Abstract
Several Late Viséan-Serpukhovian coral reefs were identified in Langping, Tianlin. They provided an opportunity to investigate paleo-environments suitable for the development of reef-building communities and the construction of coral reefs in Langping. In this paper, part of the reef-building environmental and the ecological characteristics of coral reefs then were elaborated by analyzing the development settings, palaeogeography, sedimentation of reefs, the response to hydrodynamic conditions of reef-building corals, effects of disturbance and non-reef-building organism on reef communities, and the influence of coral morphology on reef development. It is considered that the sedimentary environment of Langping in Late Viséan-Serpukhovian is suitable for the development of benthic communities. The current appearance of reefs is determined by both coral populations ecological characteristics and reef-building environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Early Carboniferous coral reefs in southern China were identified in the Yaoyunling formation and Du'an Formation in Xiadong village, Longjiangdong Village and Xinzhai Village, Langping Township, Tianlin County, Guangxi Province (Fig. 1). These reefs were of low degree maturity, with relatively few reef-building species, single reef-building way and short duration of construction. However, the benthic communities and ecology of the reefs differ from other contemporaneous reefs of Carboniferous1,2. The discovery of these coral reefs was significant for supplementing the evolution sequence of Carboniferous reefs and studying the development rules of the whole Carboniferous reef ecosystem1,3. The environmental setting of reef-building communities was one of a series of factors affecting the specific appearance and evolution of reefs, which was the foundation in controlling the overall characteristics of reefs, and played a leading role during the process of reef development and evolution4,5,6. Various factors affecting the specific appearance of the Mississippian shallow sea reefs were deduced by investigating reef ecological environments in the Langping and the ecological characteristics of the reef communities.
Although the ecological conditions for reef development are generally similar6,7,8, with regard to temperature, water quality, light, nutrition and oxygen, there are obvious differences in these environmental factors and ecological features among reefs with diverse appearances. These will result in significant diversity among reefs directly or indirectly9,10,11,12. Fang and Hou13 and Gong's research team2,10,14,15,16 have conducted significant research on many reefs in Langping. The palaeogeographic environment of Langping is favourable for reconstruction of the benthic communities, by combining lithofacies recognition, biological fossil identification, and sedimentary microfacies analysis14,15. Several of the reefs developed in the study area are rare late Viséan-Serpukhovian framework reefs with characteristics such as biodiversity, construction patterns, continuity, maturity and size that are different from synchronous reefs in other areas2,15,16. These characteristics reflect the unique environmental conditions and ecology of biological communities in the study area. Previous studies on the reef in Langping focused on paleontology, sediment and deposition. This paper takes a two-pronged approach, namely environmental factors and biotope characteristics, to explain the factors and influencing mechanisms that shape the specific appearance of these ancient reefs.
Sampling and methods
Field observation, identification, description, measurement, and photographing were carried out at four reef outcrops in Langping. On the basis of clearly observing the boundary of each reef, the exposed extension size of the reefs was accurately measured. The biological species and content, sediments were recorded in detail and photos were taken. About 100 representative samples of sediments and corals were collected from the base, center and roof of each reef, and corresponding data were recorded. Subsequently, more than 130 thin sections, 30 polished slabs surfaces and 200 photos were taken in the lab in preparation for microfacies paleoecological analysis. These samples now are stored in Department of Geology, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China.
Reef overview
The coral reef outcrop in Xiadong Village were exposed in EW direction and developed into large reefs without obvious discontinuity or evidence of multiple growth cycles. The reef was about 260 m in length and 50 m in height. Main builders consist of colonial corals Diphyphyllum and Siphonodendron with obvious vertical changes in the distribution of reef-building coral assemblages. Three successive reef-building coral population or coral assemblage, Diphyphyllum, Siphonodendron–Lithostrotion, and Diphyphyllum–Syringopora, can be clearly identified from bottom to top.
The multi-layer reef in Longjiangdong Village could be divided into three layers, 27 m × 3.8 m, 16 m × 2.5 m, and 40 m × 9 m in length and thickness respectively extending nearly EW. Diphyphyllum constructed the framework for reef layers. Coral clusters were presented on various scales with maximum of 2 m × 3 m in height and width, most being vertical clusters.
