Abstract
We study irradiated two-dimensional insulating bilayer honeycomb ferromagnets and antiferromagnets coupled antiferromagnetically with a zero net magnetization. The former is realized in the recently synthesized bilayer honeycomb chromium triiodide CrI3. In both systems, we show that circularly-polarized electric field breaks time-reversal symmetry and induces a dynamical Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in each honeycomb layer. However, the resulting bilayer antiferromagnetic system still preserves a combination of time-reversal and space-inversion (\({\bf{P}}{\bf{T}}\)) symmetry. We show that the magnon topology of the bilayer antiferromagnetic system is characterized by a \({{\bf{Z}}}_{{\bf{2}}}\) Floquet topological invariant. Therefore, the system realizes a magnonic Floquet quantum spin Hall insulator with spin filtered magnon edge states. This leads to a non-vanishing Floquet magnon spin Nernst effect, whereas the Floquet magnon thermal Hall effect vanishes due to \({\bf{P}}{\bf{T}}\) symmetry. We study the rich \({{\bf{Z}}}_{{\bf{2}}}\) Floquet topological magnon phase diagram of the system as a function of the light amplitudes and polarizations. We further discuss the great impact of the results on future experimental realizations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In recent years, periodically driven solid-state materials have emerged as an alternative avenue to extend the search for topological quantum materials1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30. This mechanism involves the exposure of a topologically trivial quantum material to a time-periodic electric field. In this system, time-reversal symmetry of the Bloch bands is broken by circularly-polarized electric field by modifying the intrinsic properties of the material via light-matter interactions. This results in a Floquet Chern insulator such as in irradiated graphene1,5. The non-equilibrium topological systems are believed to give interesting properties that are not possible in the equilibrium systems.
In insulating magnets, the quantum theory of magnons dictates that magnons carry a spin magnetic dipole moment and an intrinsic spin of 1, which can be used for dissipationless information processing in the emerging field of magnon spintronics31,32. This implies that magnons can accumulate the Aharonov-Casher phase33,34,35,36,37,38 when exposed to a time-independent spatially-varying electric field resulting in magnonic Landau levels38 and chiral anomaly in Weyl magnons39,40. Remarkably, the magnon accumulated Aharonov-Casher phase has a strikingly different physics when the electric field is time-dependent and periodic as in electronic systems. In this case, the resulting irradiated insulating magnets can be investigated using the Floquet theory in a similar manner to irradiated metallic electronic systems. Unlike electronic systems, the magnetic Floquet physics can reshape the underlying spin Hamiltonian to stabilize magnetic phases and provides a promising avenue for inducing and tuning Floquet topological spin excitations41,42,43, with a direct implication of generating and manipulating ultrafast spin current using terahertz (THz) radiation44,45,46. In this respect, the concept of magnonic Floquet Chern insulator has emerged41,42,43, where circularly-polarized light induces a dynamical Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya (DM) interaction47,48,49 in a single-layer two-dimensional (2D) insulating honeycomb ferromagnet. This approach has also been generalized to engineer Floquet Weyl magnons50 in three-dimensional (3D) insulating honeycomb ferromagnets. Similar to electronic Floquet system, time-reversal symmetry is broken by circularly-polarized electric field and the Floquet topological system is characterized by the first Chern number. Therefore, the topological aspects of electronic and magnonic Floquet systems are essentially the same and they originate from the same oscillating time-periodic electric field. To make this similarity obvious, we note that in the magnonic Floquet topological systems, the intensity of light is characterized by the dimensionless quantity41
where Ei (\(i=x,y\)) are the amplitudes of the electric field, g is the Landé g-factor, μB is the Bohr magneton, a is the lattice constant, ħ and c are the reduced Plank’s constant and the speed of light respectively. The dimensionless quantity in Eq. (1) should be compared to that of electronic Floquet topological systems1,2,5
where e is the electron charge and \(\omega \) is the angular frequency of light. Thus, for the irradiated magnetic insulators we can identify the spin magnetic dipole moment carried by magnon as
Therefore, we can see that for a typical light wavelength λ of order 10−8m, the spin magnetic dipole moment gμB carried by magnon in the irradiated magnetic insulators is comparable to the electron charge e. This shows the similarity between the electronic and the magnonic Floquet topological systems.
Recently, the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) characterization of topological magnon bands in the equilibrium time-independent insulating antiferromagnets has garnered considerable attention51,52,53,54,55,56. In particular, for the 2D insulating bilayer honeycomb antiferromagnets with a DM interaction47,48,49 the system preserves time-reversal and space-inversion (\({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\)) symmetry and realizes the magnonic analog of \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) topological insulator57,58,59. Unfortunately, most 2D insulating honeycomb antiferromagnets do not have the unique form of the required DM interaction47. In fact, the absence of this unique DM interaction in most insulating honeycomb antiferromagnets has prevented a discernible experimental observation of the magnon spin Nernst voltage in MnPS360. One possible mechanism to induce the unique form of the required DM interaction in 2D insulating honeycomb antiferromagnets is through photo-irradiation with a circularly-polarized electric field41.
