Abstract
Phytosterols are natural components of plant-based foods used as supplements because of their known cholesterol-lowering effect. However, their effects on lipoprotein subfractions and the quality of the LDL particle have not been studied in greater detail. We aimed to evaluate the effects of phytosterols supplements on lipids, lipoproteins subfractions, and on the quality of LDL. A prospective, pilot-type, open label, cross-over study, randomized 23 males in primary prevention of hypercholesterolemia to receive diet or diet plus phytosterol (2.6 g in 2 doses, with meals) for 12 weeks, when treatments were switched for another 12 weeks. Lipoprotein subfractions were analyzed by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gel (Lipoprint System®). The Sampson equation estimated the small and dense (sd) and large and buoyant (lb) LDL subfractions from the lipid profile. Quality of LDL particle was analyzed by Z-scan and UV–vis spectroscopy. Primary outcome was the comparison of diet vs. diet plus phytosterols. Secondary outcomes assessed differences between baseline, diet and diet plus phytosterol. Non-parametric statistics were performed with p < 0.05. There was a trend to reduction on HDL-7 (p = 0.05) in diet plus phytosterol arm, with no effects on the quality of LDL particles. Heatmap showed strong correlations (ρ > 0.7) between particle size by different methods with both interventions. Diet plus phytosterol reduced TC, increased HDL-c, and reduced IDL-B, whereas diet increased HDL7, and reduced IDL-B vs. baseline (p < 0.05, for all). Phytosterol supplementation demonstrated small beneficial effects on HDL-7 subfraction, compared with diet alone, without effects on the quality of LDL particles.
This trial is registered in Clinical Trials (NCT06127732) and can be accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the artery wall with intense oxidative process, resulting in activation of different innate cells of the immune system that are directly involved in the genesis of plaques, which are composed mainly of lipids, calcium and inflammatory cells1.
Dysfunctions in lipoprotein homeostasis are the biochemical basis for the development of atherosclerosis, with a direct relationship between ASCVD and increased plasma concentrations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), triglycerides and inverse relationship with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) concentration2,3. LDL is a causal risk factor in the pathophysiology of ASCVD, and the complex physicochemical structure of LDL impacts in generation of distinct subclasses that differ in size, density, physicochemical composition, functionality, and atherogenic potential4,5.
Although LDL-c remains the focus for lipid-lowering therapy and lifestyle modification, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) is an independent marker of ASCVD and has been included as a critical component in cardiovascular risk by both the American and European Heart Associations6,7. Low plasma concentrations of HDL-c have been associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease, and functionality aspects of HDL like antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-thrombotic properties have also been considered8,9. The ability of HDL to facilitate cholesterol efflux was inversely associated with arterial intima thickness and the presence of coronary heart disease, regardless of HDL-c concentrations10. The efflux of cholesterol from arterial intima macrophages by HDL is crucial to prevent foam cell formation and progression of atherosclerosis11.
The use of food supplements with bioactive properties appears as an additional option for achieving goals or more effective reduction of LDL-c. Among these, phytosterols compete with the absorption of intestinal cholesterol, thus reducing its plasma levels. The recommended daily intake of 2 g of phytosterols reduces cholesterol absorption by between 30 and 40%, promoting a 10% decrease in LDL-c levels12. Phytosterols are natural components of plant-based foods used as supplements because of their known cholesterol-lowering effect13. They promote positive response on lipid metabolism and can be part of adjuvant treatment of individuals with different cardiovascular risk levels. However, the impact of regular use of phytosterols on qualitative characteristics of LDL and HDL is not fully clear yet.
More recently, our group validated the Z-scan (ZS) technique to investigate quality properties of LDL in relation to the balance between oxidant and antioxidant substances in this particle14,15,16,17,18. Briefly, the physical phenomenon present in these experiments is the thermal lens (TL) formed in a solution with LDL, when it is illuminated with a Gaussian laser beam. The amplitude of the TL (\(\theta\)), in the context of the non-linear optical study of the LDL solution, is a parameter that indicates the degree of oxidative modification of LDL, where higher values of θ indicate less modified (oxidized) LDL. However, when the thermo-optical coefficient (\(dn/dT\)), where \(n\) and \(T\) are the index of refraction and the temperature, or the linear absorption (\(\alpha\)) of the sample is reduced or close to zero, the modified state of the LDL particle will be bigger19,20. In addition to the measurement of the qualitative aspects of lipoproteins subfractions, we analyzed the oxidative profile of LDL using the innovative ZS technique applied to biological system.
