Abstract
T helper 17 (Th17) cells develop in response to T cell receptor signals (TCR) in the presence of specific environments, and produce the inflammatory cytokine IL17A. These cells have been implicated in a number of inflammatory diseases and represent a potential target for ameliorating such diseases. The kinase ITK, a critical regulator of TCR signals, has been shown to be required for the development of Th17 cells. However, we show here that lung inflammation induced by Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula (SR) induced Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (SR-HP) results in a neutrophil independent, and ITK independent Th17 responses, although ITK signals are required for γδ T cell production of IL17A. Transcriptomic analysis of resultant ITK independent Th17 cells suggest that the SR-HP-induced extrinsic inflammatory signals may override intrinsic T cell signals downstream of ITK to rescue Th17 responses in the absence of ITK. These findings suggest that the ability to pharmaceutically target ITK to suppress Th17 responses may be dependent on the type of inflammation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The CD4+ effector Th17 cells play important roles in the immune response to infection at mucosal surfaces. They have also been implicated in the development of a number of diseases including asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Th17 cells express the transcription factor RAR–related Orphan Receptor gamma T (RORγt) and secrete the inflammatory cytokine IL17 among other cytokines (IL17A, IL17F, IL21, and IL228). Th17 cells differentiate following activation by the TCR in the presence of cytokines such as IL6 and TGFβ8, or IL21 and TGFβ9. Although the signaling pathways downstream of the TCR that drives the development of Th17 cells remain unclear, we and others have shown that the TCR-activated tyrosine kinase ITK is critical. ITK plays an important role as an amplifier of the TCR signals, and in humans, and/or mouse models, has been shown to regulate the development of both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells in the thymus, and influences the development of specific populations of γδ T cells, iNKT cells, and intestinal Innate Lymphoid Cell 2 populations10,11,12,13,14,15,16. In the periphery, the signals regulated by ITK are able to tune the development of CD8+ T cell memory cells17, as well as the differentiation of CD4+ effector T cells18,19,20,21,22,23. A specific role for ITK in the development of Th17 cells has been demonstrated in both mouse models24, and in human T cells11,25. This conclusion is supported by the finding that humans with mutations in ITK resulting in Itk deficiency have reduced proportions of Th17 cells11. A better understanding of the development and function of Th17 cells, including the role of the pharmaceutically tractable ITK in the process, would further the development of therapeutic options for inflammatory diseases driven by IL17.
HP, Farmer’s Lung, a type of HP, is caused by repeated inhalation of foreign emissions, dust, or residues in moldy hay, specifically the thermophilic bacteria Saccharopolyspora rectivirgula (SR)26,27,28. The development of SR-induced HP includes a prominent role for Th17 cytokine IL17A27,29,30. Here, we have used IL17A-GFP reporter mice to clearly define cellular sources of IL17A during the development of SR-HP and used these mice to determine the role of ITK in the development of Th17-driven SR-HP. We show that γδ and later CD4+ αβ T cells are the predominant sources of IL17A during SR-induced development of HP. Furthermore, contrary to previous reports, we find that neutrophils are not major producers of this cytokine in vivo in this disease, nor are they required for the development of Th17 response in the lung. In addition, we found that surprisingly, ITK is not required for the development and cytokine production of IL17A by Th17 cells in the SR-induced Th17-driven lung inflammation in HP. Transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility analysis revealed little difference between WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells, although inflammation-related genes were upregulated in the absence of ITK. These data suggest that ITK differentially regulates Th17 cytokine production dependent on the type of lung inflammation, and has implications for understanding T helper differentiation programs of T cell-driven inflammatory diseases.
Results
γδ and αβ T cells, not neutrophils, are the major producers of IL17A in the lung, and Tec family kinase ITK is required for γδ T cell, but not αβ T cell production of IL17A during the development of SR-HP
Previous groups have shown that SR induces a predominant IL17A response, which drives lung inflammation27,29,30, however, the source of IL17A in SR-HP remains unexamined. Our experiments confirmed this conclusion that SR exposure induces lung inflammation, accompanied by high levels of IL17A in the lungs of WT mice, with little change in IFNγ and IL4 (Fig. 1b). Analysis of lungs of WT mice during the development of SR-HP over a 3-week time course revealed accumulation of γδ, CD4+ and CD8+ αβ T cells, and neutrophils (Fig. 1a–f).
ITK has been shown to be required for the development of Th17 cells in humans and mice, including in a murine model of allergic asthma22,24. To determine the role of ITK in SR-HP, we analyzed the development of lung inflammation following exposure to SR in WT and Itk−/− mice. We found that unexpectedly, Itk−/− mice exhibited similar inflammation and immune cell infiltration as WT mice following exposure to SR (Fig. 1a–f, Supplementary Fig. 1a). Furthermore, like WT mice, lungs from Itk−/− mice had substantial levels of mRNA for IL17A, but not IFNγ, as a result of SR exposure, and no difference in expression of IL17F, IL4, and IL13 between WT and Itk−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c). Analysis of lungs during the development of SR-HP over a 3-week time course revealed that the absence of ITK did not affect the accumulation of γδ T cells, CD4+, CD8+, αβ T cells or neutrophils (Fig. 1c–f). Given the fact that SR-induced HP has been shown to be dependent on IL17A30, these data suggest that contrary to expectations, ITK may not be required to generate a Th17 mediated inflammatory response in the lung in response to SR exposure.
