Abstract
China is a populous country but lacks epidemiological data on keratoconus (KC). The present study aimed to investigate the clinical data, demographic data, and visual function (VF) data of KC patients in Central China. A total of 524 KC eyes in 307 KC patients (217 bilateral and 90 unilateral) from Henan Eye Hospital were included in the current study. Demographic and VF data were assessed with questionnaires administered by well-trained staff during face-to-face interviews. Visual acuity value was examined by a qualified optometrist, and the clinical data were measured by professional clinicians. The distributions of sex, residence and education level of KC patients were compared by Chi-square tests, and the ratios of people wearing glasses and rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses were compared by McNemar tests. General linear models/Chi-squared tests were used to compare the clinical and demographic data according to KC severity. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to test the associations between the data and KC severity. The mean age at diagnosis was 20.98 ± 6.06 years, and males had a higher ratio of KC than females (P < 0.001). Patients in rural areas had a higher rate of KC than those in urban areas (P = 0.039), and the proportion of KC patients with a higher education level (above high school) was high (P < 0.001). A total of 68.40% of the patients reported eye rubbing and 3.52% had a positive family history. The percentage of people wearing glasses was higher than that of patients wearing RGP lenses (P < 0.001). The total VF score of KC patients was 69.35 ± 15.25. The thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) and stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1) values were inversely correlated with KC severity (P < 0.05). The mean, steep, and max keratometry (Km, Ks and Kmax) values, the RGP lens use and keratoplasty were positively correlated with KC severity (all P < 0.05). The total VF score of the eye with better VA decreased as the severity increased (r = − 0.21, P = 0.002). The present study comprehensively describes various associated features of KC patients from a tertiary hospital in Central China, providing a reference for understanding the characteristics of KC patients in China.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Keratoconus (KC) is a corneal disorder characterized by corneal thinning, vision deterioration and irregular astigmatism that usually starts in the early teens1. The prevalence of KC was reported to be 1.38 per 1000 in a recent review2. KC etiology is currently unclear now, and the genetic and environmental factors have been reported to play important roles3,4,5,6. Epidemiological investigation of KC is helpful to further understand this condition.
The clinical findings of KC are mostly obtained through slit-lamp biomicroscopy, corneal topography, corneal tomography and corneal biomechanical examinations7. A previous study demonstrated that clinical measurements could provide references for evaluating the progression and disease severity of KC as well as treatment effects8. In addition, patients with KC experience ocular discomfort and poor visual acuity (VA), leading to impaired ability to perform social duties9. Mahdaviazad et al.10 found that the physical, emotional, and social functions were impaired in 30 Iranian KC patients. Yildiz et al.11 indicated that visual function (VF) in 149 Pennsylvania KC patients remained impaired after penetrating keratoplasty. In addition, Saunier et al.12 reported that KC patients subjectively perceive a loss of VF disproportionate to that reflected by clinical measurements. Thus, evaluating the clinical measurements and VF assists in comprehensive assessments of KC patients13.
KC patient characteristics have been investigated in previous studies worldwide; however, the results are controversial5,14,15. Khor et al.5 reported that KC patients in Asia had similar demographic and clinical characteristics to patients in Western populations. Despite being a populous country, China is a developing country, and research on Chinese KC patient characteristics is still limited. Xu et al.16 reported that the prevalence of steep cornea/KC was 0.9 ± 0.2% in people aged > 50 years who lived in Beijing, northern China, and the prevalence was associated with ocular parameters. However, the disease was defined based on only corneal refractive power, and the corneal topography that could detect minor forms of KC was not included in the study design. Jian et al.17 evaluated the ocular dimensions of KC eyes from Shanghai, eastern China, and found that KC eyes were characterized by deeper anterior chamber depths but shorter optical axial lengths and posterior segment lengths in adolescents (11–18 years). The demographic data, VF questionnaire data and corneal biomechanics of KC patients were not evaluated. In addition, Ma et al.18 found that corneal thickness in healthy eyes was significantly inconsistent among different regions, indicating that corneal parameters might not be consistent in different regions of China. Henan Province is located in Central China and is the third most populous province in China, with 96.4 million permanent residents in 2019. The province is dominated by agriculture, and the economic and medical conditions are different from those of other regions. There is a paucity of epidemiological research combining clinical and demographic data of KC patients in Central China. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate 307 KC patients’ characteristics from a hospital-based population, combining clinical data, demographic data and VF questionnaire responses.
