Elevated plasma level of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal on admission is an independent biomarker of mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients

Alomar, Fadhel A.; Alshakhs, Marai N.; Abohelaika, Salah; Almarzouk, Hassan M.; Almualim, Mohammed; Al-Ali, Amein K.; Al-Muhanna, Fahad; Alomar, Mohammed F.; Alhaddad, Mousa J.; Almulaify, Mohammed S.; Alessa, Faisal S.; Alsalman, Ahmed S.; Alaswad, Ahmed; Bidasee, Sean R.; Alsaad, Hassan A.; Alali, Rudaynah A.; AlSheikh, Mona H.; Akhtar, Mohammed S.; Al Mohaini, Mohammed; Alsalman, Abdulkhaliq J.; Alturaifi, Hussain; Bidasee, Keshore R.

doi:10.1038/s41598-022-12751-y

Elevated plasma level of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal on admission is an independent biomarker of mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients

Article
Open access
Published: 09 June 2022

Volume 12, article number 9510, (2022)
Cite this article

Download PDF

You have full access to this open access article

Scientific Reports

Elevated plasma level of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal on admission is an independent biomarker of mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients

Download PDF

Fadhel A. Alomar¹^na1,
Marai N. Alshakhs²^na1,
Salah Abohelaika³^na1,
Hassan M. Almarzouk²,
Mohammed Almualim⁴,
Amein K. Al-Ali⁵,
Fahad Al-Muhanna⁵,
Mohammed F. Alomar⁵,
Mousa J. Alhaddad²,
Mohammed S. Almulaify²,
Faisal S. Alessa²,
Ahmed S. Alsalman²,
Ahmed Alaswad³,
Sean R. Bidasee⁶,
Hassan A. Alsaad¹,
Rudaynah A. Alali⁵,
Mona H. AlSheikh⁵,
Mohammed S. Akhtar⁵,
Mohammed Al Mohaini⁷,
Abdulkhaliq J. Alsalman⁸,
Hussain Alturaifi⁹ &
…
Keshore R. Bidasee⁶

2330 Accesses
3 Altmetric
Explore all metrics

Abstract

Biomarkers to identify ICU COVID-19 patients at high risk for mortality are urgently needed for therapeutic care and management. Here we found plasma levels of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal (MG) were 4.4-fold higher in ICU patients upon admission that later died (n = 33), and 1.7-fold higher in ICU patients that survived (n = 32),compared to uninfected controls (n = 30). The increased MG in patients that died correlated inversely with the levels of the MG-degrading enzyme glyoxalase-1 (r² = − 0.50), and its co-factor glutathione (r² = − 0.63), and positively with monocytes (r² = 0.29). The inflammation markers, SSAO (r² = 0.52), TNF-α (r² = 0.41), IL-1β (r² = 0.25), CRP (r² = 0.26) also correlated positively with MG. Logistic regression analysis provides evidence of a significant relationship between the elevated MG upon admission into ICU and death (P < 0.0001), with 42% of the death variability explained. From these data we conclude that elevated plasma MG on admission is a novel independent biomarker that predicts mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients.

Is glucose-6-phosphatase dehydrogenase deficiency associated with severe outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients?

Article Open access 28 September 2021

Early changes in laboratory parameters are predictors of mortality and ICU admission in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Article Open access 21 November 2020

Impact of decreased levels of total CO2 on in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19

Article Open access 04 October 2023

Introduction

The new coronavirus, termed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has claimed the lives of 6.2 million deaths worldwide. As of May 20th, 2022, more than 520 million individuals have been infected and 11.4 billion doses of vaccines have been administered¹. Most individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 remain asymptomatic or develop mild symptoms including fever, cough, muscle weakness, headache, sore throat, diarrhea, and loss of taste and smell. However, about 10% of individuals develop acute respiratory distress (ARDS) requiring intensive care unit (ICU) hospitalization^2,3,4,5. This population includes those with advanced age, pre-existing medical conditions including cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes mellitus and the unvaccinated^6,7,8,9. Moreover, individuals with chronic diabetes mellitus (DM) are three times more likely to die from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compared to infected individuals without DM^10,11,12. In addition, many ICU patients that survived also develop post-COVID syndrome or long COVID whose symptoms include persistent cognitive impairment, immunosuppression, lung damage, heart, kidney, and vascular diseases^13,14.

Because the number of COVID-19 patients requiring ICU treatment is extremely large (~ 10% of all infections) and can exceed the capacity of most hospitals, biomarkers are currently used to assist with stratifying and triage patients for management and care. Existing biomarkers fall into five broad categories: (1) hematological/coagulation markers including platelet to lymphocyte ratios, ferritin and D-dimer, (2) inflammation markers including serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, interleukins (IL), IL-1b, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-17, CXCL10/IP-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), (3) cardiac dysfunction markers including troponin I (cTnI), N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (α-HBDH) and creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB), (4) liver function markers including aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), and serum albumin, and (5) renal function markers including glomerular filtration rate and blood urea nitrogen^15,16,17. In a meta-analysis of thirty-two studies, Malik and colleagues found significant associations between blood lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated CRP, procalcitonin, lactate dehydrogenase, D-dimer, ALT, and AST with adverse COVID-19 outcomes. Only four of these thirty-two studies reported ICU death as an endpoint¹⁸. In another report, Narvel and colleagues indicated that although currently used biomarkers are useful for stratifying/triaging patients for ICU admittance, they are not specific for SARS-CoV-2¹⁹. Biomarkers associated with replication of SARS-CoV-2 and responses of the host cells to the infection could provide objective and unbiased information to health care professionals to better manage and predict outcomes of ICU COVID-19 patients. These markers may also provide insights into new strategies to attenuate the acute and long-term complications arising from SARS-CoV-2 infection.

