Abstract
In this paper, a high-performance antenna-on-chip (AoC) is implemented on gallium arsenide (GaAs) wafer based on the substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) and metasurface (MTS) technologies for terahertz band applications. The proposed antenna is constructed using five stacked layers comprising metal-GaAs-metal-GaAs-metal. The conductive electromagnetic radiators are implemented on the upper side of the top GaAs layer, which has a metallic ground-plane at its underside. The metallic feedline is implemented at the underside of the bottom GaAs layer. Dual wrench-shaped radiators are framed by metallic vias connected to the ground-plane to create SIW cavity. This technique mitigates the surface waves and the substrate losses, thereby improving the antenna’s radiation characteristics. The antenna is excited by a T-shaped feedline implemented on the underside of the bottom GaAs substrate layer. Electromagnetic (EM) energy from the feedline is coupled to the radiating elements through the circular and linear slots etched in the middle ground-plane layer. To mitigate the surface-wave interactions and the substrate losses in the bottom GaAs layer, the feedline is contained inside a SIW cavity. To enhance the antenna’s performance, the radiators are transformed into a metamaterial-inspired surface (i.e., metasurface), by engraving periodic arrangement of circular slots of sub-wavelength diameter and periodicity. Essentially, the slots act as resonant scatterers, which control the EM response of the surface. The antenna of dimensions of 400 × 400 × 8 μm3 is demonstrated to operate over a wide frequency range from 0.445 to 0.470 THz having a bandwidth of 25 GHz with an average return-loss of − 27 dB. The measured average gain and radiation efficiency are 4.6 dBi and 74%, respectively. These results make the proposed antenna suitable for AoC terahertz applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Considerable attention has been directed towards terahertz (THz) imaging systems, because this frequency band (0.1–10 THz) has unique spectroscopic properties for discriminating various materials. THz signal that can leverage advantages of both millimeter-wave and optics, such as high spatial resolution, good penetration depth to dielectric material or human tissue with no harmful ionization1. The exponential growth in data traffic in wireless communication systems has necessitated research at THz band as it can support significantly higher data rates of several Tbps than millimeter-wave band2,3. Maintaining the status quo of existing wireless communications infrastructure is otherwise likely to cripple it. Compared with optical communication, the THz communication system is insensitive to the atmospheric effects in outdoor communications and it’s relatively easily to track its beam. Moreover, THz systems can enhance the link gain by exploiting reflective paths.
On-chip antennas are needed to mitigate against the large transitional losses experienced by using interconnects at terahertz frequencies4. Antenna size for on-chip applications must meet more stringent requirements than their off-chip counterparts. At frequencies greater than 200 GHz, the size of the λ/4 or λ/2 antenna is small enough to fit onto a chip. The two types of antennas, which are commonly used for on-chip designs are patch antennas5,6,7, and dipole antennas8,9. These structures have sharp but narrow bandwidth that can limit the data throughput of a chip10. Typically, a patch antenna, when excited using a single-ended feedline, radiates energy in its broadside. The gain of such antennas for on-chip applications is limited to about 1 dB and the radiation efficiency to ~ 25% because a metallic ground layer is used to shield the radiator and lossy silicon substrate. The antenna’s fractional bandwidth is constrained to ~ 2.5%. This is mainly due to the gap between on-chip radiator and the ground layer. On the other hand, dipole antennas radiate energy omnidirectionally, and can be excited differentially. Although on-chip dipole antennas exhibit advantages of compact size and broad bandwidth (~ 15%), however they exhibit a relatively low gain (~ 8 dBi), and poor radiation efficiency (~ 10%). This is because a great proportion of the radiated power is dissipated in the silicon substrate. The shortcomings of dipole antennas can be overcome by placing a dielectric focal lens over the antenna11,12. On-chip antennas based on dielectric focal lens have a typical gain and radiation efficiency of ~ 15 dBi and ~ 60%, respectively. However, this technique introduces additional cost for system integration involving alignment of the antenna at the focus point of the focal lens. Furthermore, backside excitation is necessary so that the antenna can be attached on the surface of the focal lens using high-resistivity silicon substrate to minimize the substrate absorption.
Substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) technology has been used to design high-Q components in both millimeter and sub-THz bands13,14,15,16,17. Such structures combine the benefits of both planar transmission-line and non-planar waveguide with lower losses and wideband performance. SIW is essentially a dielectric cavity with metal layers on the top and bottom surfaces, surrounded by metallic walls. SIW antennas have been proposed at chip scale17; however, they have low gain and suffer from narrow bandwidths. This is evident in17, where a 400 GHz on-chip SIW antenna fabricated in SiGe process has a gain of 0.55 dBi, and a relative bandwidth of 7.8%.
Metasurface (MTS) is a two-dimensional (2D) metamaterial with subwavelength thickness18,19. MTS engineer EM-waves impinging on its surface to undergo abrupt amplitude, phase, and polarization changes. A metasurface can be constructed from a periodic array of well-designed metallic scattering geometries of sub-wavelength dimensions that are created on the surface of an electromagnetically transparent substrate. Low profile microstrip patch radiators based on MTS have been shown to provide a wide bandwidth and enhanced gain performance20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. In many antenna configurations, the metasurface is placed directly above20,21 or under22,23 the radiator, with an air-gap separation24. The drawback of these antennas includes complex design, large profile, and poor mechanical properties. It has been shown in25,26,27,28 that by stacking MTS on the radiator without an air gap a low-profile antenna can be realized with a broad bandwidth (|S11|≤ –10 dB) and a high gain. At THz frequency, the small physical size of the unit cell scatters precludes the design of complex structures from a fabrication point of view29.
This paper demonstrates the advantage of integrating SIW and MTS technologies in the design of on-chip antennas implemented on Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) substrate. The proposed antenna structure is far less complex to fabricate using the existing technology and should enable a significant cost reduction. In addition, the use of SIW technology makes it possible to integrate all transceiver components, thereby alleviating transitional losses experienced by using interconnects at THz frequencies.
This paper is organized as follows. Discussed in “next” Section is SIW inspired THz antenna-on-chip. In Section “AOC based on amalgamating SIW and MTS technologies”, SIW and MTS technologies are integrated in the design of AoC. In Section “Impedance matched feedline of the SIW-MTS inspired AOC”, the feedline is transformed to a metasurface to enhance the performance of the AoC. In Section “State-or-the-art comparison”, the salient features of the antenna are compared to state-of-the-art THz antennas. The work is concluded in “Conclusion” Section.
SIW-inspired THz antenna-on-chip
This section introduces the first version of the proposed antenna-on-chip design, implemented on GaAs, and involving SIW-based cavities employed to mitigate the coupling effects induced by the surface waves.
Antenna geometry and operating principles
The proposed antenna-on-chip is constructed on a stack of five layers that comprise metal-substrate-metal-substrate-metal. The radiation patches are implemented on the top surface of the upper Gallium Arsenide substrate layer. The bottom surface of the upper GaAs layer is metallized and used as a common ground plane. Immediately below, there is a lower second GaAs layer. The feedline is implemented on the bottom surface of the lower GaAs layer. The GaAs used had a relatively high permittivity (εr) of 12.88, which was necessary to reduce the overall antenna size. The loss tangent of GaAs substrate is 0.0004. Authors in30 have measured the dielectric properties of GaAs across 0.2–1.5 THz using time domain spectroscopy. Their results show that over this frequency range the change in the relative permittivity is negligible however the loss tangent increases by a factor of nine. A bulk GaAs technology process is used here to reduce the manufacturing costs.
The two wrench-shaped radiation elements created on the top side of the upper GaAs layer is shown in Fig. 1a,b. The configuration of the wrench-shaped antenna was selected as it provides excellent radiation coverage in both orthogonal planes over an ultra-wideband frequency range31. Surface wave modes are excited in the antenna structure that contribute to losses.
Moreover, the surface wave interactions between the two radiators can adversely affect the radiation characteristics of the on-chip antenna32. To mitigate the effects of surface waves, each radiator is confined using the SIW technology, which is realized by punching a periodic array of lateral via-holes through the upper GaAs layer to the middle ground-plane. The via-holes are filled with metal posts33.
The feed mechanism to excite the AoC is from the underside of the antenna structure using a T-shaped structure, as shown in Fig. 1e,f. The feed structure is constructed on the underside of the bottom GaAs layer. T-shaped feedline was used as it provides broadband matching34. SIW was applied to the feedline structure to confine the electromagnetic field. The antenna is excited by coupling the EM energy from the bottom GaAs layer to the radiators on the top surface of the upper GaAs layer through the arrangement of slots, shown in Fig. 1c,d, implemented in the middle ground-plane layer. Arrangement of the circular and linear interconnected slots conform to the shape of wrench to enable a strong and optimum path for EM coupling via the ground-plane.
