Abstract
Background
Strategies toward HIV-1 cure aim to clear, inactivate, reduce, or immunologically control the virus from a pool of latently infected cells such that combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) can be safely interrupted. In order to assess the impact of any putative curative interventions on the size and inducibility of the latent HIV-1 reservoir, robust and scalable assays are needed to precisely quantify the frequency of infected cells containing inducible HIV-1.
Methods
We developed Specific Quantification of Inducible HIV−1 by RT-LAMP (SQuHIVLa), leveraging the high sensitivity and specificity of RT-LAMP, performed in a single reaction, to detect and quantify cells expressing tat/rev HIV-1 multiply spliced RNA (msRNA) upon activation. The LAMP primer/probe used in SQuHIVLa was designed to exclusively detect HIV-1 tat/rev msRNA and adapted for different HIV-1 subtypes.
Results
Using SQuHIVLa, we successfully quantify the inducible viral reservoir in CD4+ T cells from people living with HIV-1 subtypes B and C on cART. The assay demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility.
Conclusions
SQuHIVLa offers a high throughput, scalable, and specific HIV-1 reservoir quantification tool that is amenable to resource-limited settings. This assay poses remarkable potential in facilitating the evaluation of potential interventional strategies toward achieving HIV-1 cure.
Plain language summary
HIV infection remains challenging because the virus hides in certain cells, making it invisible to the immune system. This hidden virus forms what is called a latent HIV reservoir. If someone with HIV stops their antiviral therapy, the virus quickly re-emerges. Because of this, researchers are exploring various strategies to eliminate this reservoir and cure HIV. To evaluate these strategies, we need a method to measure the reservoir’s size before and after trials. Our study introduces SQuHIVLa, a highly sensitive and specific method for quantifying the latent reservoir. SQuHIVLa could become a vital tool for monitoring HIV patients and assessing treatment effectiveness, bringing us closer to finding a cure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has changed human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection from a lethal to a chronic illness. However, despite over 40 years of research, there is currently no safe, scalable, curative therapy in sight. Furthermore, HIV-1 treatment disparities persist, notably in sub-Saharan Africa, where 70% of individuals with HIV-1 reside1, and only 78% of them with access to treatment2. Although cART effectively reduces circulating virus to undetectable levels, the integrated provirus persists within immune cells, primarily resting memory CD4+ T cells, constituting the viral reservoir3,4. Discontinuation of suppressive cART may prompt reactivation of the inducible replication-competent HIV-1 provirus, resulting in exponential replication and detectable viremia (viral rebound). This typically occurs within several weeks, with a mean of two weeks, in a majority of individuals5. Lifelong therapy is thus necessary to maintain viral suppression and interventions beyond cART are urgently needed to achieve an HIV-1 cure.
Toward this aim, several strategies that target the latent viral reservoir for clearance or control are being explored6,7. Reliable biomarkers are crucial to understanding reservoir persistence and evaluating the impact of interventions. Furthermore, robust, precise, and high throughput and, scalable assays capable of measuring the frequency of infected cells containing inducible HIV-1 are required8. However, the low frequency of these cells, estimated at between 1 and 1000 per million CD4+ T cells9 makes quantification extremely challenging, highlighting the need for innovative solutions to identify, target and quantify the viral reservoir.
Numerous techniques have been proposed, developed, or used to measure the HIV-1 reservoir10 11,12. Quantitative viral outgrowth assays that measure the replication-competent viral reservoir however underestimate the size13,14. PCR-based assays offer a more practical method to determine the frequency of cells containing total or integrated HIV-1 DNA15,16. However, these assays considerably overestimate the size of the viral reservoir. By targeting a single highly conserved proviral region, defective HIV-1 genomes with substantial deletions or hypermutations in places other than the test amplicon can also be detected13,17. Recent advancements address this challenge by introducing assays detecting multiple conserved HIV-1 genome regions. The intact proviral DNA assay (IPDA)18, for example, targets the packaging signal (PSI) and env-RRE regions using digital droplet (dd)PCR technology. Although conventional IPDA is effective in excluding the majority of defective viruses, it targets a very small sub-genomic region (2% of the HIV-1 genome), which can lead to an overestimation of the viral reservoir19. Adapted multiplex versions of IPDA include additional targets20,21 whereas some methods like Q4PCR, combining quadruplex qPCR and next-generation sequencing22. While these assays have revealed novel insights into HIV-1 proviral landscape dynamics, they are expensive, labor-intensive, and require sophisticated equipment, making them unsuitable for use in large-scale clinical trials, especially in resource-limited settings. Additionally, they exhibit high fail rates due to HIV-1 sequence polymorphisms23,24 and near-full-length genome sequencing methods may introduce a quantification bias25. Importantly, proviral DNA sequence intactness alone is not a direct measure of inducibility, which greatly depends on the site of viral integration and therein the potential for viral transcription13,26,27,28,29,30,31,32.
Novel culture-based techniques have emerged as potential alternates for estimating the inducible viral reservoir size. These methods involve the activation of CD4+ T cells from virally suppressed individuals, allowing direct measurement of HIV-1 RNA from cell extracts (cell-associated RNA, ca-RNA)33,34,35,36 or cell culture supernatants (cell-free RNA, cf-RNA)33,34. However, cf-RNA quantification may not accurately assess replication-competency as it only reflects the capacity to generate and release viral RNA33,37. Inducible ca-RNA assays involve the potent activation of CD4+ T cells, enabling ultrasensitive PCR quantification of different RNA species including unspliced RNA (usRNA)33,38, multiply spliced RNA (msRNA)35,36,39, mature RNA transcripts with poly-A tails38,40, TAR RNAs41, and chimeric host-HIV-1 transcripts38,39 can be quantified by RT-qPCR or RT-ddPCR methods. Since tat/rev msRNA transcripts are generated after splicing of full-length viral transcripts, they have been found to be a meaningful indicator of viral replication following latency reversal39,42,43,44,45. By detecting tat/rev msRNA therefore, the likelihood of measuring proviruses with large internal deletions is greatly reduced13. Inducible HIV-1 RNA assays can be conducted in a limiting dilution format, such as the tat/rev Limiting Dilution Assay (TILDA)35,46, or at single-cell level by, for example, detection of HIV-1 usRNA and/or msRNA using fluorescent in situ hybridization assays coupled to flow cytometry (FISH-flow)47,48. While FISH-flow provides a deeper understanding of the viral reservoir molecular characteristics and phenotypic heterogeneity47,48,49 it still requires substantial cell input and time, making it less suitable for large-scale clinical trials, favoring the use of bulk or serial-diluted sample measurements using quantitative real-time or digital PCR methods in most clinical studies50.
HIV-1 RNA quantification typically relies on single-round or semi-nested RT-qPCR, with the latter offering advantages for low-copy samples and a wider dynamic range39. However, quantifying HIV-1 RNA in limiting dilution formats considerably increases the cost. Moreover, the instrument-intensive amplification procedure, long turnaround time, and high risk of cross-contamination from manual handling of the pre-amplified product in semi-nested RT-qPCR protocols, limit assay application in large clinical trials, especially in resource-constrained settings51.
