Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictive power of home blood pressure measurement for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: KAMOGAWA-HBP study

  • Article
  • Published:
Hypertension Research Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our previous study showed that the morning systolic blood pressure target should be <120 mmHg to prevent the onset or progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this study, we examined the prognostic values of home and clinical blood pressure for first cardiovascular events in the same cohort. Morning and evening home blood pressure measurements were obtained in triplicate for 14 consecutive days from the beginning of the study in a retrospective cohort of 1081 type 2 diabetes patients (44.5% women; median age 66.0 years) with no history of macrovascular complications. The first major cardiovascular event was the primary endpoint; the risk was examined by the Cox proportional hazards model. After a mean follow-up of 6.63 years, first-time cardiovascular events occurred in 119 patients (incidence, 16.6/1000 patient-years). Baseline morning systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio: 1.14, 95% CI 1.01–1.28) significantly predicted cardiovascular events, whereas clinical blood pressure did not. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with morning systolic blood pressure ≥135 mmHg tended to be higher than that in those with morning systolic blood pressure <125 mmHg [1.67 (0.94–2.97)]. Elevated home blood pressure measurement is a predictor of future cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes patients and may be superior to clinical blood pressure measurement in this regard.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Eliasson B, Svensson AM, Miftaraj M, et al. Mortality and cardiovascular disease in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1407–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Haffner SM, Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Mortality from coronary heart disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes and in nondiabetic subjects with and without prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:229–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel AV, Bernstein L, Deka A, Feigelson HS, Campbell PT, Gapstur SM, et al. Leisure time spent sitting in relation to total mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:419–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Takashima N, Ohkubo T, Miura K, Okamura T, Murakami Y, Fujiyoshi A, et al. NIPPON DATA80 Research Group. Long-term risk of BP values above normal for cardiovascular mortality: a 24-year observation of Japanese aged 30 to 92 years. J Hypertens. 2012;30:2299–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Satoh M, Maeda T, Hoshide S, Ohkubo T. Is antihypertensive treatment based on home blood pressure recommended rather than that based on office blood pressure in adults with essential hypertension? (meta-analysis). Hypertens Res. 2019;42:807–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ushigome E, Hamaguchi M, Matsumoto S, Oyabu C, Omoto A, Tanaka T, et al. Optimal home SBP targets for preventing the progression of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Hypertens. 2015;33:1853–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ushigome E, Fukui M, Hamaguchi M, Senmaru T, Sakabe K, Tanaka M, et al. The coefficient variation of home blood pressure is a novel factor associated with macroalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hypertens Res. 2011;34:1271–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ushigome E, Matsumoto S, Oyabu C, Kitagawa N, Tanaka T, Hasegawa G, et al. Prognostic significance of day-by-day variability of home blood pressure on progression to macroalbuminuria in patients with diabetes. J Hypertens. 2018;36:1068–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003;26(Suppl 1):S5–20.

  10. Coleman A, Freeman P, Steel S, Shennan A. Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2006;11:27–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Imai Y, Kario K, Shimada K, Kawano Y, Hasebe N, Matsuura H, et al. Japanese Society of Hypertension Committee for Guidelines for Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure at Home. The Japanese society of hypertension guidelines for self-monitoring of blood Pressure at home (second edition). Hypertens Res. 2012;35:777–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yasuda H, Sanada M, Kitada K, Terashima T, Kim H, Sakaue Y, et al. Rationale and usefulness of newly devised abbreviated diagnostic criteria and staging for diabetic polyneuropathy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77(Suppl 1):S178–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maruhashi T, Kinoshita Y, Kajikawa M, Kishimoto S, Matsui S, Hashimoto H, et al. Relationship between home blood pressure and vascular function in patients receiving antihypertensive drug treatment. Hypertens Res. 2019;42:1175–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci. 2001;101:671–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, Sattar N, Eliasson B, Svensson A-M, et al. Risk factors, mortality, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:633–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Obara F, Saitoh S, Takagi S, Shimamoto K. Influence of Hypertension on the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in Two Rural Communities in Japan: The Tanno-Sobetsu [Corrected] Study. Hypertens Res. 2007;30:677–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. SPRINT Research Group, Wright JT Jr, Williamson JD, Whelton PK, et al. A randomized trial of intensive versus standard blood-pressure control. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ACCORD Study Group, Cushman WC, Evans GW, Byington RP, Goff DC Jr, Grimm RH Jr, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2103–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bangalore S, Kumar S, Lobach I, Messerli FH. Blood pressure targets in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus/impaired fasting glucose: observations from traditional and bayesian random-effects meta-analyses of randomized trials. Circulation. 2011;123:2799–810.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ueki K, Sasako T, Okazaki Y, Kato M, Okahata S, Katsuyama H, et al. J-DOIT3 Study Group. Effect of an intensified multifactorial intervention on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes (J-DOIT3): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:951–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Eguchi K, Hoshide S, Ishikawa S, Shimada K, Kario K. Aggressive blood pressure-lowering therapy guided by home blood pressure monitoring improves target organ damage in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes/prediabetes. J Clin Hypertens. 2012;14:422–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Noguchi Y, Asayama K, Staessen JA, Inaba M, Ohkubo T, Hosaka M.HOMED-BP study group et al. Predictive power of home blood pressure and clinic blood pressure in hypertensive patients with impaired glucose metabolism and diabetes. J Hypertens. 2013;31:1593–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Umemura S, Arima H, Arima S, Asayama K, Dohi Y, Hirooka Y, et al. The Japanese society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension (JSH 2019). Hypertens Res. 2019;42:1235–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Appel LJ, Wright JT, Jr., Greene T, Agodoa LY, Astor BC, Bakris GL. AASK Collaborative Research Group. et al. Intensive blood-pressure control in hypertensive chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:918–29 .

