Abstract
Chromatin folding shows spatio-temporal fluctuations in living undifferentiated cells, but fixed spatial heterogeneity in differentiated cells. However, little is known about variation in folding stability along the chromatin fibres during differentiation. In addition, effective methods to investigate folding stability at the single cell level are lacking. In the present study, we developed a microfluidic device that enables non-destructive isolation of chromosomes from single mammalian cells as well as real-time microscopic monitoring of the partial unfolding and stretching of individual chromosomes with increasing salt concentrations under a gentle flow. Using this device, we compared the folding stability of chromosomes between non-differentiated and differentiated cells and found that the salt concentration which induces the chromosome unfolding was lower (≤500 mM NaCl) for chromosomes derived from undifferentiated cells, suggesting that the chromatin folding stability of these cells is lower than that of differentiated cells. In addition, individual unfolded chromosomes, i.e., chromatin fibres, were stretched to 150–800 µm non-destructively under 750 mM NaCl and showed distributions of highly/less folded regions along the fibres. Thus, our technique can provide insights into the aspects of chromatin folding that influence the epigenetic control of cell differentiation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
In eukaryotic cells, genomic DNA bound to histones is folded and stored in the nucleus. Cellular activity is maintained by the expression of genes at the appropriate place and time, which requires the partial loosening of DNA–histone complexes. Since the control of gene expression involves chemical modifications of DNA bases and histones that alter the folding stability (loosening or tightening) of the chromatin at specific sites, gene expression profiles vary according to cell type and differentiation status1. Transcriptional activity differs among allogeneic cells2,3,4, and cancerous tissues harbour a mixed population of cells with distinct expression profiles5. As such, there is a need for a technique that enables epigenetic analyses at the single-cell level to evaluate the relationship between the distribution of chemical modifications of DNA or histones and the folding stability of chromatin as well as gene expression profiles. This information can provide insight into the mechanisms by which a state of differentiation is induced or maintained and how these mechanisms contribute to cancer development.
Micrococcal nuclease sequencing, chromatin conformation capture sequencing, assay for transposase-accessible chromatin by high-throughput sequencing, and chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing are analytical methods that can be used to identify DNA sites that lack or harbour loosely bound histones or that are bound by specific proteins at a single-base resolution6,7,8,9,10. However, since these approaches involve a DNA fragmentation step prior to sequencing and utilise short read sequences, it is difficult to obtain information about higher-order DNA structure and folding stability. In addition, whole-genome coverage is low when these methods are applied to single cells due to sample loss during preparation11.
Immunofluorescence labelling of chromosomes is another epigenetic analysis technique12 that can be applied to single cells. In this method, chromosomes are spread out on a glass substrate near the source cells, which are seeded on the substrate with adequate spacing. However, this approach does not provide high-resolution information about the distribution of chemical modifications or folding stability along chromatin fibres. In addition, it is difficult to investigate changes in the higher-order folding structure resulting from alterations in the conditions of the surrounding solution—which alter the strength of interactions between DNA and DNA-binding proteins—due to the adsorption of chromosomes onto the glass substrate. Consequently, a technique that allows for the examination of chromosomes isolated from single cells without fragmentation and adsorption onto a substrate is needed.
Studies pioneering the use of single cell- and single chromosome-based techniques to investigate the properties of chromosomes have involved the extraction of mitotic chromosomes from mammalian/amphibian cells in an open cell culture dish under a microscope using micromanipulator-assisted micro-needles/-pipettes13,14. This approach has revealed the reversible condensation/decondensation of mitotic chromosomes by exposure to various cationic solutions in the open dish. However, this method has not been used to determine the correlation between the differentiation state of cells and the distribution of chromosome/chromatin folding stability. This lack of investigation may be attributed to practical challenges, e.g., sequential solution exchanges and the precise control of solution conditions in the open dish during the micromanipulation of cells/chromosomes.
Recently, microfluidic devices have been utilised in single cell/molecule-level biochemical analyses/experiments15,16,17,18. A characteristic feature of microfluidic devices is their ability to precisely control solution conditions by introducing the solution of interest into microfluidic channels. Although such devices have been used for various types of bioanalysis, methods for investigating chromatin/chromosomes, i.e., the complex of DNA and proteins, in single cells are less developed than those used for single-cell genome-wide gene expression analyses in which the analyte is basically naked fragmented DNA. To date, nano-/microfluidic channel devices for chromosome/large genomic DNA analysis that have been developed employ off-chip-prepared chromosomes/genomic DNA and have not yet been used for single cell-based experiments19,20,21.
