Abstract
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become the preferred therapy for unresectable advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the embolization of tumor-feeding arteries by TACE always leads to hypoxia-related tumor angiogenesis, which limited the therapeutic effect for HCC. In this paper, we used a VEGFR targeting peptide VEGF125 − 136 (QKRKRKKSRYKS) to conjugate with a lytic peptide (KLUKLUKKLUKLUK) to form a peptide-drug conjugate (PDC). We used cell affinity assay to detect the peptide binding ability to VEGFR highly expressed cell lines, and CCK8, cell apoptosis to confirm the cellular toxicity for different cell lines. Meanwhile, we created a VX2 tumor-bearing rabbit model to assess the in vivo anti-tumor effect of the peptide conjugate in combination with TAE. HE staining was used to verify the in vivo safety of the peptide conjugate. IHC was used to assess the anti-angiogenesis and cell toxicity of the peptide conjugate in tumor tissues. The peptide conjugate could not only target VEGFR in cell surface and inhibit VEGFR function, but also have potent anti-cancer effect. We luckily found the peptide conjugate showed potent cytotoxicity for liver cancer cell Huh7 (IC50 7.3 ± 0.74 μM) and endothelial cell HUVEC (IC50 10.7 ± 0.292 μM) and induced cell apoptosis of these two cell lines. We also found the peptide conjugate inhibited cell migration of HUVEC through wound healing assay. Besides, these peptides also showed better in vivo anti-tumor effect than traditional drug DOX through TACE in VX2 rabbit tumor model, and efficiently inhibit angiogenesis in tumor tissues with good safety. In conclusion, our work may provide an alternative option for clinical HCC therapy via TACE combination.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer worldwide [1], is characterized by a broad clinical and biological heterogeneity and is highly resistant to traditional therapy [2]. Unlike the surrounding hepatic parenchyma, liver tumor is preferentially vascularized by the hepatic artery rather than the portal vein. This difference in vascularisation makes it possible to selectively deliver drugs, embolic agents specifically to target tumor-feeding artery under the guidance of medical imaging equipment [3, 4]. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been confirmed the efficacy to prolong the survival of patients with HCC and recommended as the first-line treatment for unresectable HCC [1].
However, when TACE induces tumor necrosis, it can also aggravate hypoxia at the tumor site, which leads to upregulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), thus resulting in tumor-associated angiogenesis, tumor recurrence and metastasis [5, 6]. Therefore, anti-angiogenic therapy has attracted much attention after TACE procedure in liver tumors [7]. Currently, numerous therapeutic agents that target angiogenesis by blocking the VEGF signaling pathway have been developed, such as sorafenib, regorafenib, and others [8]. However, due to the lack of tumor specificity, oral-systemic administration of these anti-angiogenesis agents often lead to high toxicity and severe side effects [9]. Some researchers then proved that local administration through transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) not only inhibited tumor angiogenesis but also reduced the side effects of these anti- angiogenesis agents in animal models [10,11,12]. Thus, many methods have emerged to improve the therapeutic effect of TACE such as the application of different inhibitors to disrupt VEGF or HIF-1α signal pathways, or combination with novel nanomaterials to change the hypoxia environment [11,12,13,14]. Despite these discoveries, the effect of anti-angiogenesis and anti-tumor is limited, and it still requires new tools or therapeutic drugs to pave the way for HCC therapy.
In recent decades, peptides have emerged as a new modality for cancer therapy [15]. The anti-cancer peptides include peptide inhibitors targeting aberrant protein in tumor, proapoptotic peptides disrupting mitochondrial membrane, and lytic peptides destroying cell membrane [15,16,17]. Among these peptides, lytic peptides are the most toxic drugs towards various cells. Due to their non-specific toxicity, lytic peptides are usually delivered to tumor tissues through targeted delivery systems such as various nanoparticles [18, 19]. Unlike chemotherapeutics, lytic peptides kill cells through disrupting cell membrane, and are often used to overcome chemo-resistance of cancer cells [20, 21]. Thus, lytic peptides could be a useful complement to chemotherapy drugs. As we mentioned above, VEGF/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) signaling is primarily responsible for tumor angiogenesis and has been considered the principal target pathway for antiangiogenic therapy. Many VEGF or VEGFR targeting peptide inhibitors have been developed for anti-angiogenesis for cancer therapy [22,23,24]. VEGF125−136 (QKRKRKKSRYKS) was first identified as an effective inhibitor to VEGFR in 2001, which was later used as efficient radiotracers for imaging VEGFR in vivo [25,26,27]. Due to its high affinity for VEGFR, peptide VEGF125−136 can be used as a favorable VEGFR ligand conjugated with other toxic drugs to kill tumor cells with high expression level of VEGFR, like PDCs.