To address these technical limitations, reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) could be used as a highly sensitive, less expensive, and time-saving alternative to semi-nested RT-qPCR52. Utilizing two polymerase enzymes, RT-LAMP achieves reverse transcription and amplification in a single reaction, minimizing cross-contamination risks. RT-LAMP has been successfully used in multiple studies to detect low copies of viral RNA for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, demonstrating comparable or better sensitivity than conventional RT-qPCR53,54,55,56. Additionally, by binding six to eight different DNA regions, RT-LAMP is more specific than semi-nested PCR, which targets three regions. Although RT-LAMP has the potential to be a less expensive and robust alternative to (semi-nested) RT-qPCR or RT-ddPCR57, it has thus far only been used for qualitative HIV-1 RNA detection in blood plasma58,59,60 and not yet in the context of HIV-1 reservoir quantification. Here, we present SQuHIVLa (Specific Quantification of Inducible HIV-1 reservoir by RT-LAMP), an RT-LAMP-based assay to detect cells expressing tat/rev msRNA, addressing the gap in HIV-1 reservoir quantification. We successfully designed LAMP primer/probe sets specifically for detecting tat/rev msRNA of HIV-1 subtypes B and C, while ensuring no amplification occurs from intron-containing tat/rev HIV-1 proviral DNA. Extensive experimental validations confirm that this innovative RT-LAMP based assay, named SQuHIVLa, demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in exclusively amplifying tat/rev msRNA, minimizing the probability of false positives. Finally, we successfully quantify the frequency of tat/rev msRNA-expressing cells as a surrogate marker for inducible HIV-1 reservoir size using SQuHIVLa in CD4+ T cells obtained from PLWH with various clinical characteristics. Therefore, SQuHIVLa provides a robust and scalable tool for accurately assessing the size and inducibility of latent HIV-1 reservoirs, which is crucial for evaluating the efficacy of potential HIV-1 cure interventions.
Methods
Cohort characteristics
Peripheral blood samples from 34 people living with HIV-1 (PLWH), 15 subtype B, and 19 subtype C were used in this study. All 34 PLWH included in this study were older than 18 years of age and on fully suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), initiated during chronic stages of HIV-1 infection, with plasma HIV-1 RNA below detectable levels for at least twelve months. Additional clinical information is shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 5.
Ethical statement
Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants. The Medical Ethical Council of the Erasmus Medical Center (MEC-2012–583) and the University of KwaZulu-Natal (REF: E036/06) approved the use of clinical material for research purposes.
Sample collection
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from whole blood or leukapheresis samples using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation and cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen until further use. CD4+ T cells were isolated from thawed PBMCs by negative magnetic selection using the EasySep Human CD4 T Cell Enrichment Kit (STEMCELL Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Designing of tat/rev RNA-specific LAMP primer/probe sets
A detailed protocol for designing HIV-1 tat/rev msRNA-specific LAMP primers and probes is provided in Supplementary Note 1. Briefly, ten complete HIV-1 genome sequences for both HIV-1 subtype B and subtype C, submitted from various geographical locations and from different years, were obtained from the Los Alamos HIV sequence databases (https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/)61 (GenBank Accession numbers of the sequences used to design subtype B and C tat/rev msRNA LAMP primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1). The sequences were aligned using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software version 11 (MEGA11)62. A consensus in silico-spliced tat/rev DNA sequence was generated using this alignment, converted to a FASTA file, and used to generate preliminary sets of LAMP primers using the online program PrimerExplorer V5 (http://primerexplorer.jp/e/). Selected LAMP primers, based on criteria that we have identified to be crucial to ensure precise detection of tat/rev msRNA transcripts, were aligned to the complete HIV-1 genome alignment to assess primer-target sequence complementarity. To broaden the detection of multiple strains within a particular HIV-1 subtype, the primer binding regions with mutations present at sites extremely important for amplification were avoided by shifting these regions several nucleotides up or downstream. Melting temperature and distance between primer binding regions were adjusted to ensure that the modifications still met the LAMP primer specifications. Additionally, loop primers were generated using the PrimerExplorer V5 software, and one of these (e.g., Loop forward primer) was converted into a self-quenching probe with an internal FAM fluorophore bound to the closest thymidine from the 3′ end63.
RT-LAMP assay validation using in vitro tat/rev RNA transcripts
A gBlock comprising a spliced tat/rev sequence (subtype B or C), downstream of a T7 promoter sequence (generated by IDT) was used as a template for in vitro transcription using Hi-T7 RNA Polymerase and Ribonucleotide Solution Mix (both from NEB) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequences of the subtype B and subtype C-specific tat/rev gBlocks are listed in Supplementary Table 3. To eliminate gBlock DNA, in vitro-transcribed tat/rev RNA samples were treated with RNase-free DNase I (NEB) and purified using the Monarch® RNA Cleanup Kit (NEB). Each purified sample of tat/rev RNA underwent quantification five times using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). The average values of the quantity for each sample, along with their respective lengths (509 bp for subtype B and 483 bp for subtype C tat/rev RNA), were employed to determine the number of RNA copies per microliter of the samples using NEBioCalculator (https://nebiocalculator.neb.com). Subsequently, the samples were serially diluted to achieve concentrations of 1000, 500, 250, 125, 50, 20, 10, 5, 1, and 0.1 copies of RNA per 5 μL. These diluted samples were utilized in validation experiments to assess the sensitivity of the RT-LAMP reactions. Reactions without the RTx enzyme were performed to assess the specificity of the RT-LAMP assay in an exclusively amplifying RNA template. The amplification was carried out in a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System thermocycler (Bio-Rad) following a thermal program of continuous 65 °C with fluorescence read every 30 s for 240 cycles, which corresponds to 120 min of amplification time. Complete details of the RT-LAMP reagents and conditions for reaction are listed in Supplementary Table 4. Positive reactions were identified by the presence of fluorescence curves exceeding the cutoff line and analyzed using.
RT-LAMP-based detection of tat/rev msRNA in J-Lat 11.1 cells
Latent HIV-1-infected Jurkat cells (clone J-Lat 11.1), which harbor a fully integrated HIV-1 subtype B genome with a mutated env gene and a GFP reporter gene in place of nef, which requires multiple splicing64, served as a surrogate for inducible reservoir cells. J-Lat 11.1 cells were kindly provided by Eric Verdin from the Buck Institute for Research on Aging. Single J-Lat 11.1 cells in the background of uninfected donor CD4+ T cells were used for the validation of RT-LAMP-based detection of tat/rev msRNA. J-Lat 11.1 cells were cultured in complete RPMI-1640 media, supplemented with 7% FBS and 100 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin, and primary CD4+ T cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin. J-Lat 11.1 cells were stimulated with 10 μM of phorbol 12 myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (Sigma) for 12 h and primary CD4+ T cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL of PMA (Sigma) and 1 µg/mL of ionomycin (Sigma) for 12 h as mentioned elsewhere35. Activated uninfected donor-derived primary CD4+ T cells were washed twice in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 3% FBS, counted using Countess II (Thermo Fisher), and serially diluted to 4 × 105, 2 × 105, 1 × 105, 5 × 104, and 2.5 × 104 cells/mL in PBS. 5 µL of cell suspension from each dilution was mixed with 15 µL RT-LAMP master mix (Supplementary Table 4) and added to the PCR plate (Bio-Rad) in order to generate an increasing background of activated uninfected donor CD4+ T cells (8 × 104, 4 × 104, 2 × 104, 1 × 104, and 5 × 103 cells/ 20 µL reaction, respectively). 5 µL of nuclease-free water was used instead of cell suspension to prepare PCR wells without any cell background. Activated J-Lat 11.1 cells were also washed twice in RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 3% FBS, and resuspended in PBS. A single GFP+ J-Lat 11.1 cell (marking a tat/rev msRNA+ cell) was sorted directly into each well of a 96-well PCR plate (Bio-Rad) containing 20 µL RT-LAMP master mix, without cells or with an increasing background of activated uninfected donor CD4+ T cells. The final reaction volume was maintained at 20 µL after the single-cell sorting as the sorted volume is negligible. RT-LAMP was conducted following a thermal program of continuous 65 °C with fluorescence read every 30 s for 180 cycles, which corresponds to 90 min of amplification time.
