Abstract
Kramers nodal lines (KNLs) have recently been proposed theoretically as a special type of Weyl line degeneracy connecting time-reversal invariant momenta. KNLs are robust to spin orbit coupling and are inherent to all non-centrosymmetric achiral crystal structures, leading to unusual spin, magneto-electric, and optical properties. However, their existence in in real quantum materials has not been experimentally established. Here we gather the experimental evidence pointing at the presence of KNLs in SmAlSi, a non-centrosymmetric metal that develops incommensurate spin density wave order at low temperature. Using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, density functional theory calculations, and magneto-transport methods, we provide evidence suggesting the presence of KNLs, together with observing Weyl fermions under the broken inversion symmetry in the paramagnetic phase of SmAlSi. We discuss the nesting possibilities regarding the emergent magnetic orders in SmAlSi. Our results provide a solid basis of experimental observations for exploring correlated topology in SmAlSi
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Topology has emerged as a vibrant theme in modern condensed matter covering both gapped and gapless systems1,2,3,4,5. Owing to the translational symmetry breaking and crystalline symmetry protection, solid crystals exhibit unique topological quasiparticles taking the forms of point5,6,7,8, line9,10,11 and surface12,13,14,15 degeneracies in the electronic band structure. Particularly interesting scenarios occur for noncentrosymmetric materials. Under broken inversion symmetry (IS), not only can Weyl fermions (WFs) arise, but also in all achiral space groups where the mirror or roto-inversion symmetry and time reversal symmetry (TRS) are preserved, crystals host doubly-degenerate lines known as the Kramers nodal lines (KNLs) that connect time reversal invariant momentum (TRIM) points16,17. In contrast to nodal lines resulting from band inversion, the degeneracy of KNLs is robust against spin orbital coupling (SOC), and can only be lifted by explicitly breaking the mirror or roto-inversion symmetry. Therefore, when the KNLs cross the Fermi level, they produce touching points (spindle) or entire Fermi surfaces (octdong) that can be described by gapless Dirac fermions, leading to sizeable Berry curvature when gapped out by lifting the TRS, as well as quantized plateaus (thin film) or linear behavior (bulk limit) in optical conductivity for the latter case. When the mirror or roto-inversion symmetry is explicitly broken, the KNLs transform into Kramers Weyl points, which could lead to monopole-like electron spin texture, chiral magnetic effects, quantized circular photogalvanic effects18, or be utilized for constructing spin-orbit torque devices19. Furthermore, IS breaking could lead to effects on the superconductivity pairing mechanism20,21 and magnetic exchange interactions22 such as parity mixing and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Therefore, the presence of WFs and KNLs in noncentrosymmetric materials offers an appealing playground for studying the interplay between topology and many-body physics such as unconventional superconductivity23,24,25,26,27,28 and novel magnetism29,30,31,32.
Here we identify SmAlSi and its large isostructural family (LaPtSi-type) of materials to be candidates for hosting both KNLs and WFs33, existing in close proximity to the emergence of rich magnetic orders. WFs and surface Fermi arcs34,35,36, novel magnetic and transport phenomena such as anomalous Hall and anomalous Nernst effect37,38,39,40,41,42, loop Hall effect41,42, singular magnetoresistance43,44, quantum oscillations45,46,47, and tunable magnetic domains48,49,50 have recently been reported within this family. In addition, a Weyl-mediated Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) mechanism has been proposed in SmAlSi51 and isostructural NdAlSi52,53. However, no theory and experimental efforts have been devoted to elucidating the novel topological feature of KNLs and examining the Fermi surface (FS) nesting possibilities. In our work, using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES), density functional theory (DFT) calculations and quantum oscillation measurements, we provide evidence indicating this material family as viable candidates to host KNLs, in addition to numerous WFs appearing near the Fermi level, as observed in the paramagnetic state of SmAlSi. By a careful examination of the electronic structure near the Fermi level, we identify the wavevectors that could give rise to the potential nesting conditions in SmAlSi. Furthermore, a Lindhard susceptibility calculation is carried out to explore the origin of the incommensurate spin density wave (SDW). From a collective set of evidence including ARPES spectra on Fermi surface and at different temperatures, as well as first-principles calculations, it is suggested that the first SDW instability in SmAlSi is not likely to be purely driven by Weyl pocket nesting.