The aim of this pilot-type study was to evaluate the effect of phytosterol supplementation on plasma lipids, lipoproteins subfractions and the quality of LDL particle of patients with dyslipidemia in primary prevention without drug therapy.
Materials and methods
Study population
Sixty military police individuals were selected from the Rondas Ostensivas Tobias de Aguiar (ROTA), which is a troop of the General Command of the Military Police of the State of São Paulo, Brazil, with dyslipidemia in primary prevention at low or intermediate cardiovascular risk21,22, without drug therapy. Twenty-seven subjects were excluded for not fulfilling inclusion criteria and 10 dropped out for not following the study protocol. The final sample consisted of 23 individuals who completed the study (Fig. 1).
The study was conducted at the Lipids, Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology outpatient clinic, Cardiology Division, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. The ethical aspects followed the principles of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was approved by our local ethics committee (Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa da Universidade Federal de São Paulo, CAAE 678187.5.0000.5505, IRB 042778/2017), and all participants were included after signing the written informed consent form. This pilot trial is registered in Clinical Trials (NCT06127732) and can be accessed at https://clinicaltrials.gov.
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria were patients of both sexes, aged > 18 years, literate, with LDL-c ≥ 130 mg/dL and < 190 mg/dL and triglycerides < 400 mg/dL.
Subjects with secondary causes of dyslipidemia, renal (creatinine > 2 mg/dL), hepatic (AST or ALT > 1.5 ULN), or metabolic (HbA1c > 8.0%) dysfunction, with BMI < 18.5 or > 40 kg/m2, recent surgery, disabsorptive syndrome, malignancies, under lipid-lowering therapy, unable or unwilling to participate were excluded from study protocol. Those with adherence to phytosterols < 80% were also excluded.
Study design and data collection
This is a pilot-type prospective, randomized, open-label, crossover intervention study. We obtained a questionnaire with demographic data (sex, age), level of education, socioeconomic characteristics (self-reported income), smoking, personal and family history of dyslipidemia. Individuals who self-reported regular physical activity three times or more per week beyond daily activities, independent of type, duration and intensity were considered physically active. Information was also obtained on previous treatments with lipid-lowering agents. A general examination was performed with assessment of blood pressure and heart rate.
After the medical consultation, 12 h fasting blood samples were obtained (baseline). Subjects who met all the clinical and laboratory inclusion criteria were randomized and evaluated by the nutritionist.
Nutrition evaluation, diet intervention and adherence
Nutritional evaluation included anthropometric data (weight, height, and waist circumference) with calculation of body mass index (BMI, kg/m2). Nutritional status (according to criteria recommended by the World Health Organization)23 and eating habits were recorded, and we provided guidance for the adoption of a healthy diet based on the Update of the Brazilian Guideline on Dyslipidemias and Prevention of Atherosclerosis21 and the Dietary Guide for the Brazilian population24. Participants were randomized into 2 groups to receive diet or diet plus phytosterols for 12 weeks, when treatments were switched for another 12 weeks.
Diet and supplements consumption, anthropometric measures, and nutritional status, were monitored by nutritionists during visits. Phytosterols (2.6 g/day) were prescribed and supplied in 650 mg gelatin capsules, composed of phytosterol esters (β-sitosterol), to be used four capsules a day along with meals, divided into 2 meals. The phytosterols (Fitocor®) were donated by Farmoquímica, Brazil.
The adherence to interventions was based in 2 strategies: I—every four weeks, follow-up visits were carried out face-to-face and adherence to phytosterol supplementation was verified by counting empty blisters, as well as dispensing the phytosterol supplement and; II – food intake estimated by three 24 h dietary recalls25 obtained at baseline and after four and eight weeks. The diet composition was performed by the Food Processor and calculation of the estimates of dietary phytosterol consumption was based in Martins et al.26.
Biochemical analysis
The biochemical analyses of the study were performed at baseline, after diet and diet plus phytosterol. Total cholesterol (TC), HDL-c and triglycerides (TG) were analyzed by standard enzymatic method and automated procedures (Advia 2400, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). LDL-c was estimated by the Friedewald equation. Gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (TGO), glutamic pyruvic transaminase (TGP), creatine phosphokinase (CK), free thyroxin (FT4), and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) were analyzed by automated method (Advia 2400, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was detected by high-precision liquid chromatography (HPLC—Tosho G2, Tosho Inc., Tokyo, Japan). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was measured in plasma by nephelometry (Behringer nephelometer R100 Analyzer).
