Abstract
The present study was conducted to evaluate the genetic variability for morphological and qualitative traits of Coccinia for development of trait specific lines at ICAR-Central Horticultural Experiment Station (CIAH-RS), Panchmahals (Godhra), Gujarat during 2020–2022. In this study, we evaluated 26 gynoecious accessions to assess the genetic divergence through principal component and cluster analysis. The experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replications under rainfed semi-arid conditions. High values of PCV and GCV were observed for variables such as NFFP (25.13 and 22.20), PL (23.14 and 20.69), FD (24.01 and 21.46), AFW (22.98 and 20.13), NFPY (26.38 and 24.40), FYP (37.57 and 31.29), FY (35.55 and 33.20), AsC (28.65 and 27.73), Ac (24.32 and 21.06), TSS (37.23 and 35.94), DPPHL (20.71 and 20.38), FRAPL (21.08 and 20.92), TPF(20.81 and 20.45) respectively. High heritability coupled with high genetic advance as per cent of mean was observed for vine length (VL), internodal length (IL), number of female flowers per plant (NFFP), fruit length (FL), peduncle length (PL), fruit diameter (FD), average fruit weight (AFW), number of fruit per plant per year (NFPY), fruit yield per plant (FYP), fruit yield (FY), ascorbic acid (AsC), acidity (Ac), total soluble solids (TSS), total phenols in leaves TPL), total flavonoids in leaves TFL, CUPRAC in leaves (CUPRACL), DPPH in leaves (DPPHL), FRAP in leaves (FRAPL), Total phenols in fruits (TPF), Total flavonoids in fruits (TFF), CUPRAC in fruits (CUPRACF) and DPPH in fruits (DPPHF). The FYP exhibited a significant positive correlation with variables like VL (0.6833), IL (0.2991), NFFP (0.8107), FD (0.5245), AFW (0.6766), NFPY (0.7659), ASC (0.4611), TSS (0.5004) and TPF (0.4281). The estimates of genetic parameters revealed scope for further improvement of fruit yield by selection. Of the eight principal components, PC-I through PC-VIII had eigen values greater than 1 and it accounts 85.02% of the total variation for 26 gynoecious accessions of Ivy gourd. The eigen values of PC-I comprised 5.775% of total variation followed by PC-II (4.250%), PC-III (3.175%), PC-IV (2.588%), PC-V (1.828%), PC-VI (1.447%), PC-VII (1.179%) and PC-VIII (1.013%).The cluster VI and cluster I having highest mean values for most of traits under study. Thus, genotypes from the distinct cluster like cluster VI and I for should be used for selection of parents and varietal improvement for further breeding programme in ivy gourd.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Ivy gourd, Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt. [Syn. C. indica Wight and Arn., C. cordifolia (L.) Cogn.] is an underutilized perennial, fast growing, dioecious vegetable of family cucurbitaceae and is known by various names like kundru, tindoli, little gourd and scarlet gourd1,2,3. The Coccinia genus comprises 30 species confined to tropical Africa, except Coccinia grandis, which occurs wild from Senegal east to Somalia and south to Tanzania, and also in Saudi Arabia, Yemen and India. Coccinia grandis is native to India, especially the eastern regions, besides Orissa, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Maharastra and Andhra Pradesh, where a rich gene pool is available in natural forests as well as in homestead gardens due to its wider adaptability to adverse climatic conditions. The fruit is typically harvested when it is young and tender and can be cooked in a variety of ways, such as stir-frying, boiling, or pickling. Ivy gourd is a good source of vitamins, antioxidants and also contains iron, calcium and zinc2,4,5,6,7. The experimental site comes under rainfed semi-arid conditions, globally; 22.6 million square kilometers comes under semi-arid region followed by 15.7 million square kilometers of arid region. India is categorized into two zones on semi-arid climatic conditions viz. Thar Desert expands to Rajasthan, Punjab, parts of Uttar Pradesh, Kutch and Saurashtra. The another is located in the south and covers the Deccan plateau, the Coimbatore plateau and the utmost southeast region of Madras (Ramanathapuram and Tirunelveli area). The two zones are delineated by a narrow, humid region encompassing the Satpura range and the Tapti River plain (3). Its tender fruits and shoots are used for cooking and are rich sources of carbohydrates, protein, antioxidants and vitamins. It is widely used in the traditional treatment of diabetes, bronchitis, skin disorders, small pox, ring worm, scabies, ulcers, gonorrhoea, constipation, insect bites, allergy, eye infections, gonorrhoea, syphilis, liver weakness and fever and prescribed in traditional medicine for different ailments; widely used in Ayurvedic, Unani and Siddha practice in the indian subcontinent. It also has hypolipidemic, antimutagenic, hypoglycemic and anti-inflammatory activities3,6,7,8,9,10. Understanding the nutritional importance and other advantages, it is a climber that propagates vegetatively has a wide range of phylogenetic, morphological and ecological diversity. The diversity in vegetatively propagated crops might be due to the diversity of their ancestors, the diverse ecologies of the crop populations themselves and the intricate mix of selection pressures acting on the parts harvested and on the parts used by humans to make clonally propagate, resulting in complex and diverse evolutionary trajectories under domestication. The domestication of cucurbitaceous vegetable crops has involved different morphological traits including fruit shape, less bitter flesh, larger and fewer seeds, and large fruit size, resulting in high genetic diversity within and among cultivated species11. The crop plays an important role in the local diet of rural and per urban areas mainly in tribal arid, semi-arid and humid regions of India. Variability for morphological and qualitative traits including antioxidants among C. grandis germplasm are frequently used in breeding programs for developing cultivars with consumer liking is a prerequisite to efficiently manage and utilize germplasm. The PCA and clustering analysis of morphological characterization are relatively inexpensive and easy to carry out for conservation of genetic resources, identification of characters amenable to genetic improvement and selection of high yielding genotypes12. The success of good breeding and selection of promising germplasm depends on the genetic variability present in the germplasm population and the variation in the population helps to identify suitable germplasm for vital traits and conserve and classify genetic variation in the plant germplasm. As a result, the degree of genetic diversity in the base population influences the generation of high-yielding genotypes in crop improvement5,13. With the considerations mentioned above, the current study was conducted to evaluate the genetic variability for morphological and qualitative traits of Coccinia germplasm for development of trait specific lines. Further, this investigation supported in the development of two varieties namely CHESIG-2 as Thar Sadabahar and CHESIG-7 as Thar Dipti at ICAR-CIAH, Bikaner under rainfed semi-arid conditions (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4).