In this report, we propose a \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) magnonic Floquet quantum spin Hall insulator in bilayer collinear antiferromagnets with \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry. Specifically, we study irradiated 2D insulating bilayer honeycomb ferromagnets and antiferromagnets coupled antiferromagnetically with a zero net magnetization, where the former is realized in bilayer CrI361,62,63. Our theoretical formalism is based on the Floquet theory, spin-wave theory, and quantum field theory. In both honeycomb bilayer systems, we show that circularly-polarized electric field induces a dynamical DM interaction in each honeycomb layer, but the bilayer antiferromagnetic system preserves \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry, hence the resulting magnon topology is characterized by a \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant quantity. We obtain the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological magnon phase diagram and identify the regimes where the Floquet magnon spin Nernst coefficient changes sign. We also show that both systems exhibit Floquet spin-filtered magnon edge states, where Floquet magnon with opposite spin propagates in opposite directions. Our results provide a powerful mechanism for manipulating the intrinsic properties of 2D insulating honeycomb antiferromagnetic materials such as bilayer CrI3, and could pave the way for studying new interesting features in 2D insulating antiferromagnets such as photo-magnonics64, magnon spintronics31,32, and ultrafast optical control of magnetic spin currents37,44,45,46.
Results
Bilayer Heisenberg spin model
We consider the Heisenberg spin model for 2D insulating bilayer honeycomb ferromagnets and antiferromagnets coupled antiferromagnetically. The Hamiltonian is governed by
where \({\vec{S}}_{i}\) is the spin vector at site i and \(\ell \) labels the top (T) and bottom (B) layers. We will consider two different cases: (i) \(J < 0\), \({J}_{c} > 0\) (see Fig. 1(a)). (ii) \(J > 0\), \({J}_{c} > 0\) (see Fig. 1(b)). The intralyer coupling is ferromagnetic in case (i) and antiferromagnetic in case (ii). In both cases the net magnetization vanishes. We note that case (i) is manifested in the bilayer honeycomb magnet CrI361,62,63. There are four sublattices in the unit cell denoted by A1, B1, A2, B2. In both cases the interlayer exchange couples sites on the sublattices \({A}_{1}\leftrightarrow {A}_{2}\) and \({B}_{1}\leftrightarrow {B}_{2}\).
Bosonic Bogoliubov-de Gennes model
We will focus on the low-temperature regime, when the magnetic excitations of the spin Hamiltonian in Eq. (4) can be described by the Holstein Primakoff transformation65 (see Methods). The bosonic Hamiltonian in momentum space is given by
The bosonic Bogoliubov-de Gennes (BdG) Hamiltonian is given by
with \({{\mathscr{H}}}_{-}(\vec{k})={{\mathscr{H}}}_{+}^{\ast }(-\vec{k})\). Each block Hamiltonian is a 4 × 4 Hermitian matrix representing the \({S}_{z}=+\,1\) and the \({S}_{z}=-\,1\) spin sectors. Therefore, \( {\mathcal H} (\vec{k})\) is invariant under \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry given by \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}={\sigma }_{x}\otimes {\sigma }_{0}{\mathscr{K}}\), where \({\mathscr{K}}\) is complex conjugation, σi are Pauli matrices with an identity σ0. The \({S}_{z}=+\,1\) sector Hamiltonian in case (i) (\(J < 0\), \({J}_{c} > 0\)) is given by
with \({u}^{\dagger }(\vec{k})=({a}_{\vec{k}{A}_{1}}^{\dagger },{a}_{\vec{k}B1}^{\dagger },{a}_{-\vec{k}{A}_{2}},{a}_{-\vec{k}B2})\). The \({S}_{z}=+\,1\) sector Hamiltonian in case (ii) (\(J > 0\), \({J}_{c} > 0\)) is given by
with \({u}^{\dagger }(\vec{k})=({a}_{\overrightarrow{k}{A}_{1}}^{\dagger },{a}_{\overrightarrow{k}B2}^{\dagger },{a}_{-\overrightarrow{k}{B}_{1}},{a}_{-\overrightarrow{k}A2})\).