We next used IL17A-GFP reporter mice to determine the identity of cells producing IL17A during the development of SR-HP. The use of IL17A-GFP reporter mice allows the identification of IL17A producing cells in vivo during the development of disease without resorting to ex vivo stimulation to identify cells, which may misidentify IL17A producers in vivo. Fluorescence microscopic analysis of the lungs of WT IL17A-GFP mice revealed the presence of GFP+ cells following SR exposure (see Fig. 2a). Using such IL17A-GFP reporter mice, we analyzed the total number of IL17A+ cells by gating first on IL17A-GFP+ cells followed by an analysis of cell type in the lungs of WT IL17A-GFP mice (see Supplementary Fig. 2a for example of gating strategy). This numerical analysis revealed that the response in WT mice was dominated by IL17A producing αβ T cells (Fig. 2b).
Analysis of the lungs of SR exposed WT and Itk−/− IL17A-GFP mice for the proportion of IL17A producing cells (again, by gating first on IL17A-GFP+ cells followed by an analysis of cell type in the lungs of IL17A-GFP mice) revealed that a high proportion of γδ T cells produce this cytokine early in the response, followed by αβ T cells in WT mice (Fig. 2c). By contrast, we found that unlike the response in WT mice, which was initially dominated by the IL17A producing γδ T cells early in the response that subsided by 3 weeks, the response in Itk−/− mice was not, with lower production of IL17A by γδ T cells (Fig. 2c). These results suggest that ITK is critical for the ability of γδ T cells, but perhaps not CD4+ T cells, to produce IL17A. Simonian et al. have previously shown that while γδ T cells can contribute to IL17A during SR-induced HP, they are not required for the development of lung inflammation27. Indeed, the total number of WT γδ T cells producing IL17A was much lower than WT αβ T cells in the lung (see Fig. 2b). Furthermore, while there was a difference in the ability of Itk−/− γδ T cells to produce IL17A, this was not critical since mice lacking γδ T cells (TCRδ−/−) or both γδ T cells and ITK (TCRδ/Itk DKO) exhibited no difference in CD4+ T cell production of IL17A following exposure to SR for three weeks (Supplementary Fig. 3a). Thus, while ITK is required for the production of IL17A by γδ T cells, this is not required for the production of IL17A by CD4+ T cells in response to SR exposure. We confirmed that ITK plays a critical role in Th17 differentiation by differentiating sort purified naïve CD4+ WT and Itk−/− T cells in vitro under Th17 conditions, as we and others have previously reported (Supplementary Fig. 3d)11,22,23,24,31. Taken together, our data indicate that ITK is required for γδ T cells to produce IL17A during the development of the response to SR in the lung. However, contrary to expectations, ITK is not required to generate an IL17A/Th17 response in the lung in response to SR exposure.
We also found that neutrophils are not significant producers of IL17A (see Fig. 2b, c. Note that there is very little production of IL17A by these cells, and so the line is not detectable on the graph), nor are they required for the development of lung inflammation (Supplementary Fig. 4). Neutrophils are also not required for the presence of αβ T cells or IL17A producing cells, since depletion of neutrophils in WT mice during exposure to SR for two weeks did not affect recruitment of γδ T cells or αβ (including CD4+ or CD8+ αβ T cells) to the lung (Fig. 3a–c), or the proportion of CD4+ αβ T cells, or γδ T cells that produce IL17A in vivo to the lung (Fig. 3d–f). Interestingly, this increase in IL17A producing T cells were mainly compartmentalized in the lung, since similar increases in IL17A producing cells were not found in the spleen or lymph nodes of exposed mice (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c). Taken together, our data suggest that γδ T cells, followed by CD4+ αβ T cells are the dominant sources of endogenous IL17A in SR induced HP, and that neutrophils are not significant contributors, nor do they affect the ability of T cells to produce IL17A.
Enhanced TcR signaling in CD4+ T cells the absence of ITK during SR exposure
The surprising finding that the absence of ITK does not affect the ability of SR exposure to generate an IL17A/Th17 response suggests that there are signals received by these cells in vivo, that may overcome the defect observed in vitro or under other conditions in vivo. ITK regulates the strength of the signal from the TcR17,32, and so we evaluated whether Itk−/− T cells receive adequate TcR signals in vivo during exposure to SR by utilizing Nur77-GFP mice33. We first examined the strength of TcR signals received by Itk−/− T cells in vivo by examining Nurr77 expression in T cells from non-exposed mice. These experiments confirm that the absence of ITK results in reduced TcR signals in CD4+ T cells (WT 1.7-fold higher Nurr77-GFP expression compared to Itk−/−, Fig. 4a). Next, we examined the receipt of TcR signals in these T cells by inducing SR-HP in WT or Itk−/− Nur77-GFP mice. WT or Itk−/− Nur77-GFP mice were exposed intranasally to PBS or SR over the course of two weeks, and Nur77-GFP expression was determined in CD4+ T cells in the lungs. We found SR exposure led to significantly more Nur77-GFP expression in Itk−/− CD4+ T cells compared to WT CD4+ cells, suggesting that Itk−/− CD4+ T cells receive more TcR signal during SR exposure (Itk−/− 1.8-fold higher Nurr77-GFP expression compared to WT, Fig. 4b. Higher expression of endogenous Nurr77 in Itk−/− Th17 cells was confirmed by RNA-sequencing (Fig. 4c, see Fig. 5)). Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis of the expression of Rorγt expression in WT or Itk−/− Th17 cells isolated from lungs exposed to SR for 3 weeks showed no difference in expression of Rorγt (see Supplementary Fig. 5). These signals in vivo may enhance the ability of Itk−/− T cells to become Th17 cells under these conditions.