Materials and methods
Plant material
A set of 34 gynoecious accessions, which included three cultivars of C. grandis, were planted through stem cutting and maintained. Among these, 26 gynoecious accessions of cultivated species C. grandis were evaluated in a randomized complete block design with three replications under rainfed semi-arid conditions during 2020–2022 at Vegetable Experimental Farm, ICAR-Central Horticultural Experiment Station (CIAH RS), Panchmahals (Godhra), Gujarat (Table 1 and Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4). The average maximum and minimum temperature ranged between 28.4–46.5 °C and 12.7–26.7 °C, respectively, and total annual minimum and maximum rainfall ranged from 293.24 to 941.25 mm with relative humidity 27.55–92.50 per cent during the period under study, which is favorable for ivy gourd cultivation. However, the site’s annual water requirement or potential evapo-trasnspiration is approximately 1500 mm14. Standard cultural practices and production technology including planting, pruning, cultural practices, fertilizer application and protection measures were followed15,16,17.
Data collection and sample preparation
The evaluation for observation and determination of morphological parameters, quality traits and antioxidant potentiality was performed in three replications at the station (Tables 2, 3, 4). The flower variability (Fig. 5) was also observed. The border plants at both ends of the plots were discarded. The morphological data were recorded on eight plants selected randomly from each replication. The sample of marketable fruits and tender leaves were harvested from pest and disease free healthy plants for different observations and analysis. The samples were washed with tap water and excess water was drained. The fresh samples of fruit were used for the determination of TSS, ascorbic acid and acidity while, fresh samples of fruits and tender leaves were used for the determination of total phenols, total flavonoids, CUPRAC, DPPH and FRAP.
Determination of total soluble solids (TSS) and acidity
TSS and acidity were analyzed as suggested and described18.
Determination of ascorbic acid content
Ascorbic acid content was determined in accordance with the dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) method. Fresh sample was homogenized in mortar pestle, with 20 mL of a mixture of 6% (w/v) metaphosphoric acid in 2 mol/L acetic acid. The mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 1). The extract was titrated against dye and note the titrate value when pink colour was appeared. The value was expressed as mg/100 g fw14.
Determination of total phenolics and total flavonoids
Total phenolics were estimated using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent19. To 100 µL of the sample extract (80% ethanol) 2.9 mL of deionized water, 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent and 2.0 mL of 20% Na2CO3 solution were added. The mixture was allowed to stand for 90 min and absorption was measured at 760 nm against a reagent blank in UV–Vis spectrophotometer. Results were expressed as Gallic acid equivalent (mg GAE/100 g fw). Total flavonoids were analyzed using aluminum chloride method20. An aliquot of 1 mL of extract was added to 10 mL of volumetric flask containing 4 mL of distilled water, 0.3 mL portion of 5% NaNO2 and 0.3 mL portion of 10% AlCl3·6H2O. The mixture was allowed to stand for 6 min at room temperature. 2 mL of 1 N NaOH was added and the solution was diluted to 10 mL with distilled water. The absorbance of the solution versus a blank at 510 nm was measured immediately. The results were expressed as Catechin equivalent (mg CE/100 g fw).
Determination of antioxidant activity
The cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity and ferric reducing antioxidant potential of the fruits and leaveswere determined according to the method proposed by21,22, respectively. The FRAP reagent included 300 mM acetate buffer, pH 3.6, 10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl and 20 mM FeCl3 in the ratio 10:1:1 (v/v/v). Three ml of the FRAP reagent was mixed with 100 µL of the sample extract in a test tube and vortexed in the incubator at 37 °C for 30 min in a water bath. Reduction of ferric-tripyridyltriazine to the ferrous complex formed an intense blue colour which was measured; at a UV–vis spectrophotometer (Varian Cary 50) at 593 nm. The CUPRAC according to the protocol 0.1 mL of sample extract was mixed with 1 mL each of CuCl2 solution (1.0 × 102 mol/L), neocuproine alcoholic solution (7.5 × 103 mol/L), and NH4Ac (1 mol/L, pH 7.0) buffer solution and 1 mL of water to make the final volume 4.1 mL, After 30 min, the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm against the reagent blank. Standard curve was prepared using different concentration of Trolox. Free radical scavenging assay was assessed by the measurement of the scavenging ability of plant extract toward the stable radical DPPH23. A 3.9 mL aliquot of a 0.0634 mM of DPPH solution, in methanol (95%) was added to 0.1 mL of each extract and shaken vigorously. Change in the absorbance of the sample extract was measured at 515 nm for 30 min till the absorbance reached a steady state. The percentage inhibition of DPPH of the test sample and known solutions of Trolox were calculated by the following formula
where A0 was the beginning absorbance at 515 nm, obtained by measuring the same volume of solvent, and A was the final absorbance of the sample extract at 515 nm. Methanol (95%) was used as a blank. Results were expressed as µmol Trolox equivalent (TE)/g fw.