Methods
Study subjects
KC patients were consecutively enrolled in this descriptive study from June 2018 to January 2020 at Henan Eye Hospital & Henan Eye Institute. The hospital is one of the earliest ophthalmic research institutes and contains refractive surgery centers, optometry centers, and corneal and ocular surface disease centers. It is equipped with professional instruments and can facilitate customized treatment for KC patients at different stages.
The inclusion criteria of clinical KC were as follows7,19: asymmetric bowtie pattern with or without skewed axes revealed by corneal topography and at least one KC clinical sign detected by slit-lamp examination (localized stromal thinning, Vogt’s striae, Fleischer’s ring, conical protrusion, or anterior stromal scar). Unilateral KC was considered if a patient had KC in one eye but did not meet the diagnostic criteria in the contralateral eye.
Clinical data
Objective refraction including autorefraction (Topcon KR-800) and retinoscopy examination (scissor reflex sign), and subjective refraction, including phoropter (Topcon CV-5000) and trial lenses, were conducted in the subjects in the current study. A standard logarithmic visual acuity chart with a lightbox was used to obtain VA values. Clinical signs for KC were recorded. The best corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) unit and used for further analysis.
Corneal topography and tomography were obtained through a Pentacam HR Imaging System (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany), which uses the Scheimpflug imaging technique to present indices with acceptable accuracy and repeatability20. The following parameters were evaluated in the current study: the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT); mean, steep and the max keratometry (Km, Ks, Kmax); inferior superior (I-S) value; and Belin Ambrósio display (BAD). The corneal biomechanical parameters were measured through corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST, Oculus 72100, Wetzlar, Germany). The acceptable repeatability of Corvis ST parameters has been described elsewhere in the published literature21. The following parameters were recorded in the current analysis: intraocular pressure (IOP), biomechanical corrected IOP (bIOP), stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1) and Corvis biomechanical index (CBI).
The slit-lamp examination, Pentacam and Corvis ST measurements were conducted by professional clinicians between 9:00 and 17:00. If the patients wore RGP lenses at their first visit, they were asked to stop wearing RGP lenses for two weeks and reexamined.
Questionnaire survey
The demographic questionnaire and VF questionnaire survey were conducted by well-trained staff during face-to-face interviews at the clinic.
The questionnaire and survey were conducted when the patients first visited the hospital during the study period. For patients who had been diagnosed with KC before the study began, a check-up was performed via phone call, and the questionnaire was performed at their follow-up visit at our clinic. Age (enrollment age, KC onset age, and myopia onset age), education level (< high school, high school, > high school), residence (urban/rural), eye rubbing history, allergic disease history, onset condition, and type of vision correction before diagnosis were collected from the demographic questionnaire. A positive family history was defined as at least one first-degree relative diagnosed with KC. First-degree relatives (parents, siblings and offspring) of 142 KC patients had undergone examinations (slit-lamp examination, vision examination, Pentacam HR and Corvis ST measurements) to evaluate the positive family history. The allergic disease history of KC patients was defined as a previous diagnosis of allergic disease by a clinician. Wearing glasses, wearing rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses, cross-linking (CXL) surgery and keratoplasty are the main management strategies for current KC patients.
The VFQ-25 consists of a base set of 25 vision-targeted questions representing 12 subscales: general health (1); general vision (1); mental health symptoms due to vision (4); ocular pain (2); difficulty with near-vision activities (3); difficulty with distance-vision activities (3); limitations in peripheral vision (1); limitations in social functioning due to vision (2); driving difficulties (3); color vision (1); role limitations due to vision (2); and dependency on others due to vision (3). It has been widely used to assess ocular conditions, such as cataracts, KC, glaucoma, macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and CMV retinitis22,23,24. The methodology and validity of the VFQ-25 has been described previously9,25. In the present study, the VFQ-25 questionnaire was used to evaluate KC patients’ difficulty performing vision-related daily activities with their existing optical correction. The subscale scores, ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), were calculated based on the scoring algorithm.
