Abstract
The growing need for renewable and environmentally friendly sources of energy has motivated a lot of researchers to direct their efforts to meet these challenges. The use of renewable additives to gasoline, such as ethanol and methanol, has been a successful solution. However, blending ethanol into gasoline has some drawbacks, including increased gasoline volatility and significant changes in the distillation curve. This study investigated the effects of blending the eco-friendly dimethyl carbonate (DMC) with various concentrations into ethanol-gasoline fuel blend (E10) on some volatility parameters and octane number, which have not been previously reported in the literature. The fuel samples were formulated by mixing E10 with (0.0%, 2.0%, 4.0%, 6.0%, 8.0%, and 10.0%) of dimethyl carbonate. The main properties of the fuel samples were measured such as distillation curve, and octane number. The distillation process was carried out in accordance with ASTM-D86 while vapor pressure was measured in accordance with ASTM-D5191. The obtained results revealed interesting outcomes that may spark the interest of refineries in this promising fuel additive. Addition of DMC to gasoline-ethanol blend was found to have insignificant impact on the volatility of fuel. The results demonstrate that addition of ethanol to gasoline causes a significant decrease in T50 by about 20 °C, while addition of 10 volume percent of DMC to E10 causes an increase in T50 by about 2 °C. The obtained results showed also that the addition of 10 vol% of DMC to E10 fuel blend considerably increases the RON and MON by about 4 and 3.5 points, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The growing need for renewable and environmentally friendly energy sources has motivated a lot of researchers to direct their efforts to meet these challenges. Transportation section is one of the most sources that participate in climate change. Transport accounted for more than the quarter of greenhouse gases in 2020 in USA, which is the largest participation in the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change1. Most of the transportation vehicles run on gasoline and diesel fuel, which contribute significantly to increased air pollution when combustion2. Oxygenated compounds were first used as environmentally friendly alternatives to the hazardous tetra ethyl lead compounds which were used to boost the octane number of gasoline. Ethanol and Methyl-tert butyl ether (MTBE) represented the most common oxygenates used to enhance the quality of gasoline as they have high-octane number3. They have been used in the United States 1980s. According to the literature, both ethanol and MTBE have been found to decrease exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) by 18% and 36%, respectively4. Methyl-tert butyl ether (MTBE) was the most common used oxygenated additive used to enhance the octane number of gasoline3,5. For health repercussions, the use of MTBE as gasoline additive has been banned because it has been found to contaminate the groundwater6. Short chain alcohols have been used as alternatives to MTBE. Ethanol is the most common oxygenate as it is an environmentally friendly and renewable source of energy. Addition of ethanol to gasoline has several advantages for example; it improves the octane number, it contributes significantly to the improvement of the engine performance and improves the combustion process and thus improves exhaust emission7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The higher octane number of ethanol indicates a relatively high antiknock value, good properties, and quality at high compression ratio, thereby avoiding self-ignition at end-gas region14,15. Dimethyl carbonate (DMC) is also an environmentally friendly oxygenated solvent. It is produced industrially by the carbonylation processes in which the CO2 gas is used as a raw material to produce DMC. DMC is prepared by a simple and cheap method which involves a direct reaction of carbon dioxide and methanol. So its production contributes in decreasing greenhouse gases and thus contributes in improving air quality16,17. DMC was investigated as oxygenated additive to gasoline and diesel and the results obtained were promising in improving tailpipe emissions and improving engine performance. The exhaust emitted gases HC, PM, and CO were found to be reduced when DMC was blended with diesel or gasoline fuel. The reduction was attributed by the researchers to the improvement in oxygen content resulting from blending DMC with the fuel18,19,20,21,22,23.
Ethanol-gasoline blends used as automotive fuel is a potential way for extending the fuel reserves. However many of serious problems have been detected with the use of a high concentration of ethanol in excess of 10 volume percent in gasoline fuel. A high concentration of ethanol may cause degraded engine performance such as poor cold start, hesitation, rough idling or engine stall24,25,26. Also, high concentrations of ethanol may cause valves wearing and elastomers deterioration27,28,29. High concentration of ethanol can also cause a decreasing in the fuel quality due to the phase separation that could be happen at high humidity and low temperature. Ethanol is highly hygroscopic so it absorbs the ambient water and separates at the bottom of the fuel24,30,31. This phase separation may also lead to corrosion to the metallic parts in the engine or in the fuel tanks32. Another drawback of using high concentration of ethanol in gasoline is that it dramatically affects the distillation curves and the volatility criteria of the fuel blend which negatively affects engine performance33. As a result, the acceptable limit for ethanol in gasoline approved by EPA is 10 volume percent. Gasoline containing 10 volume percentage of ethanol is only allowed for using in the current engines while higher concentrations of ethanol in gasoline require engine modifications.
