Abstract
The selection pressure imposed by the host immune system impacts on hepatitis B virus (HBV) variability. This study evaluates HBV genetic diversity, nucleos(t)ide analogs resistance and HBsAg escape mutations in HBV patients under distinct selective pressures. One hundred and thirteen individuals in different phases of HBV infection were included: 13 HBeAg-positive chronic infection, 9 HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis, 47 HBeAg-negative chronic infection (ENI), 29 HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis (ENH) and 15 acute infected individuals. Samples were PCR amplified, sequenced and genetically analyzed for the overlapping POL/S genes. Most HBV carriers presented genotype A (84/113; 74.3%), subgenotype A1 (67/84; 79.7%), irrespective of group, followed by genotypes D (20/113; 17.7%), F (8/113; 7.1%) and E (1/113; 0.9%). Clinically relevant mutations in polymerase (tL180M/M204V) and in the Major Hydrophilic Region of HBsAg (sY100C, T118A/M, sM133T, sD144A and sG145R) were observed. Our findings, however, indicated that most polymorphic sites were located in the cytosolic loops (CYL1-2) and transmembrane domain 4 (TMD4) of HBsAg. Lower viral loads and higher HBV genetic diversity were observed in ENI and ENH groups (p < 0.001), suggesting that these groups are subjected to a higher selective pressure. Our results provide information on the molecular characteristics of HBV in a diverse clinical setting, and may guide future studies on the balance of HBV quasispecies at different stages of infection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a hepatotropic pathogen that indirectly causes liver disease of variable severity1. Due to the interplay between the virus and the host immune system, HBV infection may result in different clinical outcomes, ranging from acute (with or without clinical manifestations), to chronic or fulminant hepatitis2.
HBV is replicated by an error-prone polymerase through an RNA intermediate, leading its classification into 10 genotypes, several subgenotypes and diverse intra host viral variants called quasispecies3,4,5,6.
Upon transmission, distinct evolutionary events shape the architecture of the HBV quasispecies. During acute hepatitis B (AHB), both innate and adaptive immunity are triggered. In the first stages of infection, the bottleneck effect drives HBV evolution7. Under selective pressure from the immune system of a new host, HBV isolates are subjected to founder effect, selecting viral variants that are able to evade the immune pressure of this new environment, thus establishing infection8,9.
In chronic hepatitis B (CHB), HBV quasispecies balance is also a dynamic process, reflecting the interplay between HBV replication and the host immune system defense mechanisms2. Under prolonged immune pressure, viral subpopulations fluctuate over time4,7,10. Thus, in both acute and chronic infection, viral evolution is shaped by distinct immunological events, resulting in diverse outcomes6,7. CHB can be divided in five clinical phases, according to virus replication status—reflected by the presence/absence of HBeAg—and liver inflammatory disease: (i) HBeAg-positive chronic infection, (ii) HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis, (iii) HBeAg-negative chronic infection, (iv) HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis and (v) HBsAg-negative phase (HBV occult infection)2.
It has been postulated that amino acid mutations in the Major Hydrophilic Region (MHR) of the envelope gene (HBsAg) may be responsible for changes in viral antigenicity, affecting not only the immune response but also the disease outcome in patients carrying clinically relevant variants6,11. These mutations may impact on drug resistance, response to vaccination, diagnosis and may play a role in the progression to HBV-associated liver disease5,6. Moreover, substitutions in HBsAg may impair virion secretion, HBsAg formation 12,13,14 and can affect HBsAg serum levels by modulating the secretion of the surface proteins15,16,17. Inconstancies in HBsAg secretion may also have consequences in HBV detection by commercial assays14. In addition, high HBsAg genetic diversity has been observed in patients with advanced liver disease 5,18.
Despite has been demonstrated that HBV variability may impact in the natural history of HBV infection6,10,19, few studies have investigated HBV diversity under different selective pressures. The association between HBV diversity and clinical outcomes in both acute and in the different phases of chronic infection remain unclear. In this study we analyzed HBV genetic variability, drug resistance and immune escape mutations in the overlapped HBV polymerase/surface genes in HBV carriers in different stages of hepatitis B infection.
Results
Study population
One hundred and thirteen individuals in different phases of hepatitis B infection were evaluated in this study. Most of them were male (60/113; 53.1%) and overall mean age was 44.6 ± 14.4 years. Most samples were collected at baseline however, 13 individuals reported previous HBV treatment. Demographic and virological features of the 113 subjects according to HBV infection phase are stated in Table 1.
