Abstract
A detailed knowledge of reaction kinetics is key to the development of new more efficient heterogeneous catalytic processes. However, the ability to resolve site dependent kinetics has been largely limited to surface science experiments on model systems. Herein, we can bypass the pressure, materials, and temperature gaps, resolving and quantifying two distinct pathways for CO oxidation over SiO2-supported 2 nm Pt nanoparticles using transient pressure pulse experiments. We find that the pathway distribution directly correlates with the distribution of well-coordinated (e.g., terrace) and under-coordinated (e.g., edge, vertex) CO adsorption sites on the 2 nm Pt nanoparticles as measured by in situ DRIFTS. We conclude that well-coordinated sites follow classic Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetics, but under-coordinated sites follow non-standard kinetics with CO oxidation being barrierless but conversely also slow. This fundamental method of kinetic site deconvolution is broadly applicable to other catalytic systems, affording bridging of the complexity gap in heterogeneous catalysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Heterogeneous catalytic processes are the foundation of the chemical industry. However, our ability to rationalise and predict the behaviour of these complex industrial catalytic reactions has been largely limited due to the significant complexity gap1 that exists between our fundamental understanding of catalytic systems and their application. Surface science experiments over planar model catalysts have been able to precisely resolve intrinsic catalytic kinetics and dynamic catalytic behaviour2,3,4,5,6; however, their application to real-world catalytic systems is often limited due to perceived pressure, material and temperature gaps7. These gaps are even more apparent in small (⪅5 nm) supported nanoparticle systems where the metals no longer retain their bulk-like properties and notable support-metal interactions can exist8,9. Therefore, a method of directly measuring intrinsic kinetics over complex multi-faceted supported nanoparticle catalysts is highly desirable.
As the rate of a reaction is defined by the specific geometric and electronic characteristics of an active site, we propose that measurement of an intrinsic rate constant (directly related to the free energy of the reaction) would be specific to a given active site. Therefore, a precisely resolved kinetic coefficient (or set of kinetic coefficients) can act as a parameterised representation of a given active site. CO oxidation has been utilised as a fundamental model reaction for understanding surface catalytic processes for decades4,10,11,12,13. In particular, CO oxidation over Pt catalysts has attracted significant attention due to its complex and dynamic surface chemistry, with the reaction generally understood to proceed via a Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism14,15. More recently, CO oxidation was used as a probe to study atom utilisation from nanoparticles to the single-site limit13,16. Due to the variations in physical structure with changing nanoparticle size17 and reaction environment18,19 understanding the catalytic role of geometric surface sites (i.e., structural-sensitivity) has been20,21, and still is22 of great interest. For example, the activity of Pt catalysts has been considered size-dependent for C − H bond activation in the methane reforming reaction23,24, but conversely their activity for CO oxidation has typically been regarded as size-independent15. However, the possibility of site-dependence for CO oxidation on non-reducible oxide-supported Pt catalysts was recently reported25,26 where through a combination of operando DRIFTS and steady-state kinetic measurements it was thought that different reaction kinetics for under-coordinated (UC) and well-coordinated (WC) sites exists on the metallic Pt surface. However, as the study was performed under steady state conditions their analysis was limited to simple reaction orders and apparent activation energies.
Non-steady state techniques such as Temporal Analysis of Products (TAP, see section: The Temporal Analysis of Products Experiment) are an effective way of measuring intrinsic kinetics as they can provide information about each sequential elementary step for the overall reaction. The TAP experiment serves to bridge the perceived pressure, material, and temperature gaps with the peak pressure during a pulse over the catalyst being on the order of 1 mbar27 (similar to other in-situ methods) and by using a packed bed microreactor (allowing powdered samples) which can be heated to the reaction temperature. As the pulse of reactant gas contains significantly fewer molecules than the number of reactive sites on the catalyst, a single pulse is not considered to change the surface significantly. However, by repeatedly pulsing it becomes possible to dynamically evolve the catalyst state using a technique known as chemical calculus28 making titration-like experiments extremely powerful29,30,31,32,33.
In this work we demonstrate that with the combination of TAP experiments, kinetic modelling, and in-situ DRIFTS measurements it is possible to precisely resolve site-dependent kinetics on working catalysts. We provide a detailed insight into the site-dependent intrinsic kinetics for CO oxidation over a well-defined 2 nm-sized Pt/SiO2 catalyst. Using isotopic labelling, we deconvolute the production of CO2 that arises from the reaction with preadsorbed 13CO* and from the adsorption/reaction of reactant 12CO in the gas phase under CO oxidation conditions. We identify two distinct kinetic features in the adsorbed 13CO*-driven CO2 production, which when combined with isothermal titration experiments are identified as two distinct pathways for CO oxidation. Regression of a kinetic model to the TAP exit flux curves was used to quantify the distribution of each pathway and calculate the intrinsic kinetics for the surface reaction of adsorbed oxygen with preadsorbed CO* as a function of temperature and coverage. Finally, by combining this data with comparable DRIFTS measurements, we are able to deduce site-specific kinetics as a direct relationship between the distribution of kinetic pathways and the distribution of well-coordinated (e.g., terrace like) and under-coordinated (e.g., edge, vertex) sites.
Results and discussion
Initial characterisation of pristine and CO*-covered 2 nm-sized Pt/SiO2 catalysts
Uniform and well-dispersed Pt nanoparticles were synthesized via a conventional polyol method (Supplementary Fig. 1) and were deposited on a SiO2 support with a concentration of 0.72 wt%. The average size and distribution of the nanoparticles was measured to be 1.82 ± 0.51 nm (Fig. 1a) on the fresh catalyst, and 1.94 ± 0.37 nm (Fig. 1b) over the spent catalyst. As no sintering of the nanoparticles occurred throughout the duration of the TAP experiments, we can directly correlate the catalytic behaviour to this narrow distribution of particles approximately 2 nm in diameter. The catalytic activity of the 2 nm Pt/SiO2 catalyst was tested under steady-state CO oxidation conditions (2.5% CO, 5% O2) with an apparent activation energy of 89 ± 3 kJ/mol measured between 130 and 160 °C, and reaction orders of \(-\) 1.02 ± 0.06 in CO and 1.22 ± 0.1 in O2 (Supplementary Fig. 2). These values match well with previous results over Pt catalysts with similar average particle sizes15,25,34,35,36, demonstrating that the Pt/SiO2 catalyst used in this work is comparable with ones reported previously, albeit with a narrower size distribution. Finally, we see excellent reproducibility for all TAP experiments performed in this work (Supplementary Fig. 3).
