Abstract
The demand for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines is increasing to address the lithium supply shortage. Nanofiltration separation technology with high Mg2+/Li+ separation efficiency has shown great potential for lithium extraction. However, it usually requires diluting the brine with a large quantity of freshwater and only yields Li+-enriched solution. Inspired by the process of selective ion uptake and salt secretion in mangroves, we report here the direct extraction of lithium from salt-lake brines by utilizing the synergistic effect of ion separation membrane and solar-driven evaporator. The ion separation membrane-based solar evaporator is a multilayer structure consisting of an upper photothermal layer to evaporate water, a hydrophilic porous membrane in the middle to generate capillary pressure as the driving force for water transport, and an ultrathin ion separation membrane at the bottom to allow Li+ to pass through and block other multivalent ions. This process exhibits excellent lithium extraction capability. When treating artificial salt-lake brine with salt concentration as high as 348.4 g L−1, the Mg2+/Li+ ratio is reduced by 66 times (from 19.8 to 0.3). This research combines ion separation with solar-driven evaporation to directly obtain LiCl powder, providing an efficient and sustainable approach for lithium extraction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Lithium, one of the most valuable resources, has found its way into various industries, ranging from ceramics, glass, pharmaceuticals, and nuclear to the booming lithium battery technology1,2,3,4. The rapid growth in lithium consumption, spurred by the expansion of the lithium battery market in recent years, has made it crucial to source lithium from various channels5,6,7,8,9,10. Lithium sourcing from salt-lake brines accounts for ≈70% of recoverable lithium on land11. It has become a vital supply route to ensure the healthy development of the lithium battery market. However, lithium extraction from salt-lake brines is challenging because of the high concentration of competing ions, like Mg2+. Compared to conventional ion separation technologies such as ion exchange12, electrodialysis13, and solvent extraction14, nanofiltration (NF) membrane separation15,16,17 is considered one of the most efficient methods for extracting lithium from brine. The combination of size sieving and Donnan exclusion in NF membranes offers an ideal option for achieving effective monovalent/divalent ion separation, particularly for Li+/Mg2+ separation18,19,20,21,22. To enhance the performance of Li+ separation, various investigations have been carried out, including developing innovative NF membrane materials and optimizing the membrane structure and surface properties23,24,25,26. Despite significant advancements in the separation of Mg2+ and Li+ using NF membrane processes, highly concentrated brines generate a high osmotic pressure difference across the NF membrane, requiring high applied pressure that may exceed the mechanical strength of the membrane module. Therefore, the conventional NF process typically involves the 10–20 times dilution of high-concentration brine with a large quantity of freshwater in the pre-treatment stage14,27,28. Moreover, NF membrane separation processes solely yield Li+-enriched solutions, necessitating further concentration to obtain solid lithium products, which requires energy-intensive processes like thermal distillation or high-pressure reverse osmosis to obtain the Li+-enriched solution with the required concentration. Hence, innovative material and separation process design is required to achieve more efficient and cost-effective Mg/Li separation.
Interfacial solar evaporation, a sustainable and cost-effective technology for clean water production, harnesses solar energy and concentrates generated heat to facilitate water evaporation29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. Additionally, this approach offers a promising avenue for salt resource recovery from seawater and brines37,38,39,40. During evaporation, salt ions become concentrated and eventually precipitate out. Selective ion uptake and transport driven by interfacial solar evaporation are common processes in plants. For instance, mangrove is a type of salt-tolerant tree that thrives in tropical and subtropical coastal regions (Fig. 1a)41,42. Mangroves can regulate the uptake and release of ions to adapt to the saline or brackish environment43. When provided with optimal sunlight and temperature, the stomata in leaves open, causing water molecules to be released into the atmosphere as vapor. This process is followed by water flow towards the stomata, effectively replacing the evaporated water molecules while ensuring the continuous upward flow of water and ions toward the leaves44,45. To survive in seawater, ion pumps and channels in cell membranes selectively transport ions through mangrove roots (Fig. 1b)46,47. Additionally, salt glands located in leaves enable mangroves to directly secrete salt out of their systems (inset in Fig. 1a), further aiding their ability to survive in saline environments48,49.
