Abstract
The bulk photovoltaic effect (BPVE) occurs when homogeneous noncentrosymmetric materials generate photocurrent or photovoltage under illumination. The intrinsic contribution to this effect is known as the shift current effect. We calculate the shift current conductivities of the ferroelectric SnTe monolayer using first-principles methods. Our results reveal a giant shift-current conductivity near the valley points in the SnTe monolayer. More remarkably, the linear optical absorption coefficient at this energy is very small, resulting in an enormous Glass coefficient that is four orders of magnitude larger than that of BaTiO3. To understand these giant shift-current effects, we employ a three-band model and find that they arise from the nontrivial energy band geometries near the valley points, where the shift-vector diverges. This serves as a prominent example highlighting the crucial role of band geometry in determining the fundamental properties of solids.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The study of bulk photovoltaic effect (BPVE) has a long history1,2,3, and recently it has attracted great renewed interest because it potentially allows the energy conversion efficiency to surpass the Shockley-Queisser limit4,5. The shift-current effects are believed to be the primary intrinsic contribution to the BPVE3,6. They offer an alternative to the photocurrent generated by traditional semiconductor p-n junctions7,8. It has been demonstrated that the photovoltage generated by shift-current effects can far exceed the band gap9,10,11,12.
The high priority of current studies in the field is to discover materials that have high shift-current conductivities. Cook et al. proposed principles for designing shift current materials using an effective two-dimensional model and successfully applied them to the monochalcogenide GeS8. In addition to conventional ferroelectric materials13,14, special attention has been given to Weyl semimetals because of the special topological nature of their band structures15,16. Ahn et al.17 theoretically studied the low-frequency properties of BPVEs in topological semi-metals and revealed the relationship between the shift current, injection current, and the quantum geometry of the material near the Weyl point. Recent studies18,19,20 indicate a significant potential for substantial nonlinear optical responses in layered two-dimensional materials, including BPVE and second harmonic generation.
In this work, we investigate the nonlinear optical properties of the two-dimensional ferroelectric material SnTe monolayer21 using first-principles methods. We find that it has giant shift current conductivities near the valley points. More remarkably, the linear optical absorption coefficient at this energy is very small, which leads to an enormous Glass coefficient of four orders of magnitude larger than that of bulk BaTiO31,5,22. We develop a minimal three-band model to analyze the mechanism of the giant shift-current effect in the SnTe monolayer. We find that the giant shift-current effects are induced by the nontrivial band structure geometry, where the shift-vector diverges at the valley point. We further show that the giant shift-current is related to the derivatives of the imaginary part of the quantum geometric tensor near the point. The mechanism is different from the previous works on the Weyl semimetals17, and therefore opens a play ground for the fascinating physical properties that are determined by the band structure geometries.
Results
Crystal structure
In 2016, Chang et al.21 reported that the SnTe monolayer exhibits robust in-plane ferroelectricity with a Curie temperature of up to 270 K, which is significantly higher than its bulk counterpart at 98 K. The SnTe monolayer has a hinge-like structure similar to that of phosphorene, as shown in Fig. 1, and belongs to the Pmn21 space group with mirror (Mxz) and glide mirror (G) symmetries. The in-plane ferroelectricity of the SnTe monolayer is oriented along the x-axis23,24,25,26. Due to its lack of inversion symmetry, the SnTe monolayer is expected to exhibit shift-current effects.
Band structure and shift current conductivities
We perform first-principles calculations to investigate the shift-current effects in the SnTe monolayer. Details of the calculations are presented in the METHODS section.
The band structures of SnTe monolayer with and without spin-orbit coupling (SOC) are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. There are four valley points of the band structure in the first Brillouin zone. Two valley points, k0 = (0.416, 0.0), k1 = (0.0, 0.415), are situated on the Γ − X line and Γ − Y line, respectively, in direct coordinates. The other two valley points are obtained by the time inversion symmetry of the aforementioned two k-points, namely \({\bar{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}_{0}=-{{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0}\) and \({\bar{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}_{1}=-{{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{1}\), as displayed in Fig. 1d. The band gaps at points k0 (\({\bar{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}_{0}\)) and k1 (\({\bar{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}_{1}\)) are 1.21 eV and 1.45 eV, respectively. The positions of the valley points are only slightly altered upon the introduction of SOC, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.