Here \({v}_{0}=3{v}_{J}+{v}_{{J}_{c}}\), \({v}_{J}=JS\), \({v}_{{J}_{c}}={J}_{c}S\) and \(f(\vec{k})={\sum }_{\ell }\,{e}^{i{k}_{\ell }}\) with \({k}_{\ell }=\vec{k}\cdot {\vec{a}}_{\ell }\). The primitive lattice vectors are \({\vec{a}}_{1}=a\sqrt{3}\hat{x}\), \({\vec{a}}_{2}=a(\sqrt{3}\hat{x}/2+3\hat{y}/2)\), \({\vec{a}}_{3}=0\). The nearest-neighbour vectors are \({\vec{\delta }}_{1,2}=a(\mp \sqrt{3}\hat{x}/2+\hat{y}/2)\), \({\vec{\delta }}_{3}=-\,a\hat{y}\). The Hamiltonian can be diagonalized by paraunitary operators. The magnon bands are doubly-degenerate due to \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry and they are given by
where \(\sigma =\pm \) for the layers and \(\eta =\pm \) for the sublattices. The magnon energy bands are depicted in Fig. 2(a and b) respectively. In both cases the linear Goldstone mode at the \({\boldsymbol{\Gamma }}\)-point signifies antiferromagnetic order. The doubly-degenerate antiferromagnetic Dirac magnons occur at the K-point in both cases.
Irradiated bilayer antiferromagnetic insulator
We will now present the analysis of irradiated 2D insulating antiferromagnets. Let us consider the effects of an oscillating electric field \(\vec{E}(\tau )\), irradiated perpendicular to the 2D insulating antiferromagnets. The consequence of irradiated insulating antiferromagnets is that hopping magnon with spin magnetic dipole moment gμB\(\hat{z}\) will accumulate the time-dependent version of the Aharanov-Casher phase33 given by (see Methods)
where \(\hat{s}={\rm{diag}}({\rm{I}},-\,{\rm{I}})\), \({\mu }_{m}=g{\mu }_{B}\)/\(\hslash {c}^{2}\), and \({\vec{r}}_{i}\) is the spin position at site i. We have used the notation \(\vec{{\rm{\Xi }}}(\tau )=\vec{E}(\tau )\times \hat{z}\) for brevity and \(\vec{E}(\tau )=-{{\rm{\partial }}}_{\tau }\vec{A}(\tau )\), where \(\vec{A}(\tau )\) is the time-dependent vector potential given by
where \({A}_{i}={E}_{i}\)/\(\omega \) (\(i=x,y\)) are the strength of the time-dependent vector potential and \(\varphi \) is the phase difference. For circularly-polarized electric field \(\varphi =\pi \)/2 and for linearly-polarized electric field \(\varphi =0\) or π. The corresponding time-dependent oscillating electric field is given by
The resulting time-dependent Hamiltonian is given by
where \({S}_{i}^{\pm (\ell )}={S}_{i,\ell }^{x}\pm i{S}_{i,\ell }^{y}\) denote the spin raising and lowering operators. Note that the interlayer coupling is not affected by light intensity. The spin current can be derived as
where \({j}_{ij,\ell }^{s}=-\,i\frac{J}{2}{e}^{i{{\rm{\Phi }}}_{ij,\ell }(\tau )}{S}_{i,\ell }^{-}{S}_{j,\ell }^{+}+{\rm{H}}.{\rm{c}}.\) Thus, the time-dependent Aharonov-Casher phase \({{\rm{\Phi }}}_{ij}(\tau )\) acts as a vector potential or gauge field to the spin current.
The Floquet theory is a powerful mechanism to study periodically driven quantum systems1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30. It enables one to transform a time-dependent periodic Hamiltonian into a static effective Hamiltonian governed by the Floquet Hamiltonian. In the off-resonant limit, when the photon energy ħ\(\omega \) is greater than the energy scale of the static system, the effective static Hamiltonian is given by5,6,7
where \({\rm{\Delta }}{ {\mathcal H} }_{eff}=[{ {\mathcal H} }_{1},{ {\mathcal H} }_{-1}]\)/\(\hslash \omega \) is the photon emission and absorption term. We use the discrete Fourier component of the time-dependent Hamiltonian \({ {\mathcal H} }_{n}=\frac{1}{T}\,{\int }_{0}^{T}\,d\tau {e}^{-in\omega \tau } {\mathcal H} (\tau )\) with period \(T=2\pi \)/\(\omega \). For circularly-polarized light \(\varphi =\pi \)/2 and \({E}_{x}={E}_{y}={E}_{0}\), we obtain
where \({ {\mathcal E} }_{0}=g{\mu }_{B}{E}_{0}a\)/\(\hslash {c}^{2}\) is the dimensionless Floquet parameter, \({\theta }_{ij,\ell }\) is the relative angle between \({\vec{r}}_{i}\) and \({\vec{r}}_{j}\), \({{\mathscr{J}}}_{n}(x)\) is the Bessel function of order \(n\in {\mathbb{Z}}\), and \({\delta }_{n,\ell }=1\) for \(n=\ell \) and zero otherwise. The zeroth-order term is given by
which is an XXZ Heisenberg spin model, where \(J{{\mathscr{J}}}_{0}({ {\mathcal E} }_{0}) < J\) for \({ {\mathcal E} }_{0}\ne 0\). The first-order term Δ\({ {\mathcal H} }_{eff}\) involves the commutation relation \([{S}_{\alpha }^{+}{S}_{\beta }^{-},{S}_{\rho }^{+}{S}_{\gamma }^{-}]\) = \(2({\delta }_{\beta \rho }{S}_{\beta }^{z}{S}_{\alpha }^{+}{S}_{\gamma }^{-}-{\delta }_{\alpha \gamma }{S}_{\alpha }^{z}{S}_{\rho }^{+}{S}_{\beta }^{-})\), which gives rise to a photoinduced DM interaction41 of the form
where \({\vec{S}}_{i,\ell }={S}_{i,\ell }^{z}\hat{z}\), \({D}_{F}=\sqrt{3}{[J{{\mathscr{J}}}_{1}({ {\mathcal E} }_{0})]}^{2}\)/\(\hslash \omega \), and \({\nu }_{jk}=\pm \,1\) for the two triangular plaquettes on the next-nearest neighbour bonds of the honeycomb lattice. Therefore, time-reversal symmetry of each honeycomb layer is broken by circularly-polarized light through a photoinduced DM interaction, but the bilayer antiferromagnetic system still preserves \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry. Thus, magnonic Floquet quantum spin Hall insulator can arise in irradiated bilayer collinear antiferromagnets. On the contrary, linearly-polarized light does not break time-reversal symmetry, thus Δ\({ {\mathcal H} }_{eff}=0\) for \(\varphi =0\).
