Abstract
The biosorptive potentials of three aquatics-based biosorbents, including shells of a bivalve mollusk and scales of two fish species for Pb removal from aqueous solutions were evaluated, for the first time. A Box–Behnken design with the response surface methodology was used to investigate the effects of the seven important variables (contact time, temperature, initial concentration, dosage, size, salinity and pH) on the sorption capacity of the sorbents. Among the seven studied factors, the effects of biosorbent dosage, initial concentration and pH were significant for all the response variables, while biosorbent size was not significant for any of the responses. The initial concentration was the most influential factor. The presence of Pb ions on the surfaces of the biosorbents after the adsorption was clearly confirmed by the SEM–EDX and XRF analyses. The maximum sorption capacities of the biosorbents were comparable to the literature and the descending order was as follows: scales of Rutilus kutum and Oncorhynchus mykiss and the shells of Cerastoderma glaucum. The isotherm studies revealed Langmuir model applicability for the Pb adsorption by R. kutum and O. mykiss scales, while Freundlich model was fitted to the adsorption C. glaucum shells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Pollution of aquatic ecosystems caused by heavy metals has been one of the major environmental threats over the last several decades and is of high ecological significance. These concerns are arise from their non-biodegradability, high toxicity and huge discharge into the environment1. Heavy metals occur naturally in aquatic ecosystems, but with large variations in concentration. They also enter the environment from various man-made sources. These metals are released into the aquatic environments through direct discharges into both freshwater and marine ecosystems or through indirect routes2, 3. These hazardous pollutants tend to transfer through the food chains and potentially can cause adverse effects on the health of any organisms at any trophic level. Hence, the removal of heavy metal from contaminated waters has become one of the most imminent environmental problems4, 5.
Pb(II) is classified as a non-essential prevalent toxic metal ions and major environmental health problems, which affects multiple body systems including the hematologic, neurologic, gastrointestinal, renal and cardiovascular systems6, 7. Lead in the form of Pb(II) is one of the most stable and toxic ions in aquatic ecosystems and shows considerable tendency to accumulate in various organs of aquatic organism8, 9. The major sources of Pb(II) in aquatic ecosystem are anthropogenic, including municipal wastewater and industrial effluents discharged from different industries manufacturing batteries, pigments, cables, pipes, ceramics, gasoline, tobacco, steel, food packaging glasses and pesticides10, 11. Annually, large quantities of heavy metals, including lead (derived from various urban, agricultural and industrial sources), enter the Southern Caspian Sea either directly or through rivers12, 13.
There are some widely used methods for removal of Pb(II) and other heavy metal ions from wastewater, such as membrane filtration, electrolytic recovery, precipitation, ion exchange, adsorption and so on; however, these conventional methods can cause some important problems such as management of generated wastes, production of toxic sludge that require safe disposal and high cost14, 15. In the past three decades, there has been a growing interest in developing low cost and environment friendly materials for removal of heavy metals from wastewater and natural environment16.
Adsorption is a highly effective and economic separation and purification method that is increasingly being utilized for the removal of heavy metals ions from industrial effluents17,18,19. Up to now, a wide variety of natural and synthetic adsorptive materials, such as natural materials, industrial byproducts, forest and agricultural wastes, biopolymers, compost and nanomaterials, have been studied and some of them are currently employing extensively for the removal of different metal ions20,21,22,23.
Biosorption is an emerging and promising technology for the removal of toxic metals from industrial effluents and natural waters24. The biosorption process utilizes the ability of nonliving biomaterials to eliminate heavy metals from wastewater effluents using metabolically mediated or physico-chemical pathway of uptake, and is based on different mechanisms (e.g. absorption, adsorption, surface complexation, ion exchange and precipitation)11, 25, 26.
A wide range of biosorbents have been applied to remove heavy metal ions, including Pb(II), from aqueous solutions. Among them, according to the relatively limited but promising previous studies, two types of aquatic origin biosorbents have been found to have good potential in this regard, which include fish scales4, 27,28,29,30,31,32 and mollusk shells1, 5, 15, 33,34,35,36. Fish scales are consist mainly of collagen fibers and hydroxyapatite. The structure of collagen shows that it contains the possible functional groups, which are involved in the biosorption of heavy metals. On the other hand, the porous structure of hydroxyapatite has relatively high adsorption capacity37, 38. The studies on application of bivalve mollusk shells have demonstrated that these naturally occurring, inexpensive and plentiful materials, which are very common around the coasts of many coastal countries, can be considered as potential cost-effective biosorbents39, 40.
The main objective of this research was to investigate the removal potential of lead (II) from aqueous solutions by using three aquatic origin biosorbents, i.e. scales of two fish species (Rutilus kutum and Oncorhynchus mykiss) and shells of a bivalve mollusk (Cerastoderma glaucum). The influences of some important parameters, i.e. sorbent dosage, sorbent size, contact time, temperature, initial concentration, pH and salinity) on the sorption capacity of the biosorbents were also evaluated. The three selected biosorbents are environmentally friendly, economically feasible and abundant. Rutilus kutum is the most important commercial bony fish in southern part of the Caspian Sea41. Oncorhynchus mykiss is the leading freshwater farmed species in Iran42. Cerastoderma glaucum has a relatively wide distribution along the Iranian coast of the Caspian Sea43. All the three studied sorbents are easily accessible in large quantities at a very low cost. Rainbow trout, O. mykiss is the main cold water cultured fish species in Iran44. Caspian Kutum, R. kutum is the most commercially important bony fish at the southern Caspian Sea41. Cerastoderma glaucum is one of the dominant bivalve species in the southern Caspian Sea and its dead shells can be collected easily, inexpensively and abundantly along the coast45, 46.
It is noticeable that, so far, no report is available on the use of the three investigated biomaterials as biosorbents for the removal of heavy metals or other pollutants from contaminated waters. Moreover, the simultaneous effects of seven important parameters on the adsorbance efficiency of the selected biosorbents have also been evaluated. Internationally, no other similar research has been conducted in this regard.
Materials and methods
Sample collection and preparation
Shells of C. glaucum (about 2 kg) were collected from the beaches of Miankaleh area (southeastern Caspian Sea). Fifty rainbow trout specimens were obtained from a fish farm located in Mazandaran Province. Fifty R. kutum specimens were also randomly collected from commercial beach seine catches in the coastal area (Fig. 1). The scales of the specimens were taken from above the lateral line. The shells and scales samples were transferred into plastic containers and taken to the laboratory. The scales and shells were washed several times with fresh running water to eliminate any adhering dirt and debris, and then soaked in double distilled water for 24 h, and later rinsed three times with double distilled water. The scales and shell samples dried at sunlight for two days. They were dried thereafter in oven at 60 °C until a constant weight. The dried shell fragments were then ground using a mortar and pestle and the scales pulverized in a laboratory blender. The biosorbents screened through a set of standard nylon sieves to obtain the desired particle sizes (0.4, 0.7 and 1.0 mm). The samples were then preserved in clean air-tight polyethylene containers for the further use35, 47, 48.
Map of the Caspian Sea showing the locations of collection of the specimens. 1: Rutilus kutum, 2: Cerastoderma glaucum, 3: Oncorhynchus mykiss. Map created by the authors using ArcGIS 10.7 (https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/).
Metal solution preparation
The Pb stock solution was prepared by dissolving 1.598 g of lead (II) nitrate (Merck, Germany) in 100 mL of ultrapure water, diluted with deionized water up to 1000 mL. The working solutions (30, 65 and 100 mg/L) were prepared by diluting the stock solution with double distilled water. The pH of the solutions was adjusted by the addition of 0.1 M HCl or NaOH. All chemicals used in the present study were of analytical grade11, 15.
Biosorbents characterization
The morphology of the biosorbents before and after Pb(II) ion adsorption as well as the chemical composition were analyzed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (SNE-4500 M, SEC, South Korea) coupled with Energy Dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX). Before the analyses, the samples were mounted onto aluminum stubs using double-sided carbon tape, gold coated with a sputter coater. The accelerating voltage for SEM imaging was 20 kV49. The biosorbents were also analyzed before and after Pb adsorption for surface functional groups using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) (Agilent Cary 630 FTIR, Agilent Technologies, USA). The analysis was conducted using potassium bromide pellets as a reference material. The samples were examined in the range 650–4000 cm−16, 35, 48. Moreover, X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) (PW 1480, Philips, Netherlands) was used to determine the chemical composition of the biosorbents before and after the Pb adsorption28, 50.
