Introduction

Subjects who have ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) experience angina-like symptoms, with ischemic evidence on stress electrocardiogram or isotope perfusion scan, but without coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiogram (CAG)1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Endothelium activation, inflammation, oxidative stress, and insulin resistance (IR) are proposed as possible mechanisms underlying INOCA1,4,7,8,9. Studies have revealed that chronic inflammation could mediate microvascular dysfunction and result in impaired coronary flow reserve in INOCA9,10.

Studies have reported that hyperinsulinemia during oral or intravenous glucose tolerance test was more prominent in the INOCA group than in controls, implying that IR could contribute to microvascular angina11,12. Using hyperinsulinemia and the euglycemia clamp test, other investigators found that subjects with INOCA had a higher degree of IR compared to controls13,14. A recent study showed that IR was associated with a decrease in coronary flow reserve during acute hyperglycemia challenge in the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), implying the detrimental impact of IR on coronary microvascular function15. Furthermore, subjects with INOCA are more commonly associated with metabolic syndrome, adiposity, and inflammatory derangements1,16,17,18. Obesity and associated inflammation could lead to global structural and functional abnormalities in the microvasculature17,18.

Previous studies in patients with INOCA showed that they have a favorable long-term prognosis19,20. However, data from a large national Danish patient registry showed that patients with stable angina without obstructive coronary disease have a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality compared to controls21. Some registry reports a two-fold increase in annual rates of major adverse cardiovascular events in subjects with INOCA22,23,24. Furthermore, patients with INOCA also have an adverse quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity with relatively frequent visits to healthcare providers for persistent or recurring disability symptoms22,24.

Although the pathogenesis of INOCA may be related to IR, no studies have investigated its impact on long-term survival. The objectives of the present study are to investigate IR and glucose regulation in subjects with INOCA without known diabetes mellitus (DM) and to find associated factors related to survival.

Materials and methods

Study population

From April 5, 2009, to December 31, 2020, a total of 49,103 cardiac catheterization procedures were performed in our catheterization laboratories, including CAG, percutaneous coronary or peripheral vascular interventions, electrophysiological studies, catheter radiofrequency ablations, and pacemaker implantations. Among them, 25,560 catheterizations were for CAG or CAG plus percutaneous coronary intervention for angina pectoris or acute coronary syndromes. Among patients undergoing these procedures, 1538 patients with angina but without known DM, who were admitted for CAG with non-invasive tests showing evidence of myocardial ischemia, agreed to receive OGTT and blood tests for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and circulating inflammatory markers 2 weeks after hospital discharge (Fig. 1)25. Subjects with significant coronary stenosis (SYNTAX score > 0) 26 or previous histories of surgical or percutaneous coronary revascularization before the index were excluded for analysis in this study. For INOCA (N = 587) (Fig. 1)25,27, we used the definition proposed by Lanza et al. 29 with some minor modifications that included 1. typical stable angina; 2. findings consistent with myocardial ischemia on non-invasive tests, such as diagnostic ST segment depression on exercise electrocardiogram or reversible perfusion defects on stress myocardial scintigraphy; 3. normal (or near normal) CAG (SYNTAX score = 0)26. All-cause mortality was recorded until 31 March 2021 and served as a follow-up result. Mortality data were matched from the National Death Registry and obtained from the Center for Collaboration on Health Information Application, Department of Health, Executive Yuan, Taiwan. The study protocol was approved by the Human Research Review Committee of Taichung Veterans General Hospital (Taichung, Taiwan).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study enrollment protocol. CAD: coronary artery disease; CAG: coronary angiogram; DM: diabetes mellitus; EPS: electrophysiology study; INOCA: ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries; OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention.

Oral glucose tolerance test, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin resistance indices

Study subjects underwent blood tests and OGTT after 8 h of fasting to investigate abnormal glucose regulation. After collecting a fasting blood sample, a glucose load of 75 g was ingested for 5 min. Blood samples were taken 30 min and 120 min after test load. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were measured in each sample. Serum insulin was determined using a commercially available assay kit (Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany). The detectable range was 0.2–1000 µIU/ml. The intra and inter-assay coefficients of variation for insulin were 1.9–2.0% and 2.5–2.8%, respectively. Fasting IR was estimated using the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), defined as fasting glucose mg/dl x fasting insulin μU/ml/40528,29. HbA1c was measured by boronate affinity high-performance liquid chromatography (CLC385TM, Primus Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA). The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for HbA1c [range 22 mmol (4.2%)–191 mmol/mol (19.6%)] were < 0.9% and < 2.9%, respectively.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

Serum creatinine was obtained at index admission before cardiac catheterization and study recruitment. eGFR was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault Eq. 30,31.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were expressed as median (interquartile range, 25th to 75th percentile) for non-normally distributed data or as mean ± standard deviation for normally distributed data. Categorical data were expressed as percentages. Differences in non-normally distributed continuous variables between INOCA that survived or died were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, while normally distributed data were analyzed using Student’s t test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as indicated. The incidence rate of mortality was calculated by the number of mortalities divided by the sum of the total observation person-years. Cox regression survival analyses were used to test significant variables associated with INOCA subjects who survived or died. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyzes were performed using index admission fasting glucose or eGFR to differentiate survival vs. mortality during follow-up. A two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The SPSS 12.1 statistical software package (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for all calculations.

