Abstract
Diseased Anabas testudineus exhibiting signs of tail-rot and ulcerations on body were collected from a fish farm in Assam, India during the winter season (November 2018 to January 2019). Swabs from the infected body parts were streaked on sterilized nutrient agar. Two dominant bacterial colonies were obtained, which were then isolated and labelled as AM-31 and AM-05. Standard biochemical characterisation and 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequencing identified AM-31 isolate as Aeromonas hydrophila and AM-05 as Aeromonas jandaei. Symptoms similar to that of natural infection were observed on re-infecting both bacteria to disease-free A. testudineus, which confirmed their virulence. LC50 was determined at 1.3 × 104 (A. hydrophila) and 2.5 × 104 (A. jandaei) CFU per fish in intraperitoneal injection. Further, PCR amplification of specific genes responsible for virulence (aerolysin and enterotoxin) confirmed pathogenicity of both bacteria. Histopathology of kidney and liver in the experimentally-infected fishes revealed haemorrhage, tubular degeneration and vacuolation. Antibiotic profiles were also assessed for both bacteria. To the best of our knowledge, the present work is a first report on the mortality of farmed climbing perch naturally-infected by A. hydrophila as well as A. jandaei, with no records of pathogenicity of the latter in this fish.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Aeromonas is a genus comprising of Gram-negative, oxidase-positive, non-spore-forming, facultative, anaerobic, rod-shaped bacteria responsible for causing infectious diseases in fishes as well as humans1,2. With a high degree of adaptability in fresh, estuarine as well as marine habitats, these microorganisms are one of the major etiological agents of fish species and other aquatic organisms3. The mesophilic bacterium Aeromonas hydrophila is an opportunistic and zoonotically-important motile fish pathogen reportedly responsible for causing epizootic ulcerative syndrome, haemorrhagic septicaemia and pathological changes on the tail and fins of fishes4,5. Toxins identified in A. hydrophila, viz. haemolysins, enterotoxins and/or endotoxins, are the major virulence factors that lead to their pathogenicity and overall disease progression6. Freshwater teleosts like channel catfish, pacu, tilapia and trout, when infected with A. hydrophila, show poor growth, loss of appetite, erratic swimming, stagnation and anorexia, and free mucus and ulceration on fins and/or body, respectively4,5,7,8,9,10. Pathogenicity of Aeromonas jandaei is reported in a few fish species like Anguilla anguilla11, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus12 and Oreochromis niloticus13. However, A. jandaei is also known to cause wound infections in immunocompetent and immunocompromised humans when exposed to freshwater sources14,15.
The freshwater air-breathing teleost, Anabas testudineus is a highly demanded food fish in India due to its nutrient-rich flesh. Being ubiquitous throughout Indochina and Southeast Asia16, A. testudineus has the potential to be a suitable candidate species of fish farming. However, farmed Anabas are prone to bacterial infections mostly due to the presence of Aeromonas, Flavobacterium, Pseudomonas, Salmonella and Staphylococcus17. Apart from being unfit for consumption, a diseased fish exhibiting ulcerations and tail-rot becomes aesthetically unpleasant to the consumer. This can eventually lead to a lesser demand for the species in the local fish markets, and, consequently, create huge economic loss to the fish farmer. During the winter season of 2018–2019 (i.e. between November and January), ulceration and fin-rot followed by high mortality (approximately 50%) was recorded in individuals of A. testudineus in a local fish farm of Assam, India. The primary objective of the present study was to isolate and characterize the (predominant) bacteria causing mortality in these diseased Anabas individuals, and confirm the pathogenicity of the isolated bacteria via search of specific virulence-associated genes and experimental re-infections in disease-free A. testudineus.
Results
Morphological and biochemical characterization
Dominant colonies were obtained of the two bacterial isolates, AM-31 and AM-05, which displayed circular morphology with average diameter of 2–3 mm and appeared yellowish on nutrient agar. Both isolates were motile, Gram-negative, oxidase positive, catalase positive, O/129 resistant and produced gas on glucose fermentation. All tested biochemical characteristics of both isolates are presented in Table 1.
Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA and rpoB genes
PCR amplification of total genomic DNA of both isolates using 16S rRNA bacterial universal primers yielded ~ 1500 bp amplicons. The results of 16S rRNA gene sequencing of isolate AM-31 revealed 99.93% similarity with four reference strains, viz. A. hydrophila ATCC 7966 (GenBank accession no. NR 074,841.1), A. hydrophila JCM 1027 (GenBank accession no. NA 113342.1), A. hydrophila ATCC 7966 (GenBank accession no. 118944.1), and A. hydrophila CCM 7232 (GenBank accession no.NR 043638.1); while that of the isolate AM-05 revealed 99.86% similarity with two reference strains, viz. A. jandaei CDCO787-80 (GenBank accession no.: NR 0370132) and A. jandaei ATCC 49568 (GenBank accession no.: NR 119040), respectively. Also, PCR amplification of the rpoB gene yielded amplicons of ~ 550 bp of both isolates. Isolate AM-31 had 100% query coverage with 99.40% identity with the reference strain A. hydrophila JCM 1027 (GenBank accession no.: LC200411), and isolate AM-05 had 99.61% identity with A. jandaei strain 1459 (GenBank accession no.: MG098879). An almost-complete 16S rRNA and rpoB sequence containing < 1% undetermined positions was obtained for both the isolates.
The gene sequences determined for the two representative isolates in this study were deposited in GenBank (Accession numbers: MN097841 and MN204041 for 16S rRNA gene, and MN977195 and MN977194 for rpoB gene). The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) clustered the isolate AM-31 with Aeromonas hydrophila and isolate AM-05 with A. jandaei, respectively. These clusters were also strongly supported by their high bootstrap values.
Clinical signs and virulence
Intraperitoneal injection of AM-31 and AM-05 isolates in disease-free Anabas testudineus individuals resulted in ulcerations and fin-rot, similar to as observed in natural infections (Fig. 2). The fishes developed symptoms of excessive mucus secretion, followed by gradual development of grayish-white lesions towards the posterior half of body that later extended to the caudal fin. The anal region exhibited scale loss, which then developed into ulcers, and the fins appeared reddish that later formed conspicuous fin rot. All clinical signs commenced within 48 h of artificial infection.
Mortality was recorded within 15 days, and the calculated lethal concentrations (LC50) for AM-31 and AM-05 were 1.3 × 104 and 2.5 × 104 CFU/fish, respectively (Table 2). The infected fish showed severe haemorrhage and blood congestions notably in the liver (Fig. 3). However, no mortality was recorded in the control groups (i.e. the PBS-injected and without injection).
Hemolysin assay
Positive haemolytic activity (yellow colour) was observed for both isolates with halo diameters of 0.9 mm (AM-31) and 1.4 mm (AM-05), respectively.
PCR detection of virulence-associated genes
Cytotoxic enterotoxin was detected in both the isolates. But, aerolysin gene was detected only in isolate AM-05.
Histological changes in kidney and liver
Histopathological examination of the experimentally-challenged A. testudineus showed haemorrhages and vacuolar degeneration of renal tubules of kidney and severe vacuolation in liver (Fig. 4).
Sensitivity towards antimicrobials
AM-31 isolate showed sensitivity towards 15 of the 20 tested antibiotics (approximately 75%); whereas AM-05 was sensitive to all of them (i.e. 100%) (Table 3).
Discussion
Based on the combination of biochemical and molecular characterization, the present study confirms the occurrence of Aeromonas hydrophila (isolate AM-31) and A. jandaei (isolate AM-05) in naturally-infected farmed Anabas testudineus with visible signs of tail-rot and ulceration on body.
Starch hydrolysis is one of the important tests to identify species of Aeromonas18. As A. hydrophila and A. jandaei both tested positive to starch hydrolysis (undetermined so far), this biochemical property will help in improved characterization and identification of the two species in future. Sorbitol fermentation and (lactose + urea) assimilation were found positive for both species, which is also an important phenotypic characteristic to distinguish mesophilic A. hydrophila from its complex members19,20,21. A. hydrophila differs from A. jandaei in characteristic of its sucrose and esculin hydrolysis positivity. Besides sucrose negative, A. jandaei is mannitol-positive; which further supports its earlier description as a genospecies DNA group 9 A. sobria, later re-named as A. jandaei14.