Adsorption isotherms
Biosorption isotherms were evaluated by varying the initial metal ion concentrations from 30 to 170 mg/L. In the isotherm experiments, with regards to the results concerning effects of the independent variables on the responses, the values of other independent variables (i.e. biosorbent dosage, contact time, temperature, pH and salinity) remained constant. In order to diagnose the nature of adsorption (homogeneous or heterogeneous) onto the biosorbents, four theoretical isotherm models, namely Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Dubinin-Radushkevich were used.
Experimental design and data analysis
Box–Behnken experimental design (BBD) combined with response surface method (RSM) was employed to assess and optimize the effects of selected variables on the responses. Each of the independent variables included three levels coded as − 1, 0, and + 1 for low, average, and high values, respectively. The experimental ranges of the independent variables were as follows: initial concentration (30–100 ppm), biosorbent dosage (0.1–0.3 g/L), biosorbent size (0.4–1.0 mm), contact time (2–5 h), pH (5.5–7), salinity (0.2–10 ppt) and temperature (20–30 °C). A BBD with 7 factors, 3 levels and 62 runs (with 6 replicates at center point) was used for the optimization of the three responses (PbR: concentration of Pb adsorbed by scales of Rutilus kutum; PbO: concentration of Pb adsorbed by scales of Oncorhynchus mykiss and PbC: concentration of Pb adsorbed by shells of Cerastoderma glaucum). Design-expert software (version 11) was utilized to analyze the experimental data. The statistical validation was performed by assessment of statistical parameters such as model F-value, lack of fit F-value, coefficient of determination (R2), adjusted R-squared (R2Adj), predicted R-squared (R2Pred), predicted residual error sum of squares (PRESS) and adequate precision (AP). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied to evaluate the statistical significance and adequacy of the model (one test for each response variable)51. By constructing a normal probability plot of the residuals, the normality assumption of each ANOVA was checked. Subsequently, the response variables were transformed to achieve normality using Box-Cox procedure (natural logarithmic transformation for all the responses)52, 53.
Biosorption studies and metal analysis
The biosorption experiments were carried out discontinuously in Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL). The sample size in the Erlenmeyer was 100 mL. The prepared solutions were shaken at 180 rpm using a vibratory shaker. The experiments were done by varying the seven independent variables according to the Box-Behnken experimental design mentioned previously. The desired pH of the solutions was maintained by adding 1 mol/L HCl or NaOH at the beginning of the experiment. All the experiments were performed in triplicates and the mean values were presented. After the biosorption process, the biosorbents were separated from the aqueous solution by filtering using Watchman No.1 filter paper. The biosorbents samples were prepared for Pb concentration analysis in accordance with the MOOPAM Instruction54. Atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (SOLAAR M5, Thermo Electron Corp., Verona, WI, USA) was employed to measure the concentrations of lead in the biosorbents before and after the process. The difference between these two was considered as the concentration of Pb adsorbed by the biosorbents. The detection limit (calculated on the basis of ten determinations of the blanks as three times the standard deviations of the blank) was 0.05 ppm. The analytical accuracy and precision were verified using standard reference materials (SRMs) (oyster tissue: NIST 1566 b; tuna fish flesh: IAEA-436). The recovery rates were in the range of 96.4–102.6%. The precision of the analyses were estimated by calculating the relative standard deviation (RSD/%) based on replicate analyses (n = 10) of the SRMs. The precision was less than three percent RSD for all the determinations.
Results
Statistical analysis and models
As mentioned previously, in order to measure how well the suggested model fits the experimental data, different statistical parameters were evaluated. The resulting models in the present research were tested by ANOVA. Table 1 shows the ANOVA results for all the three responses. According to the results presented in the table, F-ratios of the models were 53.29, 27.90 and 26.57, while their lack-of-fits were 1.46, 0.64 and 4.46 for PbR, PbO and PbC, respectively. The low probability value of the models (p < 0.0001) and non-significant (p > 0.05) lack of fits indicate that all the three models are highly significant and valid for the present work. The quadratic polynomial models (except for PbC, which was linear) representing the relationship between the response variables and the chosen factors were generated using the values of the experimental data and given below (Eqs. 1, 2 and 3):
where A = Sorbent dosage, B = Sorbent size, C = Contact time, D = Temperature, E = Initial concentration, F = pH and G = Salinity.
These equations can be used to predict the responses for given levels of individual factors.
Table 2 lists the parameters used to fit the polynomial models.
In order to investigate the relative effects of each of the independent variables on the response variables (strength and direction of the effects), the perturbation plots were used, which are presented in Fig. 2.
In order to evaluate the interaction of factors on the response variables, response surface and contour plots were drawn (Fig. 3). As can be seen, each plot indicates the simultaneous effects of two independent variables within their investigated ranges, on the response, while keeping the other factors constant, generally at central point.
Structural characteristics of the sorbents
The FTIR spectra were used to determine the frequency changes in the functional groups existing on the surfaces of the biosorbents, before and after the Pb adsorption. Figure 4 shows the approximate positions of the absorbance peaks for the corresponding functional groups. Table 3 summarizes the assignments for the corresponding functional groups before and after the adsorption. As shown in the figure and Table, in case of C. glaucum shell, there is a shift in the calcite group from 854.814 to 856.134 cm−1, Si–O group from 1082.454 to 1082.789 cm−1, CH2 and CH3 groups from 1445.946 to 1449.595 cm−1, while the C=O group shifts from 1785.548 to 1786.826 cm−11. In the case of the other two studied sorbents, some shifts and disappearances of the peaks correspond to different functional groups can also be deduced from Fig. 4 and Table 3 (i.e. alkanes, sulfonates, C–O, C–N, CH2, CH3, C–H for O. mykiss scale and alkanes, sulfonates, C–O, C–N, CH2, CH3, N=O, C–C, C–H, OH, NH2 for R. kutum scale).
The chemical composition (weight percentage) of the three biosorbents, before and after the adsorption, based on the results of XRF analyses, are presented in Table 4.
Figure 5 shows the surface morphologies of the three selected biosorbents before and after the biosorption, characterized using SEM. The EDX spectra of R. kutum scales, O. mykiss scales and C. glaucum shells are presented in Fig. 6. The spectra are depicted for dark and white areas of the biosorbents’ surfaces, before and after the adsorption, along with their elemental composition. In each case, the relevant weight percentages are also presented.
SEM images and corresponding EDX spectra of the three selected biosorbents (R: R. kutum scales; O: O. mykiss scales; C: C. glaucum shells): (1) the selected white (W) and dark (D) spots on the samples (× 200 magnification), (2) EDX spectra of the white (upper) and dark (lower) spots before Pb biosorption, (3) EDX spectra of the white (upper) and dark (lower) spots after Pb biosorption. Insets: Elemental composition (weight percentage).
Adsorption isotherms
The values of parameters associated with equilibrium isotherms of Pb removal onto the three biosorbents are shown in Table 5. Figure 7 shows the isotherm models that are fitted to our experimental data.
Discussion
Data fitting to the model and ANOVA
Considering models 1–3, the values coefficients of determination (i.e. 0.93, 0.86 and 0.87 for PbR, PbO and PbC, respectively) indicated a good fit between predicted values and the experimental data points. For a good model fit R2, should be more than 0.8. In general, the closer the R2 value is to 1.00 indicating the better fitting and more suitable model for the prediction of the response variables. In all the responses, differences between predicted R2 and adjusted R2 were less than 0.2 (Table 2), which indicates reasonable agreement between regression coefficients. According to the Table, the AP ratios for all the responses are considerably greater than 4, which describe good model discrimination. Normally the ratio greater than 4 is desirable, for the models to be used effectively. In all the responses, in comparison with the other models, the linear model (for PbC) showing lower PRESS value (the smaller the PRESS value, the better the model’s predictive ability). The low SD and CV values indicate the high precision and reliability of the experiments. According to Table 2, SD values were 0.30, 0.41 and 0.21, whereas CV values were 3.96, 5.66 and 3.50 for PbR, PbO and PbC, respectively. As a general rule, CV should not be higher than ten percent. The CV values calculated in this study were much lower than the limit, indicating high precision of the conducted experiments. The low values of CV showed that the variabilities between the predicted and observed values are low and were indicative of high reliability of the experiments51, 55,56,57,58.
