Abstract
Denosumab is a game-changing drug for giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB); however, its clinical biomarker regarding tumor ossification of GCTB has not been elucidated. In this study, we investigated the relationship between Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the ossification of GCTB and evaluated whether endogenous nuclear β-catenin expression predicted denosumab-induced bone formation in GCTB. Genuine patient-derived primary GCTB tumor stromal cells exhibited osteoblastic characteristics. Identified osteoblastic markers and nuclear β-catenin translocation were significantly upregulated via differentiation induction and were inhibited by treating with Wnt signaling inhibitor, GGTI-286, or selective Rac1-LEF inhibitor, NSC23766. Furthermore, we reviewed the endogenous ossification and nuclear β-catenin translocation of 86 GCTB clinical samples and elucidated that intra-tumoral ossification was significantly associated with the nuclear translocation. Three-dimensional quantitative analyses (n = 13) of tumoral CT images have revealed that the nuclear β-catenin translocation of naïve GCTB samples was significantly involved with the denosumab-induced tumor ossification. Our findings suggest a close relationship between the nuclear β-catenin translocation and the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB. Investigations of the nuclear β-catenin in naïve GCTB samples may provide a promising biomarker for predicting the ossification of GCTB following denosumab treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a bone neoplasm characterized by locally aggressive and massive bone destruction 1,2,3,4. The chief components of GCTB are osteoclast-like giant cells (GCTB-OCs) that express RANK and fibroblast-like spindle stromal cells that express RANKL, a key mediator of osteoclast activation 5,6,7,8. Recently, Histone 3.3 G34W (H3G34W), a driver mutation in H3 histone family member 3A (encoded by H3F3A), was identified as a specific surrogate marker of GCTB 6,9,10. The presence of this mutation confirmed that GCTB stromal cells (GCTB-SCs) are the actual neoplastic component of this tumor 11.
Surgical resection has been the treatment of choice for GCTB 4,12,13,14. However, curative resection for GCTB in the axial skeleton (spine, sacrum, and pelvis) is not often feasible 4,12,14. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANKL, was recently approved for the treatment of GCTB 15,16,17,18. Denosumab inhibits RANKL, thereby preventing RANK–RANKL interactions, resulting in deletion of GCTB-OCs and decreasing tumor-induced osteolysis 15,16,17,18. In addition, diffuse bone formation with the peripheral sclerotic rim is often observed after denosumab treatment 4. These histological and clinical consequences can result in a more comfortable operative procedure and decrease surgical morbidity 4,15,16,17. However, the underlying mechanism of that ossification was not known.
Although osteolysis is the characteristic feature of GCTB, intra-tumoral and peripheral bone develops in 30–50% of cases of GCTB 19,20. Consistent with this observation, several previous studies reported that GCTB-SCs have the ability to undergo osteoblastic differentiation 1,7,8,13,21,22. One essential requirement for osteoblastic differentiation could be the association between WNT/β-catenin signaling and its target gene, Runt-related transcription factor2 (RUNX2) 23,24,25. Previous studies reported nuclear β-catenin translocation and expression of RUNX2 in GCTB-SCs 21,26. These results suggest the involvement of the so-called "canonical" Wnt signaling pathway in the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs. However, this hypothesis has remained unproven 7, and no useful markers have been identified to predict bone formation in GCTB.
In this study, we investigated the relationship between the Wnt/β-catenin signaling, a critical pathway for osteogenic differentiation, and ossification of GCTB using patient-derived primary cultures. In addition, we investigated whether nuclear β-catenin translocation in GCTB-SCs predicted bone formation after denosumab treatment.
Results
Denosumab induced bone formation in the patient with GCTB
In patients with GCTB, administration of denosumab often induced massive bone formation, as shown in Fig. 1a and b. Histologically, we observed loss of GCTB-OCs with marked bone formation (Fig. 1c–f). Meanwhile, H3G34W-positive GCTB-SCs remained adjacent to or within the newly formed bone (Fig. 1g, h and S1), suggesting that GCTB-SCs were of the osteoblast lineage, as previously reported 1,5,27.
Isolation of GCTB-SCs and induction of bone differentiation
To assess the osteogenic potential of GCTB-SCs, we harvested primary cultures from freshly sorted samples (pGCTB-SCs). As shown in Fig. 1i, almost all pGCTB-SCs were positive for H3G34W, demonstrating that the cultures were pure. Next, we grew pGCTB-SCs in the presence or absence of OGM. The presence of OGM strongly stimulated ALP expression in pGCTB-SCs in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1j and S2a). In addition, the mRNA levels for representative osteoblast genes ALP, COL1A1, IBSP (bone sialoprotein), RUNX2, and BGLAP (osteocalcin) were significantly increased by the presence of OGM (Fig. 1k) in a time-dependent manner (Fig. S2b). Osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SC was not affected by denosumab treatment (Figs. S2c,S2d). Fluorescence immunocytochemical analysis revealed that H3G34W-positive pGCTB-SCs expressed high levels of ALP after OGM treatment (Fig. 1l). Based on these findings, we confirmed that H3G34W-positive pGCTB-SCs had the capacity to differentiate into bone-forming osteoblasts.