Statistical analysis
The data and plot analysis were carried out using various packages of Rstudio version 2023.3.0 + 386. The latest available versions of FactoMineR, factoextra, and ggplot2 were used for Principal component analysis24,25. Cluster analysis was carried out with the help of the cluster, factoextra, dendextend, and ggplot2 packages26. The variability analyzed by variability and agricolae and correlation by corrplot (46).
The collected accessions of gynoecious coccinia planted through stem cutting and maintained in field repository at ICAR-Central Horticultural Experiment Station (CIAH RS), Panchmahals (Godhra), Gujarat after following all methods in accordance with relevant guidelines of ICAR-NBPGR, New Delhi, India (http://www.nbpgr.ernet.in).
Results and discussion
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for 25 different traits in 26 coccinia gynoecious accessions were presented in Table 5 (***0.1% level of significance).
Variations among germplasms for different morphological, fruit morphometric and yield traits
The analysis of variance revealed significant variation among the 26 coccinia gynoecious accessions including released Indian varieties and breeding lines for 25 characters (Table 5). This indicated the presence of high degree of variation within the genotypes. One approach to assess variability is by examining the range of variations. Range of variation observed for all the traits in the present study (Table 6) indicated the presence of sufficient amount of variation among the genotypes for all the characters. Diversity in plant genetic resources provides the opportunity to breeders for development new and improved varieties with desirable traits, which include both farmer-preferred traits and breeder preference traits27. The results indicated that all traits differed significantly among the 26 coccinia gynoecious accessions. The longest vine length was observed in CHESIG2 (487.40 cm), while the shortest was CHESIG-13(180 cm). Internodal length ranged from 5.80 cm in CHESIG-13 to 9.50 cm in CHESIG-4. The maximum mean leaf length and width exhibited in CHESIG-11 (9.10 and 8.20 cm). These findings are in line with11,28,29,30 who also found significant differences in morphological traits of ivy gourd germplasm. The number of female flowers per plant is an important yield-contributing trait, range from 738 (CHESIG-20) to 1684 (CHESIG-6). According31, low female flower numbers reduces the productivity of ivy gourd cultivation.
A wide range of variation was observed for fruit characters. The fruit length ranged from (3.80 cm in CHESIG-16 to 7.50 cm in CHESIG-2) and fruit diameter (1.50–4.40 cm in CHESIG-13 and CHESIG-3), peduncle length (3.6 cm in CHESIG-10 to 8.2 cm in CHESIG-11). Fruit weight ranged from 11.60 g in CHESIG-16 to 28.20 g in CHESIG-2, with an average of 15.96 g. In coccinia breeding programmes, the number of fruits per plant is an important yield-contributing trait.The number of fruit per plant per year ranged from 658 in CHESIG 20 to 1570 in CHESIG 6, with a mean value of 1136.63 respectively. Coccinia CHESIG-2 genotypes had distinctly higher fruit yield 31.62 kg/plant and 26.86 t/ha more fruit than the other genotypes. In contrast, CHESIG-17 produced the lowest fruit yield of 9.28 kg/plant and 7.51 t/ha. These genotypes can be used in cocinia breeding programmes to develop cultivars with desired traits. Significant variation of fruit characters was also reported in ivy gourd4,11,28,29,30 and in cucumber 27,32.
Estimates of components of variance, heritability and genetic advance for growth, yield and quality parameters in ivy gourd were given in Table 6. Estimate of phenotypic coefficients of variation (PCV) ranged between 8.46% for leaf length to 37.57% for fruit yield per plant and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) ranged between 6.71% for LW and 35.94% for TSS (Table 6). High PCV and GCV were recorded for NFFP (25.13 and 22.20), PL (23.14 and 20.69), FD (24.01 and 21.46), AFW (22.98 and 20.13), NFPY (26.38 and 24.40), FYP (37.57 and 31.29), FY (35.55 and 33.20), AsC (28.65 and 27.73), Ac (24.32 and 21.06), TSS (37.23 and 35.94), DPPHL (20.71 and 20.38), FRAPL (21.08 and 20.92), TPF (20.81 and 20.45) respectively. whereas, high PCV and moderate GCV was observed in VL(21.25 and 18.04) and FL(20.46 and 17.71). The presence of high variability within the genotypes offers better scope for improvement through selection. These results indicating maximum amount of variability present in the germplasm for these characters. PCV is slightly higher than GCV for most of traits under study, indicating less environmental influence. Similar results were given in ivy gourd4,11,29,30. Moderate PCV and GCV were recorded for the characters like IL (15.08 and 14.75), TPL (18.33 and 17.47), TFL (19.68 and 18.89), CUPRACL (18.53 and 18.31), CUPRACF (21.08 and 20.92), TFF (18.28 and 18.06), DPPHF (12.27 and 11.62). These results explain the existence of limited variability or low genetic variability in the germplasm evaluated for the trait. This necessitates need for generation of new variability for these characters. Low PCV and GCV was recorded for LL (8.46 and 7.89), LW (9.03 and 6.71), and FRAPF (8.55 and 8.29) which Indicates the existence of limited variability or low genetic variability in the germplasm evaluated for these traits and selection based on these traits would be ineffective33,34. Genetic variability in terms of PCV and GCV were high for yield per plant (27.56 and 23.87%, respectively). High heritability in broad sense combined with high genetic advance was recorded for number of fruits per plant (94.39 and 38.57%) followed by fruit weight (93.36 and 32.61%) are the indicative of preponderance of additive and additive × additive type of gene interaction in C. Grandis 33. Similarly in cucumber, the highest estimates (> 20%) of PCV and GCV were observed for the internode distance, average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant, and yield per plant, indicating a wide range of variations27.