Considering the above mentioned points, all the selected models have high R2 value, significant F-value, a non-significant lack-of-fit p-value, desirable AP values and low SD and CV. The results confirm that the responses can be predicted with high reliability. Hence, the models can be applied for predictive purposes.
Effects of factors on the responses
Effects of main variables
Significance of the effects
Table 1 can be used to determine which factors significantly affect each response59. According to the table, factors biosorbent dosage, initial concentration and pH were significant for all the responses (p < 0.05), whereas biosorbent size was not significant for any of the responses. The contact time and temperature were significant only for PbR and PbC, respectively. The salinity was significant for the response variables PbR and PbC.
Order of the effects
The relative effects of significant factors on the responses were determined by evaluating the p-values and F-ratios (Table 1). The parameter with the lowest p-value and the highest F-ratio shows the greatest impact on the response variables60. As mentioned previously, the relative influences of the parameters on the response variables may also be deduced from the perturbation plots (Fig. 2). In a perturbation plot, when the variable produces a steep slope or curvature, then the response variable is sensitive to that parameter, while a relatively flat line shows insensitivity to change in that particular variable61, 62. Furthermore, the relative effects can also be distinguished by comparing the coefficients of the factors in the regression models. To evaluate the relative effect of the independent variables, the coefficients calculated in the regression Eqs. (1, 2 and 3) can be directly compared63. Description of the order of effects of the studied factors on each of the three response variables are provided separately below:
PbR: The initial concentration had the highest F-ratio and the lowest p-value (301.13 and < 0.0001, respectively). Hence, this factor had the greatest effect on PbR, followed by biosorbent dosage, pH, salinity and contact time (Table 1). The similar results can be obtained from Fig. 2a. The perturbation plot clearly shows that of the five significant independent variables, biosorbent dosage and initial concentration affect the value of PbR more than the others. With regards to the values of the model coefficients in Eq. 1, a similar decreasing order of effects (with the relevant coefficients) was also observed as follows: initial concentration (1.07), biosorbent dosage (0.7235), pH (0.6499), salinity (0.2312) and contact time (0.1768).
PbO: According to Table 1, the factor of initial concentration had the highest F-ratio and the lowest p-value (169.00 and < 0.0001, respectively). Hence, this factor produced the highest effect on the response, followed by biosorbent dosage and pH. Figure 2b clearly shows that initial concentration has the main and the major effect on PbO followed by biosorbent dosage and pH, which have the medium and low effects on the response, respectively. Considering the regression coefficients in Eq. 2, among the three significant factors, the highest and lowest effects on PbO were for initial concentration and pH, respectively.
PbC: From the perturbation plot (Fig. 2c), the following sequence of relative effects of the factors on PbC can be inferred: initial concentration > salinity > pH > biosorbent dosage > temperature. The steep slopes in opposite directions for initial concentration and salinity are quite clear. The significantly lower slopes for pH, biosorbent dosage and temperature show less sensitivity of PbC to changes in these factors. These results are consistent with those presented in Table 1 and Eq. 3. As can be seen, the factors initial concentration and salinity indicated the highest F-ratios and the regression coefficients and the lowest p-values.
Positive and negative effects
The regression equations (Eqs. 1, 2 and 3) as well as the perturbation plots (Fig. 2) were used to investigate whether the effect of each factor on the responses is positive or negative. In the equations, negative and positive signs before each term show antagonistic and synergistic effects on the response, respectively64. The significant negative and positive effects on each response variable are described below:
PbR: As can be seen in Fig. 2a and Eq. 1, the increase in the factors initial concentration and contact time has positive effect on PbR. On the other hand, the increase in biosorbent dosage has negative effect on PbR. It can be noticed from the figure that the factors pH and salinity have also the same effect, but less strong.
PbO: It is observed from Fig. 2b and Eq. 2 that the PbO increases with increasing initial concentration and decreasing biosorbent dosage and pH.
PbC: Fig. 2c and Eq. 3 depict that with increase in salinity and temperature reduction in PbC was observed (negative effect), while factors initial concentration, pH and biosorbent dosage have a positive effect on the response variable.
In order to simplify the comparisons, all of the above-mentioned descriptions about the significance of the effects, the relative effects of significant factors, and the positive or negative effects are summarized in the Table 6.
Interaction between influencing factors
The response surface and contour plots (Fig. 3) are very useful to see the interaction effects of the parameters on the response variables. In general, the shape of the contour plot indicates the natures and extents of the interactions between parameters. A circular contour plot shows that the mutual interactions between corresponding variables are insignificant. In contrast, elliptical or distorted plots are evidence of significant interactions59, 65,66,67. For each response variable, only the significant interactions (based on Table 1) are shown and described separately below. The elliptical contour shapes in the figures confirm that all the mutual interactions are significant.
PbR: Fig. 3a depicts that with increase in pH reduction in PbR was observed, but it was observed that with increment in biosorbent dosage, PbR was decreased. The maximum PbR (7655 ppm) occurred at biosorbent dosage of 0.1 g/L and pH 5.5, while the PbR (493 ppm) was minimal at biosorbent dosage of 0.3 g/L and pH 7. Figure 3b shows that with lower pH and salinity, higher PbR was observed. The PbR was maximal (3009 ppm) at salinity of 0.2 ppt and pH 5.5, while the minimum PbR (493 ppm) was observed at salinity of 10 ppt and pH 7. At higher initial concentration and lower temperature, higher PbR was observed (Fig. 3c). The maximum PbR (8376 ppm) occurred at initial concentration of 100 ppm and temperature of 20 °C, while the PbR (414 ppm) was minimum at initial concentration of 30 ppm and temperature of 30 °C.
According to Eq. 1, all the three mentioned mutual interactions had negative effects on the PbR.
PbO: With regards to Fig. 3d, the maximum PbO occurred at low salinity and high initial concentration. The PbO was maximal (5355 ppm) at initial concentration of 100 ppm and salinity of 0.2 ppt, while the minimum PbO (310 ppm) was observed at initial concentration and salinity of 30 ppm and 10 ppt, respectively.
According to Eq. 2, interaction between salinity and initial concentration had negative effects on the PbO.
Possible causes of the effects
With regards to the results presented in Tables 1 and 6 and Fig. 2, the following explanations can be given about the causes of observed significant effects and comparison with similar studies, separately:
Initial concentration
The initial concentration had a positive significant effect on all the three dependent variables. The similar findings were also reported on lead biosorption by fish scales and bivalve shells4, 39. This could be arisen from the fact that the initial concentration actually plays the role of the driving force required to control the resistance of the mass transfer of metal ions between the aqueous phase and the surface of the sorbents, so higher initial concentrations of metal ions may increase their adsorption. Moreover, with increasing initial Pb ions concentration, higher interaction between the metal ions and the biosorbents, and consequently enhancing the availability of the binding sites on the surface of the biosorbents, could be expected30, 48, 68.
Biosorbent dosage
It seems that in the present study, the selected range of the biosorbents dosage for the response variables PbR and PbO is higher than the equilibrium levels (i.e. maximum adsorption capacity of the biosorbents with a certain absorbate), while in terms of PbC the reverse trend could be observed. Therefore, higher uptake at low biosorbent concentrations for PbR and PbO could be due to availability of lower number of Pb ions per unit mass of the biosorbents. It can also be relevant to aggregation of the biosorbents particles at higher concentrations, thereby lead to a decline in the surface area of adsorbent and also an increase in the diffusion path length11, 39. The trend observed for PbC is possibly due to the availability of more functional groups (adsorption sites) along with the increase of the biosorbent dosage. Similar findings had been reported by other studies as well36, 69, 70.
pH
Generally, the pH of a solution is one of the most effective environmental parameters for adsorption of heavy metal ions because it might affect strongly the degree of ionization and adsorption sites on the sorbent surface during the biosorption process36, 48, 71. In the present research, as was largely expectable, pH was found to be one of the important parameters affecting the adsorption of Pb by the studied biosorbents (Table 2).