Statistical analysis
Means ± standard deviations (SD) were calculated to describe qualitative data, and proportions were calculated to describe quantitative data. The Amsler–Krumeich (AK) classification was used to evaluate severity in all KC eyes7. The distributions of sex, residence and education level in KC patients were compared to those in the general population of Henan Province in 2019 using Chi-square tests (http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2020/indexch.htm), and the ratios of people who wore glasses and RGP lenses were compared by McNemar tests. A general linear model or Chi-squared test was used to compare the demographic values, VF scores, clinical measurements, and treatments according to the disease severity. Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between parameters and KC severity. A P value of < 0.05 (two-tailed) was considered statistically significant.
Ethics approval and informed consent
This study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki guidelines and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Henan Eye Hospital [ethical approval number: HNEECKY-2019 (5)]. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient or the legal guardian of subjects under the age of 18.
Results
Clinical measurements
A total of 402 KC patients visited the hospital during the study period. Among them, 28 subjects who had incomplete measurements, 64 participants who had incomplete demographic questionnaires, and 3 participants who developed keratectasia after refractive surgery were excluded. Finally, a total of 307 KC patients (217 bilateral and 90 unilateral) were included in the current analysis. Eyes with acute corneal hydrops (N = 21), corneal keratoplasty (N = 25) and scars (N = 48) affecting clinical data were excluded. Thus, a total of 430 KC eyes with qualified measurements were included to analyze corneal topography, tomography and biomechanical parameters (Fig. 1).
The mean CDVA was 0.52 ± 0.27. The scissor reflex was present in 94.04%, Vogt striae was present in 29.29%, Fleischer ring was present in 70.92%, Munson sign was present in 47.49% and corneal scarring was present in 12.76% of patients. Table 1 presents the Pentacam HR and Corvis ST measurements of the KC eyes. The mean TCT was 455.25 ± 48.67 μm, and the Km was 49.70 ± 5.98 D. The SP-A1 value for all KC patients was 69.40 ± 23.23 mmHg/mm.
Demographic characteristics
Table 2 presents the demographic parameters of KC patients. The mean enrollment and diagnosis ages were 22.68 ± 6.50 and 20.98 ± 6.06 years, respectively. Males had a higher ratio of KC than females (P < 0.001), and patients living in rural areas had a higher rate than those living in urban areas (P = 0.039). The proportion of KC patients with a higher education (above high school) level was high (P < 0.001, Supplementary Table 1). In addition, 68.40% of the patients reported eye rubbing, 3.52% had a positive family history, and 12.70% had an allergic disease history. A total of 125 patients were diagnosed when preparing for/replacing the glasses at optometry clinics. Ninety-two (29.97%) patients had not received any eye care before diagnosis.
Scores of the VFQ-25
In total, 297 of the 307 KC patients who were included the VF score evaluation had complete VF information. The total VF score in KC patients was 69.35 ± 15.25. The scores of the 12 subscales are presented in Fig. 2. The scores of the 12 subscales ranged from 46.47 ± 24.58 (general health) to 90.59 ± 17.20 (color vision).
Existing management strategies
Figure 3 shows the existing management strategies for 524 KC eyes. A total of 363 KC eyes were corrected with glasses, 259 KC eyes were corrected with RGP lenses, 238 KC eyes had been treated with CXL surgery, 25 KC eyes had undergone keratoplasty, and 48 KC eyes had not received treatment (9.16%). More people wore glasses than RGP lenses (glasses vs RGP lenses: 69.71% vs 49.19%, P < 0.001).