Results
Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties
SmAlSi crystallizes in the LaPtSi structure type with space group I41md (#109), consistent with previous reports54,55 (See details of the powder X-ray diffraction in Fig. S1). The crystal structure and its three-dimensional (3D) Brillouin zone (BZ) are shown in Fig. 1a and b. Additionally, the (001) surface projected BZ (orange) is also illustrated in Fig. 1b, where the high-symmetry points are labeled with a bar on top to distinguish from those of the bulk. We note that all the ARPES, DFT and quantum oscillation results below are based on the nonmagnetic structure presented here. To firmly establish the IS breaking in the crystal structure, we carried out second harmonic generation (SHG) measurements. At room temperature, we observe strong SHG response, with the SHG polar plots shown in Fig. 1e. Further fits (See Supplementary Note 1 for details) with the nonlinear susceptibility tensor associated with the point group C4v capture well the angle-dependent patterns in the polar plots, confirming the absence of IS.
To evaluate the topological electronic states in SmAlSi, we performed DFT calculations without and with SOC. The bulk band structures are shown in Fig. 1c, d. SOC generally lifts the band degeneracy except in the following two cases. First, the band degeneracy remains at the TRIM points due to the Kramers degeneracy18. Second, the band degeneracy can also be protected by achiral little group symmetry along certain lines that connect the TRIM points across the BZ, as suggested by recent theoretical work16,17. These are the KNLs (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Furthermore, as can be seen from Fig. 1d, an extra 4-fold degeneracy emerges at Z due to the nonsymmorphic symmetry of the crystal, in contrast to the 2-fold degeneracy at Γ (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Besides the KNLs, a series of Weyl points also appear, and both of these will be discussed in detail in the next two sections.
The magnetic properties of SmAlSi are relevant to the understanding of these topological states. We therefore characterize the magnetism in SmAlSi with magnetization, electrical resistivity and specific heat measurements. Figure 1f–h shows the μ0H = 0.1 T temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility, μ0H = 0 electrical resistivity and specific heat measurements, respectively. At low temperatures, they reveal two magnetic phase transitions, an antiferromagnetic transition at TN = 11.5 K, and a spin reorientation transition at T1 = 4.4 K, marked by the peaks in Cp and the derivatives d(MT)/dT and dρ/dT. This is consistent with a recent report51, while earlier work only observed the higher temperature transition at TN46,47,55. The high temperature inverse susceptibility (right axis, Fig. 1f) shows Curie-Weiss behavior up to ~ 150 K, and the corresponding linear fit (solid line) yields an effective moment \({\mu }_{{{{{{{{\rm{eff}}}}}}}}}^{\exp }\) = 0.96 μB, close to the predicted value for Sm3+, and a negative Weiss temperature θW = –53.2 K. In the following, we focus on the Γ − Z high symmetry direction to provide evidence of KNLs in the paramagnetic state of SmAlSi through a combination of first-principles calculations, soft X-ray (SX) and vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) ARPES.
Kramers nodal lines
Kramers nodal lines, which are doubly degenerate lines connecting TRIM points, are predicted to exist in all nonmagnetic noncentrosymmetric achiral crystals in the presence of SOC16. The topological nature of KNLs is manifested in a quantized winding number π, embodying a quantum version of Dirac solenoids. To date, KNLs remain a theoretical concept, with a number of proposed host materials. Here, we identify the family of compounds RAl(Si,Ge) (R = La - Sm) as viable hosts for KNLs. Notably, SmAlSi possesses two types of nodal lines in the presence of SOC, KNLs and those protected by nonsymmorphic symmetry (See Fig. S2g). A complete list of nodal lines in SmAlSi is included in the Supplementary Note 2. Here, we focus on the identification of the KNLs, as illustrated in Fig. 2a. The KNLs themselves can be separated into two types: those that connect different TRIM points and those that connect the same TRIM points. The representative of the first type is a straight KNL connecting TRIM points Γ and Z (marked by thick red line), which is protected by the C4v little cogroup along Γ − Z. A representative of the second type, the curved KNLs connecting the N points (blue curves lying within the kx = 0 and ky = 0 planes) is protected by the mirror symmetry and TRS.