The findings of several similar researches on the influences of a wider range of pH (3–7) on the metal sorption process of various biosorbents show that in most cases, with the gradual increment of pH, the following specific trends can be observed: (a) strong positive influences: with an increase in pH, there is an increase in ligands with negative charges which results in increase binding of positively charged ions such as Pb2+ via the mechanism of ion exchange14, 47, 72, (b) slight positive influences: at higher pH, the reduction in adsorption is possibly due to the abundance of OH− ions, causing increased hindrance to diffusion of organics contributing to the metal ions. The main reason for the small increment in metal removal may be that the adsorption sites are no more influenced by the pH change71, 72, (c) negative influences: some more increase in pH usually leads to precipitation of the hydroxide form of the metals ions; therefore true adsorption would not be feasible; thus a decline in the percentage of metal ions removal could be observed5, 39.
The results of the present study in terms of scales of the two fish species are consistent with those obtained by some other researchers, e.g. El-Sheikh and Sweileh73; Bajić et al.6 and Zayadi and Othman4 that explained the Pb biosorption capacity of fish scales decreases gradually with increasing pH value of the solution, in the pH range approximately similar to our study. The possible reason for this trend is explained above (regarding the negative effect of pH). The observed reverse trend in terms of PbC could be attributed to the fact that the interaction between the functional groups of the biosorbent and the heavy metal ions is dependent upon nature of the surface of biosorbent and chemistry of the biosorbate solution, which in turn depends on the pH of the solution74, 75. For this reason, in the current study, the maximum biosorption for the scales of both fish species (PbR and PbO) occurred similarly at pH 5.5, while that for the bivalve shells (PbC) was found at pH 7.
Salinity
PbR and PbC were significantly and negatively affected by the salinity, but no significant effect could be observed on PbO. Generally, salinity is an important parameter in the biosorption process because the existence of the electrolyte ions in an aqueous environment will cause changes in adsorbate activities, and sorbent surface charge by electrostatic (Coulomb) force76. So far, no previous study has been performed on the influence of this parameter on biosorption of metals using mollusk shells and fish scales. However, according to the results of some researches in which other adosorbents have been applied, it can be inferred that the increase in the biosorptive capacity with decreaing salinity is likely because of the fact that at lower sodium-to-lead ratios, the less competition for binding sites between sodium and lead ions could be occurred, and vice versa77, 78.
Contact time
PbR was the only response variable that significantly affected by the contact time. The observed positive effect was also reported by Zayadi and Othman4, who found that an increase in contact time leads to increase in Pb removal from aqueous environment by fish scales as biosorbent. This implies that initially, the biosorbent contains a higher number of binding sites for the binding of Pb. In the studies that the range of contact time was wider compared to that of current research, after a lapse of some time, depending on the biosorbent and the solution environment, the number of unoccupied sites decreased and gradually became saturated5, 39, 79.
Temperature
Of the three response variables, only PbC was significantly affected by temperature. This negative effect has also been observed in some other studies concerning the use of mollusk shells as biosorbents for metals removal from aqueous solutions (e.g. Shahzad et al.5; Weerasooriyagedra and Anand Kumar40). Since, it is believed that sorption reactions are normally exothermic and, therefore, the decrease in biosorption capacity at higher temperatures likely occurs due to desorption caused by an increase in the available thermal energy. In other words, higher temperature induces higher mobility of the adsorbate causing desorption5, 80. It is noticeable that, based on the results of various related studies, the effect of temperature on the biosorption process shows different and contradictory behaviors81. The positive effect of temperature on the process, which has been observed in most similar studies, could be attributed to either higher affinity of sites for heavy metal ions or many more binding sites being available on the relevant particle surface at higher temperatures15, 39.
Characterization of the biosorbents
FT-IR analysis
Various functional groups play a significant role in the adsorption processes of metal ions as well as the sorption potential of adsorbents. The number and type of functional groups located on the surface of different sorbents affect the adsorption mechanisms82, 83. The functional groups actually provide sites for the effective adsorption of heavy metals on the adsorbent surface, and their adsorption potential can be influenced by a relatively wide range of factors84. The results of this study showed that the three investigated biosorbents consist of a variety of functional groups capable of binding heavy metal ions. The complexation of functional groups with Pb2+ changes their chemical environment and thus leads to shifts or disappearance of the peaks in the FTIR spectra. In other words, the peak shifts and disappearances observed after the adsorption can be considered strong evidence for adsorption of Pb2+on the surface of the biosorbents85, 86. The presence of similar functional groups as well as their shifts after Pb adsorption on the surface of different aquatics-based biosorbents were also reported by some other researchers4,5,6, 27, 29, 39, 87.
XRF analysis
The XRF results (Table 4) showed that the chemical composition of O. mykiss and R. kutum scales was dominated by CaO and P2O5, whereas the contents of the other elements were rather low. In the case of C. glaucum shells, calcium oxide was also the main constituent, but P2O5was not detectable. These findings are in concordance with the results reported by several other researchers who analyzed the chemical composition of other aquatics-based sorbents4, 15, 29, 39, 70, 88. It was observed that after Pb adsorption, ion percentage of other elements was decreased. In this case other elements may be involved in ion exchange process with the lead ions.
SEM and EDX analysis
The micrographs revealed that the surfaces of the scales of the two species were relatively homogeneous and smooth, but in the case of C. glaucum shell an uneven and heterogeneous surface could be observed89, 90. Generally, the differences in adsorption capacity of different types of biosorbents depend on a number of factors, among which the surface morphology, composition and porosity are especially important91,92,93. Therefore, the observed differences in the surface microstructures of the three biosorbents (Fig. 5a) can be effective in their different adsorption capacities. The observed significant changes in the morphological characteristics of the biosorbents and some precipitation on their surfaces after the adsorption (Fig. 5b) are evidence of the potential of the biosorbents for adsorption and removal of the metal ions from aqueous solutions94. The results of several other studies have also shown that the surface morphology of the adsorbents of aquatic origin has changed after the adsorption of some heavy metals (e.g. Villanueva-Espinosa et al.95; Prabu et al.27; Muthulakshmi Andal et al.84; Yousefi et al.1; Xu et al.15, Dulla et al.96, El-Naggar et al.97). Generally, the emergence of post-biosorption peaks that characterize Pb (Fig. 6) indicates the binding of the metal ions to the sorbents surfaces. Hence, with regards to the results of EDX analysis, there are strong and logical reasons for adsorption of Pb ions on the investigated biosorbents98. The concentration of the adsorbed elements is directly related to the height of the corresponding EDX peaks99. The SEM analyses showed the existence of two regions, i.e., dark and white areas. The dark region is mainly composed of proteins containing large amounts of carbon, oxygen, and sulfur, whereas the white region is mainly consists of inorganic components, including high amounts of calcium and phosphorus4, 95. The difference between the two regions can also be deduced from the elemental composition of the adsorbent surface, as shown in the insets of the figures. With regards to Fig. 6, in the case of C. glaucum shells and O. mykiss scales, the greater Pb adsorption was detected in the white region, whereas in the case of R. kutum scales the darker area showed the higher adsorption capacity. The different adsorption values observed in the white and dark regions are probably mainly caused by the differences in number and type of the functional groups, microstructure, surface morphology and chemical nature of the sorbents100,101,102.
Sorption isotherms
According to values of regression coefficients (R2), the Langmuir isotherm showed the best fitted values for R. kutum scale (R2 = 0.9934) and O. mykiss scale (R2 = 0.9845) (Table 5 and Fig. 7). Therefore, it can be opined that the two biosorbents may have homogeneous surfaces and monolayer adsorption103. The separation factor (RL) values were between 0 and 1, indicating a favorable adsorption of Pb onto the two biosorbents104. While the Freundlich model was suitable for the equilibrium isotherm of C. glaucum shell (R2 = 0.9860). Contrary to Langmuir isotherm, the Freundlich isotherm is applicable to heterogeneous surfaces and multilayer adsorption105.
Comparison with other aquatics-based biosorbents
The biosorption capacities of the three studied biosorbents in the present study in comparison with those of other biosorbents reported is shown in Table 7. These data show that the sorption capacities of the three biosorbents are comparable to those of other sorbents reported in the literature (within the range of 0.86 and 248.00 mg/g for fish scales and brown seaweed, respectively).