Dual oxygenated gasoline formulation may meet the fuel requirements and be more suitable for the engine performance than using high concentration of single oxygenated fuel blends.
A lot of works discussed the effect of blending another oxygenated additive with ethanol gasoline formulations to avoid or diminishes the drawbacks of ethanol addition. Some researchers concluded that it is possible to design dual-alcohol formulations to have a vapor pressure very close to that of gasoline. They found that the use of higher alcohols such as iso-butanol and 3-methyl-3-pentanol as components in ethanol gasoline blends reduce the drawbacks associated with using ethanol alone in gasoline fuel. They found also that dual alcohol blends showed reasonable properties such as viscosity, volatility and water tolerance34.
Some works studied the impact of blending ethyl acetate on the properties of gasoline- ethanol formulations and the results showed that ethyl acetate increases the stability, the water tolerance, and the octane number of the fuel blends with no adverse effects on the volatility properties35,36. Amine and Barakat studied also the impact of the cyclohexanol on the water tolerance of ethanol-gasoline blends and they found that 3 volume percent of cyclohexanol increase the water tolerance of the 20% ethanol-gasoline blends by six times without any negative effect on the volatility properties of the fuel blends37.
In this work we aim at investigating the eco- friendly DMC to increase the gasoline reserve without negative impacts on the gasoline volatility by blending it with the acceptable percentage of ethanol (10 vol%) into gasoline. The presented work focuses on the impact of blending dimethyl carbonate, with various concentrations, into gasoline-ethanol blend (E10) on the distillation curve. The impact was illustrated through calculating the area under the distillation curve, which has not been presented in any previous similar studies.
Materials and methods
Fuel formulation
Cairo Petroleum Company provided us with the base gasoline, which was subjected to gas chromatographic analysis to determine its composition, as shown in Table 1. Dimethyl carbonate (99%) was procured from ACROS ORGANICS Co whereas ethanol (99.9%) was procured from Carlo Erpa Co. A set of fuel samples (E10, E10-2DMC, E10-4DMC, E10-6DMC, E10-8DMC, and E10-10DMC) in addition to the base gasoline (G) were formulated as indicated in Table 2. The main properties of the blend constituents are given in Table 3.
Characterization of fuel samples
The fuel blends were distilled by using STARDist Automatic Distillation unit MODEL No.913021 according to ASTM-D86. The vapor pressure was determined using the SETAvap II Automatic Vapor Pressure Tester-81000-2 according to ASTM-D5191. ZELTEX ZX-101X portable near-infrared octane-cetane analyzer was used to measure the octane rating. The area under the distillation curve was calculated by definite integrals41. Table 4 displays the uncertainty of the measured parameters.
Results and discussion
Volatility
Volatility is a very important parameter in the fuel industry. The fuel ignites in the vapor state in the engine so it converts to vapor first. The Volatility of gasoline is must adjusted to ensure good startability and driveability. It is also crucial to be controlled for environmental concerns, and there are numerous parameters used to estimate the volatility of the fuel.
Distillation curve
One of the most common and important parameters of gasoline industry is the distillation curve due to its importance for the engine performance. It establishes a relationship between the volume of the fuel recovered and the temperature of distillation. It presents important data that assess the gasoline volatility. T10, T50, and T90 are the temperature degrees at which 10, 50, and 90 volume percentages of the fuel distilled. From these data several fuel parameters can be deduced. ASTM-D4814 sets limits for these temperature degrees to control the gasoline volatility as given in Table 5. EN − 228 uses another data deduced from the distillation curve which are E70, E100, and E150.