We recently developed a method for isolating intact chromatin fibres from individual fission yeast cells that were then tethered to a microstructure for optical mapping after immunofluorescence labelling22 or for the evaluation of changes in chromatin folding in a solution that alters the strength of interactions between chromatin and associated proteins using microfluidic channels23. In this study, we further developed this microfluidic system and used it to compare the stability of chromatin folding in mammalian cells at various stages of differentiation (undifferentiated vs. differentiated). We found that the differentiation state was correlated with the folding stability of chromosomes. This is the first report of a method for isolating a chromosome in its native form from a target mammalian cell for single-molecule biochemical experiments using a microfluidic channel under a microscope. This technique can provide information concerning the distribution of chromatin folding stability along individual chromatin fibres. It will therefore be useful for single-cell/whole-genome analyses of chromatin, which are expected to provide novel insights into the epigenetic control of gene expression.
Results
A microfluidic device with an optically-driven microtool for the extraction of chromosomes and investigation of their stability
For the isolation and investigation of chromosomes from single mammalian cells, a microfluidic device was assembled by bonding a microfabricated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, commonly known as silicone rubber) chip onto a coverslip (Fig. 1a). The PDMS chip was fabricated using standard soft lithography24, as described in the Supplementary Material. The device had two main channels with micropockets along the side walls and micropillars on the floor of the channels (Fig. 1b). The micropockets served as reaction chambers in which solution conditions were altered by introducing different solutions into the main channels, with solutes diffusing between the main channels and the micropockets25,26,27,28. The basic structure of the device was similar to the one reported in our previous study, which focused on yeast spheroplasts22. However, since mammalian cells are much larger (diameter: ca. 20–30 µm), the height of the microchannel was increased to 60 µm and larger micropockets were created (entrance width: 50 µm, depth: 250 µm, length of the trapezoid base: 290 µm). Micropillars were used to tether isolated chromosomes by suspending chromosome-attached antibody-conjugated microspheres within the slit between the micropillars against the solution flow in the main channels22, which enabled direct observation of changes in the higher-order structures of the isolated chromosomes. It should be noted that the micropillars appear fork-shaped when viewed from the side, but concave or convex (fan-shaped) from viewed from underneath, through the coverslip of the device (Fig. 1b right, 1c (i)). Here, the gap between the micropillars was slightly larger from the coverslip (floor) side to PDMS (ceiling) side (Fig. 1c(i)), which was due to our photolithographic exposure system. Consequently, microspheres were usually captured at the base of micropillars under the flow (Fig. 1c(i), c(ii)). This ensures that the tethered chromosomes are in a suspended position away from the PDMS ceiling to prevent non-specific binding while permitting maximum exposure to the flow (assuming a plane Poiseuille flow with maximum flow velocity at the half height of the microchannel). Here, emphasis was on achieving chromosome suspension away from the channel ceiling/floor; the shape of the micropillars was of little importance. To realise this, in the present study, we employed fork-shaped micropillars to achieve both tethering and suspension of the chromosomes within the microchannel, allowing for the direct observation of changes in their higher-order structures. In our previous work, we used convex micropillars with slits for trapping antibody-conjugated microspheres attached to individual chromosomes22. Since the fabrication of the convex micropillars was already established in our previous work, we used them as references for assessing the successful fabrication of the concave micropillars used in the present study. For this reason, in Fig. 1b, the two types of pairs of micropillars appear adjacent to one another within the new microfluidic device. It should be noted that, in comparison to the convex micropillars, the newly-designed concave micropillars used in this study improved the visibility of the chromosome, especially around the tethering point. The detailed size and layout of the microstructures are described in the Supplementary Material (Figure S1).