In this paper, we designed a novel PDC which was a conjugation of VEGFR targeting peptide VEGF125−136 and a lytic peptide. This novel peptide conjugate may not only target VEGFR expressed on endothelial cells and inhibit angiogenesis, but also potently inhibit cancer cell proliferation through destroying cell membrane. As its different mechanism from chemotherapeutics, this PDC has a good potential for chemo-resistance cancer therapy. We recognized this peptide could be a potential drug candidate delivered through TAE for HCC therapy. As we know, there has not been a peptide inhibitor used in combination with TACE for HCC therapy. So we developed a VX2 rabbit tumor model and applied this peptide conjugate to TAE for liver cancer therapy, in which this peptide demonstrated better in vivo anti-tumor and anti-angiogenesis effect than conventional TACE. This work may provide an alternative option in combination with TACE for HCC therapy in the future.
Results
Design of VEGFR targeting peptide conjugate
Anti-angiogenesis in tumor tissue has become a key strategy in the treatment of TACE. Besides small molecules, many peptide ligands also showed good binding affinity for VEGFR and have been widely used for anti-angiogenesis in tumor or radiotracers for malignant cancers [22,23,24]. In this paper, we chose a reported potent VEGFR peptide inhibitor VEGF125−136 (QKRKRKKSRYKS, named QR) to inhibit the interaction between VEGF and VEGFR [27]. However this peptide is not potent enough to inhibit cancer proliferation. Therefore, we selected a lytic peptide (KLUKLUKKLUKLUK, named KLU) [28] to conjugate with this VEGFR peptide ligand, called QR-KLU, shown as Fig. 1. This designed peptide could not only inhibit VEGFR signal pathway, but also inhibit tumor proliferation through non-specific membrane disruption. The designed peptide conjugates could be a novel and potent agent in combination with TAE for HCC therapy.
Cell affinity of QR-KLU peptide with endothelial cell
We then performed cell competitive binding assay to evaluate the affinity of the peptide conjugate to endothelial cell HUVEC with high expression of VEGFR [29]. FAM-labeled VEGF125−136 peptide QR was cultured with HUVEC cells for 4 h and then cellular penetration ability was tested by FACS. As shown in Fig. 2A, FAM labeled peptide QR showed potent cellular penetration with 0 μM peptide QR-KLU treatment, but with the increasing concentration of QR-KLU, FAM-labeled peptide QR showed decreased cell penetration ability. These results showed that QR-KLU could compete with VEGF peptide for the binding of VEGFR on cell surface under low concentration, which suggested the potent binding affinity of peptide QR-KLU to endothelial cell. To further confirm our result, we then used HT29 cells to repeat this assay as HT29 cells are reported with low expression of VEGFR [29]. We found FAM-labeled QR peptide displayed lower cell penetration in HT29 cells compared to HUVEC cells shown in Fig. 2B, C. Besides, different concentrations of QR-KLU peptide could not obviously affect cell penetration ability of FAM-labeled peptide QR. All these data suggested that QR-KLU peptide had superior affinity for endothelial cells which highly expressed VEGFR.
Cytotoxicity of the designed peptide conjugate
The effect of the peptide conjugate QR-KLU on the proliferation of Huh7 and HUVEC cells was assessed by CCK8 assays. First, we investigated anti-proliferation ability of three peptides QR, KLU and QR-KLU on Huh7 and HUVEC cells with different concentrations. As shown in Fig. 3A, B, cells were treated with QR peptide, KLU peptide, QR-KLU peptide, DOX with different concentration respectively. The inhibition rate increased in a dose-dependent manner in KLU and QR-KLU groups in both cell lines. In HUVEC cells, peptide QR-KLU (IC50 10.7 ± 0.292 μM) showed more potent inhibition effect than KLU (IC50 33.8 ± 0.98 μM), and in Huh7 cells, QR-KLU (IC50 7.3 ± 0.74 μM) also showed more potent anti-tumor effect than KLU (IC50 36.27 ± 2.7 μM). Meanwhile, peptide QR showed negligible toxicity even under 80 μM. As expect, DOX showed the most potent cellular toxicity in both cell lines (IC50 0.243 ± 0.076 μM in Huh7 cells and IC50 2.12 μM ± 0.72 μM in HUVEC cells). All these data demonstrated that QR-KLU held certain cytotoxicity in vitro. We then used wound healing assay to determine whether QR-KLU could influence the cell migration of HUVEC cells (Supplementary Fig. S1). The cell proliferation or migration of HUVEC was not affected by PBS or 80 μM QR. Meanwhile, when HUVEC was treated with 20 μM KLU or 10 μM QR-KLU, the wound epithelial gap was unchanged or even bigger, indicating these two peptides could inhibit cell migration of HUVEC. All these results demonstrated that our designed peptide conjugate QR-KLU could significantly inhibit cancer cell or endothelial cell proliferation.