Validating specificity for tat/rev HIV-1 msRNA by RT-LAMP
After 12 h stimulation of J-Lat 11.1 with PMA (see above)35 either a single GFP+ or a single GFP− J-Lat 11.1 cell was sorted directly into each well of a 96-well PCR plate containing complete RT-LAMP master mix or the master mix without the reverse transcriptase (RT). RT-LAMP was conducted following the same conditions mentioned above. In order to compare the specificity of RT-LAMP that utilizes exon-spanning msRNA specific LAMP primers/probe with semi-nested RT-qPCR that utilizes non-exon-spanning primers/probe reported in previous study35, a single GFP+ or GFP− J-Lat 11.1 cell was sorted directly into each well of a 96-well PCR plate and a semi-nested RT-qPCR was performed using previously reported reaction-mixes and thermal protocols65.
Genomic DNA was isolated from PMA-stimulated J-Lat 11.1 cells using the phenol–chloroform-isoamyl alcohol isolation method and ethanol precipitation in the presence of glycogen as a carrier. Isolated DNA was treated with DNase-free Monarch® RNase A (New England Biolabs) to get rid of any RNA contamination. Total RNA was also isolated from PMA-stimulated J-Lat 11.1 cells using Trizol reagent (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Isolated RNA was treated with RNase-free DNase I to get rid of any DNA contamination. 100 ng of DNase-treated RNA, 100 ng of RNase-treated DNA, and 100 copies of HIV-1 plasmid pNL4-3.Luc.R-E- were used as a template to perform semi-nested RT-qPCR following previously published protocol65 and RT-LAMP on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System thermocycler (Bio-Rad) following a thermal program mentioned above.
SQuHIVLa validation for viral reservoir quantification
Next, we used SQuHIVLa to quantify the inducible reservoir in experimental samples that represent clinically observed reservoir size including 0.1, 1, 10, and 20 cells/million CD4+ T cells. To prepare these custom experimental samples, J-Lat 11.1 cells and CD4+ T cells derived from uninfected donor PBMCs were cultured and stimulated following the same procedure mentioned in the previous section. After stimulation, CD4+ T cells were washed, counted using an automated cell counter (Countess II, Thermo Fisher) and four tubes containing 10 million CD4+ T cells resuspended in 10 mL of RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 3% FBS (1 million CD4+ cells/mL) were prepared. A range of 1, 10, 100, or 200 GFP + J-Lat 11.1 cells were sorted into each tube generating custom test samples representative of clinical samples with an inducible HIV-1 subtype B reservoir of 0.1, 1, 10, 20 cells/million CD4+ T cells. The cells in each tube were then washed, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then serially diluted to 4 × 106 cells/ml, 2 × 106 cells/ml, 1 × 106 cells/ml, and 5 × 105 cells/ml in PBS. From each dilution, 5 µL of the cell suspension was distributed to 22–24 wells of a 96-well plate containing 15 µL RT-LAMP master mix (Supplementary Table 4) corresponding to 20,000, 5000, 1250, and 313 cells per well, similar to the previously reported study by Procopio et al. 35 although the number of cells per well and the amplification procedure is different. After the RT-LAMP reaction, the positive wells at each dilution were scored, and the maximum likelihood method was used to determine the frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA using the IUPMStats v1.0 online software66.
Additional SQuHIVLa validation experiments were performed using primary CD4+ T cells from people living with HIV (PLWH). Isolated CD4+ T cells were resuspended in culture RPMI-1640 media supplemented with 10% FBS and 100 μg/ml penicillin-streptomycin and rested for 5 h at 37 °C in a humidified, 5% CO2 incubator. CD4+ T cells were then stimulated with 100 ng/mL of PMA and 1 µg/mL of ionomycin (both from Sigma) for 12 h as described previously35. Activated CD4+ T cells were washed, counted, serially diluted in PBS, and distributed to a 96-well PCR plate containing 15 µL RT-LAMP master mix (Supplementary Table 4) following the same procedure mentioned above. RT-LAMP was carried out following a thermal program; incubation at 45 °C for 60 min followed by continuous 65 °C with fluorescence read every 30 s for 180 cycles, which corresponds to 90 min of amplification time (unless mentioned otherwise). After the RT-LAMP reaction, the frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA was quantified using IUPMStats v1.0 online software66 as mentioned above.
When a limited number of PBMCs were available, activated CD4+ T cells were serially diluted to 2 × 106 cells/ml, 1 × 106 cells/ml, 2.5 × 105 cells/ml, and 6.3 × 104 cells/ml in PBS and, 5 µL of the cell suspension was distributed to 22–24 wells of a 96-well plate corresponding to 10,000, 5000, 1250, and 313 cells per well.
tat/rev Induced Limiting Dilution Assay (TILDA)
CD4+ T cells obtained from PLWH were stimulated for 12 h with PMA and ionomycin and serially diluted in a limiting fashion as mentioned previously35. Semi-nested PCR was performed using the reaction mix and thermal protocols reported by Procopio et al. 35 and Lungu et al. 65. TILDA Primers were reported in a previous study35.
Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA)
Intact proviral DNA levels in CD4+ T cells were evaluated using lysed extracts, with nucleic acid isolation from at least 2 × 106 CD4+ T cells via the PCI extraction method. Duplex digital PCR (dPCR) on an Absolute Q digital PCR platform (Thermo Fisher) targeted the packaging signal (Ψ) and Envelope gene (Env) following an adapted IPDA potocol18,67,68. Briefly, the PCR reaction mix includes 1.8 μL Absolute Q DNA Digital PCR Master Mix 5X (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1 μL of the packaging signal (Ψ) target FAM-probe (10×), 1 μL of the Env target HEX-probe (10×), and 700 ng of genomic DNA (gDNA). This mixture was diluted in nuclease-free H2O to achieve a final reaction volume of 9 μL. The frequency of CD4+ T cells was determined by measuring the cellular gene ribonuclease P/MRP subunit p30 (RPP30) in a duplicate well. The duplex RPP30 dPCR was arranged in a similar manner, employing RPP30 primer and probe sets with a 7 ng genomic DNA (gDNA) input18.
Quantification of total HIV-1 DNA measured by ddPCR
Total HIV-1 DNA was measured by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) (Bio-Rad) as previously described69. Genomic DNA was isolated from CD4+ T cells using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kits (QIAGEN). Quantification of the RPP30 gene was used to determine host cell concentration. Amplification was performed with primers and probes covering HIV-1 5′ LTR-gag HXB2 coordinates 684–81069. Thermocycling conditions for ddPCR were: 95 °C for 10 min, 45 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s and 60 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min. Thereafter droplets from each sample were analyzed on the Bio-Rad QX200 Droplet Reader and data were analyzed using QuantaSoft software (Bio-Rad).