Periodically-driven bosonic BdG model
In this section, we will study the magnon band structures for a general light polarization \(\varphi \in [0,2\pi ]\) and a general amplitude \({E}_{x}\ne {E}_{y}\). It is advantageous to periodically drive the bosonic BdG Hamiltonian in Eqs (7) and (8). In this case, the Aharanov-Casher phase enters the momentum space Hamiltonian through the time-dependent Peierls substitution \(\vec{k}\to \vec{k}-\hat{s}{\mu }_{m}\vec{{\rm{\Xi }}}(\tau )\). Using the analysis outline in Methods, we have obtained the Fourier decomposition of the single particle bosonic BdG Hamiltonian, which enters the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. For the \({S}_{z}=+\,1\) sector, the Fourier Hamiltonian for case (i) (i.e. \(J < 0\), \({J}_{c} > 0\)) is given by
and the Fourier Hamiltonian for case (ii) (i.e. \(J > 0\), \({J}_{c} > 0\)) is given by
where \(q\in {\mathbb{Z}}\) and \({\rho }_{q}(\vec{k})={\sum }_{\ell }\,{t}_{\ell ,q}{e}^{i{k}_{\ell }}\). The renormalized Heisenberg exchange interactions are given by
In the off-resonant limit \(\hslash \omega \gg J\), Jc, the system can be described by an effective time-independent Hamiltonian given by5,6,7
The lower block effective Hamiltonian is \({{\mathscr{H}}}_{-}^{eff}(\vec{k})={[{{\mathscr{H}}}_{+}^{eff}(-\vec{k})]}^{\ast }\). The commutator term in Eq. (24) contains terms proportional to \(\sin (\vec{k})\,\sin (\varphi )\), which is a mass term to the Dirac magnon. This corresponds to the momentum space of the dynamical DM interaction in Eq. (19) for \(\varphi =\pi \)/2, and it changes sign in the lower block Hamiltonian \({{\mathscr{H}}}_{-}^{eff}(\vec{k})\).
In Fig. 2(c and d) we have shown the plots of the Floquet magnon quasienergies for \(\varphi =\pi \)/2 in case (i) and case (ii) respectively. In both cases, we can see that the Goldstone modes are quadratically gapped out due to SU(2) breaking anisotropy generated by radiation. In addition, the antiferromagnetic Dirac magnon at equilibrium also becomes massive because circularly-polarized electric field induces a dynamical DM interaction in each honeycomb layer, which preserves the \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry of the bilayer antiferromagnetic system as shown in Eq. (19). Therefore, irradiated bilayer antiferromagnetic system is a concrete example of a magnonic Floquet quantum spin Hall insulator, unlike irradiated 2D graphene1,5 and 2D insulating ferromagnets41,42,50.