MethylRO mouse cells expressing a methyl-CpG-binding domain (MBD)-red fluorescent protein (RFP) fusion protein that binds to methylated DNA were used in these experiments (Fig. 2a)29. Cell suspension was placed into one of the three inlet wells (Fig. 1a, left end) and sucked into the main channels. A hypotonic solution or a solution of interest was then introduced through the two remaining ports. Using two ports helped to prevent backflow during solution exchange, and the selective use of the three ports reduced the influx of cell debris into the two main channels (details are described in the Methods section). To manipulate cells and chromosomes in the enclosed space of the microchannels and micropockets, optical tweezers were used. Optical tweezers use laser light to trap a micrometre-sized object at the laser focus point formed by an objective lens when the refractive index of the object is greater than that of the surrounding medium30. Using this method, cells and compacted chromosomes suspended in aqueous solution can be trapped and translocated individually in a non-destructive manner. However, unfolded chromosomes cannot be trapped by optical tweezers owing to their lower chromatin packing density. Hence, we developed an optically-driven microtool consisting of antibody-conjugated microspheres which can attach to a target protein associated with the chromatin, and which can be manipulated individually by optical tweezers22. By utilising the property of antigen–antibody binding, the micromanipulation of individual chromosomes through the microspheres was achieved. In this study, anti-RFP antibody-conjugated microspheres were prepared and used as the optically-driven microtool (Fig. 2b). It should be noted that the peri-centromeric region of mouse chromosomes contains hypermethylated DNA region31,32, and the short arms of mouse chromosomes are very short, i.e., chromosomes are telocentric, giving them a narrow V-shaped morphology. Thus, the peri-centromeric region where MBD-RFP proteins accumulate, i.e., the vertex of the V-shaped morphology, is easily captured using the antibody-conjugated microspheres.
The basic procedure for the manipulation of single cells and single chromosomes by the optically-driven microtool within the specially designed microfluidic device is as follows:
-
(I)
Cells synchronised in M phase were introduced into the main channels of the microfluidic device and some cells were individually placed in separate micropockets using optical tweezers (Fig. 2a). Chromosomes—the highly compacted form of individual genomic DNA molecules—in M phase can be individually distinguished and manipulated.
-
(II)
The main channels were flushed with isotonic solution to remove excess cells, after which a hypotonic solution was then introduced, causing cells to burst from osmotic shock; as a result, chromosomes were released from the cells. After chromosome extraction in each micropocket, antibody-conjugated microspheres were introduced into the main channels, and individual chromosomes were captured at the peri-centromeric region using optical tweezers. Captured chromosomes were transported from the micropockets to the main channel (Fig. 2b).
-
(III)
Translocated chromosomes were then tethered to the slit between micropillars via the antibody-conjugated microspheres and exposed to solutions of interest, e.g., high-salt solutions, which were introduced into the main channels. Tethered chromosomes were oriented along the direction of the flow; therefore, when the chromosomes unfolded, the spatial resolution along the chromosomes was improved (Fig. 2c).
It should be noted that this tethering method utilising micropillars is suitable for observation of individual non-fragmented chromosomes/chromatins that span multiple frames of a video microscope.
Extraction, translocation, and tethering of chromosomes from single MEFs and ES cells
Chromosomes were extracted from mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) (Fig. 3a) and embryonic stem (ES) cells (Fig. 3b) in each micropocket by introducing a hypotonic solution into the main channels. This resulted in the swelling of cells, which eventually burst within 3–5 min, rapidly releasing intact chromosomes (Supplementary Movie 1). Soon after bursting, Triton X solution was introduced into the device for 10–15 min to lyse the cell membrane. As a result, some chromosomes became dispersed, while others remained attached to one other. In subsequent experiments, we focused on the separated chromosomes, which typically accounted for ≤10% of the total number of chromosomes. It should be noted that there was no major difference between MEFs and ES cells in terms of the success rate for the extraction of individual chromosomes. After the establishment of one-to-one binding between separated chromosomes and anti-RFP antibody-conjugated microspheres, Triton X solution containing anti-RFP antibody (2 µg/ml) was introduced into the main channels for 10–15 min to flush out excess microspheres, and to prevent multiple microspheres from binding to the captured chromosomes as well as the dissociation of MBD-RFP from methylated DNA as the salt concentration increased. Following this, the main channels were once again flushed with Triton X solution and chromosome tethering was performed.
Figure 3c shows an example of the translocation and tethering of a chromosome from a MEF (hereafter, MEF chromosomes). The corresponding movie file is available in the Supplementary Material (Movie 2). This tethering process took 5–10 min and 1–3 chromosomes were usually tethered individually at the micropillars. During translocation, the morphology of the captured MEF chromosomes remained unaltered, despite the shear force, and they maintained the typical telocentric chromosome shape (e.g., Fig. 3c left, 6 s).
