Abstract
New phases of matter emerge at the edge of magnetic instabilities, which can occur in materials with moments that are localized, itinerant or intermediate between these extremes. In local moment systems, such as heavy fermions, the magnetism can be tuned towards a zero-temperature transition at a quantum critical point (QCP) via pressure, chemical doping, and, rarely, magnetic field. By contrast, in itinerant moment systems, QCPs are more rare, and they are induced by pressure or doping; there are no known examples of field induced transitions. This means that no universal behaviour has been established across the whole itinerant-to-local moment range—a substantial gap in our knowledge of quantum criticality. Here we report an itinerant antiferromagnet, Ti3Cu4, that can be tuned to a QCP by a small magnetic field. We see signatures of quantum criticality and the associated non-Fermi liquid behaviour in thermodynamic and transport measurements, while band structure calculations point to an orbital-selective, spin density wave ground state, a consequence of the square net structural motif in Ti3Cu4. Ti3Cu4 thus provides a platform for the comparison and generalisation of quantum critical behaviour across the whole spectrum of magnetism.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Quantum critical points (QCPs) emerge upon the continuous (second order) suppression of magnetic order to zero temperature via non-thermal tuning parameters such as doping, pressure or magnetic field. The interplay of magnetism, electron correlations, and quantum critical fluctuations in the vicinity of quantum phase transitions (QPTs) has been linked to novel emergent physics like unconventional superconductivity1,2,3,4, non-Fermi liquid (NFL) behavior5,6,7,8, and heavy fermion behavior9,10,11.
Even though QPTs have been induced by pressure and doping in numerous systems, including local and itinerant magnetic compounds, these tuning parameters present experimental challenges: the former often requires experimentally difficult high pressure values to suppress the transition to T = 0, while the latter results in convoluted effects of disorder and quantum criticality, often difficult to resolve separately. Magnetic field appears as an advantageous tuning parameter to study quantum criticality12, although there are much fewer experimental observations of field-induced QCPs. Field induced quantum criticality has been reported in the heavy-fermions YbRh2Si213,14,15, YbAgGe16, CePdAl17, CeCoIn518, CeAuSb219, YbPtIn20, CePtIn421, Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs) in quantum magnets22, or the metamagnets with either f electrons as in CeRu2Si223 and UCoAl24, or d electrons in Sr3Ru2O725,26,27,28. No universal behavior can so far be established across the whole itinerant-to-local moment range11,29,30,31,32, in large because of the complexities associated with local moments hybridizing with conduction electrons. It thus seems advantageous to study purely itinerant magnets, i.e., magnetic systems with no partially filled electronic shells. While the only known such itinerant magnets ZrZn233,34, Sc3.1In35,36, and TiAu37,38, have been tuned to QCPs by doping, the lack of experimental observation of field-induced QCPs in the extreme limit of itinerant moments is likely a reflection of the larger magnetic energy scales associated with d-electron systems compared to their f-electron counterparts. Furthermore, the magnetism in Cr, the prototypical spin-density wave (SDW) system, can be suppressed to a QCP with doping39,40 or pressure41, but magnetic field has little or no effect on the ordering temperature42. On the other hand, Sr3Ru2O725,26,27,28, a paramagnet in zero magnetic field, can be tuned to a quantum critical end point, where a line of first-order itinerant metamagnetic transitions terminates at T = 0, motivating further theories of first-order metamagnetic itinerant quantum criticality31,32. Thus the experimental realization of a field-induced second-order QPT in a purely itinerant magnetic system has until now remained elusive.
Here we report evidence of itinerant antiferromagnetism (AFM) in metallic Ti3Cu4, where Ti and Cu have empty or filled d shells, and therefore neither carry a local moment. The Néel temperature TN = 11.3 K is continuously suppressed to zero at a magnetic field-induced QCP at a critical field Hc = 4.87 T. Concurrently, the magnetic Grüneisen ratio \({{{\Gamma }}}_{H}\,=\,\frac{1}{T}{\left.\frac{\partial T}{\partial H}\right|}_{S}\) diverges as H → Hc and T → 0, with a sign change and divergence in T at H = Hc, accompanied by a NFL-FL crossover. The continuous suppression of the magnetic order to T = 0 by magnetic field, together with the divergence of thermodynamic properties (such as the magnetic Grüneisen ratio) are the benchmarks for identifying QPTs. Ti3Cu4 provides a unique platform to study a field-induced QCP at a low field scale for a d-electron itinerant magnet, and without the complexities of the interplay between local and itinerant moments.
Results and discussion
Crystal structure
Flux-grown single crystals of Ti3Cu4 form as flat plates, with typical dimensions of 2 mm × 2 mm × 0.5 mm (Fig. 1). Ti3Cu4 crystallizes in the tetragonal I4/mmm space group43. The crystal growth and structural characterization details are given in the Methods. X-ray diffraction measurements with the beam incident on the as-grown surface reveal a series of sharp (00l) Bragg reflections shown in Fig. 1a, consistent with the I4/mmm symmetry. This layered structure shown in Fig. 1b contains two different crystallographic sites for both Cu (light and dark red) and Ti (light and dark blue). Alternating layers of Ti are arranged in buckled (Ti1) and square (Ti2) nets, separated by staggered buckled nets of Cu. The connectivity of the Ti2 atoms in Ti3Cu4 is likely responsible for its remarkable electronic and magnetic properties, as discussed in the Electronic structure subsection.
Antiferromagnetic order
The DC magnetic susceptibility M(T)/H for H = 0.1 T (Fig. 1c, full symbols, left axis), shows Curie-Weiss-like temperature dependence, with no irreversibility in the field-cooled (FC) and zero-field-cooled (ZFC) data. Throughout the paper, only ZFC data is shown for clarity. Indeed, the inverse susceptibility H/ΔM is linear in T down to ~20 K (Fig. 1c, open symbols, right axis), where ΔM = M − M0 corresponds to the magnetization after a small temperature-independent Pauli term, M0 = 4.5 × 10−4 emu(molF.U.)−1, has been subtracted. In the same temperature range, the zero field, H = 0, resistivity ρ(T) measurements (Fig. 1d) reveal the metallic character of Ti3Cu4; ρ(T) decreases monotonically with decreasing temperature, T, before a drop at the lowest temperatures. Together, these two measurements provide preliminary indication of itinerant moment magnetism in Ti3Cu4, which will be more convincingly demonstrated once the nature of the low temperature phase transition is established.