The lack of inversion symmetry in the SnTe monolayer results in a shift current, which is a nonlinear dc photocurrent induced by illumination1,2,3,
where σabc(0; ω, − ω) is the shift-current conductivity tensor, and a (b, c) = x, y, z are the crystal axes. As the SnTe monolayer is a 2D material, we do not consider the current in the z-direction, nor do we consider the electric field applied in the z-direction. Because of the mirror symmetry Mxz of the SnTe monolayer, only σxxx, σxyy, and σyxy = σyyx are nonzero.
The first-principles calculated shift-current conductivities3,27,28,29 are consistent with the above symmetry analysis. The 3D-like conductivities are obtained assuming an active single-layer thickness of 3.12 Å28,30. Although the results with and without SOC show some quantitative differences, the inclusion of SOC does not affect the main conclusions of this study (see Supplementary Fig. 3). Therefore, we only discuss the results without SOC here, and the analysis can be equally applied to the results with SOC.
Figure 2a shows the largest component of the shift-current conductivity tensor, σyxy, and the results for σxxx and σxyy are displayed in Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5, respectively. σyxy exhibits the highest peak at ℏω0 = 1.21 eV, with \({\sigma}_{3D}^{yxy}\) = 284 μA V−2. This value is significantly larger than the shift-current conductivity of the known high BPVE material GeS, which is of the order of 150 μA V−2, and the values of 250 μA V−2 reported in state-of-the-art Si-based solar cells28,30,31.
It has been suggested that a large joint density of states (JDOS) is necessary to have a large shift current7,8,28. However, surprisingly, we find that the JDOS at ℏω0 = 1.21 eV is extremely small, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. Consequently, the absorption coefficient α[110] is also very small around ℏω0 = 1.21 eV, as shown in Fig. 2b. It is noteworthy that the absorption coefficient αyy is zero at this energy, which is strongly counterintuitive given that σyxy is enormous.
The above results have significant physical implications. We compute the Glass coefficient1,7,9,27gabc = α−1σabc, and the calculated gyxy is shown in Fig. 2c. At ℏω0 = 1.21 eV, gyxy has a sharp peak due to the giant σyxy and small α[110]. The calculated Glass coefficient gyxy of the SnTe monolayer is 1.8 × 10−5 cm V−1 (ref. 30) at this energy, which is four orders of magnitude higher than g31 = 3 × 10−9 cm V−1 of the bulk (001)-oriented BaTiO3 crystal1,5,22. The Glass coefficient g plays essential roles in the shift current related physical properties. For example, the photovoltaic field generated by the shift current1,5 can be estimated as,
where ϕ is the quantum yield, ℏω is the incident photon energy and μ and τ are the mobility and lifetime of the carriers responsible for photoconductivity. A large value of the Glass coefficient g can result in a significant increase in the photovoltaic field Epv because, in such cases, the shift current dominates over the “leaking current” caused by photoconductivity. The photovoltaic power conversion efficiency is also closely related to the Glass coefficient1, where the maximum efficiency is \({\eta }_{\max }=g{E}_{{{{\rm{pv}}}}}/4\).
To experimentally explore this giant shift current effect, we could apply light with an electric field polarized along the [110] direction, and measure the resulting shift current along the y direction, which gives,
It has been shown that strong excitonic effects may further enhance the shift-current effects in 2D materials32,33. To enable the unambiguous detection of the shift-vector-induced effects while minimizing potential interference from other effects (e.g., the exciton effect), one may use laser energy that matches the band-to-band transition energy, which is typically much higher than the exciton absorption energy. Investigating how many-body effects change the shift-current in SnTe will be an interesting topic for future investigation.
Discussion
It is particularly interesting and important to explore the underlying mechanism of the giant shift-current conductivity and Glass coefficient in the SnTe monolayer. The shift-current tensor is given by3,
where fnm = fn − fm and ℏωnm = En − Em are differences between Fermi occupation factors and band energies, respectively. \({I}_{mn}^{abc}={r}_{mn}^{b}{r}_{nm;a}^{c}\), where \({r}_{nm}^{a}\) is the inter-band dipole matrix, and \({r}_{nm;a}^{b}\) is the generalized derivative of the dipole matrix, i.e.,
Here, \({A}_{nm}^{a}\) is the non-Abelian Berry connection. Although \({r}_{nm}^{a}\) and \({r}_{nm;a}^{b}\) are gauge dependent, their norm \(| {r}_{nm}^{a}|\) and \(| {r}_{nm;a}^{b}|\), as well as \({I}_{mn}^{abc}\) are gauge invariant28. Note that \({r}_{nm}^{a}\) and \({r}_{nm;a}^{b}\) and \({I}_{mn}^{abc}\) are all k dependent, but we drop the k index here for simplicity.
