Abstract
There is an urgent need to assess the effect of anthropogenic chemicals on model cells prior to their release, helping to predict their potential impact on the environment and human health. Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) have each provided an abundance of information on cell physiology. In addition to determining surface architecture, AFM in quantitative imaging (QI) mode probes surface biochemistry and cellular mechanics using minimal applied force, while LSCM offers a window into the cell for imaging fluorescently tagged macromolecules. Correlative AFM-LSCM produces complimentary information on different cellular characteristics for a comprehensive picture of cellular behaviour. We present a correlative AFM-QI-LSCM assay for the simultaneous real-time imaging of living cells in situ, producing multiplexed data on cell morphology and mechanics, surface adhesion and ultrastructure, and real-time localization of multiple fluorescently tagged macromolecules. To demonstrate the broad applicability of this method for disparate cell types, we show altered surface properties, internal molecular arrangement and oxidative stress in model bacterial, fungal and human cells exposed to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. AFM-QI-LSCM is broadly applicable to a variety of cell types and can be used to assess the impact of any multitude of contaminants, alone or in combination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
There has been an exponential increase in the release of anthropogenic pollutants, such as pesticides1, toxins2, pharmaceutical drugs3, personal care products4, microbeads5, and nanoparticles6, into our environment. The negative consequences of these contaminants are often discovered in hind sight since we currently lack appropriate tools to assess their effects at the cellular level7 prior to their release. It is therefore imperative to assess the impact of these chemicals, alone and in combination, on human health8 and the microbial environment9. New technologies to directly visualize cellular behaviour and processes (“cellulomics”) are continually being developed, ideally with the ability to study dynamic processes in live cells with minimal damage. The utility of any technique is augmented when combined with other methods. All microscopes, from optical to electron and surface scanning, have associated limitations that can be partially overcome by correlative microscopy: the correlation of data collected separately on individual microscopes or that from fully integrated microscopes during simultaneous imaging10. The physical integration of two or more microscopes into a single more powerful instrument to overcome individual limitations is becoming the new norm, ideally producing highly resolved images of biological specimens containing both structural and compositional information11.
Simultaneous multi-mode imaging using an atomic force microscope fully integrated with a confocal laser scanning microscope has interpretive value that is greater than the sum of its parts, offering wide spatial resolution ranges (nm-mm), high temporal (ms) resolution paired with sensitivity to local chemistry and functional analysis12. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images the surface ultrastructure and probes mechanical properties with nm- and pN scale resolution, respectively, and this is complimented by the optical sectioning capabilities, excellent temporal resolution and high contrast of confocal microscopy (CM) 12. AFM not only reports on cell surface ultrastructure and remodelling (topography), but can be used to map (adhesion) surface molecules13, or probe cellular integrity (viscoelasticity), all of which relate to overall cellular health, for example cancer progression14,15 and metastasis16. Since conventional AFM and CM are temporally17 and diffraction18 limited, respectively, and both are capable of studying live cells under physiologically relevant conditions, they make an excellent pair for physical integration and routine simultaneous correlative imaging. Integrated AFM-LSCM reports on spatio-temporal events with high sensitivity, from the cell surface to its depth, to provide unprecedented insight into intricate cellular events12.
AFM has been correlated with LSCM, including total internal reflection19, to identify viral binding events19,20,21 on live cells, mechanical stimulation22 and nano manipulation23,24,25 of live mammalian cells. The advent of super resolution optical imaging has also made correlation with AFM possible in live human cells26,27 with the potential for single molecule detection from each28,29. AFM integrated with inverted epifluorescence microscopy has been used to observe Candida-macrophage interactions30, and AFM-LSCM to view changes in morphology and viability for solvent exposed bacteria31. However, correlative AFM-LSCM has never successfully produced routine, high content data for live, actively growing cells, in particular bacteria32, to assess their response to environmental contaminants in real-time (Fig. 1). The quantitative imaging (QITM) mode of AFM collects force-distance curves at every pixel in a high resolution image, unlike the traditional method requiring two steps for high resolution AFM topography and then low resolution ‘force mapping’. This multiparametric mode produces force curves with information on height, surface stiffness and adhesion at each high resolution pixel. The absence of lateral forces facilitates imaging of biological and loosely attached samples, for example bacteria, as it reduces the probability of sample detachment33.
Herein we demonstrate for the first time simultaneous AFM-QI-LSCM imaging of living bacteria, yeast and mammalian cells responding to the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in situ, with the continuous monitoring of morphology, surface ultrastructure, mechanical properties, adhesion and tracking multiple fluorescently tagged molecules in real time. The novel use of this method to probe Escherichia coli, Candida albicans and HEK 293 cells in response to a xenobiotic during active cell division highlights the versatility of the method, with future broad application for assessing the impact of virtually any type of anthropogenic contaminant on most cell types.