The dominance of selection for any trait depends not only on the amount of phenotypic and genotypic variability but also on estimates of broad sense heritability. High heritability in capacious sense is effective in elucidating desirable trait for selection and enables the breeder to select superior genotypes on the basis of phenotypic expression of quantitative traits4,13,30,35. In the present investigation, high heritability was recorded for all traits. FRAPL exhibited highest broad heritability (99%) followed by CUPRACL (98%), DPPHL and TPF (97%), IL as well as TFL (96%). It alluding that these traits are less influenced by environmental factors and are under the control of additive gene effect and identification for advancement of such traits would be rewarding. Heritability estimates in confluence with genetic enhancements are more dominant and reliable in predicting the advancement through selection36. So far as the units of measurements influence the magnitude of genetic advance (GA), the GA as per cent of mean is contemplated as an imperious selection parameter. Genetic advance as per cent mean (GAM) is highest for most of the traits except LL, LW and FRAPF. High heritability results in cucumber for different traits like vine length (94.41%), internodes distance (92.07%), the number of primary branches plant−1 (84.17%), fruit weight (93.99%), fruit length (87.61%), number of fruits plant−1 (84.88%), and yield plant−1 (89.9%) were observed27. High heritability associated with high Genetic advance as per cent mean was observed for VL, IL, NFFP, FL, PL, FD, AFW, NFPY,FYP, FY, AsC, Ac, TSS, TPL, TFL, CUPRACL, DPPHL FRAPL, TPF, TFF, CUPRACF, DPPHF, CUPRACF and DPPHF indicated additive gene action, making selection for this trait will be more efficacious36,37. High heritability along with low GAM was recorded for LL, LW and FRAPF due to non-additive gene action and direct selection for these parameters will be less efficacious. The similar results were recorded by4 in ivy gourd and spine gourd38.
The genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients were worked out for 25 morphological, yield and fruit quality characters of the 26 coccinia germplasm (Table 7 and Fig. 6). It was evident from the table that the values of genotypic correlation coefficient were greater than the values of phenotypic correlation co efficient for most of the characters, which indicate a strong inherent association between various traits. In phenotypic correlation (Table 7), fruit yield per plant showed significant positive correlation with VL (0.2426), IL (0.2639), NFFP (0.6338), FD (0.3077), AFW (0.7452), NFPY (0.795), ASC (0.2636), TSS (0.2819), TPF(0.2892). Whereas, fruit yield per plant showed phenotypic negative correlation with PL (− 0.0192), Ac (− 0.0975), DPPHL (− 0.1968), FRAPL (− 0.0975) and (0.0053). Similar findings were reported by4,5,8,11,13,30,38. In genotypic level (Table 6), fruit yield per plant showed significant positive correlation with VL (0.6833), IL (0.2991), NFFP (0.8107), FD (0.5245), AFW (0.6766), NFPY (0.7659), ASC (0.4611), TSS (0.5004), TPF(0.4281).Whereas, fruit yield per plant showed genotypic negative correlation with DPPHL (-0.2084). In line with our findings, the phenotypic correlation studies in cucumber showed that fruit yield plant−1 exhibited a positive and significant correlation with fruits plant−1, fruit length, fruit weight, fruit width, branches plant−1 and plant height 10. Many researchers reported in earlier findings that leaves are important trait for plants photosynthetic performance, architecture and yield potential, thus, a good trait to be targeted for breeding programme for development and selection of targeted trait variety12. The characters like showed high positive correlation both in phenotypic as well as genotypic level, which indicating that there was simultaneous selection for these characters might bring an improvement in fruit yield of plant. Similar results were reported by4,5,38,39,40,41.
Principal component analysis (PCA)
The present study explains the PCA of 26 coccinia gynoecious accessions with 25 growth and yield as well quality parameters comprises the eight eigen values. The eigen values and their percent variation were presented (Tables 8, 9 and Figs. 7, 8, 9) Eigen value and variance connected with each PC gradually decreases but cumulative variability gradually increases (Table 8 and Fig. 7). The present study, eight PC-I to PC-VIII having eigen values greater than one and it comprises 85.02% of the total variation for 26 coccinia gynoecious accessions. The components and their eigen values accounts greater than one are considered as principal components (Major components), which are responsible for higher magnitude of variance.