Chromosomes extracted from ES cells (hereafter, ES cell chromosomes) swelled slightly during lysis of cell membrane with Triton X solution, becoming less compact. In fact, the captured chromosomes became unfolded and stretched (by 5–6 times, ~40 µm in contour length) during translocation using antibody-conjugated microspheres due to hydrodynamic shear force (Supplementary Movie 3), making it almost impossible to tether them to the slit between the micropillars from their trailing end. To stabilise ES cell chromosome morphology according to a chromosome sorting method33, we exposed extracted ES cell chromosomes to a Triton X solution containing 100 mM KCl. The addition of salt prevented the unfolding of chromosomes obtained from ES cells (Supplementary Movie 4) and facilitated their translocation and tethering, which was similar to that of MEF chromosomes.
Folding stability of MEF chromosomes
After tethering MEF chromosomes to the micropillars, we investigated their folding stability using stepwise increases in the salt concentration (Fig. 4). During the experiments, the flow rate in the main channels was maintained at around 100 µm/s by a water head difference between the solution in the inlet well and the waste solution connected to the outlet of the device via a silicone tube. In our microfluidic device, the channel distance between the solution inlet wells and the positions of tethered chromosomes was approximately 7–8 mm. Thus, it is estimated that tethered chromosomes were exposed to the new conditions within 2 min after solution exchange at the inlet well, considering the effect of the diffusion of solutes.
When the salt concentration of the solution introduced into the device was increased from 0 to 0.5 M, there was no significant change in chromosome morphology. Slight shrinkage of the chromosome was observed upon exposure to 0.5 M NaCl for 4 min (Fig. 4a), which was presumably an artefact of fluorescence visualisation resulting from a decrease in the binding constant of the cationic fluorescent DNA dye YO-PRO-1 at higher salt concentrations34. Nonetheless, when the concentration was further increased from 0.5 to 0.75 M, the chromosome gradually swelled, and the length of the long arms increased over time (Fig. 4a, from 4 to 7 min). The swollen chromosome began to unfold and stretch under the influence of the solution flow, and 11 min after the introduction of 0.75 M NaCl, both long arms were stretched to ca. 150 µm, almost 30 times their initial length (in 0 M NaCl). This drastic conformational change occurred at 0.75 M NaCl in all successfully tethered MEF chromosomes (N = 14). It should be noted that MEF chromosomes whose results are outlined above were prepared in a slightly different condition from that of ES cell chromosomes as described in Method. When isolation of MEF chromosomes was carried out under the same conditions as ES cell chromosomes (cells were incubated for 1 h in the presence of demecolcine without Latrunculin A treatment and subsequently washed with 0.5% Triton X after bursting, as described in the Methods section), we could not obtain dispersed MEF chromosomes (as they clumped together). In an alternative experiment, we tried to investigate salt-dependent morphological stability using non-dispersed MEF chromosomes, i.e., chromosomes clumped together in micropockets. However, we did not observe changes in morphology or apparent size even when these chromosomes were exposed to 0.5 M NaCl in the micropocket. On the other hand, when the salt concentration was increased to 0.75 M NaCl, the chromosomes gradually began to swell, and the morphology of individual chromosomes became unclear (Supplementary Figure S2). Thus, considering the range of conditions tested in this study, we established that neither treatment with demecolcine (for 1–4 h), the presence or absence of Latrunculin A, nor treatment with Triton X (0.5–1 wt%) had effect on the critical salt concentration at which the unfolding of the MEF chromosomes began.
Additionally, at 0.75 M NaCl, non-uniformity of fluorescence intensity along the stretched chromosome was observed, suggesting differences in folding stability along the length of the chromatin fibres. In a separate experiment, we observed further unfolding and stretching of the MEF chromosomes in the presence of 1.5 M NaCl; the chromosome length reached ca. 630 µm, almost 90 times the initial value (Supplementary Figure S3). Moreover, the stretched chromosome exhibited variations in the degree of folding along its length. Considering that the contour length of genomic DNA for the shortest chromosome in mouse (chromosome 19) is ca. 21 mm35, the observed length of 630 µm indicates that the chromatin is still highly compacted (more folded, on average, than the 10 nm fibre chromatin structure).
According to earlier studies, most MBDs dissociate from methylated DNA in a 0.5–0.8 M salt solution36,37. In this study, using 0.75 and 1.0 M NaCl solutions, most chromosomes detached from the anchored antibody-conjugated microspheres and flowed away, although some remained tethered, even in solutions containing up to 1.5 M NaCl. This was likely due to the formation of multiple bonds between MBD-RFP proteins in the peri-centromeric region and anti-RFP antibodies on the microsphere, which created steric hindrance that prevented chromosome dissociation.