Results
It was important to characterise changes to cell morphology, surface ultrastructure and physical properties under conditions favorable for E. coli proliferation to produce data relevant for assessing changes associated with exposure to stress. Actively dividing E. coli WM1074 were imaged by AFM-QI to produce time lapse images, showing every step of cell division, including cell elongation, initiation of constriction at the mid cell, extension of constriction and separation of daughter cells at high resolution (Fig. S1 and Movie S1). Following division, some cells detached, became planktonic and swam/floated away in the middle of imaging. It is to be expected that the Cell-Tak used to immobilize the parent cell during sample preparation is no-longer effective after multiple cell divisions, allowing for cells to become planktonic. At every step of the cell division process, Young’s moduli and adhesion could be extracted from the E. coli QI images, showing a spectrum of changes in elasticity (Fig. 2) across their surface. The center of the cell had a much higher elasticity (1–1.5 MPa) when compared to the “apparent elasticity” at edges (200–300 KPa) for all samples, regardless of the imaging media. The apparent elasticity is an artifact caused by the side of the tip contacting the steep cell edge, and possibly also a slight displacement of the cell as a result of imaging. E. coli surface adhesion, a result of tip-sample interactions, did not vary over cell division but varied slightly in different imaging media, with the highest adhesion to the silicon nitride tip observed in 0.01 M PBS and the least in pure LB (Table 1). There was no significant change in elasticity and roughness with media type, suggesting that dilution of the media had no significant impact on surface molecular organization. Cell division was slower (~2.5 h) in PBS, but approximately every 20 min in dilute and full strength LB, so diluting the media in half with PBS did not impact doubling time. Some cells detached and floated away after several divisions (Movie S1), but those that remained immobilized formed microcolonies through continuous division (Fig. S2), for which the surface properties probed by AFM remained the same.
WM2026 with FtsZ-GFP imaged by LSCM further confirmed active cell division, as denoted by a distinct dynamic Z-ring at mid-cell (Fig. 3A–E). Cell-ROX dye added to the WM2026 media, approximately 30 min before the addition of 1 mM 2,4-D, gave a ROS signal (Fig. S3) that was accompanied by loss of the Z-ring (Fig. 3F–J). AFM-QI-LSCM was used to simultaneously track the ROS and FtsZ-GFP signals, along with changes to surface adhesion and elasticity following the addition of 2,4-D. Further detail on the impact of 2,4-D in E. coli is described in our previous work34.
Using a similar strategy, AFM-QI-LSCM of C. albicans RSY150 co-expressing tubulin2-GFP (Tub2-GFP) and histone protein B-RFP (Htb-RFP) showed an increase in ROS within minutes (Fig. S3), but at much higher concentrations of 2,4-D, along with a significant reduction in surface roughness, and a two-fold increase in both surface adhesion or elasticity (Table 1). Even at 8 mM 2,4-D exposure, there was no significant change in tubulin2 or histone distribution (Fig. 4).
HEK 293 cells, over 7 µm tall, sometimes displayed noise as a result of interference between the top of the cells and cantilever holding the AFM tip. In the absence of 2,4-D, HEK 293 cells imaged by AFM-QI-LSCM had a smooth surface, a clear tubulin-GFP network, a distinct nucleus, and a very low intensity ROS signal (Fig. 5A–D) localized to the mitochondria. The addition of 1 mM 2,4-D directly into the imaging medium caused a slow loss of the GFP signal over 30 min, an increase in mitochondrial ROS signal within 30 min (Fig. S3) and no change in Syto 82 intensity or localization (Fig. 5L). After the addition of 2,4-D, the ROS signal, initially localized to the mitochondria, intensified in the nucleus within minutes (Fig. 5E–H). Exposure of HEK 293 to 2,4-D caused a complete disruption of the tubulin network, which delocalized throughout the cytosol, accompanied by a significant increase in adhesion, decrease in Young’s Modulus and roughness after 30 min. Cells shrank, became rounded, lost their normal extracellular protrusions (Fig. 5I–L) and detached from the surface after 2 h.
Discussion
We have demonstrated for the first time correlative AFM-QI-LSCM for the acquisition of nm-resolution surface ultrastructure, pN-scale nanomechanics and simultaneous localization of two and three intracellular signals in actively dividing bacterial, fungal and human cells in real-time (Fig. 1). Cells assessed for their response to 2,4-D exposure included a prokaryote (E. coli) and two different eukaryotes (the yeast C. albicans and human HEK 293 cells), showing the broad applicability of the method for assessing the impact of stressors in a wide range of cell types.
AFM QI mode is advantageous when imaging challenging biological samples that are soft and sticky, providing nano-mechanical and topographical maps of the entire surface33. QI enabled the imaging of loosely bound samples, for example actively diving bacteria that were detaching and becoming planktonic. We collected complete surface maps at various stages for actively dividing live E. coli (time lapse Fig. 2) over a period of several hours. Artifacts in height measured at edges are caused by collision between the sample and cantilever holding the AFM tip, and can be addressed by using thinner, very long (~7 µm) tips, even during high speed imaging17. The latter phenomenon combined with the Hertz fit, which assumes indentation of a completely elastic sample35, gives rise to apparent elasticity values at edges where there is not only indentation, but likely a slight displacement of the sample. There was no change in elasticity and adhesion during various stages of E. coli cell division, indicating that the cell surface composition at central regions remains relatively constant over the E. coli life cycle. Changes in tip-sample adhesion with imaging media relates to the differing ionic nature of the solutions. The greatest adhesion to the silicon nitride tip was observed in pure PBS due to a combination of increased electrostatic and steric interactions. Since the surface of the Si3N4 tip is zwitterionic-like36, adhesion to the highly anionic polysaccharides on the E. coli surface37 is enhanced by bridging, which is more prevalent at higher ionic strengths38. Adhesion, even when non-specific, is an important comparative characteristic that reflects the macromolecular arrangement of the cell surface which can impact important physiological processes such as biofilm formation and host cell invasion9,33,34,39,40,41.
