Abstract
Alkene hydrocarbonation reactions have been developed to supplement traditional electrophile-nucleophile cross-coupling reactions. The branch-selective hydroalkylation method applied to a broad range of unactivated alkenes remains challenging. Herein, we report a NiH-catalysed proximal-selective hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes to access β- or γ-branched alkyl carboxylic acids and β-, γ- or δ-branched alkyl amines. A broad range of alkyl iodides and bromides with different functional groups can be installed with excellent regiocontrol and availability for site-selective late-stage functionalization of biorelevant molecules. Under modified reaction conditions with NiCl2(PPh3)2 as the catalyst, migratory hydroalkylation takes place to provide β- (rather than γ-) branched products. The keys to success are the use of aminoquinoline and picolinamide as suitable directing groups and combined experimental and computational studies of ligand effects on the regioselectivity and detailed reaction mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The construction of molecular skeletons by C(sp3)-centred coupling under mild conditions has been a goal in organic synthesis chemistry for a long time1,2. Increasing the number of saturated carbon centres is of positive significance to the success of clinical drug research3. Traditional C(sp3)-centred cross-coupling relies on alkyl metallic reagents4,5,6. However, commercial approaches to access alkyl metallic reagents are limited. The preparation of these reagents in the laboratory is time-consuming, and the operation under anhydrous and anaerobic harsh conditions is inconvenient7. In recent years, alkene hydrocarbonation reactions have been developed to supplement traditional electrophile-nucleophile cross-coupling reactions8,9. The in situ generation of a catalytic organometallic intermediate from alkenes instead of a stoichiometric metallic reagent to participate in C(sp3)-centred coupling simplifies the synthesis steps and routes and improves the functional group compatibility. Alkene hydroarylation(alkenylation) with simple arenes (ArH), aryl electrophile (ArX), or aryl nucleophile (ArM) delivered corresponding alkene addition products through various mechanistic pathways10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Remarkable advances were achieved in both linear- and branched-selective hydroarylations19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28. On the other hand, alkene hydroalkylation, enabling the rapid construction of alkyl-alkyl bonds, would broaden our horizon of retrosynthetic analysis when facing the pervasive C(sp3)–C(sp3) bonds in organic molecules1,2. Hydroalkylation of terminal alkenes has enjoyed success10,21,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. Increasing attention has been given to the hydroalkylation of internal alkenes, especially nickel-hydride catalysed processes (Fig. 1a). However, nickel-hydride migratory insertion is sensitive to alkene substrates’ steric and electronic properties. The rate of hydrometalation of unactivated internal alkenes is much slower than that of terminal alkenes37,38,39. Chain-walking isomerization often occurs in internal alkenes and causes linear-functionalized products40,41. Another successful approach is the hydrofunctionalization of activated (conjugated) alkenes42. The Lewis basic oxygen in the directing group or conjugated aryl or boryl group effectively stabilizes the alkylnickel intermediate, obtaining α-alkylated products with high regioselectivity43,44,45,46. A report on NiH-catalysed hydroalkylation of α,β-unsaturated amides to access β-alkylated products was also recently disclosed47. Despite the success of linear-selective migratory hydroalkylation of internal alkenes and α- or β-selective hydroalkylation of activated (conjugated) alkenes, the branch-selective hydroalkylation method applied to a broad range of unactivated alkenes remains challenging.
Amide-linked directing groups, such as aminoquinoline (AQ) and picolinamide (PA), are widely used in palladium-catalysed C-H functionalization48,49,50,51,52. In recent years, the directing group concept has been transplanted to the research field of alkene functionalizations53,54,55,56. Many functional groups, including boron, amine, aryl, and alkyl groups, have been successfully installed into the double bonds of unactivated alkenes using palladium or nickel catalysts21,22,57,58,59,60,61,62. For example, Engle and co-workers63 and Koh and co-workers64,65 independently reported the dicarbofunctionalization of nonconjugated alkenes with aminoquinoline directing groups. The directing group concept also opens up new directions for the NiH-catalysed hydrofunctionalization of unactivated internal alkenes15,23,66,67. Recently, Koh and co-workers made progress in NiH-catalysed branch-selective hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes using the aminoquinoline directing auxiliary. Alkene migratory hydroalkylation undergoes smoothly to access β-alkylated amides with excellent regioselectivity68. From the perspective of the previous literature, hydroalkylation of internal alkenes on a remote position to functional units (rather than α- or β-alkylation) remains challenging.