To visualize the predicted KNL along Γ − Z, we carried out detailed photon-energy dependent ARPES investigations in both SX and VUV regimes on the (001) cleaving surface (Fig. S5 in Supplementary Note 3). SX measurements provide better kz resolution while VUV results in better energy and in-plane momentum resolution56. According to our DFT calculations (Fig. 1d), the KNL along Γ − Z closest to the Fermi level on the occupied side extends from −1.5 to −0.85 eV, and forms the band bottom of an electron band in the in-plane direction. A direct visualization of the Γ − Z KNLs is displayed in Fig. 2b, where surface states and kz broadening effects are well mitigated in the SX regime (see Fig. S5). DFT calculated bulk bands indicating the KNLs superimposed on the image (Fig. 2b) are in good agreements with SX ARPES data. We can also examine the KNL from measurements in the VUV regime. Specifically, from the in-plane directions along both Γ − Σ and Z − Σ1 we observe the KNL connecting to the electron band bottom, consistent with the prediction of the DFT calculations. The evolution of the KNL along kz can be better illustrated by the shift of the electron band bottom from a series of in-plane dispersions at different photon energies, where 114 eV and 132 eV approximately correspond to the kz = 2π/c and kz = 0 planes, respectively (Fig. 2d). Despite surface states and kz broadening effect in the VUV regime (Fig. S5), the spectral intensity shift from higher binding energy (at Z) to lower binding energy (near Γ) is evident in the energy distribution curves (EDCs) at the \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\) point taken from kz = 0, kz = π/c, and kz = 2π/c where the peak in the EDC corresponds to the calculated electron band bottom in the overlaid DFT bulk calculation (Fig. 2f), confirming the bulk KNLs along kz.
As both the theory and the data indicate the presence of KNLs protected by mirror symmetries through the combined studies of DFT and ARPES methods, we demonstrate the double degeneracy of the KNL from the in-plane direction. As seen from the DFT calculations (Fig. 1d), the bands connected to the KNLs are split due to SOC in the in-plane direction. Experimentally, we observe a band splitting along \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}-\bar{X}\) direction (Fig. 2c) in the band emanating from \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\). The splitting can be well resolved from a zoomed-in view marked by the red box, where the momentum distribution curve (MDC) shows clearly a double-peak structure that can be fitted by two Lorentzians on a constant background. From the comparison with an ab-initio surface calculation for the corresponding Γ − X cut in Fig. 2e, the observed band splitting should predominantly come from surface states. Nonetheless, from Figs. 1d and 2e, especially clear is the splitting of all bands away from \(\bar{{{\Gamma }}}\), regardless of their bulk or surface nature due to broken IS and preseved TRS, consistent with the 2-fold nature of the KNL along Γ − Z.
Weyl fermions
Besides KNLs, the lack of IS in SmAlSi also results in a system of WFs. WFs in both the paramagnetic and magnetic states have already been reported in isostructural compounds RAlSi/RAlGe33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,52. In SmAlSi, we identify a total of 56 WFs classified into 5 categories, W1, W2, W3, W3’ and W4 based on their locations in the BZ (Fig. 3a, b for the top and side views). As shown in Fig. 3b and Table 1, we find three types of WFs (W1, W3, and W3’) that are pinned to the kz = 0 plane by the \({C}_{2z}\hat{{{{{{{{\mathcal{T}}}}}}}}}\) symmetry (solid circles), while W2 and W4 WFs are symmetrically distributed on the two sides of the kz = 0 plane (empty circles). To show the Weyl fermion band dispersions, we take 6 cuts (see Fig. 3a for positions) measured in the VUV regime, overlaid by the DFT bulk calculations (Fig. 3e, f). The corresponding ab-initio surface calculations are also shown in Fig. 3g, h. We discuss the detailed band comparison and assigment in the Supplementary Note 4. Nonetheless, the consistency between calculation and ARPES observation is evident. For instance, Cut 1 shows the linear bulk dispersion below W1 and its parabolic behavior at deeper binding energies. Cut 3 shows mainly three hole-like band features well captured by the ab-initio calculation projected onto the surface, with the middle one forming W2. In particular, we find the best match between DFT and ARPES data near W1 and W2 after shifting the DFT bands up by 33 meV, which is determined by our quantum oscillations experiments described below. For bands in the W3, W3’ and W4 region, however, an upward shift of 120 meV is needed for both bulk (magenta lines) and surface calculations to capture the two hole-like bands in Cut 4 and 5, as well as the W-like dispersion in the middle part of Cut 6 (see Fig. 3f, h). Crucially, we find that the experimentally observed upper hole-like bands in Cut 4 and Cut 5 are related with the Fermi arc states, while the lower hole bands correspond to the bulk bands below WFs pointed out in Cut 4, 5, and 6 of Fig. 3f. We emphasize that the observed VUV spectra here (Fig. 3e, f) have strong surface contribution. Therefore, band assignment is not a straightforward task, and we discuss it in detail in Supplementary Note 4. To further understand the band structure near the W3’-W3-W4 region, Fig. 3c shows a measured FS in the second quadrant where a dumbbell-like pattern with two tilted ends is observed. The intensities on the two ends mainly consist of the Fermi arc states (upper bands in Cut 4 and Cut 5 in Fig. 3f) at the Fermi level connecting WFs, while the bar in the middle of the dumbbell comes from the bulk bands below WFs (hole band top below W3 at EF in Cut 6 and lower bands in Cut 4 and 5 of Fig. 3f). Their band dispersions are further investigated by two loop cuts (red loop 1 and blue loop 2) taken on Fig. 3c. Such method has been implemented to distinguish Fermi arcs from normal bands35,36. The results are displayed in Fig. 3d. Clearly, one can see a two-band configuration here (green dashed guideline for the Fermi arc band and magenta dashed guideline for the bulk band in Fig. 3d1 and d3). The upper green band shows a right-moving and a left-moving chiral mode in Loop 1 and Loop 2, respectively, further supporting its Fermi arc origin. The lower magenta band, identified as the bulk band below WFs contributing to the bar of the dumbbell, connects back to itself after taking a full Loop 1 or 2, despite that its intensities are suppressed at the boundary of the loop likely due to the matrix element effects.
