Introduction

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that require lifelong treatment to achieve sustained remission and to prevent disease flares. UC is a continuous disease involving the mucosal layer of the rectum to the colon, whereas CD involves the whole layer (transmural) of the gastrointestinal tract with a skipped pattern. Because of chronic inflammation of the bowel which interferences absorption of micronutrients1 and frequent steroid treatment in IBD patients, vitamin D deficiency is an important issue in this population. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with disease activity2,3,4,5,6,7,8 and results in decreased bone marrow density and fracture events in IBD patients9,10,11. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency ranges from 22 and 63% according to different studies which use different reference value to define deficiency2,3,7,8,12,13,14,15. The etiologies of IBD are multi-factorial, comprising interactions between genes, the environment, the immune system, and microbiota16,17. Epidemiologic research has shown that IBD is more frequently diagnosed at higher altitudes18 and during winter19, suggesting a connection between its development and vitamin D deficiency. Traditionally, vitamin D plays a role in bone and mineral metabolism, but recent evidence shows that it also plays a role in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune disorders20,21 and IBD22, as well as serving as an immune-regulatory factor between the host immune system and gut microbiota23,24.

Globally, vitamin D deficiency, defined as a concentration < 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) according to the Endocrine Society guideline25, is common in the general population across all age groups26. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with many health problems such as chronic kidney disease27,28,29, diabetes mellitus20,30, cardiovascular disease31, cerebrovascular disease32, certain types of malignancy33, and autoimmune disease20,21. However, it remains unclear whether a lack of vitamin D leads to the development of these disorders or whether it is a symptom. Vitamin D has been shown to have an immune modulatory role and may be implicated in the etiology of diseases. Moreover, a lack of vitamin D frequently arises because of chronic disorders. The major source of vitamin D originates from skin production by exposure to ultraviolet B radiation from sunlight, with only a small part obtained from food. Many factors are associated with vitamin D deficiency, including insufficient sunlight exposure, reduced dietary sources, lack of physical activity, chronic kidney disease that reduces the renal transformation of active vitamin D, and malabsorption or intestinal inflammation22,29,34,35,36.

Vitamin D deficiency is a recognized problem among patients with IBD as well as the general population2,3,5,8,37. A meta-analysis of 14 studies by Rita et al.38, comprising 1891 patients (938 patients with IBD and 953 controls), showed that patients with IBD had 64% higher odds of vitamin D deficiency than controls (OR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.30–2.08). Nonetheless, most reported cases were from regions with a high prevalence of IBD, and data from the Asian population is limited. In Taiwan, the incidence and prevalence of IBD are increasing39. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in this growing population. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and risk factors of vitamin D insufficiency in a Taiwanese IBD cohort.

Materials and methods

Study design and patients

This study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in central Taiwan, enrolling adult IBD patients who participated in a prospective observational registry study. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects who participated this study. Patients who had check-ups for vitamin D concentrations between January 2017 and December 2023 were included in this analysis. IBD was diagnosed through clinical symptoms, signs, an endoscopic image, and histological confirmation with a catastrophic illness certificate from Taiwan Health Insurance. The inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of either Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis certified by the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan. The exclusion criteria included patients aged < 20 years at the date of vitamin D concentration check-up. Demographic, clinical (e.g., disease activity, extent of GI tract involvement, and modality of treatment), and laboratory data were collected. The modality of treatment included steroids, 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), biologics, and azathioprine (AZA). Recent use of medication is defined as within 3 months of measurement of vitamin D. Laboratory data included white blood cell (WBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb), platelet count, albumin, and c-reactive protein (CRP). Risk factors for vitamin D were evaluated from the patients’ medical records. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Changhua Christian Hospital (IRB number: CCH IRB No. 181014, date of approval: November 26, 2018).

Laboratory studies

The serum vitamin D concentration (25-OH vitamin D total) was quantitatively measured using the electrochemiluminescence method via a Cobas® immunoassay analyzer from Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany. Before May 15, 2020, we used Elecsys Vitamin D Assay, and after May 15, 2020, we used Elecsys Vitamin D Total II, which is a second-generation assay. The results are expressed in nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Vitamin D deficiency is defined as a concentration < 20 ng/mL, while a normal level is defined as ≥ 20 ng/mL, including insufficient (between 20 and 29 ng/mL) and sufficient (≥ 30 ng/mL) vitamin D levels.

