Abstract
Brucella species are Gram-negative, facultative intracellular pathogens responsible for a worldwide zoonosis. The envelope of Brucella exhibits unique characteristics that make these bacteria furtive pathogens and resistant to several host defence compounds. We have identified a Brucella suis gene (mapB) that appeared to be crucial for cell envelope integrity. Indeed, the typical resistance of Brucella to both lysozyme and the cationic lipopeptide polymyxin B was markedly reduced in a ∆mapB mutant. MapB turned out to represent a TamB orthologue. This last protein, together with TamA, a protein belonging to the Omp85 family, form a complex that has been proposed to participate in the translocation of autotransporter proteins across the outer membrane (OM). Accordingly, we observed that MapB is required for proper assembly of an autotransporter adhesin in the OM, as most of the autotransporter accumulated in the mutant cell periplasm. Both assessment of the relative amounts of other specific outer membrane proteins (OMPs) and a proteome approach indicated that the absence of MapB did not lead to an extensive alteration in OMP abundance, but to a reduction in the relative amounts of a protein subset, including proteins from the Omp25/31 family. Electron microscopy revealed that ∆mapB cells exhibit multiple anomalies in cell morphology, indicating that the absence of the TamB homologue in B. suis severely affects cell division. Finally, ∆mapB cells were impaired in macrophage infection and showed an attenuated virulence phenotype in the mouse model. Collectively, our results indicate that the role of B. suis TamB homologue is not restricted to participating in the translocation of autotransporters across the OM but that it is essential for OM stability and protein composition and that it is involved in cell envelope biogenesis, a process that is inherently coordinated with cell division.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bacteria of the genus Brucella are gram-negative bacteria, responsible for brucellosis, a disease characterized by chronic infections, abortions and infertility in animals, and chronic fatigue in humans1. Brucella invades and replicates in a variety of host cells such as macrophages, trophoblasts, dendritic and epithelial cells, within a characteristic compartment (“brucellosome”) derived from the endoplasmic reticulum2.
The bacterial cell envelope is the major point of interaction between intracellular pathogens and the host and, therefore, the molecules that are part of or are built within it have fundamental roles in the success of infection. The Brucella cell envelope, and in particular the outer membrane (OM), exhibits unique characteristics that make these pathogens resistant to most of the host bactericidal agents. Additionally, several evidences indicate that the Brucella envelope promotes evasion from innate immunity and is crucial to avoid intracellular destruction3. The Brucella cell envelope has been subject of numerous studies due to its central role in infection success. Brucella OM forms very stable bilayers4,5 as several Brucella outer membrane proteins (OMPs) maintain hydrophobic interactions with other OM components and/or contain hydrophilic domains that allow their binding to the peptidoglycan5,6. In fact, it was proposed that the interaction of the peptidoglycan with the OM results in a higher “OM stiffness” in Brucella than in other gram-negative bacteria4,7. Brucella contains an unconventional non-endotoxic lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that confers resistance to host antimicrobials5,8. Both the lipid A and the core of Brucella’s LPS exhibit a lower number of negative charged groups compared to most LPS from other bacteria2. Thus, the physicochemical characteristics of Brucella’s OM result in a low permeability (and thus higher resistance) to polycations such as polymyxin B and lysozyme, and a relatively high permeability to hydrophobic compounds9,10,11.
In addition to the OM general features, the cell envelope of bacterial pathogens usually displays adhesive molecules or structures that mediate the adhesion to the extracellular matrix and host cells, including proteins from the autotransporter families which are also in some cases required for full virulence in mice12,13,14. The C-terminal ends of monomeric autotransporters form a 14-stranded antiparallel β-barrel that is inserted into the OM and is essential for the functional (“passenger”) domain to go through the OM15. The trimeric autotransporters have a smaller C-terminal translocator domain that shares structural and functional similarities with that of the monomeric ones16. Several evidences indicate that the term “auto” actually does not contemplate the translocation mechanism of autotransporters since other proteins are required for their proper secretion. Indeed, the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) was found to be required for translocation of several autotransporters17. The BAM complex is composed of the essential BamA protein and accessory proteins. BamA belongs to the Omp85 protein superfamily that contains a C-terminal β-barrel domain inserted in the OM, and 5 POTRA (polypeptide-transport-associated) periplasmic domains at the N-terminal region, which were proposed to mediate the initial interaction of the BAM complex with substrate polypeptides18. Evidence was presented recently indicating that a new system called Translocation and Assembly Module (TAM) was necessary for the efficient translocation of the Ag43 and p1121 autotransporters in E. coli and Citrobacter rodentium, respectively19. The TAM system consists of TamA, another member of the Omp85 superfamily, and TamB, a large protein that is inserted in the inner membrane (IM) by an N-terminal non-cleavable signal peptide; the rest of TamB exhibits an extensive β-helical structure that is immersed in the periplasm19,20. The TAM system was not found to be essential in Gammaproteobacteria, but its inactivation affected the virulence and the host colonization of C. rodentium and Salmonella enterica19. It was recently suggested that a hydrophobic cavity with a β taco fold in TamB may serve as a chaperone to guide the hydrophobic β strands of TAM targets through the periplasm20. Proteins from the TamB family were found to be widely distributed in most of the gram-negative bacterial lineages, and surprisingly, even in numerous genera that do not harbor autotransporters21. This raises the question of which is the primary role of TamB in the biogenesis of the bacterial cell envelope. Interestingly, other studies suggest that the members of the TamB family from Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitan (a gammaproteobacterium), Deinococcus radiodurans (Deinococcus-Thermus phylum) and Borrelia burgdorferi (a spirochaete) may have a more general role in the OM assembly22,23,24,25.
While performed an in silico analysis to identify Brucella autotransporters the BR0049 gene from B. suis 1330 came out as a possible adhesin with a low similarity to autotransporters. Probably this was due to the abundance of β-helix strands that are predicted along almost the entire protein and also to a β-sheet structure found in the very C-terminus of BR0049 and its orthologues from other Alphaproteobacteria21. Further in silico studies and recent findings on the evolution of the novel TAM machinery21 indicated that BR0049 and its orthologues from other Alphaproteobacteria encode proteins that are phylogenetically related to members of the TamB family. Evidence presented in this work shows that BR0049 (a TamB homologue) plays roles that go beyond that of participating in autotransporter assembly. We propose that BR0049 is additionally involved in cell envelope biogenesis, in a process that is inherently coordinated with cellular division and that is crucial for cellular integrity.
Results
BR0049 is a distant homologue of TamB
The gene annotated as BR0049 in the B. suis 1330 genome encodes a predicted protein of 1515 amino acids. However, a careful alignment analysis of its upstream DNA region and that of its orthologues in other Brucella’s species showed that the start codon of the open reading frame might be located 192 bp upstream the annotated start codon. N-terminal signal sequence prediction (see below) further support this observation. To avoid confusion, we called the corrected ORF as BR0049*. This gene encodes a protein which has 1579 amino acids in length and is highly conserved among the different Brucella species (>99% aminoacid sequence identity). Outside Brucella spp., its closest homologues with an 80–84% sequence identity are the orthologues of the Ochrobactrum genus (another member of the Brucellaceae family). In other Alphaproteobacteria such as rhizobia, the homologues are similar in size and share 30–50% amino acid sequence identity. Database searches using the DELTA-BLAST program were able to detect phylogenetically related proteins in Gammaproteobacteria such as TamB from Escherichia coli and Citrobacter rodentium19, which shared 22% global sequence identity with BR0049. In line with these findings, it was proposed that BR0049* and its orthologues from other Alphaproteobacteria would also be part of the TAM system21.
Similar to TamB from Gammaproteobacteria, protein domain predictions showed that BR0049* contains a DUF490 conserved domain19 at the C-terminal region (amino acids 1241–1579) (Fig. 1A). In contrast, the rest of BR0049* diverges from TamB of gammaproteobacteria. BR0049* displays a second and incomplete DUF490 domain (amino acids 916–1088) but with less significance (E-value: 8.57e−05) (Fig. 1A), which is not found in Gammaproteobacteria TamB. An additional TamB protein feature was found in BR0049* as a β-sheet secondary structure is predicted by the Jpred 4 protein secondary structure server in most of the protein except for an α-helical small region of about 46 amino acids (1459–1505 amino acid region) (Fig. 1A), starting at the same relative position from the C-terminal end of TamB from E. coli19. These observations strongly suggest that the BR0049* protein represents a TamB orthologue although a significant portion of the N-terminal region diverges from the TamB proteins from gammaproteobacteria.
It was previously shown that TamB from E. coli and C. rodentium is inserted in the IM through a non-cleavable N-terminal signal sequence but most of the protein is thought to be immersed in the periplasm19,20,26. Analysis with the SignalP-4.1 algorithm predicted an N-terminal signal sequence at BR0049* positions 1–21. This sequence overlaps with a probable transmembrane region between positions 5–22 (THTMM 2.0). Therefore, similarly to TamB proteins, the N-terminal end of BR0049* could represent a non-cleavable signal sequence that mediates the insertion of the protein into the IM. Analysis with the Gneg-mPloc program support the hypothesis that BR0049* localizes in both the IM and the periplasm.