Results

OGTT and HbA1c data for subjects with INOCA

A total of 587 subjects with INOCA without known DM were enrolled for investigation with OGTT and HbA1c. The mean fasting glucose was 95 ± 14 mg/dl, mean glucose at OGTT 2 h was 139 ± 45 mg/dl and the mean HbA1c was 5.8 ± 0.6 in the INOCA study cohort (Table 1). Subjects with INOCA who died during the follow-up period had significantly higher fasting glucose (101 ± 17 vs. 94 ± 13 mg/dl, p = 0.003) than those who survived (Table 1). On the contrary, subjects with INOCA who died during the follow-up period had significantly lower fasting insulin (8.4 ± 6.5 vs. 11.7 ± 10.0 µIU/ml, p = 0.049) than those who survived (Table 1). Other OGTT data and HbA1c were not significantly different between those who survived or died.

Table 1 Results of oral glucose tolerance tests for ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) who survived or died during the follow-up period (baseline status without known diabetes mellitus).

Revision of the diagnosis of abnormal glucose regulation after OGTT and HbA1c tests for subjects with INOCA (status without known DM)

After OGTT and HbA1c tests, only 25.6% of subjects with INOCA, a state without known DM, were in normal glucose regulation, while 86 subjects (14.7%) were newly diagnosed with DM and 351 (59.8%) had pre-DM (Table 2). The proportion of study subjects with normal glucose regulation, DM, and pre-DM was similar between those who survived or died during the follow-up period (Table 2).

Table 2 Revised diagnosis of normal and abnormal glucose regulation after oral glucose tolerance test and HbA1c for subjects with INOCA (status without known diabetes mellitus).

Baseline demographic data from subjects with INOCA who had abnormal vs. normal glucose regulation after the investigation

For subjects with INOCA with abnormal glucose regulation, they were significantly older and had a higher BMI and systolic blood pressure (Table 3). Those with abnormal glucose regulation also had significantly lower eGFR (Table 3).

Table 3 Baseline demographic data for ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery arteries (INOCA) that have abnormal versus normal glucose regulation after OGTT/ HbA1c investigation (baseline status without known diabetes mellitus).

Baseline demographic data of subjects with INOCA who survived or died during the follow-up period

A total of 587 subjects with INOCA without known DM and with OGTT data were analyzed. After a median follow-up duration of 7.03 years, 39 subjects died. The incidence rate of all-cause mortality was 9.9 / 1,000 person-year. Among deaths, 12 were due to cardiovascular mortality and the incidence rate was 3.0/1000 person-year. Those who died were older and had a lower eGFR (54 ± 22 vs. 87 ± 30 ml/min, p < 0.001) and lower body mass index (Table 4).

Table 4 Baseline demographic data for ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery arteries (INOCA) that survived or died during the follow-up period (baseline status without known diabetes mellitus).

Cox regression analysis of associated factors for all-cause death in INOCA without known DM

In the Cox survival regression analysis, a higher eGFR (hazard ratio 0.972, p = 0.006) was protective for better survival, while a higher fasting glucose (hazard ratio 1.024, p = 0.009) was related to worse all-cause mortality for INOCA without known DM. Other OGTT values, such as fasting insulin, or 2 h glucose or insulin were not associated with mortality (Table 5). Neither newly diagnosed DM nor pre-DM were associated with all-cause mortality.

Table 5 Cox regression analysis of associated factors for all-cause mortality in ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) (status without known diabetes mellitus) (N = 587).

Cox regression analysis of associated factors for all-cause death in non-diabetic INOCA (after excluding subjects with newly diagnosed DM)

After excluding subjects with newly diagnosed DM (N = 86), the remaining 501 non-diabetic INOCA were analyzed. Higher fasting glucose (hazard ratio 1.053, p = 0.007) was related to worse all-cause mortality, while higher eGFR was protective for less mortality (hazard ratio 0.967, p = 0.012). Furthermore, older age and higher diastolic blood pressure were associated with worse mortality (Table 6).

Table 6 Cox regression analysis of associated factors for all-cause mortality in non-diabetic subjects who have ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA), (N = 501) (after excluding subjects with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus).

The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis uses fasting glucose or eGFR data to differentiate between death and survival in non-diabetic INOCA

Using fasting glucose (mg/dl) ROC analysis to predict mortality in non-diabetic INOCA (N = 501), the area under the curve was 0.659 (95% confidence interval 0.565–0.753, p = 0.003) (Fig. 2A). Fasting glucose at 89.5 mg/dl showed a sensitivity of 86.7% and a specificity of 44.4% in predicting mortality during the follow-up period. Using eGFR ROC analysis (ml/min) to predict the survival of subjects with non-diabetic INOCA (N = 501), the area under the curve was 0.848 (95% confidence interval 0.795–0.901, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2B). A cut-off value of eGFR at 73.2 ml/min showed a sensitivity of 67.7% and a specificity of 93.3% to predict survival during the follow-up period.