Herein, we report a NiH-catalysed proximal-selective hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes to access β- or γ-branched alkyl carboxylic acids and β-, γ- or δ-branched alkyl amines. Using NiCl2(PPh3)2 as the catalyst, migratory hydroalkylation takes place to provide β- (rather than γ-) branched products (Fig. 1b). A preliminary result with moderate enantioselectivity demonstrates that an asymmetric variant can be realized. The keys to success are the application of aminoquinoline and picolinamide as suitable directing groups and detailed studies of the ligand effects and reaction mechanisms.
Results and discussion
Reaction discovery
We commenced this study with alkene 1a and alkyl iodide 2a as the model substrates (Table 1). Amide-directed proximal-selective hydroalkylation was efficiently performed using NiBr2(diglyme) as the catalyst, MEA as the ligand, DEMS as the hydride source, KF as the base in a DMAc solvent (entry 1), and desired product 4aa was obtained in 90% GC (gas chromatography) yield, 87% isolated yield, and >20:1 r.r. (regioisomeric ratio). NiBr2(DME) and Ni(acac)2 could be used instead of NiBr2(diglyme) as catalysts (entries 2–3), but NiCl2(PPh3)2, which would introduce a phosphine ligand into the reaction system, led to a dramatic negative effect on regioselectivity (entry 4). Oxygen-bearing silanes, such as (MeO)3SiH and PMHS (entries 5–6), gave good yields; Ph2SiH2 also performed well (entry 7), but the less electrophilic hydrosilane MeEt2SiH was inefficient in this transformation (entry 8). KF turned out to be the best base over the other bases (entries 9–12), such as Na2CO3, CsF, NaHCO3, and K3PO4(H2O), because of its matched ability to activate DEMS to form pentacoordinate hydrosilicate species. We could regulate the reaction activity through the cross-combination of different bases and silanes. This reaction is sensitive to solvent identity (entries 13–17); an excellent yield was obtained in DMF, which is an amide solvent (entry 13), while poor results were obtained using MeCN, DCE, or toluene (entries 14–16), and disappointing regioselectivity was obtained when using THF as the solvent (entry 17). Finally, this reaction was completely shut down in the control experiment without a nickel catalyst (entry 18).
Substrate scope
With appropriate reaction conditions in hand, we sought to examine the substrate scope of this amide-directed nickel-catalysed hydroalkylation. As summarized in Fig. 2, a wide range of alkyl halides and alkenes was examined and provided satisfying coupling yields (40–88%) and regioselectivities (4.0:1~>20:1) in almost all cases. Both alkyl iodides 2a-2l, 2n, 2q-2s and bromides 3a, 3m, 3o, 3p, and 3t were suitable substrates, and 0.5 equiv NaI was added for the in situ generation of the corresponding alkyl iodides from alkyl bromides. The β-branched alkyl halides (2b and 2c) delivered products in slightly diminished yields and equally good regioselectivities. Concerning alkenes, both terminal (1a) and internal alkenes with differentiated steric resistances (1b–1g, 1i–1l) could be used. The Z/E configuration of the internal alkene would not affect the coupling yield or regioselectivity (4ba). In addition, the trisubstituted alkene (1g), which is difficult for nickel-hydride insertion, could be transformed in a moderate yield. An interesting example was 4la. The alkene substrate 1l with a potentially competitive activated benzylic reaction site delivered the desired amide-directed γ-alkylation product with high regioselectivity, indicating that the aminoquinoline auxiliary displayed stronger directing ability compared to an aromatic ring. In another example, the