Lipoprotein subfractions (HDL and LDL) were analyzed by the Lipoprint system (Lipoprint System®; Quantimetrix, Redondo Beach, CA), which is based on the separation and quantification of lipoprotein subfractions by means of non-denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The subfractions identified in electrophoresis were integrated to determine the relative area of each lipoprotein subunit (percent of each subfraction) and, subsequently, multiplied by plasma TC concentration to calculate the amount of cholesterol in each LDL subfraction or by HDL-c to quantify the cholesterol concentration in each HDL subfraction. The method allowed the identification of seven LDL subfractions, with the LDL-1 and LDL-2 subfractions classified as large and the LDL-3 to LDL-7 subfractions as smaller and denser particles. For HDL, ten subfractions were identified, with HDL-1 to HDL-3 particles classified as large, HDL-4 to HDL-7 as intermediate and HDL-8 to HDL-10 as small.
Low-density lipoprotein separation
LDL was isolated by serial ultracentrifugation in 2 stages, from a sample of 14 subjects at baseline, diet and diet plus phytosterol. The first step consisted of separating the VLDL production in 4.7 PC Thick-walled tubes (HIMAC), mixing 500 µL of sample, 400 µL of KBr buffer at a density of 1,019 g/mL and 1 µL of mix (5.0 µM PMSF, 10.0 µM Benzamidine, 100.0 µM BHT, 10 µM Aprotinin)27,28,29,30, centrifuging at 105,000 × g, 4 °C for 20 h in the P50AT4 fixed-angle rotor in the HIMAC CP 70MX ultracentrifuge (Hitachi®, Tokyo, Japan) and the upper phase was discarded. Later, the LDL was obtained with a second ultracentrifugation, where the contents of the tube were mixed with the same solutions and conditions as in the first separation step, but this time using KBr buffer at a density of 1,063 g/mL and recovering the upper phase27,28. Protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) with bovine serum albumin as standard following the manufacturer's instructions.
Z-scan technique
The Z-scan technique was used, as previously reported, to measure non-linear optical properties of LDL samples14,15,16,17,18,19,20,30,31. The LDL solution sample (a low absorption medium) is encapsulated between two 1.5 cm × 2.0 cm glass microslides with a 200 μm thick Teflon spacer and is illuminated by a focused Gaussian laser beam with wavelength wave of 532 nm and power of 100 mW, propagating along the z direction. A sample converts light energy into heat and a thermal lens is formed on it. The thermal lens amplitude depends on the medium properties, such as thermo-optical coefficient, absorption coefficient and thermal conductivity. θ is a dimensional parameter that measures the amplitude of the TL formed in the LDL sample. In the Z-scan configuration, a mechanical chopper was used that provides a square pulse with a width of 30 ms, to modulate the light intensity. The transmitted light intensity is measured as a function of the z position of the sample. More details about Z-scan setup and data processing can be found in our previous works14,15,16,17,18,19,20,30,31. One can obtain the non-linear TL amplitude θ which is related to the peak-to-valley normalized transmittance as a function of the z position of the sample. As discussed before, the greater the peak-to-valley amplitude, the stronger the TL amplitude, and the less modified the LDL particle. In this study, each patient and, correspondingly, each sample had different LDL concentrations, so we normalized the values of θ to compare the results from various patients. All Z-scan experiments were performed at 37 °C.
UV–visible spectroscopy
The linear absorbance spectra of the LDL samples were measured by a UV–visible spectrophotometer, with wavelength of light from 200 to 900 nm, using deuterium and tungsten halogen light sources and a spectrometer (USB4000, by Ocean Optics). The samples were placed in quartz cuvettes, with optical path of 1 cm. Absorbance was obtained by removing the Rayleigh scattering from the extinction spectra, measured in the spectrophotometer. In this study, we investigated the absorbance values measured at the wavelength of 484 nm, corresponding to one of the absorbance peaks of carotenoids. The maximum light absorbance of other molecules present in LDL, such as ApoB-100, cholesterol, α-tocopherol and phospholipids, show absorption peaks between 200 and 300 nm32,33.