Effect of QR-KLU on the cell apoptosis of Huh7 and HUVEC cells
The improved proapoptotic activity of QR-KLU was further confirmed by Annexin V-PI staining through FACS. Viable cells, early apoptotic cells, necrotic cells, late apoptotic cells were represented by Q4, Q3, Q2 and Q1 respectively. Peptide QR-KLU displayed a significant proapoptotic effect under 10 μM with apoptosis rate over 60% in Huh 7 cells and over 40% in HUVEC cells shown in Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S2. Besides, QR-KLU induced cell apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. However, peptide QR didn’t show obvious proapoptotic effect at 80 μM in both Huh 7 cells and HUVEC cells. The percentage of apoptotic cells in KLU peptide at 20 μM were about 25% in both Huh7 cells and HUVEC cells. In addition, all these peptides did not cause severe necrosis.
Tumor growth
One day before TAE procedure, the MR images showed that the VX2 rabbit tumor models were established successfully, and the mean tumor volumes in NS, DOX, KLU and QR-KLU groups were 930.7 ± 461.1, 889.0 ± 317.7, 991.8 ± 114.2, and 899.7 ± 394.0 mm3, respectively shown in Fig. 4A. And at 7 days after TAE procedure, the mean tumor volumes in the four groups were 2540.5 ± 1173.8, 1382.9 ± 563.7, 1321.4 ± 210.4, and 1008.5 ± 370.7 mm3, respectively. The tumor volume in NS group increased significantly, with an average growth rate of 276.4%, but the tumor growth rates of DOX, KLU and QR-KLU groups were significantly lower than that of the NS group (P values < 0.001) shown in Fig. 4B. Notably, the mean tumor growth rate of QR-KLU group was significantly lower than the other three groups (P values < 0.01), but no significant difference was found between the KLU group and the DOX group (P > 0.05).
Tumor necrosis, apoptosis and proliferation
Seven days after treatment, significant necrosis was observed in the DOX, KLU and QR-KLU groups from the gross specimens of tumors, but in NS group, the necrosis was not significant. Necrosis was measured via H&E staining, the mean tumor necrosis rates in NS, DOX, KLU and QR-KLU were 18.5% ± 5.7%, 81.4% ± 2.3, 79.5% ± 8.0% and 92.8% ± 3.9%, respectively shown in Fig. 5A. The mean necrosis rate of QR-KLU group was significantly higher than the other three groups shown in Fig. 5B (P values < 0.01).
TUNEL assay and Ki67 staining were used to evaluate tumor apoptosis and proliferation, respectively. As shown in Fig. 6, the mean proportion of apoptotic cells in DOX, KLU and QR-KLU groups was significantly higher than that in NS group (P values < 0.001), and the proportion was highest in QR-KLU group (P < 0.01). In addition, the mean proportion of proliferating cells in DOX, KLU and QR-KLU groups were significantly lower than that in NS group (P values < 0.001), and the proportion was lowest in QR-KLU group (P < 0.01).
Angiogenesis
Compared with the NS group, after the embolization of liver tumor using lipiodol-doxorubicin emulsion or lipiodol-KLU emulsion, the VEGF IHC score and MVD increased significantly (P values < 0.001), this is suggestive of the increase of tumor-associated neovascularization. However, the use of QR-KLU significantly reduced the expression of CD31 and VEGF in the hypoxic tumor tissue, which suggested that QR-KLU could significantly inhibit tumor neovascularization and reduce the MVD in the tumor shown in Fig. 6.
Therapeutic safety
In this study, we also assessed the toxicity of QR-KLU in rabbits. The mean body weight of rabbits in each group showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing, but the rabbits in NS group lost significantly more body weight than the other groups (Supplementary Fig. S3). the gross specimens and H&E staining of hearts, lungs, kidneys and spleens showed no apparent histopathological abnormality (tissue damage and/or inflammation) (Supplementary Figs. S4 and S5).