Since VUV ARPES is more surface sensitive and subject to kz broadening of bulk bands, as exemplified by the comparison in Fig. 3e–h, we further conducted SX ARPES to confirm the bulk nature of the WFs. Figure 3i–l shows the SX data for W1, W2, W3’ and W3, superimposed by bulk calculations (magenta lines), where the bulk nature of those WFs is confirmed by the excellent agreement between calculations and experiment. Moreover, to visualize the Fermi arcs directly connected to W3, W3’, and W4 WFs above the Fermi level, we show the calculated DFT surface constant energy contours (Fig. 3m1-m3) at the respective Weyl fermion energy positions (Table 1). Fermi arcs can be clearly seen in each case.
In addition to ARPES, we have also performed angle-dependent quantum oscillations (QOs) measurements to corroborate the understanding of the FS and the underlying topology. The resistivity measurements are performed in the paramagnetic state (at T = 12 K > TN), with the magnetic field oriented in the bc plane and the current applied along the a axis (Fig. 4b). After a smooth background subtraction, strong Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations are observed for all measured field orientations (Fig. 4a). The oscillation frequencies are obtained from Fast Fourier Transforms of the measured data (Fig. 4a), and are plotted as contour maps in Fig. 4d, e. We further compare the measured oscillation frequencies with Fermi surface cross sections from DFT calculations, where the proportionality between quantum oscillation frequencies F and extremal Fermi surface Aext is given by the Onsager relationship:
where ℏ is the Planck constant and e is the electron charge. The DFT calculations with SOC (Fig. 1d) indicate four bands crossing the Fermi energy, each forming two small Fermi pockets with distinct shapes in the first BZ. We notice that the Fermi pocket locations in the DFT calculation with SOC are similar to those without SOC as previously reported47. As a result of the broken IS and SOC, the band degeneracy is lifted and the number of pockets is doubled. These pockets are denoted as α1,2, β1,2, γ1,2, η1,2 with the subscript 1 and 2 representing the pair of SOC-split bands, as shown in Fig. 4c. We identify the QOs from pockets α1 and β1 in the Shubnikov-de Haas signal, as the trend of extremal Fermi surface cross section from DFT (symbols in Fig. 4d, e) matches well with observed values after an upshift of 33 meV. Given that those pockets and corresponding bands are responsible for the W1 Weyl points and W2 Weyl points, our results provide strong evidence that those Weyl points are located close to the Fermi energy as predicted in the DFT and observed by ARPES.