Transcriptome analysis of SR induced WT and Itk −/− Th17 cells
Our surprise finding that ITK is not required to generate an IL17A/Th17 response in the lung in response to SR exposure led us to explore the transcriptome of the resultant Th17 cells. To do this we sort purified lung Th17 cells from WT and Itk−/− IL17A-GFP/Foxp3-RFP mice that had been exposed to SR for 3 weeks (CD4+IL17A-GFP+/Foxp3-RFP−), and performed RNA sequencing for comparison of the transcriptome. Principal component analysis (PCA) indicated a clear difference between the two genotypes (Fig. 5a). Hierarchical clustering and heatmap analysis of genes highlighted the small differences between SR-induced WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells (Fig. 5b). Statistical analysis revealed that less than 2% of genes were significantly different; 197 were significantly upregulated and 172 were downregulated (an unpaired t-test [Itk−/−] vs. [WT] P ≦ 0.05 FC ≧ 2.0). Visualizing the genes that were significantly different using a volcano plot illustrated these differences (Fig. 5c). Panther pathway analysis34,35 of significantly enriched genes revealed that most of the genes that were differentially upregulated genes in the absence of ITK were genes involved in inflammation-mediated by chemokine and cytokine signaling. And most downregulated genes were related to FGF signaling pathway (Supplementary Fig. 6). Analysis of transcripts for Th17 associated transcription factors Rorc, Rora4, Stat3, Irf4, Nfat, Runx1, Hif1a, Batf, Junb, Smad, and cMaf revealed that only Junb expression was reduced in Itk−/− T cells (Fig. 5d). However, it was notable that transcripts for IL17A and IL17F were significantly decreased in Itk−/− Th17 cells compared to WT Th17 cells (Fig. 5e). These data suggest that in response to SR in vivo, there is a small percentage of genes that are differentially expressed between WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells, Itk−/− Th17 are able to develop, albeit with significantly reduced expression of IL17A.
We next used gene set enrichment assays (GSEA) to derive a better understanding of pathways in enriched in the whole transcriptome of Itk−/− Th17 cells. This analysis revealed genes involved in the IFNγ response, IL6/JAK/SAT3 signaling, PI3K/AKT/MTOR signaling, IFNα responses, and TGFβ signaling, along with those reduced by KRAS signaling (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Fig. 7) as significantly positively enriched in Itk−/− Th17 cells. By contrast, genes significantly negatively enriched included those regulated by E2F, MYC, MTORC1 signaling among others (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Fig. 7). This GSEA suggests that inflammatory signals in vivo may provide Itk−/− cells with signals to rescue the development of Th17 cells during exposure to SR to induce the production of IL17A.
We next analyzed genes that have been previously shown36 to be important for Th17 differentiation and function in an attempt to compare the SR-induced Th17 cells that develop in the WT and Itk−/− mice to these gene sets. We extracted Th17 associated gene sets from Ciofani et al.36 and compared them via PCA. Based on analysis of these select Th17 related genes, the results indicated that the Itk−/− Th17 cells exhibited a slightly different pattern compared to WT Th17 cells (Fig. 5g,h). Volcano plots show more Th17 related genes are significantly downregulated in Itk−/− Th17 cells (Il10, Lif, Plzp, Ccl20, Maff), with Sox5 the only Th17-related gene that is significantly upregulated Itk−/− Th17 cells (Fig. 5i). These data suggest that WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells that develop in response to SR are closely related with regard to canonical Th17 transcripts.
Th17 cells can be categorized as non-pathogenic or pathogenic, and we next analyzed the gene sets for genes involved in distinguishing these two types. We compared datasets representing the transcriptome of in vitro generated Th17 cells, i.e., WT naïve CD4+ T cells stimulated in the presence of TGFβ and IL6 (considered non-pathogenic), or stimulated in the presence of IL1β, IL6, and IL23 (considered pathogenic)37 with SR-induced WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells by PCA. We found that SR-induced in vivo generated WT or Itk−/− Th17 cells were more similar to each other, and less similar to the in vitro-generated WT Th17 cells regardless of their manner of generation and potential pathogenicity. This data suggests that SR in vivo-derived Th17 cells may differ from in vitro generated counterparts (Supplementary Fig. 8).
We have previously shown that the absence of ITK reduces the development of Th17 cells during the development of allergic asthma24. We, therefore, compared datasets of the transcriptomes of HDM-induced allergic airway inflammation induced Th17 cells with the SR-HP induced WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells. PCA of the transcriptomes of the three conditions revealed SR-HP-induced Th17 cells are dissimilar to HDM-induced Th17 cells (Supplementary Fig. 9). Interestingly, when we added IL1-β/IL6/IL23 and TGFβ/IL6 induced Th17 cells for comparison with our data set, HDM Th17 cells clustered separately. However, when compared to the Th17 related gene set, all Th17 samples clustered together with the exception of Th17 cells collected from PBS exposed mice (Supplementary Fig. 9). These data suggest that based on their transcriptomes different types of Th17 cells are fairly similar, but SR-induced Th17 cells can be distinguished based on their transcriptomes.