Statistics and reproducibility
All graphs were generated and statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California USA, www.graphpad.com). In order to calculate the lowest amount of tat/rev msRNA in a sample that can be consistently detected with 95% probability (LOD-95%), probit analysis was used. The Probit was calculated by the Excel function [5 + NORMSINV(P)], where P was the HIT rate (proportion of positive reactions) and 6.64 probit value (1.64 for 95% limit, +5 for probit scale) was used to extrapolate LOD-95% RNA copies. The effect of background cells on RT-LAMP amplification time was determined using Ordinary One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. The coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated to determine the reproducibility of SQuHIVLa. Accuracy percentage (AP) was calculated using the ABS function in Excel. Normality of the HIV-1 reservoir sizes measured by SQuHIVLa, TILDA, IPDA, and total HIV-1 DNA was tested with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Correlations were performed using the Pearson test when data passed the normality test, otherwise, Spearman’s rank correlation test was used. Band-Altman calculations were performed to test the agreement between reservoir size measured by SQuHIVLa and TILDA. Inducible HIV-1 subtype C reservoir size quantified from PLWH, grouped based on biological sex, were compared utilizing a two-tailed unpaired t-test. Experiments that used J-Lats 11.1 cells were performed at least three times, or as indicated in the figure legends. For experiments using primary CD4+ T cells obtained from human donors, sample sizes were indicated in the figure legends. The sample size was determined based on the minimum requirement to perform statistical tests and the availability of materials. All the experimental schematics were generated using BioRender.com.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Results
A LAMP primer/probe set designed for exclusive detection of HIV-1 tat/rev msRNA
The successful design of a LAMP primer/probe set for specific LAMP detection of HIV-1 tat/rev msRNA, depended on a set of guidelines as depicted in Fig. 1. The most critical criterion to ensure precise detection of tat/rev msRNA, excluding intron-containing tat/rev HIV-1 genomic DNA, was that the primer binding sites are exon-spanning. Using HIV-1 subtype B as a reference, we designed primer/probe sets as depicted in the flowchart (Fig. 1). We retrieved (Fig. 1 step a) and aligned (Fig. 1 step b) ten complete genome sequences of HIV-1 subtype B from different years (1983–2005) and various geographical locations to generate an in silico-spliced tat/revv HIV-1 DNA consensus sequence (Fig. 1 step c). Using the PrimerExplorer V5 software and the consensus tat/rev HIV-1 DNA FASTA file, we generated a list of preliminary sets of LAMP primers (Fig. 1 steps d and e) from which we selected primer sets where either the F2 binding region was within nucleotide position 125–240 or the B2 binding region was within nucleotide position 190–305, to ensure that the splice site (215th nucleotide) was located within the forward loop (5′F2 to 3′F1) or backward loop (5′B2 to 3′B1) (Fig. 1 step f). This criterion ensures that unstable loop formation resulting from primer binding to intron-containing tat/rev DNA, would inhibit isothermal amplification, thereby resulting in the exclusive detection of tat/rev msRNA (Fig. 2a). Additionally, we generated a set of loop primers using the PrimerExplorer V5 software (Fig. 1, step g) and selected the loop primer pair where at least one of them is suitable for the conversion into a self-quenching probe (Fig. 1 step h, Methods). Specific details are provided in the Supplementary Note 1. The selected set of LAMP and loop primers were aligned to the ten HIV-1 genome sequences to assess primer-target sequence complementarity (Fig. 1 step i and Fig. 2b). Given HIV-1’s high genetic diversity, it is impossible to ensure that the primer binding regions in patient-specific viral RNA are devoid of mutation hotspots. However, we strived to ensure that the mutation hotspots are located at positions such as the 5′ ends of F3, B3, F2, B2, and 3′ ends of F1c, B1c primer binding regions (Fig. 1 step j and Fig. 2b). A set of primers with mismatches at these positions, whilst still meeting all the LAMP primer criteria such as melting temperature and distance between primer binding sites, would have the least impact on amplification (Fig. 1 step k and “Methods” section) hence selected as the final primer set. The loop forward primer (LF) was converted into a self-quenching probe by adding an internal FAM fluorophore to enable sequence-specific, real-time detection and quantification of LAMP amplicons (“Methods” section, Supplementary Note 1). Additionally, a variety of experimental validation approaches, performed in this work, were applied to the final primer set before it was selected for use in SQuHIVLa (Fig. 1 step l). The designed primers and probe sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 2.
Highly sensitive and specific detection of tat/rev msRNA by RT-LAMP
To assess the sensitivity of RT-LAMP in detecting tat/revv msRNA, we used serial dilutions of msRNA, in vitro transcribed from an intron-free tat/rev DNA template, driven by a T7 promoter (Fig. 3a). As few as 50 copies of RNA were detected within 30.46 min (±7.21 min) using RT-LAMP in >97% of all reactions, with a Limit of Detection-95% at 31 copies (Fig. 3b, d, e). At lower RNA copy numbers, RT-LAMP exhibited reduced efficiency, resulting in a longer time to results and increased variability between reactions, though all positive amplifications were achieved within 90 min (Fig. 3c). In experiments to assess the specificity of Bst 2.0 polymerase enzyme for tat/rev msRNA, we performed LAMP reactions with the required Bst 2.0 polymerase enzyme in the absence of the reverse transcriptase enzyme, RTx (Methods). Minimal and inconsistent amplification was observed at high copies of RNA (≥250 copies), suggesting some basal reverse transcriptase activity of the Bst 2.0 polymerase, which manufacturer validation experiments have also shown. However, the RT enzyme is necessary for robust and consistent amplification of RNA templates (Supplementary Fig. 1A, B).
Subsequently, to determine the sensitivity of RT-LAMP in detecting tat/rev msRNA directly from cells, we used J-Lat 11.1 cells, a Jurkat cell line harboring a latent but inducible full-length HIV-1 genome that expresses green fluorescence protein (GFP), as a product of msRNA transcripts (Supplementary Fig. 1C), upon activation. We sorted single GFP+ cells (Supplementary Fig. 1D) into RT-LAMP reaction plates in the presence or absence of PMA-stimulated uninfected donor CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3f). In the absence of CD4+ T cell background, a single GFP+ cell was detected in 95.83% of all RT-LAMP reactions (Fig. 3g), decreasing to 83.33% positivity in a background of 2 × 104 cells, however, the presence of cell background did not significantly impact the amplification time of RT-LAMP (mean amplification time ranging from 31.26 min for no cell background to 42.63 min in a background of 8 × 104 cells) (Fig. 3h, i).
Importantly, in an additional series of validation experiments, we made a crucial observation demonstrating the selective amplification of tat/rev msRNA and the exclusion of intron-containing tat/rev genomic DNA when employing RT-LAMP (Fig. 4a, b). This specificity was in stark contrast to the results obtained using semi-nested PCR with non-exon-spanning primers/probe, which detected both the msRNA and genomic DNA, as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 2. Minimal to no amplification was observed when RT-LAMP reactions were performed without the reverse transcriptase enzyme (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3A) as well as in a range of validation samples including; GFP− J-Lat 11.1 cells that do not express msRNA (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 3B); DNase-treated J-Lat 11.1 RNA and RNase-treated J-Lat 11.1 DNA or using HIV-1 plasmid as template (Fig. 4b). Overall, we demonstrate the rapid, sensitive and specific detection of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA by RT-LAMP and sought to use this assay for quantifying the inducible HIV-1 reservoir, hereafter referred to as SQuHIVLa (Specific Quantification of Inducible HIV-1 reservoir by RT-LAMP).
Accurate and reproducible quantification of the frequency of tat/rev msRNA-expressing cells using SQuHIVLa
In the next set of experiments, we sought to assess the reproducibility of SQuHIVLa in quantifying the frequency of tat/rev msRNA-expressing cells, a surrogate measure for the inducible viral reservoir. To model HIV-1 reservoir samples, we generated a panel of four test samples comprising activated GFP+ J-Lat 11.1 cells (0.1, 1, 10 and 20 cells) sorted into a suspension of one million CD4+ T cells. Cells from each test sample were then distributed into RT-LAMP reaction plates in a limiting dilution format, which allows quantification by maximum likelihood statistics (Fig.4c, “Methods” section). The observed and predicted viral reservoir size measurement were highly precise at frequencies greater than 20 GFP+ cells/million CD4+ T cells with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 6.61%. The CV increased to 60.61% at 0.1 cell GFP+ cells/million CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4d). Furthermore, the observed and predicted viral reservoir measurements correlated significantly having a good accuracy with mean accuracy percentage (AP) of 85% for reservoir size greater than 1 GFP+ cell/million CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4e).