SARS-CoV-2 infects human cells that express the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) including pneumocytes, endothelial cells, and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)^20,21,22. Like most viruses, after entry SARS-CoV-2 reprograms metabolism in the infected cells to obtain the building blocks needed for replication. These metabolic changes include upregulating glycolysis for faster production of ATP, upregulating the oxidative arm of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) for synthesis of nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids, and attenuating oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria of the infected host cells^23,24,25. In addition to metabolic changes in the infected cells, the immune cells of the host also upregulate these pathways to orchestrate their highly specific series of responses to clear SARS-CoV-2 infection and repair the cellular damages^{26,27,28,29,30}. On sensing pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), the rapid response neutrophils move to the infected site (cells) to start the viral elimination process using multiple mechanisms including phagocytosis, oxidative burst, and the release of elastase and myeloperoxidase via azurophilic granules^31,32. Polarized M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages rearrange their metabolism to utilize glycolysis rather than oxidative phosphorylation for rapid ATP synthesis, and the PPP for the oxidative burst needed for destroying the infectious agent³⁰. The latter process is commonly termed the Warburg effect²⁸. M1 macrophages also upregulate glycolysis by increasing hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1α (HIF-1α) and glycolysis-related proteins in an O₂-independent manner^28,33. Danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from damaged and dying cells also activate Toll-like receptors and inflammasomes to increase inflammation and oxidative stress³⁴.

In addition to ATP, anaerobic glycolysis also generates the highly cytotoxic byproduct, methylglyoxal (MG) from the interconversion of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate and dihydroxyacetone phosphate by topoisomerase-1 (TPI-1)³⁵. In healthy, uninfected individuals, plasma and tissue of MG levels are kept low by the actions of dual-enzyme glyoxalase system³⁶. In the first step, the rate-limiting enzyme glyoxalase-I, (GLOI, EC4.4.1.5, Glo-I) converts a hemithioacetal formed between MG and glutathione (GSH) into S, D-lactoylglutathione. In the second step, S, D-lactoylglutathione is degraded by glyoxalase-II (GLOII, EC3.1.2.6, Glo-II) in the presence of H₂O to D-lactic acid³⁷. Reduced glutathione is synthesized in two steps. In the first step, glutamine and cysteine are converted into γ-glutamylcysteine by γ-glutamate cysteine ligase. In the second step, γ-glutamylcysteine and glycine are converted into glutathione by the enzyme glutathione synthase³⁸. Expression of rate-limiting Glo1 is negatively regulated by the inflammation oxidative stress, and hypoxia^39,40,41 conditions that are commonly seen in COVID-19 patients. The increase in oxidative stress will also increase demand for GSH. The increase in MG synthesis arising from upregulation of glycolysis coupled with decreases in free GSH and Glo1 levels should lead to accumulation of MG in blood and tissues of COVID-19 patients. At supraphysiologic levels, MG disrupts the function of endothelial and epithelial cells, resulting in microvascular leakage, and clots^42,43,44,45. Supraphysiological levels of MG will also potentiate inflammation in many cell types by activating NF-κB⁴⁶, the NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NRLP3) inflammasome⁴⁷, and by inducing expression of the ectoenzyme vascular adhesion protein 1 and its cleaved analog semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO)⁴⁸. Elevated MG is also an underlying cause for tissue fibrosis⁴⁹, a pathobiology reported in COVID-19 patients.

To this end, a cross-sectional study was conducted to (i) determine if MG levels are elevated in plasma of ICU COVID-19 patients upon admittance, and (ii) determine if elevation in plasma MG on admittance is predictive of subsequent death. Glutathione, Glo1, and immune cells were also measured to gain insight into mechanisms that contribute to MG accumulation. The inflammation markers SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β and CRP were also measured to determine their relationship with plasma MG.

Results

Characterization of patients used in study

The general characteristics and medication history of patients used for this study are shown in Table 1. The sixty-five ICU patients were separated into those with diabetes mellitus (DM) and those without diabetes mellitus (non-DM) (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the mean age and weights of uninfected DM patients and infected patients. Uninfected individuals without DM were slightly younger and weighed less than ICU patients. There were twice as many males than females in this cohort of patients. A higher percentage of non-DM patients were on antiviral regimens than DM patients (41% vs 12%). Similar percentages of non-DM than DM patients were on antibiotics and steroids. Co-morbidities are also shown in Table 1. Of the thirty-four non-DM patients, sixteen died (47%), and seventeen of thirty-one DM patients died (55%).

Table 1 Demographic data of the uninfected controls and ICU COVID-19 patients.

Full size table

The blood analyte profile of patients used in this study are shown in Table 2. They were divided into five groups: individual tests, blood cell/coagulation parameters, renal function parameters, liver function parameters and lipid profiles. Blood glucose levels in ICU COVID-19 patients without DM were higher than that of un-infected individuals. Neutrophils were higher, and lymphocytes basophils and eosinophils were lower in ICU COVID-19 patients. There were no changes in monocytes levels between non-infected controls and ICU COVID-19 patients. Ferritin was also elevated, and hemoglobin and hematocrit were lower in ICU COVID-19 patients. There were no significant differences in Na⁺, K⁺, Cl⁻, Ca²⁺, phosphorous, and Mg²⁺ levels between uninfected and ICU COVID-19 patients. However, albumin levels were lower, and urea was higher. Liver enzymes were also higher in ICU COVID-19 patients.

Table 2 Analytes in blood of uninfected (control and DM) and ICU COVID-19 patients.

Full size table

Plasma levels of MG, glutathione, Glo1, SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP in ICU COVID-19 patients

Plasma levels of MG, glutathione, and the inflammation markers SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP, but not Glo1, were significantly higher in all ICU patients compared to uninfected individuals (Fig. 1A–G). MG was significantly higher (77%), and glutathione and Glo1 were significantly lower (44% and 43% respectively) in plasma in patients that died compared to ICU patients that survived (Fig. 2A–C). There were no significant differences in plasma levels of SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, and CRP between patients that died and survived (Fig. 2D–G).

Immune cells in ICU COVID-19 patients

Since upregulation of glycolysis in immune cells is required to orchestrate their highly specific series of responses to clear viral infection and repair cellular damage, we measured immune cells levels in ICU patients. Neutrophils were significantly higher, and lymphocytes, basophils, and eosinophils were significantly lower in ICU COVID-19 patients compared to uninfected individuals (Fig. 3A,B,D,E, respectively). No significant difference was found in the amounts of monocytes in ICU COVID-19 patients compared to uninfected controls (Fig. 3C). When ICU patients were separated into those that survived and died, there were no significant differences in the amounts of lymphocytes, basophils, and eosinophils (Fig. 4B,D,E). However, the amounts of neutrophils and monocytes were significantly higher in patients that died. (Fig. 4A,C).