The feeding structure has been optimized for impedance matching between the input to the antenna using CST Microwave Studio, which is based on finite integration technique (FIT). The top and bottom of the fabricated prototype antenna are shown in Fig. 1b,f, respectively. The structural parameters of the antenna are listed in the Table 1 in terms of microns and guide-wavelength centered at 0.455 THz. The antenna dimensions are 400 × 400 × 8 μm3.
Simulation results and experimental validation
The reflection-coefficient of the SIW inspired antenna is shown in Fig. 2. The simulated and measured impedance bandwidth of the antenna for |S11|≤ − 10 dB span from 0.451 to 0.459 THz, and from 0.450 to 0.458 THz, respectively. In both cases, the bandwidth is 8 GHz, which shows that there is good coherency between the simulated and the measured results. The average magnitude of the impedance match for the simulated and measured results are − 17.5 dB and − 14 dB, respectively. The measured reflection coefficient is better than the simulation across 0.45–0.454 THz however the measured results are worse than the simulation across 0.454–0.46 THz. The discrepancy is attributed to the imprecise simulation modelling.
The antenna gain and radiation efficiency were measured using the setup shown in Fig. 3a. The photograph of the measurement setup is shown in Fig. 3b. Signal source from the Rohde & Schwarz SMF 100A was injected into a D-band quad-mixer extender. The transmission signal from the mixer was applied to the AoC with a D-band waveguide-to-GSG probe. The received signal at the D-band standard horn antenna was down-converted through a harmonic mixer and fed to the Rohde & Schwarz SMF Spectrum Analyzer. The horn antenna was used to measure the radiation from the AoC. The AoC was then replaced by another standard horn antenna, and the antenna gain was determined using the traditional method of comparing the power received by the standard horn of a known gain with that received by the AoC. The distance between the AoC and the reference antenna had to satisfy the far-field condition, which is equal to or greater than \(r \ge 2D^{2} /\lambda_{o}\), where D is the largest aperture dimensions of the antenna and λo is the free-space wavelength at the operating frequency. The radiation efficiency of the AoC was calculated by taking the ratio of the measured radiated power to the input power. Measured antenna gain and the radiation efficiency over its operational frequency range are shown in Fig. 4. The gain and efficiency fluctuate between 1.1 and 2.1 dBi, and 47% and 52.5%, respectively. The average gain and efficiency are 1.6 dBi and 48%, respectively.
The above results corroborate that despite its small size the proposed SIW-inspired GaAs antenna operates over a wide frequency range at the terahertz band. In the next section, the metasurface technology is applied to enhance the antenna characteristics while maintaining its dimensions.
AoC based on amalgamating SIW and MTS technologies
This section discusses an enhanced version of the antenna introduced in “SIW-inspired THz antenna-on-chip” Section, which is realized with metasurface technology (MTS).
Antenna geometry and theoretical analysis
In this section, we have applied metasurface technology to enhance the performance of the SIW antenna presented in “SIW-inspired THz Antenna-on-Chip” Section. MTS was realized by etching periodic array of circular slots on the wrench-shaped radiation element, as shown in Fig. 5. The periodicity of the slots and the diameter of the slots are sub-wavelength at the operating frequency range of the THz antenna.
The distribution of individual scatterers is pivotal in determining the response of a surface. This property differentiates the metasurfaces from frequency selective surfaces, where periodicity of the scatters is of the order of the operating wavelength. The circular slots are aligned with the circular slots created on the ground-plane layer to maximize coupling of EM energy from the feedline on the underside of the bottom layer.
The circular slots etched on the radiating elements are non-magnetic scatterers resting on the GaAs substrate. The scatterers’ thickness is much smaller than the wavelength of the THz signal of interest. The metasurface locally modifies the amplitude, phase, or polarization of the incident light transmission or reflection.
For weakly-coupled scatterers, which are employed here, the metasurface can be modelled as a surface with spatially dependent local reflection and transmission coefficients. At the lossy metasurface, the sum of the transmitted and reflected powers is equal to, or smaller than the incident power, that is35
where the transmission and reflection coefficients in orthogonal polarization to the signal are represented by t⊥ and r⊥, whereas in the same polarization as the signal, by t∥ and r∥. The refractive indices of the GaAs substrate and air are n2 and n1, respectively. When the signal is incident at an angle θi with respect to the interface’s normal direction to the metasurface, Eq. (1) is still valid, while Eq. (2) and (3) are modified as
For a lossy metasurface, the left-hand-side of (1) is equal to 1 − L, where L is the fraction of the signal absorbed by the metasurface. This indicates that the loss resulting from the material absorption will tighten the limit in (1) even further.