The patch reef in Longjiangdong Village was smaller, with the outcrop 11.2 m long and 6.2 m thick. The reef builders were colonial Diphyphyllum, solitary Caninia, and colonial Lithostrotionella. The monomeric Tetracoralla eventually formed an upper layer of the reef 3–5 m wide.
The coral layer reef preserved in the east of Xinzhai Village was about 15 m long and 5–6 m thick. Colonial Lonsdaleia formed a framework at the base of the reef, overlaid by unidentified dendrimers and colonial coral Antheria. Solitary corals eventually formed the reef’s upper layer, with the thickness of 3–5 m.
Results and discussion
Notwithstanding constraints on the amount of hard data, according to our integrated analysis, the developmental environment and ecology of reef communities have an important impact on the appearance of reefs.
Analysis of environmental conditions for reef development
Settings of reef development
The F/F extinction event in Late Devonian caused the complete recession of the reef-building communities based on stromatoporoid-coral assemblages7,17. The Carboniferous is generally considered to be a sub-optimal period for the development of framed reefs. After the biological mass extinction, microorganisms and algae rebuilt new reef-building ecosystems18,19. Some short-term biological frame reefs developed with low diversity, limited reef-building organisms, small sizes, and restricted distribution20. Harsh climate and marine conditions occurred in the Mississippian, including extensive marine hypoxia, repeated glacial and interglacial climate changes, and frequent changes of sea level and seawater surface temperature, potentially hindering the recovery of Early Carboniferous metazoan reefs7,21.
Metazoans gradually began to participate in reef building in Early Viséan. A large number of biogenic structures formed by corals and bryozoans began to appear, including a small number of sponge reefs/mounds in the middle and late stage of Viséan. The richness and biodiversity of the Mississippian post-zoobenthic reefs flourished in the late Viséan during which corals, bryozoans, sponges, calcareous microorganisms, and some calcareous algae became the main builders3 and large-scale reefs could also be seen in some areas although most of the Viséan metazoan reefs were tabular or laminar. Thus, the metazoan skeletal reefs in the middle to late Viséan were considered to have been resurrected due to relatively warm climatic conditions and higher sea levels after a period of complete disintegration at the end of the Devonian and recession at the beginning of the Carboniferous7.
Consequently, the coral reefs in the study area were the products of shallow benthic communities thriving in relatively favourable conditions of Late Viséan-Serpukhovian, which was common for reef development at that time7. Thus, it is expected that more synchronous reefs would to be identified in southern China, or even in the study area in the future.
Paleogeography of reefs
Langping is located in Dian-Qian-Gui Basin22 regionally (Fig. 2), in the eastern end of Tethys tectonic domain and at the interjunction of Tethys and Pacific structure globally. The Carboniferous Dian-Qian-Gui Basin is adjacent to the Tethys Basin. During the Early Carboniferous, the continent of Gondwana was close to the equator but was separated from the northern continent by the Tethys, where the tropical currents flowed freely from east to west. The benthic warm-water organisms were distributed widely with high abundance and diversity on both sides of the shallow shelf of Tethys.
Viséan-Serpukhovian ecosystems experienced dramatic climate changes and widespread glaciation25. However, the Viséan was also a key layer for a variety of biological structures, with abundant coral reefs and a high diversity of shallow benthic communities, peaking in the late Viséan. Newly discovered post-faunal reefs in Tianlin were mainly formed in the late Viséan-Serpukhovian period, which coincided with frequent sea level fluctuations and possible glacial changes. It seems counterintuitive that tropical coral communities developed during glacial period. However, recent studies suggest that the persistent warm ocean currents on the platform helped some coral species survive from Carboniferous glacial events24. While other areas of symbiotic reefs were poorly developed, Tianlin may provide an ecological sanctuary for corals associated with ocean currents26.
Sedimentation of reef development
According to the regional geological structure, the slope model for Langping paleocarbonate platform was obviously different from that of steep slope platform margin, which could be directly affected by waves. Langping palaeo-platform could be regarded as one of the small blocks (block fault barrier) separated from a large platform (continental margin sea basin)13. The relative positions of these blocks were crucial for the emergence and growth of reefs.