Correlation between parameters and disease severity
Table 3 presents the clinical and demographic data according to AK classification. The percentages of AK1, AK2, AK3, and AK4 eyes were 23.66%, 26.15%, 20.80% and 29.39%, respectively. The results showed that TCT and SP-A1 values were negatively associated with KC severity, and the Km, Ks and Kmax values; the percent of RGP lenses; and keratoplasty were positively associated with KC severity (all P < 0.05). The eyes with better VA in 217 bilateral KC patients were included in the correlation analysis between total VF score and disease severity. The total VF of the eye with better VA decreased as the severity increased (r = − 0.21, P = 0.002, Fig. 4).
Discussion
KC is a progressive disease that leads to the development of corneal steepening, thinning, and asymmetric distortion in the apical zone of the cornea1. In this hospital-based study, we comprehensively evaluated various features, including clinical data, demographic factors, and VF questionnaire data of 307 KC patients in Central China.
KC is a corneal protrusion disorder, and Pentacam HR parameters have been demonstrated effective in diagnosing KC and evaluating its progression8,26. The TCT values in the present study were higher, and the Km values were lower than those reported by Naderan et al.27. Abnormal biomechanical parameters are observed at an early stage before tomographic changes and clinical symptoms in KC28. Our previous study showed that eyes with KC had lower values of SP-A1 than normal eyes, and the value of SP-A1 was consistent with the current results21. In addition, the current study showed that the Km value increased and SP-A1 value decreased as disease severity decreased, indicating that the cornea became steeper and corneal stiffness became weaker as disease severity decreased29. Slit-lamp examination is necessary for evaluating eyes with KC. The percentages of Vogt striae, Fleischer ring, and corneal scarring in the present study were consistent with those reported by Khor et al.5, but lower than those reported in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of KC (CLEK) study14.
KC presents at puberty and progresses until the third or fourth decade of life8. The mean age at diagnosis was 20.98 years in our study, which was lower than that reported in previous studies30,31,32. The mean age of KC patients from the CLEK was 39.29 ± 10.90 years30. Tufts et al.31 reported that the age at KC diagnosis was 22.4 years in males and 23.3 years in females. Hwang et al.32 further reported that the median age at diagnosis was 29 years in 13,343 KC patients in South Korea. The ratio of KC patients aged < 20 years was lower in our study than in the study by Abu Ameerh et al.33. In addition, KC was diagnosed in a higher proportion of males than females, which was consistent with previous findings5,15. The proportion of KC patients with a higher education level was high, which is similar to the results reported in a study conducted in Denmark15. Differences in demographic data may be attributed to the anatomic, physiologic, hormonal, genetic and lifestyle habits as well as personality factor differences34.
A recent study reported that eye rubbing, disease history, and family history of KC are critical factors associated with the incidence of KC2. Eye rubbing, a common physiological response to a sensation of eye discomfort, can be induced by fatigue, dust or allergen exposure, and contact lenses35. The present study showed that 68.40% of KC patients had an eye rubbing history, and this proportion was within the range of 44.8–83% reported in a previous study36. The association between eye rubbing and KC may be related to keratocyte density and IOP36. However, the correlation between IOP and eye rubbing was not statistically significant in the current study (r = − 0.075, P = 0.091). Furthermore, no significant difference was found between eye rubbing and KC severity. Further studies with a control group to explore the association between eye rubbing and KC incidence are needed. Allergic conditions, as one of the primary triggers that stimulate eye rubbing, were also found to be associated with KC37. Approximately 25% of KC patients in India had systemic or ocular allergies38, and 34.4% of KC patients in Israel were reported to have allergies39, and 17.6% of KC patients had environmental allergies in a study by Nemet et al.40. The proportion of allergic diseases in the current study was lower than that in other studies, which may be explained by the differences in physiologic, hormonal, and genetic factors as well as lifestyle habits38,39,40.
A positive family history of KC is a strong indication of a genetic predisposition, and the ratio of patients with a family history of KC was inconsistent with previous literatures4,5,14,41,42,43,44. We found that the ratio of positive first-degree family history was 3.52%, which was lower than the proportions reported by Gordon-Shaag et al. (26%)44, Millodot et al. (21.7%)42, Naderan et al. (19.5%)4, Szczotka-Flynn et al. (17.8%)41, Karimian et al. (14%)43, Zadnik et al. (13.5%)14 and Khor et al. (4.3%)5. Lower response rates in first-degree relatives with KC and different criteria for determining a positive family history have caused the percentage differences between these studies45. Data from a large number of family members’ clinical examinations were being collected in the present study, and further analysis will be conducted in the future.