derivative of but-3-enoic acid (1m) was selectively converted to the β-branched product 4ma following proximal hydroalkylation selectivity. Finally, picolinamide as an auxiliary also produced gratifying proximal hydroalkylation results (β-alkylation product 4na, γ-alkylation product 4oa, and δ-alkylation product 4pa) under standard conditions. However, the moderate regioisomeric ratios (4.0:1~4.8:1) need further reaction condition optimization. A variety of functional groups were well accommodated, such as trifluoromethyl (4ad), ester (4ae), ether (4af, 4ag and 4ea), and cyano (4ah, and 4ai) groups. Under mild reaction conditions, many sensitive functional groups could be tolerated, including base-sensitive ketones (4aj and 4ak) and acid-sensitive tert-butoxycarbonyl (4al) and propylidene (4ka) protecting groups. Phosphonate (4am) and internal alkenyl groups (4an) were compatible during the transformation. Heterocyclic compounds such as thiophene (4ao), indole (4ap), tetrahydropyran (4ia), and furan (4ja) posed no problems. Electrophilic aryl chloride (4aq) and aryl bromide (4ar), as well as nucleophilic arylboronate (4as) survived, providing the possibility for further transformation through transition-metal-catalysed cross-coupling reactions. Finally, this reaction could be conducted in the presence of an unprotected hydroxyl group (4at), demonstrating its high degree of compatibility with sensitive functional groups. We examined several secondary and tertiary electrophiles (see Supplementary Table 5 and Supplementary Fig. 20 for more details). For the reaction using iodocyclohexane as an electrophile, the hydroalkylation product was delivered in a 23% yield (2.4:1 r.r.) along with the alkene protonation byproduct in a 38% yield; slight modification using (MeO)3SiH as hydride source gave out a 35% total yield (1.9:1 r.r.). For the reaction using tertiary electrophiles, such as 2-iodo-2-methylpropane, 2-bromo-2-methylpropane, and 1-bromoadamantane, the desired hydroalkylation products were not observed. In the example of trisubstituted alkene 4ga, a secondary-primary C(sp3)-C(sp3) bond formed with a moderate yield. However, the attempted construction of a tertiary-primary C(sp3)-C(sp3) bond failed in the examination of 1,1-disubstituted alkene and tetrasubstituted alkene (see Supplementary Fig. 21 for more details). Therefore, this reaction might be sensitive to the steric hindrance of both alkyl halides and alkene substrates.
Synthetic applications
We explored the usefulness of this hydroalkylation reaction as an efficient method for the late-stage modification of biorelevant molecules (Fig. 3a). Alkyl halides derived from drug molecules and natural products, such as indomethacin, lithocholic acid, methylumbelliferone, and D-galactopyranoside, underwent the hydroalkylation process smoothly with high chemoselectivity and good yields. The tolerance of aryl chloride, acetal groups, and unprotected alcohol hydroxyl groups highlights the excellent compatibility with sensitive functional groups. In a scale-up reaction (Fig. 3b), we achieved alkene hydroalkylation product 4aa with a satisfactory 78% isolated yield and 12:1 regioselectivity. Under mild nickel-catalysed conditions, the directing amide group was transformed into a methyl ester group to deliver the desired methyl carboxylate 5a in a 70% isolated yield. After hydrolysis of 4aa in hydrochloric acid solution, alkyl carboxylic acid 5b was obtained in a 73% isolated yield with 96% aminoquinoline recovered. The gram-scale reaction and successful removal of the directing group highlight the practicality of this nickel-catalysed alkyl-alkyl coupling reaction.