The low temperature thermodynamic and transport data show that a phase transition in Ti3Cu4 occurs around 11 K (Fig. 1e-g), first revealed by the small peak in the specific heat scaled by temperature Cp/T (symbols, Fig. 1e, left axis). While such a transition could have a structural component, this is ruled out by single crystal elastic neutron scattering measurements (discussed in the Experimental determination of the magnetic propogation vector subsection) that show no detectable change to the crystal structure down to 5 K. The antiferromagnetic order at TN = 11.3 K is confirmed by the H = 0 susceptibility χ(T) and electrical resistivity ρ(T) (Fig. 1f,g). Anisotropic χ(T) data (determined from low H magnetization isotherms M(H), detailed in Supplementary Note 1) reveal a peak at TN for H∥ab (red symbols, Fig. 1f), and a nearly temperature-independent plateau below TN for H∥c (grey symbols, Fig. 1f). In a local moment picture, such magnetic anisotropy would be consistent with an AFM ordered state; the susceptibility peaks at TN when the field is parallel to the direction of the ordered moments. The implication for the itinerant AFM order in Ti3Cu4 is that the moments are likely oriented within the ab plane, consistent with the neutron scattering experiments discussed in the Experimental determination of the magnetic propogation vector subsection. Upon cooling through TN, a drop in resistivity signals loss of spin-disorder scattering (full symbols, Fig. 1g), with a peak in the resistivity derivative dρ/dT, coincident with the peak in Cp/T and susceptibility derivative d(χT)/dT (for a detailed comparison see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2)44,45.
Evidence for bulk magnetism
Muon spin relaxation (μSR) measurements were performed, in order to confirm that the magnetic order at TN = 11.3 K in Ti3Cu4 is intrinsic, and not arising from a small impurity phase. Several representative muon decay asymmetry spectra P(t) are plotted in Fig. 2a. A small H = 10 Oe field was applied to decouple any relaxation due to nuclear dipoles. From 12 to 20 K, P(t) is temperature independent and exhibits slow relaxation, consistent with a paramagnetic state. Upon cooling through TN = 11.3 K, there is a sharp increase in the relaxation at early times. Within the magnetically ordered state, P(t) takes a characteristic Kubo-Toyabe form46 with a minimum at early times followed by a recovery to 1/3 of the initial asymmetry. The solid lines in Fig. 2a are fits to P(t) of the following form:
Muons that land in the non-magnetic fraction of the sample, 1 − fmag, experience a weak temperature-independent exponential relaxation. The magnetic fraction of the sample, fmag, is well-described by a combined Kubo-Toyabe function, where the Gaussian relaxation is given by σ and the Lorentzian relaxation by λ. The dynamics in the 1/3 tail are phenomenologically captured by the inclusion of an exponential relaxation. The temperature dependence of the fitted parameters, fmag, σ, and λ, are presented in Fig. 2b, where each is observed to sharply increase below TN = 11.3 K. At the lowest temperatures, fmag (full circles, left axis) is close to 100%, confirming that the magnetsim in Ti3Cu4 is an intrinsic bulk property. The static nature of the magnetic order is confirmed through longitudinal field μSR measurements, where the relaxation is significantly decoupled by fields as small as H = 50 Oe and fully decoupled by a field of H = 500 Oe (open triangles, Fig. 2a).
Experimental determination of the magnetic propogation vector
With μSR measurements confirming the intrinsic magnetism, we performed single crystal elastic neutron scattering measurements to investigate the nature of the magnetically ordered state in Ti3Cu4. Measurements above (T = 20 K) and below TN (T = 5 K) reveal the formation of magnetic Bragg peaks on several high symmetry positions, including (100) and (001), as shown in the rocking curve scans in Fig. 3a, b (for all measured reflections see Supplementary Fig. 4). The double peak that appears for (001) and the other reflections with a non-zero l component are not intrinsic, but rather the result of two closely aligned grains. The intensity of the (100) and (001) Bragg peaks (measured both on warming and cooling) as a function of temperature is presented in Fig. 3c, confirming that the onset of magnetic order occurs at TN = 11.3 K without measurable hysteresis. While the (001) and (100) Bragg peaks were measured in different sample geometries, and therefore their intensities cannot be directly compared, it is nonetheless evident that (001) is significantly more intense than (100), indicative of ordered moments that lie in the ab-plane, consistent with the low field susceptibility.
The commensurate positions where magnetic Bragg peaks form in Ti3Cu4 are not allowed by the body-centered selection rules (h + k + l = 2n) for the I4/mmm structure and therefore no nuclear Bragg peaks are observed on these positions. We can index these magnetic Bragg reflections with a propagation vector of k = (001). We proceed by assuming that, as indicated by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations discussed in the Electronic structure subsection, the magnetism in Ti3Cu4 originates from the conduction bands of the Ti atoms which occupy the 2b Wyckoff site (Ti2). It should be emphasized that the neutron data cannot independently distinguish which of the atomic sites in Ti3Cu4 is responsible for the magnetism. There are two symmetry-allowed irreducible representations for the 2b Wyckoff site with a k = (001) propagation vector within the I4/mmm space group: Γ3 (c-axis antiferromagnet) and Γ9 (ab-plane antiferromagnet). While both of these magnetic structures produce Bragg peaks at (100), only Γ9 yields intense reflections at (001) and (003), consistent with our experiment. The periodicity of this structure is shown in Fig. 3d, consistent with a transverse commensurate spin density wave (SDW) order. Linear combinations of the two basis vectors that make up Γ9 allow a continuous rotation within the ab-plane. We note that we cannot determine the exact moment orientation in an unpolarized neutron experiment. The magnitude of the ordered moment, which was estimated by comparing the intensity of the nuclear and magnetic reflections in the (h0l) plane measurements and assuming a Ti3+ magnetic form factor, is 0.17(5) μB. The result is in good agreement with the high field magnetization data discussed in the next subsection Evidence for itinerant magnetism.
