Abstract
Zirconia ceramics exhibit a martensitic phase transformation that enables large strains of order 10%, making them prospects for shape-memory and superelastic applications at high temperature1,2,3,4,5. Similarly to other martensitic materials, this transformation strain can be engineered by carefully alloying to produce a more commensurate transformation with reduced hysteresis (difference in transformation temperature on heating and cooling)6,7,8,9,10,11. However, such ‘lattice engineering’ in zirconia is complicated by additional physical constraints: there is a secondary need to manage a large transformation volume change12, and to achieve transformation temperatures high enough to avoid kinetic barriers6. Here we present a method of augmenting the lattice engineering approach to martensite design to address these additional constraints, incorporating modern computational thermodynamics and data science tools to span complex multicomponent spaces for which no data yet exist. The result is a new zirconia composition with record low hysteresis of 15 K, which is about ten times less transformation hysteresis compared to typical values (and approximately five times less than the best values reported so far). This finding demonstrates that zirconia ceramics can exhibit hysteresis values of the order of those of widely deployed shape-memory alloys, paving the way for their use as viable high-temperature shape-memory materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The training dataset for the ML models used in this work is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5895143. Additional data related to this work are available from the authors upon request.
References
Swain, M. V. Shape memory behaviour in partially stabilized zirconia ceramics. Nature 322, 234–236 (1986).
Lai, A., Du, Z., Gan, C. L. & Schuh, C. A. Shape memory and superelastic ceramics at small scales. Science 341, 1505–1508 (2013).
Zeng, X., Du, Z., Schuh, C. A. & Gan, C. L. Enhanced shape memory and superelasticity in small-volume ceramics: a perspective on the controlling factors. MRS Commun. 7, 747–754 (2017).
Du, Z., Zhou, X., Ye, P., Zeng, X. & Gan, C. L. Shape-memory actuation in aligned zirconia nanofibers for artificial muscle applications at elevated temperatures. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 2156–2166 (2020).
Lai, A. & Schuh, C. A. Direct electric-field induced phase transformation in paraelectric zirconia via electrical susceptibility mismatch. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 15701 (2021).
Pang, E. L., Olson, G. B. & Schuh, C. A. The mechanism of thermal transformation hysteresis in ZrO2-CeO2 shape-memory ceramics. Acta Mater. 213, 116972 (2021).
Gu, H. et al. Exploding and weeping ceramics. Nature 599, 416–420 (2021).
Jetter, J. et al. Tuning crystallographic compatibility to enhance shape memory in ceramics. Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 093603 (2019).
Song, Y., Chen, X., Dabade, V., Shield, T. W. & James, R. D. Enhanced reversibility and unusual microstructure of a phase-transforming material. Nature 502, 85–88 (2013).
Cui, J. et al. Combinatorial search of thermoelastic shape-memory alloys with extremely small hysteresis width. Nat. Mater. 5, 286–290 (2006).
Zarnetta, R. et al. Identification of quaternary shape memory alloys with near-zero thermal hysteresis and unprecedented functional stability. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20, 1917–1923 (2010).
Pang, E. L., Olson, G. B. & Schuh, C. A. Role of grain constraint on the martensitic transformation in ceria-doped zirconia. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 104, 1156–1168 (2020).
Christian, J. W., Olson, G. B. & Cohen, M. Classification of displacive transformations: what is a martensitic transformation? J. Phys. IV 5, C8-3–C8-10 (1995).
Krauss, G. Martensite in steel: strength and structure. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 273–275, 40–57 (1999).
Bhattacharya, K. Microstructure of Martensite: Why It Forms and How It Gives Rise to the Shape-Memory Effect (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
Kelly, P. M. & Francis Rose, L. R. The martensitic transformation in ceramics—its role in transformation toughening. Prog. Mater Sci. 47, 463–557 (2002).
Wechsler, W. S., Lieberman, D. S. & Read, T. A. On the theory of the formation of martensite. Trans. AIME 197, 1503–1515 (1953).
Bowles, J. S. & Mackenzie, J. K. The crystallography of martensite transformations I. Acta Metall. 2, 129–137 (1954).
Mackenzie, J. K. & Bowles, J. S. The crystallography of martensite transformations II. Acta Metall. 2, 138–147 (1954).
Bowles, J. S. & Mackenzie, J. K. The crystallography of martensite transformations III. Face-centred cubic to body-centred tetragonal transformations. Acta Metall. 2, 224–234 (1954).
Ball, J. M. & James, R. D. Fine phase mixtures as minimizers of energy. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 100, 13–52 (1987).
Chen, X., Srivastava, V., Dabade, V. & James, R. D. Study of the cofactor conditions: conditions of supercompatibility between phases. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 61, 2566–2587 (2013).
Zhang, Z., James, R. D. & Müller, S. Energy barriers and hysteresis in martensitic phase transformations. Acta Mater. 57, 4332–4352 (2009).
Delville, R. et al. Transmission electron microscopy study of phase compatibility in low hysteresis shape memory alloys. Philos. Mag. 90, 177–195 (2010).
Meng, X. L., Li, H., Cai, W., Hao, S. J. & Cui, L. S. Thermal cycling stability mechanism of Ti50.5Ni33.5Cu11.5Pd4.5 shape memory alloy with near-zero hysteresis. Scr. Mater. 103, 30–33 (2015).