Subsequently, we analyzed the biochemical indicators of liver and renal function in tumor-bearing rabbits before and at 1, 3, and 7 days after treatment. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S6, no significant difference was found among the four groups in the liver and renal function indicators (ALT, AST, TBIL and CREA). This is suggestive of no significant liver or renal toxicity of QR-KLU and KLU.
Discussion
Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered as an important interventional therapeutic approach for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [30], and it is a minimally invasive procedure to deliver chemotherapeutic drugs and embolic materials to liver tumor through the feeding artery. Besides, TACE could avoid giving a high dose of drug via systemic drug administration, minimize off-target side effects and amplify anti-tumor activity [31,32,33]. However, the inhibiting effect of tumor progression after TACE is usually limited, most likely because hypoxic stress generated by embolization and the up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), eventually leading to neoangiogenesis and tumor recurrence [34,35,36,37]. Therefore, the application of anti-angiogenic agents could theoretically inhibit post-TACE neovascularization and decrease cancer relapse. Nowadays, multiple clinical trials have confirmed the good effect of the combination of TACE and oral anti-angiogenic agentsfor HCC therapy [38, 39]. However, the side effect of oral anti-angiogenic agents are also obvious in cancer patients. The local delivery of antiangiogenic agents via TAE might benefit patients with good therapeutic effect and safety. And many researches have proved that local delivery of antiangiogenic agents via TAE can inhibit in vivo tumor angiogenesis and tumor progression, which promote the development of therapeutic approaches for HCC [10,11,12].
Peptides have been widely used for cancer therapy with potent cellular toxicity. Due to the quite different anti-cancer mechanism from chemotherapeutics, lytic peptides have attracted much attention for chemo-resistant cancer therapy via local delivery systems [40, 41]. Besides, many lytic peptides were hybrided with target ligands to improve their selectivity for targeted cancer cells [42, 43]. Despite these lytic peptides are widely used for anti-cancer therapy, they have not been used in combination with TAE for HCC therapy. In this paper, we designed a dual functional peptide inhibitor (QR-KLU) with a conjugation of VEGFR targeting peptide VEGF125−136 and a reported lytic peptide. We evaluated the antineoplastic efficacy of peptide QR-KLU in vitro and in vivo. Peptide QR-KLU markedly inhibited the growth of Huh7 cells and HUVEC cells, and the inhibition effect was more potent than single lytic peptides (KLU). And the wound-healing assay showed that QR-KLU could effectively inhibit the HUVEC cell migration. The above results indicate that our designed peptide conjugates QR-KLU could significantly inhibit liver cell or endothelial cell proliferation. In addition, compared with single lytic peptides, peptide QR-KLU significantly promoted the apoptosis of Huh7 cells and HUVEC cells by flow cytometric analyses. In in vivo experiments, peptide QR-KLU also showed stronger anti-tumor activity in VX2 rabbit tumor model than the DOX group and more obvious tumor necrosis and apoptosis, which the necrosis rate of liver tumors reached 93%. We also found that QR-KLU group could decrease the expression of VEGF and CD31 further, confirming peptide QR-KLU could inhibit tumor angiogenesis. In addition, we studied the safety of peptide QR-KLU through H&E staining of hearts, lungs, kidneys and spleens, which showed no apparent tissue injury. And the biochemical indicators of liver and renal function did not show a significant difference between peptide QR-KLU group and NS group. Therefore, we believed that the use of peptide QR-KLU in combination with TAE is safe and feasible for HCC therapy.
In conclusion, Our research provides a new option for the TACE treatment of HCC. Compared with the conventional chemotherapeutic agents, peptide QR-KLU exhibits better anti-tumor activity and anti-angiogenesis effect, and has a favorable safety profile. Thus, peptide QR-KLU holds a promising application prospect in the TACE treatment of liver cancer and deserves further study.
Materials and methods
Peptide synthesis
The peptide synthesis was based on the solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) as we reported before [44]. Details of the synthesis of peptide inhibitors and their structure analysis were given in the Supplementary Fig. S7, and the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (MS) data of different peptide were shown in Supplementary Figs. S8–S11.
Tumor cell lines and culture
Human liver cancer cell lines, Huh7 cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human colon cancer cell HT29 were cultured in dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin/streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL). All reagents were purchased from Gibco. All these cells were were routinely tested for mycoplasma contamination and tested negative and maintained in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
Cell viability assay
Cell viability for different cell lines were measured by cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) assays. The cells were incubated on a 96-well plate for 24 h in growth medium prior to drug treatment. Then the medium was removed followed by adding different concentrations of peptides in medium with 5% FBS (v/v) for 48 h’ incubation, replaced by 10% FBS medium for another 24 h, if necessary, as mentioned in other studies [44, 45]. Then CCK8 (10 μL) was added and the cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Absorbance was measured with a microplate reader (Bio-Rad) at a wavelength of 450 nm.