Plasma levels of MG, glutathione, Glo1, SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP in non-DM, uninfected DM and ICU COVID-19 patients

Studies have shown that patients with DM are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes compared with non-DM patients^11,12,13. In this study, MG was 2.7-fold higher (1326 μg/ml HSA-MG in uninfected DM vs 495 μg/ml HSA-MG in uninfected control, P < 0.05), and glutathione was 2.3-fold (342 nmol/ml uninfected DM vs 777 nmol/ml in uninfected control, P < 0.05) lower in uninfected DM patients compared to uninfected non-DM patients (Fig. 5A,C). However, there was no significant difference in Glo1 levels between uninfected non-DM and uninfected DM patients (45 ng/ml uninfected DM vs 42 ng/ml in uninfected control) (Fig. 5E). MG was also significantly higher in COVID-19 DM ICU patients compared to uninfected DM patients (Fig. 5A). There were no significant differences in plasma levels of MG, glutathione, Glo1, and CRP between non-DM and DM patients upon ICU admittance (Figs. 5A,C,E, 6G). However, SSAO, TNF-α and IL-1β were significantly higher in plasma of DM ICU patients than non-DM ICU patients (Fig. 6A,C,E).

When non-DM and DM ICU patients were further subdivided into those that survived and died, plasma MG was significantly higher, and glutathione and Glo1 were significantly lower in non-DM and DM that died compared to ICU patients that survived (Fig. 5B,D,F). There were no differences between SSAO, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels between non-DM and DM patients that survived and died (Fig. 6B,D,F). CRP was higher in DM ICU patients that died than in DM patients that survived (Fig. 6H).

Plasma levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils and eosinophils in non-DM, uninfected DM and ICU COVID-19 patients

Next, we investigated whether neutrophils lymphocytes, monocytes basophils, and eosinophils levels are altered in non-DM and DM patients that survived and died. Compared to uninfected non-DM patients, the amount of neutrophil was higher, and the amounts of lymphocytes and eosinophils were lower in both non-DM and DM ICU patients, but not monocytes (Figs. 7A,C and 8C). Basophils levels were also significantly lower in DM but not in non-DM ICU patients compared to uninfected non-DM patients (Fig. 8A). In this study, there were also no significant differences in the amounts of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes basophils and eosinophils between non-DM and DM COVID-19 patients (Figs. 7A,C,E, 8A,C). When non-DM and DM ICU patients were further subdivided into those that survived and died, we found higher levels of neutrophils in DM ICU patients that died compared to those that survived (Fig. 7B), and higher levels in monocytes in both non-DM and DM that died compared to non-DM and DM that survived (Fig. 7F). There were no significant differences in the number of lymphocytes and basophils in non-DM and DM COVID-19 ICU patients that died and survived (Figs. 7D, 8B) There was trend towards more eosinophils DM ICU patients that died compared to DM ICU patients that survived, but the data was not significant (P > 0.05, Fig. 8D).

Mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients with low and high plasma MG

Plasma MG levels were used to further separate ICU patients that survived into those with low MG (up to twofold higher than that in uninfected non-DM) and moderate MG (2–threefold higher than uninfected non-DM). MG level in uninfected non-DM 495 μg/ml HSA-MG, “□”) was used as the reference. For comparison, we also included MG levels in uninfected DM patients, “⋄” (Fig. 9A). All patients with low plasma MG upon admittance (11/65, 17%), were discharged from ICU. The median time to discharge was 7 days, range of 5–22 days. Patients (21/65, 32%) with moderate MG levels that survived had a mean time to discharge of 8.5 days, with a range of 3–32 days.

Patients that died were also divided into two group. The first group contained patients with MG less than fourfold than uninfected controls (moderate MG patients), and the second group contained patients with MG > fourfold than uninfected controls (high MG patients), Fig. 9A. In all patients with moderate MG that died, median time to death (13/65, 20%) was 25 days, range 14–31 days, and in the second group (20/65, 31%), the median time to death was 14 days with a range of 9–26 days. Figure 9B–D shows Kaplan–Meier curves for all patients, non-DM patients that died, and DM that died, respectively. These data show that the higher the plasma MG, the earlier the onset of death, regardless of whether the patient had DM or not.

A forward selection logistic regression model indicates evidence of a significant relationship between MG and COVID-19 patients (chi-square = 24.90, df = 1, P < 0.0001). Dead patients were found to have significantly higher MG (P < 0.0001) compared to their survived counterparts. The model correctly predicted 67% of death cases and explained 42% of the variability.

Correlations between MG, glutathione, Glo1, SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP, age and immune cells in ICU COVID-19 patients that died

Next, we investigated correlations between plasma levels of glutathione, Glo1, age and immune cells with MG levels to gain insights into reasons for MG accumulation, with glutathione, Glo1, age and immune cells as independent variables. Since MG induces inflammation^43,46 we also investigated correlations between plasma MG and SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, and CRP levels with MG as the independent variable. In this study, strong inverse correlations were found between plasma MG and glutathione (r² = − 0.63) and Glo1 (r² = − 0.50), Fig. 10A,B. A weaker but significant positive correlation was also found between MG and age of patient (Fig. 10C). Strong positive correlation between plasma MG and SSAO (r² = 0.52) and moderate correlation with TNF-α (r² = 0.41) were found (Fig. 10D,E). Weaker but significant correlations were also observed with IL-1β (r² = 0.25), and CRP (r² = 0.26) (Fig. 10F,G). A strong positive correlation was also found between the number of monocytes and plasma MG levels in ICU patients that died (Fig. 11C). There were no significant correlations between MG and neutrophils, lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, neutrophil:lymphocyte and neutrophil:monocyte and lymphocyte:monocyte ratios (Fig. 11A,B,D–H).

Discussion

About 10% of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop ARDS requiring intensive care hospitalization^3,4,5. About 50% of COVID-19 ICU patients will also die⁵⁰. To date, biomarkers to predict which ICU COVID-19 patients are at high risk of mortality are insufficient^{4,15,16,17,18,19}. The principal finding of this cross-sectional study is that high plasma levels of the glycolysis byproduct MG upon admission into ICU with ARDS is a predictor of death in COVID-19 patients. This conclusion is based on our findings that mean plasma MG of COVID-19 patients admitted into the ICU that later died was 4.4-fold and 1.8-fold higher than that in uninfected non-DM controls and uninfected DM individuals, respectively. Similar levels of MG have been reported in plasma of uninfected controls⁵¹, Other have also reported similar fold increases in plasma MG in uninfected DM patients using other assay methods^52,53,54. Mean plasma MG in COVID-19 patients on admission into ICU that survived, was 2.5-fold higher than that of uninfected non-DM controls, and not significantly different to that of uninfected DM patients.