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables are presented as frequency and percentage, and continuous variables, as mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and amplitude interquartile (AIQ, Q75% – Q25%). The normality of the distribution of numerical variables was evaluated by the Shapiro–Wilk test. For the primary outcome diet and diet plus phytosterols were compared by Mann Whitmey test. For the secondary outcome (comparisons between baseline, diet and diet plus phytosterol), we used ANOVA and post Newman-Keuls test or Friedman and post Dunn test. The Sampson equation34 was employed to estimate the calculated small and dense (sd) and large and buoyant (lb) LDL subfractions from the normal lipid profile, which were compared with the values obtained by Lipoprint. Heatmaps for lipid profile, HDL, and LDL subfractions, as well as the ratios of LDL subfractions (large buoyant LDL/small dense LDL) for subjects receiving diet, and diet plus phytosterol were performed. Only variables with correlation coefficient > 0.7 are shown. Spearman correlation coefficients were used, with \(\rho\) variyng from -1 (blue color) to 1 (red color). The larger |ρ| (positive or negative), the stronger the association. All analyses were performed with the R software34. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee (Escola Paulista de Medicina – UNIFESP IRB 042778/2017; CAAE: 678187.5.0000.5505), which follows the latest Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was provided by all patients before their inclusion.
Results
Demography
Patient disposition and study protocol are presented in Fig. 1. Subjects were male, age (SD) of the participants was 42 ± 6 years, and were predominantly classified as overweight, with a mean BMI of 29 ± 1 kg/m2. The clinical and demographic characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table 1.
Primary outcome: effects of phytosterol supplementation
Anthropometric variables did not differ between diet and diet plus phytosterol (Table 2), as well as biochemistry (Table 3), including the classical lipid profile.
The distribution of HDL subfractions is presented in Table 4. There was a trend to lower levels of HDL7 subfraction (intermediate) in diet plus phytosterol [1.4 (1.1) vs. 1.8 (1.3), p = 0.05], when compared with diet. Table 5 shows the LDL, IDL, and VLDL subfractions, with no differences between diet and diet plus phytosterol.
Heatmaps showing strong correlations, with |ρ| (positive or negative) > 0.07, are presented in Fig. 2 (A and B). Of note, with diet we observed strong positive correlations (ρ > 0.07) between LDL, non-HDL-c and TC; LDL1, lbLDL, and LDL size; negative correlations between LDL3, LDL4 with LDL size; LDL3 and LDL4 with LDL1.
In the diet + phytosterol intervention, strong positive correlations were observed for lbLDL, LDL1, and LDL size; HDL8, HDL9, and HDL10 with sHDL; negative correlations between LDL size, LDL3 and LDL4.
Secondary outcome: comparisons between baseline, diet and diet plus phytosterols
Total cholesterol was lower and HDL-c higher in diet plus phytosterol vs. baseline (Supplemental Table 1); total energy intake was lower in diet and diet plus phytosterol vs. baseline (p < 0.05, for all). Diet phytosterol intake, obtained from 24-h dietary recalls was low (25 ± 18 vs. 30 ± 14 vs. 33 ± 21 mg/day), and did not differ between groups (p = 0.23) (data not shown).
Lower HDL7 was seen at baseline vs. diet (p = 0.007), IDL-B was higher at baseline, compared with diet or diet + phytosterol (p < 0.05), and there was a trend to lower sdLDL at both diet and diet + phytosterol, compared with baseline (data not shown).
Z-scan and UV–vis spectroscopy
The Z-scan and UV–vis spectroscopy are shown in Figs. 3–4. Typical Z-scan results for LDL in solution for the three groups are shown in Fig. 3A. In the 2 groups (Fig. 3B), the difference of the θ value means indicates that there was no statistically significant difference between baseline and diet or diet + phytosterol (p = 0.43). The θ values means and the linear light absorption at 532 nm showed no significant differences (p = 0.06) between baseline (0.05 ± 0.02), diet (0.06 ± 0.03) and diet + phytosterol (0.04 ± 0.02).
From the absorbance spectrum (Fig. 4A) we extracted the values at 484 nm, and a comparison between the mean values is shown in Fig. 4B. The values obtained for the absorbance of interest were not significantly different between diet or diet + phytosterol (p = 0.409). However, a strong positive correlation between θ and \({\lambda }_{484}\) was observed (r = 0.92 p < 0.0001), when all groups were considered (Supplemental Fig. 1). In Supplemental Fig. 2 we show the UV-visual spectroscopy wavelength absorbance spectrum of β-sitosterol in ethyl acetate as solvent. The spectrum at 180–400 nm corresponds to the β-sitosterol homologous molecule of cholesterol, at dilutions ranging from 0 to 2 g / mL.
Discussion
This is a pilot study addressing effects of phytosterol intervention on lipoprotein subfractions beyond the cholesterol-lowering effect. It was carried out with military police individuals selected from the ROTA, a special battalion of armed policeman that face danger every day, without time for meals, or leisure. The primary outcome comparing interventions (diet vs. diet plus phytosterol), showed no differences for anthropometric variables, classical lipid profile, or LDL subfractions. There was a trend for lower HDL7, of intermediate size, in diet + phytosterol compared with diet (p = 0.05). These dietary interventions did not affect the quality of LDL particles. We used different ways to assess lipoprotein particle size, and the heatmaps presented some strong correlations among them.
