Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pudendal nerve block prior to inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: decreased intra-operative narcotic requirements

  • Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Impotence Research Submit manuscript

Abstract

The opioid epidemic has proven to be a public health crisis over the past two decades and efforts to decrease opioid exposure are sorely needed. Our objective was to determine whether pudendal nerve block utilization in the immediate pre-operative setting decreases intra-operative opioid analgesic requirements in veteran patients undergoing a primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation between January 2017 and July 2020 at the Charlie Norwood Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Augusta, GA. Univariable and multivariable gamma regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between pudendal nerve block utilization and intra-operative opioid analgesic requirements. The study cohort consisted of 110 patients, 35 (31.8%) of whom underwent a pudendal nerve block. Median intra-operative opioid analgesic requirements were significantly lower in the pudendal nerve block group (16.3 versus 25.8 morphine milliequivalents, p = 0.037). Receipt of the nerve block was associated with significantly lower intra-operative opioid analgesic requirements on multivariable (coefficient 0.84, p = 0.038) regression analysis. There was no significant difference in post-operative opioid analgesic requirements (p = 0.18). In conclusion, pre-operative pudendal nerve blocks decrease intra-operative opioid analgesic requirements in veteran patients undergoing a primary inflatable penile prosthesis implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lyden J, Binswanger IA. The United States opioid epidemic. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43:123–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gounder, C. Who is responsible for the pain-pill epidemic? https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/who-is-responsible-forthe-pain-pill-epidemic. Published November 8, 2013. Accessed November 27, 2020.

  3. US Department of Health and Human Services. Addressing prescription drug abuse in the United States: current activities and future opportunities. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdf/hhs_prescription_drug_abuse_report_09.2013.pdf. Published September 2013. Accessed November 27, 2020.

  4. Compton WM, Jones CM, Baldwin GT. Relationship between nonmedical prescription-opioid use and heroin use. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:154–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gallagher RM. Advancing the pain agenda in the veteran population. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34:357–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gellad WF, Good CB, Shulkin DJ. Addressing the Opioid Epidemic in the United States: Lessons from the Department of Veterans Affairs. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177:611–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thiels CA, Anderson SS, Ubl DS, Hanson KT, Bergquist WJ, Gray RJ, et al. Wide Variation and Overprescription of Opioids after Elective Surgery. Ann Surg. 2017;266:564–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lucas J, Gross M, Yafi F, DeLay K, Christianson S, El-Khatib FM, et al. A Multi-institutional Assessment of Multimodal Analgesia in Penile Implant Recipients Demonstrates Dramatic Reduction in Pain Scores and Narcotic Usage. J Sex Med. 2020;17:518–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Raynor MC, Smith A, Vyas SN, Selph JP, Carson CC 3rd. Dorsal penile nerve block prior to inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Sex Med. 2012;9:2975–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie D, Nicholson M, Azaiza M, Gheiler V, Lopez I, Nehrenz GM, et al. Effect of operative local anesthesia on postoperative pain outcomes of inflatable penile prosthesis: prospective comparison of two medications. Int J Impot Res. 2018;30:93–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghanavatian S, Derian A. Pudendal Nerve Block. [Updated 2020 Jul 31]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551518/

  12. Rojo EG, Gomez BG, Manfredi C, Isa MA, Polo JM, Miguel MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of dorsal penile nerve block before collagenase of clostridium histolyticum injections in peyronie’s disease patients: results from a prospective pilot study. Andrologia. 2020;52:e13740.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu G, Hsieh C, Wen H, Chen SC, Chen YC, Liu LJ, et al. Outpatient penile implantation with the patient under a novel method of crural block. Int J Androl. 2004;27:147–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsu G, Hsieh C, Chen H, Ling PY, Wen HS, Liu LJ, et al. The advancement of pure local anesthesia for penile surgeries: can an outpatient basis be sustainable? J Androl. 2007;28:200–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cotta BH, Welliver C, Brahmamdam A, Bednarchik CL, Dynda D, Kohler TS. Long-acting liposomal bupivacaine decreases inpatient narcotic requirements in men undergoing penile prosthesis implantation. Turk J Urol. 2016;42:230–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsu G, Zaid UX, Hsieh C, Huang S. Acupuncture assisted local anesthesia for penile surgeries. Transl Androl Urol. 2013;2:291–300.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Georgia-Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA

    Rashid K. Sayyid, Michael D. Oberle, Katherine L. Fratino, Martha K. Terris, Zachary Klaassen & Sherita A. King

  2. Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA

    Nathaniel S. Taylor & Jeunice Owens-Walton

Authors
  1. Rashid K. Sayyid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathaniel S. Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jeunice Owens-Walton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael D. Oberle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Katherine L. Fratino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Martha K. Terris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zachary Klaassen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sherita A. King
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: RKS, MKT, ZK, SAK. Acquisition of data: NST, JO, MDO, KLF. Analysis and interpretation of data: RKS, NST, JO, MDO, KLF, MKT, ZK, SAK. Drafting paper: RKS. Critical revision of paper for important intellectual content: NST, JO, MDO, KLF, MKT, ZK, SAK. Final approval of paper: RKS, NST, JO, MDO, KLF, MKT, ZK, SAK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashid K. Sayyid.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayyid, R.K., Taylor, N.S., Owens-Walton, J. et al. Pudendal nerve block prior to inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: decreased intra-operative narcotic requirements. Int J Impot Res 35, 1–5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00495-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-021-00495-8

  • Springer Nature Limited

This article is cited by

Search

Navigation