Others have shown that glycolysis and the oxidative arm of the PPP are upregulated in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells to provide the substrates needed for replication^55,56, and in immune cells to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 infection and repair any cellular damage^27,28,29. As such, we concluded that MG synthesis is likely increasing in COVID-19 patients. In this study, we focused on whether MG degradation is being compromised in COVID-19 ICU patients. We found that plasma levels of glutathione, and Glo1 were significantly lower in ICU COVID-19 patients that died compared to ICU COVID-19 patients that survived. In an earlier report Horowitz et al.⁵⁷ showed that oral and intravenous glutathione and the glutathione precursors (N-acetylcysteine) attenuated activation of NF-κB, cytokine storm syndrome and respiratory distress syndrome seen in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. Thus, it is likely that intravenous glutathione and the glutathione precursors (N-acetylcysteine) administration were alleviating the oxidative stress and providing the glutathione needed for the formation of MG-glutathione hemiacetal. Glutathione is synthesized in two sequential reactions. In the first reaction, γ-glutamylcysteine ligase (GCL; EC 6.3.2.2) converts l-glutamate and l-cysteine into γ-glutamylcysteine, and in the second reaction, glutathione synthetase (GSS; EC 6.3.2.3) adds glycine to γ-glutamylcysteine to form glutathione^38,58,59. In a recent study Moolamalla et al.⁵⁶ found that the modifier and catalytic subunits genes of γ-glutamylcysteine ligase were downregulated in A549 (alveolar epithelial cells derived from lung adenocarcinoma), ACE2-induced A549, and normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. These investigators also found downregulation of GSS gene in in A549, ACE2-induced A549, Calu3 (lung epithelial cells derived from lung adenocarcinoma) cells infected with SARS-CoV-2-infected and in lung biopsy from SARS-CoV-2-infected patients. Our findings are consistent with others showing that glutathione synthesis is being compromised in COVID-19 ICU patients. The increase in oxidative stress induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection may also be lowering the amount of reduced glutathione in host cells/tissues.

Additionally, we also found a reduction of plasma levels of Glo1 protein in COVID-19 patients that died. Moolamalla et al.⁵⁶ reported down regulation of Glo1 gene in ACE2 transduced A549 and Calu3 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. To date, the underlying cause(s) for the reduction plasma Glo1 levels in plasma of COVID-19 patients that died remain poorly defined. What we know is that the promoter region of human GLO1 has a functionally operative antioxidant response element (ARE)^39,40,41. Under non-stress conditions, the antioxidant transcription factor nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) binds to the ARE region of GLO1 to induce its expression. NF-κB antagonizes the binding of Nrf2 to ARE to inhibit Glo1 expression. Since activation of NF-κB is upregulated in COVID-19 patients⁶⁰, the increase in activated NF-κB could also account in part for the reduction plasma Glo1. HIF-1α also binds to the ARE of GLO1 to suppress Glo1 expression^39,41. HIF-1α is one of the two subunits of the heterodimeric transcription factor that regulates cellular and systemic adaptive responses to low oxygen (hypoxia)^24,28,30,33. HIF-α stabilization can also occur under normoxia during immunity and inflammation via upregulation of PI3K, AKT, mTOR, and STAT3 pathways in polarized M1 macrophages³⁰. When oxygen delivery is compromised as is the case with respiratory distress syndrome and ischemia in COVID-19, HIF-1α escapes degradation, allowing it to migrate to the nucleus and induce transcription of HIF-1α target genes, including those involved in glycolysis and erythropoiesis^33,61,62. The increase in glycolysis and suppression of Glo1 expression by HIF-1α inadvertently leads to an increase in MG. To the best of our knowledge, there is no published literature on linking HIF-1α upregulation and elevation in MG in COVID-19 patients.

In ICU patients that died, we also found blood neutrophils were 450% (P < 0.0001) and monocytes were 20% (P < 0.05) higher than that in non-infected controls. Lymphocytes and eosinophils were also 37% and 68% lower than that in non-infected controls, respectively. Basophil levels were not significantly different between uninfected controls and ICU COVID-19 patients. Other have reported neutrophilia, lymphopenia and monocytosis in COVID-19 patients were associated with poor outcomes⁶³. While it is clear that high levels of neutrophils and monocytes arise from the body’s response to eliminate SARS-CoV-2^31,32,60,64, specific mechanisms by which neutrophilia and monocytosis contribute to poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients remain poorly understood. We posit that neutrophilia and monocytosis could be contributing to poorer outcomes in COVID-19 patients in part by increasing production of the cytotoxic glycolysis metabolite MG.

In this study, all ICU COVID-19 patients had significantly higher plasma levels of the inflammation markers originating from activation of several pathways; SSAO from increased expression of the inflammation-induced protein vascular adhesion protein-1⁴⁸, TNF-α from activation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF–κB)⁶⁵, and IL-1β from activation of the inflammasome^66,67,68 compared to uninfected non-DM individuals. However, when ICU COVID-19 patients were subdivided into those that survived and died, there were no significant differences between SSAO, TNF-α, and IL-1β, suggesting that these inflammation biomarkers are not predictive of death.

Individuals with DM are at increased risk of severe respiratory and adverse outcomes including death following SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to non-DM patients^6,10,11,12. This prompted us to separate our ICU cohorts further into non-DM and DM and with subdivision into those that survived and those that died. In this study, the amount of MG in plasma of ICU COVID-19 patients without DM were not significantly different from that in uninfected DM patients. However, ICU COVID-19 patients with DM had significantly higher levels of plasma MG than uninfected DM patients. MG levels in ICU COVID-19 with and without DM patients that died were 70% and 68% higher than that in non-DM and DM that survived, respectively. As in this study, other have also reported decreased glutathione and Glo1 level in DM patients compared to non-DM patients^69,70. However, in this study, glutathione and Glo1 levels in ICU COVID-19 patients with and without DM that died were significantly lower than that in ICU COVID-19 patients with and without DM that survived and uninfected DM, indicating that the degradation of MG is being compromised in non-DM and DM patients that died.