Mechanistic studies
We carried out a series of control and mechanistic experiments to elucidate the reaction mechanism (Fig. 4). In the radical clock experiment (Fig. 4a) using (bromomethyl)cyclopropane (3y) as an electrophile, coupling product 4ay originating from the ring-opening of the cyclopropylmethyl radical was detected. When 6-iodohex-1-ene (2z) was subjected to the standard conditions, we observed that the expected ring-cyclized product 4az originated from the cyclization of the 5-hexenyl radical. These data support the radical nature of this reductive hydroalkylation reaction. In the isotope labelling experiment (Fig. 4b) with Ph2SiD2 (97% deuterium content) under standard conditions, deuterium was incorporated exclusively at the terminal position with a 95% deuterium content, indicating that hydrogen is provided by hydrosilane via the generation of NiH species. In addition, we experimented with δ,δ-dideuterated alkene d2-1a. The δ-position deuterium atoms in the dideuterated substrate remained intact, and no H/D exchange was observed along the alkyl chain. Next, we examined the influence of nitrogen-containing ligands on the coupling yield and regioselectivity (Fig. 4c). This reaction could be conducted in the absence of ethanolamine ligand or by using ethylenediamine (L1), butylamine (L2), or aniline (L3) as the ligand. However, diminished 5.3:1~7.8:1 regioisomeric ratios demonstrated the significance of ethanolamine (MEA) in regulating the regioselectivity. Moreover, bidentate bipyridine (L4) and tridentate terpyridine (L5) ligands showed a conspicuous decline in coupling efficiency and regioselectivity. This could be attributed to the excessive occupation of the coordination space on the nickel centre. In a preliminary experiment using chiral diamine ligand L6 (Fig. 4d), this proximal-selective hydroalkylation reaction could be realized with moderate enantioselectivity (see Supplementary Tables 2 and 3 for more details). More efforts are needed to improve enantioselectivity. Note that chiral diamine ligands, including but not limited to L6, could be conveniently synthesized from the corresponding imines using Tang and Xu’s method69. Inspired by the precedents of Koh and others15,67,68, we focused our attention on investigating the ligand effect of phosphine ligands (Fig. 4e). Both PPh3 and PMe3 altered the regioselectivity, and migratory β-alkylated amide (6aa) was isolated as the main product. After performing systematic screening of the influence of other reaction parameters, we determined that NiCl2(PPh3)2 as the catalyst, (MeO)3SiH as the hydride source, KF as the base, and in DMAc solvent provided a moderate 50% GC yield and 42% isolated yield with an excellent 19:1 β-alkylation selectivity (6aa). Representative substrates from the different dimensions of the directing group (6ra), chain length (6qa), and an internal alkene with considerable steric hindrance (6ca) smoothly underwent the desired migratory hydroalkylation, demonstrating the generality and portability of the phosphine ligand-dominated β-alkylation selectivity (Fig. 4f).
DFT calculations
Based on previous literature and our experiments, we proposed two possible catalytic cycles for the proximal-selectivity hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes (Fig. 5a)31,43,44,45,66,68,70. In the left catalytic cycle, Ni(I)X (A) was generated as an initial catalyst under the reductive conditions. Subsequently, Ni(I)X (A) was associated with an alkene to form a chelated Ni(I) species (B) which reacted with silane to generate a crucial Ni(I)-H species (C). Then, the Ni(I)-H is inserted into the C-C double bond via a six- or seven-membered-ring mode, which controls alkylation position to offer Ni(I) species D-1 or D-2. The resulting D-1 abstracted halogen from an alkyl halide to form Ni(II) and an alkyl radical. The alkyl radical was trapped to give Ni(III) species (F), which underwent rapid reductive elimination to obtain the target product and regenerate catalyst A. Another possible catalytic cycle is shown on the right. Initially, Ni(I)X (A) reacted with an alkyl halide through halide abstraction to afford Ni(II) (B’) and an alkyl radical. Then, silane reacted with B’ to generate the Ni(II)-H (C’), which chelated with an alkene to give Ni(II) species (D’). D’ inserted into an alkene and captured the alkyl radical, followed by reductive elimination to obtain the target product (D’ → E’ → F). Preliminary DFT calculations indicate that the migration insertion of the Ni(II)-H bond into the terminal alkene group generating branched products via a six-membered-ring mode (TS1 in Fig. 5b, barrier: 7.3 kcal/mol) is remarkably more facile than that of the seven-membered-ring-mode generating linear products (TS2, barrier: 16.2 kcal/mol). This result correlates with the preferential hydrogen atom incorporation on the terminal carbon atom observed experimentally. By contrast, the linear migration insertion process on Ni(I) system is excluded due to its high energy demands (TS4, barrier: 25.4 kcal/mol). However, Ni(I)-catalysed six-membered-ring migration insertion generating branched products is also possible under experimental conditions (TS3, barrier: 15.3 kcal/mol). Optimized 3D structures of TS1, TS2, TS3 and TS4 are shown in Fig. 5c. Totally, the energies for migration insertion steps in Ni(II)-H pathway are lower than that in Ni(I)-H pathway, but the possibility of Ni(I)-H pathway could not be ruled out at this stage.