Molecular markers like 16S rRNA and rpoB have wide uses in identification, characterization and measurement of microbes. Sequencing of these two housekeeping genes has proven to be a useful tool in species delineation of the genus Aeromonas, and previous studies have successfully identified Aeromonads using the same22,23,24,25. Clustering of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequence of isolate AM-31 (GenBank Accession no.: MN097841), with maximum bootstrap values, confirmed its identity as A. hydrophila, placing A. rivipollensis and A. dhakensis as sister taxa. Similarly, the high sequence similarity of isolate AM-05 (GenBank Accession no.: MN204041) with referential sequences of A. jandaei confirmed its identity, placing A. finlandensis, A. lacus, A. veronii and A. fluvialis as sister taxa. The present molecular data validates the use of DNA sequencing in phylogenetic construction for enhancing our knowledge of bacterial identification and epidemiology23. The BLAST results of the rpoB fragments of both isolates AM-31 [99.4% similar to the reference strain of A. hydrophila (LC200411)] and AM-05 [99.6% similar to A. jandaei (MG098879)] additionally confirmed their identities. The phylograms based on both housekeeping genes, show consistent clustering of both isolates with their reference strains of Aeromonas species, thereby strongly supporting the present identification.
Virulence-associated factors in bacteria may include secreted enzymes9, cytotoxic enterotoxins26,27, hemolysins28, siderophores29 and aerolysins30, respectively. The positive response to haemolysin activity by A. hydrophila as well as A. jandaei in the present study confirms the toxicity of these isolates. Earlier studies on haemolytic activity of members of Aeromonas, too, reported toxicity to be strongly associated with enterotoxin production31, and that, haemolytic and cytotoxic activities could frequently relate a predominant bacteria to A. hydrophila32.
The pathogenicity tests were performed to analyse the capacity of A. hydrophila and A. jandaei to induce disease in healthy A. testudineus. The tests indicated their virulence to Anabas and the clinical signs of artificially-infected fish were similar to those observed in the naturally-infected individuals. Re-isolation of the same bacteria from experimentally-infected fish also fulfilled Koch’s postulates33. But, the nature of symptoms and the percentage mortality caused by the bacterial isolates at varied doses of intraperitoneal injection suggest that low concentrations of bacterial load (or with minimal stress factors) in the surviving environment leads to mild pathogenicity. Similar findings were reported in Nile tilapia re-challenged with A. veronii and A. jandaei13. Pathological lesions and mortality rate were milder in natural infection than in fishes infected artificially. Confinement of the fishes in aquaria during the experimental infection with increasing bacterial load on the host fish may have played a vital role to exhibit such symptoms.
Hossain et al.34 reported A. hydrophila to be pathogenic to A. testudineus, reporting 100% mortality @ 9.2 × 107 CFU/fish. However, results obtained in the present experimental infection strongly proves A. hydrophila and A. jandaei to be equally pathogenic to A. testudineus with 100% mortality observed at much lower concentrations of 3.4 × 106 and 4.2 × 106 CFU/fish, respectively. The LC50 values for A. hydrophila (= 1.3 × 104 CFU/fish) and A. jandaei (= 2.5 × 104 CFU/fish) additionally support their lethality for farmed Anabas populations.
Screening for virulence-associated genes is one of the rational approaches in determining whether Aeromonas strains have the potential to be virulent50. Present study showed that A. hydrophila (isolate AM-31) and A. jandaei (isolate AM-05) were positive for the enterotoxin gene, which corroborates with the findings of Pablos et al.35. Further, this result is also concurrent with the haemolytic activity of these bacteria discussed earlier and, thus, both proving to be potent pathogens of A. testudineus. Contrary to the positive detection of aerolysin gene (aerA) in A. jandaei, A. hydrophila was, however, aerA negative. Although aerA gene is closely related to haemolytic, cytotoxic and enterotoxic activities of enterotoxin gene as reported in most Aeromonas strains32, the possible contradiction in the present study may be due to variations in prevalence of aerA in Aeromonas with respect to different geographical locations36.
Several studies reported that chronic infections of A. hydrophila cause dermal ulcerative lesions with focal hemorrhages and inflammation. Haemorrhage and vacuolar degeneration in renal tubules of kidney in experimentally-challenged specimens corroborates with similar findings made on Oreochromis niloticus experimentally-challenged with A. hydrophila7. Marked cytoplasmic vacuolations in liver tissues also correlate with previous studies on vacuolar degeneration in the parenchymatous organs and necrosis and haemorrhages caused by non-proliferative bacteria in teleosts37. These alterations may be toxin-induced owing to the presence of the enterotoxin gene in both bacterial isolates as discussed above.