The fresh 2 nm Pt/SiO2 catalyst was loaded into a home-built TAP reactor37 and the catalytic activity for CO oxidation was measured by pulsing an oxygen rich CO/O2 mixture (1:2 molar ratio, 6.6% CO 13.4% O2) over a pristine and CO*-covered catalyst while heating from 25 to 350 °C at a heating rate of 8 °C/min. The 1:2 ratio of CO:O2 was chosen to allow excess O2 in the reactant stream to act as a titrant to sequentially remove the preadsorbed CO* to probe the catalytically activity as a function of CO* coverage. At 25 °C no conversion of CO or O2 and no production of CO2 was measured (Fig. 1c-(i)), whereas at 350 °C near 100% conversion of the CO to CO2 is recorded (Fig. 1c-(ii)). To simplify the comparison between the experiments, the exit flux curves for every pulse set in the experiment were integrated and normalised to the inert Ar tracer (Fig. 1d). The pristine Pt/SiO2 catalyst (Fig. 1d-(i)) shows a gradual increase in activity from 0% CO conversion at room temperature to almost 100% CO conversion above 100 °C. Similar reactivity for CO2 production between the heating and cooling steps was found indicating the catalyst state remains consistent during the experiment. However, the CO*-covered catalyst (Fig. 1d-(ii)) shows increased production of CO2 compared with the pristine catalyst. The excess O2 in the reactant gas mixture is able to react with the preadsorbed CO* and act as a titrant, sequentially removing the preadsorbed reactive sites with increasing temperatures. By 350 °C it is assumed that almost all of the preadsorbed CO* has either been reacted or desorbed off the catalyst surface as the activity during cooling was the same as that measured over the pristine catalyst. Interestingly, during the heating ramp the CO*-covered 2 nm Pt/SiO2 catalyst showed two catalytic features, with peaks in CO2 production around 100 and 200 °C. However, further experiments were required to precisely understand the cause for these two kinetic features.
Identifying pathways for oxidation of preadsorbed CO*
In an attempt to further rationalise the two kinetic features of observed in Fig. 1d-(ii), isotopically labelled 13CO was used to prepare a 13CO*-covered catalyst. This allows a precise deconvolution of the CO2 produced from the reaction of the 6.6% CO 13.4% O2 gas mixture over the catalyst (m/z = 44) and the CO2 produced from the reaction of O2 with preadsorbed 13CO* (m/z = 45). The heating rate experiment was repeated on the 13CO-covered Pt/SiO2 catalyst under the exact same conditions as used in Fig. 1d-(ii). Interestingly, the reaction of gas phase CO and O2 with the catalyst (Fig. 2, red triangles) was similar to that measured over the pristine catalyst whereas the preadsorbed 13CO*-driven CO2 production (Fig. 2, orange circles) shows two well-defined kinetic features around 100 and 200 °C. The total CO2 production (12CO2 + 13CO2, Fig. 2, black circles) also matched well with the CO2 measured in Fig. 1d-(ii). As in other temperature programmed techniques such as Temporal Programmed Oxidation (TPO), the two peaks in the measured signal would indicate two different kinetic pathways (often prescribed to different sites) for the oxidation of preadsorbed CO with gas phase O2.
To directly probe the kinetic features at 100 and 200 °C, isothermal O2 titration experiments were carried out. First, CO was pulsed over the catalyst at the reaction temperature until it was saturated with adsorbed CO*. Then, the preadsorbed CO* was titrated off sequentially with a series of O2 pulses. This affords calculation of the apparent rate constant for the oxidation of CO* as a function of CO coverage30,33. In the first few pulses ~100% conversion of O2 is observed at both temperatures (Fig. 3-left). Then, as O2 is repeatedly pulsed, the CO2 production decreases, and the exit flux of O2 increases up to the saturation state on the Pt surface, confirming that complete removal of the reactive CO* occurs. To estimate the kinetics of the preadsorbed CO* consumption, we plot the temperature corrected apparent rate constant as a function of cumulative CO2 produced (indicative of CO* coverage) in Fig. 3a, b-right, which is calculated using30:
Where \({{k{{\hbox{'}}}}}_{{app}}\) is the temperature corrected apparent rate constant, \(X\) is the fractional O2 conversion, \(T\) is the temperature (K), \({k}_{{app}}\) is the apparent rate constant (s−1), \({k}_{a}\) is the intrinsic rate constant for the reaction of O2 with preadsorbed CO*, and \({\theta }_{{{CO}}^{*}}\) is the coverage of preadsorbed CO*. On account of the usage of the same catalyst bed throughout all the pulse experiments, variations in kapp show a direct correlation to the intrinsic rate constant for the O2 titration experiment38,39. Specifically, a linearly decrease in \({k}_{{app}}\) with \({\theta }_{{{CO}}^{*}}\) (or CO2 produced) indicates the presence of a unique intrinsic rate constants (ka) for the reaction of O2 with CO* through the following relationship30,40:
Where \(\varepsilon\) is the void fraction of the packed bed, and V is volume of the catalyst zone. We identify two linear regimes for the reaction of O2 with preadsorbed CO* in both isothermal titration experiments (Fig. 3, yellow line), indicating that two intrinsic rate constants, and as such two pathways exist simultaneously at both temperatures. We identify a slow and fast intrinsic reaction rate for CO2 production, as shown by the gradients in Fig. 3-right. At high relative coverage of CO* the fast pathway dominates, at lower CO* coverages the slow pathway dominates during the titration experiment. Coupling this insight with the two kinetic regimes seen in the temperature programmed experiments, we feel confident in claiming that at least two different pathways for the oxidation of CO* by O2 exist on the 2 nm Pt/SiO2 catalyst.
Quantifying active species using MZTRT and DRIFTS
Due to its well-defined nature, it is possible to precisely resolve the intrinsic kinetics of catalytic processes using the TAP experiment39,41. For linear (first order or pseudo first order) reactions Multi-Zone TAP Reactor Theory42,43 (MZTRT) is a powerful and efficient tool for simulating TAP exit flux responses. The model of the experiment was built using the generalised form of MZTRT (see Supplementary I and Supplementary Dataset 1) with the Symmetric Thin-Zone assumption applied to the catalyst zone39. For the reaction of oxygen with preadsorbed CO*, a three-pathway model was identified as the most likely candidate (see Supplementary II; Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 4). The experimental results for two catalytic features (CO2 production around 100 and 200 °C in Fig. 2) and two kinetic regimes (two pathways for the reaction of O2 in Fig. 3) would indicate two separate pathways for oxidation of CO*. As the oxygen balance (i.e., oxygen released as CO2 / oxygen consumed) is not always 1 throughout the experiment a third pathway of irreversible oxygen adsorption is necessary in the model. It is very important to note that the model regression is performed on each set of exit flux curves individually (Fig. 4b) with the model fit to both the shape and magnitude of Ar, O2, and CO2 exit flux curves. The kinetic model can be broken down into two parts. First, the apparent adsorption rate constants \({k}_{a,1}^{{\prime} }\) and \({k}_{a,2}^{{\prime} }\) represent the irreversible adsorption and subsequent reaction of gaseous O2 with preabsorbed CO*, and the adsorption rate constant \({k}_{a,3}^{{\prime} }\) represents the irreversible adsorption of O2 to sites where no further reaction with CO* takes place. Second, the intrinsic rate constants \({k}_{r,1}\) and \({k}_{r,2}\) represent the rate at which the surface reaction between adsorbed oxygen and CO* occurs for pathways 1 and 2, respectively. In short, the adsorption constants \({k}_{a}^{{\prime} }\) control the magnitude of the O2 and CO2 exit flux curves, whereas the surface reaction constants \({k}_{r}\) control the shape. As each pulse set is regressed individually during the isothermal O2 titration experiment (Fig. 4c), a set of rate constants for the reaction of oxygen with preadsorbed CO* can be calculated at each point (Fig. 4d). Models of varying complexity were tested, but only the three-pathway model was able to precisely recreate the experimental data without being overparameterised (see Supplementary II; Supplementary Fig. 5). The model fitting exhibits a high degree of confidence and consistency with all TAP experiments in this work, although decreased confidence in the intrinsic surface reaction constants is observed at the limit of very low CO2 production.