Serological tests
From acute infected individuals, 14/15 (93.3%) were anti-HBc total (+), 10/15 (66.7%) were anti-HBc IgM (+), 8/15 (53.3%) were HBeAg (+), 9/15 (60%) were anti-HBe (+). Two samples presented concurrent HBe/anti-HBe (+). No individual was positive for anti-HBs. Regarding coinfections, one sample was anti-HCV (+).
From chronically infected individuals, 95/98 (96.9%) were anti-HBc total (+), 10/98 (10.2%) were anti-HBc IgM (+), 4/98 (4.1%) were anti-HBs (+), 22/98 (22.4%) were HBeAg (+), 72/98 (73.5%) were anti-HBe (+). Five samples presented concurrent HBe/anti-HBe (+). No sample tested positive for HDV, two samples were anti-HCV (+), 9 samples tested anti-HIV (+).
Molecular tests and genotyping
Median HBV viral load was 3.320 log IU/mL (min: 2.370, max: 9.0000) for acute and 3.946 log IU/mL (min: 1.709–max: 9.500) for chronically infected subjects. Groups EPI and ENI presented, respectively, the highest and lowest viral loads (Table 2).
Four HBV genotypes were found in the sampling: HBV/A (74.3%; 84/113), HBV/D (17.7%; 20/113), HBV/E (0.9%; 1/113), and HBV/F (7.1%; 8/113). Regarding subgenotype distribution, among 84 individuals infected with HBV/A, 79.7% were classified as subgenotype A1 and 20.3% as subgenotype A2. HBV/D isolates were classified as subgenotypes D2 (20%), D3 (60%) and D4 (10%). All 8 HDV/F isolates found were classified as subgenotype F2. HBV genotype distribution according to disease phases is shown in Table 2. As expected, HBV/A1 was the most prevalent genotype irrespective of CHB phase. The ENI group had the highest number of non-A subgenotype isolates, however genotypic distribution was not statistically significant among the groups (p = 0.42). The sequences were submitted to GenBank under the accession numbers PP439846–PP439953.
Mutations
Clinically relevant mutations
Clinically relevant mutations were observed in 14 samples, 2 from acute and 12 from chronically infected individuals. The mutation sY100C in HBsAg was observed in 11 individuals, two acute and 9 chronically infected (one EPI, three EPH, two ENI and three ENH). Furthermore, at least one of the mutations sT118A/M, sM133T, sD144A and sG145Rwere observed in 6 chronically infected individuals (two ENI, two ENH and two EPI). One individual under antiviral therapy from the ENH group presented the double resistance mutation rtL180M/M204V in the RT domain of the viral polymerase.
HBV genetic variability
Genetic divergence analyzes were performed on sequences of the major genotype found in our sampling, HBV/A. In addition, coinfected patients were also excluded from this analyzes.
As presented in Fig. 1, despite hotspot regions were similar in all chronic disease phases, differences in nucleotide frequencies can be observed. Notably, CHB HBeAg (+) groups (EPI and EPH) presented lower nucleotide diversity in the first third of the sequenced fragment compared to CHB HBeAg (−) groups (ENI and ENH).
In addition to the higher genetic diversity of the POL non-overlapped region compared to S/POL overlapped region of all sequences, an overall higher frequency of nucleotide polymorphisms was observed in CHB HBeAg (−) groups (Table 2, Fig. 1). However, considering MHR region, higher genetic variability was observed in CHB HBeAg (+) groups and in patients with acute hepatitis B. These groups displayed the highest number of polymorphisms in “a” determinant (Fig. 2).
The ratio of dN/dS [nonsynonymous substitution rate (dN) divided by synonymous substitution rate (dS)] was employed to measure the selection pressure for the evolution of HBsAg and partial polymerase genes according to phases of hepatitis B infection20,21. According to Fig. 3, CHB HBeAg (−) groups were subjected to a higher selection pressure. As expected, CHB HBeAg (−) groups presented lower viral loads compared to CHB HBeAg (+) groups (p < 0.001; Fig. 3A). In contrast, CHB HBeAg (−) groups displayed higher genetic diversity, expressed by the number of nonsynonymous (NS) mutations in polymerase (p = 0.004; Fig. 3C).