The surface wave resonances on a finite MTS antenna can be qualitatively determined by:
where β represents the propagation constant of the surface wave resonances, and l is the total length of the metasurface structure given by
where N represents the number of cells, and P is the periodicity of the metasurface. By substituting (7) to (6), we get
The propagating constant of the surface waves decaying away from the metasurface is related to the decay constant (α) and the frequency (ω) by36
The propagation constant for the transverse magnetic (TM) and transverse electric (TE) waves are given by
where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, η is the intrinsic impedance, and Z is the surface impedance of the MTS structure.
Simulation results and experimental validation
Figure 6 shows the simulated and measured reflection response of both the SIW inspired antenna (Ant. #1) and the SIW-MTS inspired version (Ant. #2). It is evident that by combing MTS with SIW technologies, the antenna’s operating bandwidth and the impedance matching performance are enhanced. The measured bandwidth of Ant. #1 is 9.2 GHz, however for Ant. #2 it is 15.4 GHz for |S11|≤ –10 dB. This constitutes a significant improvement of 67.4%. Moreover, the average measured impedance matching of Ant. #1 is 12.5 dB, and for Ant. #2 it is 18 dB over the bandwidth defined by |S11|≤ –10 dB, which constitutes and improvement of 5.5 dB. Good correlation between the simulated and measured results can be observed.
The effectiveness of SIW-MTS approach on the radiation properties has been shown Fig. 7. It is evident from the measured results that by combining the two technologies the gain and radiation efficiency have been significantly boosted. The average gain and efficiency of Ant. #1 are 1.6 dBi and 48%, respectively; however, with application of both SIW and MTS technologies, the gain and efficiency on average improve to 3.2 dBi and 60%, respectively. The improvement in gain is 1.6 dBi, and the improvement in efficiency is 12%. These results demonstrate the benefit of amalgamating the two technologies in the design of on-chip antennas fabricated on GaAs. Moreover, the application of MTS does not complicate the antenna design and the antenna dimensions remain unchanged.
In the next section we investigate the application of MTS to the feedline, and its effects on the antenna performance.
Impedance matched feedline of the SIW-MTS inspired AoC
The simplicity and the ease of implementing MTS in the antenna structure prompted us to ask the question how it will affect the antenna performance when applied to the T-shaped feedline on the underside of the bottom GaAs layer. It was found in37 that the impedance bandwidth of the antenna highly depends on the vertical offset position and the length of the horizontal strip in the T-shaped feedline. These parameters have been optimized in “SIW-inspired THZ antenna-on-chip” Section. Circular slots of identical diameters as those created on the radiating elements were implemented on the feedline. Also, the two ends of the T-shaped feedline are short-circuited to the ground plane using metallic vias, as shown in Fig. 8. The short circuit forces the standing wave to nullify at the two ends of the T-shaped feedline and thus forcing the EM-field to maximize in the middle section of the feedline arms. The position of the T-shaped feedline is aligned with one of the wrench-shaped radiator element’s ends to optimize EM coupling through the middle ground-plane layer slots. The dimensions of the slots are given in Table 2 where all other structural dimensions remain unaltered and are listed in Table 1.
Figure 9 shows the performance improvements of the antenna with short-circuited feedline ends and MTS slots, referred to as Ant. #3, as compared to Antennas #1 and #2. It can be observed that the impedance bandwidth of Ant. #3 is substantially larger than that of Ant. #1 and #2. The measured impedance bandwidth of Ant. #3 is 25 GHz (0.445–0.470THz), Ant. #2 is 15 GHz (0.449–0.464) and Ant. #1 is 9 GHz (0.448–0.457). The impedance bandwidth of Ant. #3 is 67% greater than Ant. #2, and 178% greater than Ant. #1. The average measured values of impedance matching of Ant. #3, #2 and #1 are 21 dB, 15 dB and 13 dB. There is good agreement between the simulated and measured results. These results can be found in Table 3.