Inspired by the process of selective ion uptake and salt secretion in mangroves, we utilize the synergistic effect of ion separation membrane and solar-driven evaporator to direct extraction of lithium chloride (LiCl) powder from salt-lake brines. Figure 1c illustrates the structure of the membrane-based solar-driven evaporator, composed of three functional layers. To realize a high photothermal conversion efficiency, vertically aligned polyaniline (PANI) nanofiber array was selected as the upper photothermal layer owing to its sunlight absorption capacity. In the middle, a hydrophilic poly(ether sulfone) (PES) macroporous membrane with interconnected water-conducting channels generates capillary pressures serving as the driving force for water transport. At the bottom is an ultrathin polyamide (PA) ion separation membrane allowing Li+ to pass through and block other multivalent ions, like Ca2+ and Mg2+. When treating a LiCl/MgCl2 mixed solution, water and Li+ ions trans through the PA membrane to reach the photothermal layer under capillary pressure. As water continually evaporates, solid LiCl powders can be collected directly on the surface of the evaporator. This ion separation membrane-based solar evaporator maintains a stable lithium enrichment even when processing high-concentration salt solutions. This study demonstrates the amazing capability of lithium enrichment. It provides an effective way to directly obtain high-purity lithium from salt-lake brines only using sustainable energy.
Results and discussion
Fabrication and characterization of PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator
Figure 2a demonstrates the schematic illustration of the PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator. The PANI nanoarrays were grown in situ on a PES macroporous membrane with a sponge-like pore structure (Supplementary Fig. 1) that serves as a substrate. Nanofibers were formed through a polymerization process of aniline monomers using ammonium persulfate50,51. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images in Fig. 2b–d shows that the surface and internal channels of the PES substrate were coated by vertically aligned PANI nanofibers with 30–50 nm in diameter and 50–250 nm in length. The resulting PANI nanoarrays-coated PES membrane was hydrophilic, with an instantaneous water contact angle (CA) of 11° (inset in Fig. 2b). The pore size distribution of the PES substrate before and after the growth of PANI nanoarrays was measured using the bubble pressure method. As demonstrated in Fig. 2e, the average pore diameter of the PES substrate reduced from 345 nm to 225 nm due to the growth of PANI nanoarrays on its inner surface.
A stable and efficient water supply is a crucial component of the solar evaporator. During the steady interface evaporation process, water molecules removed by evaporation are replaced by water flow toward the air-water interface. The cohesive force between water molecules is crucial in maintaining a continuous water supply, generating tension between the molecules44,45. The water surface tension that forms in micrometer-sized pores or channels can generate a capillary pressure that is the primary driving force for water transport in a solar evaporator. The capillary pressure (Pc) can be estimated using the Young-Laplace equation, Pc = 4γcosθ/d, where γ is the surface tension of water, θ is the water CA on the pore surface, and d is the pore diameter. For the above equation, γ is 0.071 N m−1 at 30 °C, assuming θ is the water CA on the membrane surface. The pores or channels in PES substrate and PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator can produce capillary pressures of 7.6 and 12.3 bar in the liquid phase, respectively (Fig. 2f). This result proves that smaller pore size and a hydrophilic surface can increase capillary pressure.
Efficiently absorbing broad-spectrum sunlight and converting it into heat are important steps in solar-driven evaporation. The PANI evaporator presented a dark surface resulting from its exceptional light absorption capacity, particularly in the visible range, reaching as high as 96% (Fig. 2g). The PANI nanoarrays efficiently trap incident light and promote its multiple reflectance until absorption, contributing to the high absorption capacity52. To evaluate the light-to-heat conversion performance, the surface temperature of the PANI nanoarrays evaporator was monitored under 3 sun illumination using an infrared thermal imager (Fig. 2h). Within 2 min of illumination, the surface temperature of the wet PANI nanoarrays evaporator increased rapidly from 22.0 to 49.2 °C. After 5 min, the surface temperature reached a maximum of 54.0 °C and remained stable. The light-to-heat conversion performance can be attributed to the superior light-harvesting efficiency of PANI nanofiber arrays. Water evaporation rates were measured at 3.13 kg m−2 h−1 under 3 sun illumination by recording the weight loss (Fig. 2i). This remarkable performance can be attributed to the high photothermal conversion efficiency and efficient water supply of the PANI nanoarrays evaporator.
Li+/Mg2+ separation performance of PA membrane
A membrane with high mono-/di-valent ion separation performance is highly required to extract lithium from brine effectively. State-of-the-art mono-/di-valent ion separation membranes are based on a thin film composite design, which deposits a PA selective layer, formed by interfacial polymerization between piperazine (PIP) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC), on the top of porous substrate. We have previously reported that deposition of a thin layer of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) film on macroporous PES membrane greatly improves the quality of the obtained PA layer thanks to the high porosity, smoothness, and narrowly distributed pores of the SWCNT film53. Following previous studies24,53, PA membranes were fabricated on the surface of SWCNTs film via interfacial polymerization (Fig. 3a). Firstly, a thin SWCNT film was prepared through vacuum-filtrating a certain amount of SWCNTs dispersion onto a PES membrane with pore size of ~0.2 μm. The surface SEM image of SWCNTs film shows that a network porous structure was formed from interconnected carbon nanotubes with a high porosity (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Then a typical interfacial polymerization process was conducted on the surface of SWCNT film, in which PIP and TMC reacted at water-hexane interface to form the PA layer. A smooth PA layer was formed after the interfacial polymerization process using 2 mg mL−1 TMC and 10 mg mL−1 PIP solutions (Supplementary Fig. 2b). The cross-sectional SEM image shows a bilayer structure with a thickness of 125 ± 5 nm (Fig. 3b).
