Abstract
The chemical shift of core level binding energies makes electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) a workhorse analytical tool for science and industry. For some elements, close lying and overlapping spectral features within the natural life time broadening restrict applications. We establish how the core level binding energy chemical shift can be picked up experimentally by the additional selectivity through Auger electron photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS). Coincident measurement of Ni 3p photoemission with different MVV Auger regions from specific decay channels, narrows the 3p core-levels to a width of 1.2 eV, resolves the spin–orbit splitting of 1.6 eV and determines the chemical shift of Ni 3p levels of a Ni(111) single crystal and its oxidized surface layer to 0.6 eV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA) is a powerful analytical tool1. For overlapping spectral lines the natural life time broadening hampers for some elements the chemical shift determination in classical ESCA. For example, detailed electronic structure determination and chemical state analysis for Nickel based materials at the spin orbit split Ni \(3p_{3/2}\) and \(3p_{1/2}\) (M-edge) core levels have been limited by this condition, despite the fact that they provide important information about the nature of correlation effects2,3,4,5,6,7. Thus, photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) experiments typically focus on either the valence band or the 2p core-levels, where the satellites are well known. The 3p core-levels however are less explored, since the \(3p_{1/2}\) and \(3p_{3/2}\) spectral ESCA features massively overlap, due to the small spin–orbit splitting and large lifetime broadening. Especially in Ni, the reported widths and positions of the 3p core-levels show large variations depending on the experiment and analysis8,9,10,11. Also the core-hole decay in 3d metals is excessively studied using Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and Auger electron photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS) giving access to two-hole final states12,13,14. Similar to ESCA in case of Ni AES, most work is devoted to the LVV Auger decay2,7,15,16 and only few investigations have been done studying the MVV or MVV super Coster–Kronig decay8,17.
Adsorption of \(\hbox {N}_2\), \(\hbox {O}_2\), C or H on Ni surfaces was extensively studied by the electron spectroscopy community, due to a wide range of structural and electronic modifications21,22,23,24. As for the pure Ni, most spectroscopic studies concentrated on the L edge or the valence band. This is due to the distinct additional features and chemical shifts corresponding to the modification of the chemical environment. Especially NiO stands out, since some transition metal oxides are considered as prototypical Mott-insulators25,26. Thus, the oxidation process of the surface, the electronic structure as well as the chemical shifts were well investigated utilizing ESCA and AES, focusing on the 2p core-levels, the valence band and the LVV Auger decay27,28,29.
Despite the large interest in NiO, the 3p levels are scarcely investigated. A. M. Venezia and C. M. Loxton30 reported a chemical shift of the Ni 3p levels about 1.5 eV towards higher binding energies in the \(\hbox {Ni}_3\)Al alloy, while N. S. McIntyre11 reported a shift of about 1 eV in NiO and 1.7 eV in Ni(OH)\(_2\), both utilizing conventional PES.
APECS is especially well suited to study oxidized surfaces, since on the one hand it provides an extraordinary surface sensitivity, and on the other hand it allows to disentangle features corresponding to different two-hole final states31. Other studies demonstrated the capabilities of the method and could separate bulk and surface components on Ta and TaC32,33 or study the double photoemission or 3p core-hole relaxation on Cu34,35,36. Also coincidence studies on oxidized metals and semiconductors were performed, where different species of oxidized Al and Si could be identified37,38,39.
In this work, we establish Auger electron photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS) as a powerful tool to determine chemical ESCA shifts previously inaccessible with the example of Ni 3p core-levels in coincidence with the MVV Auger electrons of a Ni(111) single crystal exposed to residual atmospheric gases at cryogenic temperature. Due to the coincidence technique, which allows to reduce the width of the ESCA spectrum by selecting specific final states40, the 3p core-levels could be narrowed to 1.2 eV FWHM. Thus the spin–orbit splitting of 1.6 eV could be resolved and a chemical shift of 0.6 eV determined for the Ni 3p levels of a Ni(111) single crystal and its oxidized surface layer.