In the reverse transcriptase of the polymerase gene, the positions rtN122H/L/Y, rtY126H/C, rtL129M, rtW153R, rtI163V, rtL217R, rtV253I were the most polymorphic. Regarding HBsAg, NS mutations were more frequent in the first and second cytosolic loops (CYL1—sS45L/T, sL49P/R, sS61L, sI68N/T and CYL2—sT189I,sA194V, respectively) and in transmembrane domain 4 (TMD4—sY206N, sN207S/T, sI208T, sL209V and sS210R).
Discussion
The natural history of hepatitis B infection comprises distinct phases that may reflect the viral adaptation to the host selection pressure. In most cases, HBeAg seroconversion is considered an indicative of convalescence and is used as a pivotal endpoint of therapy. HBeAg (−) status is often followed by loss or decrease of HBsAg and serum HBV DNA, denoting viral replication control22,23. Consequently, HBeAg (−) patients have a favorable prognosis and are not assumed to have overt immune-mediated liver injury11,24.
In this study, 113 HBV carriers in distinct clinical phases were analysed. We evaluated genotype distribution and the correlation between genetic diversity and phases of hepatitis B infection.
HBV/A and HBV/D, the main genotypes circulating in Brazil, were detected in all groups, and were phylogenetically related to Brazilian samples25. HBV/F was present in all but EPH group and clustered with F2 sequences from Brazil 26,27,28. HBV/E was detected in one sample from EPI group and was phylogenetically related to samples from Cape Verde29. As extensively reported, HBV/A1 was the most prevalent subgenotype in Brazil irrespective of acute or CHB phase, followed by HBV/D3 and F2 25,30,31,32,33.
To avoid the bias of genetic variability, only HBV/A samples were considered for genetic diversity analysis. In addition, once the presence of other virus may influence on the natural history of HBV, coinfected samples were also excluded.
As demonstrated in this study, higher HBV genetic diversity was observed in CHB HBeAg (−) groups when compared to HBeAg (+) groups (Fig. 3). Similar findings have been reported by other authors23,34, which suggest that individuals with higher viral variability may have a greater chance to experience spontaneous HBeAg seroconversion.
In our findings, lower viral loads and higher HBV genetic diversity were observed in HBeAg (−) individuals (Fig. 3). This trend suggests that HBV diversity may reflect the viral ability to evade the selective pressure imposed by the host immune system, although this might lead to a reduction in viral fitness. This finding agreed with other studies23,34 that assume that immune selection pressure to suppress viral replication would lead to the positive selection of escape mutants, mediated by an increased the viral diversity prior to HBeAg seroconversion.
Most studies focused on genetic variability within MHR of HBsAg, where potential binding sites for B and T lymphocytes are located35,36. In this study, clinically relevant mutations such as sY100C, sT118A/M, sM133T, sD144A and sG145R in MHR were observed in two acute and twelve chronically infected individuals. These mutations have been associated to a reduced antigenicity and immune escape37. Our findings, however, indicated that most polymorphic sites were located out of the MHR, in the CYL1-2 and TMD4. Despite CYL1 contains cysteines residues (Cys), such as Cys 48, 65 and 69, which are highly conserved among hepadnaviruses and are critical for HBsAg secretion, there are few essential amino acid residues in this domain38,39. Nonetheless, CYL1 is known to contain important T-cell epitopes (residues 28 to 51), which can be disrupted by point mutations. Regarding TMD4, it is proving to be an important domain for HBsAg stability and release from infected cells36. In this study, variations in amino acid positions s45, s49, s61, s68, s189 and s194 of CYL1-2 and s206, s207, s208, s209 and s210 of TMD4 were observed. These polymorphisms have been linked to reduced HBsAg secretion and the HBsAg/anti-HBs coexistence36,40,41.
Analyzing polymerase amino acid residues, one patient from the ENH group displayed the double resistance mutation rtL180M/M204V. In addition, substitutions in amino acids rtN122H/L/Y, rtY126H/C, rtL129M, rtW153R, rtI163V, rtL217R, rtV253I were observed in 86.7% of HBeAg (−) patients. Some of them have been described as compensatory mutations that might restore fitness in drug-resistant viral subpopulations42.
The main limitations of this study are the convenience sampling and the limited number of HBeAg (+) patients. In addition, the analysis of HBV genetic diversity in the different stages of infection could not be carried out for all genotypes, being restricted to genotype A. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study addressing the HBV genetic variability of the overlapped HBV polymerase/surface gene in Brazilian patients in different phases of hepatitis B infection. Our results provide information on the molecular characteristics of HBV in a diverse clinical setting, and may guide future studies with a broader sample size.