Chromatin accessibility of SR induced WT or Itk −/− Th17 cells
To further explore the ability of Itk−/− T cells to become Th17 cells in response to SR, we performed ATAC-Seq to examine the accessibility of the nuclear chromatin. Purified lung Th17 cells from WT and Itk−/− IL17A-GFP/Foxp3-RFP mice that had been exposed to SR for 3 weeks (CD4+IL17A-GFP+/Foxp3-RFP−) were collected and prepared for ATAC-Seq. We found 60 significantly different peaks (p = 1.43e−9). However, with the exception of Zbtb32 we did not find many differences that matched the differences observed by RNA sequencing. Peaks near Tnfrsf8 and Zbtb32 were significantly lower in Itk−/− Th17 cells (Fig. 6a), although notably, there was no difference in chromatin accessibility near canonical Th17 transcription factors and cytokines, including IL17A (Fig. 6b–d). Taken together, this analysis of the transcriptome and chromatin accessibility of WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells support the conclusion that SR induces inflammatory signals that are able to rescue the development of Th17 response in the absence of ITK, and although Itk−/− Th17 cells produce lower levels of transcripts for IL17A, this is sufficient to result in lung inflammation.
Discussion
Th17 cells play important roles in the immune response to infection at mucosal surfaces, as well as in the development of a number of diseases including asthma, HP, and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Although the signaling pathways downstream of the TCR that drives the development of Th17 cells remain unclear, we and others have shown that the TCR-activated tyrosine kinase ITK is critical for the development of these cells11,24,25. Here, however, in a mouse model of inflammatory lung disease HP dependent on IL17A, we find that despite its well-documented role in the differentiation of Th17 cells22,24, SR-induced inflammation renders Th17 differentiation independent of ITK. These findings have implications for understanding Th17 differentiation programs of IL17A-driven inflammatory diseases.
While CD4+ T cells are prominent producers of IL17A38, previous studies have suggested that while there are elevated levels of IL17A in the lung in SR-induced HP, there is a surprisingly small percentage of CD4+ Th17 cells in the lung, suggesting that IL17A may be produced by other sources as well27. γδ T cells are also a well-known source of IL17A in response to antigen and bacterial infection, and other studies have also shown that in B. subtilis and Pigeon Droppings Extract induced model of HP, IL17A concentration was significantly increased in the lung and Vγ6Vδ1 or Vγ4 γδ expressing T cells are the predominant population of IL17A producing cells39,40. Furthermore, neutrophils, which can regulate Th1 and Th17 responses41, have been reported to be the major producers of IL17A in SR-HP42. Thus while a variety of cell types have been reported to produce IL17A during SR-HP, the cellular source of IL17A is unclear. A better understanding of how this disease develops will lead to the development of better therapy since mechanisms involved in Th17 driving inflammatory lung disease are far less understood in comparison to the classic Th2 mediated asthma. In this work, we utilized mice able to express GFP when they express IL17A (IL17A-GFP mice). This method allows the determination of IL17A expression in vivo without resorting to ex vivo stimulation, which only displays the potential to express cytokine and can be misleading. Indeed, using ex vivo stimulation in a model of SR-induced HP, Hasan et al., previously reported that neutrophils have the potential to express IL17A during HP and proposed that neutrophils and not T cells are responsible for the increased IL17A42. However, our studies using the IL17A-GFP reporter indicate that a large number of αβ CD4+ T cells are responsible for this expression and that this was minimally observed in the neutrophil population. These findings support the use of such cytokine reporter mice to more accurately determine the dynamics of cytokine expression in vivo during disease. Hippler et al., have also recently utilized different IL17A reporter mice to show that neutrophils also do not produce IL17A during infection with Candida albicans43, suggesting that although neutrophils can be producers of IFNγ 44, they may not be significant IL17A producers. αβ T cells are recognized as important mediators of pathology in HP, and IL17A has been established as the predominant cytokine in SR-induced HP27,28,30. Our results establish that CD4+ αβ T cells are the major producers of this IL17A, suggesting that SR-HP develops due to a predominant Th17 response driven by IL17A from CD4+ αβ T cells. This IL17A may then recruit neutrophils to the lung to contribute to the disease, but these neutrophils contribute little if any IL17A to the process.
We observed that the proportion and number of γδ T cells increase over the course of SR-HP inflammation and that the loss of ITK signaling leads to a decrease in the proportion and number of these T cells in the lung earlier in the disease, which later recovers to levels comparable to WT. This finding would suggest that ITK plays an important role in the early production of IL17A by conventional γδ T cells during the development of SR-HP. Regardless, based on the numbers of IL17A producing T cells, γδ T cells make a minor contribution compared to CD4+ αβ T cells.