To demonstrate proof-of-principle and dramatic responses during the correlative imaging assay, we chose E. coli exposed to the chemical stressor 2,4-D, which we previously showed to induce filamentation, ROS, the SOS response, cell envelope remodelling, along with the relocalization of components of the cell division machinery (FtsA, FtsZ)34. As expected, E. coli exposed to 2,4-D for 30 min had a higher ROS signal (Fig. S3), disruption of the Z-ring, changes to surface ultrastructure, elasticity and adhesion (Fig. 3), consistent with our previous study34.
C. albicans was selected as a test organism since yeast shares with E. coli an oxidative stress response to 2,4-D42,43, but adapts in a very different way, with halted, then slowed cell division, multidrug resistance, an increase in saturated membrane fatty acids44 and transcriptome-wide changes42. Indeed, we observed an increase in ROS for C. albicans exposed to 2,4-D, a remodelled cell surface with a two-fold increase in adhesion and elasticity (Table 1), along with a smoother exterior (Fig. 4). The latter is in contrast to the increase in surface roughness of C. albicans in response to cinnamon bark oil45, curcumin46, caspofungin47, all of which target the cell wall and initiate cell wall integrity pathways, flucytosine which targets DNA and RNA synthesis48, or the membrane targeted amphotericin B48. The unique cell wall remodelling with 2,4-D exposure likely reflects reorganization of membrane fatty acids and breakdown of the membrane permeability barrier in yeast44. We did not expect 2,4-D to alter the histone distribution in yeast, but possibly tubulin2 since 2,4-D disrupts tubulin polymerization in other eukaryotes49 and yeast tubulin2 is the structural analog to FtsZ in bacteria50. However, there was no change in the tubulin2 signal with 2,4-D, demonstrating the difference in eukaryotic responses and those between yeast and bacteria. Yeast such as Saccharomyces and Candida possess a thick envelope that likely prevent the entry of 2,4-D, changing its fate and consistent with the higher MIC51.
Cytotoxic 2,4-D leads to apoptosis in a variety of human cells, and in particular HEK 293 cells52,53,54. The addition of 2,4-D resulted in the loss of the microtubule network (Fig. 5), with the tubulin signal slowly fading away, consistent with prior studies showing 2,4-D disrupts microtubule stability in human lung cells50 and cultured neurons, and inhibits in vitro tubulin polymerization49. The appearance of smaller, rounder cells lacking extracellular protrusions, which led to detachment, indicates loss of the microtubule network during 2,4-D exposure also consistent with an apparent loss of cell elasticity indicated by the lower Young’s modulus (Table 1). Constitutive low levels of ROS in HEK 293 mitochondria is consistent with the byproducts of oxidative phosphorylation55. Post 2,4-D exposure, HEK 293 showed oxidative stress, with the ROS signal initially growing in intensity in the mitochondria and then appearing in the nucleus. This is all consistent with immediate uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria56,57, followed by an oxidative stress response which leads to a leaky nuclear barrier, and finally DNA damage58,59, which occurs more slowly as a result of nuclear mechanisms that protect DNA from oxidative damage60. Nonviable HEK 293 cells following the initial mitochondrial ROS burst are consistent with “ROS-induced ROS release” from adjacent mitochondria meant to amplify oxidative stress and promote cell death61, which would also explain the delayed nuclear ROS signal.
Simultaneous correlative microscopy demands the full integration of two or more microscopes, in this case atomic force and laser scanning confocal. Commercially available instruments are designed to be compatible, but need to be integrated in house. Pre-calibration and post-processing with the AFM software (JPK) has been developed to ensure that final images are in direct correspondence. Even for this fully integrated instrument with multiple detectors, the different time scales of each microscopic mode presented challenges for simultaneous imaging and required time syncing of images post processing (reviewed in12).
Software and user interfaces available for proper simultaneous AFM-LSCM measurements and image overlay are limited, with few improvements since Gradinaru et al. developed a home-built integrated atomic force and two-photon fluorescence instrument with single molecule sensitivity in 200462. High speed (HS) AFM17,63, lower noise systems with improved instrument integration and improved models to better interpret the results will further enhance the application of this technique. Biochemically modified AFM tips13 make it possible to map or stimulate single molecules on the cell surface while viewing the intracellular response by LSCM, ideal for studying cell signaling across the cell envelope and further multiplexing of the data. Fast three-dimensional super-resolution fluorescence imaging64,65, using fine-tuned66 fluorogenic probes for live cells67, shares the same time scale with HS AFM, which would allow rapid single molecule detection, albeit with a higher price tag.