We now consider the relation between the magnetic order in SmAlSi (Fig. 1f–h) and the electronic properties embedded in the FS determined experimentally (ARPES and QOs) and theoretically (DFT). In the isostructural compound NdAlSi, it has recently been proposed that Weyl pockets could give rise to nesting-induced incommensurate SDW52. To evaluate this possibility in the case of SmAlSi, we note that our experimentally-observed FS shows a flat dispersion that could potentially provide nesting conditions along the (110) direction (see Fig. 3c and the qN denoted in Fig. 5a), where the incommensurate magnetic wavevector was observed below TN = 11.5 K51. Importantly, the nesting feature consists of the lower hole-like bands emphasized in Fig. 3d (magenta dashed lines) and Fig. 3f, rather than any Weyl fermion bands. Further assessing the nesting condidtion quantitatively, five cuts perpendicular to the nesting feature are extracted for momentum distribution curve (MDC) analysis (Fig. 5b), where we fit the peak locations in each MDC taken from EF to extract the location of the Fermi surface (see details in Fig. S7). The fitted peak values are subsequently plotted in Fig. 5a, b. From the average of the fitted positions (see Fig. 5d), we find a wavevector of qN = (0.74,0.74,0) that connects the experimentally observed flat features across the BZ, as schematically illustrated in Fig. 5a (see Supplementary Note 5 for details). Such nesting wavevector is also corroborated by the auto-correlation analysis presented in the Supplementary Information Fig. S9. We do note that the incommensurability is likely sensitive to sample-dependent variations of the chemical potential, and careful comparison of this with precise determination of the magnetic wavevector is important to establish the mechanism of nesting-driven magnetic order in this material. To match the wavevector observed by neutron scattering51, a large shift of 100 meV of the chemical potential would be needed (see Fig. S8). Furthermore, to check for nesting instability, we carried out Lindhard susceptibility calculations after adjusting the chemical potential shift between experimental and DFT data. The bulk FS is shown in Fig. 5c with nesting vectors of interest indicated by q1, q2, and q3. Consequently, the imaginary part of the Lindhard function peaks at q1 = (0.44 ± 0.04, 0.44 ± 0.04, 0) and q2 = (0.70 ± 0.04, 0.70 ± 0.04, 0) (Fig. 5e). However, no peaks are found in the real part of the Lindhard function (Fig. 5f), hence casting further doubt on a nesting-driven scenario57,58. Here ± 0.04 represents the range of sub-peaks upon the main nesting vectors which is due to the various nesting possibilities for the two Weyl pockets with finite sizes. The unit of the nesting vectors is set as half of the BZ length, in order to be consistent with previous studies on NdAlSi52 and SmAlSi51. To recover the conventional unit which is the length of the reciprocal vectors, an extra ratio 1/2 should be multiplied to the original q1,2, as well as the observed q in ARPES. In addition, we note that the Weyl fermions in SmAlSi originate from the Sm atomic orbitals instead of the electron spin (Fig. S4), which can affect the form of the Weyl-nesting-induced RKKY interaction and may lead to novel magnetic orders.
Discussion and conclusion
Using both experimental measurements (ARPES and QOs) and theoretical calculations (DFT), we have presented evidence suggesting the presence of KNLs hosted by the paramagnetic phase of SmAlSi, located away from the Fermi level. Therefore, further investigation, both theoretical and experimental, to disambiguate the presence of KNLs and optimize them for the appearance of topological responses in transport or optics experiments are crucial. It is important to note that KNLs are distinct from the nodal lines resulting from band inversion. The former are robust against SOC and protected by the combination of the TRS and achiral crystal symmetries while the latter are not. This mechanism also offers an avenue for tunability such that, when the mirror or roto-inversion symmetries are broken, the KNL metal can be transformed into Kramers Weyl semimetal. Regarding the magnetism that emerges in SmAlSi, our evaluation of the possible nesting conditions using measured and calculated FS reveals that the potential nesting wavevectors deviate from the incommensurate SDW wavevector near 1/3 or 2/3 measured by neutron experiments51, and the real part of the Lindhard function does not show any prominent peak structure (See Fig. 5f). Note that it is meaningful to compare the band structure of SmAlSi in its paramagnetic state with its lower-temperature magnetic wavevector, since the material spontaneously condenses to the magnetic state without external field. In principle, fully spin polarized state is a result of field-driven crossover but not regarded as an onset of any instabilities. Furthermore, the low-temperature ARPES data summarized in Supplementary Note 6 Fig. S10 and Fig. S11 do not show band reconstruction related to the magnetic phase transition, consistent with a recent report59. Therefore, it is unlikely that the SDW is purely driven by a Weyl pocket nesting instability. Considering the broken IS in this material, Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction could play an important role in stabilizing the spiral order, while the RKKY interaction should be mediated by both conventional60 and Weyl electrons. The discrepancy between the magnetic wavevector and FS nesting conditions might come from higher-order spin-spin interactions. Further studies on such a mechanism are required to account for why certain magnetic wavevectors eventually become energetically favorable. Given the range of exotic magnetic structures that develop at low temperatures in the LaPtSi type family of compounds33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52, this family of materials provides an ideal platform to study novel band topology and its interplay with many-body phenomena especially regarding the spin degree of freedom.
Methods
Crystal growth
Single crystals of SmAlSi were grown by a self-flux method. Sm, Al and Si were used as starting elements and were mixed with composition Sm:Al:Si=1:10:1 in an alumina crucible, and sealed up in an evacuated quartz tube. The tube was heated up to 1000 ∘C in 6 h, held for 12 h and the excess flux decanted at 700 ∘C after a cooling at 0.1 ∘C min−1.