Fig. 2
figure 2

(A) Analysis of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using fasting glucose (mg/dl) for predicting the mortality of non-diabetic INOCA (N = 501), the area under the curve was 0.659 (95% confidence interval 0.565–0.753, p = 0.003). (B) Analysis of the ROC curve using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (ml/min) to predict the survival of non-diabetic INOCA (N = 501), the area under the curve was 0.848 (95% confidence interval 0.795–0.901, p < 0.001).

Discussions

Although INOCA may be related to IR, no studies have investigated its impact on long-term survival. In this study, we found that the incidence rate of all-cause mortality in INOCA without known DM was 9.9 /1000 person-year. Furthermore, the incidence rate for cardiovascular mortality was 3.0/1000 person-year. For INOCA without known DM, after OGTT and HbA1c tests, 14.7% were newly diagnosed with DM and 59.8% had pre-DM (Table 2). After excluding subjects with newly diagnosed DM, we found that higher fasting glucose was significantly associated with worse mortality but higher eGFR was protective for better survival in non-diabetic INOCA.

In this study, the investigation of OGTT and HbA1c in subjects with INOCA without known DM revealed a high proportion of subjects with abnormal glucose regulation, including 14.7% with newly diagnosed DM and 59.8% with pre-DM (Table 2). Our previous studies showed that subjects with INOCA had a higher IR, more with hypertension, and a non-significantly higher body mass index compared to the control group2,3. Our group also demonstrated that subjects with CAD had significantly higher insulin at OGTT 2 h than those with INOCA25. We previously showed that newly diagnosed DM through OGTT was associated with an increased risk of composite adverse endpoints in patients with CAD32. Glucose at OGTT 2 h provided greater predictive power to predict major adverse endpoints in CAD than fasting glucose and HbA1c32. However, in this study, it is the higher fasting glucose that is helpful in predicting a worse mortality in non-diabetic INOCA. How fasting or post-challenge IR index translate into adverse events for CAD or INOCA requires further in vivo or in vitro studies to elucidate the underlying mechanism. However, it is worthwhile and productive to investigate abnormal glucose regulation in subjects with INOCA.

Regarding survival studies in INOCA, the WISE study reported the elevated risk of 10-year mortality among women with signs and symptoms of ischemia but without obstructive coronary artery disease (13%) compared to a nationally representative cohort of American women approximately the same age during the same period (2.8%)23. Data from a Danish national patient registry showed that INOCA patients have higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratios of 1.29, p = 0.007) compared to controls21. In this study, the incidence rate of mortality for INOCA without known DM was 9.9 /1000 person-year. Few studies have investigated the associated factors for INOCA survival. This study was extended to show that higher fasting glucose was associated with all-cause mortality for non-diabetic INOCA. Other OGTT values, such as fasting insulin, glucose or insulin at OGTT 2 h, were not associated with mortality.

In this study, we did not work on the underlying mechanism of why higher fasting glucose was associated with worse mortality for non-diabetic INOCA. One study reported that INOCA subjects with normal glycemia had a lower percentage of coronary endothelial dysfunction compared to INOCA with pre-DM, as elucidated by intracoronary acetylcholine-induced coronary blood flow change33. At the 24th month of follow-up, major adverse events were higher in INOCA with pre-DM versus with normal glycemia33. Another report of takotsubo cardiomyopathy showed that patients with hyperglycemia at admission had higher norepinephrine and inflammatory makers and worse clinical outcomes34. Further work on glucose related endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory provocations is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanism of higher fasting glucose-related worse mortality in non-diabetic INOCA.

There were limitations to this study. First, this INOCA study only used all-cause or cardiovascular mortality as a hard outcome, but did not record admissions for myocardial infarction, heart failure, or stroke. Second, this study conducted OGTT and HbA1c in subjects with INOCA and followed their outcome, but was an observational and association analysis without investigating the underlying mechanism. Therefore, we cannot elucidate the rationale why a higher fasting glucose, but not glucose at OGTT 2 h, was related to all-cause mortality. Third, our INOCA group had a heterogeneous degree of severity of ischemic evidence from radionuclide myocardium perfusion scan or treadmill exercise electrocardiogram, and we did not quantitatively compare their ischemic evidence6. Fourth, in this study, we did not investigate the coronary flow reserve data using non-invasive or invasive methods.

In conclusion, in this study, we found that the incidence rate for all-cause mortality was 9.9 /1000 person-year in INOCA without known DM. After investigation with OGTT and HbA1c tests, subjects with INOCA but without known DM revealed a high proportion (77.4%) of them with abnormal glucose regulation. Higher fasting glucose was significantly associated with worse mortality, while higher eGFR was protective for better survival in non-diabetic INOCA. Aggressive lifestyle modification and renal protection are warranted for these patients.