To determine the localization of BR0049*, a 3xFLAG tag was fused to the C-terminus of the protein and the presence of the BR0049*-3xFLAG protein in different subcellular fractions was detected with anti-FLAG antibodies. Western blot analysis of total cell extracts showed that BR0049*-3xFLAG is expressed along the exponential and early stationary growth phases, but diminishes at the late stationary phase (Fig. 1B). As an efficient separation of IM and OM has not yet been achieved in Brucella, BR0049*-tagged localization was first analyzed in total membranes and in the cytosol fractions. Western blot analysis clearly indicated that BR0049*-3xFLAG localized to the membrane fraction (Fig. 1C). In order to discriminate between the IM and OM, a protoplast fraction (Pr) separated from a OM plus periplasm enriched fraction (OM + Pe) was obtained by treatment with Zwittergent 3–16 followed by centrifugation27. Immunodetection with anti-FLAG antibodies showed that the tagged protein localized to the protoplast fraction (Fig. 1C), confirming that BR0049* is associated with the cell IM.
A gene encoding a TamA homologue (BR0048) is found immediately upstream the BR0049* gene (Fig. 1D). TamA represents the OM component of the TAM system21 and belongs to the Omp85/TpsB superfamily, whose members were mainly implicated in β-barrel assembly machinery18. TamA is inserted in the OM through its C-terminal Bac_surface_Ag domain that exhibits a β-barrel structure, followed in the periplasmic space by a classical POTRA domain and two divergent POTRA domains26. A classical POTRA domain (P3) located adjacent to the C-terminal Bac-surface-Ag domain was identified between BR0048 protein amino acids 233–307 (Fig. 1A). In addition, alignment and secondary structure analyses suggest the presence of two other divergent POTRA-like domains (P1 and P2) (Fig. 1A).
It was proposed that tamA and tamB genes are co-transcribed in an operon19. Hence, in order to verify if this organization is conserved in B. suis, RT-PCR analysis was conducted using total B. suis RNA and specific primers designed to amplify a genomic region overlapping the 3′end of BR0048 and the 5′end of BR0049. A PCR product of the expected size was obtained, showing that BR0048 and BR0049 genes form an operon (Fig. 1D).
In conclusion, the predicted protein domain organization, subcellular localization and co-transcriptional analyses strongly suggest that BR0048 and BR0049* proteins conform the Brucella spp. TAM system (Fig. 1E).
A BR0049* mutant shows an altered cell surface
In order to perform functional studies on the BR0049* protein, we generated a clean deletion mutant of the BR0049* gene by double homologous recombination. As several assays showed that the BR0049* null mutant displayed an altered cell surface (see below) the gene-encoded protein was referred as MapB for membrane altering protein. First, we found that a 10 min preincubation in 0.1% Triton X-100 sharply decreased cell viability of mutant bacteria but not that of wild type cells. Complementation of the mutant with the mapB gene cloned into a pBBR1MCS1 plasmid (∆mapB pBBRmapB) restored resistance to Triton X-100 (Fig. 2A), thus providing phenotypic confirmation of mapB deletion. To note, no significant differences in bacterial growth in liquid rich medium were found between the wild type, the ∆mapB mutant and the complemented strains (Supplementary Fig. S1). Besides, the ∆mapB mutant and the wild type strain did not show statistically significant differences in the sensitivity to different concentrations of H2O2, 0.67 mM EDTA, 0.01% SDS, 0.1% DOC, porcine serum or acidic pH (4.5) (Supplementary Fig. S1).
Brucella is particularly resistant to cationic peptides5,9. The ∆mapB mutant strain exhibited from 5 to 14-fold higher sensitivity to different concentrations of the cationic lipopeptide polymyxin B than the wild type strain, while the complementing plasmid restored the wild type phenotype (Fig. 2B). Brucella species are also relatively resistant to the lytic effect of lysozyme9. Remarkably, while the wild-type strain showed a sustained optical density (OD600) over time in the presence of lysozyme, the turbidity of the ΔmapB culture decreased up to 26% of the initial value after 4 min of incubation due to cell lysis, and the complementing plasmid restored the wild type phenotype (Fig. 2C).
These observations showed that the integrity and typical resistance of the Brucella cell envelope to polymyxin B and lysozyme depend to a high extent on MapB, suggesting that the TamB homologue plays in B. suis a critical role in cell envelope homeostasis.
mapB deletion did not greatly affect the LPS structure and the total fatty acid composition
An increased sensitivity of Brucella to polymyxin B has been previously associated to loss of the LPS O-antigen9,28. This was not the case for the ΔmapB mutants because, firstly, the same as wild type cells, they did not agglutinate in the presence of 0.1% w/v acriflavine. On the contrary, Brucella ovis, a rough control that lacks the O-antigen, showed agglutination in the presence of the reagent (data not shown). Secondly, we observed that both the mutant and the wild-type strains exhibited a similar degree of reactivity towards a fluorescein (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-Brucella S (smooth) antibody (data not shown). These observations suggest that the O-polysaccharide still remained associated to the cell surface in the ΔmapB mutant.
Rough Brucella cells devoid of the O-antigen retain more crystal violet compared to their parental strains29; B. ovis, a naturally rough species, retains high amounts of the dye. As expected, we did not observe an increased staining of the ΔmapB colonies on Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) plates in the presence of crystal violet compared to the wild type and complemented strains. On the contrary, while wild type colonies showed an evident violet coloration in the presence of crystal violet, mutant colonies hardly retained the dye. The complementing pBBRmapB plasmid restored the phenotype (Fig. 2D). Hence, even though this observation further supports that the ΔmapB mutant is not a rough strain, the mutant colony phenotype on crystal violet is consistent with the idea that the ΔmapB mutant displays an altered cell envelope.
In order to evaluate whether the ΔmapB phenotypes could be attributed to LPS structural differences other than the complete loss of O-antigen, LPSs obtained by SDS-proteinase K treatment were analyzed by silver staining and Western blot. With the exception of some extra bands or bands with stronger signal in the mutant profile, no major differences between the LPS patterns of wild type, mutant and complemented strains were observed by Silver staining (Supplementary Fig. S2). Further analyses by Western blot using anti-O-antigen and anti-R (rough)-LPS monoclonal antibodies, indicated that both the S(smooth)-LPS and R-LPS profiles did not undergo major changes, further confirming that ΔmapB is a smooth strain (Supplementary Fig. S2). Again, some extra or stronger bands were observed in the mutant profile (indicated by arrows). To note, we consistently observed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining that the LPS from the ΔmapB mutant swept along more proteins than that of the wild-type strain (data not shown), suggesting that the extra- or more abundant bands observed in the mutant pattern could be related to this behavior. Association of the LPS from the mutant strain with different proteins could not account for this effect since a similar protein composition was detected by proteomics in both LPS wild type and mutant preparations (data not shown). In fact, 6 members of the Omp25/31 group that were shown to interact with the peptidoglycan7, and two other putative OMPs (BR1469 and BRA0921) were associated with the LPS in both the wild type and ΔmapB mutant (data not shown). A possible explanation for these observations is that the absence of MapB might result in a weaker interaction of certain OMPs with other envelope structures such as the peptidoglycan or, alternatively, to a stronger OMP interaction with the LPS itself30. Interestingly, using LPS preparations obtained by hot-phenol extraction, both the extra bands or bands with stronger signals were not observed in the silver staining ΔmapB pattern (Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting that indeed the subtle differences observed in the profile of crude mutant LPS preparations could be due to a differential interaction of OMPs with envelope structures.
In conclusion, although subtle changes in the LPS structure cannot be ruled out, all our observations indicate that it is unlikely that the cause of the increased sensitivity of the ∆mapB mutant to polymyxin B was the lack of the O-antigen or major alterations in the LPS structure.
The cell surface phenotypes of ΔmapB, in particular the increased sensitivity to Triton X-100, could be due to changes in the membrane fatty acid composition. These modifications could make the cell more permeable and, therefore, more susceptible to non-ionic detergents. To explore this possibility, membrane fatty acid composition from total lipids was analyzed. Supplementary Table S1 shows no significant differences in the fatty acid amounts and composition of the wild type, mutant and complemented strains. To note, 18:1 and 19:0 cyc should be considered together since, depending on the age of the culture, 18:1 is a direct precursor of 19:0 cyc31. This observation shows that the greater sensitivity of ΔmapB to Triton X-100, lysozyme and polymyxin B was not due to major changes in membrane fatty acid composition.
Role of MapB in the insertion of proteins into the OM
As mentioned above, TamB proteins from E. coli and C. rodentium were shown to be required for efficient translocation of autotransporters into the OM19. To assess whether a similar function could also be ascribed to MapB, we analyzed the presence of the B. suis monomeric autotransporter adhesin BR2013 (BmaB) (Bialer et al., unpublished data) in whole cell extracts and in different subcellular fractions of wild-type and ΔmapB strains. A plasmid construct harboring an N-terminal 3xFLAG translation fusion of BmaB at the signal peptide cleavage site (Fig. 3A) was generated and the presence of the tagged protein was analyzed by Western blot using anti-FLAG antibodies. As expected, the presence of a protein band with the predicted molecular weight of 164 kDa as well as two other associated protein bands were observed in wild-type whole cell extracts (Fig. 3A). Intriguingly, increased levels of 3xFLAG-BmaB were consistently observed in whole cell extracts of the ΔmapB mutant (Fig. 3A). We then determined the subcellular distribution of the tagged autotransporter in both cellular backgrounds. Given the difficulty in separating the OM from the IM in Brucella cells, total membranes (M) and soluble (Cy + Pe, cytoplasm plus periplasm) fractions were analyzed by Western blot using the anti-FLAG antibodies (Fig. 3B). As expected, a major 164 kDa band was mainly observed in total membranes in the wild type background. In contrast, although a low amount of the entire protein was recovered in the ΔmapB total membrane fraction, high levels of it were associated with the soluble fraction (Cy + Pe) as an 85 kDa fragment. Proteolytic breakdown was not prevented by the addition of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Fig. 3B).