The components with eigen values larger than one are considered as principal components or significant components since they account for a large proportion of the variance. Plant breeders typically pick such components for plant selection. Considering of such components will be more useful in the plant selection and further improvement of coccinia11,13. The eigen values of PC-I was comprised approximately 23.0984% of total variation followed by PC-II (16.999%), PC-III (12.699), PC-IV (10.351%), PC-V (7.313%), PC-VI (5.787%), PC-VII (4.714%) and PC-VIII (4.051%). It indicates that, presence of appreciable diversity among the genotypes for the characters under study. More or less similar results were recorded by4,35,40,41,42,43. The characters contribution towards the principal components for twenty five growth, yield and quality parameters were given in Table 9 and Figs. 8 and 9. The most of characters were positively contributed to the PC-I which are VL (0.466), IL (0.386), LW(0.074), NFFP (0.681), FL (0.065), FD (0.572), AFW (0.511), NFPY (0.696), FYP (0.814), FY (0.810), AsC (0.313), Ac (0.051), TSS (0.286), TPL (0.411), TFL (0.425), CUPRACL (0.577), FRAPL(0.310), TPF (0.552), TFF(0.505), CUPRACF (0.545), DPPHF (0.526) and FRAPF (0.639).Whereas character like LL (− 0.061), PL (− 0.178) and DPPHL (− 0.062) contributed negatively. This reveals that PC-I contributed the large amount (23.098%) of variability through its growth, yield and yield attributing and quality traits. Similarly in cucumber, the first five PCs showed an eigen value of 1 and above with 71.51% cumulative variance. Among these, the first two PCs accounted 43.92% cumulative variance and they were highly associated with the days to a male flower, days to a female flower, the number of nodes at the first female flower, the first fruit harvest, fruit length, fruit width, fruit weight, and the number of fruits per plant in cucumber27. Likewise in another study by11 in Coccinia, first three PCs accounted for 50% of the total variance and differences among the accessions were evidenced principally in relation to fruit traits such as fruit weight, fruit length and the number of seeds in each fruit. The main characters positively contributed to the PC-II were VL (0.350), IL (0.458), LL (0.769), LW (0.727), NFFP (0.113), FL (0.156), PL (0.613), FD (0.280), AFW (0.448), NFPY (0.166), FYP (0.390), FY (0.373) and TSS (0.065) were responsible for 18.24% of total variability. Whereas, all the quality parameters like, AsC (− 0.038), Ac (− 0.263), TPL (− 0.422), TFL (− 0.123), CUPRACL (− 0.579), DPPHL (− 0.670), FRAPL (− 0.568), TPF (− 0.315), TFF (− 0.082), CUPRACF (− 0.287), DPPHF (− 0.389) and FRAPF (− 0.267) contributed negatively to this component. IL (0.411), LL (0.165), LW (0.109), FL (0.463), Pl (0.114), FD (0.344), TPL (0.411), TFL (0.629), TFF (0.474), CUPRACF (0.639) and FRAPF (0.346) were major traits contributes positively for variation (12.699%) in the PC-III, while NFFP (− 0.537), NFPY(− 0.538), FYP (− 0.339), FY(− 0.352), AsC (− 0.414), Ac (− 0.104), TSS (− 0.432), DPPHL (− 0.182), FRAPL (− 0.141) and DPPHF (− 0.202) were negatively contributed. The major characters contributes positively for variation(10.351%) towards PC-IV were VL (0.433), FL (0.615), AFW (0.671), FYP (0.157), FY (0.191), AsC (0.468), Ac (0.582), TSS (0.140), TPL (0.186), CUPRACL (0.110), DPPHL (0.273) and TFF (0.107), while IL (− 0.188), LL (− 0.120), LW (− 0.112), NFFP (− 0.385), TFL (− 0.344), DPPHF (− 0.372) and FRAPF (− 0.335) were negatively contributed. Similar results were obtained by13 who studied morphological diversity of wild genetic resources of alfalfa and detected that the first PC explained 56.4% of the total variability in the measured traits and was associated with biomass production, which is congruent with our results. The PC-V is responsible for 7.313% of total variability through major characters positively contributed to this component were LL (0.458), LW (0.579), AsC (0.412), Ac (0.238), CUPRACL (0.288), DPPHL (0.140), FRAPL (0.562), TFF (0.245) and DPPHF (0.295) Whereas, FL (− 0.186), PL (− 0.191), NFPY (− 0.173), FYP (− 0.113), FY (− 0.137), TSS (− 0.216) TPL (− 0.354), TPF (− 0.331) and CUPRACF (− 0.199) were contributed negatively to this component. The major characters positively contributes for variation (5.787%) towards PC-VI were VL (0.225), IL (0.176), LL (0.272), LW(0.196), PL (0.198), Ac (0.380), TPL (0.416), TFL (0.346), DPPHL (0.263), FRAPL (0.150) and DPPHF (0.136), while the negatively contributed traits in this component were FL (− 0.188), FD (− 0.125), AsC (− 0.278), CUPRACL (− 0.122) TFF (− 0.363), CUPRACF (− 0.159) and FRAPF (− 0.359). In PC-VII, the major traits positively contributed (4.714%) to the total variability were IL (0.198), FL (0.319), PL (0.109), TSS (0.614), TFL (0.106), FRAPL (0.115), TFF (0.310), DPPHF (0.208) and negatively contributed traits were VL (− 0.206), FD (− 0.470), Ac (− 0.380) and FRAPF (− 0.213). The PC-VIII contributes only 4.05%.of total variability and the major characters responsible for this component were IL (0.185), FL (0.289), PL (0.556), AsC (0.433), FRAPL (0.112), CUPRACF (0.121) and DPPHF (0.228) whereas, negatively contributed traits were VL (− 0.105), LL (− 0.154), LW (− 0.151), TSS (− 0.362), DPPHL (− 0.102) and TFF (− 0.283). Character contributed positively towards PC-I to PC- VIII are important because their contribution is more than 85.02% of total variability.
The Similar, first two PCs accounted 81.27% of the total variation among for 38 brinjal lines for different traits44. The PCA revealed higher contribution for variation mainly comes from the characters like VL, NFFP, FL, FD, AFW, NFPY, AsC and TSS. These results were in line with the findings13,35,38,40,41,42.