Cell affinity assay
The affinity ability of peptide QR-KLU to endothelial cells was determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Briefly, the HUVEC cells were incubated on a 24-well plate for 24 h in growth medium. Then peptide QR-KLU in medium with different concentrations (0 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM, 20 μM) were respectively incubated with HUVEC cells for 30 min at 37 °C. Next, carboxy-fluorescein (FAM)-labelled-QR peptide (10 μM) were added to each well for 4 h at 37 °C. Fluorescent labeling methods have been described in previously published articles [23, 46]. After incubation, the cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and washed twice with PBS. The cell pellet was then resuspended in 0.5 mL of PBS. FACS was performed and the results were analyzed using FlowJo.
Cell apoptosis assay
The apoptosis assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using an Annexin V: Fluorescein Isothiocyanate (FITC) Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen™). Briefly, Huh 7 or HUVEC cells were seeded in a 12-well plate and allowed to grow for 24 h in medium with 10% FBS. Then, the cells were treated with the different peptides in medium with 5% FBS for 24 h’ incubation. The cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA, washed twice with PBS and suspended in 1 × binding buffer. The suspended cells were treated with FITC-labeled Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) as the protocol indicated and then analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the apoptotic cells. The cells with positive fluorescence intensity signals for both FITC and PI were used for the apoptotic cell count.
Wound-healing assay of HUVEC cells
Wound-healing assay was performed according to the protocols reported by Liang et al. [47]. Briefly, HUVEC cells were plated into 12-well plate and grown to create a confluent monolayer. The monolayer was grazed in a straight line to create a “scratch” with a pipette tip. Markings were created close to the scratch to be used as reference points. Then cells were treated with different peptides for 24 h at 37 °C. Images were collected with a Leica DFC480 camera on a phase-contrast microscope equipped with a 10 × objective at room temperature. The free area of the wound was measured by image software.
VX2 rabbit tumor model
New Zealand white rabbits (2.5–3 kg) were purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China). All the animal experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Blinding was not possible in most animal experiments.
The rabbit VX2 liver tumor model was established according to the method reported by Qian K et al. [48]. In brief, after the rabbit was fully anesthetized, the abdominal cavity was cut open along the abdominal midline below the xiphoid, then a prepared VX2 tumor particle (volume: 1 mm3) was embedded in the left liver lobe. The growth of VX2 tumor in rabbit liver lobe was evaluated using a 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) system (Ingenia CX, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with an eight-channel phased-array small flexible coil (ds SmallExtr 8ch, Invivo Corporation, Avenue Gainesville, USA). The acquisition parameters of the sequence are as follows: T2WI, TR 2750 ms, TE 65 ms, the field of view 120 mm × 120 mm, Slice thickness 3 mm in the transverse plane, matrix 152 × 152. The multi-vane technique was used to reduce artifacts and improve image quality, acquisition time 3 min 202 s; T1WI 3D Fast field echo sequence with the multi-vane technique, TR 3.3 ms, TE 1.38 ms, the field of view 120 mm × 120 mm, Slice thickness 3 mm in transverse plane, matrix 152 × 152, acquisition time 3 min 20 s.
Groups and TACE procedure
Twenty-four VX2 tumor-burdened rabbits were evenly divided into four groups. After fasting for 12 h, the rabbits were anesthetized by intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium solution (2 wt.%, 30 mg/kg). The rabbit’s right femoral artery was dissected and a 4-F Cobra catheter (Cook, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana) was inserted into the celiac artery, hepatic arteriography was then performed under the guidance of digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and a 2.7-F coaxial microcatheter (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan) was super-selectively inserted into the tumor donor branch subsequently. The emulsion of drugs and lipiodol were slowly injected into the tumor-feeding artery through the above microcatheter at a speed of 0.5 mL/min. Each group was injected as follows: negative saline (NS) group (0.5 mL saline); DOX group (0.5 mL lipiodol-doxorubicin emulsion); KLU group (0.5 mL lipiodol-KLU emulsion); QR-KLU group (0.5 mL lipiodol-[QR-KLU] emulsion). The dose of DOX (molecular weight [MW]: 543.52 g/mol), KLU (MW: 1621.18 g/mol) and QR-KLU (MW: 3309.25 g/mol) were 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg, respectively. After obtaining all DSA images, the sheaths and catheters were removed. The femoral artery was ligated, the muscle, subcutaneous tissue and skin were sutured, and penicillin (20,000 IU/day) was injected intramuscularly for 3 days to prevent infection (Supplementary Fig. S12).