In situ development of mud-crystalline tuffs and muddy tuffs with weak hydrodynamic conditions is common in the Langping area, and evaporites are poorly developed. There were patch reefs and reef layers in different sizes in the wide intraclast beach, where obviously developed reef beach complexes were rare. The fragments of carbonate base broken by storm in the clastic beach haven’t been observed. The study area is considered to be gentle-slope open platform27,28 based on sedimentary characteristics. It suggests that the study area was far away from the margin of steep-slope platform that directly affected by waves, and more consistent with less energetic internal environments of gentle-slope platform.
On the vast platform of Langping gentle slop, deep water lead to low water energy. While in the coastal area, the water energy was relatively strong, thus coarse-grained bioclastic beach and a small amount of point reef could be developed. The beaches were irregular-shaped due to long term transportation and reformation effects of waves and water flow, showing low and gentle slope angles. Dispersed reef-beach complexes at the platform margin slightly impacted inner-platform seawater and the water flows smoothly29.
Therefore, it can be assumed that Langping reefs developed along the intertidal shallows of the terrace. The seawater around Langping carbonate platform in Late Viséan-Serpukhovian was relatively shallow while the water flow was strong. Remains of crinoids, brachiopods, a few foraminifera, and solitary corals were likely broken by strong currents, and deposited in situ with a small amount of gravels and lime-mud (Fig. 3). The clastic beach was unstable, suggesting large-scale wave-resistant structures could not be formed quickly30 due to insufficient cohesive and consolidating organisms. In addition, the circumferential impact of water in extensive terraces leads to mud-lime deposition, which is detrimental to most benthic organisms. However, bondstone was more likely to be formed by some binding algaes in the platform (Fig. 4). Therefore, neither the surrounding or the inner region of the platform could provide favourable living conditions for coral reefs to develop over for a long term. The gently sloping terrace environment of Lanping resulted in significant differences in growth size, wave resistance and reef-building capacity between corals in the study area and those on the edge of the steeply sloping terrace.
At the same time, the warm climate of the late Viséan-Serpukhovian, the good circulation of seawater around the Langping platform, and the abundant supply of oxygen and nutrients were a series of favourable conditions that facilitated the growth of reef-building corals, which led to uplifts being formed on clastic beach, including patch reefs and reef layers with certain sizes. These uplifts impeded waves and provided a protected nearshore environment, though they were much smaller than those developed at the steep-slope platform margin. The inhabitants on the beach could not resist strong waves. These rises were therefore known as reef-beach complexes and could only persist where waves and currents were mild28. They were essentially different from the framework coral reefs which developed on steep-slope platform margin that reflected changed hydrodynamic conditions, nutrient sources, reef sizes, and growth rates.
Another potentially favourable factor in the study area could be the deeper water area in the gentle-slope sedimentary environment, which could provide more stable conditions and reduce the damaging effects of global glacial events and large scale sea level fluctuations on reef-building communities25. The frequent fault activities in Dian-Qian-Gui Basin caused the rise and fall of equivalent sea level. More influence of sea-level fluctuations and hydrodynamic conditions would be exerted on Langping platform due to its small size. Furthermore, reef growth promoted by reef-building communities would be frequently disturbed. The sediments displaying evidence of multicycle sedimentation, different components, and diversely fragile clasts in the study area provided direct evidence of frequently changing environment.
Alternatively, the sedimentary environment of Langping platform provided conditions favorable for reef-building communities to develop and reefs to grow rapidly. These factors directly or indirectly determined the ecology of reef-building communities and the general appearance of reef development in the study area.
Overall, the environmental factor is the primary factor affecting the overall development trend of reefs.
Inferred ecological characteristics of reef communities
Response of reef-building corals to hydrodynamic conditions
Hydrodynamic conditions are very important factors for reef development, which directly determine the abundance and distribution of each reef-building population and are key factors influencing sedimentation and reef growth, and was particularly evident at Langping. Evidence from the fossils suggested the reef-building corals were also changed in response (Table 1). The hydrodynamic condition changes during the development of reefs are inferred based on analysis of the vertical sediments and microfacies changes of coral reefs in the study area31. How these ancient reef-building corals adapted to hydrodynamic conditions was reconstructed combining the evolution of reef-building communities with the study.