The crosslinking degree of the resultant PA membrane reflects the efficiency of the interfacial reaction and determines the effective pore size. To study the effect of pore size on Li+/Mg2+ separation, the crosslinking degree of the PA layer was tuned by changing the TMC concentrations of 1, 2, to 4 mg mL−1 during the interfacial polymerization process. The obtained membrane was denoted as PA-X, X representing the TMC concentration used in the interfacial polymerization process. The chemical composition of obtained PA layers was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Supplementary Fig. 3). In the C1s XPS spectra, four peaks were detected, which were ascribed to O = C–O (centered at 288.5 eV), O = C–N (centered at 287.7 eV), C–N (centered at 286.0 eV), and C–C (centered at 284.8 eV) in the PA layer, further confirming the formation of the polyamide structure24. The O = C–N group was derived from the reaction between the acyl chloride in TMC monomers and secondary amine in PIP monomers. The O = C–O group can be attributed to the carboxyl acid group formed by the hydrolysis of the unreacted acylchloride group. With the TMC concentration increasing from 1 to 2 and 4 mg mL−1, the O = C–N content gradually increased from 6.35% to 6.48%, and 7.26%. The O = C–O content decreased from 2.85% to 2.45% and 1.95% (Supplementary Table 1). The crosslinking degrees of PA layers were calculated based on the O/N elemental ratio from the XPS spectra. As shown in Fig. 3c, the crosslinking degrees of PA-1, PA-2, and PA-4 were 70.6%, 74.1%, and 78.3%, respectively. These results indicate that the increase in the TMC concentration could improve the crosslinking degree of the PA layer during the PIP-TMC interfacial polymerization process.
The molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) and pore size distribution of the PA membranes were calculated using neutral organic molecules as probes (detailed information see Supplementary Methods). As shown in Fig. 3d, the MWCO of the PA membrane decreased from 422 Da to 309 Da by increasing the TMC concentration from 1 to 4 mg mL−1. According to the function fitting of the corresponding pore model, the mean pore size was 0.63, 0.61, and 0.57 nm for PA-1, PA-2, and PA-4, respectively (Fig. 3e). This result indicates that the effective pore size of the PA layer decreased with the increase of the crosslinking degree. The performance of the PA membrane was evaluated by experimenting with a cross-flow filtration with transmembrane pressure of 4.0 bar. The rejections to MgCl2 (1.0 g L−1) were 95.1%, 96.1%, and 96.9% for PA-1, PA-2, and PA-4, respectively. The rejection of LiCl (1.0 g L−1) slightly increased from 59.1% to 61.3% with the increase of crosslinking degree. These results are reasonable when compared to the hydrated ion diameter and hydration energy of Li+ and Mg2+. The hydrated Mg2+ diameter was 0.86 nm, larger than most of pores in the PA membrane. As Mg2+ enters PA membrane, the energy required to strip water from the hydration shell of Mg2+ is 437.4 kcal mol−154. In contrast, the hydrated Li+ diameter is 0.76 nm, whereas the energy required to strip water from the hydration shell of Li+ is 113.5 kcal mol−1. Therefore, the PA membrane demonstrated a higher rejection rate to Mg2+ than Li+.
Solar-driven lithium extraction
After evaluating the basic properties of PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator and PA membrane, we proceeded the investigation of the separation performance of solar-driven Li+/Mg2+ separation. A solar-driven Li+/Mg2+ separation device was designed and constructed, which incorporated a PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator as the top photothermal layer and a PA-4 membrane as the selective barrier for Li+/Mg2+ separation (Fig. 4a). To evaluate Li+/Mg2+ separation performance during interfacial evaporation, we employed a mixed solution containing 0.45 g L−1 of LiCl and 0.90 g L−1 of MgCl2 (Li+ and Mg2+ had similar molality of ~100 mM). When the PA membrane was introduced beneath the PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator, the water evaporation rate slightly decreased to 2.95 kg m−2 h−1 under 3 sun irradiation. (Supplementary Fig. 4). After observing 120 min of stable evaporation, white salt powders accumulated on the surface of the PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator (Fig. 4b), indicating that capillary pressure enables water and ions permeation through the PA membrane. The transmembrane rate of Li+ was found to be 0.91 mol m−2 h−1, which was 13 times faster than that of Mg2+ in the ion separation membrane-based solar evaporator (Fig. 4c), indicating that the ultrathin PA membrane maintains its monovalent/divalent ion selectivity, even under capillary pressure-driven separation process.