Evidence for itinerant magnetism
With the bulk antiferromagnetic magnetic order below TN firmly established, we turn to further evidence of itinerant moment magnetism in Ti3Cu4. Recalling the linear inverse susceptibility of Ti3Cu4 (Fig. 1c), we recognize it as a signature of either local or itinerant moment magnetism, albeit with very different origins. For the former case, mean field theory predicts \(\chi (T) \sim \frac{{\mu }_{PM}^{2}}{(T-\theta)}\), where μPM is the paramagnetic moment, and θ is a measure of the inter-atomic moment coupling. For the latter case, Moriya’s theory of spin fluctuations47,48,49,50,51,52 predicts \(\chi (T) \sim \frac{I}{(T-{T}^{* })}\), where I is a measure of the intra-atomic coupling. In Ti3Cu4, the slope and intercept of the linear fit to H/ΔM between 50 and 300 K (solid line, Fig. 1c) yield a paramagnetic moment μPM = 1.0 μB per F.U. and T* = 19.4 K, respectively, where T* is analogous to the Weiss temperature in local moment systems. The positive T* is consistent with ferromagnetic in-plane interactions characteristic of the Γ9 magnetic structure, where the c direction coupling is AFM.
While the linear inverse susceptibility alone is not enough to indicate itinerant moments in Ti3Cu4, the paramagnetic moment μPM is too small to be explained by a local moment scenario, in which the smallest possible unscreened moment would be 1.73 μB per F.U. corresponding to S = 1/2 at the Ti2 site (all other sites in this structure have higher multiplicities and would therefore produce even larger magnetic moments per F.U.).
The magnetic entropy Smag (estimated from the grey area under the Cp/T peak in Fig. 1e) falls in line with the same conclusion: Smag (thin line, right axis in Fig. 1e) reaches only ~1% R ln 2 up to 16 K (above TN). Such a small entropy release is consistent with small moment ordering, likely even smaller than that in the itinerant antiferromagnet TiAu37 where Smag was close to 3% \(R\ln 2\). This indicates that the paramagnetic moment in Ti3Cu4 is best explained as originating from itinerant spin fluctuations, a scenario corroborated below by our ab initio calculations in the Electronic structure subsection.
Another empirical signature of itinerant moment magnetism is a divergent Rhodes-Wohlfarth ratio qc/qs > > 1, where qc and qs correspond to the number of magnetic carriers above and below the ordering temperature53. Experimentally, qc is extracted from the paramagnetic moment μPM determined from high temperature fits of the inverse magnetic susceptibility:
and qs is determined from the low temperature (ordered) moment μord
The Rhodes-Wohlfarth ratio qc/qs close to unity corresponds to the local moment scenario, while an increase in qc/qs with lower ordering temperature indicates an increased degree of itinerancy53. Magnetization measurements M(H) for Ti3Cu4 (Fig. 4) point to a small μ7T ~ 0.25μB, while single crystal neutron measurements indicate that the ordered moment μord is even smaller, 0.17(5)μB. These values result in a large qc/qs ≈ 2.4, reinforcing the itinerant magnetism picture in Ti3Cu4.
Electronic structure
In order to glean insight into the nature of the magnetic order, and in particular the small value of the ordered moment, we performed first principles calculations based on DFT. The calculations reveal a Fermi surface consisting of four sheets centered around the Γ point, and a small pocket around the X point (Fig. 5a–c). The analysis of the orbital-projected band structure (so-called “fat bands”) in Fig. 5d shows that the main contribution to the nested Fermi surface sheet in Fig. 5a comes from the \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) orbital on the Ti2 atom, whereas the partial contributions from the other orbitals and from Ti1 atoms are much smaller, as demonstrated by the projected density of states (DOS) in Fig. 5e. The reason for this orbital selectivity appears to be connected to the square net geometry of the Ti2 layer, where the \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) orbital lies along the Ti2-Ti2 bonds, reminiscent of the cuprates54.
The calculations performed in the magnetically ordered phase, with the experimentally determined wavevector k = (001) show that the DOS gets depleted around the chemical potential (Fig. 5f), and that the sharp DOS peak present in the PM phase (Fig. 5e) is split into two peaks separated by about 0.5 eV, with a pseudogap in between. This peak separation, due to the internal staggered magnetic field, is quantitatively consistent with the DFT-predicted ordered moment of 0.25 μB per Ti2 ion. Interestingly, the calculations show zero ordered moment on the buckled Ti1 layer. The reason is that the center of mass of the Ti1 \({d}_{{x}^{2}-{y}^{2}}\) band lies far below the Fermi level (close to −1 eV) due to greater hybridization with the dxz and dyz orbitals within the buckled layer, thus unable to participate in the formation of the magnetic order on the Ti1 sites.
The above analysis, combined with the smallness of the magnetic moment on the Ti2 ion, clearly indicates the itinerant nature of the magnetism in Ti3Cu4. Of note, the Fermi sheets in Fig. 5a–c appear to be nested, suggesting that an SDW order is likely to be realized with wavevectors along either k1∥(100) (brown arrow in panel a) or k2∥(110) (blue arrow). However, the neutron diffraction instead shows an out-of-plane wavevector k = (001). In order to elucidate this puzzling behaviour, we performed a series of ab initio calculations with various ordering wavevectors detailed in Supplementary Note 3. Supplementary Fig. 6 shows that the candidate SDW states with various commensurate wavevectors along (100) and (110) are all higher in energy than that of the experimentally observed k = (001) state, with one notable exception: the noncollinear \((\frac{1}{8}\,0\,0)\) state is predicted to lie slightly (about 1 meV per F.U.) lower in energy. This energy difference is however within the error bars of the DFT calculation and is therefore not significant. We conclude that the nested nature of the Fermi surfaces allows for several candidate SDW states very close in energy. We therefore rely on the neutron diffraction study to deduce the ordered state with the wavevector k = (001).