We and others have documented a significant role for ITK in the differentiation of Th17 cells, including in response to multiple cytokines, including IL6/TGFβ, IL21/TGFβ, IL1/IL6, IL1/TGFβ, and IL6/IL23/ TGFβ22,24. We therefore initially predicted that the absence of ITK would lead to a reduction in response in SR-induced HP. However, this was not the case, since the absence of ITK did not lead to any alteration in inflammation in the lung tissue, recruitment of αβ or γδ T cells to the lung (although delayed in the case of γδ T cells). Importantly there was no effect on the ability of CD4+ αβ T cells to produce IL17A.
Analysis of receipt of TcR signals downstream of ITK using Nurr77-GFP reporter mice suggests that Itk−/− T cells receive strong signals during SR exposure which may rescue Th17 development. Indeed, transcriptomic analysis of SR induced WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells by GSEA revealed that these cells are very similar, however, there was enhanced expression of genes involved in inflammation and in metabolism in Itk−/− Th17 cells. Metabolic pathways downstream of ITK, such as mTOR signaling regulate T cell lineage commitment and functions. Both mTORC1 and mTORC2 are needed for Th17 cell differentiation and their production of IL17A is positively regulated by mTORC145,46. Furthermore, Th17 cells require fatty acid synthesis47,48, and so the reduced expression of genes involved in fatty acid metabolism in the absence of ITK may allow these cells more access to these critical nutrients for their differentiation and function. These data suggest there is a small set of genes and pathways that positively regulate Th17 cells concurrent with metabolic changes that may rescue ITK signaling, although transcripts of Il17a were significantly reduced in the Itk−/− Th17 cells. Interestingly, Gaublomme et al., reported that Gpr65, Plzp, Toso, and Cd5l are identifiers of Th17 pathogenicity, yet we found that only Plzp was significantly downregulated in Itk−/− Th17 cells. Chromatin accessibility analysis by ATAC-Seq also revealed high similarity between WT and Itk−/− Th17 cells including in canonical Th17 genes.
The finding that Th17 cells develop in SR exposed mice in the absence of ITK supports the view of plasticity of Th17 cells that is dependent on their environment49. Indeed, the difference in the transcriptomes of Th17 cells from HDM exposed mice and SR exposed mice is also likely explained by this. Given our previous work indicates that ITK is required for the development of Th17 cells in vitro, and in an ovalbumin-induced model of allergic asthma24, our findings suggest that the role of ITK is more complicated and nuanced in Th17 development. Indeed, SR has a number of PAMPS that may induce a very different environment in the lung than that induced during ovalbumin-induced allergic asthma50. This different environment may overcome the signaling requirement for ITK in the development of Th17 cells. However, our work suggests that the transcriptome of the resulting SR-induced Th17 cells are quite similar, although we should note that the absence of ITK does affect their ability to produce IL17A, since the Itk−/− Th17 cells express fewer transcripts for IL17A, suggesting that ITK’s role is blunted in response to SR exposure.
In conclusion, while we and others have previously shown that ITK is required for the development of conventional Th17 cells)11,22,23,24,31, our findings here suggest that the requirement for ITK in T cell production of IL17A is complex, and may depend on the conditions in vivo. These findings have important implications for the understanding of the signaling pathways that are required for the development of Th17 cells. They also have implications for the development of therapeutic approaches to inhibit IL17 driven inflammatory diseases, since inhibitors targeting ITK may have utility for some diseases where Th17 cells have a role, there may be other diseases, such as SR-driven HP, where they may have less utility.
Methods
Mice
All mice were on a C57Bl/6 background. Itk−/−, TCRδ (γδ T cell-deficient mice, B6.129P2-Tcrdtm1Mom/J, Jax Labs), IL4Rα−/− (a kind gift from Dr. Frank Brombacher, University of Cape Town, South Africa, via Dr. Fred Finkelman, University of Cincinnati51). IL17A-GFP reporter mice (C57BL/6-Il17atm1Bcgen/J were purchased from Biocytogen, and Foxp3-RFP reporter mice (C57BL/6-Foxp3tm1Flv/J) were from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Reporter strains were crossed to generate IL17A-GFP/Foxp3-RFP dual reporter strains in WT or Itk−/− background52. TCRδ/Itk−/− were previously described 53. All mice were housed in a specific pathogen-free environment, and male and female mice were between 6 and 8 weeks of age when used. All experiments were approved by the Office of Research Protection’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at The Pennsylvania State University and Cornell University.
SR-induced HP
Mice were exposed intranasally to 150 μg extract of SR (obtained by American Type Tissue Collection catalog no. 153347) 3 times a week up to 3 weeks28. Twenty-four hours after the last exposure, mice were sacrificed and analyzed, and measurements were taken from distinct samples.
Neutrophil Depletion
Neutrophils were depleted as previously described54. Briefly, WT IL17A-GFP/Foxp3-RFP mice were injected intravenously with 200 μg of 1A8 (BioXcell) or rat IgG2a (BioXcell) in 100 μl PBS prior to the first SR exposure, then subsequently every other day for 14 days in concert with SR induced HP.