The major advantage of using correlative AFM-QI-LSCM as a routine cellulomic assay is the generation of multiplexed data that reports on vital cell surface properties and virtually any internal biochemical signal from live cells in real-time. In addition to surface architecture, AFM-QI probes surface biochemistry and cellular mechanics, while LSCM offers a window into the cell using fluorescently tagged macromolecules. Tracking the response of three very different cell types to external stress demonstrates the broad applicability of the method, with the possibility of assessing the impact of exposure to virtually any type of stress (e.g. oxidative, ΔΨ, ΔpH) brought on by any number of contaminants (e.g. pesticides, personal care products, toxins), alone or in combination.
Methods
Strains and growth conditions
The E. coli parent strain, WM1074 and its mutant WM2026 with FtsZ-GFP, were kind gifts from Dr. William Margolin68. WM2026 and WM1074 were grown on lysogeny broth (LB) at 30 °C. WM2026 was induced with 40 µg/mL IPTG two hours prior to harvest. C. albicans RSY150 co-expressing tubulin2-GFP (Tub2-GFP) and histone protein B-RFP (Htb-RFP), a kind gift from Dr. Richard Bennet, was grown on yeast-extract peptone dextrose (YPD) medium at 30 °C69.
HEK 293 cells, a kind gift from Dr. Mohan Babu, were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle’s media (DMEM; Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS: Sigma-Aldrich), glutamine (2 mM) and penicillin (50 IU/ml)/streptomycin (50 µg/ml; Life Technologies). Cells were cultured on petri dishes for several passages. These cells were transferred to a petri dish with Cell-Tak coated coverslips and allowed to attach overnight. Cells were transfected with Cell Light® Tubulin-GFP reagent (BacMam 2.0, Life Technologies), at a concentration of 1 particle/cell according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and imaged after 48 h.
Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)
The MIC was determined as described previously for E. coli9. Briefly, an overnight stock culture was inoculated into a series of test tubes with 2,4-D over a wide concentration range (0.1–20 mM) and incubated for 24–48 h. The highest concentration of 2,4-D completely inhibiting growth, taken to be the MIC for E. coli9 and C. albicans, was used to determine an appropriate 2,4-D concentration for experiments at sublethal levels, with sufficient growth for correlative imaging. For HEK 293, a suitable 2,4-D concentration was selected based on Bukowska et al.70.
Sample preparation
Coverslips were cleaned with plasma (Harrick Plasma Cleaner, PDC-32G) or piranha solution as previously described9 and stored for up to 2 weeks at room temperature. A 30 µL aliquot of freshly prepared Cell-Tak solution (145 µL of pH 8 NaHCO3 buffer, 5 µL of 1 mM NaOH and 5 µL of Cell-Tak) was spread (1 sq. cm) onto the precleaned coverslip, incubated and rinsed. Prior to incubation of samples for imaging, coverslips were made sterile by rinsing with ethanol.
An overnight culture of E. coli (O.D600 ~ 1) was inoculated into 5 mL of fresh LB media and allowed to grow for 2–3 h (O.D600 ~ 0.4) to obtain culture at the mid-log phase. Approximately 500 µL of culture was added to the coverslip and incubated (32 °C, minimum of 30 min) in the dark. The samples were rinsed and imaged under PBS (0.01 M, pH 7), LB diluted 1:1 with PBS or in LB media alone. In all cases, the sample was rinsed thoroughly with imaging media and mounted with 500 µL of the same solution onto the AFM stage. The E. coli WM2026 imaging media contained 40 µg/mL IPTG. Media and PBS were sterile filtered (0.2 µm) and incubated at 30 °C for experiments. Coverslips were glued to the bottom of a custom made petridish using epoxy and placed in the JPK petridish incubator.
An overnight culture of C. albicans RSY150 was diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 and incubated 3–4 h in fresh media at 30 °C with shaking until it reached exponential phase (OD600 = 1). These cells were diluted (1:3) with media and incubated on the sterile Cell Tak coated cover slips at 30 °C for 30 min, allowing the cells to attach. Prior to imaging, YPD media was replaced by a solution of 1:1 YPD and PBS.
Transfected HEK 293 cells were grown onto Cell-Tak coated coverslips that had been glued to the bottom of custom made petri dishes and incubated for 48 h at 37 °C in the presence of 5% CO2. A nuclear dye (SYTO™ 82, 5 mM in DMSO; Life Technologies) was added to cells to a final concentration of 5 nM, incubated for 15 min and imaged immediately.
For all samples, Cell ROX Deep Red dye (Life Technologies) was added at a concentration of 5 µM, 30 min prior to the addition of 2,4-D. During experiments the sample was maintained at a temperature of 30 °C for E. coli, and 37 °C for C. albicans and HEK 293 cells.