Figure 1 depicts a schematic of the coincidence technique and energy levels to assist the comprehension of the experiment and the presented data. As shown the photoionization and the corresponding decay can take place either on the bulk atoms or the surface Ni atoms leading to different spectral features. Selecting specific Auger channels measured in coincidence with the Ni 3p photoelectrons we disentangled the photoelectron peaks corresponding to the bulk or the surface component, which are chemically shifted against each other.
Methods
In an APECS experiment Auger- and photoelectrons originating from the same ionization event are measured simultaneously using two or more electron spectrometers. The data was obtained at the CoESCA end-station41 at the BESSY II UE-52 PGM beamline utilizing the Pulse Picking by Resonant Excitation method42 during multi-bunch operation. The main chamber is equipped with two angular resolved time-of-flight spectrometers (ArTOF)43,44. Those are well suited for electron–electron coincidence measurement, since this detector type provides a good timing resolution45,46, high transmission and allows for single shot computation. Thus, for a coincidence experiment no additional setup is required, since the same trigger synchronized with the X-ray pulses is used for both spectrometers. For the APECS measurement, the photon excitation energy was set to \(h\nu =250\,{\text {eV}}\) with horizontal polarization, where one ArTOF was set to detect Ni 3p photoelectrons, and the second to detect the MVV Auger electrons. One spectrometer was aligned to detect electrons in a 176–183 eV kinetic energy window, which covers the full 3p photoelectron spectrum. The second spectrometer was aligned to detect electrons in a 53–60 eV kinetic energy window, which covers partly the MVV Auger electrons. For the calibration of the energy scale tabulated values were used17,47. In both cases the energy scales are referenced to the Fermi level. The total experimental energy resolution for both spectra is about 0.3 eV.
The raw data in a coincidence measurement contain both true and accidental counts48,49,50. One true count consists of one photoelectron and one Auger electron, connected to a single photoionization event. The accidental counts correspond to electrons from different photoionization processes and thus from two different atoms, which accidentally arrive in the same time window on the two detectors.The ratio between true and accidental coincidences sets a limit on what intensities are practical to use. Since the number of the true countrate is proportional to the incoming light intensity I and the accidental countrate is proportional to \(I^2\), it is usually desirable to measure at low intensities despite the increased measurement time. Anyway, since only true counts reflect the real behaviour of the system the raw data has to be corrected. For the correction we used data from two consecutive synchrotron pulses as a measure for the accidental intensity. This allows to generate a dataset containing only accidentals measured under identical conditions. Subtracting the accidental counts from the raw data counts leads to the true coincidence dataset. For a detailed explanation of the APECS technique and the setup used for the presented experiment see Leitner et al.41. In the presented experiment the raw map contains 71,075 counts, the accidental map 53,187 counts and the true map 17,889 counts. The data acquisition time amounts to 28 h. Note, that the single, non-coincident Auger electron or photoelectron spectra can be extracted from the same dataset.
Due to the simultaneous measurement additional information can be gained from the dataset, besides the non-coincident Auger and photoelectron spectrum. By selecting only specific regions in the Auger spectrum one can select particular Auger final states and observe exclusively the corresponding initial core-hole states in the corresponding photoelectron spectrum. The other way around, selecting specific photoelectrons regions means that only particular initial states contribute to the resulting Auger spectrum. This is particularly useful to gain information about specific core-hole relaxation pathways31, but also for chemical analysis especially in the case of overlapping features.
The main chamber was operated under UHV conditions (\(10^{-10}\,{\text {mbar}}\)). The Ni(111) single crystal was cleaned in the preparation chamber (\(10^{-10}\,{\text {mbar}}\)) by heat treatment at 520 K for \(24\,{\text {h}}\), in order to degas the sample and subsequently treated by several sputtering (Ar+ \(5\cdot 10^{-6}\,{\text {mbar}}\), \(20\, {\text {min}}\)) and annealing (1070 K, \(5\,{\text {min}}\)) cycles. The purity was ensured by overview PES measurements, which showed only small traces of O and C. Afterward, the sample was exposed to air at \(10^{-7}\) mbar and cooled down during the exposure using liquid Helium below 80 K. The process yields a large O 1s, O 2s and O Auger peak. Additionally, traces of C and N are present on the surface.