Transport and magnetization measurements
Transport and magnetization measurements were performed in a Quantum Design Dynacool Physical Property Measurement System. The electrical resistivity was measured with a standard four-probe technique and the heat capacity was measured with a relaxation method. The magnetization is measured using the vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) option.
Second harmonic generation
The SHG measurement is performed at room temperature. We use a Ti-Sapphire laser (30 fs, 80 MHz) with a central wavelength of 800 nm. The laser is focused on the (001) facet under 45 degree incidence by a 10X objective. The beam diameter is estimated to be 10 μm. The SHG light is collected by a lens, and then into a photo-multiplier tube. The polarizations of the incident light and the detecting light are simultaneously controlled by a half-wave plate and a linear polarizer respectively.
ARPES measurements
Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) measurements in the vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) regime were performed at the Advanced Light Source, Beamline 4.0.3 (MERLIN), equipped with a SCIENTA R8000 analyzer, and at Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL), Beamline 5-2, equipped with a DA30 electron analyzer. The single crystals were cleaved in-situ at 13 K (above any magnetic transition temperature of SmAlSi) and measured in ultra-high vacuum with a base pressure better than 5 × 10−11 Torr. Photon energy-dependent measurements were carried out from 30 to 180 eV. Energy and angular resolution were set to be better than 10 meV and 0.1∘, respectively, for data obtained below 60 eV. Soft X-ray (SX) ARPES measurements were performed at the QMSC beamline of the Canadian Light Source, equipped with a R4000 electron analyzer. SmAlSi samples were cleaved in-situ and measured under a vacuum condition better than 6 × 10−11 Torr and temperature stabilized at 17 K. The energy and angular resolution of the SX measurements are around 120 meV and 0.3∘, respectively. All the data shown are taken using linear horizontal (LH) light polarization. The VUV experimental setups use vertical analyzer slit while the SX experimental setup uses a horizontal analyzer slit. Therefore the LH polarization for the VUV (SX) ARPES experimental geometry is perpendicular (parallel) to the cut direction.
DFT calculations
We used the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)61 with the Perdew-Berke-Ernzerhof’s (PBE) exchange-correlation functional in the generalized-gradient approximation62,63 to perform the density functional theory (DFT) calculations64. We adopted the experimental lattice constants and crystal structure (shown as the cif file of Supplementary Data 1). As we focused on the nonmagnetic phase, the 4f electrons of Sm atoms were kept in the core. Both cases without and with spin-orbit coupling (SOC) were calculated, and a Wannier tight-binding model was further obtained through the Wannier90 package65, which accurately fits the DFT bands with the inclusion of SOC. From this Wannier model, we studied in detail all the topological crossings including the KNLs, Weyl nodes and the hourglass nodal lines in the nonmagnetic SmAlSi. To achieve the best match between ARPES data and DFT calculation of the WFs, we used a 0.15 eV surface potential for first-principles surface calculation (See Supplementary Information Fig. S3).
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
References
Chiu, C. K. et al. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010).
Qi, X. L. & Zhang, S. C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057 (2011).
Bernevig, B. A. & Hughes, T. L. Topological insulators and topological superconductors. (Princeton University Press, 2013).
Armitage, N. P., Mele, E. J. & Vishwanath, A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015001 (2018).
Bradlyn, B. et al. Beyond Weyl and Dirac fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals. Science 353, aaf5037 (2016).
Tang, P., Zhou, Q. & Zhang, S. C. Multiple types of topological fermions in transition metal silicides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 206402 (2017).
Wieder, B. J. et al. Double Dirac semimetals in three dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 186402 (2016).
Bzdušek, T. et al. Nodal-chain metals. Nature 538, 75–78 (2016).
Fang, C. et al. Topological nodal line semimetals. Chin. Phys. B 25, 117106 (2016).
Yang, S. et al. Symmetry demanded topological nodal-line materials. Adv. Phys.: X 3, 1414631 (2018).
Xiao, M. & Fan, S. Topologically charged nodal surface. arXiv: 1709.02363 https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.02363 (2018).
Wu, W. et al. Nodal surface semimetals: Theory and material realization. Phys. Rev. B 97, 115125 (2018).
Kim, S., Ryu, D. C. & Yang, B. J. Linking structures of doubly charged nodal surfaces in centrosymmetric superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 103, 224523 (2021).
Wilde, M. A. et al. Symmetry-enforced topological nodal planes at the Fermi surface of a chiral magnet. Nature 594, 374–379 (2021).