We calculate \({\sum }_{n,m}{f}_{nm}{{{\rm{Im}}}}\left[{I}_{mn}^{yxy}+{I}_{mn}^{yyx}\right]\delta \left({\omega }_{mn}-{\omega }_{0}\right)\) in the first BZ at ℏω0 = 1.21 eV. We find that the contribution only arises from the transition between the highest valence (v) band and the lowest conduction (c) band near the valley points k0 and \({\bar{{{{\bf{k}}}}}}_{0}\) as shown in Supplementary Fig. 6a.
Because only the valley points contribute to the optical transitions at ℏω0, the corresponding JDOS and linear absorption coefficient is very small. Furthermore, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 6b, \({I}_{vc}={{{\rm{Im}}}}\left[{I}_{vc}^{yxy}+{I}_{vc}^{yyx}\right]\), has a bright spot at k0, which gives rise to the giant shift-current conductivity.
Figure 3a shows the norm of \({r}_{vc}^{x}\) and \({r}_{vc}^{y}\) along ky passing through k0, represented by the red and blue solid lines, respectively. We observe that \(| {r}_{vc}^{x}|\) reaches a maximum at ky = 0, whereas \(| {r}_{vc}^{y}|\) = 0 at k0 due to the mirror symmetry Mxz. However, as seen from Fig. 3a, \(| {r}_{vc}^{y}|\) changes rapidly along ky around k0. One may speculate that \({r}_{vc}^{y}\) may have a large partial derivative in Eq. (6) along ky at the valley point. Indeed, as shown in Fig. 3b, \(| {r}_{cv;y}^{y}|\) exhibits a peak at k0. We plot Ivc in Fig. 3c. Interestingly, we find that \({I}_{vc}\approx | {r}_{vc}^{x}| | {r}_{cv;y}^{y}|\) around k0. Both \({r}_{vc}^{x}\) and \({r}_{cv;y}^{y}\) reach their maximum values at k0, leading to the giant Ivc.
To gain a deeper insight into the physics involved, we construct a minimal three-band model around the valley point k0,
up to the quadratic terms of δk, where δk = k − k0. More specifically, δkx = kx − 0.416, δky = ky. We therefore do not distinguish ky and δky below. In the model, the 1st band is the highest valence band, whereas the 2nd band and 3rd band correspond to the lowest two conduction bands in the DFT calculations. We fit the Hamiltonian matrix H(k) and velocity matrix vmn(k) from DFT calculations around k0. The fitted parameters of the model are given in Supplementary Information.
We first (numerically) calculate \(| {r}_{12}^{x}|\), \(| {r}_{12;y}^{y}|\), and I12 of the three-band model, and the results are compared with those from DFT calculations in Fig. 3a–c, respectively. The three-band model can reproduce the results of the DFT calculations semi-quantitatively, and the discrepancies can be attributed to the omission of other bands in the model.
Around k0, the three-band model can be analytically solved using second order perturbation theory, and consequently \({r}_{nm}^{a}\) and \({r}_{nm;b}^{a}\) can also be calculated analytically. Especially, at k0 we have \({v}_{nm}^{x}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})={{\mathbb{A}}}_{nm}\) and \({v}_{nm}^{y}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})={{\mathbb{B}}}_{nm}\), therefore by using Eq. (18) in METHOD section, we have
Because \({{\mathbb{A}}}_{12}\ne 0\), and \({{\mathbb{B}}}_{12}=0\), which is actually imposed by the mirror symmetry, we have \({r}_{12}^{x}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})\ne 0\), but \({r}_{12}^{y}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})=0\). This means that the linear (or direct) optical transition between the 1st and 2nd bands along ky is forbidden. Similarly we calculate the \({r}_{nm;a}^{b}\) of the valley point k0, and we have,
In the model, the value of \({r}_{21,y}^{y}\) (and therefore \({I}_{12}^{yxy}\)) depends mainly on the virtual transitions \({{\mathbb{B}}}_{23}{{\mathbb{B}}}_{31}\), which corresponding to the last term of Eq. (19) in METHOD section. The first term of Eq. (19) vanishes, because \({{\mathbb{B}}}_{12}\) = 0. This is remarkable that the linear (direct) optical transition between the 1st band and the 2nd band in the y direction is forbidden, but the nonlinear transition may occur because both the 1st band and 2nd band have strong coupling with the 3rd-band, which leads to the giant shift-current effect. This effect is quite different from that of the two-band models for Weyl semimetals17.
