 (2005).
Hu, B., Nikolakopoulou, A. M. & Cohen-Cory, S. BDNF stabilizes synapses and maintains the structural complexity of optic axons in vivo. Development 132, 4285–4298 (2005).
Lin, B. J., Chen, T. W. & Schild, D. Cell type-specific relationships between spiking and [Ca2+](i) in neurons of the Xenopus tadpole olfactory bulb. Journal of Physiology-London 582, 163–175 (2007).
Scheidweiler, U., Nezlin, L., Rabba, J., Muller, B. & Schild, D. Slice culture of the olfactory bulb of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Chemical Senses 26, 399–407 (2001).
Harris, K. M. Structure, development, and plasticity of dendritic spines. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9, 343–348 (1999).
Holtmaat, A. J. G. D. et al. Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo. Neuron 45, 279–291 (2005).
Huang, Y. B., Hu, C. R., Zhang, L., Yin, W. & Hu, B. In Vivo Study of Dynamics and Stability of Dendritic Spines on Olfactory Bulb Interneurons in Xenopus laevis Tadpoles. Plos One 10, e0140752 (2015).
Alsina, B., Vu, T. & Cohen-Cory, S. Visualizing synapse formation in arborizing optic axons in vivo: dynamics and modulation by BDNF. Nature Neuroscience 4, 1093–1101 (2001).
Davalos, D. et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nature Neuroscience 8, 752–758 (2005).
Manzini, I. From neurogenesis to neuronal regeneration: the amphibian olfactory system as a model to visualize neuronal development in vivo. Neural Regeneration Research 10, 872–874 (2015).
Ruthazer, E. S. et al. In vivo time-lapse imaging of neuronal development in Xenopus. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2013, 804–809 (2013).
Gu, L. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of dendritic spines in the hippocampus reveals structural plasticity. J Neurosci 34, 13948–13953 (2014).
Kasai, H., Fukuda, M., Watanabe, S., Hayashi-Takagi, A. & Noguchi, J. Structural dynamics of dendritic spines in memory and cognition. Trends in Neurosciences 33, 121–129 (2010).
Mataga, N., Mizuguchi, Y. & Hensch, T. K. Experience-dependent pruning of dendritic spines in visual cortex by tissue plasminogen activator. Neuron 44, 1031–1041 (2004).
Zuo, Y., Lin, A., Chang, P. & Gan, W. B. Development of long-term dendritic spine stability in diverse regions of cerebral cortex. Neuron 46, 181–189 (2005).
Kasai, H., Matsuzaki, M., Noguchi, J., Yasumatsu, N. & Nakahara, H. Structure-stability-function relationships of dendritic spines. Trends in Neurosciences 26, 360–368 (2003).
Kim, B. G., Dai, H. N., McAtee, M. & Bregman, B. S. Modulation of dendritic spine remodeling in the motor cortex following spinal cord injury: Effects of environmental enrichment and combinatorial treatment with transplants and neurotrophin-3. Journal of Comparative Neurology 508, 473–486 (2008).
Jung, C. K. E. & Herms, J. Structural Dynamics of Dendritic Spines are Influenced by an Environmental Enrichment: An In Vivo Imaging Study. Cerebral Cortex 24, 377–384 (2014).
Kolb, B., Cioe, J. & Comeau, W. Contrasting effects of motor and visual spatial learning tasks on dendritic arborization and spine density in rats. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 90, 295–300 (2008).
Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N. & Gan, W. B. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 420, 812–816 (2002).
Gan, W. B., Yang, G. & Pan, F. Experience-dependent dendritic spine dynamics in the mouse cortex. Neuroscience Research 65, S7–S7 (2009).
Keller, R. Early embryonic development of Xenopus laevis. Methods Cell Biol 36, 61–113 (1991).
Nieuwkoop. Normal table of Xenopus laevis. The Netherlands: Elsevier North Holland (1956).
Bestman, J. E., Ewald, R. C., Chiu, S. L. & Cline, H. T. In vivo single-cell electroporation for transfer of DNA and macromolecules. Nature Protocols 1, 1267–1272 (2006).
Nimchinsky, E. A., Sabatini, B. L. & Svoboda, K. Structure and function of dendritic spines. Annual Review of Physiology 64, 313–353 (2002).
Harris, K. M., Jensen, F. E. & Tsao, B. Three-dimensional structure of dendritic spines and synapses in rat hippocampus (CA1) at postnatal day 15 and adult ages: implications for the maturation of synaptic physiology and long-term potentiation. J Neurosci 12, 2685–2705 (1992).
Hering, H. & Sheng, M. Dendritic spines: structure, dynamics and regulation. Nat Rev Neurosci 2, 880–888 (2001).
Caprio, J. & Byrd, R. P. Electrophysiological Evidence for Acidic, Basic, and Neutral Amino-Acid Olfactory Receptor-Sites in the Catfish. Journal of General Physiology 84, 403–422 (1984).
Czesnik, D., Rossler, W., Kirchner, F., Gennerich, A. & Schild, D. Neuronal representation of odourants in the olfactory bulb of Xenopus laevis tadpoles. European Journal of Neuroscience 17, 113–118 (2003).
Manzini, I. & Schild, D. cAMP-independent olfactory transduction of amino acids in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Journal of Physiology-London 551, 115–123 (2003).
Manzini, I., Brase, C., Chen, T. W. & Schild, D. Response profiles to amino acid odorants of olfactory glomeruli in larval Xenopus laevis. Journal of Physiology-London 581, 567–579 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Guoqiang Bi for the gift of the GCamp6f construct. We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript. This research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (91132724, U1332136 and 30870833).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: L.Z., Y.H. and B.H. Performed the experiments: L.Z. and B.H. Analyzed the data: L.Z. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: L.Z., Y.H. and B.H. Wrote the paper: L.Z., Y.H. and B.H.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Huang, Y. & Hu, B. Olfactory experiences dynamically regulate plasticity of dendritic spines in granule cells of Xenopus tadpoles in vivo. Sci Rep 6, 35009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35009
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35009
- Springer Nature Limited