Folding stability of ES cell chromosomes
We examined changes in the higher-order structure of tethered ES cell chromosomes with stepwise increases in salt concentration (Fig. 5). Conformational changes, i.e., unfolding and stretching, occurred immediately upon exposure to the 0.5 M NaCl solution (This drastic conformational change occurred at 0.5 M NaCl in all successfully tethered ES cell chromosomes [N = 5]). This salt concentration was lower than that at which changes in MEF chromosome conformation were induced. In one representative case, contour length of the stretched chromosome was >700 µm (Fig. 5a, 0.5 M NaCl for 8 min), which was ca. 100 times the initial length. When the salt concentration was increased to 0.75 M NaCl, the chromosome stretched even further, to over 800 µm. Two strands of chromatin fibre from the long arms of daughter chromosomes were visible (white arrows), and bright fluorescent spots, i.e., highly folded regions, were distributed along the stretched chromatin fibres. However, since we were unable to distinguish chromosome number, we could not directly compare the differences in the distribution of fluorescent spots between stretched ES cell and MEF chromosomes of the same chromosome number. Nonetheless, ES cell chromosomes also exhibited variation in chromatin folding stability, although the sensitivity to the salt concentration differed between MEF and ES cell chromosomes.
Discussion
The folding of ES cell chromosomes was sufficiently stable for manipulation under flow (≤100 µm/s) with the optically-driven microtool in the presence of 100 mM KCl. It has been reported that arrays of reconstructed nucleosomes show a compact form under quasi-physiological salt conditions (150–200 mM NaCl) relative to the apparent size of complexes seen under lower salt concentrations (≤50 mM NaCl)38,39. This folding of reconstituted chromatin comes from a reduction in the electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged chromatin fibres38. This explanation can be applied to our experimental results, i.e., the observed stabilization of ES cell chromosome folding. Thus, by direct micromanipulation and imaging of individual native chromosomes in a microchannel, we confirmed the folding stabilisation of chromosomes by tuning the salt concentration. Whereas chromosomes from both cell types exhibited the same highly-compacted morphology in M phase (Fig. 3a, 3b), ES cell chromosomes were relatively less stable under high-salt conditions (Fig. 5) compared to MEF chromosomes (Fig. 4), even though ES cell chromosomes were prepared with the Triton X solution containing 100 mM KCl for morphological stabilization. It has been reported that the chromatin-binding protein heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) and histone H2B exhibit more hypermobility in mouse ES cells than in primary MEFs, as revealed by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments40. Moreover, there was no difference in FRAP recovery of histone H10-green fluorescent protein at any point in the cell cycle of mouse ES cells41. FRAP is powerful tool for investigating the turnover of chromatin-associated proteins in living cells42,43, although individual chromatin fibres cannot be distinguished owing to crowding within the nucleus. In addition, H1 and HP1 proteins in murine R1 ES, but not neural progenitor cells, were released at low salt concentrations41. These reports suggest that folding stability differs significantly between chromosomes from differentiated and undifferentiated cells and support our observations from single cell/single non-fragmented native chromosome-based experiments.
By comparing the degree of folding under 0.75 M NaCl conditions between MEF chromosomes (e.g., Fig. 4a, 0.75 M NaCl for 11 min) and ES cell chromosomes (e.g., Fig. 5a, 0.75 M NaCl for 8 min), it is likely that partially-unfolded MEF chromosomes maintained much higher-order folding structures than did ES cell chromosomes (for the comparison, an additional example is presented in the Supplementary information, Figure S4). This is consistent with previous findings which indicated that mouse ES chromatin shows greater fluctuations in spatio-temporal condensation within the nucleus than does MEF chromatin, which shows a more consistent distribution of chromatin condensation44. By single cell/single non-fragmented native chromosome-based experiments, we demonstrate that folding stability varies along the length of individual chromosomes, and that ES cell chromosomes exhibit greater stretching upon the replacement of a 100 mM KCl solution with one containing 0.5 M NaCl as compared to that of MEF chromosomes exposed to solutions with NaCl concentrations increasing from 0 to 0.5 M (Figs 4 and 5). Thus, ES cell chromosomes have more regions that may be easily unfolded, which may be related to the maintenance of a pluripotent state and their capacity to differentiate into any cell type.
In conclusion, we developed a method for investigating the distribution of folding stability along individual chromosomes at single-cell resolution without fragmentation. This system can serve as a powerful tool for evaluating the relationship between the progression of cell differentiation and changes in the distribution of folding stability along chromatin. Future studies will employ appropriate DNA sequence-specific fluorescence probes, such as dCas9-based probes45,46, to more clearly observe sites along tethered chromatin fibres and to discriminate between chromosomes, which will provide valuable information for epigenetic studies.