To investigate the effect of the Mg2+/Li+ ratio on solar-driven lithium extraction, the LiCl concentration was kept constant at 0.45 g L−1 and the MgCl2 concentration gradually increased from 0.45 to 4.50 g L−1. Under 3 sun irradiation, the water evaporation rate remained around 2.9–3.0 kg m−2 h−1. However, it is observed that the LiCl crystallization rate increased from 37.3 to 61.8 g m−2 h−1 with the increase of Mg2+/Li+ ratio (Fig. 5a). This phenomenon can be explained by the Donnan equilibrium55,56, where the increase in the Mg2+/Li+ ratio causes a proportional rise in Cl− concentration. With a higher amount of Cl− in the solution, more Cl− can permeate through the PA membrane. To maintain equilibrium on both sides of the membrane, Li+ with a smaller hydrated ion diameter and lower hydration energy also trans through the PA membrane, increasing the LiCl crystallization rate. Figure 5b demonstrates the proportion of LiCl in solution and in salt powder collected on the PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator. During the evaporation process of MgCl2/LiCl mixed solution with mass ratio of 1:1, the proportion of LiCl increased from 50.0% in the feed solution to 94.2% in the salt powder collected on the PANI evaporator surface. In the case of an MgCl2/LiCl mixed solution with a mass ratio of 10:1, the proportion of LiCl was enriched from 9.1% in the feed solution to 52.4% in the salt powder, indicating a high lithium enrichment efficiency.
To further examine the effect of salt concentrations on solar-driven lithium extraction, the total concentration of MgCl2 and LiCl was increased from 10 to 80 g L−1 while maintaining a MgCl2/LiCl mass ratio of 1:1. Under 3 sun irradiation, the water evaporation rate remained around 3.0 kg m−2 h−1, while the LiCl crystallization rate increased from 41.2 to 186.2 g m−2 h−1 (Fig. 5c). Notably, the PA membrane kept a stable Mg2+/Li+ separation performance, with the LiCl/MgCl2 separation factor remaining above 16.2 (Fig. 5d). The proportion of LiCl in the salt powder collected from the surface of PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator was in the range of 94.2 to 95.1%, indicating that the device can effectively extract lithium ions from Mg2+/Li+ mixtures even in high concentration and high Mg2+/Li+ ratio.
The device was further exploited to process a simulated salt-lake brine containing 268.0 g L−1 NaCl, 5.1 g L−1 LiCl, 66.1 g L−1 MgCl2, and 9.2 g L−1 CaCl2 (referring to the compositions of the Uyuni salar brine57,58). In the simulated salt-lake brine, total salt concentration was as high as 348.4 g L−1 and Mg2+/Li+ mass ratio was up to 19.8. Under 3 sun irradiation, the water evaporation rate was around 2.2 kg m−2 h−1, and salt crystallization rate was 480 g m−2 h−1. The salt powder can be directly collected from the surface of the PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator. The composition was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. Compared with the composition of simulated salt-lake brine, NaCl proportion in the solid salt powder increased from 76.9% to 96.3%, LiCl proportion increased from 1.5% to 2.3% (Supplementary Fig. 5). Correspondingly, MgCl2 proportion decreased from 19% to 0.5% and CaCl2 proportion decreased from 2.7% to 0.9%. These results indicate that monovalent salts can be enriched by the synergistic effect of membrane-based ion separation and solar-driven evaporation. To determine the salt rejection, we assume that the salt powder was dissolved in the evaporated water. The rejection to MgCl2 was as high as 98.3%, and the rejection to CaCl2 was 78.5% (Fig. 5e and Supplementary Table 2). The slightly lower rejection to CaCl2 than that of MgCl2 is ascribed to the smaller hydrated diameter of Ca2+ than Mg2+. In contrast, the rejection to NaCl and LiCl was 21.7% and 2.0%, respectively, indicating that monovalent salt ions, like Na+ and K+, can pass through the PA membrane, while most of the Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions were rejected.