The Xiadong coral reef started with colonization and expansion of Diphyphyllum on the bioclastic hard substrates32,33. They grew vertically into upright clusters (Fig. 5A) and were insensitive to more sediment in a relatively calm, turbid water environment34. The relatively dense clumped Siphonodendron and massive Lithostrotion (Fig. 5B) were better suited to the turbulent water environment, becoming dominant over time, with Diphyphyllum subordinate with the continuous increase of the water energy, as indicated by the characteristics of sediment particles from fine to coarse. After flourishing for a period, the Siphonodendron–Lithostrotion assemblage eventually waned, likely due to the failure to adapt to the increasing hydrodynamic conditions. Diphyphyllum had persisted combined with Syringopora, to maintain the growth of the reef. However, this assemblage subsequently declined as a result of strong hydrodynamic conditions and finally died out in response to continuous falling of sea level. Consequently, the reefs stopped developing.
The Longjiangdong multi-layer reef was composed of three relatively independent, flat reef layers, suggesting three distinct periods of reef development. Diverse species were identified in the reef, with colonial coral Diphyphyllum contributing greatly to reef growth. Diphyphyllum clusters colonized in patchy form on substrates composed of bioclasts or lithic gravels (Fig. 6A). The first reef-building process was brief, ending under high-energy water conditions after a period of growing (Fig. 6B). Subsequently the hydrodynamic conditions became weaker and favorable. Then Diphyphyllum once again flourished. Diphyphyllum clumps in the unit grew closely together in strong currents, with larger and more sparse individuals than in the lower units. A relatively low energy environment was formed between the Diphyphyllum clusters (Fig. 6C). Subsequently, Diphyphyllum could only grow in a limited area of suitability due to the disturbance of high-energy water brought about by short-term sea-level rise and fall. Afterwards, the environment became more favourable and Diphyphyllum expanded rapidly. As a result, the upper unit of Longjiangdong coral reef was formed, in which Diphyphyllum individuals were slightly larger than those in the first two units. Finally, because the kinetic energy of the water continued to weaken, the plaster deposition forced the whole coral reef to stop growing (Fig. 6D).
Longjiangdong patch reef started to develop in a relatively deep water environment. Diphyphyllum initially colonized and expanded in favorable conditions with the increase of water energy. Then the reef-builders transitioned from a single coral species to an assemblage of Diphyphyllum–Caninia–Lithostrotionella. These three coral species grew independently and contribute almost equally to the structure of the reef. However, the structure and function of the coral community were not yet stable enough. It was easily influenced by the weakening hydrodynamics and the increasing sedimentation, resulting in only small patch reefs.
The Xinzhai layer reef was initialized by colonization and expansion of Lonsdaleia on bioclastic beach. Large coral clusters were formed in the presence of turbulent water. With the weakening of hydrodynamic conditions, an unknown branchlike organism and Antheria communities continued to develop separately in this area. Slender branchlike organisms expanded rapidly in these low-energy water environments until they were replaced by some individual corals as hydrodynamic energy increased. Each builder was short-lived in this layer reef, departing from the reef just at the beginning of colonization and expansion, due to rapidly changed hydrodynamic conditions.
The evolution of reef-building corals in these four reefs indicated that both the coral assemblages and coral individuals would constantly adapt to the changing hydrodynamic conditions in Langping as sea level rose and fell. Although this was a reactive adjustment of coral populations in response to long-term environmental impacts, it was clearly positive for the building and development of coral reefs.
Impact of disturbance on reef communities
Disturbance is a relatively discontinuous event, which is ubiquitous in nature. It may indirectly affect the composition and population structure of reef communities by changing the environmental conditions, thus affect the structure and function of reef communities, even the evolution of the reef35. The major disturbances evident in these Mississippian framework reefs were associated with frequent changes of water flow, and drastic changes of climate and weather. These seem to be most obvious in the Langping platform due to its small size, with more frequent environmental influence evident on the reef communities in the study area.