To further study the autotransporter localization in both genetic contexts, the protoplasts (Pr) and the OM-periplasm (OM + Pe) enriched fractions obtained by Zwittergent 3–16 treatment (see Materials and Methods) were also analyzed by Western blot. As expected, in the wild-type strain the 3xFLAG-BmaB protein localized to the OM + Pe fraction, though in this case mainly as a protein fragment of approximately 85 kDa, strongly suggesting that the autotransporter is particularly sensitive to the fractioning procedure. Similarly, in the ΔmapB mutant a protein fragment of the same molecular weight (85 kDa) was also detected in the OM + Pe fraction, though in higher amounts than in the wild-type strain (Fig. 3B). Therefore, taking together the protein patterns of all subcellular fractions obtained by both fractioning methods, it may be concluded that in the wild type background BmaB is located in the OM. On the other hand, although some autotransporter molecules seemed to reach the OM in the ∆mapB mutant, comparison of protein amounts in the different protein fractions indicated that most of BmaB was recovered in the periplasm.
The altered cell envelope homeostasis of ΔmapB could hardly be explained by a defect in the efficiency of OM insertion of proteins with adhesin activity. Thus, a plausible hypothesis was that MapB is involved in the OM translocation of either a broad range of substrates or, alternatively, of a specific subset of proteins, some of which would be important for OM assembly. To evaluate these alternatives, the presence of a variety of different OMPs in total membranes of the wild type, ΔmapB and the complemented strains was analysed by Western blot using specific antibodies. We assumed that OMPs not efficiently translocated into the mutant OM would be underrepresented in the samples. The following OMPs were chosen for this analysis: Omp1 (BamA)32, Omp2b (an oligomeric porin with β-barrel structure)6,33, Omp31 and Omp25 (group 3 of Brucella OMPs, with β-structure, associated with the peptidoglycan and exposed on the surface)5,6,34 and Omp19, Omp16 and Omp10 (all lipoproteins with a hydrophilic domain and possible binding to the peptidoglycan)5,35. Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver staining profiles of total membranes from the wild type, the ∆mapB mutant and complemented strains showed no major differences (Fig. 3C), indicating that the mutant did not undergo extensive changes in the OMP composition. As to the Western blot, no significant differences were found between the wild type and the mutant in the protein levels of Omp1 (BamA), the Omp2b porin or the Omp19, Omp16 and Omp10 lipoproteins (Fig. 3D).
Analysis of group 3 of OMPs using anti-Omp25 or anti-Omp31 antibodies did not show discrete bands but a smearing across the lanes in both the wild type and the mutant membrane preparations (Supplementary Fig. S3). Interestingly, membrane treatment with 5 mg/ml lysozyme, followed by Western blot analysis resulted in the observation of discrete bands in both genetic backgrounds (Fig. 3D). This is in agreement with the strong peptidoglycan association that has been previously proposed for this group of OMPs7. It is noteworthy that antibodies used probably recognize more than one member of the Omp25/31 protein family34,36,37. A 50% decrease in levels of membrane-associated Omp25 and Omp31 proteins was observed in the ∆mapB mutant in comparison with wild type cells. The complemented strain showed restored protein levels (Fig. 3D). In line with this observation, it was previously proposed that a tight balance of the OMPs from group 3 is essential for Brucella OM integrity5,38. Reduction in Omp25 and Omp31 amounts was not due to a decrease in protein expression since Western blot analysis of whole cell extracts did not show differences in those OMP amounts between the wild type and mutant backgrounds (Supplementary Fig. S3).
For a more global analysis, total membrane proteins from the wild type, ΔmapB, and complemented strains were analyzed in triplicate by LC-MS/MS using the Orbitrap technology. Label-free quantification analysis showed a similar abundance of most of detected proteins in the three strains, further indicating that the absence of MapB did not induce a general decrease (or change) in the relative amounts of membrane proteins. It should be stressed that our analysis was restricted to proteins detected in all three replicates of both strains. Furthermore, in no case proteins detected in the three wild type cell replicas appeared to be absent from one or more of the three mutant ones. In line with Western blot studies, similar abundance of Omp1 (BamA), of the Omp2b porin and of the Omp16 lipoprotein was observed in the wild type and the mutant cells (Table 1). Furthermore, several other OMPs, including proteins with β-barrel structure such as BepC39 and proteins from group 3 of OMPs (Omp25 and Omp25b) were detected and showed similar abundances in both strains (Table 1).
In agreement with Western blot results shown in Fig. 3D, abundance of both Omp31 members (BRA0423 and BR1622)34,37 were diminished in the mutant. In addition, the levels of Omp25c (BR0119)37 were also reduced compared to the wild type cells. This may account for the decrease in the signal observed by Western blot using anti-Omp25 antibodies (Fig. 3D); however, we cannot rule out the contribution of Omp25d to this result since the abundance of this protein was under the good confidence detection limit.
The abundance of four proteins with a predicted subcellular localization other than the OM was also decreased in ΔmapB in comparison with the wild-type and complemented strains (Supplementary Table S2). The levels of two IM proteins were reduced in the mutant: an oligopeptide ABC transporter related to β-lactam resistance (BRA0535) and a putative lipoprotein anchoring transpeptidase (BR0564) from the ErfK/SrfK family40. The homologue of the latter in Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Atu0845) was proposed to play a major role in peptidoglycan crosslinking in the growing pole during the cell division process41. In addition, the levels of BR2114 a protein that according to the Gneg-mPLoc server has a predicted periplasmic localization and that harbors a DUF2852 domain of unknown function, were reduced in the mutant. Finally, the abundance of a cytoplasmic protein from the DegT/DnrJ/EryC1/StrS family (BR1601), whose members were involved in 4-amino-6-deoxy-monosaccharide D-perosamine synthesis, was decreased in ΔmapB42 (Supplementary Table S2).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that the mutant phenotypes are not due to a generalized change in OMP abundance. However, our observations strongly suggest that MapB is required for the correct localization or stability in the OM of a subset of OMPs, including the BmaB autotransporter and members of group 3 of OMPs (Omp25/31 family). The role of MapB in OM insertion of additional OMPs cannot be completely ruled out since the comparative analysis between the wild type and the mutant membrane proteomes was carried out under very stringent conditions. The relative reduction of other proteins that, according to their amino acid sequences cannot be predicted to localize to the OM, might be related to indirect effects. For instance, the presence of some of those proteins in their final destinations could be dependent on their interaction with OMPs whose stability in the OM is MapB dependent.
The absence of MapB leads to aberrant cellular division
It has been proposed that the TAM system works through the interaction between the periplasmic domains of TamB IM and TamA OM proteins. This topology is itself suggestive of a function for the TAM complex related with cell envelope biogenesis. In addition, the low stability of the ∆mapB cell envelope under different stress conditions suggests that MapB is crucial for cell envelope homeostasis. Therefore, to evaluate changes in the ΔmapB surface and cell morphology we performed Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) analyses of stationary-phase bacteria. Surprisingly, SEM analysis showed that, unlike the typical small coccobacillus morphology of Brucella, mapB deletion led to an increase in cell size, the formation of ectopic septa, several “Y shaped” bacteria, and other aberrant cell morphologies (Fig. 4A). These observations strongly suggest that MapB absence causes defects in cell division. The complemented strain showed a high proportion of cells looking like the wild-type strain although some bacteria showed atypical shapes, thus indicating that this last phenotype was not completely restored. TEM analysis showed that in a low but significant number of cells the ΔmapB OM was slightly more separated from the IM with focal looser appearance than in the wild-type strain. The complementing plasmid restored this last phenotype (Fig. 4B).
B. abortus and B. melitensis like other bacteria release blebs or outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) to the extracellular medium43,44. OMVs are produced in Gram-negative bacteria by OM bulging carrying periplasmic soluble content. It was proposed that while bacteria grow and recycles their OMs, cell walls tends to release more OMVs mostly at the division septa. Besides, it is known that mutants in OMPs linked to the peptidoglycan layer, such as OmpA, Lpp, TolB and Pal in other bacterial genera increase the blebbing process. Thus, we wondered whether the multiple ectopic septa and the decrease in the abundance of OMPs that interact with the peptidoglycan observed in ΔmapB might lead to OMV overproduction and/or augmented protein content associated with these vesicles. To test this suggestion, wild type and mutant cells were grown to the exponential phase and OMV fractions that were obtained by ultracentrifugation of cell-free supernatants were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Very few proteins were detected in the wild type OMV fraction, suggesting a low production of OMVs by B. suis 1330 under the culture conditions employed. On the other hand, the OMV fraction recovered from the ΔmapB strain revealed a high number of proteins (around 40). Almost 60% of detected proteins corresponded to OMPs and periplasmic proteins, including multiple members of the Omp25/Omp31 protein family, Omp2b, BamA, TolB and periplasmic components of ABC transporters (Supplementary Table S3). Thus, the mapB mutant tends to release higher amounts of OMV-associated proteins than the wild type cell. Although it cannot be discarded that part of the material recovered comes from detachment of the OM and leakage of periplasmic content, the phenotype observed further confirmed the fragility of ΔmapB cell envelope and suggests that the blebbing process is somehow altered or deregulated in the mutant.