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsumoto S, Fukui M, Hamaguchi M, Ushigome E, Matsushita K, Fukuda T, et al. Is home blood pressure reporting in patients with type 2 diabetes reliable? Hypertens Res. 2014;37:741–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao W, Katzmarzyk PT, Horswell R, Wang Y, Li W, Johnson J, et al. Aggressive blood pressure control increases coronary heart disease risk among diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3287–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr. Atsushi Omoto and Dr. Wataru Fukuda of Kyoto First Red Cross Hospital, Dr. Shin-ichi Mogami and Dr. Yoshihiro Kitagawa of Osaka General Hospital of West Japan Railway Company for their assistance in collecting data. We would like to thank Naoko Higo, Machiko Hasegawa and Terumi Kaneko at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine for teaching the patients how to measure their BP and Sayoko Tanaka, also at the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, for her secretarial assistance. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

Funding

EU received grant support from the Japanese Study Group for Physiology and Management of Blood Pressure and the Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders (Grant number: 4024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emi Ushigome.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

EU received grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and received personal fees from AstraZeneca plc; Astellas Pharma Inc.; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Company Ltd.; KOWA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD.; MSD K.K.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.; Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd.; Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.; and Johnson & Johnson K.K. outside the submitted work. Masahide Hamaguchi received grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED; Sanofi K.K.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Astellas Pharma Inc.; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.; Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd.; and Eli Lilly Japan K.K. Masahide Hamaguchi also received personal fees from ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; AstraZeneca plc; KOWA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD.; MSD K.K.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp.; and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd. outside the submitted work. Masahiro Yamazaki received personal fees from MSD K.K.; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.; Kowa Company, Ltd.; AstraZeneca PLC; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd.; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED; KOWA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD.; and ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. outside the submitted work. Michiaki Fukui received grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.; KISSEI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED; Sanofi K.K.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Astellas Pharma Inc.; MSD K.K.; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.; KOWA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD.; Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd.; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; SANWA KAGAKU KENKYUSHO CO., LTD.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; TERUMO CORPORATION; TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED; Nippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd.; and Johnson & Johnson k.k. Medical Company. Michiaki Fukui also received honoraria from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.; KISSEI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation; DAIICHI SANKYO COMPANY, LIMITED; Sanofi K.K.; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; Astellas Pharma Inc.; MSD K.K.; Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd.; Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd.; KOWA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD.; Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd.; ONO PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; SANWA KAGAKU KENKYUSHO CO., LTD.; Eli Lilly Japan K.K.; Taisho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.; Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd.; AstraZeneca K.K.; MOCHIDA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.; and Combi Corporation outside the submitted work. IY received speaking fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Japan Tobacco Inc. Pharmaceutical Division outside the submitted work. The sponsors were not involved in the study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of this manuscript; or in the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundations with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. The authors declare that although they are affiliated with a department that is supported financially by a pharmaceutical company, the authors received no current funding for this study, and their department affiliation does not alter their adherence to all the full journal policies on sharing data and materials.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ushigome, E., Kitagawa, N., Kitagawa, N. et al. Predictive power of home blood pressure measurement for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: KAMOGAWA-HBP study. Hypertens Res 44, 348–354 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-00584-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-020-00584-z

  • Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

Keywords

This article is cited by

Navigation