Secondary outcomes showed that phytosterol supplementation promoted small, but favorable changes in lipids and lipoproteins subfractions, including decrease in TC, and increase in HDL-c, compared with baseline. Furthermore, both interventions (diet and diet + phytosterols), reduced the atherogenic IDLB.
Guidelines such as those of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology21, and the European Society of Cardiology7, recommend a combination of dietary and lifestyle changes as a strategy to reduce the risk of ASCVD. In addition, they recommend the inclusion of phytosterols (2 g/day) to the diet in primary prevention for patients with elevated LDL-c. Phytosterols are known dietary adjuncts that lower LDL-c without producing any apparent side effects35, and are indicated for individuals with high plasma LDL-c at low or intermediate cardiovascular risk, not qualified for pharmacological treatment35,36,37.
There is an inverse relationship between the usual consumption of phytosterols in the diet and serum cholesterol or LDL-c levels. Supplementation of 2 g per day of phytosterols reduced TC and LDL-c by 8.2 and 9.3%38, but the effect of phytosterol supplementation in reducing LDL-c can be influenced by some factors, among them the time and frequency of administration, if given as a single or fractionated dose and the occasion of ingestion related to the type of meal. The best effect of supplementation is seen when administered with main meals (lunch and dinner) and divided into twice a day38. In the present study, phytosterols were added in the form of capsules along with the main meals, in 2 takes. In addition, the responsiveness to plant sterols and their bioavailability also depends on age and gender and are determined by nutrigenetic differences in metabolic factors that affect cholesterol uptake, CYP7A1 cytochrome activity, and APOE gene expression38.
Studies reveal that decreasing LDL-c and increasing HDL-c leads to a regression of atherosclerotic lesion39, although the latter has not proven event reduction. In recent decades, the cardioprotective role of HDL has been extensively investigated and directly associated with reverse cholesterol transport40. Such removal of cholesterol from the vessel wall followed by transport to the liver and excretion to the bile represents an essential biological function of HDL40.
Structural analysis and composition of the HDL particles can provide essential information for identifying HDL subfractions exhibiting specific biological functions, as well as for identifying functionally-deficient subfractions. Our findings show a trend to lower levels of intermediate HDL-7 subfraction with phytosterol supplementation, and both interventions reduced the atherogenic ILD-B subfraction compared with baseline. These subfractions of intermediate-density lipoproteins may contribute to residual cholesterol risk, as shown in the JUPITER study41, as well as seen in the phase 2 EQUATOR study, with evolocumab42. High serum concentrations of LDL-c are a risk factor for ASCVD, however, there are LDL particles in a variety of sizes that can differentially affect the progression of ASCVD43.
Smaller, denser LDL particles are considered more atherogenic and therefore a significant risk factor for ASCVD and cardiovascular events44. Atherogenic properties of small and dense LDL particles increase transport to artery wall 45,46, binding to arterial wall proteoglycans, the susceptibility to oxidation, and are absorbed by macrophages as part of the plaque-forming process47, with decreased binding to LDL receptor45,46.These findings are due to the greater affinity of the LDL receptor for larger and floating particles, while small and dense LDL particles have longer residence time in the circulation due to their lower affinity to the LDL receptor48.
As secondary outcome, both interventions showed a trend in the reduction in small and dense LDL particles. In studies such as MESA49, ARIC50, and Quebec Cardiovascular Study51 small, dense LDL particles had a higher risk of coronary heart disease. In another study, patients who experienced stroke presented smaller sizes of LDL and these small, dense LDL particles were predictors of stroke risk and stroke mortality52.
In our study, we correlated the classical lipid profile with the subfractions of LDL and HDL lipoproteins, using Lipoprint or Sampson equation, and we observed that the methods were complimentary. Reduced HDL-c levels correlate with small, dense particle size53. Increasing the HDL-c and HDL size may promote protection to ASCVD; additionally, there was correlation between triglycerides with the size of LDL (small and dense)54.