Continuous suppression of the Néel temperature by magnetic field
We return to the field-induced transition in Ti3Cu4. Increasing magnetic field continuously suppresses TN as seen in M(H), M(T)/H, Cp, and ρ(T) measurements for both H∥ab and H∥c. A field Hc ~ 4.87 T suppresses the magnetic order all the way to zero temperature, as shown in the T − H phase diagram in Fig. 6 (details of the determination of the phase boundary can be found in Supplementary Note 2), raising the possibility of a field-induced QCP in Ti3Cu4. Down to 0.5 K, the transition is continuous, with no apparent hysteresis. The log-log T − H plot around HC is linear (inset, Fig. 6), such that the phase boundary in the vicinity of HC can be described by an exponential behavior T\(\propto {\left|H-{H}_{C}\right|}^{\delta }\), with HC = 4.87 ± 0.005 and δ = 2/3. This corresponds to the expected Hertz-Millis exponent for a 3D AFM6,29,30 or Bose-Einstein condensation of magnons55,56,57.
Divergence of the magnetic Grüneisen ratio
Thermodynamic measurements provide convincing evidence of field-induced quantum criticality27,58,59. We therefore turn to the magnetic Grüneisen ratio ΓH defined as60
which measures the slope of the isentropes of the magnetic phase boundary in the T − H plane61. Across a classical phase transition, ΓH is expected to be finite and temperature-independent60. Near a QCP, an entropy ridge is expected to form where the system is maximally undecided between the ordered state and the disordered state (for dH > 0, \({\left(\partial S/\partial H\right)}_{T}\, > \,0\) when H < Hc and \({\left(\partial S/\partial H\right)}_{T}\, < \,0\) when H > Hc), which is reflected by a sign change of ΓH at the QCP61. Furthermore, in the low-temperature limit, the singularities in S and T cancel out in Eq. (4), leaving only singularities associated with H60. Zhu et al. showed that ΓH scales as \(\frac{1}{H-{H}_{c}}\) as T → 0 and \({{{\Gamma }}}_{H} \sim \frac{1}{{T}^{1/\nu z}}\) at H = Hc60. Here ν is the exponent of the correlation length and z is the dynamical critical exponent. Together, the sign change of ΓH at Hc and the scaling relations are definitive proof of a field induced QCP60,61,62.
We obtain ΓH by measuring the magneto-caloric effect (MCE) (∂T/∂H) under quasi-adiabatic conditions (S ~ constant for a duration smaller than it takes for the thermometer to relax). In Fig. 7a, we plot MCE, i.e. the temperature change driven by ramping the magnetic field H across HC from 3.5 T to 5.5 T at various bath temperatures 0.25 K < TB < 1.00 K for H∥c. Upon increasing H from below Hc, T decreases, such that ∂T/∂H < 0. Since CH is a positive quantity, the sign of ∂T/∂H is always opposite to the sign of ∂S/∂H. Consequently, the decrease in T during the field upsweep indicates an increase in magnetic entropy (∂S/∂H > 0). Near HC, there is a sudden increase in T, indicating a sudden reduction of the magnetic entropy. Subsequently, T decreases again due to the measurement apparatus relaxing back to TB. To confirm that the decrease in T above HC is indeed related to the measurement apparatus relaxation and not intrinsic to the sample, we measured the MCE sweeping H down from 5.5 T to 3.5 T (Fig. 7b, dashed line). Upon decreasing H above HC, T decreases indicating an increase in magnetic entropy as the QCP is approached. The sudden increase in T reflects a decrease in magnetic entropy as H crosses Hc. Upon further decreasing H, the temperature again relaxes towards TB before increasing due to a reduction of magnetic entropy as the distance from Hc is increased.
Figure 7c shows ΓH(H) at selected TB, approximated as \({{{\Gamma }}}_{H}\,\approx \,\frac{1}{{T}_{B}}\frac{{{\Delta }}T}{{{\Delta }}H}\). Though we cannot reliably extract the exponents due to the quasi-adiabatic nature of our experiments, as T → 0 it is apparent that ΓH diverges as \({(H-{H}_{c})}^{-1}\), as illustrated by the pink solid line. Furthermore, ΓH(T) (Fig. 7d) switches signs across HC and diverges as T−b (black solid line) for H = HC. While the quasi-adiabiatic conditions render the exponents’ determination uncertain, the MCE power law divergence is unambiguous: assuming constant heat loss, the exponent may vary, but such a scenario cannot cause a divergence. For a classical phase transition, the Grüneisen ratio is a constant, and therefore the divergence must come from the QCP.
Together, the sign change of ΓH across HC and the divergences at ΓH(H, T → 0) and ΓH(H = HC, T) provide ample evidence for a field induced QCP at HC = 4.87 T60,61.
Non-fermi liquid to Fermi liquid crossover
Now turning to the electrical transport, we note that QCPs are often (albeit not always) accompanied by non-Fermi liquid (NFL) behavior, with a NFL-FL crossover convergent at the QCP. Signatures of the NFL behavior are revealed by the resistivity analysis ρ = ρ0 + AnTn, where the T − H dependence of the exponent n is represented by the contour plot in Fig. 6 for H∥c. A subset of the ρ(T) data and fits to ρ = ρ0 + AnTn can be found in Supplementary Fig. 7. At high temperatures in the paramagnetic state, ρ(T) varies sub-linearly with temperature, i.e., n < 1. In other itinerant systems, similar behavior has been attributed to the conduction electrons being scattered by spin fluctuations of the d-band electrons63,64. Just below TN, n → 1 before crossing over to n → 2 at the lowest measured T, for H → 0. Above the QCP (H > HC) as the temperature is lowered (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 7), n crosses over to n ≈ 1 at intermediate temperatures, and to 2 on further cooling, signaling a FL regime at the lowest temperatures. Resitivity measured down to T = 50 mK for H ≥ Hc, shown in Fig. 8a as ρ(T) and in Fig. 8b–d as ρ vs. Tn, demonstrate unambiguously a crossover from NFL (n < 2) to FL behavior (n = 2) as H moves away from Hc. Closest to Hc (Fig. 8b), the exponent n = 1.3 is registered over nearly two decades in T from 50 mK to ~3 K. Similarly, NFL (n = 1.7, Fig. 8c) or FL (n = 2, Fig. 8d) behavior occurs over two decades in temperature as the field increases up to 10 T.