Results
Figure 2a shows an overview PES spectrum at 700 eV X-ray excitation energy. The features were assigned according to available XPS data11,47,51,52 The cyan spectrum shows Ni(111) after several cleaning cycles. Besides the expected Ni 3p, 3s and the valence band small residues mainly originating from O and C are present. The orange spectrum in Fig. 2a shows the Ni(111) sample after exposure to air. The C contamination slightly increased, and additionally a small amount of N on the surface appeared. The main change however is due to O at around 162 eV (O 1s), 666 eV (O 2s) and a large contribution from the O Auger decay (450–520 eV). A similar behaviour is observed for several preparation cycles, although the amount of N and C showed slight variations. Even though air has a large N amount the adsorption of \(\hbox {N}_2\) on a Nickel surface is less likely then for O or \(\hbox {O}_2\). This is, due to a very strong bonding between the N atoms.
Comparison of the O Auger region with tabulated Auger energies by W. E. Moddeman et al.51 indicates no ice formation is taking place on the surface, since \(\hbox {H}_2\)O should have a substantially narrower Auger spectrum and does not exhibit features above 500 eV. Even though, we cannot completely exclude the presence of \(\hbox {H}_2\)O the results indicate that the main contribution originates from molecular and atomic oxygen.
The APECS study was performed at cryogenic temperature. In this experiment we measure the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons and that of the Auger electrons in coincidence. However, it is more convenient to show the photoelectrons on the binding energy scale. For an oxidized Ni surface the 3p levels are shifted towards higher binding energies compared to clean Ni, while the Auger electrons are shifted towards higher kinetic energy (see Fig. 1). Hence, by selecting Auger electrons with higher kinetic energy in the dataset means that we are more sensitive to the 3p photoelectrons corresponding to oxidised Ni atoms, which are located on the surface. Figure 2b shows the Ni MVV Auger 3p photoelectron true coincidence map together with the spectra obtained by integration of the full map along the Auger kinetic energy (c) and along the photoelectron binding energy (d).
At first glance the full, coincident Ni MVV Auger spectrum (Fig. 2c) shows no characteristic features. This is due to the small energy window recorded, which only contains a part of the full 15 eV broad MVV Auger spectrum17. Also the Ni full, coincident 3p photoelectron spectrum (Fig. 2d) shows no distinct features, which is in agreement with already published measurements10,11. For comparison, a non-coincidence ESCA 3p spectrum measured under identical conditions is included as a gray, solid line. The non-coincident data were obtained from the same dataset as the coincidence data by analysing all counts in one spectrometer, disregarding the coincidence condition. The map (Fig. 2b) on the other hand shows two interesting features. One is the drop of intensity at about 57 eV kinetic energy and 67 eV binding energy (blue frame). The other feature is the photoelectron intensity shift towards higher binding energy at Auger energies above 57.5 eV (red frame). In order to analyze these features closely we selected two regions in the map. The integration along the Auger electron axis of the framed regions is shown in Fig. 3a,b using the same color code. Note, that a Shirley background has been subtracted from the shown data14,55. The 3p spectrum obtained in coincidence with the blue Auger region (Fig. 3a), shows two spin–orbit split peaks, i.e. the \(3p_{3/2}\) and the \(3p_{1/2}\) split by about 1.6 eV. This is in agreement with published results10,47, which report values of 1.7 eV or 1.8 eV, respectively. Before we discuss the fit model shown in the Fig. 3, we first have to consider the 3p spectrum obtained in coincidence with the red Auger region Fig. 2b. In the integrated spectrum shown in Fig. 3b we see a main peak at around 66.5 eV binding energy with a shoulder towards higher binding energy. Comparison of the spectra in Fig. 3a,b shows a chemical shift of the main peaks (\(3p_{3/2}\)) of about 0.6 eV related to the surface oxidation. In order to quantify the spectral components, we introduce a fit model consisting of four asymmetrical Voigt (skewed Gaussian convoluted with a Lorentzian profile) peaks with position, amplitude, skewness and width being free fit parameters. The width was set to be the same for all four peaks. With the previously gained knowledge we also fixed the spin–orbit splitting at 1.6 eV for both species. Thus, the model accounts for the Ni bulk and the surface oxidised species, as well as for the spin–orbit splitting. The spin–orbit split photoelectron peaks in dark gray originate from bulk Ni. The spin–orbit split photoelectron peaks in light gray originate from the oxidized Ni surface.