The most direct effect of disturbance events on coral reefs is the disruption of continuously evolving reef communities, which is common in coral reef studies. After the interruption caused by disturbances, some communities gradually recover due to the absence of continuous disturbance, or the dominant biota may be substituted by invading communities. The winner after interruption is decided by random factors to a large extent, in a ‘Competitive lottery’36. The conditions for the emergence of ‘Competitive lottery’ also include the need for species in a community to have similar abilities to invade discontinuities and to tolerate environmental conditions.
Certainly, low-intensity disturbance does not necessarily produce discontinuity, but medium-intensity disturbance without discontinuity could directly impact on community species diversity. According to the ‘Moderate disturbance hypothesis’, moderate disturbance is conducive to a higher level of community diversity37. In environmental conditions with moderate intensity of disturbance, most species will not disappear entirely. The dominant pioneer species will also be restrained by disturbance to a certain extent, so large number of species can coexist, attaining the highest diversity35.
The reef-builders in Langping are diverse compared with the Late Carboniferous reefs in Ziyun County10, which also developed in Dian-Qian-Gui Basin. More than 4 reef-building corals are identified in Xiadong reef, while 4 and 3 are in Xinzhai layer reef, Longjiangdong patch reef respectively. These reef-building corals, mostly Diphyphyllum, Lithostrotion, Siphonodendron and Lonsdaleia, were distributed irregularly in the reefs. Their ecological niche and function were likely similar and none of them was obviously dominant in the community (Fig. 7). This is in line with ‘Competitive lottery’ theory and the ‘Moderate disturbance hypothesis’.
The stability of a classical reef ecosystem includes the ability to withstand external disturbances and the ability to return to its original state once the disturbance is removed37,38. It is generally accepted that communities with high diversity are always more stable although ecosystem stability is not absolutely correlated to biodiversity35.
There have been no reef-building corals with strong resistance and rapid recovery ability in the communities in Langping. None of these corals succeeded in developing into dominant species that can build reef shelves, which made the reefs in Langping mostly appear in the form of small patch reefs or reef layers. However, formation of the large reef in Xiadong Village, patch reef in Longjiangdong Village, and layer reef in Xinzhai Village were all related to their relatively high diversity of reef-building corals. Compared with the situation where only one reef-building organism dominated the Bianping large coral reef, Wengdao large phylloid algal reef and Ivanovia cf. manchurica patch reefs in Ziyun County10, Guizhou province, the different coral assemblages in Langping area could effectively adapt to changing hydrodynamic conditions and maintain reef growth.
Species diversity increased by disturbance stabilized the ecosystemas shown during the construction of coral reefs in Langping.
Effects of non-reef-builders on reef-building corals
Besides reef-building corals, there were a large number of reef-dwellers and off-reef organisms in the study area. Reef-dwellers referred to the species that didn’t directly contribute to reef growth in the community, mainly including various benthos and algaes39. Off-reef organisms are not part of the reef-building community, but also play an important role in participating in energy flow and providing organic matter to the reef ecosystem40.
Common reef-dwelling organisms include crinoids, brachiopods, gastropods, various algae, foraminifera, bryozoans and individual corals. Crinoids were overwhelmingly dominant in numbers in the reef samples studied here.
Carboniferous echinodermata in Guangxi Province reached its peak in Middle-to-Late Mississippian. In terms of amount and distribution, thick limestone with echinodermata debris in the carbonate platform were often dominated by crinoids41,42,43,44,45,46. The large number of crinoids in Langping excluded other metazoans and restricted the development of benthic reef-builders in Late Viséan-Serpukhovian in Langping, leading to poorly developed reef-building communities.
Microorganisms and algaes had limited success in stablishing on the moving clastic beach in frequently disturbed water. There has not been obvious evidence of extensive “algal turf” in the coastal area of Langping platform. Only a few corals bonded by algal mats were observed47 (Fig. 8). In addition to their significant contribution to primary productivity, macroalgae were considered to play an important role in two aspects of coral reef ecosystems. One was to promote reef construction by its own binding and consolidation48,49. The other was to create a good condition for zoobenthos larvae to dwell and develop, thereby improving species diversity50. The limited productivity of algae in Langping constrained coral reef trophic inputs, which may then have limited populations of dependent metazoans. As a result, algaes and other metazoans were unable to achieve a variety of reef-building patterns, such as bonding, bounding, entanglement51,52. The reef framework in the study area was not stable in the presence of strong water flow, and the biological communities could not deal with frequent environmental changes, which were directly related to poor development of calcareous algae.