In summary, we describe a nickel-catalysed proximal-selective hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes to provide a retrosynthetic method for valuable β- or γ-branched alkyl carboxylic acid and β-, γ- or δ-branched alkyl amine building blocks. The sensible employment of aminoquinoline and picolinamide as suitable directing groups enables the hydroalkylation of both unactivated terminal and internal alkenes. A broad range of alkyl iodides and bromides with different functional groups can be installed with excellent regiocontrol to be available for site-selective late-stage functionalization of biorelevant molecules. Under modified reaction conditions using NiCl2(PPh3)2 as the catalyst, migratory β-selective hydroalkylation can also be realized. Mechanistic studies and DFT calculations illuminate the ligand effects on regioselectivity and the detailed reaction mechanism. Further efforts on the catalytic asymmetric variant of this transformation are ongoing in our laboratory.
Methods
General procedure for proximal-selective hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes
In air, a 10 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a stir bar was charged with NiBr2(diglyme) (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%), KF (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), alkene (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv), and alkyl halide (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv) (0.5 equiv NaI was added when alkyl bromide was used). The Schlenk tube was evacuated and filled with argon (three cycles). To these solids, a solution of ethanolamine (0.024 mmol, 12 mol%) in anhydrous DMAc (1.0 mL) was added under an argon atmosphere. Then, DEMS (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv) (if the alkene or alkyl halide was liquid, it was also added at this time) was added under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at 25 °C or 40 °C for 12 h, diluted with H2O followed by extraction with ethyl acetate, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography to produce the target product.
General procedure for migratory hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes
In air, a 10 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a stir bar was charged with NiCl2(PPh3)2 (0.02 mmol, 10 mol%), KF (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv), alkene (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), and alkyl halide (0.2 mmol, 1.0 equiv). The Schlenk tube was evacuated and filled with argon (three cycles). To these solids, anhydrous DMAc (1.0 mL) was added under an argon atmosphere. Then, (MeO)3SiH (0.6 mmol, 3.0 equiv) (if the alkene or alkyl halide was liquid, it was also added at this time) was added under an argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred at 100 °C for 12 h, diluted with H2O followed by extraction with ethyl acetate, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography to produce the target product.
Data availability
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information files or from the corresponding author upon request. The experimental procedures, computational results and characterization of all new compounds are provided in the Supplementary Information.
References
Geist, E., Kirschning, A. & Schmidt, T. sp3-sp3 Coupling reactions in the synthesis of natural products and biologically active molecules. Nat. Prod. Rep. 31, 441–448 (2014).
Choi, J. & Fu, G. C. Transition metal-catalyzed alkyl-alkyl bond formation: another dimension in cross-coupling chemistry. Science 356, eaaf7230 (2017).
Lovering, F. Escape from Flatland 2: complexity and promiscuity. Med. Chem. Commun. 4, 515–519 (2013).
Jana, R., Pathak, T. P. & Sigman, M. S. Advances in transition metal (Pd,Ni,Fe)-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions using alkyl-organometallics as reaction partners. Chem. Rev. 111, 1417–1492 (2011).
Tasker, S. Z., Standley, E. A. & Jamison, T. F. Recent advances in homogeneous nickel catalysis. Nature 509, 299–309 (2014).
Cherney, A. H., Kadunce, N. T. & Reisman, S. E. Enantioselective and enantiospecific transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organometallic reagents to construct C-C bonds. Chem. Rev. 115, 9587–9652 (2015).
Maksymowicz, R. M., Roth, P. M. C. & Fletcher, S. P. Catalytic asymmetric carbon–carbon bond formation using alkenes as alkylmetal equivalents. Nat. Chem. 4, 649–654 (2012).
Wang, X.-X., Lu, X., Li, Y., Wang, J.-W. & Fu, Y. Recent advances in nickel-catalyzed reductive hydroalkylation and hydroarylation of electronically unbiased alkenes. Sci. China Chem. 63, 1586–1600 (2020).
He, Y., Chen, J., Jiang, X. & Zhu, S. Enantioselective NiH-catalyzed reductive hydrofunctionalization of alkenes. Chin. J. Chem. 40, 651–661 (2022).
Lu, X. et al. Practical carbon-carbon bond formation from olefins through nickel-catalyzed reductive olefin hydrocarbonation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11129 (2016).
Green, S. A., Matos, J. L. M., Yagi, A. & Shenvi, R. A. Branch-selective hydroarylation: iodoarene–olefin cross-coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 12779–12782 (2016).