Seven days after TACE procedure, tumor size was evaluated again by MR scan and the tumor volume was calculated by formula: V = a * b2/2 (a, long diameter; b, short diameter). And tumor growth rate was calculated by formula: V7/V0 × 100% (V0 and V7 represent the tumor volume at baseline and 7 days after treatment, respectively). Finally, the VX2 rabbits were sacrificed and the tumor tissues were harvested for biochemical analysis and histopathological examination.
Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Seven days after treatment, the liver tumors, hearts, lungs, kidneys and spleens were harvested and fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered paraformaldehyde, the specimens were embedded in paraffin blocks and cut into 5‐μm‐thick sections. Following the manufacturer’s guidelines, the sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for the evaluation of organ toxicity and tumor necrosis, Ki-67 staining and transfer-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) technique were used to detect tumor proliferation and apoptosis, respectively.
The IHC staining procedures were performed as previously described [49]. Briefly, the sections were blocked in 3% H2O2 for 25 min and then incubated with goat serum for 15 min. Subsequently, the sections were first washed and incubated with anti-VEGF (1:200, Abcam, USA), and anti-CD31 (1:20; Abcam, USA) overnight at 4 °C, and then incubated with second antibody (Abcam, USA) at 37 °C for 50 min. Next, the sections were stained with 3, 3ʹ-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Service bio, Wuhan Saiwell Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China) for 6 min and rinsed and stained in hematoxylin for 30 s. The sections were then dehydrated in gradient alcohol and sealed in neutral resins.
VEGF expression was assessed by semiquantitative IHC based on staining intensity and density, the staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (strong), while the staining density was scored on the basis of the percentage of positively stained cells: 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26–50%), 3 (51–75%), and 4 (76–100%). The total VEGF IHC score was calculated by multiplying the intensity score by the density score [50]. Microvessel density (MVD) was calculated according to the method developed by Weidner et al. [51], the CD31-stained endothelial cells or cell clusters could be considered as a microvessel, the microvessels were counted at three high magnification fields (×200 magnification) and the final result was the mean value of three fields.
Serum biochemical analysis
Blood samples were collected before treatment and at 1, 3, 7 days after treatment. The blood samples were stood at room temperature for 30 min, and the serum was obtained by centrifugation (room temperature, 8000 rpm, 10 min) for assessment of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL) and creatinine (CREA). The assays were performed using the commercially ready-made kits following the manufacturers’ instructions.
Statistical analysis
Data processing and analyses were performed by using IBM SPSS statistics version 22.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL). All data were expressed as the means ± standard deviations (SDs), and differences were compared using One-Way ANOVA. P < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant difference. GraphPad Prism V8.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), 3D Studio Max software (Discreet Logic, Montreal, Canada) and Figdraw (Home for researchers, Hangzhou, China) were used for graphical presentations.
Data availability
The corresponding author will provide the original data used to support the findings of this study upon reasonable request.
References
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.
Wörns MA, Galle PR. HCC therapies–lessons learned. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 ;11:447–52.
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2018;391:1301–14.
Forner A, Gilabert M, Bruix J, Raoul JL. Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:525–35.
Morse MA, Sun W, Kim R, He AR, Abada PB, Mynderse M, et al. The role of angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:912–20.
Ronald J, Nixon AB, Marin D, Gupta RT, Janas G, Chen W, et al. Pilot evaluation of angiogenesis signaling factor response after transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology 2017;285:311–8.
Palazon A, Tyrakis PA, Macias D, Veliça P, Rundqvist H, Fitzpatrick S, et al. An HIF-1α/VEGF-A axis in cytotoxic T cells regulates tumor progression. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:669.e5.
Rapisarda A, Melillo G. Role of the VEGF/VEGFR axis in cancer biology and therapy. Adv Cancer Res. 2012;114:237–67.
Vasudev NS, Reynolds AR. Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: current progress, unresolved questions and future directions. Angiogenesis 2014;17:471–94.
Kim GM, Kim MD, Kim do Y, Kim SH, Won JY, Park SI, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization using sorafenib in a Rabbit VX2 Liver Tumor Model: pharmacokinetics and antitumor effect. J Vasc Inter Radio. 2016;27:1086–92.