To further validate SQuHIVLa, we applied the assay to quantify the frequency of msRNA+ cells as a surrogate measure for an inducible viral reservoir in primary CD4+ T cells obtained from people with HIV-1 subtype B (PLWHB) on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Following 12-h PMA/ionomycin stimulation, which enhances transcriptional activation of inducible proviruses, whole CD4+ T cells were distributed in a limiting dilution format and tat/rev msRNA transcripts were amplified using RT-LAMP (Fig. 4f). The frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA was then determined by maximum likelihood estimation. We observed suboptimal tat/rev msRNA amplification in primary CD4+ T cells, and this was addressed by optimizing the sample incubation time at 45 °C before isothermal amplification at 65 °C. This adjustment facilitated more efficient RNA release. Importantly, the viral reservoir size did not exhibit an increase in three independent donors with incubation times exceeding one hour at 45 °C (Fig. 4g). This optimization step was subsequently incorporated into the SQuHIVLa protocol, along with 90 min of isothermal amplification, as all positive signals were consistently detected within the initial 90 min of amplification (Supplementary Fig. 4). The mean inter-assay CV, 9.58% (Range: 7.2%–12.23%) was determined from three independent SQuHIVLa experiments using CD4+ T cells from three PLWHB demonstrating high reproducibility of SQuHIVLa in quantifying the inducible HIV-1 reservoir (Fig. 4h).
Correlation of reservoir size measured by SQuHIVLA with several assays
In this section, we compared the quantification of the inducible msRNA+ reservoir size using SQuHIVLa and TILDA, a well-established assay for assessing the frequency of msRNA+ cells. Specifically, we measured the inducible tat/rev msRNA+ reservoir size for 4 PLWHB using both SQuHIVLa and the TILDA protocol reported by Procopio et al. (TILDA_Procopio)35 and for 9 PLWHB by SQuHIVLa and the TILDA protocol reported by Lungu et al. (TILDA_Lungu)65. These two TILDA versions have been previously documented for their excellent reproducibility, demonstrating low inter-laboratory variability65. The correlation between SQuHIVLa and TILDA_Lungu (r = 0.62, P = 0.0857, Fig. 5c) was stronger than with TILDA_Procopio (r = 0.2, p = 0.9167, Fig. 5a) as indicated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r), though statistical significance was not achieved for either comparison, possibly due to the limited sample size (n = 4) in the SQuHIVLa vs TILDA_Procopio and (n = 9) SQuHIVLa vs TILDA_Lungu analyses. However, Band-Altman plots demonstrated strong agreement of SQuHIVLa values with both TILDA_Procopio (mean bias = 0.058, 95% limits of agreement (LOA) = −0.48 to 0.59, Fig. 5b) and TILDA_Lungu (mean bias = 0.051, 95% LOA = −0.31 to 0.41, Fig. 5d). Values measured by SQuHIVLa and TILDA_Lungu (n = 9) also exhibited moderate correlation, with a Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (LCCC) of 0.62 and coefficient of bias (Cb) of 0.9714. Lin’s concordance correlation was not calculated for the comparison between SQuHIVLa and TILDA_Procopio due to the limited sample size (n = 4).
Furthermore, we explored the correlation between values obtained from primary CD4+ T cells of 12 PLWHB using SQuHIVLa and their corresponding total HIV-1 DNA copies and intact HIV-1 DNA copies per million CD4+ T cells measured by IPDA. The values of SQuHIVLa showed a significant positive correlation with intact HIV-1 DNA copies (r = 0.58, p = 0.049), but not with total HIV-1 DNA copies (r = 0.21, p = 0.5199) (Fig. 5f, g).
Adaptation of SQuHIVLa for non-B HIV-1 Subtypes
To determine the feasibility of using one primer-probe set for different HIV-1 subtypes, we aligned the subtype B tat/rev msRNA LAMP primer-probe sequences to genome sequences of HIV-1 subtypes C and A. A heatmap of the mismatch score, corresponding to the relative quantity of matching nucleotides for each primer binding region, revealed poor compatibility of the subtype B LAMP primer-probe sets for detection of subtypes C and A tat/rev msRNA (Supplementary Fig. 5). Several mismatches were present at sites critical for the LAMP reaction. Therefore, to specifically detect tat/rev msRNA from people with HIV-1 subtype C, globally the most prevalent subtype, we designed a new set of LAMP primers and probes (Fig. 6a) following the aforementioned guidelines (Fig. 1, “Methods” section and Supplementary Note 1) and fulfilling the requirements to ensure specific amplification of subtype C tat/rev msRNA. The new primer-probe set demonstrated similar sensitivity in detecting in vitro HIV-1 C tat/rev msRNA transcripts compared to the HIV-1 subtype B primer/probe set. In all experiments performed, 50 copies of tat/rev HIV-1 subtype C msRNA were detected in >97% reactions (Fig. 6b) with a mean amplification time of 38.19 min (±7.47 min) (Fig. 6c). All positive amplifications were achieved within 90 min (Fig. 6c) and the LOD-95% was determined to be 45 copies (Fig. 6d, e), consistent with the observations for Subtype B tat/rev msRNA. To assess the cross-reactivity of the primers/probe, inducible reservoirs were quantified in three individuals with HIV-1 subtype B (PLWHB) and three with subtype C (PLWHC). This analysis involved the use of both subtype-specific (subtype B and subtype C-specific primers/probe for PLWHB and PLWHC, respectively) and non-specific (subtype C and subtype B-specific primers/probe for PLWHB and PLWHC, respectively) LAMP primers/probe sets. Suboptimal reservoir quantification was observed when subtype non-specific primers/probe were utilized (Fig. 6f), highlighting the importance of designing subtype-specific primers/probe sets for optimal reservoir quantitation.
We then assessed the performance of SQuHIVLa across a panel of clinical samples from 19 PLWHC on fully suppressive ART (17 chronically infected and 2 elite controllers). tat/rev msRNA was detectable in all samples and the frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA ranged from 10.12 to 98.08 cells per million CD4+ T cells (median = 48.47, IQR 32.32 −68.40) (Fig. 6g). Furthermore, we explored the correlation between values obtained from primary CD4+ T cells of 12 PLWHC using SQuHIVLa and their corresponding total HIV-1 DNA copies measured by digital droplet PCR. SQuHIVLa values did not show a statistically significant positive correlation with total HIV-1 DNA copies (Pearson r = 0.2083, P-value = 0.5160). Interestingly, in the chronically infected PLWHC, the frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA was notably higher in females (n = 10) than in males (n = 7) (P = 0.0202) (Fig. 6i). Univariate correlation analyses did not reveal significant association between the frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA and CD4+ T cell counts or pre-ART plasma HIV-1 RNA or duration of infection before ART initiation (Supplementary Fig. 6) Overall, these findings demonstrate that SQuHIVLa is highly adaptable and has great potential for application in studies involving people with HIV-1, with various clinical characteristics.
Discussion
Previous and emerging studies have reported that tat/rev msRNA levels correlate with plasma HIV-1 RNA42 and that expression of cell-associated msRNA correlates with and may be a potential biomarker predictive of cellular viral rebound upon ART interruption70,71,72. A strong correlation between supernatant HIV-1 RNA and msRNA upon ex vivo latency reversal suggested msRNA may be a useful biomarker of virion production43, with the caveat that in ex vivo interventional models, prolonged pharmacological stimulation of cells could induce a non-physiological state, cell death, or amplification of RNA signals unrelated to replication competence. Nevertheless, the detection of tat/rev msRNA transcripts diminishes the probability of measuring defective proviruses with large internal deletions, as the msRNA transcripts are produced through the splicing of full-length viral transcripts13. tat/rev msRNA thus holds potential as a relevant indicator for the inducible viral reservoir.