Beyond transport, thermodynamic measurements reinforce the NFL behavior with the divergence of the low T specific heat (Fig. 8e). For metals, at low T, the electronic contribution to the specific heat is expected to dominate and the temperature dependence varies as Tm, where m = 1 for a FL, and m > 1 is often associated with NFL behavior due to quantum fluctuations6,7. Figure 8e shows Cp/T plotted on a semi-log scale for 0.3 K ≤ T ≤ 1.5 K at various fields 0 ≤ H ≤ 8 T. For H = 0, the data plateau towards the lowest temperature T = 0.3 K, as expected for a FL. A power-law divergence (m > 1) develops at H = 4.5 T and persists beyond Hc up to H = 8 T, with the steepest divergence close to Hc (black squares). Supplementary Fig. 8 shows evidence for a Schottky anomaly at the lowest temperatures. Cp/T increases on cooling starting at higher T as H is increased. However, for temperatures beyond those where the Schottky contribution is largest (T > 0.3 K, Fig. 8e), the specific heat does not follow the trend expected from Schottky anomaly (no increase in T as H increases). The divergence in Cp/T is therefore ascribed to NFL behavior, consistent with the transport measurements.
Discussion
Ti3Cu4 is an itinerant antiferromagnet for which the ordering temperature can be suppressed towards T = 0 with a modest field, resulting in a field induced QCP. This is therefore not only an example of an itinerant magnet with no magnetic elements, one of very few known to date, but also the first known (to the best of our knowledge) such compound with a field-induced QCP. Typically, itinerant antiferromagnetism is associated with a strongly nested Fermi surface, where the nesting wavevector dictates the magnetic wavevector. Such a mechanism applies to the prototypical itinerant antiferromagnet or SDW system, elemental Cr42. While the calculated Fermi surface for Ti3Cu4 appears nested in the ab plane (Fig. 5a–c), the experimental propagation wavevector points in the out-of-plane direction (Fig. 3). An added conundrum is that the Fermi level lies on a sharp van-Hove singularity in the density of states (Fig. 5e), which is often associated with itinerant ferromagnetism. A similar scenario was found in TiAu37, and it was later established that a new mechanism of mirrored van-Hove singularities in the Fermi surface, separated by the experimentally determined magnetic wavevector, lie at the origin of the itinerant antiferromagnetism65,66. Further efforts are required to elucidate the origin of the magnetism in Ti3Cu4.
From a quantum criticality perspective, Ti3Cu4 represents a system without 4f electrons and is therefore free of the complication of f-d electron hybridization in the quantum critical regime. Since Fermi surface instabilities lie at the heart of itinerant magnetism, it is intuitive to understand how the effects of pressure or chemical doping may alter the Fermi surface, and in turn, the resulting magnetism or quantum criticality. However, it is less clear what the role of magnetic field is in tuning magnetism towards a QCP. Compared to f-electron systems, d-electron systems, have much larger energy scales associated with the magnetism which is reflected in their ordering temperatures (Tord): Tord ~0.1–5 K in the former, and 10–100’s of K in the latter. Ti3Cu4 (TN = 11.3 K) is unique in that the energy scale is seemingly small (a magnetic field of Hc = 4.87 T can completely suppress the magnetism) compared to TiAu (TN = 26 K)37 or Cr (TN = 311 K)42 where magnetic fields have little effect on the magnetic ordering temperature. Ti3Cu4 therefore provides a model platform to study the of role magnetic fields as a tuning parameter for itinerant magnetic quantum criticality. It will be specifically informative to compare and contrast future studies when either chemical doping or pressure are used as the non-thermal control parameter. For example, doping Cr with V suppresses the magnetic order ending in a QCP40,67, while Re and Ru68,69,70,71 suppress the magnetism resulting in a superconducting state which may be unconventional72.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Ti3Cu4 is an itinerant AFM with no magnetic elements: TN = 11.3 K and μord = 0.17μB per F.U. The magnetic state is remarkably fragile for a transition metal magnetic system, and can be suppressed to T = 0 with a small applied field HC = 4.87 T, resulting in a field-induced QCP. Measurements of the magnetic Grüneisen ratio provide strong evidence for the quantum criticality, reinforced by the accompanied NFL-FL crossover revealed by the resistivity and heat capacity measurements. Ti3Cu4 can serve as as a platform for comparison and potentially generalization of the quantum critical behavior over the entire spectrum of magnetic moments from local to itinerant. In future studies, it will be important to understand the effects of pressure, chemical substitution, and disorder in Ti3Cu4, all of which are currently underway.
Methods
Crystal growth
Ti3Cu4 was grown using a self flux method with a starting composition of Ti0.33Cu0.67. The constituent elements were arc melted and placed in a Ta crucible and sealed under partial argon pressure in a quartz ampoule. After the initial heating to 950∘C over 6 hours, a first step of fast cooling to 935 °C was followed by slow cooling to 895 °C over 62 hours, where the crystals were separated from the excess flux by spinning in a centrifuge.
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction data on a Ti3Cu4 crystal were collected at 100(2) K with the use of a Bruker APEX273 kappa diffractometer equipped with graphite-monochromized MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The data collection strategy was optimized with the use of the algorithm COSMO in the APEX2 package as a series of ω and ϕ scans. Scans of 0.5\({}^{\underline{{{{{{{{\rm{o}}}}}}}}}}\) at 6 s/frame were used. The detector to crystal distance was 40 mm. The collection of intensity data as well as cell refinement and data reduction were carried out with the use of the program APEX2. The structure of Ti3Cu4 was initially solved and refined with the use of the SHELX-14 algorithms of the SHELXTL program package74. Face indexed absorption, incident beam, and decay corrections of the substructure were performed with the use of the program SADABS75. The program STRUCTURE TIDY76 in PLATON77 was used to standardize the atomic positions of the substructure. Furthermore, powder diffraction was done using a Bruker x- ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. Powder and single crystal x-ray diffraction confirm the reported crystal structure for Ti3Cu443, apart from signs of mechanical stresses and possible minute (<5%) Ta inclusions (non-magnetic). However, these do not affect the results of the current study on the magnetic properties of Ti3Cu4.