It may be concluded that lack of MapB leads to severe defects in the cell division process. In addition, it seems that the absence of MapB affects the OM association with the cell wall, thus leading to higher levels of OMV-associated proteins.
MapB is required for initial survival in macrophages and virulence in the mouse model
To evaluate if MapB plays a role in the virulence process, we studied the internalization and intracellular replication of the wild type, the complemented and the ΔmapB mutant strains in J774.1 murine macrophages. As shown in Fig. 5A, deletion of mapB significantly affected the intracellular CFUs, particularly at early stages (30 min to 8 h post infection; p.i.). However, at later stages, bacteria that managed to survive replicated at rates similar to those of wild type cells. These results suggest that ΔmapB exhibits a defect in internalization and/or survival during the first stages of macrophage infection but not at later stages.
To further examine the role of MapB in the infection process, we performed in vivo studies using the mouse model. To this end, groups of five mice per strain were infected by intragastric inoculation45 and splenic infection was evaluated at 7, 15 and 45 days p.i. At 7 days p.i. there were no significant differences between the wild type, the mutant and complemented strains. However, at 15 and 45 days p.i. the splenic infection by ∆mapB cells was significantly reduced, by 0.4 log and 1.45 log respectively, compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. 5B). In all cases, the complemented strain harboring the pBBR1mapB plasmid showed a splenic CFU count similar to those of wild type cells. These results indicate, therefore, that MapB is required for full virulence of B. suis in mice infected through the oral route.
Discussion
The role(s) of TamB family proteins in the bacterial physiology is poorly understood. In this work we provide information on the role MapB, the B. suis TamB homologue, in cell envelope biogenesis. The model for this role arising from our observations is depicted in Fig. 6 and will be further discussed below. Our initial observation on the ΔmapB mutant marked sensitivity to Triton X-100 suggested that MapB could have a fundamental role in envelope stability. To better understand the impact of MapB absence on cell surface features, the ΔmapB mutant was exposed to different stress conditions. We found that bacteria lacking MapB lost the typical brucellae resistance of to both polymyxin B and lysozyme5,9, thus indicating that the cell surface characteristics that allow Brucella to overcome the deleterious effects of those agents were MapB dependent. Further evidence showed that ΔmapB phenotypes were not attributable to evident changes in LPS structure, which is considered a key surface structure that makes Brucella resistant to several host antimicrobials, including polymyxin B9,46.
Hence, the question was which is the process mediated by MapB (and its putative partner BR0048), whose deficiency produces profound alterations in cell envelope stability. Selkrig and co-workers proposed that TAM is involved in the translocation and assembly of certain proteins, specifically proteins from the autotransporter family19. We indeed found that ΔmapB cells, instead of targeting the BmaB autotransporter to the OM tend to accumulate BmaB in the periplasm (Fig. 6B). However, the ΔmapB phenotypes could not be simply explained by a defect in autotransporter translocation since the functions of this protein family in Brucella are restricted to bacterial adhesion to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and host cells12,13,14,47 (Bialer et al., unpublished). Besides, neither single mutants nor some double mutants of B. suis autotransporter genes showed altered Triton X-100 or lysozyme tolerance (data not shown), strongly suggesting that MapB could not be involved solely in autotransporter translocation efficiency. Therefore, a reasonable hypothesis was that the Brucella TamB homologue could be involved in the translocation of a larger subset of OMPs, some of which would be important for OM homeostasis. Western blot analysis using specific antibodies against several OMPs and a membrane proteome approach showed that the relative abundance of OMPs from the Omp25/31 family was impaired in the MapB-deficient mutant. Interestingly, it has been previously proposed that a tight balance of proteins from this family is necessary for OM stability, and evidence was reported showing that Omp25/31 proteins strongly interact with both the LPS and the peptidoglycan, thus allowing a higher OM and envelope stiffness5,38. Therefore, changes observed in the relative abundance of proteins of the Omp25/31 family could account, at least in part, for the OM instability of MapB-deficient cells (Fig. 6B).
The ΔmapB mutant is viable under normal culture conditions but the observation of aberrant cell morphologies indicate that cell division, cell elongation or both are severely altered in the mutant. This implies that the cell envelope biogenesis process mediated by TAM in Brucella must be coordinated with cell division. Supporting this hypothesis, a recent analysis by chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) showed that the B. abortus promoter of the BR0048 and mapB orthologues is one of the multiple targets of CtrA, a global regulator of cell division48 (Fig. 6A). Interestingly, it was shown that, in addition to recognizing promoters of genes involved in cell cycle progression, CtrA binds promoters of genes encoding proteins that participate in OM biogenesis. A conditional ctrA mutant displayed elongated and branched morphologies. These same morphologies were also detectable inside HeLa cells and bacteria with abnormal shapes were able to traffic to the endoplasmic reticulum niche in host cells. Of note, CtrA depletion altered OM composition, in particular Omp25. Thus, some of the phenotypes of the CtrA-depleted cells are reminiscent to those observed in the ∆mapB mutant, including the ability to reach the replication niche since, although the ΔmapB mutant presented cell division defects, it was able to replicate at later infection stages within host cells (see below). An attractive hypothesis is that MapB somehow temporarily assists CtrA in cell cycle regulation. Further studies will be necessary to confirm the regulation of the BR0048-mapB operon by CtrA and the interplay between this last protein and MapB during the cell cycle.
Other few proteins with a predicted subcellular localization other than OM were reduced in the ΔmapB strain. The decrease in the abundance of those proteins might be due to indirect effects of the mapB mutation on gene expression or on protein stability. The observation that a putative L,D-transpeptidase of B. suis (BR0564) was diminished in the mutant is interesting since this protein is related to peptidoglycan crosslinking. The L,D-transpeptidases catalyze the 3,3-cross-links between two m-Dap residues thus allowing the linkage of m-Dap residues with the peptidoglycan mesh (Fig. 6A). It has been reported that the A. tumefaciens orthologue (Atu0845) was crucial for polar growth during cell division41. Besides, the B. abortus homologue (BAB1_0589), and other five genes coding for L, D transpeptidases, are targets of the cell cycle regulator CtrA (see above)48. Therefore, decrease in the BR0564 abundance could contribute to the looser appearance of the OM (Fig. 4). It will be interesting to analyze the crosslinking grade of muropeptides in the ΔmapB cell wall.
Numerous reports have shown that Gram-negative bacteria, including Brucella spp., spontaneously release OMVs during normal growth and different biological roles for those vesicles have been proposed43,44,49. Very few proteins were detected in the OMV fraction recovered from the extracellular medium of B. suis wild-type cells grown up to the exponential phase under normal conditions. In contrast, a considerable number of proteins were detected in the OMV fraction of ΔmapB cells, and about 60% of them corresponded to OMPs and periplasmic proteins. This observation suggests that defects in cell envelope homeostasis in ΔmapB cells favors OM vesiculation or, alternatively, leads to leakage of periplasmic proteins and release of OM fragments. It has been proposed that OMVs are generated by outward bulging of the OM in areas where proteins linking the OM to the peptidoglycan layer are absent. Furthermore, a role for OM-peptidoglycan linkages in vesicle production has been suggested50. It has been shown that cells in the growth exponential phase, which is under a high cell division rate, mainly produce OMVs at the division septa51,52. Furthermore, mutants displaying a compromised OM showed a hypervesiculating phenotype51,53. Based on these findings, a plausible hypothesis is that a weakening of the OM interaction with the peptidoglycan (like those mediated by proteins from the Omp25/31 family) in the ∆mapB mutant might result in the production of a higher number of vesicles (Fig. 6B). However, it should be noted that TEM analysis did not allow us to confirm this hypothesis due to the difficulty in quantifying OMVs. In any case, our observations support the idea that the OM homeostasis is impaired in the ∆mapB mutant. Another interesting (although indirect) observation is that the mutant LPS tends to drag more OMPs than that from wild type and complemented cells. Again, an impaired interaction of some OMPs with other components of the cell envelope, such as the peptidoglycan, might explain this observation.
It is possible that in Brucella, and other closely related bacteria, TamB proteins could play a role different from that previously described for E. coli, C. rodentium and S. typhimurium (all Gammaproteobacteria) TamB proteins19. Hence, the question arises as whether TamB proteins from different classes within the Proteobacteria phyla have evolved according to their life style to fulfill different functions related to the cell envelope biogenesis. In this regard, it is worth mentioning that in addition to the characteristic C-terminal DUF490 domain that is present in all TamB proteins, MapB harbors an extra (although incomplete) DUF490 domain (Fig. 1). This fact supports the idea of functional differences between TamB proteins of the Proteobacteria phylum. Interestingly, many phyla harboring a TamB homologue do not encode for autotransporters and in some phyla TamB is genetically associated with a BamA homologue, strongly suggesting a functional divergence in the evolution of TamB and its partners21. Moreover, mutants defective in A. actinomycetemcomitans (a gammaproteobacteria) and D. radiodurans TamB homologues (MorC for the former) showed that their cell envelopes were compromised22,25,54. These evidences support the hypothesis of a functional divergence between TamB homologues from different phyla.