Live-AFM-LSCM
Essential elements of the AFM-LSCM setup are shown in Fig. 1. The entire system is housed on a vibration isolation platform and in a home-built acoustic enclosure. Our AFM-LSCM setup consists of the Nano Wizard 3 AFM (JPK Germany) mounted on an inverted LSCM 780 (Carl-Zeiss) as described previously34. The custom designed AFM stage (JPK) was positioned in place of the LSCM stage and the sample mounted as described above. An additional camera, attached to the LSCM front port and connected to the AFM-ECU, produced a DIC image of the AFM tip, laser alignment and sample viewed from below. Initial viewing with the 20× objective allowed laser alignment and assessment of the distance between AFM tip and sample. A drop of the sterile imaging media was slowly placed onto the cantilever and allowed to slide onto the tip to avoid its sudden jump into contact with liquid, which can cause tip damage due to a rapid change in surface tension. The tip was lowered into the liquid, viewed with the 20× objective, positioned on a suitable point of the sample and the AFM laser realigned with the photodetector to optimize signal from the photodiode under fluid.
Subsequent viewing with a 63× oil immersion objective allowed the choice of a single cell which appeared immobile on the front port camera and confocal, but was engaged in cell division (eg. FtsZ-GFP ring at the mid cell for E. coli). Optical calibration (JPK software) precisely positioned the AFM tip in relation to the cell to generate optical overlay of the AFM-LSCM images. The spring constant of AFM cantilevers (Nanoscience, model no: HYDRA4V-100N), having a low nominal spring constant (k = 0.08 N/m), were calibrated (k = 0.05 ± 0.03 N/m in imaging media) using the thermal noise method71 prior to each data collection.
One challenge in live microbial imaging was to locate a suitable, actively dividing, but immobile cell for imaging by AFM. A force map at low resolution (20 × 20 pixel, 15 µm square) served as a guide for determining the location of cells with respect to tip position. Areas with high pixel intensity in the force map height image were centered and imaged at high resolution, and a very small field of view imaged by QI to obtain a complete map of Young’s moduli and adhesion values. Z-length, set point and imaging speed were all adjusted on the fly during QI imaging to minimise noise.
Thorough sample rinses ensured that the majority of planktonic bacterial cells were removed, but with an average E. coli doubling time of 20 min the imaging environment altered rapidly. The same cell could be repeatedly imaged, simultaneously with AFM and LSCM for 2–3 h, after which time image quality deteriorated from quickly dividing planktonic cells which obstructed cantilever movement and laser alignment. At this point, the AFM head was removed, the sample washed gently several times with fresh media, and imaging resumed as previously described. After replacement of the AFM head onto the LSCM stage, the optical overlay ensured that a cell of the same progeny, which after generations of division (several hours) often appeared as a mini colony (Fig. S2), could be selected for additional imaging. Since the collection of a single AFM image can take up to 20 min, AFM images of cells showed dramatic changes from one image to the next. The addition of fresh media every few hours ensured that cells had sufficient nutrients and that toxic waste was removed in adequate time. A similar approach for choosing a suitable cell was successful for both C. albicans and HEK 293 cells. Samples of the eukaryotic C. albicans and HEK 293 cells did not suffer from fast doubling times, overcrowding and planktonic cells as for the prokaryote E. coli.
A Z-length of 3 µm, set point 0.5 nN and an extend/retract speed of 100 µm/s produced high resolution images with the least noise in most cases for bacteria. The Z-length and set points were increased to 7 µm and 0.6 nN for yeast to accommodate their large height and stiff surface. Based on their relative fragility, HEK 293 cells were imaged with a Z-length of 5 µm and a lower set point (0.2–0.3 nN). Imaging time is affected by the Z-length, and the extend/retract speed. Confocal time lapse images were collected directly before, after and in some cases during QI imaging. Confocal imaging could be performed during QI imaging, provided all the confocal parameters were set prior to the start of imaging, as any mechanical movement of the confocal during imaging could cause the AFM tip to crash or produce large noise in the QI image.
Multicolor confocal images were obtained using the lambda mode and by selecting a suitable range of excitation wavelengths. The channels were later separated during image processing using the linear unmixing function (Zen Blue). ROS intensity was measured using the intensity measurement function for the red channel after subtracting the background intensity (Zen Blue).
The E. coli WM1074 was imaged by AFM-QI alone, while E. coli WM2026, C. albicans RSY150, and HEK 293-tubulin-GFP were imaged by AFM QI-LSCM (λex/em GFP; 488/510, RFP; 554/591; Cell –ROX 640/665, Syto 82; 541/560).
AFM-LSCM data processing
AFM and LSCM images collected simultaneously or at similar times were overlaid using Photoshop 11. LSCM images were processed for contrast and digitally enlarged to coincide with the AFM height image. QI force curves from each pixel of a force map (128 × 128 image) were processed (JPK software) using baseline adjust (adjust for deflection offset in the y scale), contact point adjust (offset adjust of x-scale) and a height correction to determine the vertical position of the tip derived from cantilever bending. Adhesion was calculated by subtracting the lowest point of the retract curve from the baseline and the apparent Young’s moduli, reflecting cell envelope elasticity, was estimated from a Hertzian fit of the approach curve (JPK software). QI data, only at the centre of the cells, was used for final quantification to eliminate edge artifacts that arise near the periphery. Surface roughness, measured from QI height images at the mid-point of the cell, has been described previously9. Force curves from QI images were batch processed according to Bhat et al.34. For each cell type, a minimum of ten cells from three biological replicates were imaged and analyzed. Each image (128 × 128 pixels) produced 16,384 force curves, however a small area (~200 × 200 nm for bacteria, ~500 × 500 nm for C. albicans and ~2 × 2 µm for HEK 293) at the centre of the cell was chosen to process force curves, excluding tip artifacts near the edges.