The final fits are in good agreement with the experimental data and are shown as a solid colored line in Fig. 3a,b. The resulting width of the individual peaks is 1.2 eV (FWHM), whereas the Gaussian width is set to 0.3 eV reflecting the experimental resolution. The Lorentzian width results in 1.1 eV and fits very closely to the published results by Nyholm et. al.8, who derived the Lorentzian width of the Ni 3p peaks (1.19 eV) using a broadened 2p spectrum.
The intensity of the individual peaks is rather counterintuitive e.g. the \(3p_{1/2}\) peak is sometimes more intense than the \(3p_{3/2}\) peak, which ratio should be 1/2 in a non-coincident photoelectron spectrum. In a photoelectron Auger electron coincidence experiment however, specific final states are selected when cutting the Auger region in Fig. 2b. These final states correspond to the decay of different core-holes (\(p_{1/2}\) and \(p_{3/2}\)) and to the different chemical states of pure bulk Ni and the NiO surface. Thus, the selected regions include differently weighted contributions by the different final states (some final states are excluded completely), which causes the observed intensity redistributions in the corresponding photoelectron spectra. The possibility to obtain spectra with different relative intensities of the individual photoelectron peaks is a powerful tool when determining the positions of these strongly overlapping peaks. Selecting more Auger transitions, which correspond to the decay of \(p_{1/2}\) core-hole ionised states lead to an enhanced \(p_{1/2}\) intensity in the corresponding photoelectron spectra. In this experiment we have no means to identify the exact final states, due to the broad and overlapping multiplet structure in the Auger spectrum. However, only the peak positions are within the aim of the study and not the intensity ratios.
To evaluate our approach we compared the results with the non-coincidence Ni 3p ESCA spectrum. Figure 3c shows the non-coincidence 3p ESCA spectrum in gray. In blue and red, the fits of the bulk Ni and oxidized Ni surface are shown, respectively. By only adjusting the heights of these two contributions we could achieve good agreement with the experimental non-coincidence Ni 3p ESCA spectrum. The sum of the adjusted partial spectra is shown as a solid black line. Note, that the non-coincident spectrum is broader than the partial coincident spectra due to the life-time broadening but also due to inelastic background, which is reduced in the coincident experiment. Here the model serves only for demonstration purposes, but in principle it has to be corrected for some missing intensities.
Discussion
We demonstrated the capabilities of APECS for the Ni 3p photoelectron spectrum. The Ni 3p ESCA spectrum is broad and featureless, which substantially complicates quantitative studies. Particularly, if the atomic environment causes energetic shifts leading to additional contributions in the spectrum, conventional methods reach their limits. As shown, the MVV Auger spectrum is broad and does not exhibit distinct features. Thus, it is very difficult to identify regions corresponding to specific final states. Nevertheless, by utilizing APECS we are able to narrow the photoelectron lines and deduce their widths and positions from the experimental data. This is due to a great advantage of the coincidence technique to be able to select specific decay channels40,56. In our case, this can be achieved by simply analysing selected regions in the 2D data map.
In an ideal APECS experiment the linewidth of the intermediate core-hole state should be completely removed from the spectra. Due to the width and the overlapping final state multiplet lines in the Auger spectrum, it is impossible to select specific final states. Thus, the width of the photoelectron peaks is strongly influenced by the selected Auger regions, since different final state multiplets or tails of some multiplet lines outside of the selected regions contribute to the width of the photoelectron lines. Therefore, our results do not reflect the real lifetime of the 3p core-holes. But, due to the narrowing effect of the method, we to our knowledge for the first time are able to observe different contributions to the 3p photoelectron spectrum and also deduce the peak positions and the chemical shifts. The analysis of the selected regions narrows the Ni 3p widths to 1.2 eV and gives access to the identification of two different 3p species separated by a chemical shift of 0.6 eV. The obtained results are robust against parameter or shape variations and the errors are within \(\pm 0.1\) eV.