Effect of the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling on osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs
The osteoblastic differentiation from mesenchymal precursors is regulated by the Wnt and BMP signaling pathways 23,28,29,30. In addition, previous studies reported nuclear β-catenin translocation in GCTB-SCs 31. Hence, we hypothesized that the canonical Wnt pathway regulates the osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs. Accordingly, we grew pGCTB-SCs in OGM, lysed the cells, and purified cytoplasmic and nuclear protein fractions. By western blotting, we confirmed that the nuclear β-catenin translocation was upregulated within 12 h after OGM treatment, although cytoplasmic β-catenin remained unchanged (Fig. 2a, b and S5). To further determine whether the nuclear β-catenin translocation was due to activation of the canonical Wnt pathway, we treated pGCTB-SCs with LiCl which activates canonical Wnt signaling 7. Interestingly, treatment with LiCl induced neither LEF1, a gene involved in the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, nor ALP expression in pGCTB-SCs (Fig. 2c–e).
Inhibition of the nuclear β-catenin translocation by geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor abolished osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs
Next, we studied the effect of GGTI-286 (GGTI), a recently identified Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor 32, on the osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs. GGTI dramatically decreased OGM-induced ALP expression in pGCTB-SCs in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3a and b). GGTI also significantly abolished the osteoblastic makers' expression (ALP, COL1A1, IBSP, and RUNX2; Fig. 3c). We also confirmed that GGTI inhibited the OGM-induced nuclear β-catenin translocation in a dose-dependent manner whereas GGTI did not affected on cytoplasmic β-catenin (Fig. 3d, e and S6). The immunocytochemical analysis also revealed that GGTI abrogated the OGM-induced nuclear β-catenin translocation in pGCTB-SCs (Fig. 3f). These results suggested that the nuclear β-catenin translocation was indispensable for osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs.
Activation of Rac1 was required for osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs
We then investigated the underlying mechanism by which GGTI inhibited the OGM-induced nuclear β-catenin translocation. A previous study claimed that GGTI binds a geranylgeranyl group on the C terminus of Rho family small GTPases, including Rac1 33. Furthermore, Rac1 promotes the nuclear β-catenin translocation through phosphorylation at Ser191 by a downstream effector kinase, JNK 34. Hence, we analyzed the effect of a selective Rac1-GEF inhibitor, NSC23766 (NSC), on OGM-induced osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs. Like GGTI, NSC also decreased the expression levels of ALP and other osteoblastic markers in pGCTB-SCs following OGM treatment (Fig. 4a–c). NSC also diminished nuclear β-catenin translocation following OGM treatment (Fig. 4d, S3 and S7). Together, these findings indicate that activation of Rac1 is required for the nuclear β-catenin translocation and subsequent osteoblastic differentiation of pGCTB-SCs.
Nuclear β-catenin translocation in GCTB-SCs of patients with GCTB and its association with intra-tumoral ossification of GCTB
Some cases of GCTB exhibit spontaneous intra-tumoral ossification, whereas others do not 20,35. Based on our in vitro results, we hypothesized that in cases in which endogenous nuclear β-catenin translocation occurs in GCTB-SCs, the tumor cells might be more likely to differentiate into osteoblasts. To test this notion, we first assessed the distribution of nuclear β-catenin labeling index (NBLI), a method to evaluate nuclear β-catenin 46,47, in GCTB-SCs using 91 clinical samples of GCTB. Of those samples, three cases were excluded due to overlap, one was removed due to low sample quantity, and another was excluded because the associated patient data were not available. Ultimately, a total of 86 tumor sections were retrospectively reviewed. The background data on these sections are presented in Supplementary Table S1. A retrospective evaluation revealed that the distribution of NBLI in GCTB-SCs was variable, ranging from 0% to 76.4% (median: 13.5%, Fig. 5a). In addition, the histogram of NBLI in GCTB-SCs exhibited a non-normal distribution (Fig. 5b). We set the median as the cut-off value of the NBLI and subdivided the cases of GCTB into two groups as follows: positive (NBLI > 13.5%, positive group, n = 43) and negative for nuclear β-catenin translocation (NBLI ≤ 13.5%, negative group, n = 43). Retrospective evaluation of NBLI significantly coincided among reviewers (R2 = 0.877 by Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient; P < 0.001, Fig. S4) When we examined the prevalence of intra-tumoral ossification of GCTB, we found that 42 out of 86 samples (48.8%) developed intra-tumoral ossification (Fig. 5c and d), consistent with a previous report 20. Remarkably, the positive group exhibited a significantly higher rate of intra-tumoral ossification (Fig. 5e) than the negative group (Fig. 5f), as shown in Fig. 5g (P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test).