Histogram data was exported from the JPK software for statistical analysis and plotting. Data were statistically evaluated by unpaired student’s t-test and one-way ANOVA (Graph Pad Prism 5.01).
References
Novak, R. J. & Lampman, R. Hayes’ handbook of pesticide toxicology: Third Edition, (ed. R. Krieger) 231–256 (Academic Press, New York, 2010).
Helley, M. P., Pinnell, J., Sportelli, C. & Tieu, K. Mitochondria: A Common Target for Genetic Mutations and Environmental Toxicants in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Genet. 8, 177 (2017).
Carlsson, C., Johansson, A. K., Alvan, G., Bergman, K. & Kuhler, T. Are pharmaceuticals potent environmental pollutants? Part I: environmental risk assessments of selected active pharmaceutical ingredients. Sci. Total Environ. 364, 67–87 (2006).
Brausch, J. M. & Rand, G. M. A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 82, 1518–1532 (2011).
Wright, S. L. & Kelly, F. J. Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6634–6647 (2017).
Yang, W., Peters, J. I. & Williams, R. O. III. Inhaled nanoparticles–a current review. Int. J. Pharm. 356, 239–247 (2008).
Singh, N., Gupta, V. K., Kumar, A. & Sharma, B. Synergistic Effects of Heavy Metals and Pesticides in Living Systems. Front. Chem. 5, 70 (2017).
Hu, L. et al. The association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and organophosphate pesticides exposure: A meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 231, 319–328 (2017).
Bhat, S. V. et al. Oxidative stress and metabolic perturbations in Escherichia coli exposed to sublethal levels of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Chemosphere 135, 453–461 (2015).
Caplan, J., Niethammer, M., Taylor, R. M. II. & Czymmek, K. J. The power of correlative microscopy: multi-modal, multi-scale, multi-dimensional. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 21, 686–693 (2011).
Czymmek K. J. & Dahms, T. E. S. In Future directions in advanced mycological microscopy 143–162 (Springer, USA, 2015).
Zhou, L., Cai, M., Tong, T. & Wang, H. Progress in the Correlative Atomic Force Microscopy and Optical Microscopy. Sensors (Basel) 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17040938 (2017).
Hinterdorfer, P., Baumgartner, W., Gruber, H. J., Schilcher, K. & Schindler, H. Detection and localization of individual antibody-antigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3477–3481 (1996).
Babahosseini, H., Ketene, A. N., Schmelz, E. M., Roberts, P. C. & Agah, M. Biomechanical profile of cancer stem-like/tumor-initiating cells derived from a progressive ovarian cancer model. Nanomedicine 10, 1013–1019 (2014).
Andolfi, L. et al. Investigation of adhesion and mechanical properties of human glioma cells by single cell force spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy. Plos One 9, e112582 (2014).
Park, S. & Lee, Y. J. AFM-based dual nano-mechanical phenotypes for cancer metastasis. J. Biol. Phys. 40, 413–419 (2014).
Shibata, M., Watanabe, H., Uchihashi, T., Ando, T. & Yasuda, R. High-speed atomic force microscopy imaging of live mammalian cells. Biophys. Physicobiol 14, 127–135 (2017).
Hell, S. W. Microscopy and its focal switch. Nat Methods 6 (2009).
Trache, A. & Lim, S. M. Live cell response to mechanical stimulation studied by integrated optical and atomic force microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (44). pii: 2072, https://doi.org/10.3791/2072 (2010).
Alsteens, D. et al. Nanomechanical mapping of first binding steps of a virus to animal cells. Nat. Nanotechnol 12, 177–183 (2017).
Chaudhuri, O., Parekh, S. H., Lam, W. A. & Fletcher, D. A. Combined atomic force microscopy and side-view optical imaging for mechanical studies of cells. Nat. Methods 6, 383–387 (2009).
Lim, S. M., Trzeciakowski, J. P., Sreenivasappa, H., Dangott, L. J. & Trache, A. RhoA-induced cytoskeletal tension controls adaptive cellular remodeling to mechanical signaling. Integr. Biol. (Camb) 4, 615–627 (2012).
Harke, B., Chacko, J. V., Haschke, H., Canale, C. & Diaspro, A. A novel nanoscopic tool by combining AFM with STED microscopy. Optical Nanoscopy 1, 3 (2012).
Chacko, J. V., Harke, B., Canale, C. & Diaspro, A. Cellular level nanomanipulation using atomic force microscope aided with superresolution imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 19, 105003 (2014).