Brucella cell envelope is more resistant to non-ionic detergents than that from E. coli55. The increased sensitivity to Triton X-100 (a non-ionic detergent) of the ∆mapB mutant might be explained by direct or indirect effects on fatty acid composition. However, we did not observe major differences in the amounts of membrane fatty acids. Nevertheless, modifications of less abundant fatty acids such as the very long chain fatty acids (VLCFAs) that substitute the LPS lipid A in Brucella cannot be ruled out46,56. Further structural studies on lipid A using more sensitive methods will be necessary to evaluate if the absence of MapB affects (directly or indirectly) lipid A VLCFA acylation. In addition, a low proportion in Brucella spp. OM phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) content has been related to polymyxin B resistance, and increased amounts of PE led to a sensitive phenotype to this reagent57. Therefore, it would also be interesting to analyze whether mapB mutation affects the phospholipid content.
The ΔmapB colony phenotype in the presence of the crystal violet dye was puzzling. It seems that the mutant is almost unable to retain the dye. It is known that the crystal violet dissociates into ions in solution and that the cation is responsible for bacterial staining upon its interaction with negatively charged components of the cell wall, including the LPS and the peptidoglycan. The reason for the mutant phenotype is unknown but it clearly implies critical alterations in cell envelope properties. The inability of the ∆mapB mutant cells to retain the dye could be explained either by a reduction in the cell wall negative charges or, based on evidence discussed so far, a weakening of interactions between different components of the cell envelope.
What has been discussed so far suggests that in Brucella, TAM might be necessary for a stable interaction of the OM with other components of the cell envelope, such as the peptidoglycan. This function might be fulfilled by aiding the anchoring of OMPs to the peptidoglycan and/or via other unknown mechanism. In addition of OMPs and lipoproteins, OM anchorage is performed by the Tol–Pal complex. The OM invagination occurring upon formation of the septum during cell division is believed to be aided by the Tol-Pal complex, which anchors the OM to the IM and contributes to the OM interaction with the peptidoglycan58. Bacteria defective in any Tol-Pal system component become susceptible to several toxic compounds (including detergents), exhibit delayed OM invagination and form high amounts of OMVs at constriction sites and cell poles58,59,60. In addition, the TAM system connects the IM to the OM through TamA-TamB interactions19,26, and apparently in B. suis it is necessary for cell envelope integrity and normal cell division. Therefore, the Brucella TAM might behave as another subcomplex that ensures cell envelope homeostasis during cell division.
We showed that MapB is required for efficient invasion and/or survival at initial stages of macrophage infection and also for bacterial persistence in mice. This is not surprising judging for the pleiotropic phenotype of ΔmapB. Furthermore, it has been proposed that the cell cycle and virulence of B. abortus are coordinated61,62. Thus, the linkage between MapB and cell division implies that bacteria lacking mapB will necessarily be affected in the efficiency of some virulence mechanisms. Furthermore, bacteria in the G1 cell cycle stage (newborn) are more infectious than their counterparts in S or G2 phases62. Hence, reduction in CFU recovered from macrophages infected with the ∆mapB mutant during the first hours after infection might indicate a lower proportion of infective newborn cell type at the onset of macrophage infection. Defects in cell division (and differentiation) of bacterial cells lacking MapB could be responsible for a negative effect in the generation of the infective cell type. For the same reason, reduction of infective cell species of ΔmapB might lead to a decrease in the infection efficiency of neighboring cells and finally in the spread of the infection. This hypothesis could explain the attenuated phenotype of the ΔmapB mutant in the mouse model. On the other hand, the instability of certain OMPs in the OM that represent in themselves virulence factors could also lead to impaired adhesion and survival in cell cultures and to an attenuated phenotype in mice. The absence of MapB might also affect bacterial survival during the first hours of mammalian cell infection. Reduced bacterial viability might be explained by defects in bacterial cell envelope homeostasis of ΔmapB mutant cells leading to loss of the cell envelope determinants that protect Brucella cells against host antimicrobials.
To conclude, in this work we provide compelling evidence that the B. suis TamB homologue (MapB) is highly relevant for outer membrane composition and stability. We propose that the TAM system in Brucella, and possibly in its close relatives, plays a determinant role in cell envelope assembly and in its coordination with cell division.
Methods
Bacterial strains, cell culture and media
Escherichia coli strains used in this study (DH5α and S17-1) were grown at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium. Antibiotics were added when needed: ampicillin 200 µg/ml, chloramphenicol 50 µg/ml, and tetracycline 5 µg/ml. Brucella suis 1330 wild-type (ATCC 23444) and the derivative strains were grown at 37 °C in rich medium Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB, BactoTM) or in Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA, BactoTM). Antibiotics were added when needed: chloramphenicol 6 µg/ml, kanamycin 50 µg/ml and nalidixic acid 10 µg/ml. All Brucella strains used in this study were manipulated in a biosafety level 3 laboratory. All E. coli and B. suis strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S4. J774A.1 murine macrophages cell line (ATCC® TIB-67™) were cultured in RPMI media (GIBCO), supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (PAA) and grown at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Molecular techniques
All DNA manipulations were carried out using standard procedures. All plasmids and primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables S4 and S5, respectively.
∆mapB strain construction
PCR primers containing restriction enzymes recognition sites were designed to amplify the flanking regions of mapB (BR0049*). Primers ∆mapB_F1 and ∆mapB_R1 amplify a region of 306 bp upstream mapB, and primers ∆mapB_F2 and ∆mapB_R2 a region of 391 bp downstream mapB. The generated PCR fragments were purified, digested with the corresponding restriction enzymes, ligated together and cloned into the pK18mobsacB mobilizable suicide vector (KmR)63 obtaining the pKmobsacBΔmapB plasmid. This plasmid was transformed into E. coli S17-1 and then conjugated with the B. suis wild type (wt) strain (NalR). Double recombinant clones were selected (NalR, KmS, sucroseR). The clean deletion of the entire open reading frame (ORF) was confirmed by PCR, and the absence of mapB gene was confirmed by RT-PCR.
Complementation of ∆mapB strain
The mapB gene was cloned into a broad-host-range vector, pBBR1MCS-1. A region of 5,284 bp containing 706 bp upstream mapB start codon, the mapB ORF and 30 bp downstream the stop codon was amplified using primers FComp and RComp. The amplified product was cloned into the pBBR1MCS-1 mid-number-copy plasmid64 obtaining the pBBRmapB plasmid, which was conjugated into B. suis ΔmapB strain. Complemented clones (∆mapB pBBRmapB) were selected (CmR) and confirmed by PCR.
Confirmation of gene expression and operon organization
Total RNA was isolated from B. suis wt using the Illustra RNAspin Mini Isolation Kit (GE). Subsequently, reverse transcription was performed with SuperScript III First Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer's instructions. In order to analyze gene expression by RT-PCR, different primers were used: FRTmapB and RRTmapB for mapB (BR0049); FRT48 and RRT48 for BR0048; and FRT50 and RRT50 for BR0050. To analyze if BR0048 and BR0049* form an operon, we conducted RT-PCR using the following primers: RtOpF and RtOpR. Control primers corresponding to Translation initiation factor if-1 (BR0249) were used: IF-1_Fw and IF-1_Rv65.
Genomic mapB3xFLAG tagging
An amplicon of 719 bp corresponding to the 3′ region of mapB ORF was amplified using primers MapB_fw_FLAG and MapB_rev_FLAG, and then subcloned into pQE1-3xFLAG plasmid using the EcoRI restriction enzyme site upstream the 3xFLAG sequence, obtaining the pQE1-3′mapB3xFLAG vector. The mapB 3′ fragment and the 3xFLAG sequence were cloned into the pK18mobSacB plasmid. The resultant pK18mobSacB3′mapB3xFLAG plasmid was transformed into E. coli S17-1 and then conjugated with the B. suis wt strain. Selection of double recombinants (NalR, KmS, sucroseR) was carried out.
Tolerance to different stresses
Tolerance to acidic pH and different compounds was assayed similarly as previously described9,10. Bacteria were incubated either in MM buffer pH 4.566, or with the compound of interest (0.1% DOC, 0.67 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.01% SDS), and then serial dilutions were plated in TSA. The CFU were counted, and the percentage of surviving bacteria relative to the control and the wt was calculated (% survival). Oxidative stress resistance by treatment with H2O2 was evaluated as previously described67.
The bactericidal effect of Polymyxin B was tested as follows: 2.5 × 105 CFU of each strain were incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with 0 (control), 10, 50 or 100 units/ml of Polymyxin B in 500 μl of 1 mM HEPES pH 8.0 (Sigma-Aldrich Co.). Tolerance was expressed as the mean percentage of CFU relative to non-treated bacteria.
B. suis lysozyme tolerance was studied as previously described68. Briefly, bacteria cultured in rich medium were harvested at an OD600 ≈ 0.6, and suspended in buffer 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 2 µg/ml lysozyme at RT. The OD600 of the suspension was measured every 10 seconds.
A serum resistance test was performed as previously described69. Briefly, bacteria were grown in rich media (TSB) at 37 °C up to early-logarithmic phase (OD600 betwen 0.3–0.5). Then the bacteria were washed with PBS-5 mM MgCl2 and suspended in the same buffer. A dilution was made with the same buffer in order to obtain a suspension of an OD600 of 0.01. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in 50% porcine serum. After 90 min serial dilutions were plated to determine the CFU. The CFU were counted, and the percentage of surviving bacteria relative to the control (time 0) and the wt was calculated (% survival). As control, serum complement was inactivated by incubating the serum at 56 °C for 30 min. The experiment was repeated in triplicate three times with similar results.