To gain further insight into the relationship between plasma MG levels and death, the logistic regression analysis revealed evidence of a significant relationship between MG and COVID-19 patients that died. Our model also correctly predicted 67% of death cases in ICU COVID-19 patients and explained 42% of the death variability. Correlational studies were also conducted to investigate the relationships between plasma MG as the dependent variable. We found strong inverse correlations between MG and glutathione, Glo1, and age. As an independent factor, MG also positively correlated with SSAO and TNF-α. These data suggest MG elevation is arising from both an increase in synthesis via glycolysis and from impaired degradation due to reduction in glutathione and Glo1. To the best of our knowledge, these data are the first to show that elevated plasma MG in ICU COVID-19 patients upon admission is predictive of death.

This study is not without limitations. ELISA assays were used for measuring MG (HSA-MG), Glo1, TNF-α, and IL-1β. Although the protocols for these assays were provided by the manufacturer and followed as per instruction with appropriate controls, additional work studies are needed using other methodologies, including mass spectrometry, Western blot assays and quantitative polymerase chain reactions (q-PCR) for measurements of MG, Glo1, TNF-α, and IL-1β.

In summary, the present study shows for the first time that elevation in plasma levels of the cytotoxic glycolysis metabolite MG can be used as a novel independent biomarker that predicts mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients. This elevation in MG is arising from increased glycolysis in SARS-CoV-2 infected and immune cells and from impairment in MG degradation due to down regulation of Glo1 and glutathione. Our working hypothesis is detailed in Fig. 12. Since elevated MG is cytotoxic to cells, we posit that therapeutic strategies to lower MG levels may be useful in reducing adverse clinical outcomes in SARS-CoV-2 infection. These new data suggest that post COVID syndrome may be due in part to vascular and tissue damage initiated by elevated MG levels.

Materials and methods

Study participants

This study was approved by the ethical committee of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Al Kubar (IRB # 2020-05-184), and of Qatif Central Hospital (QCH-SREC0229/2020). COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU in Qatif Central Hospital between October 2020 to Feb 2021 were recruited into this study after informed consent was taken. All ICU patients had respiratory rate ≥ 30 beats/min; blood oxygen saturation ≤ 93% at rest; arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂)/oxygen concentration (FiO₂) ratio < 300; lung infiltrates > 50% of the lung field within 24–48 h. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by two sequential real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays (Abbott Molecular Real Time SARS-CoV-2 assay, Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL, USA) from nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid swab specimens. Age, medical history, and prior medications were obtained from medical records. The attending physicians reported the outcome of the ICU patients as either dead or discharge. Uninfected volunteers (non-diabetic and diabetic) were recruited from Al-Ahsa and Qatif areas to serve as controls. All assays were performed in accordance with guidelines for handling and assaying blood samples from COVID-19 patients by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University.

Blood sampling

Two blood samples were obtained by a registered nurse from COVID-19 infected patients the morning after admittance (8:00 and 9:30 a.m.) and from uninfected individuals upon arrival (also between 8:00 and 9:30 a.m.) in EDTA anticoagulant tubes. One sample of blood from each individual was sent to the hospital laboratory for measurements of glucose, hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cells, red blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils, eosinophils, platelets sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, albumin, urea, creatinine, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase, creatinine kinase-myocardial band, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, lactate, ferritin, C-reactive protein, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high density lipoprotein, and low density lipoprotein. The second blood sample from each patient was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C in a refrigerated centrifuge and plasma was collected, aliquoted and stored at − 80 °C for measurements of the following below biomarkers.

Methylglyoxal (HSA-MG equivalent) in plasma

Levels of human serum albumin-methylglyoxal adduct were measured in plasma samples using the competitive methylglyoxal (MG) ELISA kit (Hycult Biotech, Inc, Wayne, PA, USA, catalog # HIT503) based on the inhibition principle. In brief, plasma samples were thawed at room temperature and vortexed 30 s. Different standard concentrations and diluted plasma (1:5) were preincubated with labeled anti-MG trace antibody in U-shaped microtiter plate at room temperature. After 1 h, 100 μL of standard or samples mixed with tracer from the U-shaped plate were transferred in duplicate into appropriate wells in the coated microtiter plate coated with MG-adduct and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After three washing, diluted streptavidin- Horseradish peroxidase (HRP) was added to each well and plate was incubated for 60 min at room temperature. Plate was washed three time and chromogenic substrate 3,3,5,5-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) which catalyzes by HRP to generate a blue color was added. After 30 min, a 100 μL of acidic stop solution was added into each well and the absorbance at 450 nm was recorded using a using a Biotek Synergy Neo2 HTS Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Männedorf, Switzerland). A standard curve was generated, and MG-adduct concentrations were calculated.

Glyoxlase-1 (Glo1) in plasma

Glyoxalase-I (Glo1) levels in plasma from uninfected and COVID-19 were detected using commercial ELISA kits according to the manufacturer’s protocols (MyBioSource, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA, catalog # MBS2021816). Briefly, 100-μL of different concentration standards or diluted plasma samples (1:10) were added to the wells in duplicate, and the plate was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. After this, 100-μL of detection reagent A was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, the plate was washed three times and a 100-μL of detection reagent B working solution was added to each well, and the plate was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After 5 washes, 90-μL of TMB substrate solution was added into each well, incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Finally, 50-μl of stop solution was loaded into each well and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using the Biotek Synergy Neo2 HTS Multi-Mode Microplate Reader. The intensity of the color product was directly proportional to concentration of Glo-1 in plasma.

Glutathione in plasma

The total glutathione concentration in plasma was determined using the glutathione assay Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St Louis, MO, USA, catalog #. CS0260). First, the plasma samples were deproteinized with equal volume of the 5% 5-sulfosalicylic acid solution, vortexed vigorously for about 30 s, incubated for 10 min at 4 °C, centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and supernatants were collected. A glutathione standard curve from 1.56 to 50 nmol was prepared. To each well of a 96-well plate, 150 μL of working mixture and a 10 μL of standard or 100 μL of plasma were added in duplicate. Plate was incubated for 5 min at room temperature and then 50 μL of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) solution (0.16 mg/mL) was added. The absorbance at 412 nm was recorded using a microplate reader. A standard curve was generated by linear regression and glutathione concentrations were calculated.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in plasma

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) level in plasma was measured using an ELISA kit (Abcam Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA, catalog # Ab181421,) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, a 50-μL of standard or 50-μL of undiluted tested samples were added to the wells in duplicate and then a 50-μL of antibody cocktail (a mixture of capture and detector antibody) was added to each well. The plate was incubated for 1 h at room temperature on a plate shaker stetted to 400 rpm. After 3 washing, 100-μL of TMB substrate was loaded and incubated for 10 min in the dark on a plate shaker stetted to 400 rpm. Finally, 100-μL of stop solution was added to each well and the optical density (OD) was recorded at 450 nm using a Biotek ELX 800 microplate reader.

Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) levels in plasma

Plasma level of human interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) was measured according to the manufacturer’s protocols (Abcam Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA, catalog # Ab 46052). A 100-μL of standard, control and tested samples in duplicate were added to the wells. Biotinylated anti-IL-1β was then added, and the plate was incubated for 3 h at room temperature. After 3 washings, 100-μL of streptavidin- HRP solution was added into all wells and incubated for 30 min. Next, plate was washed 3 times and each well was incubated with 100 μL of TMB in the dark for 15 min at room temperature followed by 100-μL of acidic stop solution. The absorbance at 450 nm was recorded using the microplate reader.

Semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO) activity in plasma

The plasma levels of semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO) were determined using the Fluoro-SSAO assay Kit (Cell Technology, Inc. Hayward, CA USA, catalog # SSAO100-3). In this experiment, all plasma tested samples were diluted in ratio of 1:5 by reaction buffer. Since benzylamine served as a substrate for both SSAO and monoamine oxidase B, pargyline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, was then added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM to each sample and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. In a black 96-well plate, 100μL of standard or sample were added to each individual wells. Thereafter, 100μL of the reaction cocktail, a mixture of detection reagent, HRP and benzylamine were added to each well and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. After 2 h, the plate was read with excitation at 530–570 nm and emission at 590 nm using Biotek Synergy Neo2 HTS Multi-Mode Microplate Reader.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7.0 software (La Jolla, CA) and Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, and presented in text as mean \(\pm\) standard error of the mean (SEM). T-test for independent samples or one-way ANOVA with Brown-Forsythe and Bartlett tests were used for continuous data. Logistic regression analysis was also used to explore the influence of the examined variables on death/survival. Significant differences were considered at P < 0.05.

Data availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. FAA and KRB is the guarantors of this work, has full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analyses.