Addition of ethanol to gasoline dramatically changes the distillation curve as shown in Figs. 1 and 2. This change was attributed to the azeotrope formation that happen between ethanol and some hydrocarbons present in gasoline. This azeotropic mixture possesses lower boiling range so the distillation curve shifts downwards in case of adding ethanol to gasoline42. In the present work we investigate the effect of dual oxygenates on the distillation curve of gasoline. Figure 1 shows that blending DMC into gasoline-ethanol blends does not change the front end of the distillation curve. Looking at the front end (up to 50% of fuel distilled) of the distillation curves in Fig. 1, we notice that the curves are overlapping on each other, which suggest that the addition of DMC has minimal influence on the lighter fraction of gasoline. The change in the curves is beginning from 60% of fuel distilled; we found that the curves shift slightly downwards as the amount of DMC in the fuel sample increases as clearly shown in Fig. 1. This may be attributed to the formation of azeotropic mixture between DMC and higher fraction of gasoline. This azeotropic mixture has boiling range slightly lower than boiling range of gasoline. For more clarification and comparing the effect of duel oxygenates on the distillation curve of gasoline; the area under each distillation curve is estimated as indicated in Methods section. Figure 2 shows the area under the distillation curve and shows the changes made to the distillation curve of gasoline by adding ethanol and the changes made to the distillation curve of E10 by adding DMC. Figure 3 describes the extent to which the area under the curve in E10 blend is significantly decreased. It is decreased from 73.1 to 64.5 square units (about 9 square unit) while the addition of DMC causes insignificant decrease in the area under the curves of gasoline-ethanol blends. For blend E10-10DMC, the area decreases only by about 2 square units as declared in Table 6. These results may be attributed to the formation of an azeotropic mixture between ethanol and the light fraction of gasoline, which has a boiling range much lower than that of gasoline. Thus, the distillation curve shifts downward, causing a significant decrease in the area under the curve. On the other hand, in the case of DMC, we found that the azeotrope formed between DMC and higher fraction of gasoline has a boiling range slightly lower than that of gasoline, as indicated by the distillation data. Therefore, the curve shifts slightly downward, causing an insignificant decrease in the area under the curve.
T10, T50, and T90
These temperature degrees are controlled by ASTM-D4814 as they are very important for engine performance. T10 is the temperature at which 10% of the fuel is distilled. Its importance is only to ensure a good cold start especially in cold weather and to ensure no increase in the emissions of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs). T50 characterizes the midrange volatility which ensures the engine warming-up, acceleration and avoid ice formation. Controlling T90 is significant for fuel economy43. Figure 4 shows the impact of the duel blends on these temperature degrees. The decrease in T10 was insignificant compared to the decrease in T50 of E10 fuel blend. For E10 fuel blend, T50 was decreased by about 20 °C. These results can be attributed to the fact that ethanol can form azeotropic mixture with the light fractions of gasoline causing the decrease in the temperature that happened in the front end of the distillation curve. On the contrary, blending DMC in E10 fuel blend has no effect on the reduction that occurred for T10 and T50 as shown in Fig. 4. This could be explained by the non-formation of an azeotropic mixture between DMC and the lighter components of gasoline. So we can conclude that the decrease in the front end and midrange temperature degrees of the studied blends is attributed to the presence of ethanol and not the presence of DMC42. T90 of gasoline was slightly reduced when ethanol was added by about 2% while it decreased by about 6% for E10-10DMC. This results confirm the assumption that ethanol does not form azeotropic mixture with the higher fraction of gasoline, while DMC does form one with the the higher fraction of gasoline.
E70, E100, and E150
The European Standards for gasoline En 228 set some parameters controlling the distillation curve of the fuel such as E70, E100 and E150 which are the volume percentages of the fuel distilled at temperature degrees 70, 100, and 150 °C; respectively. Figure 5 shows the impact of the dual oxygenated blend on E70, E100, and E150. The figure shows that the recovery of the fuel was increased from 28 to 52 vol% (i.e. by about 24%) for E10 fuel blend at 70 °C while the addition of DMC to E10 does not almost cause any increase in E70. E100 was slightly increased for E10 blend from 64 to 68 vol% (i.e. by about 4%) while it increased by addition of high concentrations of DMC to E10 fuel blend to reach 10% by the addition of 10 volume percentages of DMC to E10 fuel blend. For E150, there is no significant change for almost all the fuel blends. It was found that E150 for E10 increased by 0.0%, while that of E10-10DMC increased by 1.6%. This results confirm the assumption that ethanol does not form an azeotropic mixture with the higher fraction of gasoline, while DMC does form one with slightly lower boiling range than gasoline. From the previous results we can add DMC to E10 fuel blends up to 10 vol% without fearing of increasing the volatility of the fuel blends.