Magnetization and resistivity measurements
DC magnetization measurements were performed in a Quantum Design (QD) magnetic property measurement system from T = 1.8 K–300 K. The same system was used with a helium 3 insert for measurements from T = 0.5 K–1.8 K. Magnetization measurements up to H = 30 T were carried out with an extraction magnetometer in a capacitor-powered pulsed magnet at the NHMFL pulsed field facility. The ac electrical resistivity measurements were made in a QD physical properties measurement system (PPMS) with a standard four-point probe technique for temperatures 2–300 K and magnetic field from 0–14 T. Measurements down to 50 mK were made in the same instrument equipped with a dilution refridgerator.
Magneto-caloric effect measurements
Quasi-adiabatic magneto-caloric effect (MCE) measurements between 0.25 K < T < 1 K were carried out in a QD PPMS equiped with a dilution refrigerator using the heat capacity option to ensure a quasi-adiabatic environment. The thermometer of a heat capacity puck with no sample mounted was calibrated as a function of field and temperature at several fields ranging from 0 < H < 14 T. From this procedure, a calibration map was extablished for the thermometer resistance R, temperature T, and magnetic field H. The sample was then mounted and cooled using the heat capacity option to ensure that the sample temperature was at equilibrium with the bath temperature. H was then swept at a rate of 105 Oe/s between 3.5 and 5.5 T and R of the heat capacity thermometer was measured. Using the calibration map, the measured R was converted to temperature, from which the MCE values were derived.
Muon spin relaxation measurements
Muon spin relaxation (μSR) measurements were performed on a mosaic of single crystals at the M20 surface muon channel at TRIUMF. The crystals were mounted on a low background sample holder with aluminum backed Mylar tape with their crystallographic c-axis parallel to the incident muon beam. Measurements were performed in the LAMPF spectrometer between 2 and 20 K in both longitudinal field geometry and in a weak (H = 30 G) transverse field. In this experiment, the total initial asymmetry, A0, was determined by fitting the asymmetry spectra at high temperatures, in the weakly relaxing paramagnetic regime, giving A0 = 0.220. Here we present the normalized muon polarization, P(t) = A(t)/A0. Measurements were collected with the muon spins parallel to their momentum, such that the muons are implanted with their spins pointing along the c-axis, and also in spin-rotated mode, such that the muons are implanted with their spins lying within the crystals’ ab-plane. No significant anisotropy was detected. The muon decay asymmetry spectra were fitted with a least squares minimization protocol using the muSRfit software package.
Elastic neutron scattering measurements
Single crystal elastic neutron scattering measurements were performed on the Ei = 14.5 meV fixed-incident energy triple axis spectrometer HB-1A at the High Flux Isotope Reactor, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. This experiment was performed with standard collimation settings (40’ − 40’ − 40’ − 80’), and the energy resolution at the elastic line was ~1 meV (full-width half-maximum). Adhesive was used to attach a 70 mg single crystal of Ti3Cu4 onto an aluminum plate. Measurements were performed in both the (hk0) and the (h0l) scattering planes. The crystal was oriented prior to the experiment at the CG-1B neutron alignment station. Measurements were performed at temperatures between 5 K and 20 K using a closed-cycle refrigerator. The magnetic symmetry analysis was performed with SARAh78 and Rietveld refinements were carried out using FullProf79.
Density functional theory calculations
We performed Density Functional Theory (DFT) based calculations using the full-potential WIEN2K80 and pseudo-potential ABINIT81 packages, with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) used to account for the exchange-correlation interactions82. The band structure, density of states and Fermi surfaces were computed with the full-potential WIEN2K code, whereas ABINIT was used to perform large supercell calculations to accommodate various spin-density wave (SDW) orders. We ensured that both codes produced similar results at the level of the primitive unit cell. The polyhedron integration method was used to calculate the electronic density of states (DOS).
Data availability
The crystallographic file in CIF format for the refined structure has been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as CCDC 1968322. These data may be obtained free of charge by contacting CCDC at (https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/). All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Johnston, D. C. The puzzle of high temperature superconductivity in layered iron pnictides and chalcogenides. Advances in Physics 59, 803–1061 (2010).
Keimer, B., Kivelson, S. A., Norman, M. R., Uchida, S. & Zaanen, J. From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides. Nature 518, 179 (2015).
Dai, P., Hu, J. & Dagotto, E. Magnetism and its microscopic origin in iron-based high-temperature superconductors. Nature Physics 8, 709 (2012).
Dai, P. Antiferromagnetic order and spin dynamics in iron-based superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 87, 855 (2015).
Julian, S. et al. Non-fermi-liquid behaviour in magnetic d-and f-electron systems. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 177, 265–270 (1998).
Stewart, G. Non-fermi-liquid behavior in d-and f-electron metals. Reviews of Modern Physics 73, 797 (2001).
Löhneysen, H.V., Rosch, A., Vojta, M. & Wölfle, P. Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions. Reviews of Modern Physics 79, 1015 (2007).
Coleman, P., Pépin, C., Si, Q. & Ramazashvili, R. How do fermi liquids get heavy and die? Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 13, R723 (2001).
Schröder, A. et al. Onset of antiferromagnetism in heavy-fermion metals. Nature 407, 351–355 (2000).
Custers, J. et al. The break-up of heavy electrons at a quantum critical point. Nature 424, 524–527 (2003).
Gegenwart, P., Si, Q. & Steglich, F. Quantum criticality in heavy-fermion metals. Nature Physics 4, 186 (2008).
Heuser, K., Scheidt, E.-W., Schreiner, T. & Stewart, G. R. Inducement of non-fermi-liquid behavior with a magnetic field. Physical Review B 57, R4198 (1998).
Gegenwart, P. et al. Magnetic-field induced quantum critical point in YbRh2Si2. Physical Review Letters 89, 056402 (2002).
Gegenwart, P. et al. High-field phase diagram of the heavy-fermion metal YbRh2Si2. New Journal of Physics 8, 171 (2006).
Gegenwart, P. et al. Unconventional quantum criticality in YbRh2Si2. Physica B: Condensed Matter 403, 1184–1188 (2008).