The number of GCTB-SCs with nuclear β-catenin translocation in biopsy samples was correlated with the degree of bone formation after denosumab treatment
The diversity of endogenous nuclear β-catenin translocation in GCTB-SCs may explain differences in bone formation after denosumab treatment. To address this issue, we studied 14 consecutive cases of GCTB that received denosumab. One case was excluded due to a problem with the specimen; the remaining 13 tumor samples were reviewed. Detailed information on individual cases is summarised in Table 1.
First, we examined NBLI in GCTB-SC using naïve GCTB samples prior to denosumab administration. Seven cases were positive and six were negative. Case #5, a positive group representative, exhibited massive bone formation after denosumab treatment, as revealed in CT images (Fig. 6a and b). Histologically, deletion of osteoclastic giant cells and prominent bone formation was observed (Fig. 6c and d). However, H3G34W-positive GCTB-SCs were still present in the specimen (Fig. 6e and f). Biopsy samples acquired before denosumab treatment revealed that multiple GCTB-SCs were positive for nuclear β-catenin translocation (NBLI = 23.9, Fig. 6g). Meanwhile, in case #10, a typical case of the negative group, bone formation after denosumab treatment was scarce (Fig. 6h and i). Additionally, the surgically resected samples exhibited loss of osteoclast-like giant cells but not bone formation (Fig. 6j and k). However, stromal cells were positive for H3G34W, as were the biopsy samples (Fig. 6l and m). Importantly, before denosumab treatment, only a few GCTB-SCs were positive for nuclear β-catenin translocation (NBLI = 8.5, Fig. 6n).
We next quantified denosumab-induced bone formation using CT images, as described previously 36. In the window setting where the tumor margins were discernible, ROIs for histogram analyses were semi-automatically delineated by tracing the tumors' outer margins before (Fig. 7a–g) and after (Fig. 7i–o) denosumab treatment. The entire, peripheral, and intra-tumor Agatston scores of the GCTBs were obtained by histogram analyses using SYNAPSE VINCENT (Fig. 7h and p). Notably, after denosumab administration, the positive group exhibited significantly higher ossification than the negative group (Fig. 7q–s). Therefore, the positive group would have more chances to undergo denosumab-induced bone formation. Thus, the NBLI in GCTB-SCs in biopsy samples represents a reasonable and straightforward biomarker for predicting the degree of bone formation after denosumab treatment.
Discussion
The introduction of denosumab has attracted attention as a novel therapy of GCTB. Several clinical studies have confirmed that denosumab administration prevents osteolysis, concomitant with the deletion of GCTB-OCs 15,16,18,37. It may also cause additional histological consequences, including central sclerosis with peripheral bone formation, enabling surgical downstaging. However, the degree of bone formation is case-dependent, and we experienced some cases with little bone formation despite the treatment. Therefore, we assumed that predicting subsequent bone formation after denosumab administration would have clinical benefits for decision making, enabling clinicians to achieve optimal treatment for GCTB.
We first focused on the mechanism of osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs. H3G34W-positive GCTB-SCs had the ability to differentiate into osteoblasts but not chondrocytes or adipocytes (data not shown), indicating that GCTB-SCs did not retain pluripotency. During osteoblastic differentiation, the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling is the dominant pathway 26. However, in our study, forced activation of LRP- and GSK3β-mediated canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling did not cause differentiation. By contrast, our results showed that the apparent nuclear β-catenin translocation was associated with the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs and that a recently identified inhibitor of the canonical Wnt signaling, GGTI, effectively inhibited it.
GGTI inhibits protein prenylation, and this process is essential for the correct localization and functions of GTPases, including Rac1 32. In addition, Rac1 stimulates nuclear β-catenin translocation through phosphorylation at Ser191 by a downstream effector kinase, JNK 27. Consistent with these previous results, we found that Rac1 inhibition suppressed nuclear β-catenin translocation and osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs. Therefore, we considered that denosumab administration caused activation of Rac1 and triggered the nuclear localization of β-catenin, followed by osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs, ultimately resulting in the cessation of tumor activity. If this is the case, forced activation of Rac1 in GCTB-SCs by a potent Rac1-agonist, such as the recently discovered natural polyketide deacetylmycoepoxydiene 38, may stimulate the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs, and combination treatment with denosumab and Rac1-agonist could be an effective strategy for the treatment of GCTB.