Octane rating and Knock resistance
Knocking resistance is the capability of the gasoline not to ignite spontaneously under the effect of the high compression. Octane rating is an important parameter for the efficiency and the performance of the engine. There are two methods for assessment the octane rating of gasoline. One of them is to test the fuel sample at mild conditions of temperature, speed and load which is the common number in gasoline market and known as the Research octane number (RON). The second method measures the fuel sample at severe conditions of temperature, load and speed which is known as the Motor octane number (MON). The average of RON and MON is called the antiknock index (AKI). The octane rating depends on the gasoline composition5. Straight run gasoline which is rich in paraffinic hydrocarbons usually has octane number of about 70. Gasoline rich in aromatics and isomerate (highly branched compounds) is of higher octane number than the straight run gasoline. However, gasoline must be formulated in such a way as to ensure a reasonable octane number and meet environmental concerns by setting limits to the aromatic contents and isomerate fraction, which increases the emission of volatile organic compounds.
Figure 6 shows how the addition of DMC participates in increasing the octane rating of E10 fuel blends. The RON increased for E10-10DMC blend by about 4 points which is higher than the effect of the addition of 10% of ethyl-tertbutyl ether (ETBE) and methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) to gasoline44 while its effect on RON is to some extent similar to that of ethanol8. The improvement of octane rating leads to enhancing the engine efficiency11. The Figure shows also that 10% of DMC considerably increases the MON of E10 fuel blend by about 3.5. AKI was found to be also increased by about 3.6 points. From these results, we can assume that DMC can improve the engine efficiency which has already been proven by literature.
Conclusion
The results of the experiments allow us to draw the following conclusions: the values of the volatility criteria of E10 fuel blends containing DMC have almost not changed from those of the E10 blend. Also, it was found that blending DMC into the E10 fuel blend significantly improves the octane rating. The addition of 10 volume percent of DMC increases the RON by about 4 points. DMC could be a promising environmentally friendly octane booster additive for E10 fuel blend while avoiding the drawbacks caused by using higher concentrations of ethanol. The authors suggest further investigations to evaluate DMC well as an additive to gasoline- ethanol blend, including physicochemical properties, fuel consumption and engine performance.
Findings and practical implication
In this section, we highlight the most important findings, which indicate that the addition of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) has little effect on the volatility properties of gasoline blended with ethanol. Also, it increases the octane number of the fuel blends, which may improve the fuel performance in the engine. These results can increase the possibility of blending DMC with ethanol-gasoline blends instead of using high concentrations of ethanol alone, which has negative effects on some gasoline properties that require engine modifications. Therefore, we strongly recommend conducting more research on such blends, such as performance and consumption experiments, as well as exhaust emissions.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
Abbreviations
- AKI:
-
Antiknock index
- ASTM:
-
American society for testing and materials
- CO:
-
Carbon monoxide
- CO2:
-
Carbon dioxide
- DMC:
-
Dimethyl carbonate
- E10:
-
Gasoline fuel containing 10 volume percent of absolute ethanol
- E100:
-
Evaporated fuel at 100 °C
- E150:
-
Evaporated fuel at 150 °C
- E70:
-
Evaporated fuel at 70 °C
- EN:
-
European standards
- EPA:
-
Environmental protection agency
- ETBE:
-
Ethyl-tert-butyl ether
- G:
-
Base gasoline
- E10-10DMC:
-
Gasoline blend containing 10 vol% ethanol and 10 vol% DMC
- E10-2DMC:
-
Gasoline blend containing 10 vol% ethanol and 2 vol% DMC
- E10-4DMC:
-
Gasoline blend containing 10 vol% ethanol and 4 vol% DMC
- E10-6DMC:
-
Gasoline blend containing 10 vol% ethanol and 6 vol% DMC
- E10-8DMC:
-
Gasoline blend containing 10 vol% ethanol and 8 vol% DMC
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gases
- HC:
-
Hydrocarbon emission
- MON:
-
Motor octane number
- MTBE:
-
Methyl-tert-butyl ether
- PM:
-
Particulate matter
- RON:
-
Research octane number
- T10:
-
Temperature at which 10% of fuel distilled
- T50:
-
Temperature at which 50% of fuel distilled
- T90:
-
Temperature at which 90% of fuel distilled
References
Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions. Accessed 30 Jul 2022.
Bleviss, D. L. Transportation is critical to reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Energy Environ. 10(2), 390. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.390 (2021).
Badra, J., Alowaid, F., Alhussaini, A., Alnakhli, A. & AlRamadan, A. S. Understanding of the octane response of gasoline/MTBE blends. Fuel 318, 123647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123647 (2022).