Tokiwa, Y., Garst, M., Gegenwart, P., Bud’ko, S. L. & Canfield, P. C. Quantum bicriticality in the heavy-fermion metamagnet YbAgGe. Physical Review Letters 111, 116401 (2013).
Zhao, H. et al. Quantum-critical phase from frustrated magnetism in a strongly correlated metal. Nature Physics 15, 1261–1266 (2019).
Paglione, J. et al. Field-induced quantum critical point in CeCoIn5. Physical Review Letters 91, 246405 (2003).
Balicas, L. et al. Magnetic field-tuned quantum critical point in CeAuSb2. Physical Review B 72, 064422 (2005).
Morosan, E., Bud’ko, S., Mozharivskyj, Y. & Canfield, P. Magnetic-field-induced quantum critical point in YbPtIn and YbPt0.98 in single crystals. Physical Review B 73, 174432 (2006).
Das, D., Gnida, D., Wiśniewski, P. & Kaczorowski, D. Magnetic field-driven quantum criticality in antiferromagnetic CePtIn4. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 20333–20338 (2019).
Zapf, V., Jaime, M. & Batista, C. Bose-einstein condensation in quantum magnets. Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 563 (2014).
Daou, R., Bergemann, C. & Julian, S. Continuous evolution of the fermi surface of CeRu2Si2 across the metamagnetic transition. Physical Review Letters 96, 026401 (2006).
Aoki, D. et al. Ferromagnetic quantum critical endpoint in UCoAl. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 80, 094711 (2011).
Tokiwa, Y., Mchalwat, M., Perry, R. & Gegenwart, P. Multiple metamagnetic quantum criticality in Sr3Ru2O7. Physical Review Letters 116, 226402 (2016).
Grigera, S. et al. Angular dependence of the magnetic susceptibility in the itinerant metamagnet Sr3Ru2O7. Physical Review B 67, 214427 (2003).
Rost, A., Perry, R., Mercure, J.-F., Mackenzie, A. & Grigera, S. Entropy landscape of phase formation associated with quantum criticality in Sr3Ru2O7. Science 325, 1360–1363 (2009).
A., G. S. et al. Magnetic field-tuned quantum criticality in the metallic ruthenate Sr3Ru2O7. Science 294, 329 (2001).
Hertz, J. A. Quantum critical phenomena. Physical Review B 14, 1165 (1976).
Millis, A. Effect of a nonzero temperature on quantum critical points in itinerant fermion systems. Physical Review B 48, 7183 (1993).
Millis, A., Schofield, A., Lonzarich, G. & Grigera, S. Metamagnetic quantum criticality in metals. Physical review letters 88, 217204 (2002).
Belitz, D. & Kirkpatrick, T. Quantum triple point and quantum critical end points in metallic magnets. Physical review letters 119, 267202 (2017).
Matthias, B. & Bozorth, R. Ferromagnetism of a zirconium-zinc compound. Physical Review 109, 604 (1958).
Sokolov, D., Aronson, M., Gannon, W. & Fisk, Z. Critical phenomena and the quantum critical point of ferromagnetic Zr1−xNbxZn2. Physical Review Letters 96, 116404 (2006).
Matthias, B., Clogston, A., Williams, H., Corenzwit, E. & Sherwood, R. Ferromagnetism in solid solutions of scandium and indium. Physical Review Letters 7, 7 (1961).
Svanidze, E. et al. Non-fermi liquid behavior close to a quantum critical point in a ferromagnetic state without local moments. Physical Review X 5, 011026 (2015).
Svanidze, E. et al. An itinerant antiferromagnetic metal without magnetic constituents. Nature Communications 6, 7701 (2015).
Svanidze, E. et al. Quantum critical point in the Sc-doped itinerant antiferromagnet TiAu. Physical Review B 95, 220405 (2017).
Yeh, A. et al. Quantum phase transition in a common metal. Nature 419, 459–462 (2002).
Jaramillo, R. et al. Breakdown of the bardeen–cooper–schrieffer ground state at a quantum phase transition. Nature 459, 405–409 (2009).
Jaramillo, R., Feng, Y., Wang, J. & Rosenbaum, T. Signatures of quantum criticality in pure cr at high pressure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 13631–13635 (2010).
Fawcett, E. Spin-density-wave antiferromagnetism in chromium. Reviews of Modern Physics 60, 209 (1988).
Schubert, K., Meissner, H. & Rossteutscher, W. Einige strukturdaten metallischer phasen (11). Naturwissenschaften 51, 507–507 (1964).
Fisher, M. E. Relation between the specific heat and susceptibility of an antiferromagnet. Philosophical Magazine 7, 1731–1743 (1962).
Fisher, M. E. & Langer, J. Resistive anomalies at magnetic critical points. Physical Review Letters 20, 665 (1968).
Hayano, R. et al. Zero-and low-field spin relaxation studied by positive muons. Physical Review B 20, 850 (1979).
Moriya, T. & Kawabata, A. Effect of spin fluctuations on itinerant electron ferromagnetism. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 34, 639–651 (1973).
Hasegawa, H. & Moriya, T. Effect of spin fluctuations on itinerant electron antiferromagnetism. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 36, 1542–1553 (1974).
Takahashi, Y. & Moriya, T. Quantitative aspects of the theory of weak itinerant ferromagnetism. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 54, 1592–1598 (1985).
Nakayama, K. & Moriya, T. Quantitative aspects of the theory of weak itinerant antiferromagnetism. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 56, 2918–2926 (1987).
Konno, R. & Moriya, T. Quantitative aspects of the theory of nearly ferromagnetic metals. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 56, 3270–3278 (1987).
Moriya, T. Spin fluctuations in ferromagnetic metals–temperature variation of local moment and short range order. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 51, 420–434 (1981).
Rhodes, P. & Wohlfarth, E. P. The effective curie-weiss constant of ferromagnetic metals and alloys. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 273, 247–258 (1963).
Comin, R. & Damascelli, A. Resonant x-ray scattering studies of charge order in cuprates. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 7, 369–405 (2016).
Giamarchi, T. & Tsvelik, A. Coupled ladders in a magnetic field. Physical Review B 59, 11398 (1999).