The giant shift-current effects in SnTe have even more profound origins. An alternative expression for the shift-current conductivity is written as17,
where,
is known as the shift vector, which characterizes the displacement of electrons in real space during the inter-band transition1,34,35. The shift vector is a gauge invariant quantity and can be viewed as a quantum geometric potential36. According to the perturbation theory, near k0, \({r}_{12}^{y}({{{\bf{k}}}})={f}_{4}\,{k}_{y}+{f}_{5}\,\delta {k}_{x}{k}_{y}\), where f4 and f5 are constants. In the model, \({A}_{11}^{a}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})=0\) and \({A}_{22}^{a}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})=0\) at k0, and both are small around k0. We can therefore neglect them in the following calculations. As k approaches k0 along ky, i.e., δkx = 0, we have,
i.e., \({R}_{12;y}^{y}\) is purely imaginary and goes to infinity. Therefore, k0 is a singular point for the shift vector \({R}_{12;y}^{y}\), which is a monopole in k-space. When ky is approaching zero, \({r}_{12}^{y}\) is also approaching zero as discussed in previous sections, and \({R}_{21;y}^{x}{r}_{21}^{x}{r}_{12}^{y}\) vanishes, but \({R}_{12;y}^{y}{r}_{21}^{x}{r}_{12}^{y}\) is still finite (actually very large) and purely real (Fig. 3). The introduction of SOC will not break the mirror symmetry, and therefore the above analyses remain valid. The shift vector would diverge at the valley points, as evidenced by Supplementary Fig. 3. Even after the introduction of SOC, the Glass coefficient at the valley points remains significantly large.
The shift vectors also play important roles in second harmonic generation17,37,38. It is therefore expected that the SnTe monolayer would have non-trivial second harmonic responses. The divergence of the shift vector at the so-called “optical zero” was discussed in ref. 39. However, the relation between the giant shift current and the divergent shift vector has not been revealed.
Very recently, nonlinear optical transitions have been related to the Riemannian geometry of the energy bands17,40. We may define the quantum geometric tensor between two bands m and n,
where \({g}_{ba}^{mn}\) is the band-resolved quantum metric, \({F}_{ba}^{mn}\) is the band-resolved Berry curvature, and the two geometric quantities are related to U(1) quantum metric and Berry curvature as \({g}_{ba}^{n}={\sum }_{m\ne n}{g}_{ba}^{mn}\) and \({\Omega }_{c}^{n}={\sum }_{m\ne n}{\epsilon }_{cba}{F}_{ba}^{mn}/2\)41,42.
In our case, we consider the transition between the 1st band and the 2nd band, and the quantum geometric tensor of the two bands is given by \({Q}_{xy}^{12}={r}_{12}^{x}{r}_{21}^{y}\). We have \({Q}_{xy}^{12}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{{{{\bf{0}}}}})=0\) because \({r}_{21}^{y}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{{{{\bf{0}}}}})=0\). However, we show that the partial derivative of the imaginary part of \({Q}_{xy}^{12}\) is related to \({I}_{12}^{yxy}\), i.e.,
Fig. 4a illustrates the distribution of \({{{\rm{Im}}}}[{Q}_{xy}^{12}]\) near k0 and its derivative with respect to ky is shown in Fig. 4b. \({{{\rm{Im}}}}[{Q}_{xy}^{12}]\) has a maximum (minimum) at δky = 0.05 (δky = −0.05) and δkx = 0, which is very similar to the Berry curvature distribution in Fig. 2a of ref. 26. Furthermore, \({{{\rm{Im}}}}[{Q}_{xy}^{12}]\) changes rapidly around δky = 0, and as a consequence, \({{{\rm{Im}}}}\left[{I}_{12}^{yxy}({{{{\bf{k}}}}}_{0})\right]\) has a maximum at k0, which is consistent with that from direct calculations.