\({{\bf{Z}}}_{{\bf{2}}}\) Topological magnon phase transition
In this section, we will study the topological phase diagram and the topological invariant quantity of the irradiated bilayer antiferromagnetic system. Due to Sz conservation, we can define the block Chern number of the Floquet magnon bands as
where \({{\rm{\Omega }}}_{\sigma }(\vec{k},{{\mathscr{E}}}_{i},\varphi )\) are the Berry curvatures and \(\sigma =\pm \,1\) for \({S}_{z}=\pm \) sectors. We can then define the Hall nH and spin nS Chern numbers as
The \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) topological invariant is given by
We have computed the block Chern numbers of the system using the discretized Brillouin zone method66. We focus on the lower Floquet quasienergy magnon band. The upper Floquet magnon band can be obtained by flipping the signs. Due to \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry,
hence
for both case (i) and case (ii). The vanishing of \({n}_{H}({ {\mathcal E} }_{i},\varphi )\) implies that the magnon thermal Hall conductivity \({\kappa }_{xy}^{s}\)67,68,69,70 also vanishes in the Floquet bilayer antiferromagnetic system. However, the magnon spin Nernst conductivity51,71,72 is nonzero in the single-layer undriven system with DM interaction. Therefore, we will compute the Floquet magnon spin Nernst conductivity for the periodically driven system. We will focus on the regime where the Bose occupation function is close to thermal equilibrium. Hence, we can apply the same formula for the magnon spin Nernst coefficient in undriven system68,69,70,72, which we write as a function of the light parameters \({ {\mathcal E} }_{i}\) and \(\varphi \),
where \({c}_{1}(x)=(1+x)\,\mathrm{ln}(1+x)-x\,\mathrm{ln}\,x\) is the weight function and \(g({\epsilon }_{\overrightarrow{k},\alpha }^{\sigma })={[\exp ({\epsilon }_{\overrightarrow{k},\alpha }^{\sigma }/{k}_{B}T)-1]}^{-1}\) is the Bose occupation function close to thermal equilibrium and α labels the Floquet magnon bands. Indeed, the Floquet magnon spin Nernst coefficient is simply the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant weighed by the c1(x) function. Note that case (i) can be regarded as two copies of the Floquet Chern insulators41 with opposite spins, but case (ii) is not. Therefore, for case (ii) we have shown in Fig. 3 the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant magnon phase diagram of the system for the lower Floquet quasienergy magnon band. A similar phase diagram can be obtained for case (i). We can clearly see that in the three regimes where the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant changes sign, the Floquet spin Nernst coefficient also changes sign.
To further substantiate the existence of the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant, we show in Fig. 4 the plot of the Floquet magnon bands for a cylindrical strip geometry periodic along the y direction and infinite along the x direction. We can see that the Floquet magnon edge states traversing the bulk gap are spin filtered. In other words, Floquet magnon with opposite spin propagates in opposite directions. This results in a non-vanishing Floquet magnon spin Nernst coefficient with a \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant.
Conclusion
Using a combination of the Floquet theory, spin-wave theory, and quantum field theory, we have presented an exposition of \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) magnonic Floquet quantum spin Hall states in irradiated 2D insulating bilayer honeycomb ferromagnets and antiferrmagnets which are coupled antiferromagnetically. These systems have zero net magnetization and preserve \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry. In stark contrast to irradiated graphene1,5 and insulating collinear ferromagnets41,42,50, we showed that irradiation by circularly-polarized electric field breaks the time-reversal of each honeycomb layer through a photoinduced DM interaction, but \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry of the bilayer antiferromagnetic system is preserved. This results in Floquet spin filtered magnon edge states protected by the \({{\mathbb{Z}}}_{2}\) Floquet topological invariant of the bulk magnon band. The irradiated bilayer antiferromagnetic system exhibits a non-vanishing Floquet magnon spin Nernst effect, whereas the Floquet magnon thermal Hall effect vanishes due to \({\mathscr{P}}{\mathscr{T}}\) symmetry. As we mentioned previously, the bilayer honeycomb chromium iodide CrI361,62,63 is a promising candidate for investigating the current theoretical predictions. We note that topological magnons were recently reported in the ferromagnetic bulk structure of CrI373. Therefore, we believe that the current predicted results are pertinent to experiments and will remarkably impact future research in topological insulating antiferromagnets and their potential practical applications to magnon spintronics31,32 and photo-magnonics64.
Methods
Spin wave theory of bilayer honeycomb antiferromagnets
To derive the bosonic Hamiltonian in Eq. (6), we introduce the Holstein Primakoff bosons:
for up pointing spins, and
for down pointing spins.
Here \({a}_{i}^{(\ell )\dagger }({a}_{i}^{(\ell )})\) are the bosonic creation (annihilation) operators on the sublattices and \({S}_{j}^{\pm (\ell )}={S}_{j}^{x(\ell )}\pm i{S}_{j}^{y(\ell )}\) denote the spin raising and lowering operators. The bosonic tight-binding models are given by
for case (i) and
for case (ii). The Fourier transform of Eqs (33) and (34) gives the bosonic BdG Hamiltonian in Eq. (6).