Xie, Y. et al. Kramers nodal line metals. Nat. Commun. 12, 3064 (2021).
Hirschmann, M. M. et al. Symmetry-enforced band crossings in tetragonal materials: Dirac and Weyl degeneracies on points, lines, and planes. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 054202 (2021).
Chang, G. et al. Topological quantum properties of chiral crystals. Nat. Mater. 17, 978–985 (2018).
He, W. Y., Xu, X. Y. & Law, K. T. Kramers Weyl semimetals as quantum solenoids and their applications in spin-orbit torque devices. Commun. Phys. 4, 66 (2021).
Non-centrosymmetric superconductors: Introduction and overview. (Springer, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24624-1.
Yip, S. Noncentrosymmetric superconductors. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 5, 15–33 (2014).
Ghimire, N. J. Complex magnetism in noncentrosymmetric magnets. (University of Tennessee, 2013). https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2427/.
Li, Y. & Haldane, F. D. M. Topological Nodal Cooper Pairing in Doped Weyl Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 067003 (2018).
Shang, T. et al. Spin-triplet superconductivity in Weyl nodal-line semimetals. npj Quantum Mater. 7, 35 (2022).
Bhattacharyya, A. et al. Evidence of a nodal line in the superconducting gap symmetry of noncentrosymmetric ThCoC2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 147001 (2019).
Xu, X. et al. Quantum oscillations in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor and topological nodal-line semimetal PbTaSe2. Phys. Rev. B. 99, 104516 (2019).
Guan, S. et al. Superconducting topological surface states in the noncentrosymmetric bulk superconductor PbTaSe2. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600894 (2016).
Shang, T. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in topological Kramers nodal-line semimetals. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq6589 (2022).
Ning, W. & Mao, Z. Recent advancements in the study of intrinsic magnetic topological insulators and magnetic Weyl semimetals. APL Mater. 8, 090701 (2020).
Zou, J., He, Z. & Xu, G. The study of magnetic topological semimetals by first principles calculations. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 96 (2019).
Duan, H. et al. Anisotropic RKKY interactions in nodal-line semimetals. Phys. Rev. B. 102, 165110 (2020).
Wang, Z., Liu, D. & Zou, L. RKKY interaction of magnetic impurities in nodal-line semimetals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 553, 169164 (2022).
Chang, G. et al. Magnetic and noncentrosymmetric Weyl fermion semimetals in the RAlGe family of compounds. Phys. Rev. B 97, 041104 (2018).
Xu, S. et al. Discovery of Lorentz-violating type II Weyl fermions in LaAlGe. Sci. Adv. 3, e1603266 (2017).
Sanchez, D. S. et al. Observation of Weyl fermions in a magnetic noncentrosymmetric crystal. Nat. Commun. 11, 3356 (2020).
Sakhya, A. P. et al. Observation of Fermi arcs and Weyl nodes in a noncentrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, L051202 (2023).
Liu, W. et al. Critical behavior of the magnetic Weyl semimetal PrAlGe. Phys. Rev. B. 103, 214401 (2021).
Zhao, J. et al. Field-induced tricritical phenomenon and magnetic structures in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate NdAlGe. New. J. Phys. 24, 013010 (2022).
Meng, B. et al. Large anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal candidate PrAlGe. APL Mater. 7, 051110 (2019).
Destraz, D. et al. Magnetism and anomalous transport in the Weyl semimetal PrAlGe: possible route to axial gauge fields. npj Quantum Mater. 5, 5 (2020).
Yang, H. et al. Noncollinear ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal with anisotropic anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B. 103, 115143 (2021).
Piva, M. M. et al. Topological features in the ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi: Role of domain walls. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 013068 (2023).
Suzuki, T. et al. Singular angular magnetoresistance in a magnetic nodal semimetal. Scinece 365, 377–381 (2019).
Wang, J. et al. NdAlSi: A magnetic Weyl semimetal candidate with rich magnetic phases and atypical transport properties. Phys. Rev. B 105, 144435 (2022).
Wang, J. et al. New type of quantum oscillations stemmed from the strong Weyl fermions - 4f electrons exchange interaction. arXiv: 2201.06412 (2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.06412.
Xu, L. et al. Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations and nontrivial topological state in Weyl semimetal candidate SmAlSi. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 34, 485701 (2022).
Cao, W. et al. Quantum oscillations in noncentrosymmetric Weyl semimetal SmAlSi. Chin. Phys. Lett. 39, 047501 (2022).
Sun, Y. et al. Mapping domain wall topology in the magnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi. Phys. Rev. B 104, 235119 (2021).