In the Z-scan and UV–vis studies, we observed that the θ value was strongly correlated with the absorption value at the 484 nm wavelength, which indicates that the greater the θ values, the absorption, and the number of carotenoids in the LDL particles are greater. This fact implies that LDL particles are more protected against oxidation as their θ values increase. None of the Z-scan and UV–vis analyses showed statistically significant differences in the quality of the LDL particles, showing no benefit, but also no harm to the functional properties of the particle. In other words, independent of other benefits of phytosterols ingestion, the quality of the LDL particles was the same in all the groups investigated. The differentiation of subfractions of non-atherogenic LDL (LDL-1 and LDL-2) and atherogenic LDL (LDL-3 to LDL-7) could not be performed using this technique.
A meta-analysis55 evaluating the effects of consumption of 1.5 to 2.0 g/day of phytosterols in hypercholesterolemia found a reduction on TC and LDL-c regardless of how phytosterols were consumed. Unlike our work, other studies that used the diet to assess the effect of phytosterols are based on administering food supplemented with phytosterols, the most common being margarines, yogurts, and cereals. Other studies with ingestion of capsule or tablet supplements with stanols or sterols of up to 1.8 mg/day showed a reduction in LDL-c, but Ottestad et al.56 using doses of 2 g/day did not encounter reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels. These findings emphasize the need to choose an appropriate dose and administration system to achieve optimal cholesterol-lowering effects.
In summary, this pilot-study, showed that phytosterol added to the diet demonstrated beneficial effects on HDL-7 subfraction, with no effect on the quality or oxidation of LDL particles. Secondary outcomes showed that both interventions reduced atherogenic IDL-B.
Study strengths and limitations
To our knowledge this study is the first assessing, by different methods, the effects of phytosterol supplementation on functional properties of HDL and LDL particles, particle size, and the oxidative status of LDL in the primary prevention setting in participants with hypercholesterolemia.
This is a pilot-type study, with a small sample size, and the findings of this study need to be confirmed with larger samples, and chance findings cannot be ruled out.
Military police from ROTA are a special battalion of armed policeman that face danger every day, without time for meals, or leisure, and the data suggests that they did not show a healthy diet compliance. In addition, they reported a very low intake of phytosterols from the diet.
Conclusions
In this pilot study, phytosterol added to the diet demonstrated small beneficial effects on HDL-7 subfraction, compared with diet alone. Both interventions reduced atherogenic IDL-B, with no effect on the quality of LDL particles.
Data availability
The analyzed database is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Libby, P. et al. Atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 5(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z (2019).
Castelli, W. P. et al. Incidence of coronary heart disease and lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Framingham Study JAMA 256(20), 2835–2838 (1986).
Neaton, J. D. & Wentworth, D. Serum cholesterol, blood pressure, cigarette smoking, and death from coronary heart disease. Overall findings and differences by age for 316,099 white men. Multiple risk factor intervention trial research group. Arch. Intern. Med. 152(1), 56–64 (1992).
Cromwell, W. C. & Barringer, T. A. Low-density lipoprotein and apolipoprotein B: Clinical use in patients with coronary heart disease. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 11(6), 468–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-009-0067-z (2009).
John, W. et al. Evaluation of serum lipoprotein and cholesterol measurements as predictors of clinical complications of atherosclerosis; Report of a cooperative study of lipoproteins and atherosclerosis. Circulation https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.14.4.689 (1956).
Grundy, S. M. et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 73(24), e285–e350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.003 (2019).
Mach, F. et al. ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 (2020).
Kajani, S., Curley, S. & McGillicuddy, F. C. Unravelling HDL-Looking beyond the cholesterol surface to the quality within. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19(7), 1971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071971 (2018).
Kontush, A. HDL-mediated mechanisms of protection in cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res. 103(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvu147 (2014).
Khera, A. V. et al. Cholesterol efflux capacity, high-density lipoprotein function, and atherosclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 364(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1001689 (2011).
Tall, A. R., Yvan-Charvet, L., Terasaka, N., Pagler, T. & Wang, N. HDL, ABC transporters, and cholesterol efflux: Implications for the treatment of atherosclerosis. Cell Metab. 7(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2008.03.001 (2008).
Katan, M. B. et al. Efficacy and safety of plant stanols and sterols in the management of blood cholesterol levels. Mayo Clin. Proc. https://doi.org/10.4065/78.8.965 (2003).
Piironen, V., Lindsay, D. G., Miettinen, T. A., Toivo, J. & Lampi, A.-M. Plant sterols: Biosynthesis, biological function and their importance to human nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agricult. 80(7), 939–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(20000515)80:7%3c939::AID-JSFA644%3e3.0.CO;2-C (2000).