Quantum field theory description of Aharonov-Casher phase
In the presence of an electromagnetic field, the low-energy charge-neutral Dirac magnon near the K-point of the BZ is governed by the 2 + 1 dimensional Dirac-Pauli Lagrangian74,75
where \({\varepsilon }_{0}\) accounts for the finite energy Dirac magnon and vD is the group velocity of the Dirac magnon, and \(\bar{\psi }={\psi }^{\dagger }{\gamma }^{0}\). The electromagnetic field tensor is Fμν and \({\sigma }^{\mu \nu }=\frac{i}{2}[{\gamma }^{\mu },{\gamma }^{\nu }]=i{\gamma }^{\mu }{\gamma }^{\nu },(\mu \ne \nu )\) with \({\gamma }^{\mu }=({\gamma }^{0},{\gamma }^{i})\).
To describe the antiferromagnetic Dirac magnon in the presence of an oscillating electric field, we follow the procedure in ref.76. In (2 + 1) dimensions, there are two inequivalent representations of the Dirac gamma matrices which generate different Clifford algebras. These two inequivalent representations of the Dirac matrices can be used to describe the \({S}_{z}=1\) and \({S}_{z}=-\,1\) sectors of the antiferromagnetic Dirac magnons. They obey the relation
where \({g}^{\mu \nu }={\rm{diag}}(1,-\,1,-\,1)\) is the Minkowski metric and \({\epsilon }^{\mu \nu \lambda }\) is an antisymmetric tensor in (2 + 1) dimensions.
with eigenvalues \(s=\pm \,1\). We choose the representation
such that \(\hat{s}\) is diagonal and it is given by
In this representation the interaction term transforms as
The Lagrangian can then be written as
where \({Q}_{\mu }=(1/2){\epsilon }_{\lambda \nu \mu }{F}^{\lambda \nu }\) is the effective vector potential dual of the field strength tensor. We consider an electromagnetic field with only an oscillating electric field vector \(\vec{E}(\tau )\). Hence, \({Q}_{\mu }={\rm{\Xi }}(\tau )=\vec{E}(\tau )\times z\). The Hamiltonian is given by
where \(\pi (x)=\frac{\partial {\mathcal L} }{\partial \dot{{\rm{\Psi }}}(x)}\) is the generalized momentum. The Hamiltonian is given by
where \(\vec{\alpha }={\gamma }^{0}\vec{\gamma }\). This is the effective form of the bosonic BdG Hamiltonian in Eq. (6) in the presence of an oscillating electric field vector.
Floquet-Bloch theory
The time-dependent bosonic BdG Hamiltonian \({\mathscr{H}}(\vec{k},\tau )\) can be studied by the Floquet-Bloch formalism. We can expand it as
where the Fourier components are given by \({{\mathscr{H}}}_{n}(\vec{k})=\frac{1}{T}\,{\int }_{0}^{T}\,{e}^{-in\omega \tau }{\mathscr{H}}(\vec{k},\tau )d\tau ={{\mathscr{H}}}_{-n}^{\dagger }(\vec{k}).\) The corresponding eigenvectors can be written as \({\psi }_{\alpha }(\vec{k},\tau )={e}^{-i{\epsilon }_{\alpha }(\vec{k})\tau }{u}_{\alpha }(\vec{k},\tau )\), where \({u}_{\alpha }(\vec{k},\tau )={u}_{\alpha }(\vec{k},\tau +T)={\sum }_{n}\,{e}^{in\omega \tau }{u}_{\alpha }^{n}(\vec{k})\) is the time-periodic Floquet-Bloch wave function of magnons and \({\epsilon }_{\alpha }(\vec{k})\) are the magnon quasi-energies. We define the Floquet operator as \({{\mathscr{H}}}^{F}(\vec{k},\tau )={\mathscr{H}}(\vec{k},\tau )-i{{\rm{\partial }}}_{\tau }\). The corresponding eigenvalue equation is of the form
Each block Hamiltonian in Eq. (6) obeys this equation.
References
Oka, T. & Aoki, H. Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 79, 081406 (2009).
Inoue, J.-I. & Tanaka, A. Photoinduced Transition between Conventional and Topological Insulators in Two-Dimensional Electronic Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 017401 (2010).
Lindner, N., Refael, G. & Gaslitski, V. Floquet topological insulator in semiconductor quantum wells. Nat. Phys. 7, 490 (2011).
Calvo, H. L. et al. Tuning laser-induced bandgaps in graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 232103 (2011).
Kitagawa, T. et al. Transport properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum Hall insulators without Landau levels. Phys. Rev. B 84, 235108 (2011).
Delplace, P., Gómez-León, Á. & Platero, G. Merging of Dirac points and Floquet topological transitions in ac-driven graphene. Phys. Rev. B 88, 245422 (2013).
Cayssol, J. et al. Floquet topological insulators. Physica Status Solidi (RRL) 7, 101 (2013).
Wang, Y. H. et al. Observation of Floquet-Bloch States on the Surface of a Topological Insulator. Science 342, 453 (2013).
Rechtsman, M. C. Photonic Floquet topological insulators. Nature 496, 196 (2013).
Ezawa, M. Photoinduced Topological Phase Transition and a Single Dirac-Cone State in Silicene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 026603 (2013).