To rationalise if the two pathways for oxidation of the preadsorbed CO* were correlated to the geometric structure of metallic Pt sites (e.g., terrace, edge, vertex sites) on the 2 nm nanoparticles, a series of DRIFTS and TPO experiments were performed where CO was preadsorbed at 25–350 °C (Fig. 5). In general, it is known that the binding energy for adsorbed CO on the under-coordinated (UC) sites (e.g., edge, vertex sites) is higher than that on the well-coordinated (WC) sites (e.g., terrace sites). This implies that when CO is adsorbed at higher temperatures, an increase in populated UC sites relative to the populated WC sites would be expected44.
From the DRIFTS investigation in Fig. 5a, it is shown that the pre-adsorption of CO at 35, 100, 200, and 350 °C (35CO, 100CO, 200CO, 350CO, respectively) populates linear bound CO to WC sites, UC sites, and multi-bound CO as evidenced by three ν(C − O) bands (Fig. 5a, b features 1-3). The 35CO yields ν(C − O) bands centred at 2075 cm−1 with a small high frequency shoulder (feature 1), a small band near 2042 cm−1 (feature 2), and a broad band at 1805 cm−1 (feature 3). Increasing the adsorption temperature to 100 °C causes a slight decrease in the intensity of feature 1 and a shift in features 2 and 3 to lower frequency. For the 200CO and 350CO, there is a dramatic decrease in the intensity and slight shift to lower frequency of feature 1. The decrease in the intensity is attributed to the reduction of the total number of adsorbed CO* with increasing temperature. In turn the surface is predominantly relatively strongly bound CO on UC sites. A larger shift to lower frequency of features 2 and 3 is observed, which clarifies feature 2 as a distinct peak from feature 1. The position of the ν(C − O) frequencies as a function of CO adsorption temperature are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Feature 1 with a peak maximum from 2075 to 2052 cm−1 is assigned to the collective oscillation of linear bound CO to WC sites (linear WC) where the high frequency shoulder is attributed to a dense CO phase for high CO coverages. Feature 2 with a peak maximum from 2042 to 1970 cm−1 is assigned to the collective oscillation of linear CO to UC sites (linear UC). The frequency of the ν(C − O) for linear CO on the 2 nm Pt nanoparticles catalyst is in agreement with previous investigations when considering the frequency is dependent on the CO coverage25,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55, Pt coordination environment25,34,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61, and nanoparticle size25,55,56,57,58,59. Feature 3 with a peak maximum from 1805 to 1701 cm−1 is assigned to the collective oscillation of multi-bound CO to Pt sites and is also in reasonable agreement with previous work47,48,49,50,51,52,62,63,64,65,66. In contrast to the linear CO vibrational features, the identification of unique multi-bound CO features for different Pt coordination environments was not possible. The CO* adsorption site information from the DRIFTS analysis is graphically summarised in Fig. 5b.
Alongside the DRIFTS investigation, comparable TPO experiments were performed where CO* was preadsorbed at temperatures from 25 to 350 °C and was titrated using O2 pulses while heating from 25 to 350 °C at 8 °C/min (Fig. 5c). Interestingly, the 25CO TPO shows an onset temperature for CO2 production at around 40 °C, whereas the TPO results of both 100CO and 200CO show 10-20 times higher CO2 production at 40 °C. It is believed that when CO is preadsorbed at 25 °C the surface is fully covered in CO* meaning there are no vacant sites for adsorption/dissociation of O2 (i.e., CO poisoning). We prescribe the increased activity for CO2 production in the 100CO and 200CO TPO experiments to the increased number of vacant sites on the partially CO*-covered surface. This is supported by an additional TPO experiment where CO is pulsed to saturation over the 100CO catalyst at 25 °C. The 100CO + 25CO TPO experiment shows similar tendency to that of 25CO (Supplementary Fig. 6), which implies that the low temperature CO2 production at 25 °C is vacancy driven. Further, isothermal titration experiments performed at 25 °C show no CO2 production (Supplementary Fig. 7). When combined, this would indicate that CO2 production by oxidation of preadsorbed CO* is driven by a Langmuir-Hinshelwood type reaction (as is expected for CO oxidation over Pt)14,15. However, we cannot rule out other methods such as CO* assisted O2 dissociation15. Interestingly, the low-temperature oxidation of preadsorbed CO* would indicate that the Langmuir-Hinshelwood surface reaction between oxygen and CO* over 2 nm Pt nanoparticles has a very low activation barrier, which is counter to previous work on single crystals and supported Pt catalysts with activation energies ranging from 37 to 85 kJ/mol15,35,67,68.
Similar to the isotopically labelled experiments, two kinetic features are observed: a spike around 80 °C (first feature) and a long shoulder from 100 to 350 °C (second feature) appear in the 25CO TPO. The first kinetic feature appears at low temperatures (\( < \) 50 °C) in both the 100CO and 200CO which we ascribe to the low-temperature CO* conversion mentioned above. Due to decreasing CO* coverage throughout the titration experiment, the CO2 production would be expected to decrease. However, in the 100CO experiment a distinct second catalytic feature appears around 125 °C, which suggests the presence of temperature-dependent kinetics. Further, the second catalytic feature disappears as the adsorption temperature increases from 100 to 200 °C, which corresponds to the large decrease in WC sites from the DRIFTS results in Fig. 5a. This strongly suggests that site dependent kinetics does exist for the oxidation of CO* over SiO2-supported 2 nm Pt nanoparticles.