The gain and radiation efficiency of the three antennas are shown in Fig. 10. Ant. #3 has the average gain of 4.8 dBi over the frequency range 0.445–0.47 THz. Ant. #2 is observed to have an average gain of 3.4 dBi, and Ant. #1 of 1.6 dBi. The average radiation efficiency of Ant. #3 is 73%, Ant. #2 is 60% and Ant. #1 is 50%. These results are summarized in Table 4. The radiation pattern of the AoC was measured using the setup shown in Fig. 3. The simulated and measured radiation patterns of Ant. #1 and Ant. #3 at the antenna’s central operating frequency of 0.455 GHz are shown in Fig. 11. As the radiation from the AoC is blocked by the probe in certain directions and its supporting arm it was not possible to measure the complete radiation pattern. There is good correlation between the measured and simulated results.
The next section provides a comparison of the proposed antenna-on-chip with state-of-the-art structures reported in the literature, as well as discussion of its practical applications in the THz domain.
State-or-the-art comparison
The performance parameters of the proposed antenna-on-chip are compared with the recent literature in Table 5. The proposed SIW-MTS-inspired GaAs antenna operates at much higher THz frequency range (0.445–0.470 THz) compared to other antennas referenced in the table, except for38, which is fabricated on Silicon wafer. Compared to38, the proposed antenna (Ant. #3) exhibits marginally higher gain but significantly higher radiation efficiency of 73%. The dimensions of the proposed antenna are comparable to the structure of38. The comparison shows the effectiveness of applying combined SIW and MTS technologies in the realization of on-chip antennas.
Conclusion
This paper demonstrates, for the first time, the design and realization of an on-chip antenna by utilizing substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) and metasurface (MTS) technologies. The antenna comprises a stack of five interleaved GaAs and metal layers. Dual wrench-shaped radiating metal elements are implemented on the top side of the upper GaAs layer, whose bottom side is a common metal ground plane. The two radiating elements are contained inside a wall of metal posts that protrude through the GaAs layers. The antenna is excited from underneath using a T-shaped feedline implemented on the underside surface of the bottom GaAs layer. The radiating elements, and the T-shaped feedline are transformed into a metasurface by embedding on them a periodic array of circular slots of sub-wavelength diameter and periodicity. Electromagnetic energy from the feedline is coupled to the radiating elements through the slots in the middle ground-plane layer. It is shown that the proposed antenna operates over a wide frequency range from 445 to 470 GHz with the average impedance matching, gain, and radiation efficiency of 21 dB, 4.6 dBi, and 74%, respectively. To the best authors’ knowledge, these performance figures make the proposed antenna competitive over state-of-the-art designs available to date.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
References
Sun, Y. et al. A promising diagnostic method: Terahertz pulsed imaging and spectroscopy. World J. Radiol. 28(3), 55–654 (2011).
Dan, I. et al. A terahertz wireless communication link using a superheterodyne approach. IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 10(1), 32–43 (2020).
Liao, A. et al. Terahertz ultra-massive MIMO-based aeronautical communications in space-air-ground integrated network. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 39(6), 1741–1767 (2021).
Cheema, H. M. and Shamim, A. The last barrier: On-chip antennas. In: IEEE Microwave Magazine vol. 14, no. 1, 79–91 (2013).
Han, R., Zhang, Y., Kim, Y., Kim, D. Y., Shichijo, H., Afshari, E., and Kenneth, O. 280 GHz and 860 GHz image sensors using schottky-barrier diodes in 0.13 m digital CMOS.In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 254–256 (2012).
Tang, A. and Chang, M.-C. 183 GHz 13.5 mW/pixel CMOS regenerative receiver for mm-wave imaging applications. In: IEEE International Solid State Circuits Conference 296–298 (2011).
Tang, A., Gu, Q., Xu, Z., Virbila, G. and Chang, M.-C. F. A max 349 GHz 18.2 mw/pixel CMOS inter-modulated regenerative receiver for tri-color mm-wave imaging. In: IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium 1–3 (2012).
Schuster, F., Videlier, H., Dupret, A., Coquillat, D., Sakowicz, M., Rostaing, J., Tchagaspanian, M., Giffard, B. and Knap, W. A broadband THz imager in a low-cost CMOS technology.In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 42–43 (2011).
Caster, F., Gilreath, L., Pan, S., Wang, Z., Capolino, F. and Heydari, P. A 93-to-113 GHz BiCMOS 9-element imaging array receiver utilizing spatial-overlapping pixels with wideband phase and amplitude control. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 144–145 (2013).