The ratio of magnesium and lithium in brines is a key factor in determining the process of lithium extraction. When the Mg2+/Li+ mass ratio is lower, it becomes easier to extract lithium from salt-lake brines. The mass ratio of Mg2+/Li+ in the salt powders collected on the surface of the PANI nanoarrays solar evaporator was 0.3. This is a significant decrease compared to the simulated salt-lake brine, with a reduction of 66 times (Fig. 5f). At a low Mg2+/Li+ ratio, after adding NaOH and sodium oxalate to remove residual small amounts of Mg2+ and Ca2+, lithium can be readily precipitated out in the form of Li2CO3 by adding Na2CO3. The sediment was separated by centrifugation, washed using deionized water, and then dried in a vacuum oven. The collected white powder (Fig. 5g inset) was characterized by powder X-ray diffraction spectroscopy (XRD), whereby the pattern fitted well with the standard pattern of Li2CO3 (PDF#22-1141) without any impurity signals being detected. Further quantitative elemental analysis shows that the purity of Li2CO3 was around 99% which meets the requirements of battery-grade Li2CO3 purity.
To evaluate the potential for application, we carried out an outdoor experiment which carried out from 9:00 to 16:00 under natural sunlight with an average solar heat flux of ~0.7 kw m−2. The membrane-based solar evaporator was employed to treat the simulated salt-lake brine. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 6a, the rate of water evaporation was influenced by the intensity of solar irradiation. The maximum water evaporation rate of 0.95 L m−2 h−1 was observed at noon, which was consistent with the result obtained in the laboratory under 1 sun irradiation. At 16:00, the salt crystals were collected, and the PANI was regenerated for tomorrow’s experiment. During the following 5-day test (Supplementary Fig. 6b), the amount of evaporated water and collected salt crystals were maintained stable, showing its great potential for practical lithium extraction. In addition, the scalability of the membrane-based solar evaporator is also a critically important consideration. The system can be scaled up easily by increasing its size and multiplying the brine treatment capacity using an array of solar evaporators.
In summary, drawing inspiration from the selective water/ion uptake and salt secretion processes in mangroves, we reported the synergistic design of ion separation membrane and solar-driven interfacial evaporator, which effectively extracts solid LiCl from a mixed salt solution, achieving a purity level of up to 94%. Notably, our ion separation membrane-based solar evaporator demonstrates the ability to directly treat simulated salt-lake brine, even at concentrations as high as 348.4 g L−1, resulting in a remarkable 66-fold reduction in the Mg2+/Li+ ratio (from 19.8 to 0.3). At a low Mg2+/Li+ ratio, battery-grade Li2CO3 powder can be precipitated out through a simple precipitation process. By combining ion separation with solar-driven interfacial evaporation, our research introduces a new and promising approach for lithium extraction utilizing renewable energy sources. Hence, it is expected that this approach will lead to the development of a promising process to secure the lithium supply for future energy uses.
Methods
Fabrication of PANI nanoarrays evaporator
Initially, 93 mg aniline and 114 mg ammonium persulfate were dissolved separately in 50 mL of 1.0 mol L−1 perchloric acid solution under magnetic stirring. These were then cooled in an ice-water bath for 30 min, resulting in a 0.02 mol L−1 aniline solution and a 0.01 mol L−1 ammonium persulfate solution. Subsequently, the ammonium persulfate solution was rapidly poured into the aniline solution, and a PES membrane was submerged in the mixture. The reaction proceeded with magnetic stirring in an ice-water bath for 12 h. Upon completion of the reaction, the membrane was rinsed with deionized water and soaked in a 0.1 mol L−1 ammonium hydroxide solution for 2 h. Afterward, the membrane was thoroughly rinsed with deionized water and dried in a forced-air oven at 60 °C.
Fabrication of PA membrane
The polyamide membrane was prepared at 25.0 ± 0.5 °C and 60 ± 5% relative humidity. 1.0 g PIP and 0.24 g sodium dodecyl sulfate were dissolved in 100 mL water to produce PIP aqueous solution. The SWCNTs film was first placed on a glass plate and then impregnated with PIP solution for 30 s. The glass plate was drained vertically, and excess PIP solution was removed from the SWCNTs film surface. Then TMC n-hexane solution (1, 2, and 4 mg mL−1) was poured onto the surface of SWCNTs film for 30 s which resulted in the formation of a polyamide active layer. The resulting SWCNTs film supported PA membrane was immersed in n-hexane for 30 s to remove unreacted TMC, then heated in an oven at 90 °C for 30 min to increase the crosslinking degree of polyamide network. The membrane after heating was placed in deionized water and stored in a refrigerator at 4 °C.
Material characterizations
The morphology of the PANI nanoarrays evaporator and PA membranes were captured by a field emission SEM (Hitachi S8230). The light absorption property of PANI-m was analyzed by ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometry (UV2600, Shimadzu). The infrared images and surface temperatures were captured by an ICI 8320 infrared camera (ICI, USA). The water CAs were measured on an OCA20 machine (Data-physics, Germany). The average pore size of PES substrate and PANI nanoarrays evaporator were measured by a bubble-pressure method membrane pore size analyzer (Beishide, 3H-2000PB). The surface elements of the polyamide membranes were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific EXCALAB 250).