Influence of coral morphology on reef development
The accumulation of reef structure had obvious impact on communities. Large reef structures could support abundance and diverse biota by modifying local environments and creating diverse conditions. Consequently the reef-building communities thrived between disturbances, stabilizing reef construction. In terms of large reef, the framework-building corals would play a key role in reef construction regardless of which kind of patterns was adopted. Therefore, reef-building corals with large size, rapid growth vertically, and strong resistance would become the biggest contributors to reef frame construction.
The main reef-building corals in Langping were composed of Diphyphyllum, Lithostrotion, Siphonodendron, and Lonsdaleia, etc., being the dominant builders. These corals were similar in morphology such as cluster colony, thick and strong skeleton, and densely packed individuals (Fig. 9), which enabled them to resist water flow. At the same time, the upright colonies were adaptable to relatively calm water, being insensitive to mud deposition. The ecological characteristics of the Langping corals matched the gently sloping environment, the deep water environment and the rapidly changing energy of the currents. These cluster corals were able to colonize hard substrates and expand rapidly, thus altering the surrounding environment. The visible carbonate uplifts were formed with a large amount of benthos grouped into reef-building communities. These distinct uplifts constructed by coral clusters in different water conditions are composed of coral reefs of different sizes and appearance in the study area.
The complex and diverse local environments formed by large coral reefs can significantly increase benthic populations and improve reef species diversity. As a result, the nutrient flow in the community becomes complicated, and nutrients could be recycled effectively by reducing loss caused by water flow. Therefore, the overall productivity of large coral reef communities was always high. Complex trophic structure satisfied most of the benthos in the community with sufficient nutrients and inorganic salts.
The morphology of reef-building corals in Langping enabled them to become predominant species in various water environments, which promoted the continued domed growth of coral reefs and facilitates the development of reef-building communities that form a variety of reefs. It suggests that the morphology of reef-building corals was a key prerequisite for reef development.
In conclusion, coral reef communities are always constrained and influenced by environmental conditions. However, the ecology of the inhabitants is also an important factor in the formation of coral reefs.
Conclusions
Based on the environment and ecology analysis of the four Late-Mississippian reefs in Langping, new understanding of the influencing factors and evolutionary mechanism of reef-building process are summarized as follows.
-
(1)
The climate, sea-level conditions in Late Viséan-Serpukhovian and the tropical ocean current flowing through the Langping area ensured that the reef-building corals could continue to survive and build reefs under unfavorable geological background.
-
(2)
The gentle slope of Langping platform provided the necessary conditions for the benthic communities. And water environmental factors determined the general appearance of reefs in the study area.
-
(3)
The adaptability of the morphological characteristics of reef-building corals to the variable hydrodynamic conditions is of positive significance to the continuous construction of coral reefs.
-
(4)
The construction process of reefs has confirmed that disturbance can increase the species diversity of reef communities and enhance the stability of ecosystems, and other biological factors also have a certain impact on the development of reefs.
Data availability
These materials were stored in the Department of Geology, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China. The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
Gong, E., Zhang, Y., Guan, C. & Chang, H. Main features of the Carboniferous organic reefs in the world. J. Palaeogeogr. 12(2), 127–139 (2010).
Chen, X. et al. The basic characteristics of Early Carboniferous coral reef at Xiadong Village in Tianlin, Guangxi, and its sedimentary environment. Acta Geol. Sin. 87(5), 597–608 (2013).
Yao, L. & Wang, X. Distribution and evolution of Carboniferous reefs in South China. Palaeoworld 25, 362–376 (2016).
Barash, M. Environmental conditions as the cause of the great mass extinction of marine organisms in the Late Devonian. Dokl. Earth Sci. 475, 845–848 (2017).
DeCarlo, T. et al. Community production modulates coral reef pH and the sensitivity of ecosystem calcification to ocean acidification. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 745–761 (2017).