Friis, S. D., Pirnot, M. T., Dupuis, L. N. & Buchwald, S. L. A dual palladium and copper hydride catalyzed approach for alkyl-aryl cross-coupling of aryl halides and olefins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7242–7246 (2017).
Boyington, A. J., Riu, M.-L. Y. & Jui, N. T. Anti-Markovnikov hydroarylation of unactivated olefins via pyridyl radical intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 6582–6585 (2017).
He, Y., Cai, Y. & Zhu, S. Mild and regioselective benzylic C-H functionalization: Ni-catalyzed reductive arylation of remote and proximal olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 1061–1064 (2017).
Lv, H. et al. Nickel-catalyzed intermolecular oxidative Heck arylation driven by transfer hydrogenation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5025 (2019).
Saper, N. I. et al. Nickel-catalysed anti-Markovnikov hydroarylation of unactivated alkenes with unactivated arenes facilitated by non-covalent interactions. Nat. Chem. 12, 276–283 (2020).
Wang, D.-M., Feng, W., Wu, Y., Liu, T. & Wang, P. Redox-neutral nickel(II) catalysis: hydroarylation of unactivated alkenes with arylboronic acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 20399–20404 (2020).
Liu, C.-F., Luo, X., Wang, H. & Koh, M. J. Catalytic regioselective olefin hydroarylation(alkenylation) by sequential carbonickelation-hydride transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 9498–9506 (2021).
Bair, J. S. et al. Linear-selective hydroarylation of unactivated terminal and internal olefins with trifluoromethyl-substituted arenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 13098–13101 (2014).
Ma, X. & Herzon, S. B. Intermolecular hydropyridylation of unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8718–8721 (2016).
O’Duill, M. L. et al. Tridentate directing groups stabilize 6-membered palladacycles in catalytic alkene hydrofunctionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 15576–15579 (2017).
Wang, C. et al. Palladium-catalyzed regiocontrollable reductive Heck reaction of unactivated aliphatic alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 9332–9336 (2018).
Lv, H., Xiao, L.-J., Zhao, D. & Zhou, Q.-L. Nickel(0)-catalyzed linear-selective hydroarylation of unactivated alkenes and styrenes with aryl boronic acids. Chem. Sci. 9, 6839–6843 (2018).
Nguyen, J., Chong, A. & Lalic, G. Nickel-catalyzed anti-Markovnikov hydroarylation of alkenes. Chem. Sci. 10, 3231–3236 (2019).
Li, Z.-Q. et al. Ligand-controlled regiodivergence in nickel-catalyzed hydroarylation and hydroalkenylation of alkenyl carboxylic acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 23306–23312 (2020).
Li, Z.-Q., Apolinar, O., Deng, R. & Engle, K. M. Directed Markovnikov hydroarylation and hydroalkenylation of alkenes under nickel catalysis. Chem. Sci. 12, 11038–11044 (2021).
He, Y., Liu, C., Yu, L. & Zhu, S. Enantio- and regioselective NiH-catalyzed reductive hydroarylation of vinylarenes with aryl iodides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 21530–21534 (2020).
Zhang, Y. et al. A relay catalysis strategy for enantioselective nickel-catalyzed migratory hydroarylation forming chiral α-aryl alkylboronates. Chem 7, 3171–3188 (2021).
DeLuca, R. J. & Sigman, M. S. Anti-Markovnikov hydroalkylation of allylic amine derivatives via a palladium-catalyzed reductive cross-coupling reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11454–11457 (2011).
Yamauchi, D., Nishimura, T. & Yorimitsu, H. Hydroxoiridium-catalyzed hydroalkylation of terminal alkenes with ureas by C(sp3)-H bond activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7200–7204 (2017).
Wang, Z., Yin, H. & Fu, G. C. Catalytic enantioconvergent coupling of secondary and tertiary electrophiles with olefins. Nature 563, 379–383 (2018).
Green, S. A., Huffman, T. R., McCourt, R. O., van der Puyl, V. & Shenvi, R. A. Hydroalkylation of olefins to form quaternary carbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7709–7714 (2019).
He, S.-J. et al. Nickel-catalyzed enantioconvergent reductive hydroalkylation of olefins with α-heteroatom phosphorus or sulfur alkyl electrophiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 214–221 (2020).
Yang, Z.-P. & Fu, G. C. Convergent catalytic asymmetric synthesis of esters of chiral dialkyl carbinols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 5870–5875 (2020).