We have demonstrated that the giant shift-current and Glass coefficient are directly induced by the divergent shift-vector near the valley points. Our three-band model has revealed several crucial requirements for achieving these effects. Firstly, the band structure should possess valley points located on a k-line with mirror symmetry, ensuring the divergence of the shift vector. Additionally, the structure should break the inversion symmetry within the mirror plane to have non-zero \({r}_{nm}^{x}\). Notably, there are numerous materials that meet these conditions, such as the MX family, including GeS, GeSe, GeTe, SnS, SnSe30,43, which exhibit similar properties.
In summary, our study unveils a significant shift current effect and an extremely large Glass coefficient in the ferroelectric SnTe monolayer. These effects stem from the divergence of the shift-vector near valley points, highlighting the influence of band geometry on nonlinear optical transitions. These findings present remarkable evidence of measurable physical effects arising from shift-vector divergence in semiconductors. They also offer valuable guidance in the search for materials with significant shift current effects, holding promise for their application in photoelectric devices.
Methods
Self-consistent calculations
The first-principles calculations are carried out with the Atomic orbital Based Ab-initio Computation at UStc (ABACUS) code44,45. The Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE) exchange-correlation functional46 is used. The ABACUS code is developed to perform large-scale density functional theory calculations based on numerical atomic orbitals (NAO)44,47 and supports for large-scale HSE calculations48,49,50. The optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt (ONCV)51 fully relativistic pseudopotentials52 from the PseudoDojo library53 are used. The valence electrons for Sn, Te are 4d105s25p2, and 4d105s25p4, and the NAO bases for Sn and Te are 2s2p2d1f and 2s2p2d1f, respectively47.
In the self-consistent and band structure calculations, the energy cut-off for the wave functions is set to 150 Ry. The Brillouin zone is sampled using a Γ-centered 16 × 16 × 1k-point mesh. The structure is fully optimized until all forces are less than 1 meV Å−1.
Shift-current conductivity
After the self-consistent calculations, the tight-binding Hamiltonian,
the overlap matrices,
and the dipole matrices (between the NAOs),
in the NAO bases are generated, where \(\left\vert {{{\bf{R}}}}\nu \right\rangle ={\phi }_{\nu }\left({{{\bf{r}}}}-{\tau }_{\nu }-{{{\bf{R}}}}\right)\) is the ν-th NAO in the R-th cell, and τν is the center of the ν-th NAO in the unit cell.
The dipole matrix \({r}_{nm}^{a}\) and its generalized derivative \({r}_{nm;b}^{a}\) in the shift current Eqs. (5)–(6) are calculated as follows3,8,28 (here we drop the k index for simplicity),
and
where,
The velocity matrix elements \({v}_{nm}^{a}\) are calculated by the ab initio tight-binding Hamiltonian Eqs. (15)–(17)54,55. The calculated shift-current conductivities and Glass coefficients are converted to effective 3D values, following refs. 28,30. More details can be found in Supplementary Information.
The band structures and the optical properties, such as the shift current are calculated using the tight-binding Hamiltonian implemented in the PY-ATB code56.
Data availability
All data generated and/or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
Code availability
The ABACUS code is an open source DFT code under the GPL 3.0 licence, which is available from http://abacus.ustc.edu.cn. The Py-ATB code, also under the GPL 3.0 licence, can be downloaded from https://github.com/pyatb.
References
Sturman, B. I. & Fridkin, V. M. The Photovoltaic and Photorefractive Effects in Noncentrosymmetric Materials (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1992).
von Baltz, R. & Kraut, W. Theory of the bulk photovoltaic effect in pure crystals. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5590–5596 (1981).
Sipe, J. E. & Shkrebtii, A. I. Second-order optical response in semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 61, 5337–5352 (2000).
Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519 (1961).
Spanier, J. E. et al. Power conversion efficiency exceeding the shockley-queisser limit in a ferroelectric insulator. Nat. Photon. 10, 611–616 (2016).
Nastos, F. & Sipe, J. E. Optical rectification and current injection in unbiased semiconductors. Phys. Rev. B 82, 235204 (2010).