References

Johns Hopkins University and Medicine (2021). Coronavirus COVID-19 Global Cases by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE). https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (2021). Accessed 20 May 2022.
Pierron, D. et al. Smell and taste changes are early indicators of the COVID-19 pandemic and political decision effectiveness. Nat. Commun. 11, 5152 (2020).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Du, R. H. et al. Hospitalization and critical care of 109 decedents with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 17, 839–846 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Younis, N. K., Zareef, R. O., Maktabi, M. A. N. & Mahfouz, R. The era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A review on dynamics, clinical symptoms and complications, diagnosis, and treatment. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 25, 85–101 (2021).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Amdal, C.D. et al. Health-related quality of life issues, including symptoms, in patients with active COVID-19 or post COVID-19; a systematic literature review. Qual. Life Res. (2021).
Williamson, E. J. et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature 584, 430–436 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Velavan, T. P. et al. Host genetic factors determining COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. EBioMedicine 72, 103629 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Venkatakrishnan, A. J. et al. Mapping each pre-existing condition’s association to short-term and long-term COVID-19 complications. NPJ. Digit. Med. 4, 117 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moghadas, S.M. et al. The impact of vaccination on COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States. Clin. Infect. Dis. (2021).
Barber, T. M. COVID-19 and diabetes mellitus: Implications for prognosis and clinical management. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab. 15, 227–236 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Al-Sabah, S., Al-Haddad, M., Al-Youha, S., Jamal, M. & Almazeedi, S. COVID-19: Impact of obesity and diabetes on disease severity. Clin. Obes. 10, e12414 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Halvatsiotis, P. et al. Demographic and clinical features of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Greece: The burden of diabetes and obesity. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 166, 108331 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aiyegbusi, O. L. et al. Symptoms, complications and management of long COVID: A review. J. R. Soc. Med. 114, 428–442 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Elhiny, R., Al-Jumaili, A. A. & Yawuz, M. J. An overview of post-COVID-19 complications. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 75, e14614 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Samprathi, M. & Jayashree, M. Biomarkers in COVID-19: An up-to-date review. Front. Pediatr. 8, 607647 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Ponti, G., Maccaferri, M., Ruini, C., Tomasi, A. & Ozben, T. Biomarkers associated with COVID-19 disease progression. Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab Sci. 57, 389–399 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Topp, G. et al. Biomarkers predictive of extubation and survival of COVID-19 patients. Cureus 13, e15462 (2021).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Malik, P. et al. Biomarkers and outcomes of COVID-19 hospitalisations: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Evid. Based Med. 26, 107–108 (2021).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Narvel, H., Sayed, A., Narvel, N., Yakkali, S. & Katchi, T. Do certain biomarkers predict adverse outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019?. J. Clin. Med. Res. 13, 195–203 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, M. Y., Li, L., Zhang, Y. & Wang, X. S. Expression of the SARS-CoV-2 cell receptor gene ACE2 in a wide variety of human tissues. Infect Dis. Poverty 9, 45 (2020).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Song, J. et al. Systematic analysis of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression in salivary glands reveals underlying transmission mechanism caused by SARS-CoV-2. J. Med. Virol. 92, 2556–2566 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tumpara, S. et al. Boosted pro-inflammatory activity in human PBMCs by lipopolysaccharide and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is regulated by alpha-1 antitrypsin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22 (2021).
Mansouri, K. et al. Can a metabolism-targeted therapeutic intervention successfully subjugate SARS-COV-2? A scientific rational. Biomed. Pharmacother. 131, 110694 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Codo, A. C. et al. Elevated glucose levels favor SARS-CoV-2 infection and monocyte response through a HIF-1alpha/glycolysis-dependent axis. Cell Metab. 32, 498–499 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Krishnan, S. et al. Metabolic perturbation associated with COVID-19 disease severity and SARS-CoV-2 replication. Mol. Cell Proteom. 100159 (2021).
De Santa, F., Vitiello, L., Torcinaro, A. & Ferraro, E. The role of metabolic remodeling in macrophage polarization and its effect on skeletal muscle regeneration. Antioxid. Redox Signal 30, 1553–1598 (2019).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gauthier, T. & Chen, W. Modulation of macrophage immunometabolism: A new approach to fight infections. Front. Immunol. 13, 780839 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ferraro, E., Germano, M., Mollace, R., Mollace, V. & Malara, N. HIF-1, the warburg effect, and macrophage/microglia polarization potential role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 8841911 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Koyama, S., Ishii, K. J., Coban, C. & Akira, S. Innate immune response to viral infection. Cytokine 43, 336–341 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
McGettrick, A. F. & O’Neill, L. A. J. The Role of HIF in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell Metab. 32, 524–536 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jaillon, S. et al. Neutrophils in innate and adaptive immunity. Semin. Immunopathol. 35, 377–394 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kumar, V. & Sharma, A. Neutrophils: Cinderella of innate immune system. Int. Immunopharmacol. 10, 1325–1334 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schofield, C. J. & Ratcliffe, P. J. Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 343–354 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Frevert, C. W., Felgenhauer, J., Wygrecka, M., Nastase, M. V. & Schaefer, L. Danger-associated molecular patterns derived from the extracellular matrix provide temporal control of innate immunity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 66, 213–227 (2018).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kold-Christensen, R. & Johannsen, M. Methylglyoxal metabolism and aging-related disease: Moving from correlation toward causation. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 31, 81–92 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Thornalley, P. J. The glyoxalase system in health and disease. Mol. Aspects Med. 14, 287–371 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sousa Silva, M., Gomes, R. A., Ferreira, A. E., Ponces Freire, A. & Cordeiro, C. The glyoxalase pathway: the first hundred years... and beyond. Biochem. J. 453, 1–15 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, S. C. Glutathione synthesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 3143–3153 (1830).
Google Scholar
Antognelli, C., Palumbo, I., Aristei, C. & Talesa, V. N. Glyoxalase I inhibition induces apoptosis in irradiated MCF-7 cells via a novel mechanism involving Hsp27, p53 and NF-kappaB. Br. J. Cancer 111, 395–406 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ranganathan, S., Ciaccio, P. J., Walsh, E. S. & Tew, K. D. Genomic sequence of human glyoxalase-I: Analysis of promoter activity and its regulation. Gene 240, 149–155 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schalkwijk, C. G. & Stehouwer, C. D. A. Methylglyoxal, a highly reactive dicarbonyl compound, in diabetes, its vascular complications, and other age-related diseases. Physiol. Rev. 100, 407–461 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Alomar, F. et al. Smooth muscle-generated methylglyoxal impairs endothelial cell-mediated vasodilatation of cerebral microvessels in type 1 diabetic rats. Br. J. Pharmacol. 173, 3307–3326 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Alomar, F.A. et al. Adeno-associated viral transfer of glyoxalase-1 blunts carbonyl and oxidative stresses in hearts of type 1 diabetic rats. Antioxidants (Basel). 9 (2020).
Arriagada-Petersen, C. et al. Effect of advanced glycation end products on platelet activation and aggregation: A comparative study of the role of glyoxal and methylglyoxal. Platelets 32, 507–515 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gawlowski, T., Stratmann, B., Stirban, A. O., Negrean, M. & Tschoepe, D. AGEs and methylglyoxal induce apoptosis and expression of Mac-1 on neutrophils resulting in platelet-neutrophil aggregation. Thromb. Res. 121, 117–126 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lin, C. C. et al. Methylglyoxal activates NF-kappaB nuclear translocation and induces COX-2 expression via a p38-dependent pathway in synovial cells. Life Sci. 149, 25–33 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cepas, V. et al. In vitro evaluation of the toxicological profile and oxidative stress of relevant diet-related advanced glycation end products and related 1,2-dicarbonyls. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2021, 9912240 (2021).
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Salmi, M. & Jalkanen, S. VAP-1: An adhesin and an enzyme. Trends Immunol. 22, 211–216 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dash, P. K. et al. A link between methylglyoxal and heart failure during HIV-1 infection. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8, 792180 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Oliveira, E. et al. ICU outcomes and survival in patients with severe COVID-19 in the largest health care system in central Florida. PLoS ONE 16, e0249038 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Groningen, J.V., Schilders, G., Rutjes, H.W. & van Binsbergen, J. Hycult Biotech Inc. https://www.hycultbiotech.com/hit503 (poster HIT 503). Accessed 18 April 2022.
Reyaz, A., Alam, S., Chandra, K., Kohli, S. & Agarwal, S. Methylglyoxal and soluble RAGE in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Association with oxidative stress. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 19, 515–521 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kong, X. et al. Increased plasma levels of the methylglyoxal in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes 2. J. Diabetes 6, 535–540 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, X. J., Ma, S. B., Liu, Z. F., Li, H. & Gao, W. Y. Elevated levels of alpha-dicarbonyl compounds in the plasma of type II diabetics and their relevance with diabetic nephropathy. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 1106–1107, 19–25 (2019).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Ajaz, S. et al. Mitochondrial metabolic manipulation by SARS-CoV-2 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with COVID-19. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 320, C57–C65 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Moolamalla, S. T. R., Balasubramanian, R., Chauhan, R., Priyakumar, U. D. & Vinod, P. K. Host metabolic reprogramming in response to SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systems biology approach. Microb. Pathog 158, 105114 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Horowitz, R. I., Freeman, P. R. & Bruzzese, J. Efficacy of glutathione therapy in relieving dyspnea associated with COVID-19 pneumonia: A report of 2 cases. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 30, 101063 (2020).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carlberg, I. & Mannervik, B. Glutathione reductase. Methods Enzymol. 113, 484–490 (1985).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Seelig, G. F. & Meister, A. Glutathione biosynthesis; gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase from rat kidney. Methods Enzymol. 113, 379–390 (1985).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xia, J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 N protein induces acute lung injury in mice via NF-kB activation. Front. Immunol. 12, 791753 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, G. L., Jiang, B. H., Rue, E. A. & Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 5510–5514 (1995).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, G. L. & Semenza, G. L. Purification and characterization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1230–1237 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Henry, B. et al. Lymphopenia and neutrophilia at admission predicts severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis. Acta Biomed. 91, e2020008 (2020).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pirsalehi, A. et al. Differential alteration trend of white blood cells (WBCs) and monocytes count in severe and non-severe COVID-19 patients within a 7-day follow-up. Iran J. Microbiol. 13, 8–16 (2021).
PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Song, L. et al. Differential diagnosis and prospective grading of COVID-19 at the early stage with simple hematological and biochemical variables. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 99, 115169 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Masih, A. et al. Discovery of novel pyrazole derivatives as a potent anti-inflammatory agent in RAW264.7 cells via inhibition of NF-kB for possible benefit against SARS-CoV-2. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 35, e22656 (2021).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Su, C. M., Wang, L. & Yoo, D. Activation of NF-kappaB and induction of proinflammatory cytokine expressions mediated by ORF7a protein of SARS-CoV-2. Sci. Rep. 11, 13464 (2021).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hishida, E. et al. Crucial role of NLRP3 inflammasome in the development of peritoneal dialysis-related peritoneal fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 9, 10363 (2019).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Calabrese, V. et al. Oxidative stress, glutathione status, sirtuin and cellular stress response in type 2 diabetes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1822, 729–736 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bora, S., Adole, P. S., Motupalli, N., Pandit, V. R. & Vinod, K. V. Association between carbonyl stress markers and the risk of acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus—A pilot study. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 14, 1751–1755 (2020).
Article PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is primarily supported by a grant from the King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST # 0007-070-01-20-5) and the Deanship of Scientific Research, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (Covid19-2020-012-Med). The authors would like to express their appreciation to KACST for their continuing support throughout our work. Very special thanks to Prof. Fahad Ahmed Al-Harbi and Dr. Nuhad Abdullah Alomair. Without their endless support, encouragement, and suggestions, we could have never started and completed this work. We also thank to Husain Al-Suwaileh and Jaffar Alsaddah at Qatif Hospital, for facilitating some of the lab work.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Fadhel A. Alomar, Marai N. Alshakhs and Salah Abohelaika.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Clinical Pharmacy, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, P. O. Box 1982, Dammam, 31441, Saudi Arabia
Fadhel A. Alomar & Hassan A. Alsaad
Department of Internal Medicine, Dammam Medical Complex, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Marai N. Alshakhs, Hassan M. Almarzouk, Mousa J. Alhaddad, Mohammed S. Almulaify, Faisal S. Alessa & Ahmed S. Alsalman
Clinical Pharmacology Department, Qatif Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Qatif, Saudi Arabia
Salah Abohelaika & Ahmed Alaswad
Intenstive Care Unit, Qatif Central Hospital, Ministry of Health, Qatif, Saudi Arabia
Mohammed Almualim
College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Amein K. Al-Ali, Fahad Al-Muhanna, Mohammed F. Alomar, Rudaynah A. Alali, Mona H. AlSheikh & Mohammed S. Akhtar
Departments of Pharmacology and Experimental Neuroscience, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
Sean R. Bidasee & Keshore R. Bidasee
Basic Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia
Mohammed Al Mohaini
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Northern Border University, Rafha, Saudi Arabia
Abdulkhaliq J. Alsalman
King Fahad Hospital Hofuf, Alahsa, Saudi Arabia
Hussain Alturaifi