Nikuni, T., Oshikawa, M., Oosawa, A. & Tanaka, H. Bose-Einstein condensation of dilute magnons in TlCuCl3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5868–5871 (2000).
Nohadani, O., Wessel, S., Normand, B. & Haas, S. Universal scaling at field-induced magnetic phase transitions. Physical Review B 69, 220402 (2004).
Gen, M. et al. Magnetocaloric effect and spin-strain coupling in the spin-nematic state of LiCuVO4. Physical Review Research 1, 033065 (2019).
Tokiwa, Y., Radu, T., Geibel, C., Steglich, F. & Gegenwart, P. Divergence of the magnetic grüneisen ratio at the field-induced quantum critical point in YbRh2Si2. Physical review letters 102, 066401 (2009).
Zhu, L., Garst, M., Rosch, A. & Si, Q. Universally diverging grüneisen parameter and the magnetocaloric effect close to quantum critical points. Physical Review Letters 91, 066404 (2003).
Garst, M. & Rosch, A. Sign change of the grüneisen parameter and magnetocaloric effect near quantum critical points. Physical Review B 72, 205129 (2005).
Gegenwart, P. Grüneisen parameter studies on heavy fermion quantum criticality. Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 114502 (2016).
Ueda, K. Electrical resistivity of antiferromagnetic metals. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 43, 1497–1508 (1977).
Cao, G., Song, W., Sun, Y. & Lin, X. Violation of the Mott–Ioffe–Regel limit: high-temperature resistivity of itinerant magnets Srn+1RunO3n + 1 (n = 2, 3, ∞) and CaRuO3. Solid State Communications 131, 331–336 (2004).
Goh, W. F. & Pickett, W. E. A mechanism for weak itinerant antiferromagnetism: Mirrored van hove singularities. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 116, 27004 (2016).
Goh, W. F. & Pickett, W. E. Competing magnetic instabilities in the weak itinerant antiferromagnetic TiAu. Physical Review B 95, 205124 (2017).
Lee, M., Husmann, A., Rosenbaum, T. & Aeppli, G. High resolution study of magnetic ordering at absolute zero. Physical review letters 92, 187201 (2004).
Nishihara, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Tokumoto, M., Takeda, K. & Fukamichi, K. Superconductivity and magnetism of bcc Cr-Ru alloys. Physical Review B 34, 3446 (1986).
Chatani, K. & Endoh, Y. Competition of antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in Cr-Ru alloys. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 72, 17–20 (2003).
Matthias, B., Geballe, T., Compton, V., Corenzwit, E. & Hull Jr, G. Superconductivity of chromium alloys. Physical Review 128, 588 (1962).
Nishihara, Y., Yamaguchi, Y., Kohara, T. & Tokumoto, M. Itinerant-electron antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in bcc Cr-Ru alloys. Physical Review B 31, 5775 (1985).
Ramazanoglu, M. et al. Suppression of antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations in superconducting Cr 0.8 Ru 0.2. Physical Review B 98, 134512 (2018).
Bruker, A. V. 1 and saint version 7.34 a data collection and processing software, bruker analytical x-ray instruments. Inc., Madison, WI, USA (2009).
Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of shelx. Acta Crystallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography 64, 112–122 (2008).
SADABS, G. S. Department of structural chemistry. University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany (2008).
Gelato, L. & Parthé, E. Structure tidy–a computer program to standardize crystal structure data. Journal of Applied Crystallography 20, 139–143 (1987).
Spek, A. Platon, a multipurpose crystallographic tool. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands (2014).
Wills, A. A new protocol for the determination of magnetic structures using simulated annealing and representational analysis (sarah). Physica B: Condensed Matter 276, 680–681 (2000).
Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Physica B 192, 55–69 (1993).
Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. Wien2k: An augmented plane wave plus local orbitals program for calculating crystal properties. Technische Universität Wien, Wien 28 (2001).
Gonze, X. et al. First-principles computation of material properties: the ABINIT software project. Computational Materials Science 25, 478–492 (2002).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Bassam Hitti and Gerald Morris for their assistance with the muon spin relaxation measurements at TRIUMF. We are also grateful to Anand B. Puthirath for help with some characterization, as well as Warren Pickett and Jeffrey Lynn for useful conversations. We thank Ian Fisher and Pierre Massat for fruitful discussions on MCE measurements. JMM was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE 1842494. CLH, SL and EM acknowledge support from NSF DMR 1903741. CLH is also supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan under grant no. MOST 109-2112-M-006-026-MY3 and 110-2124-M-006-009. AMH, JB, YC, and GML were supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. VL and AHN were supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation grant C-1818. AHN was also supported by the National Science Foundation grant no. DMR-1917511 and would like to thank for the hospitality of the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. NSF PHY-1748958. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, which is supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1644779, the State of Florida and the United States Department of Energy. Use was made of the Integrated Molecular Structure Education and Research Center X-ray Facility at Northwestern University, which has received support from the Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental Resource (NSF Grant ECCS-1542205), the State of Illinois, and the International Institute for Nanotechnology. At Argonne, this work was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division (structural analysis). A portion of this research used resources at the High Flux Isotope Reactor, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.M. designed the study. J.M.M. and K.B. grew the crystals. J.M.M. performed magnetization, transport, heat capacity, and magneto-caloric effect measurements. J.M.M., A.M.H., C.L.H., S.L. and E.M. performed the analysis and wrote the manuscript with contributions from all authors. V.L. and A.H.N. performed DFT calculations and analysis. A.M.H., J.B., Y. C. and G.M.L. performed muon spin relaxation measurements and data analysis. A.A.A, L.L.K., and A.M.H. performed elastic neutron scattering measurements and analysis. C.D.M and M.G.K were responsible for the structural characterization. F.W. measured the high field magnetization data.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Physics thanks Peijie Sun and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moya, J.M., Hallas, A.M., Loganathan, V. et al. Field-induced quantum critical point in the itinerant antiferromagnet Ti3Cu4. Commun Phys 5, 136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00901-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-022-00901-7
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Quantum simulation of an extended Dicke model with a magnetic solid
Communications Materials (2024)