Shi, L., Xing, L.-L., Hu, W.-B. & Shu, W. Regio- and enantioselective ni-catalyzed formal hydroalkylation, hydrobenzylation, and hydropropargylation of acrylamides to α-tertiary amides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 1599–1604 (2021).
Ravn, A. K., Johansen, M. B. & Skrydstrup, T. Regioselective hydroalkylation of vinylarenes by cooperative Cu and Ni catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202112390 (2022).
Vasseur, A., Bruffaerts, J. & Marek, I. Remote functionalization through alkene isomerization. Nat. Chem. 8, 209–219 (2016).
Sommer, H., Juliá-Hernández, F., Martin, R. & Marek, I. Walking metals for remote functionalization. ACS Cent. Sci. 4, 153–165 (2018).
Janssen-Müller, D., Sahoo, B., Sun, S.-Z. & Martin, R. Tackling remote sp3 C−H functionalization via Ni-catalyzed “chain-walking” reactions. Isr. J. Chem. 60, 195–206 (2020).
Sun, S.-Z., Börjesson, M., Martin-Montero, R. & Martin, R. Site-selective Ni-catalyzed reductive coupling of α-haloboranes with unactivated olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 12765–12769 (2018).
Zhou, F., Zhang, Y., Xu, X. & Zhu, S. NiH-catalyzed remote asymmetric hydroalkylation of alkenes with racemic α-bromo amides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 1754–1758 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. Cobalt-catalysed enantioselective C(sp3)-C(sp3) coupling. Nat. Catal. 4, 901–911 (2021).
Wang, X.-X. et al. NiH-catalyzed reductive hydrocarbonation of enol esters and ethers. CCS Chem. 4, 605–615 (2022).
Bera, S., Mao, R. & Hu, X. Enantioselective C(sp3)–C(sp3) cross-coupling of non-activated alkyl electrophiles via nickel hydride catalysis. Nat. Chem. 13, 270–277 (2021).
Wang, J.-W. et al. Catalytic asymmetric reductive hydroalkylation of enamides and enecarbamates to chiral aliphatic amines. Nat. Commun. 12, 1313 (2021).
Wang, S. et al. Enantioselective access to chiral aliphatic amines and alcohols via Ni-catalyzed hydroalkylations. Nat. Commun. 12, 2771 (2021).
Zhou, F. & Zhu, S. Catalytic asymmetric hydroalkylation of α,β-unsaturated amides enabled by regio-reversed and enantiodifferentiating syn-hydronickellation. ACS Catal. 11, 8766–8773 (2021).
He, G., Wang, B., Nack, W. A. & Chen, G. Syntheses and transformations of α-amino acids via palladium-catalyzed auxiliary-directed sp3 C-H functionalization. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 635–645 (2016).
Zhang, Q. & Shi, B.-F. Site-selective functionalization of remote aliphatic C–H bonds via C–H metallation. Chem. Sci. 12, 841–852 (2021).
Daugulis, O., Roane, J. & Tran, L. D. Bidentate, monoanionic auxiliary-directed functionalization of carbon–hydrogen bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1053–1064 (2015).
Zhang, Q. & Shi, B.-F. 2-(Pyridin-2-yl)isopropyl (PIP) amine: an enabling directing group for divergent and asymmetric functionalization of unactivated methylene C(sp3)-H bonds. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 2750–2763 (2021).
Rouquet, G. & Chatani, N. Catalytic functionalization of C(sp2)-H and C(sp3)-H bonds by using bidentate directing groups. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 11726–11743 (2013).
Dhungana, R. K., KC, S., Basnet, P. & Giri, R. Transition metal-catalyzed dicarbofunctionalization of unactivated olefins. Chem. Rec. 18, 1314–1340 (2018).
Derosa, J., Apolinar, O., Kang, T., Tran, V. T. & Engle, K. M. Recent developments in nickel-catalyzed intermolecular dicarbofunctionalization of alkenes. Chem. Sci. 11, 4287–4296 (2020).
Dhungana, R. K., Sapkota, R. R., Niroula, D. & Giri, R. Walking metals: catalytic difunctionalization of alkenes at nonclassical sites. Chem. Sci. 11, 9757–9774 (2020).