Gouezo, M. et al. Drivers of recovery and reassembly of coral reef communities. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 286, 20182908. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2908 (2019).
Yao, L. et al. The longest delay: Re-emergence of coral reef ecosystems after the Late Devonian extinctions. Earth Sci. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.103060 (2019).
Yao, L. et al. Middle Viséan (Mississippian) coral biostrome in central Guizhou, southwestern China and its palaeoclimatological implications. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 448(SI), 179–194 (2016).
Zhang, Y., Gong, E., Wilson, M., Guan, C. & Sun, B. A large coral reef in the Pennsylvanian of Ziyun County, Guizhou (South China): The substrate and initial colonization environment of reef building corals. Asian Earth Sci. 37, 335–349 (2010).
Yang, D., Gong, E., Chen, X. & Guan, C. Comparison of the late carboniferous reef community ecosystem in Guizhou and Guangxi. J. Northeast. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 35(1), 107–111 (2014).
Zhang, Y. et al. Factors controlling the development of Fomichevella coral bioconstructions in the Gzhelian-Asselian (Late Pennsylvanian-early Permian) of Houchang, southern Guizhou, southern China. Palaeobiodivers. Palaeoenviron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-020-00431-6 (2020).
Maillet, M. et al. Late Pennsylvanian carbonate platform facies and coral reef: New insights from southern China (Guizhou Province). Facies 67, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-020-00613-w (2021).
Fang, S. & Hou, F. Bryozoan-coral patch reef of Datang age Carboniferouse period of Langping, Tianlin County, Guangx Province. J. Southwest Pet. Inst. 4, 1–15 (1985).
Chen, X. et al. The ecological function of crinoid in the Carboniferous reefs in Tianlin, Guangxi. Geol. Rev. 59(3), 446–453 (2013).
Yang, D. et al. Longjiangdong coral reef palaeoecology of the upper carboniferous Huanglong formation in Tianlin county, Guangxi province. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 31(3), 404–412 (2013).
Gong, E., Yang, D., Chen, X. & Guan, C. The late carboniferous reefs palaeoecology characteristics of Langping, Tianlin County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Geol. Rev. 60(3), 1–14 (2014).
Copper, P. Ancient reef ecosystems expansion and collapse. Coral Reefs 13, 3–11 (1994).
Stanley, G. The History and Sedimentology of Ancient Reef Systems (Kluwer Academic (Plenum Publishing), 2001).
Qi, W. & Fan, J. Evolution history of reef ecosystem and evolution of earth environment. Earth Sci. Front. (China Univ. Geosci. Beijing) 9(3), 124 (2002).
Gong, E. & Guan, G. Carboniferous extinction and influence on evolution of reef communities. J. Northeast. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 19(2), 122–124 (1998).
George, R., Peter, M., David, J. & Mary, L. Ecological ranking of Phanerozoic biodiversity crises: The Serpukhovian (early Carboniferous) crisis had a greater ecological impact than the end-Ordovician. Geology 40(2), 147–150 (2012).
Mei, M. & Li, Z. Sequence-stratigraphic succession and sedimentary-basin evolution from Late Paleozoic to Triassic in the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi region. Geoscience 18(4), 555–563 (2004).
Feng, Z., Yang, Y. & Bao, Z. Lithofacies paleogeography of the Carboniferous in south China. J. Paleogeogr. 1(1), 75–86 (1999).
Maillet, M. et al. Coral reefs and growth dynamics of a low-angle Carboniferous platform: Records from Tianlin, southern China. Sediment. Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2019.105550 (2020).
Wang, Z. & Yang, F. Carboniferous paleobiogeography and palaeoclimate of China. Earth Sci. 13(5), 495–502 (1988).
Gouezo, M. et al. Impact of two sequential super typhoons on coral reef communities in Palau. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 540, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11518 (2015).
Gu, J., Ma, F. & Ji, L. Types, characteristics and main controlling factors of carbonate platform. J. Palaeogeogr. 11(1), 21–27 (2009).
Xu, W. Depositional Models of Gently Sloping Carbonate Platforms: A Case Study of the Middle-Upper Jurassic Karlof-Oxfordian in the Amu River Basin, Turkmenistan (Chengdu University of Technology, 2013).