Zhou C, Shi Q, Liu J, Huang S, Yang C, Xiong B. Effect of inhibiting tumor angiogenesis after embolization in the treatment of HCC with apatinib-loaded p(N-Isopropyl-Acrylamide-co-Butyl Methyl Acrylate) temperature-sensitive nanogel. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2020;7:447–56.
Shi Q, Lu Y, Huang S, Zhou C, Yang C, Liu J, et al. Apatinib-loaded CalliSpheres Beads for embolization in a rabbit VX2 liver tumor: characterization in vitro, pharmacokinetics and tumor response in vivo. Drug Deliv. 2020;27:1301–7.
Li X, Yu H, Huang Y, Chen Y, Wang J, Xu L, et al. Preparation of microspheres encapsulating sorafenib and catalase and their application in rabbit VX2 liver tumor. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;129:110512.
Li L, Liu Y, Li H, Guo X, He X, Geng S, et al. Rational design of temperature-sensitive blood-vessel-embolic nanogels for improving hypoxic tumor microenvironment after transcatheter arterial embolization. Theranostics 2018;8:6291–306.
Cooper BM, Iegre J, O’ Donovan DH, Ölwegård Halvarsson M, Spring DR. Peptides as a platform for targeted therapeutics for cancer: peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs). Chem Soc Rev. 2021;50:1480–94.
Wang J, Qian Y, Xu L, Shao Y, Zhang H, Shi F, et al. Hyaluronic acid-shelled, peptide drug conjugate-cored nanomedicine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;117:111261.
Xie M, Liu D, Yang Y. Anti-cancer peptides: classification, mechanism of action, reconstruction and modification. Open Biol. 2020;10:200004.
Jia HR, Zhu YX, Xu KF, Wu FG. Turning toxicants into safe therapeutic drugs: cytolytic peptide-photosensitizer assemblies for optimized in vivo delivery of melittin. Adv Health Mater. 2018;7:e1800380.
Gajski G, Garaj-Vrhovac V. Melittin: a lytic peptide with anticancer properties. Environ Toxicol Pharm. 2013;36:697–705.
Ishikawa K, Medina SH, Schneider JP, Klar AJS. Glycan alteration imparts cellular resistance to a membrane-lytic anticancer peptide. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24:149–58.
Cardoso MH, Meneguetti BT, Costa BO, Buccini DF, Oshiro KGN, Preza SLE, et al. Non-Lytic antibacterial peptides that translocate through bacterial membranes to act on intracellular targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4877.
Wang Z, Li Y, Xing L, Sun F, Yang Z, Wang F, et al. Effects of the anti-angiogenic carbohydrate-peptide conjugate, chitooligosaccharide-ES2 on endothelial cells and tumor-bearing mice. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;208:302–13.
Sun F, Yu Y, Yang Z, Wang Z, Li Y, Wang F, et al. Hyaluronic acid-endostatin2-alft1 (HA-ES2-AF) nanoparticle-like conjugate for the target treatment of diseases. J Control Release. 2018;288:1–13.
Oh EJ, Park K, Choi JS, Joo CK, Hahn SK. Synthesis, characterization, and preliminary assessment of anti-Flt1 peptide-hyaluronate conjugate for the treatment of corneal neovascularization. Biomaterials 2009;30:6026–34.
Jia H, Jezequel S, Löhr M, Shaikh S, Davis D, Soker S, et al. Peptides encoded by exon 6 of VEGF inhibit endothelial cell biological responses and angiogenesis induced by VEGF. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;283:164–73.
Hu K, Shang J, Xie L, Hanyu M, Zhang Y, Yang Z, et al. PET Imaging of VEGFR with a Novel 64Cu-Labeled Peptide. ACS Omega. 2020;5:8508–14.
Qin ZX, Li QW, Liu GY, Luo CX, Xie GF, Zheng L, et al. Imaging targeted at tumor with (188)Re-labeled VEGF(189) exon 6-encoded peptide and effects of the transfecting truncated KDR gene in tumor-bearing nude mice. Nucl Med Biol. 2009;36:535–43.
Zhao H, Qin X, Yang D, Jiang Y, Zheng W, Wang D, et al. The development of activatable lytic peptides for targeting triple negative breast cancer. Cell Death Disco. 2017;3:17037.
Rezazadeh F, Sadeghzadeh N, Abedi SM, Abediankenari S. 99mTc labeled D(LPR): A novel retro-inverso peptide for VEGF receptor-1 targeted tumor imaging. Nucl Med Biol. 2018;62-63:54–62.