Evaluation of Li+/Mg2+ separation of PA membrane
The separation performance of PA membrane was evaluated by using a cross-flow filtration apparatus at room temperature. The effective area of PA membrane was 7.1 cm2. Either 1.0 g L−1 LiCl solution or 1.0 g L−1 MgCl2 solution was used as feed solution. Rejection was calculated based on the Eq. (1). The concentration of each solution was obtained by conductivity.
Where \({{{\mbox{c}}}}_{{{\mbox{f}}}}\) and \({{{\mbox{c}}}}_{{{\mbox{p}}}}\) represent the concentration of feed and filtrate solutions, respectively.
Evaluation of solar-driven lithium extraction
The solar-driven lithium extraction was conducted at a temperature of 25.0 ± 0.5 °C and relative humidity of 40 ± 5%. A solar simulator (Xe lamp, PL-X300, Beijing Precise Technology Co., Ltd.) was used for the indoor tests. The test device for solar-driven lithium extraction is shown in Fig. 4a. A LiCl and MgCl2 mixed solution was added in a container. When evaluating the effect of the Mg2+/Li+ ratio on solar-driven lithium extraction, the LiCl concentration was kept constant at 0.45 g L−1 in the mixed salt solution while the MgCl2 concentration was gradually increased from 0.45 to 4.50 g L−1. When investigating the impact of salt concentrations, the overall salt concentration was increased from 10 to 80 g/L while keeping a MgCl2/LiCl mass ratio of 1.0. The solution was conducted through a hydrophilic filter paper to the PA membrane. To ensure that the ions pass through the PA membrane for selective separation and then reach the PANI nanoarrays evaporator, the diameter of the PA membrane is larger than the PANI nanoarrays evaporator, with diameters of 4.0 cm and 3.0 cm, respectively. The mass change of the mixed solution and PANI nanoarrays evaporator were recorded by a high-accuracy electronic balance (METTLER TOLEDO ML204, 0.1 mg accuracy) and used to calculate the water evaporator rate and salt crystallization rate, respectively. The salt powder was collected and redissolved in water to measure the LiCl and MgCl2 content by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Agilent 5110).
The LiCl/MgCl2 separation factor was calculated by the following Eq. (2):
Where \({C}_{{LiCl}}\) and \({C}_{{MgC}{l}_{2}}\) represent the concentration of LiCl and MgCl2, respectively.
Lithium extraction from simulated salt-lake brine
The bine was prepared based on the typical geothermal brine composition at Uyuni salar brine57,58, in Bolivia, containing 268.0 g L−1 NaCl, 5.1 g L−1 LiCl, 66.1 g L−1 MgCl2, and 9.2 g L−1 CaCl2. The simulated salt-lake brine was used as the feed solution for the solar evaporator. Under continuous irradiation, salt crystals formed on the PANI layer surface and were collected once the surface was fully covered. 5 g of collected salt powders were added in 5 mL water to create an over-saturated solution. The pH value was adjusted to 11 using a saturated NaOH solution to remove any remaining Mg2+. The white precipitate was removed by centrifuge at 1467 g for 10 mins. Next, a saturated sodium oxalate solution was slowly added to the upper clear solution in order to remove any remaining small amount of Ca2+. The mixture was centrifuged again at 1467 g for 10 mins, and the upper clear solution was collected. Finally, a saturated Na2CO3 solution was added to the collected solution at 80 °C. The white precipitates were collected after centrifuge and dried in an air-forced oven at 60 °C for 12 h.
Data availability
All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article, the Supplementary Information and the Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Evans, K. Lithium, Critical Metals Handbook 2nd edn, Vol. 4 (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).
Li, Z. et al. Continuous electrical pumping membrane process for seawater lithium mining. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3152–3159 (2021).
Lang, J. et al. High-purity electrolytic lithium obtained from low-purity sources using solid electrolyte. Nat. Sustain. 3, 386–390 (2020).
He, L. et al. New insights into the application of lithium-ion battery materials: selective extraction of lithium from brines via a rocking-chair lithium-ion battery system. Glob. Chall. 2, 1700079 (2018).
Martin, G., Rentsch, L., Höck, M. & Bertau, M. Lithium market research—global supply, future demand and price development. Energy Stor. Mater. 6, 171–179 (2017).
Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001).
Liu, C. et al. Lithium extraction from seawater through pulsed electrochemical intercalation. Joule 4, 1459–1469 (2020).