To calculate the intrinsic kinetics at each point in the TPO experiments, the rate constants for the model in Fig. 4a were calculated by regressing the MZTRT Symmetric Thin-Zone model to every pulse set in the experiments. All rate constants for the 25CO, 100CO, 200CO, and 350CO TPO experiments are shown in Supplementary Fig. 8. Also, the MATLAB script used to process the 25CO TPO experiment is included alongside the Supplementary Information. As during the TAP experiment the pulse size is sufficiently small that coverage of CO* species is not changed by any appreciable amount during a pulse, the first order irreversible adsorption rate constants \({k}_{a,1}^{{\prime} }\) and \({k}_{a,2}^{{\prime} }\) are pseudo first order and are proportional to the concentration of the adsorbed CO* species involved in each pathway (\({k}_{a,3}^{{\prime} }\) would be proportional to the number of empty sites). This means that it becomes possible to deconvolute the amount of CO2 produced from each pathway as shown in in Fig. 5d–g. From the MZTRT Symmetric Thin-Zone model, the conversion of O2 in each pulse set can be calculated using39,69:
Where \({X}_{{O}_{2}}\) conversion of the reactant, \({D}_{e}^{R}\) is the diffusivity of the reactant (cm2/cm3), \(L\) is the length of the catalyst bed (cm), and \({k}_{a,n}^{{\prime} }\) represents the apparent pseudo-first order adsorption/reaction constant for each individual site included in the model (cm s−1) and is the parameter that is calculated during the model fitting. The apparent pseudo-first order adsorption/reaction constant is linearly related to the intrinsic adsorption/reaction rate constant through the following relationship40,42:
Where \({k}_{a,n}\) is the intrinsic adsorption/reaction constant (cm3 mols−1 s−1) and \({\theta }_{n}\) is the concentration of CO* in the case of sites 1 and 2, and the coverage of empty irreversible adsorption sites in the case of site 3 (mol cm−3), \({L}_{{cat}}\) is the length of the catalyst zone (cm) \({S}_{v}\) is the surface area of the catalyst per volume of catalyst (cm2/cm3). This is a slight modification to forms of the equation previously published39, as the MZTRT Symmetric Thin-Zone model does not explicitly include a value for \({L}_{{cat}}\) and so it is lumped into the apparent pseudo-first order adsorption/reaction constant \({k}_{a,n}^{{\prime} }\). For each pathway included in the model, the conversion of oxygen specific to each pathway can be deconvoluted using the following:
The amount of CO2 produced through can be calculated from the conversion of oxygen specific to pathways 1 and 2 by considering the reaction stoichiometry using the following:
From the pathway deconvolution in Fig. 5d–g, we find that pathway 1 is dominant for CO2 production at low-temperatures, whereas at elevated temperatures pathway 2 becomes the dominant pathway. The CO2 yield from each pathway can be easily calculated by summing the deconvoluted CO2 production throughout the TPO experiment (Supplementary Fig. 9). We find that the CO2 yield of pathway 1 stays relatively constant up to a CO adsorption temperature of 200 °C, whereas the CO2 yield of pathway 2 rapidly decreases. Further, when CO is preadsorbed at 350 °C, the amount of CO species related to pathways 1 and 2 becomes approximately equal on the surface.
To identify if any correlation between the two pathways and geometric surface sites exists, we summarised the ratio of the CO2 yield of pathway 1 to pathway 2 calculated from the kinetic model with the quantitative DRIFTS analysis for the population of linear UC and WC CO* sites in Fig. 6. The fraction of pathway 1 from the kinetic model (Fig. 6, black) increases with increasing CO adsorption temperature. From the quantitative deconvolution of the DRIFTS spectra for the population of UC and WC CO* sites (see Supplementary III for details on quantification), the fraction of populated linear CO at UC sites is also increasing with CO adsorption temperature. Deconvolution of the multi-bound CO to WC and UC sites is not possible, but there is a shift to lower frequency of the multi-bound peak maximum with temperature that is consistent with increasing the relative population of UC Pt sites. Most notably, we find a straightforward relationship between the amount of each pathway as calculated from the kinetic model, and the total amount of UC and WC sites calculated using DRIFTS. Due to this direct relationship, we claim that pathway 1 mainly occurs on UC sites, and pathway 2 occurs mainly at WC sites.
Measuring the Intrinsic Kinetics of CO oxidation on UC and WC sites
Along with the reactive site information, the intrinsic surface reaction constants \({k}_{r,1}\) and \({k}_{r,2}\) (related to the reaction of adsorbed oxygen with adsorbed CO for pathways 1 and 2) from the isothermal titration and TPO experiments were calculated and are shown in Fig. 7. As mentioned previously, the reaction over UC sites is ascribed to pathway 1, whereas the reaction over WC sites is ascribed to pathway 2. It can be seen that the rate constant for pathway 1 (\({k}_{r,1}\)) is significantly lower than pathway 2 (\({k}_{r,2}\)) under all conditions probed, with pathway 1 being a slow reaction between adsorbed oxygen and CO and pathway 2 being fast. Interestingly, pathway 1 shows no dependence on temperature or the coverage of CO in both the isothermal O2 titration (Fig. 7a, b) and the TPO (Fig. 7c, d) experiments but is unintuitively a slow reaction. While it is now possible to identify where the reaction is occurring, the intrinsic rate constants alone cannot provide specifics on how the reaction is occurring without further characterisation methods. However, one such rationalisation for this behaviour based on transition state theory would be that the reaction results in a significant loss in entropy in the transition state70. As adsorbed oxygen is considered to be immobile under these conditions, it could be hypothesized that a CO molecule strongly bound to a vertex of a nanoparticle has a large number of degrees of freedom, but during the transition state to make CO2 the species would become immobile due to the strongly bound oxygen, losing a large number of degrees of freedom. However, as CO adsorption on Pt is not well described by DFT71,72, this would be difficult to confirm, so it is important to note that this idea remains conceptual. Experiments using molecular beam scattering14,67 or velocity resolved kinetics73 do not observe this barrierless reaction, but they were performed on Pt single crystals, whereas this work is performed on 2 nm Pt supported nanoparticles, and as such the nanoparticle size effect must also be considered. Other experiments have reported that the barrierless (or near barrierless) oxidation of CO can occur via a Pt(CO3) intermediates74, or through an Eley-Rideal type mechanism15. While we do not find any direct evidence of those pathways, it is also not possible to entirely rule them out. Further, due to the slow nature of the reaction, this pathway would be difficult to isolate as it would certainly be limited by CO desorption under steady-state conditions at any appreciable CO pressure.
We find that pathway 2 shows more classic kinetic behaviour. Under isothermal conditions we find a linear dependence on the coverage of CO* (Fig. 7b) indicating lateral interactions between adsorbed CO* molecules and/or adsorbed O*, which is expected based on previous work35. Under non-isothermal conditions an exponential increase in rate with increasing temperature (Fig. 7d) is observed above 80 °C. It should be noted that as the surface coverage is also changing during the TPO experiment, a classic Arrhenius style analysis to calculate activation energies and pre-exponential factors is non-trivial and will be attempted in future publications. Further, we observed complex kinetic behaviour in pathway 2 below 80 °C (which was not recreated in the isothermal O2 titration experiments) which cannot be described by classical Arrhenius kinetics. It could be hypothesized that some restructuring of the Pt nanoparticles is occurring around 100 °C75, but this will be evaluated in future work combining these methods with techniques such as X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy.