Zhao, Y. et al. A 0.54–0.55 THz 2×4 coherent source array with EIRP of 24.4 dBm in 65nm CMOS technology. In: 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Phoenix, AZ 1-3 (2015).
Han, R. and Afshari, E. A 260 GHz broadband source with 1.1 mW continuous-wave radiated power and EIRP of 15.7 dBm in 65 nm CMOS. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference 138–139 (2013).
Grzyb, J., Zhao, Y. & Pfeiffer, U. A 288-GHz lens-integrated balanced triple-push source in a 65-nm CMOS technology. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 48(7), 1751–1761 (2013).
Kumar, A. & Raghavan, S. A review: Substrate integrated waveguide antennas and arrays. J. Telecommun. Electron. Comput. Eng. 8(5), 95–104 (2016).
Yuanzhu, D. Circular polarization slot antenna apparatus capable of being easily miniaturized. U.S. Patent 7,091,920, Aug. 15, 2006.
Luo, G. Q., Hu, Z. F., Liang, Y., Yu, L. Y. & Sun, L.-L. Development of low-profile cavity backed crossed slot antennas for planar integration. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57(10), 2972–2979 (2009).
Tang,H., Yang, G., Chen, J., Hong, W. and Wu, K. Millimeter-wave and Terahertz transmission loss of CMOS process-based substrate integrated waveguide. In: IEEE MTT-S International Microwave. Symposium. 1–3 (2012).
Hu, S. et al. A SiGe BiCMOS transmitter/receiver chipset with on-chip SIW antennas for Terahertz applications. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 47(11), 2654–2664 (2012).
Glybovski, S. B., Tretyakov, S. A., Belov, P. A., Kivshar, Y. S. & Simovski, C. R. Metasurfaces: From microwaves to visible. Phys. Rep. 634, 1–72 (2016).
Chen, H.-T., Taylor, A. J. & Yu, N. A review of metasurfaces: physics and applications. Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 076401 (2016).
Wang, J. et al. Metantenna: When metasurface meets antenna again. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 68(3), 1332–1347 (2020).
Hu, J., Luo, G. Q. & Hao, Z. C. A wideband quad-polarization reconfigurable metasurface antenna. IEEE Access 6, 6130–6137 (2018).
Nasimuddin, N., Chen, Z. N. & Qing, X. Bandwidth enhancement of a single-feed circularly polarized antenna using a metasurface: Metamaterial-based wideband CP rectangular microstrip antenna. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 58(2), 39–46 (2016).
Ta, S. X. & Park, I. Artificial magnetic conductor-based circularly polarized crossed-dipole antennas: 1. AMC structure with grounding pins. Radio Sci. 52(5), 630–641 (2017).
Park, I. Application of metasurfaces in the design of performance-enhanced low-profile antennas. EPJ Appl. Metamater. 5(11), 1–12 (2018).
Wu, Z., Liu, H. & Li, L. Metasurface-inspired low profile polarization reconfigurable antenna with simple DC controlling circuit. IEEE Access 7, 45073–45079 (2019).
Zhao, C. & Wang, C. F. Characteristic mode design of wide band circularly polarized patch antenna consisting of H-shaped unit cells. IEEE Access 6, 25292–25299 (2018).
Chen, Q. & Zhang, H. Dual-patch polarization conversion metasurface-based wideband circular polarization slot antenna. IEEE Access 6, 74772–74777 (2018).
Li, T. & Chen, Z. N. A dual-band metasurface antenna using characteristic mode analysis. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66(10), 5620–5624 (2018).
Chen, L. et al. Terahertz metasurfaces for absorber or reflectarray applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65(1), 234–241 (2017).
Jiusheng, L., Xiaoli, Z. Research on dielectric properties of gallium arsenides by using THz-TDS. In: Asia Communications and Photonics Conference and Exhibition 1–6 (2009).
Addepalli, T. and Anitha, V.R. Design and analysis of wrench-shaped multiple input multiple output antenna for UWB applications. In: International Conference on Wireless Communications Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) 130–134 (2020).
Pozar, D. Surface wave effects for millimeter wave printed antennas. In: IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium vol. 21, 692–695 (1983).
Rayas-Sanchez, J. E. and Gutierrez-Ayala, V. A general EM-based design procedure for single-layer substrate integrated waveguide interconnects with microstrip transitions. In: IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Dig. 983–986 (Atlanta, 2008).