We performed a PES survey, which indicates that the main contribution to the chemical shift is due to the native oxide layer on the Ni surface. The results are in agreement with McIntyre et al.11, who reported a Ni \(3p_{3/2}\) chemical shift in NiO to be about 1 eV towards higher binding energies. This also fits together with the observation of the shift in coincidence with the higher kinetic energy Auger region (see Fig. 1), although we have no means to quantify the Auger spectrum. Finally, we confirm our observations and model by fitting the singles 3p ESCA spectrum using the line shapes obtained from the analysis of the APECS data. Comparison of the intensities of the two contributions shows that the oxidized Ni contributes more to the 3p spectrum than the pure Ni, demonstrating the surface sensitivity of the experiment. Calculating the effective inelastic mean free path for this particular coincidence experiment14 yields about 0.3 nm, which is close to the lattice parameter of Ni57. This indicates that in this experiment we are sensitive to the first two atom layers namely the contaminated surface layer and the pure Ni bulk component.
Conclusions
In conclusion we show how Auger electron photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS) allows for separation of chemically shifted species inseparable in classical ESCA.
APECS at the Ni M-edges of a Ni(111) single crystal exposed to residual gas made it possible to extract the chemical shifts in the photoelectron spectrum by measuring in coincidence with different regions of the Auger spectrum. In this way we could identify and quantify different species corresponding to the oxidized Ni surface layer on a bulk Ni(111) crystal. In this study we also made use of the enhanced surface sensitivity of APECS. With a simple model we have reconstructed the conventional Ni 3p ESCA by using the APECS data confirming that all essential chemical states are captured in our analysis but going far beyond the limitations of conventional PES.
References
Siegbahn, K. M. Electron spectroscopy for atoms, molecules and condensed matter. Rev. Modern Phys. 54, 709 (1981).
Mårtensson, N., Nyholm, R. & Johansson, B. Four-hole satellites in the \(L_3VV\) Auger and the valence-band spectra from nickel. Phys. Rev. B 30, 2245–2248 (1984).
Magnuson, M. et al. Resonant Auger spectroscopy at the \(L_{2,3}\) shake-up thresholds as a probe of electron correlation effects in nickel. Phys. Rev. B 58, 3677 (1998).
Bosh, A., Freil, H., Sawatzky, G. A. & Mårtensson, N. Core hole satellites in Ni and AuNi. Solid State Commun. 41, 355–357 (1982).
Lund, C. P., Thurgate, S. M. & Wedding, A. Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy studies: Trends in the \(L_{2,3}\)–\(M_{4,5}M_{4,5}\) line shapes across the \(3d\) transition-metal series. Phys. Rev. B 55, 5455–5465 (1997).
Mehta, M. & Fadley, C. S. Surfaced-band narrowing in copper from angle-resolved X-ray photoelectron spectra. Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1569–1572 (1977).
Fuggle, J. C., Bennett, P., Hillebrecht, F., Lenselink, A. & Sawatzky, G. A. Influence of multiplet splittings in high-polarity states on magnetism in transition metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1787–1790 (1982).
Nyholm, R., Mårtensson, N., Lebugle, A. & Axelsson, U. Auger and Coster–Kronig broadening effects in the 2p and 3p photoelectron spectra from the metals 22Ti–30Z. J. Phys. F Met. Phys. 11, 1727 (1981).
Yin, L. I., Adler, I., Chen, M. H. & Crasemann, B. Width of atomic \(L_2\), and \(L_3\), vacancy states near \(Z =30\). Phys. Rev. A 7, 897–903 (1973).
Hüfner, S. & Wertheim, G. K. Influence of multiplet splittings in high-polarity states on magnetism in transition metals. Phys. Lett. 51A, 301–303 (1975).
Mcintyre, N. S. & Cook, M. G. X-ray photoelectron studies on some oxides and hydroxides of cobalt, nickel and copper. Anal. Chem. 47, 2208–2213 (1975).
Thurgate, S. M., Lund, C. P. & Wedding, A. Applications of Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS) to understanding inner-shell transitions. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 87, 259–266 (1994).
Thurgate, S. M. & Lund, C. P. Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS) a tool for understanding auger emission from solids. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 72, 289–297 (1995).
Lund, C. P., Thurgate, S. M. & Wedding, A. Intrinsic satellites in the \(L_{2,3}VV\) Auger spectra of \(3d\) transition metals. Phys. Rev. B 49, 352–357 (1994).