Cluster mean analysis
Cluster mean analysis for twenty five traits in 26 ivy gourd accession for growth, yield and quality parameters were given in Table 2. The cluster composition of twenty six ivy gourd genotypes in to six clusters were also worked out (Table 3 and Figs. 10, 11). Clusters means analysis shows a wider variation among the growth and yield related parameters (Table 2) which could be due to different unique characteristics (Table 4). The neighbor-joining dendrogram is a tool for explaining objects, which has been widely used as an effective tool to discover the structural associations among tested accesions and provides a hierarchical classification of them. The higher mean values for VL (4.428) was observed in cluster VI followed by cluster I (349.6), while, lower cluster mean value was observed in cluster I I (294.150), The high cluster mean for IL was observed in cluster I (8.300) followed by cluster III (7.750), while the lowest was observed in cluster V (6.450). The LL has higher mean values in the cluster III (8.40) and clusters VI (8.30) whereas, low values in cluster (V). Highest cluster mean for LW was noticed in cluster VI (7.80) followed by cluster III (7.725) and lowest values in cluster V (6.525). The NFFP had the highest mean values in cluster II (1621.33) followed by cluster V (1453.75) while, the lowest in cluster IV (941.60). The high cluster mean for FL was recorded in cluster VI (6.350) and cluster I (6.100) with low mean in cluster II (4.533). The similar trend in cluster analysis bitter gourd genotypes for different traits showed that the line PDMGy 201 was distinct from the rest of the three genotypes in cluster I, which could be due to its unique characteristics, like gynoecious reproduction, and its superiority for earliness traits like the number of days until the first female flower appearance and the number of days until the first fruit is harvested35.
The maximum cluster mean for PL was recorded in cluster III (7.325) followed by cluster I (6.033), and minimum was recorded in cluster II (5.033).The FD has got high cluster mean values in cluster I (3.067) followed by cluster VI (2.800) while, low values in cluster IV (2.220).The AFW recorded the highest cluster mean values in cluster VI (24.750) followed by cluster I (18.330) and the lowest was recorded in cluster III (14.225). The high cluster mean values for NFPY was observed in cluster II (1465.667) and cluster V (1390.750) while, low value in cluster IV (844.700).The trait FYP got highest cluster mean value in cluster VI and II (31.418 and 22.899), whereas, low values in cluster IV (12.406). The higher mean values for FY (26.090) were observed in cluster VI followed by cluster II (18.265) and lower values in cluster I V (10.084). In line with these results, 103 landraces of cucumber grouped in six clusters and cluster III with landraces AC-14, AC-97, AC-471, AC-451, and RAI-209 were found more divergent for average fruit weight, fruit length, and fruit width, while cluster IV with landraces AC-201, TT-161, RAI- 217, RAI-215, and TRMR-103 were found more divergent for improving average vine length, internodes length, the number of primary branches plant−1, the number of fruits plant−1, and yield plant−127. In general, the intra cluster distance shows lower values than the inter cluster distances. Therefore, the genotypes accounts within a cluster group were less divergent from one another. It is desirable to select genotypes from cluster showing high inter cluster distance as it indicates the wider genetic diversity present in the genotypes11. Thus, these diverse lines may be used in the future improvement programme in the coccinia forndevelopment and selection of improved variety.
Quality parameters
The cluster I has highest cluster mean values in the traits like TPL (22.453), TFL (11.313), CUPRACL (32.840), TPF (14.338), TFF (7.080), CUPRACF (24.320), DPPHF (21.246) and FRAPF (29.197) and lower values in AsC (25.940). Polyphenolic and flavonoid compounds are the chemical structure contains multiple hydroxyl substituent’s on an aromatic ring. Due to their structure, polyphenol compounds are good electron and proton donors. They are capable to scavenge free radicals and reduce oxidative stress by transferring H-atom from their hydroxyl group(s) to free radicals45. The cluster II exhibited high mean values for AsC (47.287), TFL (9.250), CUPRACL (36.899), FRAPL (41.536), CUPRACF (20.330), DPPHF (23.683)) and FRAPF (29.644). The cluster III shown lowest cluster mean values for most of the quality parameters under study like, Ac (0.083), TPL (13.308), CUPRACL (23.462), DPPHL (14.293), FRAPL (27.314), CUPRACF (17.293) and FRAPF (25.011). The cluster IV exhibited higher mean value for Ac (0.125), DPPHL (19.422) and lower values for TSS (1.560) and TPF (10.593). The cluster V has highest cluster mean values in TSS (2.125), TPL (19.633), DPPHL (20.883), FRAPL (30.458), TPF (13.810) and lower values for TFF (4.5528).The cluster VI exhibited higher cluster mean values for AsC (47.325), Ac (0.137), TSS (2.60) and TFF (6.615) whereas, lower values for TFL (6.540) and DPPHF (18.047). In previous studies of Coccinia (41) reported polyphenolic content of 104:88 ± 0:8 mg GAE equivalent per gram of leaf extract and flavonoids content of 35:35 ± 1:82 mg QE equivalent per gram of leaf extract. The accessions with higher mean values are having great scope while selecting the genotypes for further improvement in ivy gourd. The cluster VI and cluster I shown the valuable characters for attaining high fruit yield as well as quality in ivy gourd. The cluster VI has higher mean values for most of the traits viz.,VL, LL, LW, FL, FD, AFW, FYP, FY, AsC, Ac, TSS and TFF. Meanwhile, cluster I was found superior for VL, IL, FL, PL, FD, AFW, TPL, TFL, CUPRACL, TPF, TFF, CUPRACF, DPPHF and FRAPF. Thus, genotypes from the distinct cluster like cluster VI and I should be used for selection of parents and varietal improvement for further breeding programme in ivy gourd. The similar trend was presented by4,5,11,13,30,35,38,39,41,43. In fact, these researchers have compared their data with previously published database or literature which might have different genotype. Among the antioxidants, particularly ascorbic acid is thermolabile in nature and many of the vegetable at mature stages are generally consumed after cooking, the human body is unable to harness the benefits of ascorbic acid. On the other hand, the human body can fully access the ascorbic acid present in coccinia fruits by consuming it as fresh or table purpose14.