AM-31 and AM-05 both, showed variable degrees of antibiogram resistance. Antibiotic resistance to penicillin and ampicillin as revealed for AM-31 isolate from the antibiogram study correlates with previous reports on multiple drug resistance of A. hydrophila38. However, A. jandaei was susceptible to all the antibiotics tested. Both bacteria exhibited high sensitivity for gentamycin and norfloxacin among all other antibiotics tested. Higher sensitivity for specific antibiotics (or the lack of any resistance towards them) may be due to the lack of awareness among local fish farmers within the Assam state (or northeast India) on the possible use of antibiotics towards disease prevention or treatment. Due to poor economic background, the farmers are more dependent on the traditional use of lime (calcium carbonate) and/or potassium permanganate as water disinfectant or disease treatment. Thus, antibiotic resistance may not have reached an alarming stage yet in these areas as compared to other regions of the world. Variation in sensitivity and resistance pattern may be partly due to different isolation sources and environmental conditions as well39. However, several antibiotics used to characterize the bacteria in our study, except florfenicol, erythromycin and sulphonamide group, are prohibited for use in aquaculture40.
In conclusion, the isolation of Aeromonas hydrophila (AM-31) and A. jandaei (AM-05) from diseased A. testudineus, their role in pathogenicity by re-infection and the presence of virulent genes corroborates the active contribution of motile Aeromonads towards pathogenesis in cultured fish species. We confirm that A. hydrophila and A. jandaei can infect farmed A. testudineus, evident as visible ulcers and haemorrhage on the body and fins as well as tissues within. To the best of our knowledge, this is a first record on the mortality of farmed Anabas naturally-infected by A. hydrophila as well as A. jandaei, with no available records on pathogenicity of the latter bacterium in this fish. As culture of A. testudineus in India is gaining momentum given its high market demand, the present study will act as baseline data on the pathogenic role of A. hydrophila and A. jandaei in this fish, opening up future scopes for investigation on their possible transmission (or opportunistic role) onto other cultivable fish species of the region, and therefore, aid in the advancement of appropriate preventive measures and management activities.
Methods
Ethical statement
The protocols of the present study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) of Gauhati University, Assam, India (Permit No. IAEC/Per/2018/PP-IAEC/2018-039). All experiments were performed in accordance with the IAEC guidelines and regulations.
Bacterial isolation
Live specimens (N = 50) of naturally-infected Anabas testudineus, exhibiting haemorrhagic ulcerations and tail-rot (see Supplementary Fig. S1 online), were collected from a local fish farm (26°27ʹ21″ N; 91°22ʹ53″ E) in Assam (India) between November 2018 and January 2019. The moribund Anabas individuals were euthanized using an overdose of clove oil prior-to-use for bacterial isolation and histopathological studies. After sedation, diseased fishes were aseptically washed with 70% ethyl alcohol and the ulcerated areas treated with a heated scalpel in order to reduce contamination. After sterilization, swabs were taken with a sterilized loop from the ulcerated body parts as well as kidneys and streaked on sterilized nutrient agar (NA) (Himedia) plates. The NA plates were then incubated at 29 (± 2) °C for 48 h and the growth of bacterial colonies (if any) was observed. Two dominant growing bacterial colonies were selected and purified through subculture by multiple streaking on NA medium. These were then marked and labelled as two isolates: AM-31 and AM-05. The isolates were further processed for biochemical and molecular identification. The bacterial isolates were also cultured in LB broth (Himedia) containing 10% glycerol and then kept in − 80 °C for long time storage.
Morphological and biochemical characterization of bacterial isolates
Pure cultures of the AM-31 and AM-05 isolates were inoculated on NA medium overnight at 29 °C and the colony morphology was observed. The isolates were subjected to Gram staining followed by microscopic observation. Sub-culturing of both isolates in LB at 29 °C was done prior to biochemical characterization as per Martin-Carnahan et al.42. Probable species level identification of the bacterial isolates followed Popoff and Véron43 and Abbott et al.44.