Chacko, J. V., Canale, C., Harke, B. & Diaspro, A. Sub-diffraction nano manipulation using STED AFM. Plos One 8, e66608 (2013).
Chacko, J. V., Zanacchi, F. C. & Diaspro, A. Probing cytoskeletal structures by coupling optical superresolution and AFM techniques for a correlative approach. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 70, 729–740 (2013).
Monserrate, A., Casado, S. & Flors, C. Correlative atomic force microscopy and localization-based super-resolution microscopy: revealing labelling and image reconstruction artefacts. Chemphyschem 15, 647–650 (2014).
Hell, S. W., Dyba, M. & Jakobs, S. Concepts for nanoscale resolution in fluorescence microscopy. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 599–609 (2004).
Hinterdorfer, P. & Dufrene, Y. F. Detection and localization of single molecular recognition events using atomic force microscopy. Nat. Methods 3, 347–355 (2006).
El-Kirat-Chatel, S. & Dufrene, Y. F. Nanoscale imaging of the Candida-macrophage interaction using correlated fluorescence-atomic force microscopy. ACS Nano 6, 10792–10799 (2012).
Kuyukina, M. S., Ivshina, I. B., Korshunova, I. O. & Rubtsova, E. V. Assessment of bacterial resistance to organic solvents using a combined confocal laser scanning and atomic force microscopy (CLSM/AFM). J. Microbiol. Methods 107, 23–29 (2014).
Lonergan, N. E., Britt, L. D. & Sullivan, C. J. Immobilizing live Escherichia coli for AFM studies of surface dynamics. Ultramicroscopy 137, 30–39 (2014).
Chopinet, L., Formosa, C., Rols, M. P., Duval, R. E. & Dague, E. Imaging living cells surface and quantifying its properties at high resolution using AFM in QI mode. Micron 48, 26–33 (2013).
Bhat, S. V., Kamencic, B., Kornig, A., Shahina, Z. & Dahms, T. E. S. Exposure to Sub-lethal 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid Arrests Cell Division and Alters Cell Surface Properties in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 9, 44 (2018).
Hertz, H. Ueber die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s Journal) 1882, 156–171 (2009).
Pezzotti, G. et al. Silicon Nitride: A Synthetic Mineral for Vertebrate Biology. Sci. Rep. 6, 31717 (2016).
Otto, K., Elwing, H. & Hermansson, M. Effect of ionic strength on initial interactions of Escherichia coli with surfaces, studied on-line by a novel quartz crystal microbalance technique. J. Bacteriol. 181, 5210–5218 (1999).
Rijnaarts, H. H. M., Norde, W., Lyklema, J. & Zehnder, A. J. B. DLVO and steric contributions to bacterial deposition in media of different ionic strengths. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 14, 179–195 (1999).
Bhat, S. V., Booth, S. C., McGrath, S. G. & Dahms, T. E. Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae 3841 Adapts to 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid with “Auxin-Like” Morphological Changes, Cell Envelope Remodeling and Upregulation of Central Metabolic Pathways. Plos One 10, e0123813 (2015).
Paul, B. C., El-Ganiny, A. M., Abbas, M., Kaminskyj, S. G. & Dahms, T. E. Quantifying the importance of galactofuranose in Aspergillus nidulans hyphal wall surface organization by atomic force microscopy. Eukaryot. Cell. 10, 646–653 (2011).
Dong, J., Signo, K. S., Vanderlinde, E. M., Yost, C. K. & Dahms, T. E. Atomic force microscopy of a ctpA mutant in Rhizobium leguminosarum reveals surface defects linking CtpA function to biofilm formation. Microbiology 157, 3049–3058 (2011).
Teixeira, M. C., Fau, S. P., Fau, F. A. & Sa-Correia, I. A proteome analysis of the yeast response to the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Proteomics JID - 101092707 5, 1889–1901 (2005).
Teixeira, M. C., Telo, J. P., Duarte, N. F. & Sa-Correia, I. The herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid induces the generation of free-radicals and associated oxidative stress responses in yeast. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324, 1101–1107 (2004).
Viegas, C. A. et al. Yeast adaptation to 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid involves increased membrane fatty acid saturation degree and decreased OLE1 transcription. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 330, 271–278 (2005).
Shahina, Z. et al. Cinnamomum zeylanicum bark essential oil induces cell wall remodelling and spindle defects in Candida albicans. Fungal Biol. Biotechnol. 5, 3-018-0046-5. eCollection 2018 (2018).
Kumar, A. et al. Curcumin targets cell wall integrity via calcineurin-mediated signaling in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 167–175 (2014).
El-Kirat-Chatel, S. et al. Nanoscale analysis of caspofungin-induced cell surface remodelling in Candida albicans. Nanoscale 5, 1105–1115 (2013).
Kim, K. S. et al. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of the cell death process in Candida albicans treated by antifungal agents. Plos One 6, e28176 (2011).
Rosso, S. B., Caceres, A. O., de Duffard, A. M., Duffard, R. O. & Quiroga, S. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid disrupts the cytoskeleton and disorganizes the Golgi apparatus of cultured neurons. Toxicol. Sci. 56, 133–140 (2000).