Tan, L. Z. et al. Shift current bulk photovoltaic effect in polar materials-hybrid and oxide perovskites and beyond. NPJ Comput. Mater. 2, 1–12 (2016).
Cook, A. M., M Fregoso, B., De Juan, F., Coh, S. & Moore, J. E. Design principles for shift current photovoltaics. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–9 (2017).
Glass, A. M., von der Linde, D. & Negran, T. J. High-voltage bulk photovoltaic effect and the photorefractive process in LiNbO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 233–235 (1974).
Dalba, G., Soldo, Y., Rocca, F., Fridkin, V. M. & Sainctavit, P. Giant bulk photovoltaic effect under linearly polarized x-ray synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 988–991 (1995).
Yang, S. et al. Above-bandgap voltages from ferroelectric photovoltaic devices. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 143–147 (2010).
Alexe, M. & Hesse, D. Tip-enhanced photovoltaic effects in bismuth ferrite. Nat. Commun. 2, 1–5 (2011).
Bhatnagar, A. et al. Role of domain walls in the abnormal photovoltaic effect in BiFeO3. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–8 (2013).
Ogawa, N., Sotome, M., Kaneko, Y., Ogino, M. & Tokura, Y. Shift current in the ferroelectric semiconductor SbSI. Phys. Rev. B 96, 241203(R) (2017).
Osterhoudt, G. B. et al. Colossal mid-infrared bulk photovoltaic effect in a type-i weyl semimetal. Nat. Mater. 18, 471–475 (2019).
Ma, J. et al. Nonlinear photoresponse of type-ii weyl semimetals. Nat. Mater. 18, 476–481 (2019).
Ahn, J., Guo, G.-Y. & Nagaosa, N. Low-frequency divergence and quantum geometry of the bulk photovoltaic effect in topological semimetals. Phys. Rev. X 10, 041041 (2020).
Cheng, M., Zhu, Z.-Z. & Guo, G.-Y. Strong bulk photovoltaic effect and second-harmonic generation in two-dimensional selenium and tellurium. Phys. Rev. B 103, 245415 (2021).
Gudelli, V. K. & Guo, G.-Y. Large bulk photovoltaic effect and second-harmonic generation in few-layer pentagonal semiconductors PdS2 and PdSe2. N. J. Phys. 23, 093028 (2021).
Lihm, J.-M. & Park, C.-H. Comprehensive theory of second-order spin photocurrents. Phys. Rev. B 105, 045201 (2022).
Chang, K. et al. Discovery of robust in-plane ferroelectricity in atomic-thick snte. Science 353, 274–278 (2016).
Zenkevich, A. et al. Giant bulk photovoltaic effect in thin ferroelectric BaTiO3 films. Phys. Rev. B 90, 161409(R) (2014).
Wan, W., Liu, C., Xiao, W. & Yao, Y. Promising ferroelectricity in 2d group iv tellurides: a first-principles study. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 132904 (2017).
Chang, K. et al. Enhanced spontaneous polarization in ultrathin snte films with layered antipolar structure. Adv. Mater. 31, 1804428 (2019).
Absor, M. A. U. & Ishii, F. Intrinsic persistent spin helix state in two-dimensional group-iv monochalcogenide MX monolayers (\(M={{{\rm{Sn}}}}\) or Ge and X = S, Se, or Te). Phys. Rev. B 100, 115104 (2019).
Kim, J. et al. Prediction of ferroelectricity-driven berry curvature enabling charge-and spin-controllable photocurrent in tin telluride monolayers. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019).
Young, S. M. & Rappe, A. M. First principles calculation of the shift current photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 116601 (2012).
Ibañez Azpiroz, J., Tsirkin, S. S. & Souza, I. Ab initio calculation of the shift photocurrent by wannier interpolation. Phys. Rev. B 97, 245143 (2018).
Wang, C. et al. First-principles calculation of optical responses based on nonorthogonal localized orbitals. N. J. Phys. 21, 093001 (2019).
Rangel, T. et al. Large bulk photovoltaic effect and spontaneous polarization of single-layer monochalcogenides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 067402 (2017).
Pagliaro, M., Ciriminna, R. & Palmisano, G. Flexible solar cells. ChemSusChem 1, 880–891 (2008).