The combination of TAP, kinetic modelling, and DRIFTS measurements provides unparalleled levels of kinetic insight into the dynamic site dependent activity for CO oxidation over 2 nm-sized Pt/SiO2 catalysts. The precisely defined nature of the TAP experiment means that fine kinetic features are resolvable by modelling the exit flux curves using efficient analytical functions. By coupling this insight with DRIFTS measurements, we have been able to identify that site-specific kinetics exists for CO oxidation over 2 nm Pt nanoparticles with the three pathways for the interaction of oxygen with CO* summarised in Fig. 8. We find two pathways for the oxidation of CO* and one pathway for the irreversible adsorption of oxygen (no reaction). Pathway 1 mainly occurs at the UC sites and has slow kinetics, is coverage independent, and is temperature independent. On the contrary, pathway 2 mainly occurs at WC sites with fast kinetics, is highly dependent on the CO* or O* coverage and shows an exponential increase with temperature. These results serve as a significant insight into understanding the kinetics of various reactive sites in heterogeneous catalysis. Typically, it has been widely accepted that increasing the number of UC sites is advantageous for CO conversion22,26. However, even though the reaction at the UC sites is found to be barrierless, it has slow kinetics which may not be optimal for steady-state CO conversion.
The use of probe molecules to titrate catalytically active sites is commonplace in heterogeneous catalysis research22. Using molecules such as CO, H2, or N2O for metal sites, NH3 or pyridine for zeolites, and O2 for oxygen vacancies it becomes possible to count the number of active centres on a catalyst. By performing these experiments in a TAP reactor and coupling them with Multi-Zone TAP Reactor Theory it becomes possible to not only quantify the number of sites, but simultaneously measure their catalytic activity for simple probe reactions (e.g., the oxidation of CO). As the activity for a given probe reaction is directly related to the environment in which that probe molecule is adsorbed, the intrinsic rate constant for the rate of transformation of that species provides a fingerprint of that specific site. Using the kinetic site deconvolution method outlined in this work it then becomes possible to not only count the total number of sites, but to also count the number and distribution of different sites on the catalyst. This allows the structural characterization of catalysts allowing insight regarding size-effects (from a single atom to bulk catalyst) and support-effects, but it also opens up the possibility of rationalising how catalysts dynamically restructure by seeing how the intrinsic rate constants of the probe reactions are modified based on the catalyst state. While this methodology is still in its infancy, we believe that this new approach is general enough to apply to other catalytic systems and can serve as a new toolkit in the characterisation of heterogeneous catalysts.
Methods
Preparation of Pt/SiO2 catalyst
In a typical synthesis of 2 nm-sized Pt nanoparticles,76 100 mg of chloroplatinic acid hydrate (H2PtCl6·xH2O, 99.9%, Sigma–Aldrich), 20 mg of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP, Mw = 40000, Sigma-Aldrich), 2.5 mL of sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 1 N) were dissolved in 10 mL of ethylene glycol (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 50 mL three-neck round-bottom flask. The flask was heated to 80 °C and evacuated for 30 min with vigorous stirring (400 rpm), then heated to 200 °C with a ramp up rate of 10 °C/min. The solution was kept at 200 °C for 2 hr with Ar gas purging. After the reaction, the solution cooled down to RT. The colloidal suspension was diluted to 50 mL of acetone and centrifuged at 6500 rpm (5.45 cm radius, 2574.3 g) for 10 min twice, repeatedly. Then, the as-synthesized Pt nanoparticles were re-dispersed in 40 mL of ethanol. Then, 10 mL of the Pt-dispersed solution was dropped onto the 0.3 g of non-nanoporous (Supplementary Fig. 13) SiO2 powder (pretreated at 700 °C for 1 hr; 10–20 nm, Sigma-Aldrich, Product No. 637238) with vigorous stirring (400 rpm). The suspension was sonicated for 20 min, subsequently evaporating the solvent in a vacuum at 50 °C overnight. The microstructure of the Pt/SiO2 catalyst was investigated via XRD measurement (Supplementary Fig. 1b) and shows diffraction peaks at 39.5 and 46°, corresponding to the (111) and (200) planes of reference Pt (JCPDS #04-0802). For characterisation and TAP experiments, the Pt/SiO2 catalyst was calcined at 500 °C for 1 hr in air condition to remove majority of carbonaceous capping agent with a ramp up rate of 1 °C/min. To prepare the metallic Pt nanoparticles, the Pt/SiO2 catalyst was reduced at 300 °C for 1 hr with a ramp up rate of 1 °C/min under 10% H2 in Ar flow. A SiO2 (blank) sample, was also synthesised using the exact same procedure without the addition of the Pt nanoparticles. We find that no Na contamination can be observed on both the Pt/SiO2 and the SiO2 (blank) samples (Supplementary Fig. 14) using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurement.
Characterisations
The morphology and size distribution of Pt/SiO2 catalyst were investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; ARM 200 F, JEOL) at 200 kV. The catalyst loading was determined using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES; 5110 ICP-OES; Agilent). The catalyst microstructure was measured by X-ray diffractometer (XRD; D2 Phaser, Bruker) with a Cu Kα (1.5406 Å) radiation source (10 mA, 30 kV). The chemical states of catalyst was investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS; Nexsa, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using an Al Kα (hν = 1486.7 eV) X-ray source. All core-level spectrum was calibrated by silicon oxide (Si4+) in Si 2p to 103.5 eV. The XPS sample pretreatments were performed in the DRIFTS reactor and resultant catalyst powder was pressed onto a carbon tape mounted on a Si wafer for each XPS measurement. The N2 adsorption isotherm at 77 K of the SiO2 support was collected by surface characterisation analyser (3Flex, Micromeritics). The steady-state flow catalytic activity was measured in a home-built ambient pressure flow reactor that has been previously described77 with all gas mixtures reported balanced in Ar (See Supplementary IV).
Temporal analysis of products experiments
The TAP technique has been described extensively in the literature40,41,78, but it is summarised here. During the TAP experiment a nanomole pulse of gas ( ~ 1015 molecules, 108 μs pulse width) is sent into a packed bed microreactor that is held at ultra-high vacuum ( < 10−9 torr). During the experiment, the pulsed gas diffuses through the packed bed via Knudsen Diffusion where it can interact with the catalyst surface. Eventually the gas diffuses out the exit of the microreactor and the exit flux of is measured via mass spectrometry. Due to the precisely defined nature of Knudsen Diffusion, the shape (and magnitude) of the exit flux curves provides highly resolved kinetic insight, in particular when coupled with kinetic modelling of the exit flux curves (see section: Modelling of Temporal Analysis of Products Pulse Responses). Further, the small pulse size means that the amount of heat imparted into the system due to the exothermic reaction is negligible.