Sarma, D. D., Carbone, C., Sen, P. & Gudat, W. Synchrotron-radiation study of the satellites in Ni L3–M4,5M4,5 Auger spectra. Phys. Rev. B 40, 12542–12545 (1989).
Whitfield, S. B., Armen, G. B., Carr, R., Levin, J. C. & Crasemann, B. Vacancy multiplication following Ni \(L\)-shell photoionization. Phys. Rev. A 37, 419–425 (1988).
Songsiriritthigul, P. et al. MVV super Coster–Kronig spectra of nickel near the excitation threshold. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, 7029–7052 (2005).
Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press. Adobe Photoshop (2017). https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop.html.
Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press. Adobe Illustrator (2019). https://www.adobe.com/products/illustrator.html.
Stichting Blender Foundation, Amsterdam. Community BO. Blender—A 3D modelling and rendering package. http://www.blender.org.
Greeley, J. & Mavrikakis, M. A first-principles study of surface and subsurface H on and in Ni(111): Diffusional properties and coverage-dependent behavior. Surf. Sci. 540, 215–229 (2003).
Wilde, L., Pangher, N. & Haase, J. Structure determination of Ni(110)-(2 × 3)-N by use of SEXAFS measurements: On-surface and sub-surface sites on a pseudo-(100) reconstructed surface. Surf. Sci. 316, L1093–L1098 (1984).
Nozoye, H. Selective adsorption of nitrogen along a step line of Ni(755). Surf. Sci. 169, L362–L366 (1986).
Steinbach, F., Kiss, J. & Krall, R. Identification and stability of \({\text{ CH}}_3\), \({\text{ CH}}_2\), and CH species on Co and Ni surfaces, a PES investigation. Surf. Sci. 157, 401–412 (1985).
Terakura, K., Williams, A. R., Oguchi, T. & Kübler, J. Transition–metal monoxides: Band or Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1830–1833 (1984).
Sawatzky, G. A. & Allen, J. W. Magnitude and origin of the band gap in NiO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2339–2342 (1984).
Eastman, D. E. & Freeouf, J. L. Photoemission partial state densities of overlapping p and d states for NiO, CoO, FeO, MnO, and Cr2O3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 395–398 (1975).
Krishnan, N. G., Delgass, W. N. & Robertson, W. D. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of oxygen adsorption on clean Ni (100) surfaces. Surf. Sci. 57, 1–11 (1976).
Hooker, M. P., Grant, J. T. & Haas, T. W. Some aspects of an AES and XPS study of the adsorption of O2 on Ni. J. Vacuum Sci. Technol. 13, 296–300 (1976).
Venezia, A. M. & Loxton, C. M. Low pressure oxidation of \({\text{ Ni}}_3\)Al alloys at elevated temperatures as studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Auger spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 194, 136–148 (1988).
Born, A. et al. Quantification of Ni \(L_{2,3}\) core-hole relaxation pathways utilizing Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 103, 115121 (2021).
Jensen, E., Bartynski, R. A., Hulbert, S. L. & Johnson, E. D. Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy using synchrotron radiation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 3013 (1992).
Bartynski, R., Jensen, E. & Hulbert, S. Novel electronic properties of solids revealed by Auger-photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS). Phys. Scr. 1992, 168 (1992).
Schumann, F. O., Dhaka, R. S., van Riessen, G. A., Wei, Z. & Kirschner, J. Surface state and resonance effects in electron-pair emission from Cu(111). Phys. Rev. B 84, 125106 (2011).
van Riessen, G. A. et al. Direct and core-resonant double photoemission from Cu(001). J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 092201 (2010).
Wei, Z., Schumann, F. O., Dhaka, R. S. & Kirschner, J. Electron pair emission from surfaces: Diffraction effects. Phys. Rev. B 85, 195120 (2012).
Kakiuchi, T. et al. Development of an electron electron ion coincidence analyzer for Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy (APECS) and electron ion coincidence (EICO) spectroscopy. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 161, 164–171 (2007).