LPS Preparation and analysis
LPS was obtained by two independent protocols similar as previously described: isopropanol precipitation70, and hot-phenol extraction71. In both cases, after mixing with Laemmli sample buffer, the LPS suspension was analyzed by SDS-PAGE (15%) in Tris-glycine running buffer and visualized by carbohydrate-specific periodate oxidation and silver staining as previously described72. Otherwise, after resolving the samples by SDS-PAGE (15%) an immunochemical analysis was performed. Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with TBS 5% milk powder (w/v) for 2 h at 4 °C with gentle agitation, probed with monoclonal M84 anti-S-LPS antibody73 or anti-R-LPS antibody74 (1:1,000 and 1:3,000 respectively), and then probed with a goat HRP-conjugated secondary anti-mouse antibody (1:30,000 Santa Cruz). Finally, membranes were developed using ECL Prime (GE Healthcare) and ImageQuant LAS4000 Imager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences).
Crystal Violet (CV) staining of colonies was performed as previously described75. Colonies from rough strains are stained darker than smooth strains. Whenever mentioned, B. suis 1330 and B. ovis REO 198 strains were included as smooth and rough controls respectively.
Total lipid extraction and purification
Cultures were grown in Plommet medium76 and total lipids were extracted and purified by Bligh and Dyer method77. Total lipids were analyzed by GC/MS and TLC.
Protein preparation and analysis
Total proteins from the different Brucella strains were obtained by suspending bacterial pellets in Laemmli sample buffer. B. suis total membranes were prepared similarly as previously described78. Briefly, 100 ml of TSB cultures at an OD600≈ 1 were harvested by centrifuging 10 min at 5,000 × g, suspended in Protoplasting buffer (15 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.45 M sucrose, 8 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF and 2 mg/ml lysozyme for the wt strain and 1 mg/ml for the ∆mapB mutant) and incubated for 20 min on ice. Cells were then centrifuged 10 min at 4,200 × g and then suspended in Lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM PMSF, 10 ug/ml DNaseI, 2ug/ml RNase) and disrupted using Precellys24 (Bertin technologies): 7 cycles of 3 × 30 sec at 6,500 rpm, incubating on ice between each cycle. The homogenate was centrifuged for 2 min at 5,000 × g at 4 °C to remove unbroken cells and precellys beads, and the supernatant was then centrifuged at 5,000 × g for 30 min and then ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 90 min at 4 °C. The pellet was washed with 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0 and ultracentrifuged again. Laemmli sample buffer with 8 M urea was used to suspend the pellet. Samples were then heated for 10 min at 95 °C and subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. When required, total membrane fractions were treated with 5 mg/ml lysozyme for 30 min at 37 °C to digest the remaining peptidoglycan attached.
Protoplast (IM and cytoplasm) were separated from the OM and periplasm as previously described27. Briefly, cultures were harvested at exponential growth phase (OD600 ≈ 1). 2.5 × 1010 bacterial cells were centrifuged 10 min at 3,500 × g. The pellets were washed with physiological solution, centrifuged for 10 min at 3,500 × g and resuspended in 1 ml of 0.2 M Tris-HCl pH 7.6. Subsequently, 1 ml of 0.2 M Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 1 M sucrose and 0.25% Zwitterion 3–16 solution was added to the cell suspension and incubated for 10 min at RT. The samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 8,000 × g, the pellets separated from the supernatants and stored at −80 °C until used.
In each fractioning experiment, controls of the purification procedure were carried out by Western blot using anti-PhyR and anti-Omp1036 antibodies as cytoplasmic65 and membrane protein controls respectively. All samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver staining. Western blot analysis were performed after transferring the proteins to PVDF membranes (H-bond GE Healthcare), blocked ON with TBS 5% milk powder (w/v) at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Blots were probed with undiluted monoclonal mouse anti-OMPs hybridomes anti-Omp1, Omp2b, Omp10, Omp16, Omp19, Omp25 (A68/04B10/F05) and Omp31 (A59/10F09/G10)36,79 or primary mouse anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody (SIGMA) for 1 h at RT, followed by a 1 h incubation at RT with goat HRP-conjugated secondary anti-mouse antibody (1:30,000 Santa Cruz), and then developed using ECL Prime (GE Healthcare) in a ImageQuant LAS4000 Imager (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Gel band quantification was carried out with ImageJ program.
OMV purification
Cultures of the different strains were grown up to exponential phase. Next, cells were pelleted down at 5,000 × g at 4 °C. In order to remove residual cells, the supernatant was filtered using a 0.22-µm SFCA membrane (Minisart®; Sartorius). To harvest the OMVs, the filtrate was subjected to ultracentrifugation at 100,000 × g for 6 h at 4 °C (Beckman Coulter). The supernatant was discarded, the pellet containing the OMVs was washed with sterile PBS, and the ultracentrifugation step was repeated. The final pellet was suspended in PBS.
Proteomic analysis
Protein digestion and Mass Spectrometry analysis were performed at the Proteomics Core Facility (CEQUIBIEM), at the University of Buenos Aires (UBA-CONICET) as follows: whole membrane proteins were digested with 100 ng Trypsin (Promega V5111) in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.0 ON at 37 °C. Peptides were desalted using C18 zip tips (Merck Millipore) and eluted in 10 ul of H2O:ACN:FA 40:60:0.1%. The digests were analysed by nanoLC-MS/MS in a nanoHPLC EASY-nLC 1000 (Thermo Scientific) coupled to a QExactive Mass Spectrometer. A 120 min gradient of H2O:ACN at a flow of 33 nl/min was used with a C18 2 mm Easy Spray column × 150 mm. Data Dependent MS2 method was used to fragment the top 12 peaks in each cycle. The raw data from mass spectrometry analysis was processed using the Proteome Discoverer – version 2.1.1.21 – (Thermo Scientific) software for database searching with the SEQUEST search algorithm. The search was performed against the B. suis 1330 database. Precursor mass tolerance was set to 10 ppm and product ion tolerance to 0.05 Da. Static modification was set to carbamidomethylation of Cys, and dynamic modifications were set to oxidation of Met and N-terminal acetylation. Protein hits were filtered for high confidence peptide matches with a maximum protein and peptide false discovery rate of 1% calculated by employing a reverse database strategy.
In order to perform Label free quantification, samples were analyzed by triplicate. The data obtained for the area for each protein were processed with the Perseus program (Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 1.5.5.3 version, available for free) which allows a deeper statistical analysis. For each couple of samples, we plotted -log p-value (-Log Student T-test p-value A_B) on the y axis versus Student T-test Difference A_B in x axis. Proteins that appear in the volcano plot with a fold change greater than 2 (less than -1 or greater than 1 on the x axis of the graph) and a p-value below 0.05 (above 1.3 on the y axis of the graph) were considered as differentially expressed.
Electron microscopy
For TEM analysis, bacterial cultures at an OD600 ≈ 2.5 were harvested, washed twice with phosphate buffer and fixed in 2% v/v glutaraldehyde (SIGMA GradeI 25%) in phosphate buffer pH 7.2–7.4 for 2 h at 4 °C. Secondary fixation was performed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at 4 °C and then the samples were dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations and included in an epoxy resin. Ultrathin sections (90 nm) were contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. The samples were examined in the transmission electron microscope JEM 1200 EX II (JEOL) in the Central Service of Electron Microscopy at the Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, UNLP.
For SEM analysis, bacterial cultures at an OD600 ≈ 2.5 were fixed in 2% v/v glutaraldehyde (SIGMA GradeI 25%) for 15 min at RT, and mounted in coverslips pretreated with poly-D-lysine. The samples were dehydrated in increasing ethanol concentrations (from 20 to 100%, 3 times each concentration, for 5 min each time)80. After critical point drying and metallization, samples were mounted into the grids with carbon tape and observed at Center of Advance Microscopy (CMA- FCEyN UBA) using a Carl Zeiss NTS SUPRA 40.
Cell infection assays
Cell infection assays were carried out similarly as previously described27. Briefly, J774A.1 murine macrophages cells were seeded in 24-well plates and inoculated with the different Brucella strains (MOI 1:100). Intracellular viable bacteria were determined by standard gentamicin-protection assay followed by cell lysis with 0.1% Sodium Deoxycolate (DOC) and plating serial dilutions.
Virulence in BALB/c mice
Animal procedures and management protocols were approved by the local Institutional Animal Welfare Committee (“Comité de Bienestar Animal”, protocol number 225/2015) according to Animal Welfare Policy (Act 087/02) of the Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria (CIVETAN).
Six to eight weeks-old female BALB/c mice were purchased from the animal facility at Leloir Institute. They were randomly distributed in experimental groups at least 1 week before being inoculated. The animals were housed in a filter-ventilated containment in the Laboratory Animal Facility of the Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria (CIVETAN), CONICET-Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (U.N.C.P.B.A) receiving water and food ad libitum. All experimental protocols were performed by the premise of minimizing the suffering to which animals are exposed and using the minimum number of experimental animals to ensure statistically significant results. BALB/c mice (16 per group) were inoculated by intragastric delivery with B. suis wt (1.30 × 108 CFU/mouse), ΔmapB mutant strain (1.23 × 108 CFU/mouse) or the complemented ΔmapB pBBRmapB strain (1.29 × 108 CFU/mouse), suspended in 300 µl of 10% sodium bicarbonate by use of a plastic feeding tube introduced through the mouth. Five mice from each group were sacrificed at 7, 15 and 45 days post infection (p.i.), and spleens were removed. Serial dilutions of spleen homogenates were plated in duplicate on TSA and the CFU were counted after 4 days post incubation at 37 °C. The CFU data was normalized by log transformation and evaluated by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s posteriori test (Prism 5.0; GraphPad Software, Inc.). Data is shown as the log10 (CFU/spleen). The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.