In general, It should be noted that direct comparison of sorption capacities of different biosorbents listed in the table is difficult due to: (a) the sorbents have been investigated under various preparation and test conditions (including contact time, pH, particle size, metal concentration range, temperature, mixing rate and ….), (b) the methods of pre-treatment and preparation of the biosorbents are not similar in different investigations, and (c) the techniques for determining maximum adsorption capacity (e.g. BBD-designed experiments, Langmuir Isotherm, Freundlich Isotherm, Pseudo-second order kinetics) have been different in various studies. The first and second points show the factors that may play an important role in increasing the adsorption capacity of sorbents for a given heavy metal26, 116, and the third point indicates the difference in calculation methods.
With regards to Table 7, a comparison of the three biosorbents studied in the present study shows that the ascending order of the sorption capacity is: the shells of C. glaucum, scales of O. mykiss and scales of R. kutum. Given that the preparation methods and experimental conditions were the same for all three sorbents, these differences in adsorption capacities are probably mostly arose from the differences in surface area, morphology and functional groups117, 118. On the other side, according to Regine et al.119 the role of the functional groups in biosorption of a given metal by a certain biosorbent is related to several factors, including accessibility of the reactive sites, the number of the sites in the biosorbent, chemical state of the sites (i.e. availability), and affinity between the sites and the particular metal.
Conclusion
Among the seven studied parameters in this study, the effects of biosorbent dosage, initial concentration and pH on the Pb biosorptive potential of all the three sorbents were significant (p < 0.05), while biosorbent size was not significant for any of the response variables. It was found that the initial concentration was the most influential factor, which had positive effect on adsorption capacity of the three biosorbents. The considerable effects of initial concentration on adsorption efficiency of various biosorbents for heavy metals have also been reported by some other researchers (e.g. Osu and Odoemelam69; Zayadi and Othman4; Dileepa Chathuranga et al.11; Ayodele and Adekola39; Al-Saeedi et al.36).
The SEM and EDX analyses confirmed Pb biosorption as obvious changes in the surface morphologies of the sorbents, and as appearance of characteristic peaks in the EDX spectra. The XRF results were also confirmed the presence of Pb on the surface of the biosorbents after the adsorption and implied the probable ion exchange between the positively charged ions on the sorbents with Pb ions. The FTIR results showed that the three investigated biosorbents contained several functional groups that can participate in metal binding. The observed shifts and disappearances of the bands indicated that the functional groups were involved or affected by complexation with Pb2+. With regards to the potential roles of functional groups in heavy metals adsorption process120, 121, less diversity of the groups on the surface of C. glaucum shells compared to the other two biosorbents probably contributes to the lower adsorption capacity of this adsorbent (Table 7). In this regard, it should be noted that, the findings of several related studies investigating the role of functional groups in the adsorption of Pb(II) ions by various adsorbents indicate that among the diverse identified functional groups present on the adsorbents surface, the hydroxyl, amine, sulfonate and carboxyl groups play a significant role122,123,124,125,126,127. The peak shifts of the mentioned functional groups were also observed in the biosorbents studied in the present research, especially for the fish scales (Table 7), which confirms the higher adsorption potential of lead ions by these adsorbents compare to the bivalve shells.
Among the isotherm models tested, the Langmuir model was in the best agreement with the experimental data for both PbR and PbO, whereas the Freundlich model agreed well with the adsorption data of PbC.
Generally, it can be concluded that the investigated biosorbents, especially scales of O. mykiss and R. kutum can be considered as potential biosorbents for the removal of Pb from aqueous solutions. The biosorbents are promising alternative to the conventional treatment methods due to their low cost, eco-friendliness and easy availability. However, additional studies are recommended to be conducted in this regard to explore: (a) possible roles of various chemical and physical pretreatment methods of the biosorbents in their heavy metal removal efficiency, (b) influences of other factors on the adsorption capacity of the sorbents, (c) efficiency of the biosorbents in the removal of other heavy metals, (d) possibility of reuse the biosorbents, (e) feasibility of using the selected biosorbents at an industrial scale, (f) possibility of using different biosorbents mixtures for enhancement of heavy metals removal efficiency, and (g) maximum adsorption capacity of other aquatics-based sorbents.
References
Yousefi, Z., Mashayekh-Salehi, A. & Mohammadpour, T. R. A. Biosorption of chromium in aqueous solutions using bivalve mollusk shells through central composite design (CCD) model. Desalin. Water Treat. 57(42), 19877–19889 (2016).
Risjani, Y., Couteau, J. & Minier, C. Cellular immune responses and phagocytic activity of fishes exposed to pollution of volcano mud. Mar. Environ. Res. 96, 73–80 (2014).
Ozseker, K. & Eruz, C. Pollution assessment of toxic metals in representative limnetic ecosystem sediments in the southeastern Black Sea Turkey. Clean Soil Air Water 45(10), 1700407 (2017).
Zayadi, N. & Othman, N. Characterization and optimization of heavy metals biosorption by fish scales. Adv. Mater. Res. 795, 260–265 (2013).
Shahzad, S. et al. Removal of heavy metal lead (Pb) (II) by biosorption process using paper shell mussel (Anodontoides ferussacianus). World J. Pharm. Med. Res. 3(6), 281–288 (2017).
Bajić, Z. J. et al. Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies on removal of Cd(II), Pb(II) and As(V) from wastewater using carp (Cyprinus carpio). Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios. 8(4), 1581–1590 (2013).
Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Rehman, M. Z., Javed, M. R. & Bashir, A. Lead toxicity in cereals and its management strategies: A critical review. Water Air Soil Pollut. 229(6), 211 (2018).
Singh, V., Tiwari, S., Sharma, A. K. & Sanghi, R. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions using Cassia grandis seed gum-graft-poly(methylmethacrylate). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 316, 224–232 (2007).
Ahmed, M. S. & Bibi, S. Uptake and bioaccumulation of water borne lead (Pb) in the fingerlings of a freshwater cyprinid, Catla catla L. J. Anim. Pl. Sci. 20(3), 201–207 (2010).
Momčilović, M., Purenović, M., Bojić, A., Zarubica, A. & Ranđelović, M. Removal of lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto pine cone activated carbon. Desalination 276(1), 53–59 (2011).
Dileepa, C. P. K., Dissanayake, D. M. R. E. A., Priyantha, N., Iqbal, S. S. & Mohamed Iqbal, M. C. Biosorption and desorption of lead (II) by Hydrilla verticillata. Biorem. J. 18, 192–203 (2014).
Tabari, S., Saeedi Saravi, S. S., Bandany, G. A., Dehghan, A. & Shokrzadeh, M. Heavy metals (Zn, Pb, Cd and Cr) in fish, water and sediments sampled form Southern Caspian Sea Iran. Toxicol. Ind. Health 26(10), 649–656 (2010).
Karrari, P., Mehrpour, O. & Abdollahi, M. A systematic review on status of lead pollution and toxicity in Iran; guidance for preventive measures. Daru 20(1), 2 (2012).
Zabochnicka-Świątek, M. & Krzywonos, M. Potentials of biosorption and bioaccumulation processes for heavy metal removal. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 23(2), 551–561 (2014).
Xu, X., Liu, X., Oh, M. & Park, J. Oyster shell as a low-cost adsorbent for removing heavy metal ions from wastewater. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 28(4), 2949–2959 (2019).
Uddin, M. K. A review on the adsorption of heavy metals by clay minerals, with special focus on the past decade. Chem. Eng. J. 308, 438–462 (2017).
Karimi, S., Yaraki, M. T. & Karri, R. R. A comprehensive review of the adsorption mechanisms and factors influencing the adsorption process from the perspective of bioethanol dehydration. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 107, 535–553 (2019).
Ayob, S. et al. A review on adsorption of heavy metals from wood-industrial wastewater by oil palm waste. J. Ecol. Eng. 22(3), 249–265 (2021).
Velusamy, S., Roy, A., Sundaram, S. & Kumar Mallick, T. A review on heavy metal ions and containing dyes removal through graphene oxide-based adsorption strategies for textile wastewater treatment. Chem. Rec. 21(7), 1570–1610 (2021).