Etzel, R. A. & Mannino, D. M. Are oxygenated fuels effective? An evaluation of ambient carbon monoxide concentrations in 11 Western States, 1986 to 1992. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 46(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467436 (1996).
Ershov, M. A., Potanin, D. A., Tarazanov, S. V., Abdellatief, T. M. M. & Kapustin, V. M. Blending characteristics of isooctene, MTBE, and TAME as gasoline components. Energy Fuels 34(3), 2816–2823. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03914 (2020).
EPA. State Actions Banning MTBE (Statewide) (2007). https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P1004KIR.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=2006+Thru+2010&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery.
Mohammed, M. K., Balla, H. H., Al-Dulaimi, Z. M. H., Kareem, Z. S. & Al-Zuhairy, M. S. Effect of ethanol-gasoline blends on SI engine performance and emissions. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 25, 100891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2021.100891 (2021).
Anderson, J. E. et al. High octane number ethanol–gasoline blends: Quantifying the potential benefits in the United States. Fuel 97, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2012.03.017 (2012).
Hatte, P. & Bhalerao, Y. Influence of ethanol-gasoline fuel fractions on variable compression ratio engine. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 8(3), 2929–2936. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C4792.098319 (2019).
Hansen, A. C., Zhang, Q. & Lyne, P. W. L. Ethanol-diesel fuel blends: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 96(3), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.04.007 (2005).
Iodice, P., Senatore, A., Langella, G. & Amoresano, A. Advantages of ethanol–gasoline blends as fuel substitute for last generation Si engines. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 36(4), 1173–1179. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12545 (2017).
Al-Hasan, M. Effect of ethanol–unleaded gasoline blends on engine performance and exhaust emission. Energy Convers. Manag. 44(9), 1547–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00166-8 (2003).
Hsieh, W.-D., Chen, R.-H., Wu, T.-L. & Lin, T.-H. Engine performance and pollutant emission of an SI engine using ethanol–gasoline blended fuels. Atmos. Environ. 36(3), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00508-8 (2002).
Duan, X. et al. Influence of single injection and two-stagnation injection strategy on thermodynamic process and performance of a turbocharged direct-injection spark-ignition engine fuelled with ethanol and gasoline blend. Appl. Energy 228, 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.090 (2018).
Duan, X. et al. Experimental investigation of the effects of injection strategies on cycle-to-cycle variations of a DISI engine fueled with ethanol and gasoline blend. Energy 165, 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.170 (2018).
Zhang, M. et al. Catalytic materials for direct synthesis of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) from CO2. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123344 (2021).
Pacheco, M. A. & Marshall, C. L. Review of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) manufacture and its characteristics as a fuel additive. Energy Fuels 11(1), 2–29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef9600974 (1997).
SenthilKumar, S. & Rajan, K. Performance and emission characteristics of diesel engine using biodiesel with the effect of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) fumigation. Energy Sources Recov. Util. Environ. Eff. 44(2), 2986–2998. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1654565 (2022).
Chan, J. H. et al. Combustion, gaseous emissions and PM characteristics of di-methyl carbonate (DMC)-gasoline blend on gasoline direct injection (GDI) engine. Fuel 263, 116742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116742 (2020).
Pan, M. et al. The potential of dimethyl carbonate (DMC) as an alternative fuel for compression ignition engines with different EGR rates. Fuel 257, 115920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115920 (2019).
Abdalla, A. O. G. & Liu, D. Dimethyl carbonate as a promising oxygenated fuel for combustion: A review. Energies 11, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061552 (2018).
Wen, L., Xin, C. Y. & Yang, S. C. The effect of adding dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and ethanol to unleaded gasoline on exhaust emission. Appl. Energy 87(1), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2009.06.005 (2010).
Schifter, I. & González, U. Effects of ethanol, ethyl-tert-butyl ether and dimethyl-carbonate blends with gasoline on SI engine. Fuel 183, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.051 (2016).
Rahimpour, M. R., Keshtkari, S. & Aryafard, E. Ethanol for air transportation. Ethanol Sci. Eng. 2, 425–448 (2018).
ANON. Fuel and engine modifications needed for efficient cold starts. SAE J. Autom. Eng. 98(2), 69–72 (1990).
Alder, J. & Harvey, C. A. Vehicle Driveability With Gasoline/Alcohol Blends (Springer, 1987).