The present study showed that patients in rural areas had a higher incidence of KC than those from urban areas, and 125 patients of 307 patients were diagnosed with eye abnormalities, including a rapidly increase in spherical equivalent or/and astigmatism value, or/and a decrease in CDVA value, at optometry clinics. Furthermore, the percentage of AK4 eyes among 524 KC eyes was 29.39%, and one-third of 307 KC patients had not received eye care before diagnosis. This phenomenon may be attributed to the medical insurance system in China and the demographic data of participants. The Chinese health system is a basic medical insurance system (BMIS), which is an important part of the medical security system with Chinese characteristics46. The cost of keratoplasty is covered by insurance. However, the costs of KC diagnostic examinations and management strategies (such as glasses, RGP lenses, and CXL surgery) are not covered by the insurance. In addition, regular eye examinations are not yet available to all residents in China, and patients often visit hospitals only if they have symptoms. Most patients might seek the help from optometry clinics, which are not equipped with diagnostic tools, leading to missed diagnosis of mild KC33. Patients usually visit the hospital when they are unable to obtain adequate care at optometry clinics. The rural population in Henan Province is relatively larger, and the per capita disposable income in Henan Province is lower than those in Beijing (northern China) and Shanghai (eastern China)16,17. The percentage of patients with KC in the capital district is much higher because the diagnosis is not covered by health insurance. The results provide a reference for understanding the characteristics of KC patients in China, and a multicenter study combining the data from local hospitals and other regions needs to be conducted in the future.
The unpredictable nature of visual disturbance caused by KC affects the daily activities and emotional well-being of patients47. The findings reported by the CLEK study have shown that the scores of the 12 subscales were higher than those reported in the present study12. The total VF score in current KC patients was lower than those in KC patients from France13, Iran10, and Istanbul48, whereas it was quite similar to those in KC patients from Japan49 and Diyarbakir50. Several studies have indicated that VF is sensitive enough to detect KC at an early stage because of early visual disturbances induced by vision loss and irregular astigmatism25,49. In addition, the current study found that the total VF score in the eye with better VA was negatively associated with the disease severity, which is consistent with previous studies12,51. However, no significant association was found between VF scores and KC grades in a study by Tatematsu-Ogawa et al.49, in which Japanese KC patients had a higher mean age and were divided into three groups according to CDVA value. The differences in associations might be explained by the ethnic differences and the types of KC classification; AK classification was used in the current research. The VFQ-25 measurements, which provide information about KC patients, are beneficial to clinicians, and more studies should be conducted in the future.
The management of KC, as a progressive disease, varies with disease severity. At an early stage, treatment is usually achieved with glasses. As the disease progresses, astigmatism worsens, and glasses cannot correct it; at that point, RGP lenses become the principal therapeutic option52. The present study’s results with regard to the proportion of KC patients with RGP lenses was similar to that reported by Agrawal (40%)38 but were lower than that reported by Owens et al. (83%)53 and Shneor et al. (78.7%)39 and that reported in the CLEK study (75%)14. The difference may be attributed to the various medical systems and the availability, intolerance, and the affordability of RGP lenses38. In addition, the percentage of patients wearing glasses was higher than that of patients wearing RGP lenses, and the number of patients wearing RGP lenses increased as the severity of KC increased. This might be attributed to the high cost of RGP lenses and the relatively low economic status of subjects in Central China, which is different from other regions of China and other countries. Significant challenges in the management of progressive KC are to improve vision and arrest the progression of the disease54. The effectiveness of CXL surgery in arresting disease progression has been reported in several studies55,56. In advanced to severe stages, when glasses or RGP lenses cannot improve vision, keratoplasty is performed39. The present study showed that the percentage of patients who underwent keratoplasty increased with increasing KC severity. However, keratoplasty complications, such as rejection, a fixed dilated pupil, postoperative astigmatism, and recurrence of KC, affect the application of keratoplasty1. The treatments available for KC have been demonstrated effective, and the critical consideration is to select the best treatment for the KC patient.