Cell isolation, flow cytometry analysis, and T cell stimulation
Cells were isolated from BAL, lungs, spleen, and draining lymph nodes and analyzed by flow cytometry as previously described55. Cells were stained with the following antibodies at the concentration of 1:200: CD16/32 (i.e., Fc block, eBioscience), Fixable Viability Dye eFluor 506, anti-Ly6G PE-Cy7 or eFluor 450, anti-CD117 FITC, SiglecF PE, CD11b PE-Texas Red, anti-CD11c APC, anti-MHC II AF700, anti-CD49b PerCP eF710, anti-FcεRIα PECy7, anti-F4/80 APC/Cy7, anti-IL17A PerCP-CY5.5 (Ebioscience), anti-TCRβ APC-CY7 (Biolegend), anti-CD4 Alexa Fluor 700 or eFluor 450, anti-CD8α PE-Texas Red or PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-TCRδ APC, anti-NK1.1 Allophycocyanin, anti-CD44 V500, anti-CD62L PE-Cy7, anti-CD11b Alexa Fluor 647 (BD Pharmingen), anti-B220 Alexa Fluor 700, PE-PBS57 loaded CD1d tetramer was from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Tetramer Facility. Purified anti-CD3 and CD28 antibodies were from BD Biosciences. In some cases, cells were stimulated with PMA and Ionomycin followed by an analysis of intracellular cytokine as previously described56. Cells were analyzed using a BD FACS Aria II flow cytometer and analyzed with FlowJo software.
RNA sequencing and analysis
WT or Itk−/− IL17A-GFP/Foxp3-RFP mice were exposed to SR for up to 3 weeks and CD4+ IL17A-GFP+Foxp3-RFP− cells from SR exposed lungs were sorted using BD FACSAria Fusion Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorter. Isolated RNA from sorted cells was sequenced by the RNA Sequencing Core (Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine). Data were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA; QIAGEN Inc., https://www.qiagenbioinformatics.com/products/ingenuitypathway-analysis) or GeneSpring software version 14.1 (Agilent)), and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA)57,58 was used to determine biological pathways of significance. Panther pathway analysis was used to determine pathways related to genes that were significantly different in WT or Itk−/− Th17 cells34,35. Comparison of our transcriptome data with data from in vitro generated Th17 cells cultured (anti-CD3 in the presence of either IL1β, IL6 and IL23 (considered pathogenic, data set GSM3913969) or TGFβ and IL6 (considered non-pathogenic, GSM3913966), obtained from NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database series GSE133641 contributed by Ichiyama et al., 2019). Comparison with HDM-induced allergic airway inflammation induced Th17 cells (GSE100858,59). All FPKM values were converted to log2 for data analysis unless otherwise indicated. Excluding micro RNAs, we filtered 20,024 genes, based on the coefficient of valuation (CV) (for at least 1 out of 2 conditions was set to < 50.0 percent), and filtered on the error where the CV was greater than 100.
ATAC-sequencing and analysis
Sort purified CD4+ IL17A-GFP+Foxp3-RFP- from lungs of WT or Itk−/− IL17A-GFP/Foxp3-RFP mice exposed to SR were isolated as previously described. Isolated cells were processed, sequenced, and analyzed60,61 by the Transcriptional Regulation & Expression Facility (Cornell University, Center for Reproductive Genomics and College of Veterinary Medicine) and Novogene. BedGraph files were viewed in UCSC genome browser62.
Reverse transcription/quantitative PCR
RNA was extracted either using TRIZOL reagent (Invitrogen) or an RNAeasy kit (Invitrogen) and cDNA was generated using a You Prime First-Strand beads kit (GE Healthcare). qPCR was then performed using a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed using the comparative threshold cycle 2−ΔΔCT method, normalized to respective and the values were expressed as fold change compared to WT mice.
Histopathological analysis of lung sections
Lung samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde followed by staining with H&E63. Histological samples were analyzed and the severity of pathology was blindly assessed.
Statistics and reproducibility
Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA analysis were performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Differences with probability p ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis of two groups compared by Student’s t-test (unpaired). Statistical analysis of three or more groups was compared using a two-way ANOVA. Biological replicates or sample sizes are indicated in the figure legends.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the NCBI GEO repository https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE1165711. The source data underlying the graph in the paper are deposited in Figshare64.
References
Cypowyj, S., Picard, C., Marodi, L., Casanova, J. L. & Puel, A. Immunity to infection in IL-17-deficient mice and humans. Eur. J. Immunol. 42, 2246–2254 (2012).
Steinman, L. A brief history of T(H)17, the first major revision in the T(H)1/T(H)2 hypothesis of T cell-mediated tissue damage. Nat. Med. 13, 139–145 (2007).
Kaplan, M. H., Hufford, M. M. & Olson, M. R. The development and in vivo function of T helper 9 cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 295–307 (2015).
Coquet, J. M., Rausch, L. & Borst, J. The importance of co-stimulation in the orchestration of T helper cell differentiation. Immunol. Cell Biol. 93, 780–788 (2015).
Zhu, J., Yamane, H. & Paul, W. Differentiation of effector CD4 T cell populations. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 445–489 (2010).
Kirkham, B. W., Kavanaugh, A. & Reich, K. Interleukin-17A: a unique pathway in immune-mediated diseases: psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Immunology 141, 133–142 (2014).
Alcorn, J. F., Crowe, C. R. & Kolls, J. K. TH17 cells in asthma and COPD. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 72, 495–516 (2010).
Korn, T., Bettelli, E., Oukka, M. & Kuchroo, V. K. IL-17 and Th17 Cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 485–517 (2009).
Korn, T. et al. IL-21 initiates an alternative pathway to induce proinflammatory T(H)17 cells. Nature 448, 484–487 (2007).