Molecular identification based on 16S rRNA and rpoB gene amplification
The genomic DNA of both isolates AM-31 and AM-05, cultured in LB at 29 °C overnight in an orbital shaking incubator, was extracted using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol and stored at − 20 °C until use. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal bacterial primers according to the standard protocol of Martin and Collen45 and the rpoB (RNA polymerase beta subunit) gene was amplified following the protocol of Liu et al.46, respectively. PCR reactions for each gene comprised of 25 µl ready-to-use master mix (R2523-100RXN, Sigma), 2.5 µl each of the forward and reverse primers and 5 µl DNA templates, and the final volume was made to 50 µl using nuclease-free water. A negative control (without DNA template) was taken as well. The qualities of the PCR-amplified products for both genes were checked by 1% (w/v) agarose gel (containing ethidium bromide) electrophoresis in TBE buffer. The PCR products were then purified using QIA quick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol, and outsourced to AgriGenome Labs Private Limited, Cochin (India) for Sanger sequencing. Sequences obtained for the gene datasets were edited using Clustal W (inbuilt in MEGA 7)47 and a BLAST search was performed in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database to identify their nearest neighbour(s). Phylogenetic trees were constructed from evolutionary distances using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) with Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) evolutionary sequence models. The tree branches were authenticated by bootstrap analyses of 1000 replicates. Pseudomonas sharmana (NR 043470.1) and P. pectinilytica (NR 156860.1) were taken as out-groups for rooting trees of the 16S rRNA dataset.
Pathogenicity test
To test the pathogenicity of isolates AM-31 and AM-05, disease-free, healthy individuals of A. testudineus (N = 160; weighing approximately 22–40 g) were collected from aquaculture farms of the Barpeta District of Assam, India, with a constant practice of carp, murrel, catfish and/or Anabas culture. After collection, the fishes were acclimatized in 80 L glass aquaria (@ 30 individuals in each aquaria) 14 days prior-to-challenge. All disease-free individuals were anaesthetized in a 50 ppm clove oil solution following Shameena et al.41, with a recovery time of 4–5 min, prior to proceeding with the experimental infections.
AM-31 and AM-05 isolates were cultured in LB at 30 °C overnight the day before the experimental challenge with continuous shaking. The isolates were then centrifuged and suspended in PBS at six different concentrations of each as follows—for AM-31, the concentrations ranged from 3.4 × 102–3.4 × 107 CFU/fish; while for AM-05, the concentrations ranged from 4.2 × 102–4.2 × 107 CFU/fish, respectively (CFU values were calculated from conventional plate counting) (Table 2).
An experimental setup was designed comprising 12 groups. Each group was represented by 10 individuals of A. testudineus in a 30 L aquarium. Of these, six groups were separated for the bacterial isolate AM-31, and 0.1 ml of each of the six prepared AM-31 bacterial suspensions was injected intraperitoneally to the individuals of each group in order of their increasing concentrations. The same experiment was conducted for the remaining six groups with the prepared suspensions of the bacterial isolate AM-05.
Also, two groups were prepared as control against the bacterial isolate AM-31, both comprising of 10 individuals of A. testudineus in 30 L aquaria. Of these, one group was injected with 0.1 ml of PBS to each individual; while the other group was maintained as without any injection. Similarly, two additional groups (each with 10 individuals) were prepared as control against the isolate AM-05.
Clinical signs and mortality (if any) of fish in all the respective groups were then recorded everyday up to 15 days post challenge.
Haemolysis assay
Haemolysis test was carried out in tryptic soy agar plates (TSA) with 5% whole sheep blood48. Both the bacterial isolates were streaked on TSA containing 5% sheep RBCs, incubated at 30 °C for 24 h and checked for haemolytic activity by detecting a lucid haemolytic zone formed around the colony. The zone diameters were measured with a plastic measuring ruler.
Detection of virulence-associated genes
PCR amplification of the virulence-associated genes [aerolysin (aerA) and enterotoxin (act)] from the genomic DNA was performed using different set of primers, amplification conditions and the expected product sizes (Table 4).