For the TAP experiments, the Pt/SiO2 catalyst is first calcined at 350 °C by injecting 1000 pulse sets of large O2 pulses (160 μs pulse width) until the CO2 signal (m/z = 44) becomes near-zero to minimise the decomposition of the remaining carbonaceous capping. After injecting a series of O2 pulses at 350 °C, the surface of Pt catalyst was oxidised (Supplementary Fig. 15). So, before all pulse/transient response experiments, the Pt/SiO2 catalyst is reduced at 350 °C by injecting 600 pulse sets of large H2 pulses (160 μs pulse width) to achieve a metallic Pt surface (Supplementary Fig. 15). After the combination of the O2 and the H2 treatments we find that no carbonaceous species can be detected on the Pt catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 16). We utilise a home-built TAP reactor37 where the microreactor contains a layer of commercial sand (29.7 mm; 50–70 mesh SiO2; Sigma-Aldrich) followed by a layer of Pt/SiO2 catalyst (5.4 mg) followed by a final layer of commercial sand (34.4 mm) for a total reactor length of 64.1 mm. The exit flux of CO, O2, Ar, and CO2 is monitored via mass spectrometry. The integrated exit flux of the Ar tracer is used for normalisation of all pulse experiments (see Supplementary V). As the mass spectrometer can only investigate one m/z value per pulse, multiple pulses are used to scan the whole range of m/z values and are combined to one pulse set37. All gas mixtures reported are balanced in Ar. Minimal activity was recorded over the SiO2 (blank) sample (Supplementary Fig. 17) during co-pulsed experiments, with zero activity recorded during a TPO experiment, meaning the catalytic activity recorded during the TPO experiments is solely prescribed to the Pt nanoparticles. The effect of the oxidation of the Pt catalyst during the CO oxidation and TPO experiments below 200 °C can be ruled out in this work (See Supplementary VI).
Diffused reflectance infrared fourier transform spectroscopy experiments
DRIFTS experiments were carried out in a low-temperature reaction chamber (Harrick Scientific) equipped with ZnSe windows, mounted inside the sample compartment of a Bruker Invenio FT-IR spectrometer using a Praying Mantis diffuse reflectance accessory (Harrick Scientific). The catalyst sample was prepared by pressing approximately 2 mg of 2 nm Pt/SiO2 onto a 304 stainless-steel mesh (150 × 150 mesh). The DRIFTS reactor was loaded by placing the catalyst-containing mesh on top of approximately 110 mg of 120 grit SiC, an inert support with high thermal conductivity. There can exist large temperature gradients between the thermocouple contact in a DRIFTS reactor cell and the catalyst surface temperature exposed to the infrared beam79. Therefore, a thermocouple was mounted in physical contact with the bottom of the stainless-steel mesh and the temperature gradient to the catalyst surface at 350 °C was less than 20 °C as calibrated by an optical pyrometer. All DRIFTS experiments used a total volumetric flow rate of 100 sccm. Each absorbance spectrum was obtained by averaging 200 background and sample scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1 using a liquid-nitrogen-cooled HgCdTe (MCT) detector, while the Praying Mantis diffuse reflectance accessory and FT-IR spectrometer was purged with dry N2. The background measurement was acquired after the catalyst sample was annealed at 350 °C for 30 mins in 5% H2 in Ar and cooled to 35 °C in Ar. The sample measurements were acquired after the catalyst sample was annealed at 30 °C/min in Ar to the CO adsorption temperature, the temperature was maintained for 10 mins in 0.1% CO in Ar until saturation was achieved, and the sample was cooled to 35 °C in Ar. A description of the quantitative analysis of the DRIFTS spectra is provided in the Supplementary (see Supplementary III).
Modelling of temporal analysis of products pulse responses
To simulate the TAP exit flux response curves, Multi-Zone TAP Reactor Theory42,43 (MZTRT) was utilised with the catalyst zone being approximated as a Thin Zone39 in the centre of the microreactor between two layers of inert packing. Given the large number of pulses required to saturate/titrate the catalyst surface, the experiments fall well-within the “state defining” regime as required by the MZTRT model. To perform the curve fitting first, the experimentally measured signals were normalised to the inert Ar tracer and corrected using their corresponding calibration factors (see Supplementary V). Then, the curves were further normalised to the amount of reactant gas in the pulsed mixture such that the integrated area under the reactant curve is 0 at 100% conversion and 1 at 0% conversion. Next, the diffusivity of Argon in the packed bed reactor was calculated by fitting a one-zone TAP model to the Ar exit flux curve. As the Knudsen diffusivity is proportional to \(\sqrt{1/M}\) where \(M\) is the molecular weight of the gas, it becomes possible to calculate the diffusivity of the reactant (O2, \(M\) = 32) and product (CO2, \(M\) = 44) gases by scaling the diffusivity relative to the inert gas (Ar, \(M\) = 40). When performing the fitting of the reactant and product curves, the diffusivities of the gases, the reactor length, and the void fraction of the reactor were all fixed, with the only variables being the rate constants for the corresponding model. It is very important to note the regression is performed on each set of exit flux response curves (i.e., exit flux plotted as a function of time) individually. Therefore, the rate constants are calculated separately at each pulse set (and catalyst state) during the experiment. All curve fitting was performed in the MATLAB environment using the lsqcurvefit function, with the 95% confidence intervals for the fitted variables evaluated using the nlparci function. A full description of the MZTRT model used in this work and how the model fitting is performed is available in Supplementary Information I, II, IV, and an example of the MATLAB script used to simulate the TAP experiments is included alongside this paper.
Data availability
The data reported in all figures is available in the Source Data file alongside this manuscript. Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
An example MATLAB script for the modelling of the TAP response curves is also included in the Supplementary Information alongside the data for the 25TPO experiment. The MATLAB script accompanying this paper requires the Curve Fitting Toolbox and the Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox.
References
Mou, T. et al. Bridging the complexity gap in computational heterogeneous catalysis with machine learning. Nat. Catal. 6, 122–136 (2023).
Zhdanov, V. P. Impact of surface science on the understanding of kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Surf. Sci. 500, 966–985 (2002).
Libuda, J. & Freund, H. J. Molecular beam experiments on model catalysts. Surf. Sci. Rep. 57, 157–298 (2005).
Van Spronsen, M. A., Frenken, J. W. M. & Groot, I. M. N. Surface science under reaction conditions: CO oxidation on Pt and Pd model catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 4347–4374 (2017).
Nguyen, L., Tao, F. F., Tang, Y., Dou, J. & Bao, X.-J. Understanding catalyst surfaces during catalysis through near ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 119, 6822–6905 (2019).
Lee, J. D. et al. Dilute alloys based on Au, Ag, or Cu for efficient catalysis: from synthesis to active sites. Chem. Rev. 122, 8758–8808 (2022).
Reece, C. & Madix, R. J. Moving from fundamental knowledge of kinetics and mechanisms on surfaces to prediction of catalyst performance in reactors. ACS Catal. 11, 3048–3066 (2021).
Haruta, M. et al. Low-temperature oxidation of CO over fold supported on TiO2, α-Fe2O3, and Co3O4. J. Catal. 144, 175–192 (1993).
Reske, R., Mistry, H., Behafarid, F., Roldan Cuenya, B. & Strasser, P. Particle size effects in the catalytic electroreduction of CO2 on Cu nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 6978–6986 (2014).
Freund, H.-J., Meijer, G., Scheffler, M., Schlögl, R. & Wolf, M. CO oxidation as a prototypical reaction for heterogeneous processes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 10064–10094 (2011).