We detected baseline nuclear β-catenin translocation in pGCTB-SCs, indicating intrinsic activation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Interestingly, a previous study showed that miR-125a stimulates the translocation of β-catenin in GCTB-SCs through GSK3β-mediated canonical signaling, resulting in cell proliferation and tumorigenicity 39. However, extrinsic inhibition of GSK3β by LiCl did not play significant roles in osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs, as shown in Fig. 2c and d. Together, we speculated that in GCTB of naïve status, there was a baseline activation of canonical Wnt signaling that regulates the proliferation of GCTB-SCs. Meanwhile, denosumab administration may cause Rac1-associated activation of the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway by unknown factors.
Several stimuli can elicit Rac1 activation. For example, both Wnt-5a (a Wnt family member) and Ror2 (receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor2, a dominant receptor of Wnt-5a) activate Rac1 and induce differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts 38,40. Expression of the Wnt inhibitor secreted frizzled-related protein (sFRP) in GCTB-OCs has been confirmed by comprehensive mRNA profiling of GCTB-SCs 41. More importantly, we observed expression of Wnt-5a in GCTB-SCs (data not shown). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that deletion of GCTB-OCs by denosumab might decrease the level of sFRP in tumor tissues, activate a cascade of Wnt-5a/Ror2/Rac1 signaling, and finally cause the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs.
As another essential feature of this study, we found that endogenous nuclear β-catenin translocation was associated with osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB-SCs via denosumab treatment. Besides, upregulated NBLI was correlated with endogenous intra-tumoral bone formation in GCTB. Notably, a recent epigenetic analysis showed that GCTB-SCs could be classified into three groups, S1 to S3. S1 cells are characterized by the expression of osteoblast-associated genes such as osteopontin, whereas S3 cells have markers of the myofibroblastic lineage, e.g., alpha-smooth muscle actin. S2 cells have features intermediate between those of S1 and S3 cells 42. Therefore, we speculated that GCTB-SCs with nuclear β-catenin translocation would correspond to S1 cells and be partly committed to differentiation into osteoblasts. Therefore, as discussed in a previous paragraph, the deletion of GCTB-OCs by denosumab triggered the cells' final osteoblastic differentiation. However, this notion should be further investigated.
This study had several limitations. First, the precise mechanism by which Rac1 activation occurs in GCT-SCs following denosumab treatment was not fully elucidated. More detailed in vitro experiments, including co-cultures of GCTB-SCs and GCTB-OCs, are needed to clarify this issue. Secondly, the number of patients who received denosumab treatment was relatively small in a retrospective analysis. This is because the rarity of GCTB and the recent approval of denosumab for GCTB treatment. To further validate the ability of the NBLI in GCTB-SCs to predict bone formation after denosumab treatment, we plan to conduct more extensive prospective studies in the future.
Conclusion
In summary, our findings suggest a close relationship between the nuclear β-catenin translocation via Rac1 activation and the osteoblastic differentiation of GCTB. Investigations of NBLI in naïve GCTB samples will provide a promising biomarker for predicting the degree of bone formation after denosumab treatment.
Materials and methods
Reagents
Monoclonal rabbit anti-H3G34W antibody (clone RM263) was purchased from RevMab Biosciences (San Francisco, CA, USA). Monoclonal rabbit anti-β-catenin antibody (#32572), anti-alkaline phosphatase, tissue non-specific antibody (#126820), goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L preabsorbed (Alexa Fluor® 488, #150081), and goat anti-mouse IgG H&L preabsorbed (Alexa Fluor® 594, #150120) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Monoclonal mouse anti-actin clone C4 antibody (MAB1501) was purchased from Merck Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA). Monoclonal mouse anti-RUNX2 antibody (sc-390351) was purhchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). A selective inhibitor of geranylgeranyltransferase1, GGTI-286 (#22756), was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA), and a selective Rac1 (a Rho-family small GTPase) inhibitor, NSC23766, was purchased from Merck Millipore.
Immunohistochemistry for H3G34W mutation analysis
Surgically-resected GCTB clinical samples were fixed with 4% PFA and embedded in paraffin (FFPE). Immunostaining was performed as described previously 43. Briefly, antigen retrieval of deparaffinized, rehydrated sections was performed by heating in a microwave for 20 min with 10 mM citric acid at pH 6.0 (FUJIFILM Wako). After blocking with normal goat serum for 30 min at room temperature, the sections were incubated with anti-H3G34W monoclonal Abs (1:200) at 4 °C overnight 44. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation with 3% hydrogen peroxidase in methanol for 30 min at room temperature, and specimens were then incubated with Dako EnVision™+ Dual Link System-HRP (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 45 min at room temperature. Antibody complex was visualized using the diaminobenzidine substrate system (FUJIFILM Wako) and counterstained with hematoxylin 44. Section images were obtained on a Keyence BZ-X800 microscope (Keyence Corporation, Osaka, Japan), and nuclear immunoreactivity for H3G34W was evaluated.