Wickham, L. M. & Giri, R. Transition metal (Ni, Cu, Pd)-catalyzed alkene dicarbofunctionalization reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 3415–3437 (2021).
Liu, Z. et al. Catalytic intermolecular carboamination of unactivated alkenes via directed aminopalladation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 11261–11270 (2017).
Tran, V. T., Gurak, J. A., Yang, K. S. & Engle, K. M. Activation of diverse carbon–heteroatom and carbon–carbon bonds via palladium(II)-catalysed β-X elimination. Nat. Chem. 10, 1126–1133 (2018).
Liu, Z., Ni, H.-Q., Zeng, T. & Engle, K. M. Catalytic carbo- and aminoboration of alkenyl carbonyl compounds via five- and six-membered palladacycles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 3223–3227 (2018).
van der Puyl, V. A., Derosa, J. & Engle, K. M. Directed, nickel-catalyzed Umpolung 1,2-carboamination of alkenyl carbonyl compounds. ACS Catal. 9, 224–229 (2019).
Nimmagadda, S. K. et al. Catalytic, enantioselective α-alkylation of azlactones with nonconjugated alkenes by directed nucleopalladation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 3923–3927 (2019).
Liu, Z. et al. Palladium(0)-catalyzed directed syn-1,2-carboboration and -silylation: alkene scope, applications in dearomatization, and stereocontrol by a chiral auxiliary. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 17068–17073 (2019).
Derosa, J., Tran, V. T., Boulous, M. N., Chen, J. S. & Engle, K. M. Nickel-catalyzed β,γ-dicarbofunctionalization of alkenyl carbonyl compounds via conjunctive cross-coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 10657–10660 (2017).
Yang, T., Chen, X., Rao, W. & Koh, M. J. Broadly applicable directed catalytic reductive difunctionalization of alkenyl carbonyl compounds. Chem 6, 738–751 (2020).
Yang, T. et al. Chemoselective union of olefins, organohalides, and redox-active esters enables regioselective alkene dialkylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 21410–21419 (2020).
Jeon, J., Lee, C., Seo, H. & Hong, S. NiH-catalyzed proximal-selective hydroamination of unactivated alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 20470–20480 (2020).
Lee, C., Seo, H., Jeon, J. & Hong, S. γ-Selective C(sp3)–H amination via controlled migratory hydroamination. Nat. Commun. 12, 5657 (2021).
Chen, X., Rao, W., Yang, T. & Koh, M. J. Alkyl halides as both hydride and alkyl sources in catalytic regioselective reductive olefin hydroalkylation. Nat. Commun. 11, 5857 (2020).
Zhou, M. et al. Enantioselective reductive coupling of imines templated by chiral diboron. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 10337–10342 (2020).
Du, B., Ouyang, Y., Chen, Q. & Yu, W.-Y. Thioether-directed NiH-catalyzed remote γ-C(sp3)–H hydroamidation of alkenes by 1,4,2-dioxazol-5-ones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 14962–14968 (2021).
Acknowledgements
This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 21732006, 51821006, and 51961135104 to Y.F. and grant number 21927814 to X.L.), the USTC Research Funds of the Double First-Class Initiative (grant number YD3530002002 to X.L.) and the CAS Collaborative Innovation Program of Hefei Science Center (grant number 2021HSC-CIP004 to Y.F. and X.L.). The numerical calculations in this paper have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of the University of Science and Technology of China. X.L. wishes to acknowledge Zhenhua Gu (USTC) for insightful mechanistic discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.L. and Y.F. directed the project. Y.F. directed and Y.-T.X. performed the DFT calculations. X.L. conceived the idea, designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. X.-X.W. and Z.-L.Z. performed the synthetic experiments. All of the authors participated in the discussion and preparation of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, XX., Xu, YT., Zhang, ZL. et al. NiH-catalysed proximal-selective hydroalkylation of unactivated alkenes and the ligand effects on regioselectivity. Nat Commun 13, 1890 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29554-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29554-4
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Ligand-controlled NiH-catalyzed regiodivergent hydroalkylation of 2-alkenylazaarenes
Science China Chemistry (2024)
-
Recent Progress in NiH-Catalyzed Linear or Branch Hydrofunctionalization of Terminal or Internal Alkenes
Topics in Current Chemistry (2023)