Conclusion
Range of variation observed for all the traits which indicate the presence of sufficient amount of variation among the genotypes for all the characters. High heritability coupled with high Genetic advance as per cent meanwas observed for VL, IL, NFFP, FL, PL, FD, AFW, NFPY,FYP, FY, AsC, Ac, TSS, TPL, TFL, CUPRACL, DPPHL, FRAPL, TPF, TFF, CUPRACF, DPPHF, CUPRACF and DPPHF indicated additive gene action, making selection for this trait will be more effective. Most of the characters showed high positive correlation both in phenotypic as well as genotypic level, which indicating that there was simultaneous selection for these characters might bring an improvement in fruit yield of plant. Eight principal components PC-I to PC-VIII having eigen values greater than one and it comprises 85.02% of the total variation. The PCA revealed higher contribution for variation mainly comes from the characters like VL, NFFP, FL, FD, AFW, NFPY, AsC and TSS. The cluster VI and cluster I shown the valuable characters for attaining high fruit yield as well as quality in ivy gourd. The cluster VI has higher mean values for most of the traits viz.,VL, LL, LW, FL, FD, AFW, FYP, FY, AsC, Ac, TSS and TFF. Meanwhile, cluster I was found superior for VL, IL, FL, PL, FD, AFW, TPL, TFL, CUPRACL, TPF, TFF, CUPRACF, DPPHF and FRAPF. These results are based on 25 important traits to assess the 26 gynoecious accessions of coccinia for selection of trait specific lines in the present experiment which will be helpful in enhancing the productivity and availability to the consumer’s along with the exploitation of natural genetic variation existing in the available germplasm. Thus, genotypes from the distinct cluster should be used for selection of parents and varietal improvement for further breeding programme in ivy gourd.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Saikia, J., Phookan, D. & Talukdar, P. Studies on genetic variability in ivy gourd [Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt.]. Indian J. Horticult. 74(01), 139–141. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0112.2017.000031.7 (2017).
Sarkar, T. et al. Quality Assessment of tindora (Coccinia indica) using poincare plot and cartesian quadrant analysis. Food Anal. Methods 15, 2357–2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-022-02287-2 (2022).
Holstein, N. Monograph of Coccinia (Cucurbitaceae). PhytoKeys 54, 1–166. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.54.3285 (2015).
Bharathi, L. K., Naik, G. & Nath, V. Selection indices for parthenocarpic clones of ivy gourd (Coccinia grandis). Indian J. Agric. Sci. 78, 905–908 (2008).
Teshome, Z., Terfa, M. T., Tesfaye, B., Shiferaw, E. & Olango, T. M. Genetic diversity in anchote (Coccinia abyssinica (Lam.) Cogn) using microsatellite markers. Curr. Plant Biol. 24, 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100167 (2020).
Vinothkumar, G., Venkataraman, P., Vinodhini, V. M., Lavanya, R. & Sathishkumar, D. Effect of Coccinia indica leaf extract on angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor induced hepatotoxicity in wistar albino rats. Clin. Nutr. Exp. 24, 24–33 (2019).
Kondhare, D. & Lade, H. Phytochemical profile, aldose reductase inhibitory, and antioxidant activities of Indian traditional medicinal Coccinia grandis (L.) fruit extract. 3 Biotech 7, 378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-1013-1 (2017).
Meenatchi, P., Purushothaman, A. & Maneemegalai, S. Antioxidant, antiglycation and insulinotrophic properties of . (L) in vitro: Possible role in prevention of diabetic complications. J. Trad. Complement. Med. 2016, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2016.01.002 (2016).
Khatun, S., Pervin, F., Karim, M. R., Ashraduzzaman, M. & Rosma, A. Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of Coccinia cordifolia L. plant. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 25(4), 757–761 (2012).
Astiti, M. A. et al. LC-QTOF-MS/MS based molecular networking approach for the isolation of α-glucosidase inhibitors and virucidal agents from Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt. Foods 10, 3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10123041 (2021).
Shaina, T. J. & Beevy, S. S. Morphological variation and evolutionary significance of coccinia grandis (l.) Voigt: An under-exploited cucurbitaceous vegetable crop. Plant Syst. Evol. 298(3), 653–59 (2012). http://www.jstor.org/stable/43496775.
Bouargalne, Y. et al. Genetic diversity for agromorphological traits, phytochemical profile, and antioxidant activity in Moroccan sorghum ecotypes. Sci. Rep. 12, 5895. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09810-9 (2022).
Sayed, M. R. I. et al. Genetic diversity, analysis of some agro-morphological and quality traits and utilization of plant resources of Alfalfa. Genes 13, 1521. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13091521 (2022).
Yadav, L. P., Gangdhara, K. & Apparao, V. V. Evaluation of drumstick variety Thar Harsha under rainfed semi-arid conditions for growth, yield and quality along with antioxidant potentiality and nutrient content. S. Afr. J. Bot. 148, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2022.04.005 (2022).
Yadav, L. P., Gangadhara, K. & Singh, S. Kundru: Adiwsasi kissano ke swasthya avam poshan ka aadhar (Hindi). Rajasthan Pratap Kheti 2019, 1 (2019).
Yadav, L. P., Gangadhara, K., Singh, S. & Saroj, P. L. Arddhashushk kshetron mein kundaru ki kheti (Hindi) Maru Bagwani Rajbhasha Patrika, ICAR-CIAH, Bikaner, Rajasthan. Rajasthan Pratap Kheti 13, 48–51 (2019).