Methods
Cell culture and cell cycle arrest
Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and embryonic stem (ES) cells were obtained from a MethylRO mouse expressing MBD-RFP29. Details pertaining to cell culture can be found in the Supplementary Material. MEFs were incubated for 4 h in the presence of 0.2 µg/ml demecolcine (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), an inhibitor of tubulin filament polymerisation. Latrunculin A (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; final concentration: 2 µM), an inhibitor of actin filament polymerisation, and Hoechst 33342 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan; final concentration: 5 µM) were added to the cells, followed by incubation for 30 min. ES cells were incubated for 1 h in the presence of 0.2 µg/ml demecolcine before adding Hoechst 33342 (final concentration: 5 µM) for 30 min. Following cell cycle arrest, cells were collected, and the solution was replaced with 300 mM sorbitol containing 5 μM Hoechst 33342 (referred to as isotonic solution in this manuscript). The cells were then immediately introduced into the microfluidic device for experiments. It should be noted that the cell cycle of MEFs is about 24 h, whereas that of ES cells is about 12 h. Therefore, in order to increase the yield of M phase cells, the incubation time of MEFs with demecolcine was made longer than that of ES cells (in fact, even in the case of treatment with MEF for 1 hour, cells in M phase was obtained, but acquisition efficiency was very low). We empirically determined the use of Latrunculin A and 1 wt% Triton X solution (composition is described in the next subsection) was optimal for obtaining dispersed MEF chromosomes that could be micro-manipulated individually using optical tweezers. In fact, under the determined conditions we managed to obtain a few dispersed chromosomes per cell (others remained clumped to each other).
Antibody-conjugated microspheres, solutions for chromosome isolation, and investigation of structural stability
Antibody-conjugated microspheres were prepared as previously described22. Briefly, biotin-conjugated anti-RFP antibody (ab34771, rabbit polyclonal anti-RFP, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and streptavidin-coated microspheres (diameter: 6 μm; PolyScience, Niles, IL, USA) were reacted to obtain anti-RFP antibody-conjugated microspheres that were dispersed in Triton X solution. The obtained microspheres were evaluated by fluorescence-labelled anti-rabbit IgG antibody (described in the Supplementary Material, Table S1). The hypotonic solution used to induce cell bursting was composed of 5 μM Hoechst 33342 and 30 mM dithiothreitol (DTT). The detergent solution for lysing the burst cell membrane (referred to as Triton X solution in this manuscript) was composed of 1 wt% (for MEFs) or 0.5 wt% (for ES cells) Triton X-100, 20 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM DTT, and 0.5 µM YO-PRO-1. To investigate the stability of the higher-order structure of tethered chromosomes, Triton X solutions containing 0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, or 1.5 M NaCl were employed.
Chromosome extraction in the microfluidic device
Selective use of the three ports of the microfluidic device reduced the influx of cell debris into the two main channels. First, the interior of the microfluidic device was filled with isotonic solution, after which the cell suspension was introduced into inlet well #1 or #2 (indicated in Fig. 1a), and sucked into the main channels. After placing cells in M phase into the micropockets by optical tweezers, the inlet well from which the cells were introduced was sealed using a silicone rubber sheet with a thickness of 1 mm. This was followed by introducing an isotonic solution from the other two inlet wells to flush out excess cells from the main channels. Hypotonic solution was then introduced from inlet well #3. By closing the inlet well used to introduce cells, influx of cell debris was reduced. Usually, when the inlet #1 was used for cell introduction, the main channel #2′ contained less cell debris, and when inlet #2 was used, the main channel #1′ contained less cell debris. Using two ports helped to prevent backflow in the main channels during solution exchange. The problem with backflow was that it usually dislodged the chromosome-attached antibody-conjugated microspheres from the tethering slits or caused entanglement of the tethered chromosomes/stretched chromatin fibres. The loading solutions, e.g., high-salt solutions, were replaced in each inlet well one by one. This procedure of solution exchange restricted backflow within the microfluidic channels to branch channels between the inlet ports and main channels.