Bioinformatic analysis
Domains search was carried out using Pfam81,82. Signal peptide sequence and subcellular localization were predicted using SignalP Server83 and Gneg-mploc84. Alignments were performed with MUSCLE85. Transmembrane segments were predicted with TMpred transmembrane prediction86, and molecular weight was predicted using Compute pI/Mw from ExPASy87. Operon prediction was carried out using MicrobesOnline Operon Predictions88. Secondary structure was predicted by Phyre89 and Jpred 490.
References
Seleem, M. N., Boyle, S. M. & Sriranganathan, N. Brucellosis: a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Microbiol 140, 392–398, S0378-1135(09)00305-8 [pii]10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.021 (2010).
von Bargen, K., Gorvel, J. P. & Salcedo, S. P. Internal affairs: investigating the Brucella intracellular lifestyle. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36, 533–562, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00334.x (2012).
Martirosyan, A., Moreno, E. & Gorvel, J. P. An evolutionary strategy for a stealthy intracellular Brucella pathogen. Immunol Rev 240, 211–234, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00982.x (2011).
Vizcaino, N., Cloeckaert, A., Zygmunt, M. S. & Dubray, G. Cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of the Brucella melitensis omp31 gene coding for an immunogenic major outer membrane protein. Infect Immun 64, 3744–3751 (1996).
Moriyon, I. & Lopez-Goni, I. Structure and properties of the outer membranes of Brucella abortus and Brucella melitensis. International microbiology: the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology 1, 19–26 (1998).
Cloeckaert, A., Vizcaíno, N., Paquet, J.-Y., Bowden, R. A. & Elzer, P. H. Major outer membrane proteins of Brucella spp.: past, present and future. Vet Microbiol 90, 229–247 (2002).
Cloeckaert, A., Zygmunt, M. S., de Wergifosse, P., Dubray, G. & Limet, J. N. Demonstration of peptidoglycan-associated Brucella outer-membrane proteins by use of monoclonal antibodies. J Gen Microbiol 138, 1543–1550, https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-138-7-1543 (1992).
Cardoso, P. G., Macedo, G. C., Azevedo, V. & Oliveira, S. C. Brucella spp noncanonical LPS: structure, biosynthesis, and interaction with host immune system. Microb Cell Fact 5, 13 (2006).
Martínez de Tejada, G., Pizarro-Cerdá, J., Moreno, E. & Moriyón, I. The outer membranes of Brucella spp. are resistant to bactericidal cationic peptides. Infect Immun 63, 3054–3061 (1995).
Freer, E. et al. Brucella-Salmonella lipopolysaccharide chimeras are less permeable to hydrophobic probes and more sensitive to cationic peptides and EDTA than are their native Brucella sp. counterparts. J Bacteriol 178, 5867–5876 (1996).
Barquero-Calvo, E. et al. Brucella abortus uses a stealthy strategy to avoid activation of the innate immune system during the onset of infection. PLoS ONE 2, e631 (2007).
Posadas, D. M., Ruiz-Ranwez, V., Bonomi, H. R., Martin, F. A. & Zorreguieta, A. BmaC, a novel autotransporter of Brucella suis, is involved in bacterial adhesion to host cells. Cell Microbiol 14, 965–982, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01771.x (2012).
Ruiz-Ranwez, V. et al. BtaE, an adhesin that belongs to the trimeric autotransporter family, is required for full virulence and defines a specific adhesive pole of Brucella suis. Infect Immun 81, 996–1007, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.01241-12IAI.01241-12 (2013).
Ruiz-Ranwez, V. et al. The BtaF trimeric autotransporter of Brucella suis is involved in attachment to various surfaces, resistance to serum and virulence. PLoS ONE 8, e79770, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079770PONE-D-13-29616 (2013).
Benz, I. & Schmidt, M. A. Structures and functions of autotransporter proteins in microbial pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol 301, 461–468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2011.03.003 (2011).
Lyskowski, A., Leo, J. C. & Goldman, A. Structure and biology of trimeric autotransporter adhesins. Adv Exp Med Biol 715, 143–158, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0940-9_9 (2011).
Leyton, D. L., Rossiter, A. E. & Henderson, I. R. From self sufficiency to dependence: mechanisms and factors important for autotransporter biogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 10, 213–225, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2733 (2012).
Heinz, E. & Lithgow, T. A comprehensive analysis of the Omp85/TpsB protein superfamily structural diversity, taxonomic occurrence, and evolution. Frontiers in microbiology 5, 370, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00370 (2014).
Selkrig, J. et al. Discovery of an archetypal protein transport system in bacterial outer membranes. Nature structural & molecular biology 19(506–510), S501, https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2261 (2012).
Josts, I. et al. The Structure of a Conserved Domain of TamB Reveals a Hydrophobic beta Taco Fold. Structure 25, 1898–1906 e1895, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2017.10.002 (2017).
Heinz, E., Selkrig, J., Belousoff, M. J. & Lithgow, T. Evolution of the Translocation and Assembly Module (TAM). Genome biology and evolution 7, 1628–1643, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evv097 (2015).
Azari, F. et al. Ultrastructural analysis of the rugose cell envelope of a member of the Pasteurellaceae family. J Bacteriol 195, 1680–1688, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.02149-12 (2013).
Smith, K. P. et al. Alteration in abundance of specific membrane proteins of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is attributed to deletion of the inner membrane protein MorC. Proteomics 15, 1859–1867, https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201400505 (2015).
Iqbal, H., Kenedy, M. R., Lybecker, M. & Akins, D. R. The TamB ortholog of Borrelia burgdorferi interacts with the beta-barrel assembly machine (BAM) complex protein BamA. Mol Microbiol 102, 757–774, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13492 (2016).
Yu, J. et al. A tamB homolog is involved in maintenance of cell envelope integrity and stress resistance of Deinococcus radiodurans. Scientific reports 7, 45929, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45929 (2017).
Selkrig, J. et al. Conserved features in TamA enable interaction with TamB to drive the activity of the translocation and assembly module. Scientific reports 5, 12905, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12905 (2015).
Dohmer, P. H., Valguarnera, E., Czibener, C. & Ugalde, J. E. Identification of a type IV secretion substrate of Brucella abortus that participates in the early stages of intracellular survival. Cell Microbiol 16, 396–410, https://doi.org/10.1111/cmi.12224 (2014).
Freer, E. et al. The outer membrane of Brucella ovis shows increased permeability to hydrophobic probes and is more susceptible to cationic peptides than are the outer membranes of mutant rough Brucella abortus strains. Infect Immun 67, 6181–6186 (1999).
White, P. G. & Wilson, J. B. Differentiation of smooth and nonsmooth colonies of Brucellae. J Bacteriol 61, 239–240 (1951).
Gamazo, C., Vitas, A. I., Moriyón, I., López-Goñi, I. & Díaz, R. Brucella group 3 outer membrane proteins contain a heat-modifiable protein. FEMS Microbiol Lett 112, 141–146 (1993).
Chang, Y. Y. & Cronan, J. E. Jr. Membrane cyclopropane fatty acid content is a major factor in acid resistance of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 33, 249–259 (1999).
Gatsos, X. et al. Protein secretion and outer membrane assembly in Alphaproteobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32, 995–1009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00130.x (2008).
Mobasheri, H., Ficht, T. A., Marquis, H., Lea, E. J. & Lakey, J. H. Brucella Omp2a and Omp2b porins: single channel measurements and topology prediction. FEMS Microbiol Lett 155, 23–30 (1997).
Salhi, I. et al. Characterization of new members of the group 3 outer membrane protein family of Brucella spp. Infect Immun 71, 4326–4332 (2003).
Tibor, A., Decelle, B. & Letesson, J. J. Outer membrane proteins Omp10, Omp16, and Omp19 of Brucella spp. are lipoproteins. Infect Immun 67, 4960–4962 (1999).
Cloeckaert, A., de Wergifosse, P., Dubray, G. & Limet, J. N. Identification of seven surface-exposed Brucella outer membrane proteins by use of monoclonal antibodies: immunogold labeling for electron microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Infect Immun 58, 3980–3987 (1990).
Martin-Martin, A. I. et al. Analysis of the occurrence and distribution of the Omp25/Omp31 family of surface proteins in the six classical Brucella species. Vet Microbiol 137, 74–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.12.003 (2009).
Caro-Hernandez, P. et al. Role of the Omp25/Omp31 family in outer membrane properties and virulence of Brucella ovis. Infect Immun 75, 4050–4061, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00486-07 (2007).
Posadas, D. M. et al. The TolC homologue of Brucella suis is involved in resistance to antimicrobial compounds and virulence. Infect Immun 75, 379–389 (2007).
Magnet, S., Dubost, L., Marie, A., Arthur, M. & Gutmann, L. Identification of the L,D-transpeptidases for peptidoglycan cross-linking in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 190, 4782–4785, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00025-08 (2008).
Grangeon, R., Zupan, J. R., Anderson-Furgeson, J. & Zambryski, P. C. PopZ identifies the new pole, and PodJ identifies the old pole during polar growth in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112, 11666–11671, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515544112 (2015).
Cook, P. D. & Holden, H. M. GDP-perosamine synthase: structural analysis and production of a novel trideoxysugar. Biochemistry 47, 2833–2840, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi702430d (2008).