Pop-Ghe, P., Stock, N. & Quandt, E. Suppression of abnormal grain growth in K0.5Na0.5NbO3: phase transitions and compatibility. Sci. Rep. 9, 19775 (2019).
Liang, Y. G. et al. Tuning the hysteresis of a metal-insulator transition via lattice compatibility. Nat. Commun. 11, 3539 (2020).
Wegner, M., Gu, H., James, R. D. & Quandt, E. Correlation between phase compatibility and efficient energy conversion in Zr-doped barium titanate. Sci. Rep. 10, 3496 (2020).
Gopakumar, A. M., Balachandran, P. V., Xue, D., Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Multi-objective optimization for materials discovery via adaptive design. Sci. Rep. 8, 3738 (2018).
Chen, Y. et al. Machine learning assisted multi-objective optimization for materials processing parameters: a case study in Mg alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 844, 156159 (2020).
Kriven, W. M., Fraser, W. L. & Kennedy, S. W. in Science and Technology of Zirconia, Advances in Ceramics Vol. 3 (eds. Heuer, A. H. & Hobbs, L. W.) 82–97 (American Ceramic Society, 1981).
Lukas, H. L., Fries, S. G. & Sundman, B. Computational Thermodynamics: The Calphad Method (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
Saenko, I., Ilatovskaia, M., Savinykh, G. & Fabrichnaya, O. Experimental investigation of phase relations and thermodynamic properties in the ZrO2–TiO2 system. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 101, 386–399 (2018).
Wang, C., Zinkevich, M. & Aldinger, F. The zirconia-hafnia system: DTA measurements and thermodynamic calculations. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89, 3751–3758 (2006).
Park, J. et al. Thermodynamic assessment of the ZrO2-TiO2 system. Korean J. Ceram. 7, 11–15 (2001).
Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat. Commun. 7, 11241 (2016).
Trehern, W., Ortiz-Ayala, R., Atli, K. C., Arroyave, R. & Karaman, I. Data-driven shape memory alloy discovery using artificial intelligence materials selection (AIMS) framework. Acta Mater. 228, 117751 (2022).
Pang, E. L., McCandler, C. A. & Schuh, C. A. Reduced cracking in polycrystalline ZrO2-CeO2 shape-memory ceramics by meeting the cofactor conditions. Acta Mater. 177, 230–239 (2019).
Gu, H., Bumke, L., Chluba, C., Quandt, E. & James, R. D. Phase engineering and supercompatibility of shape memory alloys. Mater. Today 21, 265–277 (2018).
Chluba, C. et al. Ultralow-fatigue shape memory alloy films. Science 348, 1004–1007 (2015).
Bannister, M. J. & Barnes, J. M. Solubility of TiO2 in ZrO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, C269–C271 (1986).
Evirgen, A. et al. Relationship between crystallographic compatibility and thermal hysteresis in Ni-rich NiTiHf and NiTiZr high temperature shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 121, 374–383 (2016).
Miyazaki, S. in Shape Memory Alloys (eds Fremond, M. & Miyazaki, S.) 69–147 (Springer, 1996).
Kainuma, R., Takahashi, S. & Ishida, K. Ductile shape memory alloys of the Cu-Al-Mn system. J. Phys. IV 5, 961–966 (1995).
Maki, T. Microstructure and mechanical behaviour of ferrous martensite. Mater. Sci. Forum 56–58, 157–168 (1990).
Balachandran, P. V., Broderick, S. R. & Rajan, K. Identifying the ‘inorganic gene’ for high-temperature piezoelectric perovskites through statistical learning. Proc. R. Soc. A 467, 2271–2290 (2011).
Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 54 (2017).
Xue, D. et al. An informatics approach to transformation temperatures of NiTi-based shape memory alloys. Acta Mater. 125, 532–541 (2017).
Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Dissolving the periodic table in cubic zirconia: data mining to discover chemical trends. Chem. Mater. 26, 1985–1991 (2014).
Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics with vertical morphotropic phase boundary using Bayesian learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13301–13306 (2016).
Yuan, R. et al. Accelerated discovery of large electrostrains in BaTiO3-based piezoelectrics using active learning. Adv. Mater. 30, 1702884 (2018).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank S. Patala and C. Houser for useful discussions, as well as D. Schwalbe-Koda, J. Paras and H. Oh for preliminary calculations, which helped guide this work. This work was sponsored by the US Army Research Office under grant W911NF-21-2-0159, and in part by the US Army Research Office through the Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies, under cooperative agreement number W911NF-18-2-0048. This work made use of the MRSEC Shared Experimental Facilities at MIT, supported by the NSF under award number DMR-1419807. E.L.P. acknowledges support from the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program under grant number DGE-1745302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.L.P, C.A.S. and G.B.O developed the research theme and contributed to the design of the workflow. E.L.P. wrote all code, performed all calculations and conducted all experiments. E.L.P, C.A.S and G.B.O. analysed the data, discussed the results, made joint decisions about directions pursued and contributed to writing and reviewing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Dezhen Xue and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary text, figures, tables and references.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pang, E.L., Olson, G.B. & Schuh, C.A. Low-hysteresis shape-memory ceramics designed by multimode modelling. Nature 610, 491–495 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05210-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05210-1
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Design of Shape Memory Ceramics: Principles, Strategies and Perspectives
JOM (2024)
-
Realizing reversible phase transformation of shape memory ceramics constrained in aluminum
Nature Communications (2023)