Histopathological study
Kidney and liver tissues from Anabas post artificial infection with the bacterial isolates (@ dozes of 3.4 × 106 CFU/fish for AM-31 and 4.2 × 106 CFU/fish for AM-05; each with 100% morality) were fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin (NBF) for histological studies. Tissues were then subjected to dehydration through a series of increasing alcohol grades, cleared with xylene and embedded in paraffin following standard method. The paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned at 5 µm using a microtome and stained with haematoxylin and eosin49. Pathological changes manifested in the tissue sections were examined under a Leica DM 3000 microscope at 40 × magnification.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test
Antibiotic sensitivity or resistivity was tested on Mueller–Hinton agar plates inoculated with 0.1 ml of overnight broth culture of both isolates (1 × 107 CFU/ml of AM-31 and 1 × 106 CFU/ml of AM-05) following Bauer’s disc diffusion method50. Antibiotic-impregnated discs (Himedia, India), comprising of 20 antimicrobials, were placed on the solid medium and the plates were incubated at 30 °C. After 24 h, the antibiotic sensitivity was determined by measuring the diameter (in mm) of the zone of inhibition formed around the disc, which were expressed as mean ± standard deviation of five replicates. The radius of zone of inhibition was scaled from the centre of the antibiotic disc to the end of the clear zone where bacteria could be seen growing. Results were interpreted on the basis of zone diameter as sensitive and resistant following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute51.
Statistical analysis
The mortality data obtained were subjected to Probit Analysis following Finney52 for determination of LC50 values using SPSS (Version 16)53 and Minitab (Version 19.2.0)54 software.
Data availability
All data generated during the current study are included in this article and its Supplementary Information files. The nucleotide sequences are freely accessible at the NCBI database (Accession numbers: MN097841, MN204041, MN977195 and MN977194).
References
Figueras, M. J. Clinical relevance of Aeromonas sM503. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 16, 145–153 (2005).
Janda, J. M. & Abbott, S. L. The genus Aeromonas: Taxonomy, pathogenicity, and infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23, 35–73. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00039-09 (2010).
Plumb, J. A. Health Maintenance and Principal Microbial Diseases of Cultured Fish (Iowa State University Press, 1999).
Austin, B. & Austin, D. A. Bacterial Fish Pathogens: Diseases in Farmed and Wild Fish (Praxis Publishing, 1999).
Marinho-Neto, F. A. et al. Morphological, microbiological and ultrastructural aspects of sepsis by Aeromonas hydrophila in Piaractus mesopotamicus. PLoS ONE 14, e0222626. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222626 (2019).
Chopra, A. K. et al. The cytotoxic enterotoxin of Aeromonas hydrophila induces proinflammatory cytokine production and activates arachidonic acid metabolism in macrophages. Infect. Immun. 68, 2808–2818 (2000).
Afifi, S. H., Al-Thobiati, S. & Hazaa, M. S. Bacteriological and histological studies on Aeromonas hydrophila infection of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) from fish farms in Saudi Arabia. Assiut. Vet. Med. J. 84, 195–205 (2000).
Abd-El-Rhman, A. M. M. Antagonism of Aeromonas hydrophila by propolis and its effect on the performance of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Fish Shellfish Immun. 27, 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2009.06.015 (2009).
Liu, P. C., Chuang, W. H., Tu, C. C. & Lee, K. K. Purification of a toxic cysteine protease produced by pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila isolated from rainbow trout. J. Basic Microbiol. 50, 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201000105 (2010).
Pridgeon, J. W. & Klesius, P. H. Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila to channel catfish Ictaluras punctatus fingerlings in the presence and absence of bacterial extracellular products. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 95, 205–215. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02357 (2011).
Esteve, C., Biosca, E. G. & Amrao, C. Virulence of Aeromonas hydrophila and some other bacteria isolated from European eel Anguilla anguilla reared in fresh-water. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 16, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao016015 (1993).
Kumar, K. et al. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of a virulent Aeromonas jandaei associated with mortality of farmed Pangasianodon hypophthalmus in India. Isr. J. Aquacult. Bamid. 67, 1–7 (2015).
Dong, H. T. et al. Aeromonas jandaei and Aeromonas veronii caused disease and mortality in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (L.). J. Fish Dis. 40, 1395–1403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.12617 (2017).
Carnahan, A., Fanning, G. R. & Joseph, W. Aeromonas jandaei (formerly Genospecies DNA Group 9 A. sobria), a new sucrose-negative species isolated from clinical specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29, 560–564 (1991).