Alves, S. & Figueiredo Neto, A. M. Advances in the non-linear optical investigation of lyotropic-like low-density human lipoproteins in the native and oxidised states. Liq. Cryst. 41(3), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2014.889857 (2014).
de Freitas, M. C. P. et al. Z-Scan analysis: a new method to determine the oxidative state of low-density lipoprotein and its association with multiple cardiometabolic biomarkers. Braz. J. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-015-0395-y (2016).
de Pedroso, J. F. et al. Influence of periodontal disease on cardiovascular markers in diabetes mellitus patients. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52498-7 (2019).
de Freitas, M. C. P., Martins Figueiredo Neto, A. & Damasceno, N. R. Nonlinear optical responses of oxidized low-density lipoprotein: Cutoff point for z-scan peak-valley distance. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101689 (2020).
Lotfollahi, Z. et al. Changes in lipoproteins associated with lipid-lowering and antiplatelet strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction. PLoS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273292 (2022).
Gómez, S. L. et al. Characterization of native and oxidized human low-density lipoproteins by the Z-scan technique. Chem. Phys. Lipids 132(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2004.07.001 (2004).
Gómez, S. L. et al. Cu and Fe metallic ions-mediated oxidation of low-density lipoproteins studied by NMR, TEM and Z-scan technique. Chem. Phys. Lipids 163(6), 545–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2010.03.008 (2010).
Faludi, A. A. et al. Atualização da Diretriz Brasileira de Dislipidemias e Prevenção da Aterosclerose – 2017. Arq Bras Cardiol https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20170121 (2017).
Calculadora para estratificação do risco cardiovascular. Calculadora ER2020. http://departamentos.cardiol.br/sbc-da/2015/CALCULADORAER2020/index.html.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1–253. (2000).
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de atenção básica. Guia alimentar para população brasileira. Brasiíia: Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica.; 2014. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf, (2014).
Karvetti, R. L. & Knuts, L. R. Validity of the 24-hour dietary recall. J Am Diet Assoc. 85(11), 1437–1442 (1985).
Martins, C. M. et al. Common sources and composition of phytosterols and their estimated intake by the population in the city of São Paulo. Brazil. Nutrition. 29(6), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2012.12.017 (2013).
Swinkels, D. W., Hak-Lemmers, H. L. M. & Demacker, P. N. M. Single spin density gradient ultracentrifugation method for the detection and isolation of light and heavy low density lipoprotein subfractions. J. Lipid Res. 28(10), 1233–1239 (1987).
Griffin, B. A. et al. Rapid isolation of low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions from plasma by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Atherosclerosis. 83(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(90)90131-2 (1990).
Cartolano, F. D. C., Dias, G. D., De Freitas, M. C. P., Neto, A. M. F. & Damasceno, N. R. T. Insulin resistance predicts atherogenic lipoprotein profile in nondiabetic subjects. J Diabetes Res. 2017, 1018796. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1018796 (2017).
Lotfollahi, Z. et al. Green-banana biomass consumption by diabetic patients improves plasma low-density lipoprotein particle functionality. Sci Rep. 10(1), 12269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-69288-1 (2020).
Takano, H. et al. Involvement of CarA/LitR and CRP/FNR family transcriptional regulators in light-induced carotenoid production in Thermus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 193(10), 2451–2459. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.01125-10 (2011).
Tátraaljai, D., Major, L., Földes, E. & Pukánszky, B. Study of the effect of natural antioxidants in polyethylene: Performance of β-carotene. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 102, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.02.012 (2014).
Sampson sdLDLC Equation Calculator.xlsx. Available from: https://figshare.com/articles/software/Sampson_sdLDLC_Equation_Calculator_xlsx/12888293.
R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing_. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, https://www.R-project.org/, (2023).
Rocha, M. et al. A review on the role of phytosterols: new insights into cardiovascular risk. Curr Pharm Des. 17(36), 4061–4075. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161211798764852 (2011).
Demonty, I. et al. Continuous dose-response relationship of the LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect of phytosterol intake. J Nutr. 139(2), 271–284. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.108.095125 (2009).
Trautwein, E. A., Vermeer, M. A., Hiemstra, H. & Ras, R. T. LDL-Cholesterol lowering of plant sterols and stanols-which factors influence their efficacy?. Nutrients 10(9), 1262. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10091262 (2018).
Jones, P. J. H. Inter-individual variability in response to plant sterol and stanol consumption. J. AOAC Int. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint (2014).
Nissen, S. E. et al. Effect of very high-intensity statin therapy on regression of coronary atherosclerosis: The ASTEROID trial. JAMA 295(13), 1556–1565. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.13.jpc60002 (2006).