Current methods for tat/rev msRNA quantification involve real-time RT-qPCR or RT-ddPCR on bulk total cellular RNA, both highly sensitive and specific for the targeted viral RNA transcripts36,39. Certain RNA induction assays directly probe tat/rev msRNA in whole cells without RNA extraction, simplifying the workflow to perform semi-nested RT-qPCR35,46. However, employing the direct whole cell input without DNase digestion, followed by semi-nested RT-qPCR, as done in previously developed assays like TILDA35,65,73,74,75, presents limitations that may impact assay accuracy. Notably, this method increases the risk of detecting tat/rev within genomic HIV DNA due to the lack of usage of primers and probes that span exon junctions to exclusively amplify tat/rev msRNA, potentially causing false positives and overestimating measurements of the inducible viral reservoir. Moreover, semi-nested RT-qPCR approaches such as TILDA, performed in limiting dilution, have low throughput and considerably increase cross-contamination risks while transferring the pre-amplified PCR products in a new plate for final amplification, the latter leading to false measurements74. We developed SQuHIVLA, a specific and sensitive RT-LAMP assay, to overcome the limitations of tat/rev msRNA RT-qPCR. This rapid and highly accurate method offers a novel application of LAMP technology for quantifying tat/rev msRNA+ HIV-1 viral reservoir.
The swift and highly sensitive detection of tat/rev msRNA, surpassing existing semi-nested RT-qPCR methods, represents a groundbreaking advancement. Leveraging the rapid amplification, high sensitivity, and specificity of RT-LAMP in a single reaction, we improved the detection and quantification of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA upon activation (SQuHIVLa). As a proof of concept, we demonstrated an RT-LAMP-based assessment of the inducible viral reservoir in CD4+ T cells from individuals with HIV-1 subtypes B and C under suppressive ART. The quantitative nature of the SQuHIVLa, i.e. the number of cells expressing HIV-1 msRNA per million CD4+ T cells, is accomplished through (1) the specific and sensitive detection of HIV-1 msRNA by RT-LAMP followed by (2) maximum likelihood calculations based on the distribution of cells in limiting dilution format. Despite the limited data, our results show promising sensitivity, specificity, and low inter-assay variability. The test exhibited high sensitivity, quantifying the inducible reservoir with as few as 10 cells per million CD4+ T cells, underscoring its effectiveness. Further evaluation with cells from individuals with low or ultra-low viral reservoir sizes is recommended.
In designing LAMP primers exclusively for tat/rev msRNA detection, it was crucial to ensure they were exon-spanning. The tat/rev intron, approximately 2 kb, if included in the loops during amplification, would destabilize the loops, hindering further target amplification as depicted in Fig. 2a. This instability would render the fluorescent self-quenching loop primer63, a reporter for specific target amplification, non-functional. We have developed a comprehensive set of guidelines for designing tat/rev exon-spanning LAMP primers, meeting target-specific criteria along with standard LAMP primer requirements (Supplementary Note 1). Designing LAMP PCR primers and a probe to bind within the tat/rev genomic region is extremely challenging due to high HIV-1 genetic diversity and the need to identify eight relatively conserved primer binding regions for the LAMP reaction. Additionally, our data demonstrated less efficient amplification of tat/rev msRNA when subtype B-specific primers/probe were employed for PLWHC and vice versa, leading to suboptimal quantification of the inducible reservoir (Fig. 6f). Because of this, a universal LAMP primer/probe set for the broad detection of tat/rev msRNA expressed from multiple HIV-1 subtypes is quite likely not feasible. Multiplexing LAMP primer/probe sets for different HIV-1 subtypes into one reaction is potentially challenging to achieve76 without complex molecular design77,78 and extensive optimizations.
SQuHIVLa demonstrates a significant positive correlation with intact HIV-1 DNA copies but not with total HIV-1 DNA copies. This observation may be attributed to a substantial proportion of the total HIV-1 DNA copies comprising defective proviruses, which may not contribute to the inducible reservoir expressing HIV-1 msRNA. SQuHIVLa exhibited a moderate Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (r) with the reservoir size measured by TILDA, although this correlation was not statistically significant. The absence of a robust correlation and statistical significance may, in part, be attributed to the limited sample size. Furthermore, the disparity in amplification methods, along with differences in sensitivity and specificity for the target, as well as the potential for false positive signals from proviral DNA contamination in TILDA, could contribute to these findings.
Interestingly, in our cohort of PLWHC during chronic infection, women exhibited a significantly higher mean frequency of cells expressing tat/rev msRNA after PMA/Ionomycin treatment compared to men. Despite limited research, existing studies on HIV-1 reservoir size, primarily assessed through DNA quantification, report comparable levels in men and women79,80,81. Our findings contradict studies focusing on viral transcription and replication (viral outgrowth) that reported a smaller inducible viral reservoir in women82. This disparity may rise from differences in endpoints, such as us- versus msRNA transcripts, reflecting varied capacities for viral inducibility. Furthermore, viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) often underestimates reservoirs due to suboptimal provirus induction83. It is likely that the frequency of inducible virus is truly small in women, or poorly inducible. Potential sex-specific differences in inducible reservoir size may be influenced by estrogen, known to repress HIV-1 transcription in latency models84, in vitro infection systems85, and primary cells84. Further research with a larger sample size and mechanistic studies are crucial for comprehending sex-specific implications in reservoir maintenance and dynamics.
Amid the rise of explorative strategies to clear the inducible viral reservoir in PLWH, reliable, sensitive, and scalable assays are essential to determine the efficacy of putative intervention strategies. Moreover, future studies should focus on evaluating large cohorts in Sub-Saharan Africa86, which bears a disproportionate burden of HIV-12. This emphasizes the necessity for viral reservoir quantification assays applicable in resource-constrained settings87. RT-LAMP is expected to contribute to this goal as it is highly sensitive, capable of detecting low copy numbers of RNA targets, and can provide quantitative results through real-time monitoring. Furthermore, it is less expensive, more user-friendly, and compatible with a variety of sample types. These features make RT-LAMP a promising tool for quantitative analysis in various fields, including HIV-1 molecular diagnostics and viral load monitoring, especially in limited resource settings. However, despite all the advantages, the RT-LAMP approach combined with maximum likelihood calculations also presents a few limitations in quantifying the frequency of msRNA-expressing cells: Firstly, the complexity of LAMP is heightened, particularly in primer design, when aiming to position the exon/exon junction inside the loop for specific msRNA amplification, especially for sequences such as tat/rev msRNA, which has a high polymorphic content. Likewise, the maximum likelihood calculation for determining the frequency of inducible HIV-1 reservoirs faces challenges in precisely estimating the true reservoir size due to potential model assumptions and uncertainties in defining latent reservoir parameters. Opting for a single-cell approach like flow cytometry to identify msRNA-positive cells, instead of relying on maximum likelihood statistics, offers a potential solution to challenges associated with the limiting dilution step. Nonetheless, achieving this requires substantial optimization efforts. Therefore, advancing research and fostering collaborations, particularly with biomedical industries, is essential to develop certified high-throughput assays for HIV-1 and other pathogens based on the principles of SQuHIVLa.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Information. All source data used in the manuscript is provided in the Supplementary Data 1 file. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.
References
Kharsany, A. B. & Karim, Q. A. HIV infection and AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: current status, challenges and opportunities. Open AIDS J. 10, 34–48 (2016).
UNAIDS GLOBAL AIDS UPDATE (2023)
Chun, T. W. et al. Quantification of latent tissue reservoirs and total body viral load in HIV-1 infection. Nature 387, 183–188 (1997).
Chun, T. W. et al. Presence of an inducible HIV-1 latent reservoir during highly active antiretroviral therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13193–13197 (1997).