Experimental apparatus and conditions
The apparatus used for experiments, including an inverted fluorescence microscope (IX-73; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with a 100× oil immersion objective lens (UPlanFL N 100×, NA = 1.30, Ph 3), infrared laser for optical trapping (CW, λ = 1064 nm; IPG Laser GmbH, Burbach, Germany), and XY motorised stage (Sigma Koki Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), has been previously described23. A high-sensitivity charge-coupled device (CCD) (C9100-13; Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., Hamamatsu, Japan) was used to capture images of low fluorescence intensity and an electron bombardment–CCD (C7190-43; Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.) camera was used to obtain relatively low magnification images with a higher fluorescence intensity. All experiments were performed at room temperature (298 ± 2 K).
References
Johnson, A., Alberts, B. & Lewis, J. Chapter 7: Control of gene expression in Molecular Biology of the Cell, Sixth edition. (ed. Alberts, B.) 179–207, 369–373, 404–413 (Garland Science, New York 2014).
Kurimoto, K. et al. Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by Blimp1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Genes Dev. 22, 1617–1635 (2008).
Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
Kurimoto, K. & Saitou, M. Single-cell cDNA microarray profiling of complex biological processes of differentiation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 470–477 (2010).
Easwaran, H., Tsai, H. C. & Baylin, S. B. Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol. Cell 54, 716–727 (2014).
Henikoff, S., Henikoff, J. G., Sakai, A., Loeb, G. B. & Ahmad, K. Genome-wide profiling of salt fractions maps physical properties of chromatin. Genome Res. 19, 460–469 (2009).
Sajan, S. A. & Hawkins, R. D. Methods for identifying higher-order chromatin structure. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 13, 59–82 (2012).
Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
Park, P. J. ChIP–seq: advantages and challenges of a maturing technology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 669–680 (2009).
Kasinathan, S., Orsi, G. A., Zentner, G. E., Ahmad, K. & Henikoff, S. High-resolution mapping of transcription factor binding sites on native chromatin. Nat. Methods 11, 203–209 (2014).
Rotem, A. et al. Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1165–1172 (2015).
Sullivan, B. A. & Karpen, G. H. Centromeric chromatin exhibits a histone modification pattern that is distinct from both euchromatin and heterochromatin. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 1076–1083 (2004).
Maniotis, A. J., Bojanowski, K. & Ingber, D. E. Mechanical continuity and reversible chromosome disassembly within intact genomes removed from living cells. J. Cell Biochem. 65, 114–130 (1997).
Poirier, M. G., Monhait, T. & Marko, J. F. Reversible hypercondensation and decondensation of mitotic chromosomes studied using combined chemical-micromechanical techniques. J. Cell Biochem. 85, 422–434 (2002).
Aguilar, C. A. & Craighead, H. G. Micro- and nanoscale devices for the investigation of epigenetics and chromatin dynamics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 709–718 (2013).
Levy-Sakin, M. et al. Toward single-molecule optical mapping of the epigenome. ACS Nano 8, 14–26 (2014).
Hosic, S., Murthy, S. K. & Koppes, A. N. Microfluidic sample preparation for single cell analysis. Anal. Chem. 88, 354–380 (2016).
Gawad, C., Koh, W. & Quake, S. R. Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 175–188 (2016).
Rasmussen, K. H. et al. A device for extraction, manipulation and stretching of DNA from single human chromosomes. Lab Chip 11, 1431–1433 (2011).
Marie, R. et al. Integrated view of genome structure and sequence of a single DNA molecule in a nanofluidic device. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4893–4898 (2013).
Bauer, D. L., Marie, R., Rasmussen, K. H., Kristensen, A. & Mir, K. U. DNA catenation maintains structure of human metaphase chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 11428–11434 (2012).
Oana, H. et al. Non-destructive handling of individual chromatin fibers isolated from single cells in a microfluidic device utilizing an optically driven microtool. Lab Chip 14, 696–704 (2014).
Mori, H., Okeyo, K. O., Washizu, M. & Oana, H. Nucleosomes exhibit non-uniform unwrapping along native chromatin fibers with increasing salt concentration as revealed by direct imaging in a microfluidic channel. Biotechnol. J. 13, 1700245 (2018).
Duffy, D. C., McDonald, J. C., Schueller, O. J. & Whitesides, G. M. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal. Chem. 70, 4974–4984 (1998).
Luo, C. et al. A fast cell loading and high-throughput microfluidic system for long-term cell culture in zeroflow environments. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 101, 190–195 (2008).
Vrhovec, S., Mally, M., Kavčič, B. & Derganc, J. A microfluidic diffusion chamber for reversible environmental changes around flaccid lipid vesicles. Lab Chip 11, 4200–4206 (2011).