Kakiuchi, T. et al. Surface-site-selective study of valence electronic states of a clean Si (111)-\(7\times 7\) surface using Si \(L_{23}VV\) Auger electron and Si 2p photoelectron coincidence measurements. Phys. Rev. B 83, 035320 (2011).
Kakiuchi, T., Fujita, N., Mase, K. & Tanaka, M. Study of local valence electronic states of \({\text{ SiO}}_2\) ultrathin films grown on Si (111) by Using Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy: Upward shift of valence-band maximum depending on the interface structure. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 074706 (2012).
Ohno, M. What can we learn by Auger-photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy?. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 104, 109–118 (1999).
Leitner, T. et al. The CoESCA station at BESSY: Auger electron-photoelectron coincidences from surfaces demonstrated for Ag MNN. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 250, 147075 (2021).
Holldack, K. et al. Single bunch X-ray pulses on demand from a multi-bunch synchrotron radiation source. Nat. Commun. 5, 4010 (2014).
Ovsyannikov, R. et al. Principles and operation of a new type of electron spectrometer–ArTOF. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 191, 92–103 (2013).
Kühn, D. et al. Capabilities of angle resolved time of flight electron spectroscopy with the \(60^{\circ } \) wide angle acceptance lens. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 224, 45–50 (2018).
Kirchmann, P. S. et al. A time-of-flight spectrometer for angle-resolved detection of low energy electrons in two dimensions. Appl. Phys. A 91, 211–217 (2008).
Oelsner, A. et al. Time- and energy resolved photoemission electron microscopy-imaging of photoelectron time-of-flight analysis by means of pulsed excitations. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 178–179, 317–330 (2010).
Thompson, A. et al. X-Ray Data Booklet (Lawerence Berkley National Laboratory, University of California, 2009).
Jensen, E., Bartynski, R. A., Hulbert, S. L. & Johnson, E. D. Auger photoelectron coincidence spectroscopy using synchrotron radiation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63, 3013–3026 (1992).
Lower, J. & Weigold, E. Improved techniques in multiparameter coincidence experiments. J. Phys. E Sci. Instrum. 22, 421–427 (1989).
Thurgate, S., Todd, B., Lohmann, B. & Stelbovics, A. An Auger photoelectron coincidence spectrometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 3733–3737 (1990).
Moddeman, W. E. et al. Determination of the \(K-LL\) Auger spectra of \(N_2\), \(O_2\), \(CO\), \(NO\), \(H_2O\), and \(CO_2\). J. Chem. Phys. 55, 2317–2336 (1971).
Mansour, A. N. Characterization of NiO by XPS. Surf. Sci. Spectra 3, 231–238 (1998).
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2d graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).
Inkscape Project. Inkscape (2020). https://inkscape.org.
Herrera-Gomez, A., Bravo-Sanchez, M., Ceballos-Sanchez, O. & Vazquez-Lepe, M. Practical methods for background subtraction in photoemission spectra. Surf. Interface Anal. 46, 897–905 (2014).
Sawatzky, G. A. Treatise on Materials Science and Technology Vol. 30 (Academic Press, Inc., 1988).
Decker, R. et al. Measuring the atomic spin-flip scattering rate by X-ray emission spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 9, 8977 (2019).
Acknowledgements
Technical support by HZB staff at BESSY II during experiment at the CoESCA endstation (UE52_PGM) as well as the auxiliary Nickel crystal preparation at SurfaceDynamics (UE56-1_PGM) is gratefully acknowledged. N.M. acknowledged funding from Carl Tryggers Foundation for scientific research. A.L. acknowledges support from the Swedish Research Council grant No. 2018-05336. A.F. acknowledges the FLAG-ERA Graphene Basic Research 2 2017 in project LaMeS DFG project number 400335214 and ERC-Advanced Investigator Grand No. 669531 EDAX.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.B. and A.F. designed and coordinated the project. A.B.,and T.L. performed the measurements. A.B. analyzed the data. A.B., F.O.J., D.K., N.M. and A.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Born, A., Johansson, F.O.L., Leitner, T. et al. Separation of surface oxide from bulk Ni by selective Ni 3p photoelectron spectroscopy for chemical analysis in coincidence with Ni M-edge Auger electrons. Sci Rep 11, 16596 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96108-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96108-x
- Springer Nature Limited