Kontush, A. et al. Structure of HDL: Particle subclasses and molecular components. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 224, 3–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09665-0_1 (2015).
Mora, S. et al. Atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions determined by ion mobility and first cardiovascular events after random allocation to high-intensity statin or placebo: The justification for the use of statins in prevention: An intervention trial evaluating rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial. Circulation 132(23), 2220–2229. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.016857 (2015).
Baruch, A. et al. Effects of RG7652, a monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, on LDL-C, LDL-C subfractions, and inflammatory biomarkers in patients at high risk of or with established coronary heart disease (from the phase 2 EQUATOR study). Am. J. Cardiol. 119(10), 1576–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.020 (2017).
Blake, G. J., Otvos, J. D., Rifai, N. & Ridker, P. M. Low-density lipoprotein particle concentration and size as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as predictors of cardiovascular disease in women. Circulation 106(15), 1930–1937. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000033222.75187.b9 (2002).
Liou, L. & Kaptoge, S. Association of small, dense LDL-cholesterol concentration and lipoprotein particle characteristics with coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241993 (2020).
Griffin, B. A. Lipoprotein atherogenicity: An overview of current mechanisms. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 58(1), 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1079/pns19990022 (1999).
Froyen, E. The effects of fat consumption on low-density lipoprotein particle size in healthy individuals: A narrative review. Lipids Health Dis. 20(1), 86. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01501-0 (2021).
Dejager, S., Bruckert, E. & Chapman, M. J. Dense low density lipoprotein subspecies with diminished oxidative resistance predominate in combined hyperlipidemia. J. Lipid Res. 34(2), 295–308 (1993).
Pinto, L. C. S. et al. Main differences between two highly effective lipid-lowering therapies in subclasses of lipoproteins in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Lipids Health Dis. 20(1), 124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-021-01559-w (2021).
Tsai, M. Y. et al. New automated assay of small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol identifies risk of coronary heart disease: The Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 34(1), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302401 (2014).
Hoogeveen, R. C. et al. Small dense low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol concentrations predict risk for coronary heart disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC) study. Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 34(5), 1069–1077. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303284 (2014).
Lamarche, B. et al. Small, dense low-density lipoprotein particles as a predictor of the risk of ischemic heart disease in men. Prospective results from the Québec Cardiovascular Study. Circulation https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.95.1.69 (1997).
Zeljkovic, A. et al. LDL and HDL subclasses in acute ischemic stroke: Prediction of risk and short-term mortality. Atherosclerosis 210(2), 548–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.11.040 (2010).
Bredie, S. J., Kiemeney, L. A., de Haan, A. F., Demacker, P. N. & Stalenhoef, A. F. Inherited susceptibility determines the distribution of dense low-density lipoprotein subfraction profiles in familial combined hyperlipidemia. Am J Hum Genet. 58(4), 812–822 (1996).
Griffin, B. A. et al. Role of plasma triglyceride in the regulation of plasma low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfractions: Relative contribution of small, dense LDL to coronary heart disease risk. Atherosclerosis 106(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9150(94)90129-5 (1994).
De Lima, R. C., Mendonça, V. S. & Huguenin, G. V. B. Effect of phytosterols in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in adults – systematic review with meta-analysis / Efeitos dos fitoesteróis no tratamento da hipercolesterolemia em adultos—revisão sistemática com metanálise. Brazilian J Heal Rev. 4(4), 16317–16338 (2021).
Ottestad, I. et al. Phytosterol capsules and serum cholesterol in hypercholesterolemia: a randomized controlled trial. Atherosclerosis 228(2), 421–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.03.001 (2013).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the participants and also Farmoquimica, for providing phytosterol capsules.
Funding
This study was supported by grants from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq—465259/2014–6), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), the National Institute of Science and Technology of Complex Fluids (INCT-Fcx), and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP—2014/50983–3), (FAPESP—2016/24531–3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VAM, CMM, conducted clinical experiments and data treatments and prepared and revised the manuscript. ARNS performed Z-Scan and UV–vis experiments and analysed data. MCOI and FAHF designed the study and revised the manuscript. NRTD performed and analysed lipoprotein subfraction data and revised manuscript. AMFN participated in the study design, contributed financial support, and revised the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript. All authors consented to publish the results shown.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Machado, V.A., Santisteban, A.R.N., Martins, C.M. et al. Effects of phytosterol supplementation on lipoprotein subfractions and LDL particle quality. Sci Rep 14, 11108 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61897-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-61897-4
- Springer Nature Limited