Janda, M. & Abbott, S. L. Evolving concepts regarding the genus Aeromonas: An expanding panorama of species, disease presentations, and unanswered questions. Clin. Infect. Dis. 27, 332–344 (1998).
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (eds.). FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org, version 04/2019 (2019).
Chhanda, M. S., Parvez, I., Rumi, N. A., Hosen, H. A. & Islam, RMd. Identification of pathogenic bacteria from infected Thai koi (Anabas testudineus). Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 5, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.3329/ajmbr.v5i1.41046 (2019).
Miṅana-Galbis, D., Farfán, M., Lorén, J. G. & Fusté, M. C. Biochemical identification and numerical taxonomy of Aeromonas spp. isolated from environmental and clinical samples in Spain. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 420–430 (2002).
Altwegg, M., Steigerwalt, A. G., Altwegg-Bissig, R., Lüthy-Hottenstein, J. & Brenner, D. J. Biochemical identification of Aeromonas genospecies isolated from humans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28, 258–264 (1990).
Häunninen, M. L. Phenotypic characteristics of the three hybridization groups of Aeromonas hydrophila complex isolated from different sources. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76, 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2672.1994.tb01102.x (1994).
Kaznowski, A. Identification of Aeromonas strains of different origin to the genomic species level. J. Appl. Microbiol. 84, 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00364.x (1998).
Mollet, C., Drancourt, M. & Raoult, D. rpoB sequence analysis as a novel basis for bacterial identification. Mol. Microbiol. 26, 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6382009.x (1997).
Kupfer, M., Peter, K., Bozena, M. K., Raffaele, P. & Antonella, D. Genetic relationship of Aeromonas strains inferred from 16S rRNA, gyrB and rpoD gene sequences. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 2743–2751. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63650-0 (2006).
Nagar, V., Shashidhar, R. & Bandekar, J. R. Characterization of Aeromonas strains isolated from Indian foods using rpoD gene sequencing and whole cell protein analysis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 745–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1212-1 (2013).
Beaz-Hidalgo, R. et al. Aeromonas aquatica sp. nov., Aeromonas finlandiensis sp. nov. and Aeromonas lacus sp. nov. isolated from finfish waters associated with cyanobacterial blooms. Syst. Appl. Microb. 38, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2015.02.005 (2015).
Chopra, A. K., Houston, C. W., Peterson, J. W. & Jin, G. F. Cloning, expression and sequence analysis of a cytolytic enterotoxin gene from Aeromonas hydrophila. Can. J. Microbiol. 39, 513–523 (1993).
Santos, Y., Toranzo, A. E., Barja, J. L., Nieto, T. P. & Villa, T. G. Virulence properties and enterotoxin production of Aeromonas strains isolated from fish. Infect. Immun. 56, 3258–3293 (1998).
Ljungh, A., Wretlind, B. & Mollby, R. Separation and characterization of enterotoxin and two hemolysins from Aeromonas hydrophila. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. B 89, 387–397 (1981).
Barghouthi, S., Young, R. & Olson, M. O. J. Amonabactin, a novel tryptophan- or phenylalanine-containing phenolate siderophore in Aeromonas hydrophila. J. Bacteriol. 171, 1811–1816. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.171.4.1811-1816.1989 (1989).
Howard, S. P. & Buckley, J. T. Activation of hole-forming toxin aerolysin by extracellular processing. J. Bacteriol. 163, 336–340 (1985).
Burke, V. et al. The microbiology of childhood gastroenteritis: Aeromonas species and other infective agents. J. Infect. Dis. 148, 68–74 (1983).
Bondi, M., Messi, P., Guerrieri, E. & Bitonte, F. Virulence profiles and other biological characters in water isolated Aeromonas hydrophila. Microbiologica 23, 347–356 (2000).
Walker, L., Levine, H. & Jucker, M. Koch’s postulates and infectious proteins. Acta Neuropathol. 112, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-006-0072-x (2006).
Hossain, M. F., Rashid, M. M. & Sayed, M. A. Experimental infection of indigenous climbing perch Anabas testudineus with Aeromonas hydrophila bacteria. Prog. Agric. 22, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.3329/pa.v22i1-2.16472 (2011).