Joos, B. et al. HIV rebounds from latently infected cells, rather than from continuing low-level replication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16725–16730 (2008).
Landovitz, R. J., Scott, H. & Deeks, S. G. Prevention, treatment and cure of HIV infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-023-00914-1 (2023).
Stoszko, M., Ne, E., Abner, E. & Mahmoudi, T. A broad drug arsenal to attack a strenuous latent HIV reservoir. Curr. Opin. Virol. 38, 37–53 (2019).
Stone, M. et al. Assessing the suitability of next-generation viral outgrowth assays to measure human immunodeficiency virus 1 latent reservoir size. J. Infect. Dis. 224, 1209–1218 (2021).
Hodel, F., Patxot, M., Snäkä, T. & Ciuffi, A. HIV-1 latent reservoir: size matters. Future Virol. 11, 785–794 (2016).
Siliciano, J. D. & Siliciano, R. F. Assays to measure latency, reservoirs, and reactivation. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 417, 23–41 (2018).
Wang, Z., Simonetti, F. R., Siliciano, R. F. & Laird, G. M. Measuring replication competent HIV-1: advances and challenges in defining the latent reservoir. Retrovirology 15, 21 (2018).
Cicilionytė, A., Berkhout, B. & Pasternak, A. O. Assessing proviral competence: current approaches to evaluate HIV-1 persistence. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 16, 223–231 (2021).
Ho, Y. C. et al. Replication-competent noninduced proviruses in the latent reservoir increase barrier to HIV-1 cure. Cell 155, 540–551 (2013).
Enick, P. N. et al. Comparison of methods to quantify inducible HIV-1 outgrowth. J. Virus Erad. 7, 100043 (2021).
Eriksson, S. et al. Comparative analysis of measures of viral reservoirs in HIV-1 eradication studies. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003174 (2013).
Alidjinou, E. K., Bocket, L. & Hober, D. Quantification of viral DNA during HIV-1 infection: a review of relevant clinical uses and laboratory methods. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 63, 53–59 (2015).
Bruner, K. M. et al. Defective proviruses rapidly accumulate during acute HIV-1 infection. Nat. Med. 22, 1043–1049 (2016).
Bruner, K. M. et al. A quantitative approach for measuring the reservoir of latent HIV-1 proviruses. Nature 566, 120–125 (2019).
Falcinelli, S. D., Ceriani, C., Margolis, D. M. & Archin, N. M. New frontiers in measuring and characterizing the HIV reservoir. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02878 (2019).
Levy, C. N. et al. A highly multiplexed droplet digital PCR assay to measure the intact HIV-1 proviral reservoir. Cell Rep. Med. 2, 100243 (2021).
Cassidy, N. A. J. et al. HIV reservoir quantification using cross-subtype multiplex ddPCR. iScience 25, 103615 (2022).
Gaebler, C. et al. Combination of quadruplex qPCR and next-generation sequencing for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the HIV-1 latent reservoir. J. Exp. Med. 216, 2253–2264 (2019).
Gaebler, C. et al. Sequence evaluation and comparative analysis of novel assays for intact proviral HIV-1 DNA. J. Virol. 95, e01986-20 (2021).
Kinloch, N. N. et al. HIV-1 diversity considerations in the application of the Intact Proviral DNA Assay (IPDA). Nat. Commun. 12, 165 (2021).
White, J. A. et al. Measuring the latent reservoir for HIV-1: quantification bias in near full-length genome sequencing methods. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010845 (2022).
Anderson, E. M. & Maldarelli, F. The role of integration and clonal expansion in HIV infection: live long and prosper. Retrovirology 15, 71 (2018).
Einkauf, K. B. et al. Intact HIV-1 proviruses accumulate at distinct chromosomal positions during prolonged antiretroviral therapy. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 988–998 (2019).
Huang, A. S. et al. Integration features of intact latent HIV-1 in CD4+ T cell clones contribute to viral persistence. J. Exp. Med. 218, e20211427 (2021).
Kuniholm, J. et al. Intragenic proviral elements support transcription of defective HIV-1 proviruses. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009982 (2021).
Collora, J. A. & Ho, Y. C. Integration site-dependent HIV-1 promoter activity shapes host chromatin conformation. Genome Res. 33, 891–906 (2023).
Vansant, G. et al. The chromatin landscape at the HIV-1 provirus integration site determines viral expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 7801–7817 (2020).
Janssens, J., De Wit, F., Parveen, N. & Debyser, Z. Single-cell imaging shows that the transcriptional state of the HIV-1 provirus and its reactivation potential depend on the integration site. mBio 13, e0000722 (2022).
Cillo, A. R. et al. Quantification of HIV-1 latency reversal in resting CD4+ T cells from patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7078–7083 (2014).
Massanella, M. et al. Improved assays to measure and characterize the inducible HIV reservoir. EBioMedicine 36, 113–121 (2018).
Procopio, F. A. et al. A novel assay to measure the magnitude of the inducible viral reservoir in HIV-infected individuals. EBioMedicine 2, 874–883 (2015).
Yucha, R. W. et al. High-throughput characterization of HIV-1 reservoir reactivation using a single-cell-in-droplet PCR assay. EBioMedicine 20, 217–229 (2017).
Plantin, J., Massanella, M. & Chomont, N. Inducible HIV RNA transcription assays to measure HIV persistence: pros and cons of a compromise. Retrovirology 15, 9 (2018).
Bullen, C. K., Laird, G. M., Durand, C. M., Siliciano, J. D. & Siliciano, R. F. New ex vivo approaches distinguish effective and ineffective single agents for reversing HIV-1 latency in vivo. Nat. Med. 20, 425–429 (2014).
Pasternak, A. O. et al. Highly sensitive methods based on seminested real-time reverse transcription-PCR for quantitation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 unspliced and multiply spliced RNA and proviral DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 2206–2211 (2008).
Shan, L. et al. A novel PCR assay for quantification of HIV-1 RNA. J. Virol. 87, 6521–6525 (2013).
Kaiser, P. et al. Assays for precise quantification of total (including short) and elongated HIV-1 transcripts. J. Virol. Methods 242, 1–8 (2017).
Lewin, S. R. et al. Use of real-time PCR and molecular beacons to detect virus replication in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals on prolonged effective antiretroviral therapy. J. Virol. 73, 6099–6103 (1999).
Zerbato, J. M. et al. Multiply spliced HIV RNA is a predictive measure of virus production ex vivo and in vivo following reversal of HIV latency. EBioMedicine 65, 103241 (2021).
Pasternak, A. O. et al. Cellular levels of HIV unspliced RNA from patients on combination antiretroviral therapy with undetectable plasma viremia predict the therapy outcome. PLoS ONE 4, e8490 (2009).
Schmid, A. et al. Profound depletion of HIV-1 transcription in patients initiating antiretroviral therapy during acute infection. PLoS ONE 5, e13310 (2010).
Lungu, C. & Procopio, F. A. TILDA: Tat/Rev induced limiting dilution assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 2407, 365–372 (2022).
Baxter, A. E. et al. Multiparametric characterization of rare HIV-infected cells using an RNA-flow FISH technique. Nat. Protoc. 12, 2029–2049 (2017).
Baxter, A. E., Niessl, J., Morou, A. & Kaufmann, D. E. RNA flow cytometric FISH for investigations into HIV immunology, vaccination and cure strategies. AIDS Res. Ther. 14, 40 (2017).
Sannier, G. et al. Combined single-cell transcriptional, translational, and genomic profiling reveals HIV-1 reservoir diversity. Cell Rep. 36, 109643 (2021).
Abdel-Mohsen, M. et al. Recommendations for measuring HIV reservoir size in cure-directed clinical trials. Nat. Med. 26, 1339–1350 (2020).