Anastopoulos, I., Bhatnagar, A., Bikiaris, D. N. & Kyzas, G. Z. Chitin adsorbents for toxic metals: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 114 (2017).
Ekka, B. et al. Removal of Cr(VI) by silica-titania core-shell nanocomposites: In vivo toxicity assessment of the adsorbent by Drosophila melanogaster. Ceram. Int. 47(13), 19079–19089 (2021).
Mpatani, F. M. et al. Adsorption performance of modified agricultural waste materials for removal of emerging micro-contaminant bisphenol A: A comprehensive review. Sci. Total Environ. 780, 146629 (2021).
Sahu, S., Bishoyi, N., Sahu, M. K. & Patel, R. K. Investigating the selectivity and interference behavior for detoxification of Cr(VI) using lanthanum phosphate polyaniline nanocomposite via adsorption-reduction mechanism. Chemosphere 278, 130507 (2021).
Costa, C. H., Santos, B. Z. D., Yamamura, A. P. G. & Yamaura, M. Adsorption isotherm of uranyl ions by scales of Corvina fish. Int. J. Nucl. Gov. Econ. Ecol. 3(3), 280–286 (2011).
Darge, A. & Mane, S. J. Treatment of industrial wastewater by using banana peels and fish scales. Int. J. Sci. Res. 4(7), 600–604 (2013).
Fomina, M. & Gaddm, G. M. Biosorption: Current perspectives on concept, definition and application. Bioresour. Technol. 160, 3–14 (2014).
Prabu, K., Shankarlal, S. & Natarajan, E. A biosorption of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions using fish scale (Catla catla). World J. Fish Mar. Sci. 4(1), 73–77 (2012).
Zayadi, N. & Othman, N. Removal of zinc and ferum Ions using Tilapia Mossambica fish scale. Int. J. Integr. Eng. 5(1), 23–29 (2013).
Othman, N., Abd-Kadir, A. & Zayadi, N. Mozambique tilapia fish scales as potential biosorbent for Zn and Pb ions removal: kinetic and isotherm studies. In 2nd IWA Malaysia Young Water Professional Conference. 17–20 March 2015, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 1–14 (2015).
Mandal, N., Mondal, S., Mondal, A., Mukherjee, K. & Mondal, B. Response surface modeling of Cu (II) removal from wastewater using fish scale-derived hydroxyapatite: Application of Box-Behnken experimental design. Desalin. Water Treat. 57(33), 15410–15423 (2016).
Adeogun, A. I. et al. Biosorption of Cd2+ and Zn2+ from aqueous solution using tilapia fish scale (Oreochromis sp): Kinetics, isothermal and thermodynamic study. Desalin. Water Treat. 107, 182–194 (2018).
Kwaansa-Ansah, E. E., Nkrumah, D., Nti, S. O. & Opoku, F. Adsorption of heavy metals (Cu, Mn, Fe and Ni) from surface water using Oreochromis niloticus scales. Pollution 5(1), 115–122 (2019).
Gao, Y. J. Removal of cadmium and cobalt from heavy metal solution using oyster shells adsorbent. Asian J. Chem. 25(15), 8537–8540 (2013).
Ambali, A. B., Evbuomwan, B. O. & Momoh, Y. Comparative study on the adsorption capacity of snail and perewinkle shells for the removal of nickel (II) Ion from aqueous solution. Int. J. Geol. Agric. Environ. Sci. 3(1), 39–50 (2015).
Zhao, B. et al. Removal of cadmium from aqueous solution using waste shells of golden apple snail. Desalin. Water Treat. 57(50), 23987–24003 (2016).
Al-Saeedi, J. Y., Akbar, M. M. & Al-Qarooni, I. H. Removal of Pb (II) and Ni (II) ions from aqueous solution by sea snail shells. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 14(3), 17–23 (2019).
Ikoma, T., Kobayashi, H., Tanaka, J., Walsh, D. & Mann, S. Microstructure, mechanical, and biomimetic properties of fish scales from Pagrus major. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 327–333 (2003).
Garrano, A. M. C. et al. On the mechanical behavior of scales from Cyprinus carpio. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 7, 17–29 (2012).
Ayodele, D. T. & Adekola, F. A. Kinetic and thermodynamic studies of the adsorption of lead (II) and zinc (II) Ions onto cockle shell powder. FUW Trends Sci. Technol. J. 1(1), 1–10 (2016).
Weerasooriyagedra, M. S. & Anand, K. S. Review of utilization of mollusca shell for the removal of contaminants in industrial waste water. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 8(1), 282–287 (2018).
Pourang, N., Parafkandeh Haghighi, F. & Moazami, H. R. Hard parts chemical composition as a potentially valuable tool for kutum, Rutilus kutum stock discrimination: A case study of the Southern Caspian Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 207, 194–202 (2018).
Adeli, A. & Baghaei, F. Production and supply of rainbow trout in Iran and the world. World J. Fish Mar. Sci. 5(3), 335–341 (2013).
Bahrebar, S., Negarestan, H., Maghsoudlo, A. & Danehkar, A. Macrobenthic assemblage structure and distribution at the Boojagh Marine National Park, Southern Caspian Sea Iran. Iran. J. Fish Sci. 19(2), 748–767 (2020).
Zorriehzahra, M. J. et al. Identification of some health indicators related to OIE notifiable viral diseases in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) based on the strategic plan for producing specific pathogen free (SPF) broodstock in Iran. Iran. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 5(1), 71–82 (2019).
Mirzajani, A., Hamidian, A. H., Bagheri, S. & Karami, M. Possible effect of Balanus improvisus on Cerastoderma glaucum distribution in the south-western Caspian Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U K. 96(5), 1031–1040 (2016).
Najafi Saleh, H. et al. Data on the acid black 1 dye adsorbtion from aqueous solutions by low-cost adsorbent- Cerastoderma lamarcki shell collected from the northern coast of Caspian Sea. Data Br. 17, 774–780 (2018).
Varshini, J. S. & Das, N. Enhanced uptake of rare earth metals using surface molecular imprinted biosorbents of animal origin: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Int. J. Chemtech. Res. 7(4), 1913–1919 (2015).
Bulut, A., Yusan, S., Aytas, S. & Sert, S. The use of sea shell (Donax trunculus) powder to remove Sr(II) ions from aqueous solutions. Water Sci. Technol. 78(4), 827–836 (2018).
Echlin, P. Handbook of Sample Preparation for Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis 332 (Springer, 2009).
Chojnacka, K. et al. Using XRF and ICP-OES in biosorption studies. Molecules 23(8), 2076. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23082076 (2018).
Kumar, S. S. & Bishnoi, N. R. Coagulation of landfill leachate by FeCl3: process optimization using Box-Behnken design (RSM). Appl. Water Sci. 7, 1943–1953 (2017).
Sahoo, A. K. & Mishra, P. C. A response surface methodology and desirability approach for predictive modeling and optimization of cutting temperature in machining hardened steel. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 5(3), 407–416 (2014).
Tebassi, H. et al. Multi-objective optimization of surface roughness, cutting forces, productivity and power consumption when turning of Inconel 718. Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 7, 111–134 (2016).
MOOPAM. Manual of oceanographic observations and pollutant analysis methods. Kuwait: Regional Organization for Protection of the Marine Environment (ROPME). 543P (2010).
Apul, O. G., Wang, Q., Shao, T., Rieck, J. R. & Karanfil, T. Predictive model development for adsorption of aromatic contaminants by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 2295–2303 (2012).
Abu Amr, S. S., Aziz, H. A. & Bashir, M. J. K. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of semi-aerobic landfill leachate treatment using ozone. Appl. Water Sci. 4(3), 231–239 (2014).
Qiu, P. et al. Application of Box-Behnken design with response surface methodology for modeling and optimizing ultrasonic oxidation of arsenite with H2O2. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 12(2), 164–172 (2014).
Mourabet, M., Rhilassi, A. E., Boujaady, H. E., Bennani-Ziatni, M. & Taitai, A. Use of response surface methodology for optimization of fluoride adsorption in an aqueous solution by Brushite. Arab. J. Chem. 10, S3292–S3302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.028 (2017).
Montgomery, D. C. Design and Analysis of Experiments 8th edn, 752 (Wiley, 2012).