Kim, T.-S. et al. Catalytic synergy on PtNi bimetal catalysts driven by interfacial intermediate structures. ACS Catal. 10, 10459–10467 (2020).
Kim, T.-S. et al. Catalytic boosting on AuCu bimetallic nanoparticles by oxygen-induced atomic restructuring. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 331, 122704 (2023).
Maurer, F. et al. Tracking the formation, fate and consequence for catalytic activity of Pt single sites on CeO2. Nat. Catal. 3, 824–833 (2020).
Campbell, C. T., Ertl, G., Kuipers, H. & Segner, J. A molecular beam study of the catalytic oxidation of CO on a Pt(111) surface. J. Chem. Phys. 73, 5862–5873 (1980).
Allian, A. D. et al. Chemisorption of CO and mechanism of CO oxidation on supported platinum nanoclusters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4498–4517 (2011).
Yang, X.-F. et al. Single-atom catalysts: a new frontier in heterogeneous catalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1740–1748 (2013).
Ding, R. et al. Size-dependent shape distributions of platinum nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 4, 3978–3986 (2022).
Vogt, C. et al. Dynamic restructuring of supported metal nanoparticles and its implications for structure insensitive catalysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 7096 (2021).
Chee, S. W., Arce-Ramos, J. M., Li, W., Genest, A. & Mirsaidov, U. Structural changes in noble metal nanoparticles during CO oxidation and their impact on catalyst activity. Nat. Commun. 11, 2133 (2020).
Somorjai, G. A. & Carrazza, J. Structure sensitivity of catalytic reactions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 25, 63–69 (1986).
Beniya, A. et al. CO oxidation activity of non-reducible oxide-supported mass-selected few-atom Pt single-clusters. Nat. Commun. 11, 1888 (2020).
Vogt, C. & Weckhuysen, B. M. The concept of active site in heterogeneous catalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 89–111 (2022).
Wei, J. & Iglesia, E. Mechanism and site requirements for activation and chemical conversion of methane on supported Pt clusters and turnover rate comparisons among noble metals. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 4094–4103 (2004).
Ramallo-López, J. M. et al. Complementary methods for cluster size distribution measurements: supported platinum nanoclusters in methane reforming catalysts. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 228, 299–307 (2005).
Kale, M. J. & Christopher, P. Utilizing quantitative in situ FTIR spectroscopy to identify well-coordinated Pt atoms as the active site for CO oxidation on Al2O3-supported Pt catalysts. ACS Catal. 6, 5599–5609 (2016).
Neumann, S. et al. Insights into the reaction mechanism and particle size effects of CO oxidation over supported Pt nanoparticle catalysts. J. Catal. 377, 662–672 (2019).
Darshini, S. P. In situ and Operando Tools and Methods for Characterization of Heterogeneous Catalysts. (University of Kansas, 2019).
Yablonsky, G. S. Decoding complexity of chemical reactions. Theor. Found. Chem. Eng. 48, 608–613 (2014).
Reece, C., Redekop, E. A., Karakalos, S., Friend, C. M. & Madix, R. J. Crossing the great divide between single-crystal reactivity and actual catalyst selectivity with pressure transients. Nat. Catal. 1, 852–859 (2018).
Karatok, M., Madix, R. J., Van Der Hoeven, J. E. S., Aizenberg, J. & Reece, C. Quantifying oxygen induced surface enrichment of a dilute PdAu alloy catalyst. Catal. Sci. Technol. 11, 7530–7534 (2021).
Widmann, D. & Behm, R. J. Activation of molecular oxygen and the nature of the active oxygen species for CO oxidation on oxide supported Au catalysts. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 740–749 (2014).
Shekhtman, S. O., Yablonsky, G. S., Gleaves, J. T. & Fushimi, R. R. Thin-zone TAP reactor as a basis of ‘state-by-state transient screening’. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 5493–5500 (2004).
Shekhtman, S. O., Goguet, A., Burch, R., Hardacre, C. & Maguire, N. CO multipulse TAP studies of 2% Pt/CeO2 catalyst: Influence of catalyst pretreatment and temperature on the number of active sites observed. J. Catal. 253, 303–311 (2008).
Ding, K. et al. Identification of active sites in CO oxidation and water-gas shift over supported Pt catalysts. Science 350, 189–192 (2015).
Bourane, A. & Bianchi, D. Oxidation of CO on a Pt/Al2O3 catalyst: from the surface elementary steps to lighting-off tests: II. kinetic study of the oxidation of adsorbed CO species using mass spectroscopy. J. Catal. 209, 114–125 (2002).
Engel, T. & Ertl, G. Elementary steps in the catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide on platinum metals. in Advances in Catalysis 28 1–78 (Elsevier, 1979).
Brandão, L., High, E. A., Kim, T.-S. & Reece, C. Simplifying the Temporal Analysis of Products reactor. Chem. Eng. J. 478, 147489 (2023).
Shekhtman, S. O., Maguire, N., Goguet, A., Burch, R. & Hardacre, C. Three primary kinetic characteristics observed in a pulse-response TAP experiment. Catal. Today 121, 255–260 (2007).
Shekhtman, S. O., Yablonsky, G. S., Chen, S. & Gleaves, J. T. Thin-zone TAP-reactor - theory and application. Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, 4371–4378 (1999).
Gleaves, J. T., Yablonskii, G. S., Phanawadee, P. & Schuurman, Y. TAP-2: An interrogative kinetics approach. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 160, 55–88 (1997).
Fushimi, R. Temporal analysis of product (TAP). in Springer Handbook of Advanced Catalyst Characterization 899–934 (Springer, 2023).
Constales, D., Yablonsky, G. S., Marin, G. B. & Gleaves, J. T. Multi-zone TAP-reactors theory and application: I. The global transfer matrix equation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 56, 133–149 (2001).
Constales, D., Yablonsky, G. S., Marin, G. B. & Gleaves, J. T. Multi-zone TAP-reactors theory and application. III Multi-response theory and criteria of instantaneousness. Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 3725–3736 (2004).
Hammer, B., Nielsen, O. H. & Nørskov, J. K. Structure sensitivity in adsorption: CO interaction with stepped and reconstructed Pt surfaces. Catal. Lett. 46, 31–35 (1997).
Meunier, F. C., Elgayyar, T., Dembélé, K. & Kaper, H. Stability of Pt-adsorbed CO on catalysts for room temperature-oxidation of CO. Catalysts 12, 532 (2022).
Lundwall, M. J., McClure, S. M. & Goodman, D. W. Probing terrace and step sites on Pt nanoparticles using CO and ethylene. J. Phys. Chem. C. 114, 7904–7912 (2010).
Hayden, B. E. & Bradshaw, A. M. The adsorption of CO on Pt(111) studied by infrared reflection-absorption spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 125, 787–802 (1983).
Carrasco, E. et al. Infrared spectra of high coverage CO adsorption structures on Pt(111). Surf. Sci. 604, 1320–1325 (2010).