Gamazo, C. & Moriyón, I. Release of outer membrane fragments by exponentially growing Brucella melitensis cells. Infect Immun 55, 609–615 (1987).
Lamontagne, J. et al. Extensive cell envelope modulation is associated with virulence in Brucella abortus. Journal of proteome research 6, 1519–1529 (2007).
Delpino, M. V. et al. A bile salt hydrolase of Brucella abortus contributes to the establishment of a successful infection through the oral route in mice. Infect Immun 75, 299–305, https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00952-06 (2007).
Manterola, L. et al. The lipopolysaccharide of Brucella abortus BvrS/BvrR mutants contains lipid A modifications and has higher affinity for bactericidal cationic peptides. J Bacteriol 187, 5631–5639 (2005).
Sieira, R. et al. Combinatorial control of adhesion of Brucella abortus 2308 to host cells by transcriptional rewiring of the trimeric autotransporter btaE gene. Mol Microbiol 103, 553–565, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13576 (2017).
Francis, N. et al. CtrA controls cell division and outer membrane composition of the pathogen Brucella abortus. Mol Microbiol 103, 780–797, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.13589 (2017).
Kulp, A. & Kuehn, M. J. Biological functions and biogenesis of secreted bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Annu Rev Microbiol 64, 163–184, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073413 (2010).
Deatherage, B. L. et al. Biogenesis of bacterial membrane vesicles. Mol Microbiol 72, 1395–1407, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06731.x (2009).
Katsui, N. et al. Heat-induced blebbing and vesiculation of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 151, 1523–1531 (1982).
Mug-Opstelten, D. & Witholt, B. Preferential release of new outer membrane fragments by exponentially growing Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta 508, 287–295 (1978).
Haurat, M. F., Elhenawy, W. & Feldman, M. F. Prokaryotic membrane vesicles: new insights on biogenesis and biological roles. Biological chemistry 396, 95–109, https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2014-0183 (2015).
Gallant, C. V., Sedic, M., Chicoine, E. A., Ruiz, T. & Mintz, K. P. Membrane morphology and leukotoxin secretion are associated with a novel membrane protein of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. J Bacteriol 190, 5972–5980, https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00548-08 (2008).
Moriyon, I. & Berman, D. T. Effects of nonionic, ionic, and dipolar ionic detergents and EDTA on the Brucella cell envelope. J Bacteriol 152, 822–828 (1982).
Conde-Alvarez, R. et al. The lipopolysaccharide core of Brucella abortus acts as a shield against innate immunity recognition. PLoS Pathog 8, e1002675, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002675 (2012).
Kerrinnes, T. et al. Phospholipase A1 modulates the cell envelope phospholipid content of Brucella melitensis, contributing to polymyxin resistance and pathogenicity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59, 6717–6724, https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00792-15 (2015).
Gerding, M. A., Ogata, Y., Pecora, N. D., Niki, H. & de Boer, P. A. The trans-envelope Tol-Pal complex is part of the cell division machinery and required for proper outer-membrane invagination during cell constriction in E. coli. Mol Microbiol 63, 1008–1025, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2006.05571.x (2007).
Bernadac, A., Gavioli, M., Lazzaroni, J. C., Raina, S. & Lloubes, R. Escherichia coli tol-pal mutants form outer membrane vesicles. J Bacteriol 180, 4872–4878 (1998).
Webster, R. E. The tol gene products and the import of macromolecules into Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 5, 1005–1011 (1991).
De Bolle, X., Crosson, S., Matroule, J. Y. & Letesson, J. J. Brucella abortus Cell Cycle and Infection Are Coordinated. Trends Microbiol 23, 812–821, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.09.007 (2015).
Deghelt, M. et al. G1-arrested newborn cells are the predominant infectious form of the pathogen Brucella abortus. Nature communications 5, 4366, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5366 (2014).
Schafer, A. et al. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene 145, 69–73 (1994).
Kovach, M. E. et al. Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene 166, 175–176 (1995).
Sycz, G. et al. LOV Histidine Kinase Modulates the General Stress Response System and Affects the virB Operon Expression in Brucella abortus. PLoS One 10, e0124058, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124058 (2015).
Rouot, B. et al. Production of the type IV secretion system differs among Brucella species as revealed with VirB5- and VirB8-specific antisera. Infect Immun 71, 1075–1082 (2003).
Zhang, X., Ren, J., Li, N., Liu, W. & Wu, Q. Disruption of the BMEI0066 gene attenuates the virulence of Brucella melitensis and decreases its stress tolerance. International journal of biological sciences 5, 570–577 (2009).
Sekiguchi, M. & Iida, S. Mutants of Escherichia coli permeable to actinomycin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 58, 2315–2320 (1967).
Heesemann, J. et al. Plasmids of human strains of Yersinia enterocolitica: molecular relatedness and possible importance for pathogenesis. J Infect Dis 147, 107–115 (1983).
Garin-Bastuji, B., Bowden, R. A., Dubray, G. & Limet, J. N. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting analysis of smooth-lipopolysaccharide heterogeneity among Brucella biovars related to A and M specificities. J Clin Microbiol 28, 2169–2174 (1990).
Moreno, E., Pitt, M. W., Jones, L. M., Schurig, G. G. & Berman, D. T. Purification and characterization of smooth and rough lipopolysaccharides from Brucella abortus. J Bacteriol 138, 361–369 (1979).
Tsai, C. M. & Frasch, C. E. A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharides in polyacrylamide gels. Anal Biochem 119, 115–119 (1982).
Nielsen, K. H., Kelly, L., Gall, D., Nicoletti, P. & Kelly, W. Improved competitive enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 46, 285–291 (1995).
Cloeckaert, A., Zygmunt, M. S., Dubray, G. & Limet, J. N. Characterization of O-polysaccharide specific monoclonal antibodies derived from mice infected with the rough Brucella melitensis strain B115. J Gen Microbiol 139, 1551–1556, https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-139-7-1551 (1993).
Corbel, M. G., KPW., Thomas, E. L., Hendry, D. Mc. LFD. (ed. Alnwick MAFFPublications, UK) (1983).
Plommet, M. Minimal requirements for growth of Brucella suis and other Brucella species. Zentralblatt fur Bakteriologie: international journal of medical microbiology 275, 436–450 (1991).
Bligh, E. G. & Dyer, W. J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian journal of biochemistry and physiology 37, 911–917, https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099 (1959).
Klingman, K. L. & Murphy, T. F. Purification and characterization of a high-molecular-weight outer membrane protein of Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis. Infect Immun 62, 1150–1155 (1994).
Cloeckaert, A. et al. Protection conferred on mice by monoclonal antibodies directed against outer-membrane-protein antigens of Brucella. J Med Microbiol 34, 175–180, https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-34-3-175 (1991).
Fischer, E. R., Hansen, B. T., Nair, V., Hoyt, F. H. & Dorward, D. W. Scanning electron microscopy. Curr Protoc Microbiol Chapter 2, Unit2B 2, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259.mc02b02s25 (2012).
Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D222–230, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1223 (2014).
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402, doi:gka562 [pii] (1997).
Bendtsen, J. D., Nielsen, H., von Heijne, G. & Brunak, S. Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0. J Mol Biol 340, 783–795, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2004.05.028 (2004).
Shen, H. B. & Chou, K. C. Gneg-mPLoc: a top-down strategy to enhance the quality of predicting subcellular localization of Gram-negative bacterial proteins. Journal of theoretical biology 264, 326–333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.01.018 (2010).
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 1792–1797, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh34032/5/1792 (2004).
Hofmann, K. & Stoffel, W. In Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler Vol. 374 (1993).
Wilkins, M. R. et al. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods in molecular biology 112, 531–552 (1999).
Price, M. N., Huang, K. H., Alm, E. J. & Arkin, A. P. A novel method for accurate operon predictions in all sequenced prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 880–892, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki232 (2005).
Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nature protocols 10, 845–858, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2015.053 (2015).
Drozdetskiy, A., Cole, C., Procter, J. & Barton, G. J. JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 43, W389–394, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv332 (2015).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Armando J. Parodi for his helpful and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Xavier de Bolle, Juan Ugalde and Juliana Cassataro for gently providing the anti-OMPs and anti-LPS antibodies, Juan Manuel Spera for kindly providing the PQE31-3xFLAG plasmid, Marta Bravo for DNA sequencing, colleagues from the microscopy services, especially Susana Jurado and Lia Pietrasanta. Additional thanks to Diana Posadas for helpful discussions and to colleagues from the CEQUIBIEM service, Silvia Moreno, German Fernandez and Pia Valacco. This work was funded by Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (http://www.agencia.mincyt.gob.ar) grants PICT 2012-2171 (AZ) and PICT 2016-2722 (AZ).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.G.B. and V.R.R. designed and carried out most of the experiments; G.S., D.M.R. and S.A. provided expertise and performed some of the experiments, S.M.E. performed the in vivo virulence experiment, R.S. provided expertise and evaluated data, M.G.B., V.R.R., G.S., R.S. and A.Z. evaluated results. A.Z. wrote the manuscript and is corresponding author. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bialer, M.G., Ruiz-Ranwez, V., Sycz, G. et al. MapB, the Brucella suis TamB homologue, is involved in cell envelope biogenesis, cell division and virulence. Sci Rep 9, 2158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37668-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37668-3
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
The TAM, a Translocation and Assembly Module for protein assembly and potential conduit for phospholipid transfer
EMBO Reports (2024)
-
Surveying membrane landscapes: a new look at the bacterial cell surface
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2023)