Zar, J. H. Biostatistical Analysis 5th edn, 944 (Prentice- Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, 2010).
Anderson, M. J. & Whitcomb, P. J. RSM Simplified: Optimizing Processes Using Response Surface Methods for Design Of Experiments 2nd edn, 311 (Productivity Press, 2016).
Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C. & Anderson-Cook, C. M. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 4th edn, 699 (Wiley, 2016).
Anderson, M. J. & Whitcomb, P. J. DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation 2nd edn, 241 (Productivity Press, Boca Raton, 2007).
El-Gendy, NSh., Nasser, H. N. & Abu Amr, S. S. Factorial design and response surface optimization for enhancing a biodesulfurization process. Pet. Sci Technol. 32(14), 16669–1679 (2014).
Li, X., Liu, Z. & Chi, Z. Production of phytase by a marine yeast Kodamaea ohmeri BG3 in an oats medium: Optimization by response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 6386–6390 (2008).
Hou, W., Zhang, W., Chen, G. & Luo, Y. Optimization of extraction conditions for maximal phenolic, flavonoid and antioxidant activity from Melaleuca bracteata leaves using the response surface methodology. Plos One 11(9), e0162139 (2016).
Wong, K. H., Li, G. Q., Li, K. M., Razmovski-Naumovski, V. & Chan, K. Optimization of Pueraria isoflavonoids by response surface methodology using ultrasonic-assisted extraction. Food Chem. 231, 231–237 (2017).
Sun, X., Chen, J. H., Su, Z., Huang, Y. & Dong, X. Highly effective removal of Cu(II) by a novel 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane functionalized polyethyleneimine/sodium alginate porous membrane adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 290, 1–11 (2016).
Osu, C. I. & Odoemelam, S. A. Studies on adsorbent dosage, particle sizes and pH constraints on biosorption of Pb (II) and Cd (II) Ions from aqueous solution using modified and unmodified Crasstrotrea gasar (bivalve) biomass. Inter. Arch. Appl. Sci. Technol. 1, 62–68 (2010).
Maghri, I., Kenz, A., Elkouali, M., Tanane, O. & Talbi, M. Textile dyes removal from industrial waste water by Mytilus edulis shells. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 3(1), 121–136 (2012).
Abbar, B. et al. Experimental investigation on removal of heavy metals (Cu2+, Pb2+, and Zn2+) from aqueous solution by flax fibres. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 109, 639–647 (2017).
Jimoh, T. O., Iyaka, Y. A. & Nubaye, M. M. Sorption study of Co (II), Cu(II) and Pb(II) ions removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on flamboyant flower (Delonix regia). Am. J. Chem. 2(3), 165–170 (2012).
El-Sheikh, A. H. & Sweileh, J. A. Sorption of trace metals on fish scales and application for lead and cadmium pre-concentration with flame atomic absorption determination. Jordan J. Chem. 3(1), 87–97 (2008).
Reddya, D. H. A., Harinatha, Y., Seshaiaha, K. & Reddy, A. V. R. Biosorption of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions using chemically modified Moringa oleifera tree leaves. Chem. Eng. J. 162, 626–634 (2010).
Chiban, M., Carja, G., Lehutu, G. & Sinan, F. Equilibrium and thermodynamic studies for the removal of As(V) ions from aqueous solution using dried plants as adsorbents. Arab. J. Chem. 9(2), S988–S999 (2016).
Zhu, C., Dong, X., Chen, Z. & Naidu, R. Adsorption of aqueous Pb(II), Cu(II), Zn(II) ions by amorphous tin(VI) hydrogen phosphate: An excellent inorganic adsorbent. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13, 1257–1268 (2016).
Green-Ruiz, C., Rodriguez-Tirado, V. & Gomez-Gil, B. Cadmium and zinc removal from aqueous solutions by Bacillus jeotgali: PH, salinity and temperature effects. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 3864–3870 (2008).
Park, R., Kim, G., Shen, L., Hong, M. & Navarro, A. Batch adsorption of heavy metals onto chai tea residues for the bioremediation of contaminated solutions. Curr. Top Biotechnol. 8, 51–62 (2014).
Achieng, G. O., Kowenje, C. O., Lalah, J. O. & Ojwach, S. O. Preparation, characterization of fish scales biochar and their applications in the removal of anionic indigo carmine dye from aqueous solutions. Water Sci. Technol. 80(11), 2218–2223 (2019).
Badessa, T. S., Wakuma, E. & Yimer, A. M. Bio-sorption for effective removal of chromium(VI) from wastewater using Moringa stenopetala seed powder (MSSP) and banana peel powder (BPP). BMC Chem. 14, 71 (2020).
El-Naggar, N. E. A., Hamouda, R. A., Mousa, I. E., Abdel-Hamid, M. S. & Rabei, N. H. Biosorption optimization, characterization, immobilization and application of Gelidium amansii biomass for complete Pb2+ removal from aqueous solutions. Sci. Rep. 8, 13456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31660-7 (2018).
Sooksawat, N., Meetam, M., Kruatrachue, M., Pokethitiyook, P. & Inthorn, D. Performance of packed bed column using Chara aculeolata biomass for removal of Pb and Cd ions from wastewater. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 52, 539–546 (2017).
Gupta, V., Treichel, H., Kuhad, R. & Rodriguez-Coutom, S. Recent Developments in Bioenergy Research 1st edn, 472 (Elsevier Science, 2020).
Muthulakshmi Andal, N., Charulatha, S., Gayathri, N. S. & Anuradha, J. A comparative study on the sorption of divalent ions by bivalves shells: Equilibrium and statistical studies. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett. 5(19), 214–223 (2016).
Zhu, Q. & Li, Z. Hydrogel-supported nanosized hydrous manganese dioxide: synthesis, characterization, and adsorption behavior study for Pb2+, Cu2+, Cd2+ and Ni2+ removal from water. Chem. Eng. 281, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.06.068 (2015).
Usman, K., Al-Ghouti, M. A. & Abu-Dieyeh, M. H. The assessment of cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel tolerance and bioaccumulation by shrub plant Tetraena qataranse. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 5658. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42029-9 (2019).
Ighalo, J. O. & Eletta, O. A. A. Response surface modelling of the biosorption of Zn(II) and Pb(II) onto Micropogonias undulatus scales: Box-Behnken experimental approach. Appl. Water Sci. 10(8), 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-01283-3 (2020).
Mustakimah, M., Suzana, Y. & Saikat, M. Decomposition study of calcium carbonate in cockle shell. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 7(1), 1–10 (2012).
Lam, Y. F., Lee, L. Y., Chua, S. J., Lim, S. S. & Gan, S. Insights into the equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics of nickel removal by environmental friendly Lansium domesticum peel adsorbent. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 127, 61–70 (2016).
Mendoza-Castillo, D. I., Reynel-Avila, H. E., Bonilla-Petriciolet, A. & Silvestre-Albero, J. Synthesis of denim-waste-based adsorbents and their application in water defluoridation. J. Mol. Liq. 221, 469–478 (2016).
Homagai, P. L., Ghimire, K. N. & Inoue, K. Adsorption behavior of heavy metals onto chemically modified sugarcane bagasse. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 2067–2069 (2010).
Parida, U., Bastia, T. K. & Kar, B. B. A Study on the water absorption efficiency of porous silica gel prepared from rice husk ash. Asian J. Water Environ. Pollut. 14(1), 83–86 (2017).
Neves, C. V. et al. Phenomenological modeling of reactive dye adsorption onto fish scales surface in the presence of electrolyte and surfactant mixtures. Environ. Technol. 39(19), 2467–2483 (2018).
Park, H. J., Jeong, S. W., Yang, J. K., Kim, B. G. & Lee, S. M. Removal of heavy metals using waste eggshell. J. Environ. Sci. 19(12), 1436–1441 (2007).
Villanueva-Espinosa, J. F., Hernández-Esparza, M. & Ruiz-Treviño, F. A. Adsorptive properties of fish scales of Oreochromis niloticus (Mojarra Tilapia) for metallic ion removal from waste water. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40(16), 3563–3569 (2001).