Xu, B. et al. Directional field-dependence of tunable magnetic domains in noncentrosymmetric ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi. arXiv: 2105. 14384 (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.14384.
Xu, B. et al. Picoscale magnetoelasticity governs heterogeneous magnetic domains in a noncentrosymmetric ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal. Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2000101 (2021).
Yao, X. et al. Large topological hall effect and spiral magnetic order in the Weyl Semimetal SmAlSi. Phys. Rev. X 13, 011035 (2023).
Gaudet, J. et al. Weyl-mediated helical magnetism in NdAlSi. Nat. Mater. 20, 1650–1656 (2021).
Nikolić, P. Dynamics of local magnetic moments induced by itinerant Weyl electrons. Phys. Rev. B 103, 155151 (2021).
Pikus, S. et al. X-ray powder diffraction analysis and initial Rietveld characterization of SmAlSi and SmAlGe. Powder Diffr. 19, 359–361 (2004).
Wang, T., Guo, Y. & Wang, C. Structure and magnetic properties of RAlSi (R = light rare earth). Chin. Phys. B 30, 075102 (2021).
Sobota, J. A., He, Y. & Shen, Z. Angle-resolved photoemission studies of quantum materials. Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025006 (2021).
Johannes, M. D. & Mazin, I. I. Fermi surface nesting and the origin of charge density waves in metals. Phys. Rev. B 77, 165135 (2008).
Inosov, D. S. et al. Electronic structure and nesting-driven enhancement of the RKKY interaction at the magnetic ordering propagation vector in Gd2PdSi3 and Tb2PdSi3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 046401 (2009).
Lou, R. et al. Signature of weakly coupled f electrons and conduction electrons in magnetic Weyl semimetal candidates PrAlSi and SmAlSi. Phys. Rev. B. 107, 035158 (2023).
Wang, Z. et al. Skyrmion crystal from RKKY interaction mediated by 2D electron gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 207201 (2020).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Langreth, D. C. & Mehl, M. J. Beyond the local-density approximation in calculations of ground-state electronic properties. Phys. Rev. B 28, 1809–1834 (1983).
Hohenberg, M. J. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964).
Pizzi, G. et al. Wannier90 as a community code: new features and applications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 165902 (2020).
Acknowledgements
We thank Zhentao Wang, Gregory Mccandless and Julia Chan for useful discussions. This work was mainly supported by the Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research under Grant No. FA9550-21-1-0343. This research used resources of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, which is supported by the U.S. Department Of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515. Part of the research described in this work was also performed at the Canadian Light Source, a national research facility of the University of Saskatchewan, which is supported by Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), the National Research Council (NRC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Government of Saskatchewan, and the University of Saskatchewan. The ARPES work at Rice University was also supported by the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation’s EPiQS Initiative through grant No. GBMF9470. EM acknowledges partial support from the the Robert A. Welch Foundation grant C-2114. K.T.L. acknowledges the support of HKRGC through RFS2021-6S03, C6025-19G, AoE/P-701/20, 16307622, 16310520 and 16310219. Work at University of California, Berkeley, is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under Contract No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 (Quantum Materials program KC2202). The SHG experiment is supported by the Vagelos Institute of Energy Science and Technology graduate fellowship and the Dissertation Completion Fellowship at the University of Pennsylvania. L.W. acknowledges the support by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-22-1-0410.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The project was organized by M.Y., E.M., and K.T.L.. The sample synthesis and characterization was carried out by Y.G., S.L., and E.M.. The ARPES work was done by Y.Z., J.O., J.H., Z.Y., M.Y., and R.J.B., with the help of J.D., M.H., D.L,. M.Z., and S.G.. The SHG was carried out by Z.N. and L.W.. The first-principles calculations were carried out by X.G. and K.T.L.. Y.Z., Y.G., and X.G. contributed equally to this work. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests. Professor M.Y. is an Editorial Board Member for Communications Physics, but was not involved in the editorial review of, or the decision to publish, this article.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Gao, XJ. et al. Kramers nodal lines and Weyl fermions in SmAlSi. Commun Phys 6, 134 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01257-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-023-01257-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Tunable positions of Weyl nodes via magnetism and pressure in the ferromagnetic Weyl semimetal CeAlSi
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Spin order and dynamics in the topological rare-earth germanide semimetals
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy (2024)
-
Nonlinear optical diode effect in a magnetic Weyl semimetal
Nature Communications (2024)
-
Emergence of Weyl fermions by ferrimagnetism in a noncentrosymmetric magnetic Weyl semimetal
Nature Communications (2023)