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining for GCTB-OCs
FFPE sections (not exposed to denosumab) were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated with adjusted solutions for 15 min at 37℃ according to the manufacturer's protocol (TRAP/ALP staining kit, Fujifilm Wako) for the detection of TRAP activity of GTCB-OCs. The stained sections were washed three times with deionized water and counterstained with Methyl Green Solution (FUJIFILM Wako) for 5 s. Denosumab-exposed tissue samples were also stained as negative controls.
Co-labeling assay for H3G34W and RUNX2
Adjacent pre-exposed FFPE sections were immunohistochemically stained for H3G34W and RUNX2, the master regulator of osteogenesis, to evaluate the osteogenic potential of GCTB-SCs, using ImmPRESS® Duet Double Staining Polymer Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Briefly, antigen unmasking of deparaffinized, rehydrated sections was performed with citrate-based solutions at pH 6.0, and endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by incubation with BLOXALL® Blocking Solution (Vector Laboratories) for 20 min, followed by incubation with 2.5% normal horse serum for 20 min at room temperature. The adjacent specimens were incubated with anti-H3G34W rabbit monoclonal antibody (1:200) or anti-RUNX2 mouse monoclonal antibody (1:200) at 4 °C overnight and then incubated with ImmPRESS Duet Reagent (Vector Laboratories) for 10 min at room temperature. Antibody complex was visualized by incubation with the ImmPACT DAB EqV Substrate (Vector Laboratories) for 2 min against H3G34W mutation or the ImmPACT Vector Red Substrate (Vector Laboratories) for 20 min against RUNX2.
Establishment of primary culture and treatment
Some fresh GCTB tumor samples were obtained from surgeries and washed with warmed PBS. The samples were minced in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Together with small pieces of chipped tissues, the cell suspension was transferred to culture dishes and cultured at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. GCTB-OCs were present only in the first passage, whereas primary GCTB-SCs (pGCTB-SCs) were further amplified. Upon reaching confluence, pGCTB-SCs were sub-cultured, and the third through eighth passages were used for subsequent experiments. To induce osteogenic differentiation, confluent cells were treated with osteogenic medium (OGM) containing Minimum Essential Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 nM dexamethasone (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan), 100 μM ascorbic acid (FUJIFILM Wako), and 10 mM β-glycerophosphoric acid (NACALAI TESQUE, INC., Kyoto, Japan) for various periods.
Preparing cell blocks and immunocytochemistry of GCTSCs
To determine the purity of primary cultures, we prepared cell blocks and performed immunostaining with anti-H3G34W. Confluent suspensions of pGCTB-SCs were harvested, and cell pellets were prepared by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,500 rpm. The pellets were incubated overnight at 37 °C in DMEM, and then fixed for 3 h at room temperature (RT) in 10% Formalin Neutral Buffer Solution (FUJIFILM Wako). After fixation, the supernatant was aspirated, and 1% sodium alginate (FUJIFILM Wako) was added to the pellets. Gelatinous cell blocks were immediately obtained by addition of 100 μl of 1 M CaCl2 (FUJIFILM Wako), and the blocks were embedded in paraffin and immunohistochemically stained for H3G34W mutation.
Alkaline phosphate staining
ALP activity is widely used to assess the early osteogenic ability of osteoblast-like cells. We seeded pGCTB-SCs into a 24-well plate at a density of 5 × 104 cells per well. After 48 h of incubation, the culture medium was exchanged and further incubated for the indicated periods. The cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 10% formalin, and stained with premixed ALP substrate solutions (FUJIFILM Wako).
pGCTB-SCs were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well and incubated for 48 h. After the cells reached confluence, the medium was exchanged, and the samples were incubated further. ALP assays were performed using the TRACP & ALP assay kit (Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan). Briefly, treated cells were lysed in extraction solution (saline with 1% NP-40), mixed with freshly prepared p-nitrophenyl phosphate substrate (12.5 mM), and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The optical density of p-nitrophenol at 405 nm was determined using iMark™ Microplate Absorbance Reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Finally, ALP activity was normalized with a standard curve derived from Escherichia coli C75 (Takara Bio).