Grushin, A. G., Gómez-León, Á. & Neupert, T. Floquet Fractional Chern Insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 156801 (2014).
Jotzu, G. et al. Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions. Nature 515, 237 (2014).
Zhai, X. & Jin, G. Photoinduced topological phase transition in epitaxial graphene. Phys. Rev. B 89, 235416 (2014).
Fläschner, N. et al. Experimental reconstruction of the Berry curvature in a Floquet Bloch band. Science 352, 1091 (2016).
Wang, R. et al. Floquet Weyl semimetal induced by off-resonant light. EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 105, 17004 (2014).
Goldman, N. & Dalibard, J. Periodically Driven Quantum Systems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields. Phys. Rev. X 4, 031027 (2014).
Bukov, M., D’Alessio, L. & Polkovnikov, A. Universal High-Frequency Behavior of Periodically Driven Systems: from Dynamical Stabilization to Floquet Engineering. Adv. Phys. 64, 139 (2015).
Eckardt, A. & Anisimovas, E. High-frequency approximation for periodically driven quantum systems from a Floquet-space perspective. New J. Phys. 17, 093039 (2015).
Ebihara, S., Fukushima, K. & Oka, T. Chiral pumping effect induced by rotating electric fields. Phys. Rev. B 93, 155107 (2016).
Chan, C.-K. et al. When Chiral Photons Meet Chiral Fermions: Photoinduced Anomalous Hall Effects in Weyl Semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 026805 (2016).
Yan, Z. & Wang, Z. Tunable Weyl Points in Periodically Driven Nodal Line Semimetals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 087402 (2016).
Zhang, X.-X., Ong, T. T. & Nagaosa, N. Theory of photoinduced Floquet Weyl semimetal phases. Phys. Rev. B 94, 235137 (2016).
Saha, K. Photoinduced Chern insulating states in semi-Dirac materials. Phys. Rev. B 94, 081103(R) (2016).
Hübener, H. et al. Creating stable Floquet-Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials. Nat. Commun. 8, 13940 (2017).
Stepanov, E. A., Dutreix, C. & Katsnelson, M. I. Dynamical and Reversible Control of Topological Spin Textures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 157201 (2017).
Plekhanov, K., Roux, G. & Le Hur, K. Floquet engineering of Haldane Chern insulators and chiral bosonic phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B 95, 045102 (2017).
Du, L., Zhou, X. & Fiete, G. A. Quadratic band touching points and flat bands in two-dimensional topological Floquet systems. Phys. Rev. B 95, 035136 (2017).
Wang, Y., Liu, Y. & Wang, B. Effects of light on quantum phases and topological properties of two-dimensional Metal-organic frameworks. Sci. Rep. 7, 41644 (2017).
Roy, R. & Harper, F. Periodic table for Floquet topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 96, 155118 (2017).
Yao, S., Yan, Z. & Wang, Z. Topological invariants of Floquet systems: General formulation, special properties, and Floquet topological defects. Phys. Rev. B 96, 195303 (2017).
Chumak, A. V. et al. Magnon spintronics. Nat. Phys. 11, 453 (2015).
Lenk, B. et al. The building blocks of magnonics. Phys. Rep. 507, 107 (2011).
Aharonov, Y. & Casher, A. Topological Quantum Effects for Neutral Particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 319 (1984).
Cao, Z., Yu, X. & Han, R. Quantum phase and persistent magnetic moment current and Aharonov-Casher effect in a s = 1/2 mesoscopic ferromagnetic ring. Phys. Rev. B. 56, 5077 (1997).
Meier, F. & Loss, D. Magnetization Transport and Quantized Spin Conductance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 167204 (2003).
Liu, T. & Vignale, G. Electric Control of Spin Currents and Spin-Wave Logic. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 247203 (2011).
Zhang, X. et al. Electric-field coupling to spin waves in a centrosymmetric ferrite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 037202 (2014).
Nakata, K., Klinovaja, J. & Loss, D. Magnonic quantum Hall effect and Wiedemann-Franz law. Phys. Rev. B. 95, 125429 (2017).
Ying, S. & Wang, X. R. Chiral anomaly of Weyl magnons in stacked honeycomb ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 96, 104437 (2017).
Ying, S., Wang, X. S. & Wang, X. R. Magnonic Weyl semimetal and chiral anomaly in pyrochlore ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 95, 224403 (2017).
Owerre, S. A. Floquet Topological Magnons. J. Phys. Commun. 1, 021002 (2017).
Owerre, S. A. Photoinduced Topological Phase Transitions in Topological Magnon Insulators. Sci. Rep. 8, 4431 (2018).
Kar, S. & Basu, B. Photo-induced Entanglement in a Magnonic Floquet Topological Insulator. Phys. Rev. B 98, 245119 (2018).