Rossouw, T., Tucker, J. D., van Zyl, G. U., Sikwesi, K. & Godfrey, C. Barriers to HIV remission research in low- and middle-income countries. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 20, 21521 (2017).
Mori, Y. & Notomi, T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J. Infect. Chemother. 15, 62–69 (2009).
Dao Thi, V. L. et al. A colorimetric RT-LAMP assay and LAMP-sequencing for detecting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eabc7075 (2020).
Yan, C. et al. Rapid and visual detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by a reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 26, 773–779 (2020).
Huang, W. E. et al. RT-LAMP for rapid diagnosis of coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Micro. Biotechnol. 13, 950–961 (2020).
Joung, J. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with SHERLOCK One-Pot Testing. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1492–1494 (2020).
Amoah, I. D. et al. RT-LAMP: a cheaper, simpler and faster alternative for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. Food Environ. Virol. 13, 447–456 (2021).
Rudolph, D. L., Sullivan, V., Owen, S. M. & Curtis, K. A. Detection of Acute HIV-1 Infection by RT-LAMP. PLoS ONE 10, e0126609 (2015).
Curtis, K. A. et al. A multiplexed RT-LAMP assay for detection of group M HIV-1 in plasma or whole blood. J. Virol. Methods 255, 91–97 (2018).
Li, Y. et al. A rapid variant-tolerant reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the point of care detection of HIV-1. Analyst 146, 5347–5356 (2021).
HIV Sequence Database (accessed 9 June 2021) https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/
Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027 (2021).
Gadkar, V. J., Goldfarb, D. M., Gantt, S. & Tilley, P. A. G. Real-time detection and monitoring of loop mediated amplification (LAMP) reaction using self-quenching and de-quenching fluorogenic probes. Sci. Rep. 8, 5548 (2018).
Jordan, A., Bisgrove, D. & Verdin, E. HIV reproducibly establishes a latent infection after acute infection of T cells in vitro. EMBO J. 22, 1868–1877 (2003).
Lungu, C. et al. Inter-laboratory reproducibility of inducible HIV-1 reservoir quantification by TILDA. Viruses 12, 973 (2020).
Rosenbloom, D. I. S. et al. Designing and interpreting limiting dilution assays: general principles and applications to the latent reservoir for human immunodeficiency virus-1. Open Forum Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofv123 (2015).
Sarabia, I., Huang, S.-H., Ward, A. R., Jones, R. B. & Bosque, A. The intact noninducible latent HIV-1 reservoir is established in an in vitro primary TCM cell model of latency. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.01297-01220 (2021).
van Snippenberg, W. et al. Triplex digital PCR assays for the quantification of intact proviral HIV-1 DNA. Methods 201, 41–48 (2022).
Lee, G. Q. et al. HIV−1 DNA sequence diversity and evolution during acute subtype C infection. Nat. Commun. 10, 2737 (2019).
Fischer, M. et al. Cellular viral rebound after cessation of potent antiretroviral therapy predicted by levels of multiply spliced HIV-1 RNA encoding nef. J. Infect. Dis. 190, 1979–1988 (2004).
De Scheerder, M. A. et al. Evaluating predictive markers for viral rebound and safety assessment in blood and lumbar fluid during HIV-1 treatment interruption. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 1311–1320 (2020).
Cynthia, L. et al. Analytical treatment interruption: detection of an increase in the latent, inducible HIV-1 reservoir more than a decade after viral suppression. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.14.23298452 (2023).
Bertoldi, A. et al. Development of C-TILDA: a modified TILDA method for reservoir quantification in long term treated patients infected with subtype C HIV-1. J. Virol. Methods 276, 113778 (2020).
Lungu, C., Banga, R., Gruters, R. A. & Procopio, F. A. Inducible HIV-1 reservoir quantification: clinical relevance, applications and advancements of TILDA. Front. Microbiol. 12, 686690 (2021).
Prins, H. A. B. et al. The BAF complex inhibitor pyrimethamine reverses HIV-1 latency in people with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy. Sci. Adv. 9, eade6675 (2023).
Kim, J. et al. Development and evaluation of a multiplex loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay for differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and non-tuberculosis mycobacterium in clinical samples. PLoS ONE 16, e0244753 (2021).
Sherrill-Mix, S. et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using RT-LAMP and molecular beacons. Genome Biol. 22, 169 (2021).
Tanner, N. A., Zhang, Y. & Evans, T. C. Jr. Simultaneous multiple target detection in real-time loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Biotechniques 53, 81–89 (2012).
Gandhi, R. T. et al. Levels of HIV-1 persistence on antiretroviral therapy are not associated with markers of inflammation or activation. PLOS Pathog. 13, e1006285 (2017).
Scully, E. P. et al. Sex-based differences in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reservoir activity and residual immune activation. J. Infect. Dis. 219, 1084–1094 (2018).
Falcinelli, S. D. et al. Impact of biological sex on immune activation and frequency of the latent HIV reservoir during suppressive antiretroviral therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 222, 1843–1852 (2020).
Prodger, J. L. et al. Reduced HIV-1 latent reservoir outgrowth and distinct immune correlates among women in Rakai, Uganda. JCI Insight 5, e139287 (2020).
Siliciano, J. D. & Siliciano, R. F. Low inducibility of latent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proviruses as a major barrier to cure. J. Infect. Dis. 223, 13–21 (2021).
Das, B. et al. Estrogen receptor-1 is a key regulator of HIV-1 latency that imparts gender-specific restrictions on the latent reservoir. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E7795–E7804 (2018).
Szotek, E. L., Narasipura, S. D. & Al-Harthi, L. 17β-Estradiol inhibits HIV-1 by inducing a complex formation between β-catenin and estrogen receptor α on the HIV promoter to suppress HIV transcription. Virology 443, 375–383 (2013).
Ndung’u, T., McCune, J. M. & Deeks, S. G. Why and where an HIV cure is needed and how it might be achieved. Nature 576, 397–405 (2019).
Lifson, M. A. et al. Advances in biosensing strategies for HIV-1 detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic monitoring. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 103, 90–104 (2016).
Acknowledgements
T.M. received funding from Health Holland [grants LSHM19100-SGF and EMCLSH19023]; ZonMW [grant 40-44600-98-333] and a Building Synergistic Infrastructure for NL4Cure grant from Dutch Aidsfonds. C.L. received funding from the Dutch Aidsfonds (grants P-60602 and P-263). S.R. received funding from Dutch Aidsfonds [P-53302]. P.M. received funding from the South African Medical Research Council. The funders had no role in the study’s design and execution, data collection, management, analysis, interpretation, or the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, T.H., C.L., and T.M.; Methodology, T.H., C.L., and T.M.; Investigation, T.H., C.L., S.D.S., M.K., R.C., N.R., A.N., T.W.K., and K.R.; Funding Acquisition, T.M., S.R., C.L, P.M., and T.N.; Project Administration, T.M., S.R., R.J.P., P.M., K.R., and T.N.; Supervision, T.M.; Writing – Original Draft, T.H., C.L., S.D.S, M.K., and T.M.; Writing – Review & Editing, T.H., C.L., S.D.S, M.K., R.C., N.R, A.N., T.W.K., K.R., S.R., R.J.P., P.M., T.N., and T.M.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare the following competing interests: T.H., C.L., and T.M. are listed as inventors on the patent application filed by the Erasmus University Medical Center (EP23183103) on the methods for specific quantitation of the inducible HIV reservoir. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Medicine thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hossain, T., Lungu, C., de Schrijver, S. et al. Specific quantification of inducible HIV-1 reservoir by RT-LAMP. Commun Med 4, 123 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00553-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00553-4
- Springer Nature Limited