Further studies addressing the distinct presentations of HBV infection are needed. In particular, to investigate the dynamics of HBV genetic factors during the follow-up of chronic patients could increase our knowledge of the virus’s response mechanisms face of selective immunological and/or pharmacological pressures. A better understanding of how viral dynamics may be reflected in the evolution of liver disease might help to design improved therapeutic strategies in the future.
Material and methods
Study population
One hundred and thirteen samples from the biorepository of the Laboratory of Viral Hepatitis collected between 2011 and 2015 were enrolled in this non‐probabilistic study. Fifteen samples were from individuals with acute hepatitis B and ninety-eight from patients in different phases of chronic hepatitis B infection: 13 HBeAg-positive chronic infection (EPI), 9 HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis (EPH), 47 HBeAg-negative chronic infection (ENI), 29 HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis (ENH). All individuals are over 18 years and signed the written inform consent.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (number 661.187/CAAE 18281313.4.0000.5248). All procedures were performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2008.
Detection of HBV serological markers
Aiming to confirm the previous classification of the samples into the distinct HBV phases, serum samples were re-tested by commercial enzyme immunoassays (ELISA) for HBsAg (ETI-MAK-4, Diasorin, Italy), total anti-HBc (FTE AB COREKPLUS, Diasorin, Italy), anti-HBc IgM (TSI CORE IgMK Plus, Diasorin, Italy), anti-HBs (ETI-AB-AUK-3 Diasorin, Italy) and by electrochemiluminescence for HBeAg and anti-HBe serological markers (e411 Cobas, Roche Diagnostics, USA), according to the instructions of each manufacturer. In addition, antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), hepatitis D virus (anti-HDV) and immunodeficiency virus (anti-HIV) were tested by commercially available immunoassays (Murex Anti-HCV, DiaSorin ETI-AB-DELTAK-2 and Murex HIV Ag/Ab Combination) to evaluate co-infections.
Quantification of HBV viral load
All serum samples were submitted to the commercial assay COBAS® TaqMan HBV® Test (Roche Diagnostics, Branchburg, NJ, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions, to determine HBV viral loads.
HBV DNA extraction and amplification of S/POL region
HBV DNA was extracted from serum samples using a commercial kit (High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit, Roche Diagnostics, Mannhein, Germany) following manufacturer’s instructions. HBV genotyping and molecular characterization were performed by direct sequencing of the overlapped partial surface/polymerase (S/POL) region (~ 900base pairs) amplified by a semi-nested PCR assay using primers described by Mallory et al.43 and optimized by Villar et al.44 Wolf et al.21.
Nucleotide sequencing and sequence analyses
PCR products were purified with QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and direct nucleotide sequencing reaction was done using Big Dye Terminator kit version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with external and internal primers described by Mallory et al.43 and Kryazhimskiy and Plotkin20. Sequencing reactions were performed on ABI3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Assembly of each sequence, multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses were done in MEGA11 software45. Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed using Maximum Likelihood method with bootstrap test (1000 replicates) to assess the confidence of the output tree. Consensus sequences of each HBV isolate were submitted to a web-based tool for prediction of clinically relevant mutations (Geno2pheno [hbv] 2.0, Max-Planck-Institut für Informatik, Germany, available at http://hbv.geno2pheno.org/index.php).
Statistical analysis
Descriptive statistical analysis was performed with calculation of means and standard deviation, with a preliminary assessment using contingency tables and respective statistics. Categorical variables were compared between HBeAg (+) and (−) groups using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney U test. HBV DNA viral load correlation with genetic diversity was calculated using Pearson correlation test. p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analysis was determined using GraphPad InStat 3 (GraphPad InStat Sofware, San Diego, United States) and graphs were done using MedCalcSofware v.9.6.4.0 (MedCalc Sofware, Belgium).
To prepare the Figs. 1 and 2, the counts of nucleotides and amino acids, as well as the calculations of mutation frequencies within each group, were made using Excel spreadsheets. Graphical representations of this data were made using the R Studio platform version 3.3.0 and RStudio version 2023.12.0 + 369, using the “Esquisse” package.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the GenBank repository, under the accession numbers PP439846–PP439953.
References
World Health Organization (WHO). Hepatitis B. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b (2023).