Jang, Y.-W. Wide-band T-Shaped microstrip-fed twin-slot array antenna. ETRI J. 23, 33–38 (2001).
Arbabi, A. & Faraon, A. Fundamental limits of ultrathin metasurfaces. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–9 (2017).
Sievenpiper, D., Zhang, L., Broas, R. F. J., Alexopolous, N. G. & Yablonovitch, E. High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 47(11), 2059–2074 (1999).
Kim, M. K., Kim, K., Suh, Y. H. and Park, I. A T-shaped microstrip-line-fed wide slot antenna. In: IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, Transmitting Waves of Progress to the Next Millennium. Held in conjunction with: USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting 3, 1500-1503 (2000).
Alibakhshikenari, M. et al. Silicon-based 0.450–0.475 THz series-fed double dielectric resonator on-chip antenna array based on metamaterial properties for integrated-circuits. In: 13th International Congress on Artificial Materials for Novel Wave Phenomena—Metamaterials 2019 26–28 (2019).
Khan, M. S. et al. Design of bowtie-slot on-chip antenna backed with E-shaped FSS at 94 GHz. In: 10th EuCAP 1–3 (Davos, 2016).
Wang, L. and Sun, W. Z. A 60-GHz differential-fed circularly polarized on-chip antenna based on 0.18-μm COMS technology with AMC structure. In: IET Int. Radar Conf. 1–4 (Hangzhou, 20150.
Huang, H. T. et al. A circular ring-shape monopole on-chip antenna with artificial magnetic conductor. In: IEEE APMC 1–3 (2015).
Bao, X. Y. et al. 60-GHz AMC-based circularly polarized on-chip antenna using standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology. IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag 60(5), 2234–2241 (2012).
Lin, F. and Ooi, B. L. Integrated millimeter-wave on-chip antenna design employing artificial magnetic conductor. IEEE RFIT 174–177 (2009).
Upadhyay, S. and Srivastava, S. A 60-GHz on-chip monopole antenna using silicon technology. IEEE AEMC 1–2 (2013).
Song, Y. et al. The design of a high gain on-chip antenna for SoC application. In: IEEE MTT-S IMWS-AMP 1–3(Suzhou, 2015).
Nafe, M. et al. Gain enhancement of low profile on-chip dipole antenna via artificial magnetic conductor at 94 GHz. In: 9th EuCAP 1–3, 2015.
Yang, W. et al. A 60GHz on-chip antenna in standard CMOS silicon technology. In: IEEE APCCAS, Kaohsiung, 252–255, (2012).
Grzyb, J., Vazquez, P. R., Sarmah, N., Förster, W., Heinemann, B. and Pfeiffer, U. High data-rate communication link at 240 GHz with on-chip antenna-integrated transmitter and receiver modules in SiGe HBT technology. In: 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP) 1369–1373, 19–24 March (2017).
Guo, L., Deng, M., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X. & Yuan, Z. Dual-polarized on-chip antenna for 300 GHz full-duplex communication system. Hindawi Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2017, 2837629. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2837629 (2017).
Acknowledgements
Dr. Mohammad Alibakhshikenari acknowledges support from the CONEX-Plus programme funded by Universidad Carlos III de Madrid and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 801538. This work was supported by Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, Gobierno de España (Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional -FEDER-, European Union) under the research grant PID2021-127409OB-C31 CONDOR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, M.A., B.S.V., R.K.R., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.; methodology, M.A., B.S.V., R.K.R., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.; software, M.A., B.S.V, R.K.R.; validation, M.A., B.S.V., R.K.R., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.; formal analysis, M.A., B.S.V., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.; investigation, M.A., B.S.V., A.I., M.A‑H.; resources, M.A., B.S.V., R.K.R., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S.; data curation, M.A., B.S.V., R.K.R., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.A.; writing—review and editing, M.A., B.S.V., R.K.R., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.; visualization, M.A., B.S.V., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.; supervision, M.A., B.S.V., F.F.; project administration, M.A., B.S.V., F.F.; funding acquisition, M.A., A.I., M.A.‑H., C.H.S., F.F.. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alibakhshikenari, M., Virdee, B.S., Rajaguru, R.K. et al. High performance antenna-on-chip inspired by SIW and metasurface technologies for THz band operation. Sci Rep 13, 56 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27364-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27364-8
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Design of an ultra-compact reconfigurable IDC graphene-based SIW antenna in THz band with RHCP
Telecommunication Systems (2024)