Waytulonis, D. Z. R. & Kittelson, D. E20 Effects in Small Non-road SI Engines A Literature and Information Search (Springer, 2008).
Mead, G., Jones, B., Steevens, P. & Timanus, M. The Effects of E20 on Plastic Automotive Fuel System Components 16 (Minnesota Center Automotive Research Minnesota State University, 2008).
Bawase, M. A. & Thipse, D. S. S. Impact of 20% Ethanol-blended gasoline (E20) on metals and non-metals used in fuel-system components of Vehicles. Arai J. Mobil. Technol. https://doi.org/10.37285/ajmt.1.0.1 (2021).
Karaosmanoǧlu, F., Içiǧigür, A. & Aksoy, H. A. Effects of a new blending agent on ethanol-gasoline fuels. Energy Fuels 10(3), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef950131z (1996).
Mužíková, Z., Pospíšil, M. & Šebor, G. Volatility and phase stability of petrol blends with ethanol. Fuel 88(8), 1351–1356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.02.003 (2009).
Yoo, Y. H., Park, I. J., Kim, J. G., Kwak, D. H. & Ji, W. S. Corrosion characteristics of aluminum alloy in bio-ethanol blended gasoline fuel: Part 1. The corrosion properties of aluminum alloy in high temperature fuels. Fuel 90(3), 1208–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.058 (2011).
Calvin, Y. L. et al. Volatility and physicochemical properties of gasoline-ethanol blends with gasoline RON-based 88, 90, and 92. Fuel https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121850 (2022).
Aghahossein Shirazi, S. et al. Effects of dual-alcohol gasoline blends on physiochemical properties and volatility behavior. Fuel 252, 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.105 (2019).
Amine, M., Awad, E. N., Ibrahim, V. & Barakat, Y. Effect of ethyl acetate addition on phase stability, octane number and volatility criteria of ethanol-gasoline blends. Egypt. J. Pet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2017.08.007 (2018).
Amine, M., Awad, E. N., Ibrahim, V. & Barakat, Y. Influence of ethyl acetate addition on phase stability and fuel characteristics of hydrous ethanol-gasoline blends. Egypt. J. Pet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.09.005 (2018).
Amine, M. & Barakat, Y. Effect of cyclohexanol on phase stability and volatility behavior of hydrous ethanol-gasoline blends. Egypt. J. Pet. 30(3), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2021.04.001 (2021).
Amine, M., Mohammed, H. A. & Barakat, Y. Volatility criteria and physicochemical properties of the promising dimethyl carbonate-gasoline blends. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21303-3 (2022).
Amine, M. & Barakat, Y. Properties of gasoline-ethanol-methanol ternary fuel blend compared with ethanol-gasoline and methanol-gasoline fuel blends. Egypt. J. Pet. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2019.08.006 (2019).
Li, D. G., Zhen, H., Xingcai, L., Wu-Gao, Z. & Jian-Guang, Y. Physico-chemical properties of ethanol-diesel blend fuel and its effect on performance and emissions of diesel engines. Renew. Energy 30(6), 967–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.07.010 (2005).
Amine, M., Awad, E. N. & Barakat, Y. Reformate-enriched gasoline-ethanol blends: Volatility criteria and azeotrope formation. Egypt. J. Pet. 28, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2019.08.007 (2019).
Shirazi, S. A., Abdollahipoor, B., Martinson, J., Reardon, K. F. & Windom, B. C. Physiochemical property characterization of hydrous and anhydrous ethanol blended gasoline. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57(32), 11239–11245. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.8b01711 (2018).
Rodríguez-Antón, L. M., Hernández-Campos, M. & Sanz-Pérez, F. Experimental determination of some physical properties of gasoline, ethanol and ETBE blends. Fuel 112, 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.087 (2013).
Da Silva, R., Cataluña, R., De Menezes, E. W., Samios, D. & Piatnicki, C. M. S. Effect of additives on the antiknock properties and Reid vapor pressure of gasoline. Fuel 84(7–8), 951–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.01.008 (2005).
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.A. and Y.B. put the main idea of the work. M.A. prepared the samples and measured the volatility criteria and the physical parameters. M.A. discussed and interpreted the obtained results. M.A. wrote the manuscript and draw the figures and tables. Y.B. reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Amine, M., Barakat, Y. Effect of dimethyl carbonate addition on ethanol–gasoline fuel blend. Sci Rep 13, 14551 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41329-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41329-5
- Springer Nature Limited