Dulla, J. B., Tamana, M. R., Boddu, S., Pulipati, K. & Srirama, K. Biosorption of copper(II) onto spent biomass of Gelidiella acerosa (brown marine algae): Optimization and kinetic studies. Appl. Water Sci. 10, 56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-019-1125-3 (2020).
El-Naggar, N. E., Hamouda, R. A., Saddiq, A. A. & Alkinani, M. H. Simultaneous bioremediation of cationic copper ions and anionic methyl orange azo dye by brown marine alga Fucus vesiculosus. Sci. Rep. 11, 3555. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82827-8 (2021).
Bansal, M., Mudhoo, A., Garg, V. K. & Singh, D. Preparation and characterization of biosorbents and copper sequestration from simulated wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 11, 1399–1412 (2014).
Hayeeye, F., Yu, Q. J., Sattar, M., Chinpa, W. & Sirichote, O. Adsorption of Pb2+ ions from aqueous solutions by gelatin/activated carbon composite bead form. Adsorp. Sci. Technol. 36(1–2), 355–371 (2018).
Ramrakhiani, L., Ghosh, S. & Majumdar, S. Surface modification of naturally available biomass for enhancement of heavy metal removal efficiency, upscaling prospects, and management aspects of spent biosorbents: A review. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 180, 41–78 (2016).
De Freitas, G. R., Vieira, M. G. A. & da Silva, M. G. C. Fixed bed biosorption of silver and investigation of functional groups on acidified biosorbent from algae biomass. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26, 36354–36366 (2019).
Jin, C. S., Deng, R. J., Ren, B. Z., Hou, B. L. & Hursthouse, A. S. Enhanced biosorption of Sb(III) onto lving Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain DJHN070401: Optimization and mechanism. Curr. Microbiol. 77, 2071–2083 (2020).
Deng, S. & Chen, Y. A study by response surface methodology (RSM) on optimization of phosphorus adsorption with nanospherical calcium carbonate derived from waste. Water Sci. Technol. 79(1), 188–197 (2019).
Badi, M. Y., Azari, A., Pasalari, H., Esrafili, A. & Farzadkia, M. Modification of activated carbon with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticle composite for removal of ceftriaxone from aquatic solutions. J. Mol. Liq. 261, 146–154 (2018).
Djahed, B., Shahsavani, E., Khalili Naji, F. & Mahvi, A. H. A novel and inexpensive method for producing activated carbon from waste polyethylene terephthalate bottles and using it to remove methylene blue dye from aqueous solution. Desalin. Water Treat. 57(21), 9871–9880 (2016).
Nadeem, R., Ansari, T. M. & Khalid, A. M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic characterization and optimization of Pb(II) biosorption by fish (Labeo rohita) scales. J. Hazard Mater. 156, 64–73 (2008).
Onwordi, C. T., Uche, C. C., Ameh, A. E. & Petrik, L. F. Comparative study of the adsorption capacity of lead (II) ions onto bean husk and fish scale from aqueous solution. J. Water Reuse Desal. 9(3), 249–262 (2019).
Gupta, V., Jaybhaye, S. & Chandra, N. Biosorption studies of copper, chromium, lead and zinc using fins of Catla catla fish. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 5(4), 902–909 (2017).
Castañeda, M., Mirasol, M. S., Raymundo, L. A. & Solidum, J. Biosorption and desorption of Pb(II) from simulated waste water using freshwater snail shells, Melanoides tuberculata Muller (family Thiaridae).In 2nd International Conference on Environment and Bioscience, vol. 44, 54–59 (IACSIT Press, Singapore, 2012).
Forutan, R. et al. Kinetic and equilibrium studies on the adsorption of lead by the chitin of pink shrimp (Solenocera melantho). Entomol. Appl. Sci. Lett. 3, 20–26 (2016).
Iddou, A., Youcef, M. H. & Aziz, A. Biosorptive removal of lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions using Cystoseira stricta biomass: Study of the surface modification effect. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 15, 83–88 (2011).
Sari, A. & Tuzen, M. Biosorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) from aqueous solution using green alga (Ulva lactuca) biomass. J. Hazard Mater. 152, 302–308 (2008).
Lodeiro, P., Barriada, J. L., Herrero, R. & de Sastre Vicente, M. E. The marine macroalga Cystoseira baccata as biosorbent for cadmium(II) and lead(II) removal: Kinetic and equilibrium studies. Environ. Pollut. 142, 264–273 (2006).
Luo, F., Liu, Y., Li, X., Xuan, Z. & Ma, J. Biosorption of lead ion by chemically-modified biomass of marine brown algae Laminaria japonica. Chemosphere 64, 1122–1127 (2006).
Yan, C., Li, G., Xue, P., Wei, Q. & Li, Q. Competitive effect of Cu(II) and Zn(II) on the biosorption of lead(II) by Myriophyllum spicatum. J. Hazard Mater. 179, 721–728 (2010).
Nadeem, R. et al. Physical and chemical modification of distillery sludge for Pb(II) biosorption. J. Hazard Mater. 150, 335–342 (2008).
Shrestha, B., Kour, J. & Ghimire, K. N. Adsorptive removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution with environmental friendly material—exhausted tea leaves. Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci. 6, 525–540 (2016).
Naik, B. R., Suresh, C., Kumar, N. S., Seshaiah, K. & Reddy, A. V. R. Biosorption of Pb(II) and Ni(II) ions by chemically modified Eclipta alba stem powder: Kinetics and equilibrium studies. Sep. Sci. Technol. 52(10), 1717–1732 (2017).
Regine, H. S., Vieira, F. & Volesky, B. (2000) A solution to pollution. Int. Microbiol. Biosorption 3, 17–24 (2016).
Xie, R., Jin, Y., Chen, Y. & Jiang, W. The importance of surface functional groups in the adsorption of copper onto walnut shell derived activated carbon. Water Sci. Technol. 76(11), 3022–3034. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst (2017).
Badsha, M. A. H., Khan, M., Wu, B., Kumar, A. & Lo, I. M. C. Role of surface functional groups of hydrogels in metal adsorption: From performance to mechanism. J. Hazard Mater. 408, 124463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124463 (2021).
Parvathi, K., Nagendran, R. & Nareshkumar, R. Lead biosorption onto waste beer yeast by-product, a means to decontaminate effluent generated from battery manufacturing industry. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 10(1), 92–105 (2007).
Yang, X. & Cui, X. Adsorption characteristics of Pb(II) on alkali treated tea residue. Water Resour. Ind. 3, 1–10 (2013).
Wang, S., Guo, W., Gao, F. & Yang, R. Characterization and Pb(II) removal potential of corn straw- and municipal sludge-derived biochars. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4(9), 170402 (2017).
Azizkhani, S. et al. Synthesis and characterisation of graphene oxide-silica-chitosan for eliminating the Pb(II) from aqueous solution. Polymers 12, 1922 (2020).
Chen, R. et al. Coadsorption behaviors and mechanisms of Pb(ii) and methylene blue onto a biodegradable multi-functional adsorbent with temperature-tunable selectivity. RSC Adv. 10, 35636 (2020).
Jiang, X. & Shen, D. Pb(II) ion adsorption by biomass-based carbonaceous fiber modified by the integrated oxidation and vulcanization. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 34, 2619–2630 (2017).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to INSF (Iran National Science Foundation) for supporting this research under Project No. 97014196.
Funding
This work was supported in part by Iran National Science Foundation under Grant 97014196.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.P. wrote the main manuscript text. Sampling and analysis of samples were performed by M.R. and A.M.M. The interpretation of the results was done by N.P.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rezaei, M., Pourang, N. & Moradi, A.M. Removal of lead from aqueous solutions using three biosorbents of aquatic origin with the emphasis on the affective factors. Sci Rep 12, 751 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04744-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04744-0
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Bio-removal of lead (II) ions under optimal condition by zinc chloride-impregnated activated carbon from brown alga
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (2024)
-
Silanized fiberglass modified by carbon dots as novel and impressive adsorbent for aqueous heavy metal ion removal
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2023)
-
Eco-friend shellfish powder of the mussel Brachidontes variabilis for uptake lead (II) ions
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (2023)
-
Effective removal of Pb(II) ions using piperazine-modified magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposite; optimization by response surface methodology
Scientific Reports (2022)