Lampertico, P. et al. EASL 2017 clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 67, 370–398 (2017).
Kramvis, A. Genotypes and genetic variability of hepatitis B virus. Intervirology 57, 141–150 (2014).
Coffin, C. S. et al. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) variants fluctuate in paired plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells among patient cohorts during different chronic hepatitis B (CHB) disease phases. J. Viral Hepat. 22, 416–426 (2015).
Pollicino, T., Cacciola, I., Saffioti, F. & Raimondo, G. Hepatitis B virus PreS/S gene variants: Pathobiology and clinical implications. J. Hepatol. 61, 408–417 (2014).
Yang, Z.-T. et al. Characterization of full-length genomes of hepatitis B virus quasispecies in sera of patients at different phases of infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 2203–2214 (2015).
Cao, L. et al. Coexistence of hepatitis B virus quasispecies enhances viral replication and the ability to induce host antibody and cellular immune responses. J. Virol. 88, 8656–8666 (2014).
Zheng, P., Dou, Y. & Wang, Q. Immune response and treatment targets of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Innate and adaptive immunity. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13, 1206720 (2023).
Bertoletti, A. & Wang, F.-S. Overview of the special issue on HBV immunity. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 12, 253–254 (2015).
Liu, F. et al. Evolutionary patterns of hepatitis B virus quasispecies under different selective pressures: Correlation with antiviral efficacy. Gut 60, 1269–1277 (2011).
Yuen, L. et al. HBV variants are common in the ‘immune-tolerant’ phase of chronic hepatitis B. J. Viral Hepat. 27, 1061–1070 (2020).
Shizuma, T. et al. Molecular analysis of antigenicity and immunogenicity of a vaccine-induced escape mutant of hepatitis B virus. J. Gastroenterol. 38, 244–253 (2003).
Khan, N. et al. Modulation of hepatitis B virus secretion by naturally occurring mutations in the S gene. J. Virol. 78, 3262–3270 (2004).
Romani, S. et al. Characterization of the ‘a’ determinant region of the hepatitis B virus genome in Iranian patients at different clinical phases of chronic infection. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed Bench 11, 131–137 (2018).
Cavallone, D. et al. Do the circulating Pre-S/S quasispecies influence hepatitis B virus surface antigen levels in the HBeAg negative phase of HBV infection?. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther. 51, 1406–1416 (2020).
Fan, Y. Prevalence and significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) pre-S mutants in serum and liver at different replicative stages of chronic HBV infection. Hepatology 33, 277–286 (2001).
Pollicino, T. et al. Impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) preS/S genomic variability on HBV surface antigen and HBV DNA serum levels. Hepatology 56, 434–443 (2012).
Yeung, P. et al. Association of hepatitis B virus Pre-S deletions with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B. J. Infect. Dis. 203, 646–654 (2011).
Peveling-Oberhag, J. et al. Dynamics of hepatitis B virus quasispecies heterogeneity and virologic response in patients receiving low-to-moderate genetic barrier nucleoside analogs. J. Viral Hepat. 20, 234–239 (2013).
Kryazhimskiy, S. & Plotkin, J. B. The population genetics of dN/dS. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000304 (2008).
Wolf, J. B. W., Künstner, A., Nam, K., Jakobsson, M. & Ellegren, H. Nonlinear dynamics of nonsynonymous (dN) and synonymous (dS) substitution rates affects inference of selection. Genome Biol. Evol. 1, 308–319 (2009).
Liaw, Y. F. et al. Clinical and histological events preceding hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion in chronic type B hepatitis. Gastroenterology 84, 216–219 (1983).
Cheng, Y. et al. Cumulative viral evolutionary changes in chronic hepatitis B virus infection precedes hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion. Gut 62, 1347–1355 (2013).
Koffas, A. et al. Chronic hepatitis B: The demise of the ‘inactive carrier’ phase. Hepatol. Int. 15, 290–300 (2021).
Lago, B. V. et al. Genetic diversity of the hepatitis B virus subgenotypes in Brazil. Viruses 11, 860 (2019).
Cavaretto, L. et al. Epidemiological and molecular analysis of hepatitis B virus infection in manicurists in Central Brazil. J. Med. Virol. 90, 277–281 (2018).