Yang, S., Zhang, F., Ding, H., He, P. & Zhou, H. Lithium metal extraction from seawater. Joule 2, 1648–1651 (2018).
Desaulty, A.-M. et al. Tracing the origin of lithium in Li-ion batteries using lithium isotopes. Nat. Commun. 13, 4172 (2022).
Greim, P., Solomon, A. A. & Breyer, C. Assessment of lithium criticality in the global energy transition and addressing policy gaps in transportation. Nat. Commun. 11, 4570 (2020).
Xu, S. et al. Extraction of lithium from Chinese salt-lake brines by membranes: design and practice. J. Membr. Sci. 635, 119441 (2021).
Liu, G., Zhao, Z. & Ghahreman, A. Novel approaches for lithium extraction from salt-lake brines: a review. Hydrometallurgy 187, 81–100 (2019).
Zhao, X., Yang, H., Wang, Y. & Sha, Z. Review on the electrochemical extraction of lithium from seawater/brine. J. Electroanal. Chem. 850, 113389 (2019).
Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Yun, R. & Xiang, X. Recent advances in magnesium/lithium separation and lithium extraction technologies from salt lake brine. Sep. Purif. Technol. 256, 117807 (2021).
Park, S. H. et al. Lithium recovery from artificial brine using energy-efficient membrane distillation and nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 598, 117683 (2020).
Lu, D. et al. Constructing a selective blocked-nanolayer on nanofiltration membrane via surface-charge inversion for promoting Li+ permselectivity over Mg2+. J. Membr. Sci. 635, 119504 (2021).
Peng, H. & Zhao, Q. A nano-heterogeneous membrane for efficient separation of lithium from high magnesium/lithium ratio brine. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2009430 (2021).
Razmjou, A., Asadnia, M., Hosseini, E., Habibnejad Korayem, A. & Chen, V. Design principles of ion selective nanostructured membranes for the extraction of lithium ions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5793 (2019).
Wang, Z. et al. Nanoparticle-templated nanofiltration membranes for ultrahigh performance desalination. Nat. Commun. 9, 2004 (2018).
Cadotte, J., Forester, R., Kim, M., Petersen, R. & Stocker, T. Nanofiltration membranes broaden the use of membrane separation technology. Desalination 70, 77–88 (1988).
Han, S. et al. Microporous organic nanotube assisted design of high performance nanofiltration membranes. Nat. Commun. 13, 7954 (2022).
Zhu, Y. et al. Regulation of molecular transport in polymer membranes with voltage-controlled pore size at the angstrom scale. Nat. Commun. 14, 2373 (2023).
Xu, P., Hong, J., Xu, Z., Xia, H. & Ni, Q.-Q. Positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on (MWCNTs-COOK)-engineered substrate for fast and efficient lithium extraction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 270, 118796 (2021).
Liang, Y. et al. Polyamide nanofiltration membrane with highly uniform sub-nanometre pores for sub-1 Å precision separation. Nat. Commun. 11, 2015 (2020).
Bing, S. et al. Bio-inspired construction of ion conductive pathway in covalent organic framework membranes for efficient lithium extraction. Matter 4, 2027–2038 (2021).
Zhao, C. et al. Polyamide membranes with nanoscale ordered structures for fast permeation and highly selective ion-ion separation. Nat. Commun. 14, 1112 (2023).
Somrani, A., Hamzaoui, A. H. & Pontie, M. Study on lithium separation from salt lake brines by nanofiltration (NF) and low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO). Desalination 317, 184–192 (2013).
Foo, Z. H., Rehman, D., Bouma, A. T., Monsalvo, S. & Lienhard, J. H. Lithium concentration from salt-lake brine by Donnan-enhanced nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 6320–6330 (2023).
Tao, P. et al. Solar-driven interfacial evaporation. Nat. Energy 3, 1031–1041 (2018).
Wang, F. et al. A high-performing single-stage invert-structured solar water purifier through enhanced absorption and condensation. Joule 5, 1602–1612 (2021).
Zhao, F., Guo, Y., Zhou, X., Shi, W. & Yu, G. Materials for solar-powered water evaporation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 5, 388–401 (2020).
Qi, D. et al. Polymeric membranes with selective solution-diffusion for intercepting volatile organic compounds during solar-driven water remediation. Adv. Mater. 32, 2004401 (2020).
Zhang, P. et al. Super water-extracting gels for solar-powered volatile organic compounds management in the hydrological cycle. Adv. Mater. 34, 2110548 (2022).
Zhu, M. et al. Tree-inspired design for high-efficiency water extraction. Nature 29, 1704107 (2017).