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA of treated pGCTB-SCs was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse-transcribed with PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (Takara Bio). qRT-PCR was conducted with a LightCycler 1.5 (Perfect Real Time, Takara Bio, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) with the TB Green® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Takara Bio). Primers are listed in Supplementary Table S2. Data were standardized against the housekeeping gene GAPDH. At least four separate experiments were conducted.
Immunofluorescence staining
pGCTB-SCs were seeded on poly-L-lysine (Fujifilm Wako)–coated cover glass at a density of 10 × 104 cells and cultured for 48 h. After the cells were treated with each reagent for the indicated periods, they were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (FUJIFILM Wako) for 10 min at RT, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min, and blocked with 10% goat serum (FUJIFILM Wako) for 30 min. Subsequently, the cells were incubated at 4 °C overnight with a mixture of primary antibodies diluted in 1:200 in Can Get Signal Immunostain Solution A (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan). Samples were then washed three times with PBS and incubated with Alexa Fluor® 488 and 594 diluted in 1:200 for 1 h at RT. SlowFade Diamond antifade mountant with DAPI (Invitrogen) was used as a mounting solution. Immunostaining was visualized using fluorescence microscopy (BZ-X800; Keyence).
Nuclear protein extraction and western blot analysis
pGCTB-SCs were seeded in 6-well dishes at a 1.2 × 106 cells/well density and incubated overnight. The following day, the culture media were replaced for each reagent, and the cells were incubated for an additional 12 h. After incubation, the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS, scraped, and centrifuged. Cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were isolated using nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific), to which Cell Lytic M (Sigma-Aldrich) with protease inhibitor cocktail (cOMplete™ Mini: Sigma-Aldrich) were added.
Western blotting was performed as previously described 45 with the following primary antibodies: β-catenin (1:1000) and actin clone C4 (1:5000), with or without rabbit polyclonal Lamin A/C antibody (1:3000, sc-20681; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Relative intensity was calculated using the ratio of each target protein's signal intensity to internal controls' intensity, using ImageJ ver1.52p (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). At least three separate experiments were conducted. Full-length blots were absent because membranes were cut prior to hybridization with primary antibodies. The unedited blots including replicates were shown in Supplementary Figs. S5, S6, S7.
Ethics and guidelines
All the methods were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and written informed consent was obtained from all human subjects.
Patients and quantitative CT image analysis
To evaluate nuclear β-catenin translocation in naïve GCTB clinical samples, we performed a retrospective analysis using samples of GCTB registered in the files of the Department of Anatomic and Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan 44. A total of 91 clinical samples of GCTB from 88 patients were prepared for immunohistochemistry. These tumor specimens had been acquired from biopsy or surgeries, and the existence of the H3G34W mutation had been immunohistochemically confirmed. Samples collected after denosumab treatment were excluded from the study.
Immunohistochemical staining and assessment of the nuclear β-catenin labeling index (NBLI) were performed as previously described 46,47. Histogram analysis was conducted to calculate the cut-off value for the NBLI. The presence of intra-tumoral ossification of GCTB was also assessed using H&E-stained sections.
Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with GCTB or received treatment for this cancer at our hospital between July 2011 and November 2020. Of those, 18 patients had received denosumab treatment (primary, n = 12; recurrent, n = 4; both, n = 2), and 16 had also undergone non-contrast CT or PET-CT evaluation before and after denosumab treatment. CT DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) image datasets from identified patients were analyzed using SYNAPSE VINCENT ver6.1 (VINCENT, FUJIFILM Medical Co., Ltd.). A single musculoskeletal radiologist with eight years of experience manually delineated the regions of interest (ROI) in the axial CT images of whole slices, and three-dimensional CT images were semi-automatically acquired. Slice thickness was set at 2 or 5 mm. We identified the calcified tissue volumes (≥ 130 Hounsfield Units, HU) using VINCENT histogram analysis and quantified tumor calcification using the previously described Agatston scoring system 36,48. In addition, we assessed the association between nuclear β-catenin translocation and intra-tumoral ossification of GCTB.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were repeated at least three times. Data are presented as means ± SD. Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test was used for two-group comparisons. Using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, multiple comparisons were assessed. Fisher’s exact test was used to examine the significance of the association between the categorical data. All data analyses were performed using the JMP 13 statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board in Kyushu University in Fukuoka, Japan (Approval number 26-224).
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Huang, L., Teng, X. Y., Cheng, Y. Y., Lee, K. M. & Kumta, S. M. Expression of preosteoblast markers and Cbfa-1 and Osterix gene transcripts in stromal tumour cells of giant cell tumour of bone. Bone 34, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.10.013 (2004).
Raskin, K. A., Schwab, J. H., Mankin, H. J., Springfield, D. S. & Hornicek, F. J. Giant cell tumor of bone. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 21, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-02-118 (2013).