Cho, H. S., Reboldi, A., Hall, J. A. & Berg, L. J. The Tec kinase ITK is essential for ILC2 survival and epithelial integrity in the intestine. Nat. Commun. 10, 784 (2019).
Eken, A. et al. Genetic deficiency and biochemical inhibition of ITK affect human Th17, Treg, and innate lymphoid cells. J. Clin. Immunol. 39, 391–400 (2019).
Huang, F. et al. The tyrosine kinase Itk suppresses CD8+ memory T cell development in response to bacterial infection. Sci. Rep. 5, 7688 (2015).
Linka, R. M. et al. Loss-of-function mutations within the IL-2 inducible kinase ITK in patients with EBV-associated lymphoproliferative diseases. Leukemia 26, 963–971 (2012).
Kapnick, S. M., Stinchcombe, J. C., Griffiths, G. M. & Schwartzberg, P. L. Inducible T cell kinase regulates the acquisition of cytolytic capacity and degranulation in CD8(+) CTLs. J. Immunol. 198, 2699–2711 (2017).
Prince, A. L. et al. Development of innate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in Itk-deficient mice is regulated by distinct pathways. J. Immunol. 193, 688–699 (2014).
Huang, W., Huang, F., Kannan, A. K., Hu, J. & August, A. ITK tunes IL-4-induced development of innate memory CD8+ T cells in a gammadelta T and invariant NKT cell-independent manner. J. Leukoc. Biol. 96, 55–63 (2014).
Solouki, S. et al. TCR signal strength and antigen affinity regulate CD8(+) memory T cells. J. Immunol. 205, 1217–1227 (2020).
Ghosh, S. et al. Interleukin-2-Inducible T-Cell Kinase Deficiency-New Patients, New Insight? Front. Immunol. 9, 979 (2018).
August, A. & Ragin, M. J. Regulation of T-cell responses and disease by tec kinase Itk. Int. Rev. Immunol. 31, 155–165 (2012).
Andreotti, A. H., Schwartzberg, P. L., Joseph, R. E. & Berg, L. J. T-cell signaling regulated by the Tec family kinase, Itk. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2, a002287 (2010).
Huang, W., Jeong, A. R., Kannan, A. K., Huang, L. & August, A. IL-2-inducible T cell kinase tunes T regulatory cell development and is required for suppressive function. J. Immunol. 193, 2267–2272 (2014).
Gomez-Rodriguez, J. et al. Itk-mediated integration of T cell receptor and cytokine signaling regulates the balance between Th17 and regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 211, 529–543 (2014).
Elmore, J. P. et al. Tuning T helper cell differentiation by ITK. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 48, 179–185 (2020).
Gomez-Rodriguez, J. et al. Differential expression of interleukin-17A and -17F is coupled to T cell receptor signaling via inducible T cell kinase. Immunity 31, 587–597 (2009).
Mamontov, P. et al. A negative role for the interleukin-2-inducible T-cell kinase (ITK) in human Foxp3+ TREG differentiation. PLoS ONE 14, e0215963 (2019).
Yi, E. S. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab Sci. 39, 581–629 (2002).
Simonian, P. et al. IL-17A-expressing T cells are essential for bacterial clearance in a murine model of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Immunol. 182, 6540–6549 (2009).
Simonian, P. et al. Th17-polarized immune response in a murine model of hypersensitivity pneumonitis and lung fibrosis. J. Immunol. 182, 657–665 (2009).
Gudmundsson, G. & Hunninghake, G. W. Interferon-gamma is necessary for the expression of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Clin. Invest. 99, 2386–2390 (1997).
Joshi, A. D. et al. Interleukin-17-mediated immunopathogenesis in experimental hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 179, 705–716 (2009).
Kannan, A. et al. Allele-sensitive mutant, Itkas, reveals that Itk kinase activity is required for Th1, Th2, Th17, and iNKT-cell cytokine production. Eur. J. Immunol. 45, 2276–2285 (2015).
Berg, L. J. Strength of T cell receptor signaling strikes again. Immunity 31, 529–531 (2009).
Owen, D. L. et al. Thymic regulatory T cells arise via two distinct developmental programs. Nat. Immunol. 20, 195–205 (2019).
Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Ebert, D., Huang, X. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D419–d426 (2019).
Mi, H. & Thomas, P. PANTHER pathway: an ontology-based pathway database coupled with data analysis tools. Methods Mol. Biol. 563, 123–140 (2009).
Ciofani, M. et al. A validated regulatory network for Th17 cell specification. Cell 151, 289–303 (2012).
Lee, Y. et al. Induction and molecular signature of pathogenic TH17 cells. Nat. Immunol. 13, 991–999 (2012).
Weaver, C. T., Harrington, L. E., Mangan, P. R., Gavrieli, M. & Murphy, K. M. Th17: an effector CD4 T cell lineage with regulatory T cell ties. Immunity 24, 677–688 (2006).
Simonian, P. et al. γδ T cells protect against lung fibrosis via IL-22. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2239–2253 (2010).
Yamana, T. et al. IL-17A-secreting memory γδ T cells play a pivotal role in sensitization and development of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Immunol. 206, 355–365 (2021).