Pablos, M. et al. Identity, virulence genes, and clonal relatedness of isolates from patients with diarrhea and drinking water. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 29, 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-010-0982-3 (2010).
Albert, M. J. et al. Prevalence of enterotoxin genes in Aeromonas spp. isolated from children with diarrhoea, healthy controls, and the environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 3785–3790 (2000).
Hassan, M. A., Noureldin, E. A., Mahmoud, M. A. & Fita, N. A. Molecular identification and epizootiology of Aeromonas veronii infection among farmed Oreochromis niloticus in Eastern Province, KSA, Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 43, 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2017.06.001 (2017).
Hedges, R. W., Smith, P. & Brazil, G. Resistance plasmids of Aeromonads. J. Gen. Microbiol. 131, 2091–2095 (1985).
Nagar, V., Shashidhar, R. & Bandekar, J. R. Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial resistance of Aeromonas strains from various retail food products in Mumbai, India. J. Food Sci. 76, B486–B492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.20303.x (2011).
Serrano, P. H. Responsible Use of Antibiotics in Aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 469 (FAO, 2005).
Shameena, S. S., Kumar, K., Kumar, S., Kumar, S. & Rathore, G. Virulence characteristics of Aeromonas veronii biovars isolated from infected freshwater goldfish (Carassius auratus). Aquaculture 518, 734819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734819 (2020).
Martin-Carnahan, A. & Joseph, S. W. Aeromonas. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria (eds Whitman, W. B. et al.) 1–44 (Wiley, 2015).
Popoff, M. & Véron, M. A taxonomic study of the Aeromonas hydrophila-Aeromonas punctata group. J. Gen. Microbiol. 94, 11–22 (1976).
Abbott, S. L., Cheung, W. K. & Janda, J. M. The genus Aeromonas: Biochemical characteristics, atypical reactions, and phenotypic identification schemes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2348–2357. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.6.2348-2357.2003 (2003).
Martin, F. P. & Collen, M. C. Bias in template-to-product ratios in multitemplate PCR. Appl. Environ. Biol. 64, 3724–3730 (1998).
Liu, C. et al. Aeromonas shuberti as a cause of multi-organ necrosis in internal organs of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. J. Fish Dis. 41, 1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfd.128448 (2018).
Kumar, S., Strecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).
Kuhn, I. et al. Diversity, persistence and virulence of Aeromonas strains isolated from drinking water distribution systems in Sweden. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 2708–2715 (1997).
Roberts, R. J. Fish Pathology (Wiley-Blackwell, 2012).
Bauer, A. W., Kirby, W. M. M., Sherris, J. C. & Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45, 493–496 (1966).
CLSI. Methods for Antimicrobial Dilution and Disk Susceptibility Testing of Infrequently Isolated or Fastidious Bacteria. CLSI Guideline M45 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2010).
Finney, D. J. Probit Analysis (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997). https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600600940.
IBM Corp. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc. (2007). [Computer software]
Minitab, LLC. Getting started with Minitab 19 (2020). https://www.minitab.com
Wang, G. et al. Detection and characterization of the hemolysin genes in Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas sobria by multiplex PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 1048–1054. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.41.3.1048-1054.2003 (2003).
Kingombe, C. I. et al. PCR detection, characterization, and distribution of virulence genes in Aeromonas spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5292–5302 (1999).
Acknowledgements
The present study was financially supported by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India (Project ID: BT/PR17991/AAQ/3/816/2016). The first author is grateful to the University Grants Commission, New Delhi for fellowship grant under UGC-BSR scheme. The authors acknowledge A. S. Sahul Hameed (C. Abdul Hakeem College, Vellore) and Rina Chakrabarti (Department of Zoology, Delhi University) for their valuable suggestions to carry out the work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.M., H.C., A.D. and D.S. conceptualized and designed the experiments. A.M. performed the experiments. A.D. conducted the phylogenetic analysis. A.M., H.C. and D.S. drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mazumder, A., Choudhury, H., Dey, A. et al. Isolation and characterization of two virulent Aeromonads associated with haemorrhagic septicaemia and tail-rot disease in farmed climbing perch Anabas testudineus. Sci Rep 11, 5826 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84997-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84997-x
- Springer Nature Limited