Erickson, H. P. Atomic structures of tubulin and FtsZ. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 133–137 (1998).
Simoes, T., Teixeira, M. C., Fernandes, A. R. & Sa-Correia, I. Adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, mediated by Msn2p- and Msn4p-regulated genes: important role of SPI1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 4019–4028 (2003).
Tuschl, H. & Schwab, C. Cytotoxic effects of the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in HepG2 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 41, 385–393 (2003).
Ganguli, A., Choudhury, D. & Chakrabarti, G. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid induced toxicity in lung cells by disruption of the tubulin-microtubule network. Toxicol. Res. 118.
Kaioumova, D., Süsal, C. & Opelz, G. Induction of apoptosis in human lymphocytes by the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Human Immunology 62, 64–74 (2001).
Murphy, M. How mitochondria produce reactive oxygen species. Biochem. J. 417, 1 (2009).
Zychlinski, L. & Zolnierowicz, S. Comparison of uncoupling activities of chlorophenoxy herbicides in rat liver mitochondria. Toxicol. Lett. 52, 25–34 (1990).
Kadenbach, B. Intrinsic and extrinsic uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1604, 77–94 (2003).
Provost, C. et al. Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in the nucleus revisited. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 88, 296–304 (2010).
Yoboue, E. D. et al. The role of mitochondrial biogenesis and ROS in the control of energy supply in proliferating cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 1093–1098 (2014).
Go, Y. M. & Jones, D. P. Redox compartmentalization in eukaryotic cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1780, 1273–1290 (2008).
Zorov, D. B., Filburn, C. R., Klotz, L. O., Zweier, J. L. & Sollott, S. J. Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced ROS release: a new phenomenon accompanying induction of the mitochondrial permeability transition in cardiac myocytes. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1001–1014 (2000).
Gradinaru, C. C., Martinsson, P., Aartsma, T. J. & Schmidt, T. Simultaneous atomic-force and two-photon fluorescence imaging of biological specimens in vivo. Ultramicroscopy 99, 235–245 (2004).
Ando, T. High-speed atomic force microscopy coming of age. Nanotechnology 23, 062001-4484/23/6/062001 (2012).
Jones, S. A., Shim, S. H., He, J. & Zhuang, X. Fast, three-dimensional super-resolution imaging of live cells. Nat. Methods 8, 499–508 (2011).
Chmyrov, A. et al. Nanoscopy with more than 100,000 ‘doughnuts’. Nat. Methods 10, 737–740 (2013).
Grimm, J. B. et al. A general method to fine-tune fluorophores for live-cell and in vivo imaging. Nature Methods 14, 987 (2017).
Lukinavicius, G. et al. Fluorogenic probes for live-cell imaging of the cytoskeleton. Nat. Methods 11, 731–733 (2014).
Geissler, B., Shiomi, D. & Margolin, W. The ftsA* gain-of-function allele of Escherichia coli and its effects on the stability and dynamics of the Z ring. Microbiology 153, 814–825 (2007).
Sherwood, R. K. & Bennett, R. J. Microtubule motor protein Kar3 is required for normal mitotic division and morphogenesis in Candida albicans. Eukaryot. Cell. 7, 1460–1474 (2008).
Bukowska, B. Effects of 2,4-D and its metabolite 2,4-dichlorophenol on antioxidant enzymes and level of glutathione in human erythrocytes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 135, 435–441 (2003).
Lubbe, J., Temmen, M., Rahe, P., Kuhnle, A. & Reichling, M. Determining cantilever stiffness from thermal noise. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol 4, 227–233 (2013).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. William Margolin for providing GFP and parental strains of E. coli, Dr. Richard Bennet for contributing the RSY150 co-expressing Tub2-GFP and Htb-RFP, and Dr. Mohan Babu for providing the HEK 293 cells, human cell culture facilities and for useful discussions on the manuscript. We are grateful to the University of Regina (UofR) IECS and Dr. Tzu-Chiao Chao for extended LSCM access, and Dr. Heiko Hashke for arranging a visit for SVB to JPK and for hands on training with live-cell AFM-QI. This work was supported by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant (228206-07) and Canada Foundation for Innovation Leader’s Opportunity Fund to TESD. SVB and ZS were partially supported by the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry scholarships, SM by a President’s Fund and TS was partially supported by the Faculty of Science, University of Regina.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.E.S.D. conceived the method, S.V.B., T.E.S.D., T.S. and S.M. designed the experiments, S.V.B., S.M., T.S., Z.S. and A.K. executed the experiments and analyzed the data, A.K. provided AFM trouble shooting expertise, S.V.B. wrote a first draft of the paper, T.S., S.V.B., T.E.S.D. revised the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhat, S.V., Sultana, T., Körnig, A. et al. Correlative atomic force microscopy quantitative imaging-laser scanning confocal microscopy quantifies the impact of stressors on live cells in real-time. Sci Rep 8, 8305 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26433-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26433-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Development of a novel multiphysical approach for the characterization of mechanical properties of musculotendinous tissues
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Concurrent atomic force spectroscopy
Communications Physics (2019)