Mentink et al. Manipulating magnetism by ultrafast control of the exchange interaction. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 453001 (2017).
Schellekens, A. J. et al. Ultrafast spin-transfer torque driven by femtosecond pulsed-laser excitation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4333 (2014).
Walowski, J. & Münzenberg, M. Perspective: Ultrafast magnetism and THz spintronics. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 140901 (2016).
Owerre, S. A. A first theoretical realization of honeycomb topological magnon insulator. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 386001 (2016).
Dzyaloshinsky, I. A thermodynamic theory of “weak” ferromagnetism of antiferromagnetics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 4, 241 (1958).
Moriya, T. Anisotropic Superexchange Interaction and Weak Ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960).
Owerre, S. A. Floquet Weyl Magnons in Three-Dimensional Quantum Magnets. Sci. Rep. 8, 10098 (2018).
Kovalev, A. A. & Zyuzin, V. Magnon spin Nernst effect in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 93, 161106(R) (2016).
Nakata, K., Kim, S. E., Klinovaja, J. & Loss, D. Magnonic topological insulators in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B 96, 224414 (2017).
Lee, K. H., Chung, S. B., Park, K. & Park, J.-G. Magnonic quantum spin Hall state in the zigzag and stripe phases of the antiferromagnetic honeycomb lattice. Phys. Rev. B 97, 180401(R) (2018).
Mook, A., Göbel, B., Henk, J. & Mertig, I. Taking an electron-magnon duality shortcut from electron to magnon transport. Phys. Rev. B 97, 140401(R) (2018).
Kondo, H., Akagi, Y. & Katsura, H. Z2 Topological Invariant for Magnon Spin Hall Systems. Phys. Rev. B 99, 041110 (2019).
Joshi, D. G & Schnyder, A. P. Z2 topological quantum paramagnet on a honeycomb bilayer. arXiv:1809.06387 (2018).
Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005).
Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Z2 Topological Order and the Quantum Spin Hall Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005).
Bernevig, B. A., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S. C. Quantum Spin Hall Effect and Topological Phase Transition in HgTe Quantum Wells. Science 314, 1757 (2006).
Shiomi, Y., Takashima, R. & Saitoh, E. Signature of magnon Nernst effect in an antiferromagnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. B 96, 134425 (2017).
Huang, B. et al. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature (London) 546, 270 (2017).
Jiang, S., Shan, J. & Mak, K. F. Electric-field switching of two-dimensional van der Waals magnets. Nat. Mater. 17, 406 (2018).
Klein, D. R. et al. Probing magnetism in 2D van der Waals crystalline insulators via electron tunneling. Science 360, 1218 (2018).
Lenk, B. et al. Photo-magnonics. arXiv:1208.5383 (2012).
Holstein, T. & Primakoff, H. Field Dependence of the Intrinsic Domain Magnetization of a Ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940).
Fukui, T., Hatsugai, Y. & Suzuki, H. Chern Numbers in Discretized Brillouin Zone: Efficient Method of Computing (Spin) Hall Conductances. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1674 (2005).
Katsura, H., Nagaosa, N. & Lee, P. A. Theory of the Thermal Hall Effect in Quantum Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 066403 (2010).
Matsumoto, R. & Murakami, S. Theoretical Prediction of a Rotating Magnon Wave Packet in Ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 197202 (2011).
Matsumoto, R. & Murakami, S. Rotational motion of magnons and the thermal Hall effect. Phys. Rev. B 84, 184406 (2011).
Lee, H., Han, J. H. & Lee, P. A. Thermal Hall effect of spins in a paramagnet. Phys. Rev. B. 91, 125413 (2015).
Cheng, R., Okamoto, S. & Xiao, D. Spin Nernst Effect of Magnons in Collinear Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016).
Zhang, Y., Okamoto, S. & Xiao, D. Spin-Nernst effect in the paramagnetic regime of an antiferromagnetic insulator. Phys. Rev. B 98, 035424 (2018).
Chen, L. et al. Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet CrI3. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041028 (2018).
Hagen, C. R. Exact equivalence of spin-1/2 Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher effects. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2347 (1990).
Bjorken, J. D. & Drell, S. D. Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).
He., X.-G. & McKellar, B. H. J. Topological effects, dipole moments, and the dual current in 2 + 1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 64, 022102 (2001).
Acknowledgements
Research at Perimeter Institute is supported by the Government of Canada through Industry Canada and by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Research and Innovation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.A. Owerre conceived the idea, performed the calculations, discussed the results, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Owerre, S.A. Magnonic Floquet Quantum Spin Hall Insulator in Bilayer Collinear Antiferromagnets. Sci Rep 9, 7197 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43702-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43702-9
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Magnon magic angles and tunable Hall conductivity in 2D twisted ferromagnetic bilayers
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Valley-polarized domain wall magnons in 2D ferromagnetic bilayers
Scientific Reports (2020)