Zhao, F. et al. Highly efficient solar vapour generation via hierarchically nanostructured gels. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 489–495 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Manipulating unidirectional fluid transportation to drive sustainable solar water extraction and brine-drenching induced energy generation. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 4891–4902 (2020).
Hu, Y. et al. A reconfigurable and magnetically responsive assembly for dynamic solar steam generation. Nat. Commun. 13, 4335 (2022).
Yang, H. et al. Tailoring the salt transport flux of solar evaporators for a highly effective salt-resistant desalination with high productivity. ACS Nano 16, 2511–2520 (2022).
Xia, Y. et al. Spatially isolating salt crystallisation from water evaporation for continuous solar steam generation and salt harvesting. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1840–1847 (2019).
Wu, L. et al. Highly efficient three-dimensional solar evaporator for high salinity desalination by localized crystallization. Nat. Commun. 11, 521 (2020).
Reef, R. & Lovelock, C. E. Regulation of water balance in mangroves. Ann. Bot. 115, 385–395 (2014).
Sobrado, M. A. Influence of external salinity on the osmolality of xylem sap, leaf tissue and leaf gland secretion of the mangrove Laguncularia racemosa (L.) Gaertn. Trees 18, 422–427 (2004).
Paliyavuth, C., Clough, B. & Patanaponpaiboon, P. Salt uptake and shoot water relations in mangroves. Aquat. Bot. 78, 349–360 (2004).
Wheeler, T. D. & Stroock, A. D. The transpiration of water at negative pressures in a synthetic tree. Nature 455, 208–212 (2008).
Wang, Y., Lee, J., Werber, J. R. & Elimelech, M. Capillary-driven desalination in a synthetic mangrove. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax5253 (2020).
Sui, H., Han, B.-G., Lee, J. K., Walian, P. & Jap, B. K. Structural basis of water-specific transport through the AQP1 water channel. Nature 414, 872–878 (2001).
Krishnamurthy, P. et al. Role of root hydrophobic barriers in salt exclusion of a mangrove plant Avicennia officinalis. Plant Cell Environ. 37, 1656–1671 (2014).
Semenova, G. A., Fomina, I. R. & Biel, K. Y. Structural features of the salt glands of the leaf of Distichlis spicata ‘Yensen 4a’ (Poaceae). Protoplasma 240, 75–82 (2010).
Yuan, F., Leng, B. & Wang, B. Progress in studying salt secretion from the salt glands in recretohalophytes: How do plants secrete salt? Front. Plant Sci. 7, 977 (2016).
Huang, J. & Kaner, R. B. Nanofiber formation in the chemical polymerization of aniline: a mechanistic study. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5817–5821 (2004).
Chiou, N. R. & Epstein, A. J. Polyaniline nanofibers prepared by dilute polymerization. Adv. Mater. 17, 1679–1683 (2005).
Peng, Y., Wang, Y., Li, W. & Jin, J. Bio-inspired vertically aligned polyaniline nanofiber layers enabling extremely high-efficiency solar membrane distillation for water purification. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 10678–10684 (2021).
Zhu, Y. et al. Single-walled carbon nanotube film supported nanofiltration membrane with a nearly 10 nm thick polyamide selective layer for high-flux and high-rejection desalination. Small 12, 5034–5041 (2016).
Nightingale, E. R. Jr. Phenomenological theory of ion solvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions. J. Phys. Chem. 63, 1381–1387 (1959).
Levenstein, R., Hasson, D. & Semiat, R. Utilization of the Donnan effect for improving electrolyte separation with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 116, 77–92 (1996).
Vezzani, D. & Bandini, S. Donnan equilibrium and dielectric exclusion for characterization of nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 149, 477–483 (2002).
Rettig, S. L., Jones, B. F. & Risacher, F. Geochemical evolution of brines in the salar of Uyuni, Bolivia. Chem. Geol. 30, 57–79 (1980).
An, J. W. et al. Recovery of lithium from Uyuni salar brine. Hydrometallurgy 117, 64–70 (2012).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFB3805900, 2022YFB3805903, 2023YFE0113700), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21988102, 22208229, 22072104), the Key Research and Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2022056), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20220501), Gusu Innovation and Entrepreneurship Leading Talent Plan (ZXL2023198).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.Z., J.L. and J.J. designed the experiments. X.W., S.Z. and X.C. performed the experiments including the fabrication of the PANI evaporator and PA membranes, characterization, and performance test. M.W. and M.P. provided suggestions and technical support. S.Z. and J.J. organized the data and wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and approved the final version of the article.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Amir Razmjou and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, S., Wei, X., Cao, X. et al. Solar-driven membrane separation for direct lithium extraction from artificial salt-lake brine. Nat Commun 15, 238 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44625-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44625-w
- Springer Nature Limited