Chan, Y.-H., Qiu, D. Y., da Jornada, F. H. & Louie, S. G. Giant exciton-enhanced shift currents and direct current conduction with subbandgap photo excitations produced by many-electron interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e1906938118 (2021).
Gao, S., Liang, Y., Spataru, C. D. & Yang, L. Dynamical excitonic effects in doped two-dimensional semiconductors. Nano Lett. 16, 5568–5573 (2016).
Sturman, B. I. Ballistic and shift currents in the bulk photovoltaic effect theory. Phys.-Usp. 63, 407 (2020).
Jiang, J. et al. Flexo-photovoltaic effect in MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 894–901 (2021).
Wu, J.-d, Zhao, M.-s, Chen, J.-l & Zhang, Y.-d Adiabatic condition and quantum geometric potential. Phys. Rev. A 77, 062114 (2008).
Morimoto, T. & Nagaosa, N. Topological nature of nonlinear optical effects in solids. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501524 (2016).
Nagaosa, N. & Morimoto, T. Concept of quantum geometry in optoelectronic processes in solids: application to solar cells. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603345 (2017).
Fregoso, B. M., Morimoto, T. & Moore, J. E. Quantitative relationship between polarization differences and the zone-averaged shift photocurrent. Phys. Rev. B 96, 075421 (2017).
Ahn, J., Guo, G.-Y., Nagaosa, N. & Vishwanath, A. Riemannian geometry of resonant optical responses. Nat. Phys. 18, 290–295 (2022).
Gao, Y., Zhang, Y. & Xiao, D. Tunable layer circular photogalvanic effect in twisted bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077401 (2020).
Watanabe, H. & Yanase, Y. Chiral photocurrent in parity-violating magnet and enhanced response in topological antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. X 11, 011001 (2021).
Kaner, N. T. et al. Enhanced shift currents in monolayer 2d ges and sns by strain-induced band gap engineering. ACS Omega 5, 17207–17214 (2020).
Chen, M., Guo, G.-C. & He, L. Systematically improvable optimized atomic basis sets forab initiocalculations. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 445501 (2010).
Li, P. et al. Large-scale ab initio simulations based on systematically improvable atomic basis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 112, 503–517 (2016).
Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003).
Lin, P., Ren, X. & He, L. Strategy for constructing compact numerical atomic orbital basis sets by incorporating the gradients of reference wavefunctions. Phys. Rev. B 103, 235131 (2021).
Lin, P., Ren, X. & He, L. Accuracy of localized resolution of the identity in periodic hybrid functional calculations with numerical atomic orbitals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 3082–3088 (2020).
Lin, P., Ren, X. & He, L. Efficient hybrid density functional calculations for large periodic systems using numerical atomic orbitals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 222–239 (2021).
Ji, Y., Lin, P., Ren, X. & He, L. Reproducibility of hybrid density functional calculations for equation-of-state properties and band gaps. J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 5924–5931 (2022).
Hamann, D. R. Optimized norm-conserving vanderbilt pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013).
Theurich, G. & Hill, N. A. Self-consistent treatment of spin-orbit coupling in solids using relativistic fully separable ab initio pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B 64, 073106 (2001).
van Setten, M. et al. The pseudodojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table. Comput Phys. Commun. 226, 39–54 (2018).
Lee, C.-C., Lee, Y.-T., Fukuda, M. & Ozaki, T. Tight-binding calculations of optical matrix elements for conductivity using nonorthogonal atomic orbitals: Anomalous hall conductivity in bcc fe. Phys. Rev. B 98, 115115 (2018).
Jin, G., Zheng, D. & He, L. Calculation of berry curvature using non-orthogonal atomic orbitals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 325503 (2021).
Jin, G., Pang, H., Ji, Y., Dai, Z. & He, L. Pyatb: An efficient python package for electronic structure calculations using ab initio tight-binding model. Comput Phys. Commun. 291, 108844 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Grant Number 12134012, and the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology, Grant Number 2021ZD0301200. The numerical calculations were performed on the USTC HPC facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L. He conducted the project. G. Jin developed the computer code and performed the calculations under the supervision of L. He. Both authors analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, G., He, L. Peculiar band geometry induced giant shift current in ferroelectric SnTe monolayer. npj Comput Mater 10, 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01213-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-024-01213-w
- Springer Nature Limited