Guo, Q. Identification of Reef-Beach Body and Comprehensive Study of Sedimentary Reservoir of Xiaohaizi Formation in Bamai Area (Northwestern University, 2012).
Ma, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, W. & Li, B. Transition of carbonate ramp to rimmed platform: A case study from the Lower Cambrian Qingxudong formation at the Majiang section in Eastern Guizhou. Geol. Sci. Technol. Inf. 32(4), 43–49 (2013).
Ma, Y. Carbonate Microfacies-Analysis, Interpretation and Application (Geological Publishing House, 2006).
Chen, Y. Paleoecological characteristics of hard substrate environment. Miner. Rock 5(3), 141–151 (1985).
Taylor, P. & Wilson, M. Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth Sci. Rev. 62, 1–103 (2003).
Chen, Y. Marine Benthic Palaeoecology (Ocean Press, 1991).
Mao, Z. & Zhu, J. Effects of disturbances on species composition and diversity of plant communities. Acta Ecol. Sin. 26(8), 2695–2701 (2006).
Connell, J. Diversity in tropical rain forest and coral reefs. Science 199, 1302–1310 (1978).
Zhang, T., Gao, W. & Lan, G. Application of systematology to reef paleoecology research. J. Southwest. Pet. Inst. 13(4), 1–8 (1991).
Huang, J. & Han, X. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Chin. Biodivers. 3(1), 31–37 (1995).
Wiedenmayer, F. Modern sponge bioherm of the Great Bahama Bank. Eclogae Geol. Helv. 71, 699–744 (1978).
Flügel, E. Microfazielle Untersuchungsme thoden vonkalken (Springer, 1978).
Thomas, W. & Williami, A. The, “age of crinoids”: A Mississippian biodiversity spike coincident with widespread carbonate ramps. Palaios 21, 238–248 (2006).
Grimmer, J., Holland, N. & Messing, C. Fine structure of the stalk of the bourgueticrinid sealily Democrinus conifer (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Mar. Biol. 81, 163–176 (1984).
Yan, X., Mao, Y., Zhao, Y., Peng, J. & Wu, M. The holdfasts of eocrinoids in Cambrian, Guizhou Province. Acta Palaeontol. Sin. 49(3), 380–388 (2010).
Guensburg, T. & Sprinkle, J. Rise of echinoderms in the Paleozoic evolutionary fauna: Significance of paleoenvironmental controls. Geology 20, 407–410 (1992).
Kerri, A. & William, I. Paleoecology of framebuilders in early Silurian reefs (Brassfield Formation, Southwestern Ohio). Ausich Palaios 17, 237–248 (2002).
Yang, S. Paleoecology-Principle and Method (Geological Publishing House, 1993).
Cai, F., Chen, W. & Lu, Y. Coastal Water Ecology (Ocean Press, 1989).
Ken, P. The Growth and Ecology of Upper Cambrian Microbialite Biostromes from the Notch Peak Formation in Utah (Lomalinda University, 2016).
Huang, W. et al. Role of calcimicrobes and microbial carbonates in the Late Carboniferous (Moscovian) mounds in southern Guizhou, South China. J. Palaeogeogr. 8, 26 (2019).
Lei, X., Huang, H. & Huang, L. Current state of ecological functions of coralline algae in coral reef ecosystem. Ecol. Sci. 31(5), 585–590 (2012).
Wu, Y. Paleoecology of Permian reefs in Guangxi and Guizhou. Oil Gas Geol. 15(3), 201–209 (1994).
Lu, T., Wen, Y., Qiang, Z., Fan, J. & Wen, C. Reef-building model for the Permian organic reefs in South China. Lithofacies Paleogeogr. 18(2), 16–19 (1998).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Dr. Xiaohong Chen for providing related photos.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.Y. conceived the research concept, then drafted and revised the manuscript. H.C. polished the language. X.L., and P.W. and L.S. sorted the materials respectively. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, D., Chang, H., Liu, X. et al. Analysis on ecological characteristics of Mississippian coral reefs in Langping, Guangxi. Sci Rep 12, 19635 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22081-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22081-8
- Springer Nature Limited