Mello, F. C. et al. Phylogeography and evolutionary history of hepatitis B virus genotype F in Brazil. Virol. J. J10, 236 (2013).
dos Santos, M. I. M. A. et al. Mutations associated with drug resistance and prevalence of vaccine escape mutations in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection. J. Med. Virol. 89, 1811–1816 (2017).
de Pina-Araujo, I. I. M. et al. Hepatitis B virus genotypes A1, A2 and E in cape verde: Unequal distribution through the islands and association with human flows. PLoS One 13, e0192595 (2018).
Mello, F. C. et al. Hepatitis B virus genotypes circulating in Brazil: Molecular characterization of genotype F isolates. BMC Microbiol. 7, 103 (2007).
Lampe, E. et al. Nationwide overview of the distribution of hepatitis B virus genotypes in Brazil: A 1000-sample multicentre study. J. Gen. Virol. 98, 1389–1398 (2017).
Araujo, N. M., Mello, F. C. A., Yoshida, C. F. T., Niel, C. & Gomes, S. A. High proportion of subgroup A? (genotype A) among Brazilian isolates of hepatitis B virus. Arch. Virol. 149, 1383–1395 (2004).
Wolf, J. M., Simon, D. & Lunge, V. R. Hepatitis B virus genotypes in Brazil: Introduction and dissemination. Infect. Genet. Evolut. 93, 104936 (2021).
Lin, S.-R. et al. Whole genome deep sequencing analysis of viral quasispecies diversity and evolution in HBeAgseroconverters. JHEP Rep. 3, 100254 (2021).
Jung, M. C., Diepolder, H. M. & Pape, G. R. T cell recognition of hepatitis B and C viral antigens. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 24, 641–650 (1994).
Jiang, X. et al. Role of S protein transmembrane domain mutations in the development of occult hepatitis B virus infection. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 11, 2184–2196 (2022).
Liu, X., Chen, S., Liu, H. & Lou, J. Host immunity and HBV S gene mutation in HBsAg-negative HBV-infected patients. Front. Immunol. 14, 1211980 (2023).
Mangold, C. M. & Streeck, R. E. Mutational analysis of the cysteine residues in the hepatitis B virus small envelope protein. J. Virol. 67, 4588–4597 (1993).
Abou-Jaoudé, G. & Sureau, C. Entry of hepatitis delta virus requires the conserved cysteine residues of the hepatitis B virus envelope protein antigenic loop and is blocked by inhibitors of thiol-disulfide exchange. J. Virol. 81, 13057–13066 (2007).
Jiang, X., Chang, L., Yan, Y. & Wang, L. Paradoxical HBsAg and anti-HBs coexistence among chronic HBV infections: Causes and consequences. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 17, 1125–1137 (2021).
Larralde, O., Dow, B., Jarvis, L., Davidson, F. & Petrik, J. Hepatitis B escape mutants in Scottish blood donors. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 202, 207–214 (2013).
Pollicino, T. et al. Variability of reverse transcriptase and overlapping S gene in hepatitis B virus isolates from untreated and lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. Antivir. Ther. 14, 649–654 (2009).
Mallory, M. A., Page, S. R. & Hillyard, D. R. Development and validation of a hepatitis B virus DNA sequencing assay for assessment of antiviral resistance, viral genotype and surface antigen mutation status. J. Virol. Methods 177, 31–37 (2011).
Villar, L. M. et al. Update on hepatitis B and C virus diagnosis. World J. Virol. 4, 323 (2015).
Tamura, K., Stecher, G. & Kumar, S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027 (2021).
Funding
This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa Carlos Chagas (FAPERJ) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Grant number 001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, L.M.V. and M.P.; methodology, M.P. G.P.A.; P.S.F.S. and V.A.M.; validation, B.V.L. and F.C.A.M.; formal analysis, B.V.L.; B.C.L.M.; V.A.M. and V.M.M. investigation, P.S.F.S.; L.T.S.A. ; B.C.L.M. and G.P.A.; resources, L.M.V. and L.L.LX; writing—original draft preparation, B.V.L.; writing—review and editing, M.P.; F.C.A.M.; L.L.L.X; L.M.V. visualization, L.T.S.A.; V.M.M.; M.P.; supervision, L.M.V.; L.L.LX; funding acquisition, L.M.V.; L.L.LX. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lago, B.V., Portilho, M.M., Mello, V.M. et al. Genetic variability of hepatitis B virus in acute and in different phases of chronic infection in Brazil. Sci Rep 14, 10742 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60900-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60900-2
- Springer Nature Limited