The current study was based on a hospital-based population. Although the hospital is a tertiary hospital with trained and experienced ophthalmologists, the study does not fully represent the whole population of China. This hospital-based study analyzed the clinical features of the disease and evaluated the effects of therapeutic measures57. However, some bias still exists that may affect the research results. In addition, certain limitations in the current study should be noted. This is a descriptive study that relied on clinical records. Some patients had been diagnosed with KC for over 5 years, and the demographic and onset data that were obtained through the questionnaire may be biased. In addition, the study investigated KC patient characteristics, with no control group, affecting the extrapolation of the results. A multicenter and large sample study on KC is needed, and the relevant results need to be validated further in the general population of China in future studies.
In conclusion, the present study comprehensively described various associated features in 307 KC patients in Central China, combining clinical data, demographic data and VF questionnaire data. The results reported here may help us better understand the characteristics of KC patients in China.
Data availability
All relevant data are included in the papers and its Supporting Information files. Contact to Dr. Shengwei Ren (shengweiren1984@163.com) for additional information regarding data access.
References
Rabinowitz, Y. S. Keratoconus. Surv. Ophthalmol. 42, 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(97)00119-7 (1998).
Hashemi, H. et al. The prevalence and risk factors for keratoconus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cornea 39, 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000002150 (2020).
Gordon-Shaag, A., Millodot, M., Shneor, E. & Liu, Y. The genetic and environmental factors for keratoconus. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 795738. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/795738 (2015).
Naderan, M., Rajabi, M. T., Zarrinbakhsh, P., Naderan, M. & Bakhshi, A. Association between family history and keratoconus severity. Curr. Eye Res. 41, 1414–1418. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713683.2015.1128553 (2016).
Khor, W. B., Wei, R. H., Lim, L., Chan, C. M. & Tan, D. T. Keratoconus in Asians: Demographics, clinical characteristics and visual function in a hospital-based population. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 39, 299–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02458.x (2011).
Hao, X. D., Chen, P., Chen, Z. L., Li, S. X. & Wang, Y. Evaluating the association between keratoconus and reported genetic loci in a Han Chinese population. Ophthalmic Genet. 36, 132–136. https://doi.org/10.3109/13816810.2015.1005317 (2015).
Mas Tur, V., MacGregor, C., Jayaswal, R., O’Brart, D. & Maycock, N. A. Review of keratoconus: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics. Surv. Ophthalmol. 62, 770–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.06.009 (2017).
Gomes, J. A. et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea 34, 359–369. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408 (2015).
Abe, R. Y. et al. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. PLoS ONE 14, e0226086. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226086 (2019).
Mahdaviazad, H., Bamdad, S., Roustaei, N. & Mohaghegh, S. Vision-related quality of life in iranian patients with keratoconus: National Eye Institute Vision Function Questionnaire-25. Eye Contact Lens 44(Suppl 2), S350–S354. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000492 (2018).
Yildiz, E. H. et al. Quality of life in keratoconus patients after penetrating keratoplasty. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 149(416–422), e411-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.10.005 (2010).
Kymes, S. M., Walline, J. J., Zadnik, K., Gordon, M. O. & Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus Study Group. Quality of life in keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 138, 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.04.031 (2004).
Saunier, V. et al. Vision-related quality of life and dependency in French keratoconus patients: Impact study. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 43, 1582–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.024 (2017).
Zadnik, K. et al. Baseline findings in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39, 2537–2546 (1998).
Bak-Nielsen, S., Ramlau-Hansen, C. H., Ivarsen, A., Plana-Ripoll, O. & Hjortdal, J. A nationwide population-based study of social demographic factors, associated diseases and mortality of keratoconus patients in Denmark from 1977 to 2015. Acta Ophthalmol. 97, 497–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13961 (2019).
Xu, L. et al. Prevalence and associations of steep cornea/keratoconus in Greater Beijing. The Beijing Eye Study. PLoS ONE 7, e39313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039313 (2012).