Hopster, H. & Ibach, H. Adsorption of CO on Pt(111) and Pt 6(111) × (111) studied by high resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy and thermal desorption spectroscopy. Surf. Sci. 77, 109–117 (1978).
McClellan, M. R., Gland, J. L. & McFeeley, F. R. Carbon monoxide adsorption on the kinked Pt(321) surface. Surf. Sci. 112, 63–77 (1981).
Yoshinobu, J., Tsukahara, N., Yasui, F., Mukai, K. & Yamashita, Y. Lateral displacement by transient mobility in chemisorption of CO on Pt(997). Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 248301 (2003).
Luo, J. S., Tobin, R. G., Lambert, D. K., Fisher, G. B. & DiMaggio, C. L. CO adsorption site occupation on Pt(335): a quantitative investigation using TPD and EELS. Surf. Sci. 274, 53–62 (1992).
Hayden, B. E., Kretzschmar, K., Bradshaw, A. M. & Greenler, R. G. An infrared study of the adsorption of CO on a stepped platinum surface. Surf. Sci. 149, 394–406 (1985).
Banholzer, W. F. & Masel, R. I. A reflection-absorption infrared study of carbon monoxide and nitric oxide adsorption on platinum(100). Surf. Sci. 137, 339–360 (1984).
Fanson, P. T., Delgass, W. N. & Lauterbach, J. Island formation during kinetic rate oscillations in the oxidation of CO over Pt/SiO2: a transient Fourier transform infrared spectrometry study. J. Catal. 204, 35–52 (2001).
Brandt, K. & Hughes, M. R. The interpretation of CO adsorbed on Pt/SiO2 of two different particle-size distributions. Surf. Sci. 286, 15–25 (1993).
Avanesian, T. et al. Quantitative and atomic-scale view of CO-induced Pt nanoparticle surface reconstruction at saturation coverage via DFT calculations coupled with in situ TEM and IR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4551–4558 (2017).
Kappers, M. J. & Van Der Maas, J. H. Correlation between CO frequency and Pt coordination number. A DRIFT study on supported Pt catalysts. Catal. Lett. 10, 365–373 (1991).
Hossain, M. J. & Rahman, M. M. & Jafar Sharif, Md. Preference for low-coordination sites by adsorbed CO on small platinum nanoparticles. Nanoscale Adv. 2, 1245–1252 (2020).
Liu, A. et al. Getting insights into the temperature-specific active sites on platinum nanoparticles for CO oxidation: A combined in situ spectroscopic and ab Initio density functional theory study. ACS Catal. 9, 7759–7768 (2019).
Kustov, L. M., Ostgard, D. & Sachtler, W. M. H. IR spectroscopic study of Pt/Kl zeolites using adsorption of CO as a molecular probe. Catal. Lett. 9, 121–126 (1991).
Di, M. et al. Chasing PtOx species in ceria supported platinum during CO oxidation extinction with correlative operando spectroscopic techniques. J. Catal. 409, 1–11 (2022).
Klimavicius, V., Neumann, S., Kunz, S., Gutmann, T. & Buntkowsky, G. Room temperature CO oxidation catalysed by supported Pt nanoparticles revealed by solid-state NMR and DNP spectroscopy. Catal. Sci. Technol. 9, 3743–3752 (2019).
Persson, B. N. J., Tüshaus, M. & Bradshaw, A. M. On the nature of dense CO adlayers. J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5034–5046 (1990).
Baró, A. M. & Ibach, H. New study of CO adsorption at low temperature (90 K) on Pt (111) by EELS. J. Chem. Phys. 71, 4812 (1979).
Sangnier, A. et al. Thermokinetic and spectroscopic mapping of carbon monoxide adsorption on highly dispersed Pt/γ-Al 2 O 3. ACS Catal. 11, 13280–13293 (2021).
Zaera, F., Liu, J. & Xu, M. Isothermal study of the kinetics of carbon monoxide oxidation on Pt(111): Rate dependence on surface coverages. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 4204–4215 (1997).
Mhadeshwar, A. B. & Vlachos, D. G. A thermodynamically consistent surface reaction mechanism for CO oxidation on Pt. Combust. Flame 142, 289–298 (2005).
Shekhtman, S. O. & Yablonsky, G. S. Thin-zone TAP reactor versus differential PFR: analysis of concentration nonuniformity for gas−solid systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 6518–6522 (2005).
Dumesic, J. A., Rudd, D. F., Aparicio, L. M., Rekoske, J. E. & Treviño, A. A. The Microkinetics of Heterogeneous Catalysis. (American Chemical Society, 1993).
Janthon, P., Viñes, F., Sirijaraensre, J., Limtrakul, J. & Illas, F. Adding pieces to the CO/Pt(111) puzzle: the role of dispersion. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 3970–3977 (2017).
Feibelman, P. J. et al. The CO/Pt(111) puzzle. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 4018–4025 (2001).
Neugebohren, J. et al. Velocity-resolved kinetics of site-specific carbon monoxide oxidation on platinum surfaces. Nature 558, 280–283 (2018).
Newton, M. A., Ferri, D., Smolentsev, G., Marchionni, V. & Nachtegaal, M. Room-temperature carbon monoxide oxidation by oxygen over Pt/Al2O3 mediated by reactive platinum carbonates. Nat. Commun. 6, 8675 (2015).
Meunier, F. C. et al. Synergy between metallic and oxidized Pt sites unravelled during room temperature CO oxidation on Pt/Ceria. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 3799–3805 (2021).
Song, H. C. et al. The effect of the oxidation states of supported oxides on catalytic activity: CO oxidation studies on Pt/cobalt oxide. Chem. Commun. 55, 9503–9506 (2019).
High, E. A., Lee, E. & Reece, C. A transient flow reactor for rapid gas switching at atmospheric pressure. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 94, 054101 (2023).
Morgan, K. et al. Forty years of Temporal Analysis of Products. Catal. Sci. Technol. 7, 2416–2439 (2017).
Meunier, F. C. Pitfalls and benefits of in situ and operando diffuse reflectance FT-IR spectroscopy (DRIFTS) applied to catalytic reactions. React. Chem. Eng. 1, 134–141 (2016).
Geissler, P. L. Temperature dependence of inhomogeneous broadening: on the meaning of isosbestic points. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14930–14935 (2005).
Acknowledgements
C.R. gratefully acknowledges the Rowland Fellowship through the Rowland Institute at Harvard. The authors would like to acknowledge Samantha Le for their assistance generating replicate data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Taek-Seung Kim: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft Christopher R. O’Connor: Investigation, Writing – original draft Christian Reece: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing T.S.K. performed the synthesis, characterisation and TAP experiments. C.R.O. performed the DRIFTS experiments. C.R. performed the TAP modelling and supervised the project. All authors in frequent discussions and contributed significantly to writing the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Frédéric Meunier and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, TS., O’Connor, C.R. & Reece, C. Interrogating site dependent kinetics over SiO2-supported Pt nanoparticles. Nat Commun 15, 2074 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46496-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46496-1
- Springer Nature Limited