Definition of remission

The definition of clinical remission of CD is a Crohn’s disease activity index (CDAI) of < 15040. The CDAI is composed of eight clinical or laboratory variables with different weights and ranges from 0 to 600. The definition of clinical remission in UC is a Mayo score of < 3 points (including 0, 1, or 2)41. The Mayo score consists of four parts of sub-scores (0–3), including rectal bleeding, stool frequency, physician assessment, and endoscopy appearance, with a total possible score of 0–12.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as numbers and percentages. Continuous data are expressed as mean and standard deviation or as the median and interquartile range (IQR) for normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. The distribution of continuous variables was examined by one-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test; continuous variables were compared by Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with vitamin D deficiency. In the multivariate adjustment model with backward elimination, data were adjusted for age, duration from disease onset to vitamin D measurement, sex, clinical remission, treatments (e.g., steroids, 5-ASA, biologics, and AZA), laboratory data (WBC count, Hb, platelet count, albumin, and CRP), IBD subtypes, and abdominal surgery. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 106 adult patients with IBD who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included, including 20 patients with CD and 86 with UC. The median age at diagnosis was 39.2 years, with a predominant male population (57.5%). The comparison of baseline characteristics between patients with CD and those with UC are shown in Table 1. The mean vitamin D concentration was 22.2 ± 8 ng/mL in the whole study population, 24.7 ± 7.4 ng/mL in patients with CD, and 21.6 ± 8.1 ng/mL in patients with UC. According to the level of vitamin D, 45 patients (42.5%) had vitamin D deficiency, 44 patients (41.5%) had vitamin D insufficiency, and 17 patients (16.0%) had a sufficient vitamin D level (Table 1). According to the subgroups of vitamin D sufficiency, insufficiency, and deficiency, the mean 25-OH vitamin D total was higher in patients with CD than those with UC (sufficiency: 37[3.3] vs. 34.9[1.5], insufficiency: 25.4[0.6] vs. 24.1[0.5], deficiency: 15.8[1.9] vs. 14.9[0.6]) as shown in Fig. 1.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the IBD population (comparisons between patients with CD and UC).
Figure 1
figure 1

Mean and standard error of mean (SEM) of the total 25-OH vitamin D among patients with CD and those with UC (classified as sufficient if vitamin D ≥ 30 ng/mL, insufficient 20–29 ng/mL, and deficient < 20 ng/mL).

Among the whole study population, 56 patients (52.8%) remained in clinical remission. The patients with CD presented a higher percentage of the stricturing type (45%), followed by non-stricturing and non-penetrating type (30%), penetrating type (15%), and perianal fistula (10%). Additionally, among patients with UC, 38.4% of patients had extensive colitis, 34.9% had left-side colitis, and 26.7% had proctitis. For recent IBD medications, including steroids, 5-ASA, and biologics, there was no significant difference between the CD and UC groups, but more patients with CD had recent AZA (25% in the CD group and 5.8% in the UC group). The laboratory data showed no significant difference between the CD and UC groups. Six patients had abdominal surgery, all of whom were in the CD group.

Table 2 shows the comparisons between the groups with a normal vitamin D level and those with a deficiency. The vitamin D deficient group had less males (37.8%) (p < 0.001). Among several laboratory parameters, significantly increased leukocyte counts (7.8 ± 2.1 vs. 6.8 ± 1.8 *103/μL, p = 0.012) and significantly decreased Hb levels (13 [11.6–14.3] vs. 14 [13–14.9] g/dL, p = 0.006) were found in the vitamin D deficient group. Moreover, there was a trend toward younger age at diagnosis in the group with vitamin D deficiency (35.5 [28.2–48.9] vs. 43.3 [30.9–54.1], p = 0.060), but no significant difference in the duration from disease onset to vitamin D measurement between the two groups (median 3 and 1 years for patients with normal and deficient vitamin D levels, respectively; p = 0.422).

Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the IBD population (comparisons between the groups with and without vitamin D deficiency).

Table 3 illustrates the risk factors related to vitamin D deficiency. The results revealed no significant difference between patients with and without vitamin D deficiency in terms of the medications, percentage of patients in clinical remission, or abdominal surgery for IBD. Increased age at diagnosis (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92–0.99, p = 0.007) and male sex (OR: 0.23, 95% CI 0.09–0.63, p = 0.004) are linked to a considerably lower odds ratio after multivariate adjustment. In other words, early age at diagnosis and female sex were identified as statistically significant risk factors of vitamin D deficiency. Additionally, an increased leukocyte count is associated with increased risk of vitamin D deficiency (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01–1.77, p = 0.042).

Table 3 Risk factors related to vitamin D deficiency.

Discussion

Our study is the first to report the prevalence and risk factors of vitamin D deficiency among the Taiwanese IBD population. Our study revealed a mean vitamin D concentration 22.2 ± 8 ng/mL and 42.5% of our population with vitamin D deficiency. In a study of vitamin D deficiency among a healthy adult population in northern Taiwan, the mean vitamin D concentration was 28.9 ng/mL, and 22.4% of the study population had vitamin D deficiency42. Several co-factors, including diet, outdoor activity, use of sunscreen lotion, percentage of sunny/rainy days, female sex, urban living, educational status, vitamin D supplementation, and chronic diseases, are known to influence the prevalence of vitamin deficiency. The study of the healthy general population of northern Taiwan showed that the predictors of vitamin D deficiency were female sex, lower age, high educational status, living in an urban area, and physical inactivity, while our study showed that female sex and early age at diagnosis were risk factors.