Matsumoto, Y. et al. Role of the VEGF-Flt-1-FAK pathway in the pathogenesis of osteoclastic bone destruction of giant cell tumors of bone. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 5, 85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799x-5-85 (2010).
Palmerini, E. et al. Role of (Neo)adjuvant denosumab for giant cell tumor of bone. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 21, 68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-020-00766-4 (2020).
Noh, B. J. & Park, Y. K. Giant cell tumor of bone: Updated molecular pathogenesis and tumor biology. Hum. Pathol. 81, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2018.06.017 (2018).
Yamamoto, H. et al. Diagnostic utility of histone H3.3 G34W, G34R, and G34V mutant-specific antibodies for giant cell tumors of bone. Hum. Pathol. 73, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2017.11.020 (2018).
Steensma, M. R. et al. Targeting the giant cell tumor stromal cell: functional characterization and a novel therapeutic strategy. PLoS ONE 8, e69101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069101 (2013).
Salerno, M., Avnet, S., Alberghini, M., Giunti, A. & Baldini, N. Histogenetic characterization of giant cell tumor of bone. Clin. Orthop. Relat Res. 466, 2081–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0327-z (2008).
Behjati, S. et al. Distinct H3F3A and H3F3B driver mutations define chondroblastoma and giant cell tumor of bone. Nat. Genet. 45, 1479–1482. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2814 (2013).
Luke, J. et al. H3F3A mutation in giant cell tumour of the bone is detected by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody against the G34W mutated site of the histone H3.3 variant. Histopathology 71, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13190 (2017).
Fellenberg, J. et al. Knock-down of oncohistone H3F3A-G34W counteracts the neoplastic phenotype of giant cell tumor of bone derived stromal cells. Cancer Lett. 448, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2019.02.001 (2019).
Sobti, A., Agrawal, P., Agarwala, S. & Agarwal, M. Giant cell tumor of bone—An overview. Archiv. Bone Joint Surg. 4, 2–9 (2016).
Cowan, R. W. & Singh, G. Giant cell tumor of bone: a basic science perspective. Bone 52, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.002 (2013).
Lujic, N., Sopta, J., Kovacevic, R., Stevanovic, V. & Davidovic, R. Recurrence of giant cell tumour of bone: Role of p53, cyclin D1, beta-catenin and Ki67. Int. Orthop. 40, 2393–2399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3292-2 (2016).
Branstetter, D. G. et al. Denosumab induces tumor reduction and bone formation in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone. Clin. Cancer Res. 18, 4415–4424. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0578 (2012).
Thomas, D. et al. Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: An open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 11, 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(10)70010-3 (2010).
Urakawa, H. et al. Clinical outcome of primary giant cell tumor of bone after curettage with or without perioperative denosumab in Japan: From a questionnaire for JCOG 1610 study. World J. Surg. Oncol. 16, 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1459-6 (2018).
Ueda, T. et al. Objective tumor response to denosumab in patients with giant cell tumor of bone: A multicenter phase II trial. Ann Oncol 26, 2149–2154. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv307 (2015).
Huvos, A. G. Bone tumors: Diagnosis, treatment and prognosis Second edition. (WB Saunders CBS Educ and Professional Publ, 1987).
Fornasier, V. L., Protzner, K., Zhang, I. & Mason, L. The prognostic significance of histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry in giant cell tumors of bone. Hum Pathol 27, 754–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90445-1 (1996).
Kato, I. et al. Giant cell tumours of bone treated with denosumab: histological, immunohistochemical and H3F3A mutation analyses. Histopathology 72, 914–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13448 (2018).
Murata, A., Fujita, T., Kawahara, N., Tsuchiya, H. & Tomita, K. Osteoblast lineage properties in giant cell tumors of bone. J Orthop Sci 10, 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-005-0946-0 (2005).
Cai, T. et al. WNT/beta-catenin signaling promotes VSMCs to osteogenic transdifferentiation and calcification through directly modulating Runx2 gene expression. Exp. Cell Res. 345, 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2016.06.007 (2016).
Gaur, T. et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 33132–33140. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M500608200 (2005).
Komori, T. Runx2, an inducer of osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation. Histochem. Cell Biol. 149, 313–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-018-1640-6 (2018).
Wan, Y. et al. beta-catenin is a valuable marker for differential diagnosis of osteoblastoma and osteosarcoma. Hum. Pathol. 45, 1459–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2014.02.022 (2014).
Wu, X. et al. Rac1 activation controls nuclear localization of beta-catenin during canonical Wnt signaling. Cell 133, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.052 (2008).
Kim, J. H. et al. Wnt signaling in bone formation and its therapeutic potential for bone diseases. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 5, 13–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X12466608 (2013).