Raoul JL, Forner A, Bolondi L, Cheung TT, Kloeckner R, de Baere T. Updated use of TACE for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: How and when to use it based on clinical evidence. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;72:28–36.
Sacco R, Tapete G, Simonetti N, Sellitri R, Natali V, Melissari S, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2017;4:105–10.
Makary MS, Khandpur U, Cloyd JM, Mumtaz K, Dowell JD. Locoregional therapy approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and management strategies. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:1914.
Kishore SA, Bajwa R, Madoff DC. Embolotherapeutic strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma: 2020 Update. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:791.
Huang M, Wang L, Chen J, Bai M, Zhou C, Liu S, et al. Regulation of COX-2 expression and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition by hypoxia-inducible factor-1α is associated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients post TACE surgery. Int J Oncol. 2016;48:2144–54.
Sergio A, Cristofori C, Cardin R, Pivetta G, Ragazzi R, Baldan A, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): the role of angiogenesis and invasiveness. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:914–21.
Duran R, Namur J, Pascale F, Czuczman P, Bascal Z, Kilpatrick H, et al. Vandetanib-eluting radiopaque beads: pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy in a rabbit model of liver cancer. Radiology 2019;293:695–703.
Shim JH, Park JW, Kim JH, An M, Kong SY, Nam BH, et al. Association between increment of serum VEGF level and prognosis after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2037–44.
Park JW, Koh YH, Kim HB, Kim HY, An S, Choi JI, et al. Phase II study of concurrent transarterial chemoembolization and sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1336–42.
Pawlik TM, Reyes DK, Cosgrove D, Kamel IR, Bhagat N, et al. Phase II trial of sorafenib combined with concurrent transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3960–7.
Sakamoto K, Akishiba M, Iwata T, Murata K, Mizuno S, Kawano K, et al. Optimizing charge switching in membrane lytic peptides for endosomal release of biomacromolecules. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59:19990–8.
Miller SE, Tsuji K, Abrams RPM, Burke TR Jr, Schneider JP. Uncoupling the folding-function paradigm of lytic peptides to deliver impermeable inhibitors of intracellular protein–protein interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:19950–5.
Kohno M, Horibe T, Haramoto M, Yano Y, Ohara K, Nakajima O, et al. A novel hybrid peptide targeting EGFR-expressing cancers. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:773–83.
Yang L, Horibe T, Kohno M, Haramoto M, Ohara K, Puri RK, et al. Targeting interleukin-4 receptor α with hybrid peptide for effective cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11:235–43.
Wang D, Li W, Zhao R, Chen L, Liu N, Tian Y, et al. Stabilized peptide HDAC inhibitors derived from HDAC1 substrate H3K56 for the treatment of cancer stem-like cells in vivo. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1769–83.
Xie M, Zhao H, Liu Q, Zhu Y, Yin F, Liang Y, et al. Structural basis of inhibition of ERα-coactivator interaction by high-affinity N-terminus isoaspartic acid tethered helical peptides. J Med Chem. 2017;60:8731–40.
Li F, Jiang S, Zu Y, Lee DY, Li Z. A tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based high-affinity PET radiopharmaceutical targets vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1525–31.
Liang CC, Park AY, Guan JL. In vitro scratch assay: a convenient and inexpensive method for analysis of cell migration in vitro. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:329–33.
Qian K, Ma Y, Wan J, Geng S, Li H, et al. The studies about doxorubicin-loaded p(N-isopropyl-acrylamide-co-butyl methylacrylate) temperature-sensitive nanogel dispersions on the application in TACE therapies for rabbit VX2 liver tumor. J Control Release. 2015;212:41–9.
Zhang X, Dai F, Chen J, Xie X, Xu H, Bai C, et al. Antitumor effect of curcumin liposome after transcatheter arterial embolization in VX2 rabbits. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20:642–52.
Hu Z, Gu X, Zhong R, Zhong H. Tumor-infiltrating CD45RO+ memory cells correlate with favorable prognosis in patients with lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:2089–99.
Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis–correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N. Engl J Med. 1991;324:1–8.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all colleagues for helping us during the current study.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81873917 and 22007033).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BX and YZ designed the research study; DW, JL, TL, YW, XL and YB performed the research; CW, SJ, SH, CY and CZ analyzed and interpreted the data; DW and JL wrote the manuscript; BX and YZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, D., Liu, J., Li, T. et al. A VEGFR targeting peptide-drug conjugate (PDC) suppresses tumor angiogenesis in a TACE model for hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. Cell Death Discov. 8, 411 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-022-01198-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-022-01198-9
- Springer Nature Limited