Abi Abdallah, D. S., Egan, C. E., Butcher, B. A. & Denkers, E. Y. Mouse neutrophils are professional antigen-presenting cells programmed to instruct Th1 and Th17 T-cell differentiation. Int. Immunol. 23, 317–326 (2011).
Hasan, S. A. et al. Role of IL-17A and neutrophils in fibrosis in experimental hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 131, 1663–1673 (2013).
Huppler, A. R., Verma, A. H., Conti, H. R. & Gaffen, S. L. Neutrophils do not express IL-17A in the context of acute oropharyngeal candidiasis. Pathogens 4, 559–572 (2015).
Nance, S., Cross, R., Yi, A. K. & Fitzpatrick, E. A. IFN-gamma production by innate immune cells is sufficient for development of hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Eur. J. Immunol. 35, 1928–1938 (2005).
Delgoffe, G. M. et al. The kinase mTOR regulates the differentiation of helper T cells through the selective activation of signaling by mTORC1 and mTORC2. Nat. Immunol. 12, 295–303 (2011).
Nagai, S., Kurebayashi, Y. & Koyasu, S. Role of PI3K/Akt and mTOR complexes in Th17 cell differentiation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1280, 30–34 (2013).
Howie, D. et al. The role of lipid metabolism in T lymphocyte differentiation and survival. Front. Immunol. 8, 1949 (2017).
Berod, L. et al. De novo fatty acid synthesis controls the fate between regulatory T and T helper 17 cells. Nat. Med. 20, 1327–1333 (2014).
Cerboni, S., Gehrmann, U., Preite, S. & Mitra, S. Cytokine-regulated Th17 plasticity in human health and diseases. Immunology 163, 3–18 (2021).
Nance, S. C., Yi, A. K., Re, F. C. & Fitzpatrick, E. A. MyD88 is necessary for neutrophil recruitment in hypersensitivity pneumonitis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 83, 1207–1217 (2008).
Horsnell, W. G. et al. Delayed goblet cell hyperplasia, acetylcholine receptor expression, and worm expulsion in SMC-specific IL-4Ralpha-deficient mice. PLoS Pathog. 3, e1 (2007).
Huang, W., Solouki, S., Koylass, N., Zheng, S. G. & August, A. ITK signalling via the Ras/IRF4 pathway regulates the development and function of Tr1 cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 15871 (2017).
Qi, Q. et al. Enhanced development of CD4+ {gamma}{delta} T cells in the absence of Itk results in elevated IgE production. Blood 114, 564–571 (2009). Epub 2009 May 14.
Carr, K. D. et al. Specific depletion reveals a novel role for neutrophil-mediated protection in the liver during Listeria monocytogenes infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 41, 2666–2676 (2011).
Kannan, A., Sahu, N., Mohanan, S., Mohinta, S. & August, A. Itk modulates allergic airway inflammation by suppressing IFNγ in naïve CD4+ T-cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 132, 811–820 (2013). e811-815.
Mohinta, S. et al. Differential regulation of th17 and T regulatory cell differentiation by aryl hydrocarbon receptor dependent xenobiotic response element dependent and independent pathways. Toxicol. Sci. 145, 233–243 (2015).
Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).
Mootha, V. K. et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 34, 267–273 (2003).
Ito, T. et al. IL-22 induces Reg3γ and inhibits allergic inflammation in house dust mite-induced asthma models. J. Exp. Med. 214, 3037–3050 (2017).
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
Varet, H., Brillet-Guéguen, L., Coppée, J. Y. & Dillies, M. A. SARTools: a DESeq2- and EdgeR-Based R Pipeline for Comprehensive Differential Analysis of RNA-Seq Data. PLoS ONE 11, e0157022 (2016).
Kent, W. J. et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 12, 996–1006 (2002).
Walsh, E. et al. Computational and experimental analysis reveals a requirement for eosinophil-derived IL-13 for the development of allergic airway responses in C57BL/6 mice. J. Immunol. 186, 2936–2949 (2011). Epub 2011 Feb 29.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ling Zhang for technical assistance, members in the August lab for comments and feedback, and Dr. Jen Grenier of the RNA Sequencing Core for guidance. Funding: This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (AI120701 and AI138570 to A.A., AI129422 to A.A and W.H., and AI132738 to A.S.) and an HHMI Professorship (A.A.). C.C. and J.E. were supported as Cornell Sloan Scholars (supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation), J.E. was also supported by the training program in Biomedical and Bioengineering at Cornell University (funded by NIH T32EB023860). M.O-R. was supported by R25GM096955, A.B. was a McNair Scholar, and the RNA Sequencing Core is supported by U54 HD076210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.E., C.C., A.R., N.K., A.B., M.M., M.O., and W.H. performed experiments; J.E., C.C., N.K., A.B., M.O., W.H., A.S., and A.A. analyzed and interpreted data; J.E., C.C., and A.A., wrote the paper; J.E. performed bioinformatic analyses; A.A. conceived the research and designed experiments.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
A.A. receives research support from 3M Company. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Biology thanks Ahmet Eken, Constantine Tsoukas, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Damon Tumes, Karli Montague-Cardoso, and Christina Karlsson Rosenthal.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Elmore, J., Carter, C., Redko, A. et al. ITK independent development of Th17 responses during hypersensitivity pneumonitis driven lung inflammation. Commun Biol 5, 162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03109-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03109-1
- Springer Nature Limited