Yadav, L. P., Gangadhara, K. & Sing, S. Ardha Shushk Kshetro Me Kundru Ka Pravardhan va Kheti (Hindi). In Shushka Kshetriya sabjiyo ka Beejotpadan (Hindi) (eds. Chudary, B. R. et al.) 1–143 (ICAR-CIAH, 2018).
AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 17 Edn, Washingaton D.C. (2000).
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R. & Lamuela-Ranventos, R. M. Analysis of total phenols other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Method Enzymol. 299, 152–178 (1999).
Zhishen, J., Mengcheng, T. & Jianming, W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 64, 555–559 (1999).
Apak, R., Guclu, K., Ozyurek, M. & Celik, S. E. Mechanism of antioxidant capacity assays and the CUPRAC (cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity) assay. Microchim. Acta. 160, 413–419 (2008).
Benzie, I. F. F. & Strain, J. J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP assay. Anal. Biochem. 239, 70–76 (1996).
Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E. & Berset, C. Use of free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. Lebensm Wiss. Technol 28, 25–30 (1995).
Hotelling, H. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J. Educ. Psychol. 24, 417–441 (1933).
Pearson, K. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos. Mag. Ser. 2(11), 559–572 (1901).
Sokal, R. R. & Michener, C. D. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull. 28, 1409–1438 (1958).
Ahmed, I. et al. A study on the phenotypic variation of 103 cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) landraces for the development of desirable cultivars suitable for the changing climate. Life 12, 1235. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081235 (2022).
Nag, H., Singh, D., Bahadur, V. & Collis, J. P. Evaluation of ivy gourd (Coccinia cordifolia l.) genotypes in allahabad agro-climatic condition. HortFlora Res. Spect. 1, 259–262 (2012).
Jha, B. & Jha, M. Studies on variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield contributing characters in Ivy gourd (Coccinia grandis (Voigt.). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 9(2), 1682–1685 (2020).
Tak, J. K. et al. Genetic variability analysis in local germplasm of ivy gourd (Coccinia grandis L.) in Southern Rajasthan conditions. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 39(15), 104–111 (2020).
Johnson, H. Fruit set problems in squash, melons, and cucumbers in home gardens, Cooperative Extension. In Division of Agricultural Sciences, Leaflet 21242, University of California 1–2 (2008).
Zhang, J. et al. The formation of fruit quality in Cucumis sativus L.. Front. Plant Sci. 23, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.729448 (2021).
Saikia, J. & Phookan, D. B. Evaluation of ivy gourd (Coccinia Grandis L. Voigt) genotypes in NE region of India. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 10(6), 5642–5644 (2018).
Wondimu, T., Alamerew, S., Ayana, A. & Gredew, W. Variability and association of quantitative traits of anchote (Coccinia abyssinica (Lam.) Cogn.) in Ethiopia. Int. J. Plant Breed. Genet. 8, 1–12 (2014).
Alhariri, A. et al. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) using morphological and SSR markers. Plants 2021, 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10091860 (1860).
Johnson, H. W., Robinson, H. E. & Comstock, R. E. Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agron. J. 47, 314–318 (1955).
Panse, V. G. Genetics of quantitative characters in relation to plant breeding. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed. 17, 318–329 (1957).
Bharathi, L. K., Naik, G., Singh, H. S. & Dora, D. K. Studies on genetic variability in spine gourd. Indian J. Hortic. 63(1), 96–97 (2006).
Behera, T. K., Gaikwad, A. B., Saxena, S., Bharadwaj, C. & Munshi, A. D. Morphological and molecular analyses define the genetic diversity of Asian bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6, 261–267 (2012).
Kumar, S. et al. Morphological and molecular diversity analysis in bitter gourd. Pharma Innov. 9, 94–100 (2020).
Aleem, S. et al. Principal component and cluster analyses as a tool in the assessment of genetic diversity for late season cauliflower genotypes. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 34(1), 176–183. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjar/2021/34.1.176.183 (2021).
Gemede, H. F., Merga, W., Dufera, M. & Serbessa, B. Nutritional and phenolic profiles of leaves of fifteen Anchote (Coccinia abyssinica) accessions. Cogent Food Agric. 7(1), 1911031. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2021.1911031 (2021).
Parmar, A. et al. Nutritional comparison of white and red Coccinia abyssinica (lam.) cong. accessions: An under-utilised edible tuber of the ethiopian highlands. Foods 6, 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6080071 (2017).
Uddin, M. S. et al. Evaluation of 130 eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) genotypes for future breeding program based on qualitative and quantitative traits, and various genetic parameters. Horticulturae 7, 376. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7100376 (2021).
Namchaiw, P. et al. The leaf extract of Coccinia grandis (L.) Voigt accelerated in vitro wound healing by reducing oxidative stress injury. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longevity 3963510, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3963510 (2021).
Posit team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.posit.co/ (2023).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Director and Head, ICAR-Central Institute of Arid Horticulture, Central Horticultural Experiment Station, Godhra, India for providing the necessary facilities for carrying out this experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization, LPY; Conceptualization, writing—review and editing, GK; VVA; writing—review and editing, AKS; VY; DSM; JR; JP; RK; AKV; NS; data curation, software, PK; SK; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yadav, L.P., Gangadhara, K., Apparao, V.V. et al. Genetic diversity, morphological traits, quality traits and antioxidants potentiality of Coccinia grandis germplasm under rainfed semi-arid region. Sci Rep 14, 868 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49091-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-49091-4
- Springer Nature Limited