Authors

Fadhel A. Alomar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marai N. Alshakhs
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Salah Abohelaika
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hassan M. Almarzouk
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mohammed Almualim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Amein K. Al-Ali
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fahad Al-Muhanna
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mohammed F. Alomar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mousa J. Alhaddad
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mohammed S. Almulaify
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Faisal S. Alessa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ahmed S. Alsalman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Ahmed Alaswad
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sean R. Bidasee
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hassan A. Alsaad
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Rudaynah A. Alali
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mona H. AlSheikh
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mohammed S. Akhtar
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Mohammed Al Mohaini
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Abdulkhaliq J. Alsalman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hussain Alturaifi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Keshore R. Bidasee
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

F.A.A. and K.R.B. conceived the experiments and planned along with all other authors. F.A.A., M.N.A., S.A., A.K.A., M.F.A., A.A., H.A., S.R.B., M.A.M., A.J.A., H.A. and K.R.B. conducted experiments and performed data analyses. S.A., M.N.A., H.M.A., M.A., A.K.A., F.A., M.J.A., M.S.A., F.S.A., A.S.A., H.A.A., R.A.A., M.H.A., and M.S.A. collected and analyzed patient profile data. M.A.M., A.A., and S.A. were responsible for ICU COVID-19 and recruitment of uninfected controls. K.R.B., F.A.A., and S.A. interpreted the data, wrote, and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fadhel A. Alomar or Keshore R. Bidasee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alomar, F.A., Alshakhs, M.N., Abohelaika, S. et al. Elevated plasma level of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal on admission is an independent biomarker of mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients. Sci Rep 12, 9510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12751-y

Download citation

Received: 12 November 2021
Accepted: 03 May 2022
Published: 09 June 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12751-y
Springer Nature Limited

Elevated plasma level of the glycolysis byproduct methylglyoxal on admission is an independent biomarker of mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients

Abstract

Similar content being viewed by others

Is glucose-6-phosphatase dehydrogenase deficiency associated with severe outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients?

Early changes in laboratory parameters are predictors of mortality and ICU admission in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Impact of decreased levels of total CO2 on in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19

Introduction

Results

Characterization of patients used in study

Plasma levels of MG, glutathione, Glo1, SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP in ICU COVID-19 patients

Immune cells in ICU COVID-19 patients

Plasma levels of MG, glutathione, Glo1, SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP in non-DM, uninfected DM and ICU COVID-19 patients

Plasma levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, basophils and eosinophils in non-DM, uninfected DM and ICU COVID-19 patients

Mortality in ICU COVID-19 patients with low and high plasma MG

Correlations between MG, glutathione, Glo1, SSAO, TNF-α, IL-1β, CRP, age and immune cells in ICU COVID-19 patients that died

Discussion

Materials and methods

Study participants

Blood sampling

Methylglyoxal (HSA-MG equivalent) in plasma

Glyoxlase-1 (Glo1) in plasma

Glutathione in plasma

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in plasma

Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) levels in plasma

Semicarbazide-sensitive amine oxidase (SSAO) activity in plasma

Statistical analyses

Data availability

References

Acknowledgements

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Contributions

Corresponding authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Additional information

Publisher's note

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Share this article

Search

Navigation