Vitamin D is mainly synthesized in the skin upon exposure to sunlight, and 20% is obtained from dietary sources26,30,36. Previous studies found a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among patients with IBD26,43,44. Additionally, the Asian population with dark skin pigmentation may have reduced sunlight penetration, which can have a negative effect on vitamin D synthesis13,45. Moreover, vertebral fractures are more common in patients with IBD than in the healthy population9. Before beginning steroid medication, it is crucial to understand the status of vitamin D deficiency. To prevent low bone mineral density, vitamin D monitoring and supplementation are suggested in patients with IBD with active disease or those who are treated with steroids46. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the IBD population ranged from 40%47 to 92%48 in Korea, 60–100% in Japan10, and 42% in the present study. Thus, although it is vital to determine the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the Asian population, this is not currently addressed in the Asian IBD practice recommendations49,50,51.

Vitamin D receptors are found in nearly all types of immune cells, highly expressed in the small intestine and colon and involved in both innate and adaptive immune systems. Vitamin D also plays an important role in intestinal homeostasis where it serves to maintain the integrity of the intestinal barrier52. However, it remains unclear whether vitamin D deficiency is a contributing factor to the pathogenesis of IBD53,54 or a consequence of malabsorption from intestinal damage55. Previous studies have reported lower vitamin D levels in women56,57, and our study showed that female sex is a risk factor. However, no such correlation is shown in other studies2,3,8,58. The study by Alex Ulitsky et al.2 showed that older age and older age at diagnosis were associated with vitamin D deficiency. Our study showed that younger age at diagnosis is a risk factor for vitamin D deficiency. Moreover, younger age at disease onset has been shown to be an unfavorable prognostic factor for IBD59,60, which requires more medical attention in the future. Our findings indicate the necessity of vitamin D screening in our young population51,61. Meta-analysis showed vitamin D supplementation effectively improves the vitamin D concentration and decreases CRP level in adult43 and pediatric IBD patients62. However, the prevalence of untreated vitamin D deficiency is 82% in IBD patients63 which disclosed clinical overlook of the issue of vitamin D deficiency. Society guidelines recommend supplementation of vitamin D is recommended for those with documented deficiency49,50,51 to prevent osteoporosis during disease treatment. Additionally, such supplementation is safe and has a positive effect on disease outcomes, which is particularly important for the pediatric population when therapeutic options for IBD are often restricted43,44,64.

Vitamin D levels differ between patients with CD and those with UC. Due to the involvement or resection of the small intestine in CD, some studies have found lower vitamin D levels among patients with CD than among those with UC7,12. However, in our study, the mean vitamin D concentration was found to be lower in patients with UC than in those with CD, although not significantly (UC 21.6 ± 8.1 ng/mL, CD 24.7 ± 7.4 ng/mL). This may be attributed to the small percentage of patients with CD in our study. Vitamin D deficiency is linked to disease activity5,37,65. Indeed, a previous meta-analysis of 27 studies from Gubatan et al.44, comprising 8316 patients with IBD, summarized that low vitamin D level is significantly associated with disease activity (OR: 1.53, 95% CI 1.32–1.77). In addition to clinical evaluation, studies have demonstrated an inverse relationship between vitamin D level and inflammatory markers, such as leukocyte counts, CRP, and fecal calprotectin, in the IBD population4,12,66. In our study, the group with vitamin D deficiency had a significantly higher leukocyte count (7.8 ± 2.1 vs. 6.8 ± 1.8 *103/μL, p = 0.012); however, there was no significant difference in CRP levels. The group with vitamin D deficiency had a significantly lower Hb level compared to the control group in our research (13 [11.6–14.3] vs. 14 [13–14.9] g/dL, p = 0.006), which may reflect the severity of bowel damage. Moreover, in our study, a lower percentage of patients remained in clinical remission in the group with vitamin D deficiency (46.7% vs. 57.4%, P = 0.275), although the difference was not statistically significant.

Our investigation has several limitations that warrant discussion. First, the number of cases was relatively low, particularly in the CD group. This limited the currently low prevalence of IBD population in our region67,68. Second, although this is a prospective and observational study of patient medical records, undergoing a vitamin D check-up and receiving subsequent treatment were not mandatory for participation. Additionally, we did not investigate the outcomes for patients after vitamin D treatment. However, determining the impact of such treatment is challenging, as supplements are commonly sold over-the-counter, making it difficult to monitor their intake retrospectively. Additionally, the measurement of vitamin D and treatment of its insufficiency are currently not reimbursed by our national health insurance. Indeed, only two-thirds of our IBD population reported having undergone a check-up of vitamin D concentration in our institution68. Since therapies and tests to measure vitamin D levels require out of pocket money and given that not all patients are willing to undergo screening, it is critical that more people become aware of the significant lack of vitamin D that this population is experiencing, and the current study represents an important step in this direction. It is necessary to perform further research to analyze the food pattern, sun exposure, and vitamin D supplementation pattern and clinical response in this community to ensure a better understanding of the link between vitamin insufficiency and this population. Third, we did not record the frequency of sun exposure, the amount of vitamin D-rich foods consumed, or outdoor exercise among the study population, all of which could have been confounding factors for vitamin D levels. Forth, there is no healthy control in our study to compare the vitamin D level.

Conclusion

The current study concluded that the Taiwanese population with IBD had a prevalence of 42.5% of vitamin D deficiency. Understanding this condition is crucial to raising patients' and doctors' awareness of the need to screen for vitamin D deficiency and enhance patient outcomes.