Oana, H., Morinaga, M., Kishimura, A., Kataoka, K. & Washizu, M. Direct formation of giant unilamellar vesicles from microparticles of polyion complexes and investigation of their properties using a microfluidic chamber. Soft Matter 9, 5448–5458 (2013).
Hayakawa, K. et al. Nucleosomes of polyploid trophoblast giant cells mostly consist of histone variants and form a loose chromatin structure. Scientific Reports 8, 5811 (2018).
Ueda, J. et al. Heterochromatin dynamics during the differentiation process revealed by the DNA methylation reporter mouse, MethylRO. Stem Cell Rep. 2, 910–924 (2014).
Ashkin, A. History of optical trapping and manipulation of small-neutral particle, atoms, and molecules. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 6, 841–856 (2000).
Martens, J. H. et al. The profile of repeat-associated histone lysine methylation states in the mouse epigenome. EMBO J. 24, 800–812 (2005).
Yamagata, K. et al. Centromeric DNA hypomethylation as an epigenetic signature discriminates between germ and somatic cell lineages. Dev. Biol. 312, 419–426 (2007).
Cram, L. S., Bell, C. S. & Fawcett, J. J. Chromosome sorting and genomics. Methods Cell Sci. 24, 27–35 (2002).
Petty, J. T., Bordelon, J. A. & Robertson, M. E. Thermodynamic characterization of the association of cyanine dyes with DNA. J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 7221–7227 (2000).
The Genome Reference Consortium Mouse Assembly Data https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/grc/mouse/data (2017).
Shiraishi, M., Chuu, Y. H. & Sekiya, T. Isolation of DNA fragments associated with methylated CpG islands in human adenocarcinomas of the lung using a methylated DNA binding column and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 2913–2918 (1999).
Bogdanović, O. & Veenstra, G. J. Affinity-based enrichment strategies to assay methyl-CpG binding activity and DNA methylation in early Xenopus embryos. BMC Res. Notes 4, 300 (2011).
Yoshikawa, Y., Velichko, Y. S., Ichiba, Y. & Yoshikawa, K. Self-assembled pearling structure of long duplex DNA with histone H1. Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 2593–2599 (2001).
Grigoryev, S. A., Arya, G., Correll, S., Woodcock, C. L. & Schlick, T. Evidence for heteromorphic chromatin fibers from analysis of nucleosome interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13317–13322 (2009).
Bhattacharya, D., Talwar, S., Mazumder, A. & Shivashankar, G. V. Spatio-temporal plasticity in chromatin organization in mouse cell differentiation and during Drosophila embryogenesis. Biophys. J. 96, 3832–3839 (2009).
Meshorer, E. et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell 10, 105–116 (2006).
Kimura, H. & Cook, P. R. Kinetics of core histones in living human cells: little exchange of H3 and H4 and some rapid exchange of H2B. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1341–1353 (2001).
Phair, R. D. et al. Global nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional genome scanning and dynamic interaction networks of chromatin proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 6393–6402 (2004).
Talwar, S., Kumar, A., Rao, M., Menon, G. I. & Shivashankar, G. V. Correlated spatio-temporal fluctuations in chromatin compaction states characterize stem cells. Biophys. J. 104, 553–564 (2013).
Ochiai, H., Sugawara, T. & Yamamoto, T. Simultaneous live imaging of the transcription and nuclear position of specific genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e127 (2015).
Deng, W., Shi, X., Tjian, R., Lionnet, T. & Singer, R. H. CASFISH: CRISPR/Cas9-mediated in situ labeling of genomic loci in fixed cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11870–11875 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grants [JP16H01319 and JP16K07099 to J.U.; JP25116005, JP26660250, and JP18H05528 to K.Y.; JP25286035, JP26116504, and JP17H02753 to H.O.]; the Takeda Science Foundation (J.U.); Kato Memorial Bioscience Foundation (J.U.); Asahi Glass Foundation (H.O.). Photography masks were fabricated using the electron beam lithography apparatus at the VLSI Design and Education Centre (VDEC), the University of Tokyo.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.T. developed the microfluidic device and performed the experiments with support from K.O. and J.U. J.U. and K.Y. developed the recombinant mice and prepared the cells. M.W. and H.O. conceived, designed, and supervised all the work. T.T., K.O. and H.O. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, T., Okeyo, K.O., Ueda, J. et al. A microfluidic device for isolating intact chromosomes from single mammalian cells and probing their folding stability by controlling solution conditions. Sci Rep 8, 13684 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31975-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31975-5
- Springer Nature Limited