D’Alimonte, I. et al. Wnt signaling behaves as a “master regulator” in the osteogenic and adipogenic commitment of human amniotic fluid mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Rev. 9, 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12015-013-9436-5 (2013).
Regard, J. B., Zhong, Z., Williams, B. O. & Yang, Y. Wnt signaling in bone development and disease: Making stronger bone with Wnts. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a007997. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a007997 (2012).
Matsubayashi, S. et al. Immunohistochemical analyses of beta-catenin and cyclin D1 expression in giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB): A possible role of Wnt pathway in GCTB tumorigenesis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 205, 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2009.02.011 (2009).
Nishiya, N. et al. A zebrafish chemical suppressor screening identifies small molecule inhibitors of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Chem. Biol. 21, 530–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.02.015 (2014).
Joyce, P. L. & Cox, A. D. Rac1 and Rac3 are targets for geranylgeranyltransferase I inhibitor-mediated inhibition of signaling, transformation, and membrane ruffling. Can. Res. 63, 7959–7967 (2003).
Stein, G. S., Lian, J. B., Stein, J. L., Van Wijnen, A. J. & Montecino, M. Transcriptional control of osteoblast growth and differentiation. Physiol. Rev. 76, 593–629. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1996.76.2.593 (1996).
Masui, F., Ushigome, S. & Fujii, K. Giant cell tumor of bone: an immunohistochemical comparative study. Pathol. Int. 48, 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1827.1998.tb03918.x (1998).
Agatston, A. S. et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 15, 827–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t (1990).
Mak, I. W., Evaniew, N., Popovic, S., Tozer, R. & Ghert, M. A translational study of the neoplastic cells of giant cell tumor of bone following neoadjuvant denosumab. J. Bone Joint. Surg. Am. 96, e127. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01332 (2014).
Xie, W., Zhang, W., Sun, M., Lu, C. & Shen, Y. Deacetylmycoepoxydiene is an agonist of Rac1, and simultaneously induces autophagy and apoptosis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 102, 5965–5975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9058-6 (2018).
Jin, H. et al. miR-125a promotes the progression of giant cell tumors of bone by stimulating IL-17A and β-catenin expression. Mol. Ther. Nucl. Acids 13, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2018.09.021 (2018).
Sonomoto, K. et al. Interleukin-1β induces differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteoblasts via the Wnt-5a/receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2 pathway. Arthrit. Rheum. 64, 3355–3363. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.34555 (2012).
Morgan, T. et al. Molecular profiling of giant cell tumor of bone and the osteoclastic localization of ligand for receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB. Am. J. Pathol. 167, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62959-8 (2005).
Khazaei, S. et al. H3.3 G34W promotes growth and impedes differentiation of osteoblast-like mesenchymal progenitors in giant cell tumor of bone. Cancer Discov. 10, 1968–1987. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-0461 (2020).
Setsu, N. et al. The Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is activated and associated with adverse prognosis in soft tissue leiomyosarcomas. Cancer 118, 1637–1648. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26448 (2012).
Yahiro, K. et al. Class III β-tubulin overexpression induces chemoresistance to eribulin in a leiomyosarcoma cell line. Anal. Cell. Pathol. 1–11, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8987568 (2018).
Fujiwara-Okada, Y. et al. Y-box binding protein-1 regulates cell proliferation and is associated with clinical outcomes of osteosarcoma. Br. J. Cancer 108, 836–847. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2012.579 (2013).
Sato, M. et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signal alteration and its diagnostic utility in basal cell adenoma and histologically similar tumors of the salivary gland. Pathol. Res. Pract. 214, 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2017.12.016 (2018).
Takahashi, H. et al. Possible role of nuclear β-catenin in resistance to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Histopathology 71, 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13227 (2017).
Ricalde, A., Allison, M., Rifkin, D. & Shaw, R. Anthropometric measures of obesity and renal artery calcification: Results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 271, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.02.031 (2018).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers: JP18K16627 and JP19K16802) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The role of the funding body was purchase of test reagents in the collection of data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: M.Y., T.Y., Y.H., N.M., S.N.; Acquisition of data: K.A., T.Y., K.Y., S.E., K.M.; Analysis and interpretation of data: M.Y., Y.K., S.E., K.M., O.R., N.M., S.N.; Drafting of manuscript: K.A., M.Y.; Supervision: OY, N.Y., F.S., N.M., F.T.; The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kimura, A., Toda, Y., Matsumoto, Y. et al. Nuclear β-catenin translocation plays a key role in osteoblast differentiation of giant cell tumor of bone. Sci Rep 12, 13438 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17728-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17728-5
- Springer Nature Limited