Jian, W., Shen, Y., Chen, Y., Tian, M. & Zhou, X. Ocular dimensions of the Chinese adolescents with keratoconus. BMC Ophthalmol. 18, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0713-6 (2018).
Ma, R. et al. Distribution and trends in corneal thickness parameters in a large population-based multicenter study of young Chinese adults. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 59, 3366–3374. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24332 (2018).
Yang, K. et al. Evaluation of new Corvis ST parameters in normal, Post-LASIK, Post-LASIK keratectasia and keratoconus eyes. Sci. Rep. 10, 5676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62825-y (2020).
Chen, D. & Lam, A. K. Reliability and repeatability of the Pentacam on corneal curvatures. Clin. Exp. Optom. 92, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00336.x (2009).
Yang, K., Xu, L., Fan, Q., Zhao, D. & Ren, S. Repeatability and comparison of new Corvis ST parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes. Sci. Rep. 9, 15379. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51502-4 (2019).
Wan, Y. et al. Correlation among Lens Opacities Classification System III grading, the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire, and Visual Function Index-14 for age-related cataract assessment. Int. Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01353-0 (2020).
Wu, Y. et al. Rigid gas-permeable contact lens related life quality in keratoconic patients with different grades of severity. Clin. Exp. Optom. 98, 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12237 (2015).
Mangione, C. M. et al. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: Results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch. Ophthalmol. 116, 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.2.227 (1998).
Mangione, C. M. et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch. Ophthalmol. 119, 1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050 (2001).
Huseynli, S., Salgado-Borges, J. & Alio, J. L. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 28, 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672118760146 (2018).
Naderan, M., Jahanrad, A. & Farjadnia, M. Clinical biomicroscopy and retinoscopy findings of keratoconus in a Middle Eastern population. Clin. Exp. Optom. 101, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12579 (2018).
Vinciguerra, R. et al. Detection of keratoconus with a new biomechanical index. J. Refract. Surg. 32, 803–810. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20160629-01 (2016).
Yang, K., Xu, L., Fan, Q. & Ren, S. Association between corneal stiffness parameter at the first applanation and keratoconus severity. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 6667507. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6667507 (2020).
Zadnik, K., Barr, J. T., Gordon, M. O. & Edrington, T. B. Biomicroscopic signs and disease severity in keratoconus. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group. Cornea 15, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-199603000-00006 (1996).
Tuft, S. J., Moodaley, L. C., Gregory, W. M., Davison, C. R. & Buckley, R. J. Prognostic factors for the progression of keratoconus. Ophthalmology 101, 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31313-3 (1994).
Hwang, S., Lim, D. H. & Chung, T. Y. Prevalence and incidence of keratoconus in South Korea: A nationwide population-based study. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 192, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.04.027 (2018).
Abu Ameerh, M. A., AlRefai, R. M. & Al Bdour, M. D. Keratoconus patients at Jordan University Hospital: A descriptive study. Clin. Ophthalmol. 6, 1895–1899. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S38287 (2012).
Fink, B. A. et al. Differences in keratoconus as a function of gender. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 140, 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.03.078 (2005).
Shetty, R., Sureka, S., Kusumgar, P., Sethu, S. & Sainani, K. Allergen-specific exposure associated with high immunoglobulin E and eye rubbing predisposes to progression of keratoconus. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 65, 399–402. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_217_17 (2017).
Najmi, H. et al. The correlation between keratoconus and eye rubbing: A review. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 12, 1775–1781. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2019.11.17 (2019).
Ben-Eli, H., Erdinest, N. & Solomon, A. Pathogenesis and complications of chronic eye rubbing in ocular allergy. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 19, 526–534. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000571 (2019).
Agrawal, V. B. Characteristics of keratoconus patients at a tertiary eye center in India. J. Ophthalmic Vis. Res. 6, 87–91 (2011).
Shneor, E. et al. Characteristics of 244 patients with keratoconus seen in an optometric contact lens practice. Clin. Exp. Optom. 96, 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/cxo.12005 (2013).
Nemet, A. Y., Vinker, S., Bahar, I. & Kaiserman, I. The association of keratoconus with immune disorders. Cornea 29, 1261–1264. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181cb410b (2010).
Szczotka-Flynn, L. et al. Disease severity and family history in keratoconus. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 92, 1108–1111. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.130294 (2008).
Millodot, M., Shneor, E., Albou, S., Atlani, E. & Gordon-Shaag, A. Prevalence and associated factors of keratoconus in Jerusalem: A cross-sectional study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 18, 91–97. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286586.2011.560747 (2011).
Karimian, F., Aramesh, S., Rabei, H. M., Javadi, M. A. & Rafati, N. Topographic evaluation of relatives of patients with keratoconus. Cornea 27, 874–878. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e31816f5edc (2008).
Gordon-Shaag, A. et al. Risk factors for keratoconus in Israel: A case–control study. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 35, 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12237 (2015).
Hashemi, H. et al. High prevalence and familial aggregation of keratoconus in an Iranian rural population: A population-based study. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 38, 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.12448 (2018).
Jing, L. et al. Development and enrolee satisfaction with basic medical insurance in China: A systematic review and stratified cluster sampling survey. Int. J. Health Plann. Manag. 32, 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2430 (2017).
Gothwal, V. K. et al. Assessment of the impact of keratoconus on vision-related quality of life. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 2902–2910. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10783 (2013).
Aydin Kurna, S., Altun, A., Gencaga, T., Akkaya, S. & Sengor, T. Vision related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 694542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/694542 (2014).
Tatematsu-Ogawa, Y. et al. The disease burden of keratoconus in patients’ lives: Comparisons to a Japanese normative sample. Eye Contact Lens 34, 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0b013e3180515282 (2008).
Cingu, A. K. et al. Impact of collagen cross-linking on psychological distress and vision and health-related quality of life in patients with keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens 41, 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000129 (2015).
Panthier, C., Moran, S. & Bourges, J. L. Evaluation of vision-related quality of life in keratoconus patients, and associated impact of keratoconus severity indicators. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 258, 1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-020-04680-1 (2020).
Shetty, R. et al. Current review and a simplified “five-point management algorithm” for keratoconus. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 63, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.151468 (2015).
Owens, H. & Gamble, G. A profile of keratoconus in New Zealand. Cornea 22, 122–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003226-200303000-00008 (2003).
Mandathara, P. S. et al. Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking. Oman J. Ophthalmol. 12, 177–180. https://doi.org/10.4103/ojo.OJO_43_2018 (2019).
Wollensak, G., Spoerl, E. & Seiler, T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 135, 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(02)02220-1 (2003).
Vinciguerra, P. et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology 116, 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.09.048 (2009).
Dekkers, O. M., Egger, M., Altman, D. G. & Vandenbroucke, J. P. Distinguishing case series from cohort studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 156, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201030-00006 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The present study granted the support provided by the Henan Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science and National Key Clinical Specialties Construction Program of China.
Funding
This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81200664), Basic research and Cultivation Foundation for Young Teachers of Zhengzhou University (No. JC202051049), Special program for basic research of Henan Eye Hospital (No. 20JCZD003), Henan Young Health Science and Technology Innovation Outstanding Program (No. YXKC2020023), Henan Provincial Building Key Program (No. SBGJ202002028), Henan Provincial Medical Science and Technology Joint Program (No. LHGJ20200066), and Open Program of Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology (No. 2018-04). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.R. contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Q.F., Y.G., B.Z., F.M., D.Z., and C.P.; K.Y. and L.X. analyzed the data and written the manuscript, K.Y., L.X. and S.R. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, K., Xu, L., Fan, Q. et al. A hospital-based study on clinical data, demographic data and visual function of keratoconus patients in Central China. Sci Rep 11, 7559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87291-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87291-y
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The Chinese keratoconus (CKC) cohort study
European Journal of Epidemiology (2024)
-
A high body mass index strengthens the association between the time of eye rubbing and keratoconus in a Chinese population: a case control study
BMC Public Health (2023)