Abstract
Inhibitory PAS domain protein (IPAS) is a bifunctional protein that acts as a transcriptional repressor in hypoxia and as a pro-apoptotic protein involved in neuronal cell death. Npas4 (NXF or LE-PAS) is a transcriptional factor that protects nerve cells from endogenous and foreign neurotoxins. Here we show that IPAS and Npas4 antagonize each other through their direct interaction. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments revealed that multiple binding sites on each protein were involved in the interaction. CoCl2 treatment of PC12 cells that induces IPAS repressed the transactivation activity of Npas4, and IPAS siRNA treatment reduced the CoCl2-induced repression. CoCl2-induced apoptosis was suppressed by the addition of KCl that induces Npas4. The protective effect of KCl was attenuated by siRNA-mediated gene silencing of Npas4. Npas4 and IPAS proteins were induced and localized in the cytoplasm of the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta after 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) treatment. Npas4−/− mice exhibited greater sensitivity to MPTP in nigral dopaminergic neurons. Together, these results strongly suggest that neuroprotective activity of Npas4 was, at least partly, exerted by inhibiting the pro-apoptotic activity of IPAS through direct interaction.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Inhibitory PAS domain protein (IPAS) was originally found as a negative regulator of HIF-1 [1], a master transcriptional regulator of numerous genes under hypoxic conditions [2]. HIF-1 is composed of an oxygen-dependent HIF-1α subunit and a constitutive Arnt (HIF-1β) subunit [3, 4]. Both HIF-1α and Arnt are protein family members that are characterized by a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) motif and two PAS (PAS A and PAS B) domains, both of which are required for their dimerization. IPAS is a splicing variant of HIF-3α, which shows sequence similarity to HIF-1α in the bHLH and PAS domains. IPAS contains the same bHLH sequence as that of HIF-3α and one PAS A-like domain modified by alternative splicing, but lacks the PAS B domain [5]. IPAS represses HIF-1 transactivation activity by directly interacting with HIF-1α and abrogating its DNA binding activity.
We found that IPAS was upregulated by CoCl2-induced oxidative stress and cytokines through activation of the classical NF-κB pathway in rat pheochromocytoma PC12 cells, resulting in suppression of HIF-1 [6, 7]. Besides the transcriptional suppression function in the nucleus, IPAS could localize to mitochondria, and form a pro-apoptotic complex with Bcl-xL and its related proteins in the process of CoCl2-induced apoptosis [8, 9]. This pro-apoptotic activity of IPAS was also demonstrated in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Furthermore, activation of PINK1 and Parkin, both proteins are associated with early onset autosomal recessive PD, reduced IPAS-dependent apoptosis by ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation of IPAS [10].
Npas4 (also referred to as NXF or LE-PAS) also belongs to the bHLH-PAS family of transcription factors, and forms a heterodimer preferentially with Arnt2, a neuron-specific homologue of Arnt, although it is able to dimerize with Arnt [11, 12]. These dimers bind to a conserved DNA element located in the regulatory region of many target genes [13, 14]. Npas4 is found to be a neuron-specific immediate-early gene, and shows activity dependent expression [15,16,17]. Recent studies have revealed that Npas4 is involved in diverse neural functions such as regulation of synapses, plasticity in neural circuits, and formation of memories [18,19,20,21].
In addition, Npas4 acts as an inducible neuroprotective factor in various aspects of neurodegeneration. Npas4 was strongly induced in ischemic tissues following both focal and global cerebral ischemic insults, and this induction of Npas4 was attributed to its ability to protect neurons against toxicity of reactive oxygen species [22, 23]. Npas4 gene null (Npas4−/−) mice exhibited no apparent abnormality at young age. However, a small percent of them started to die when over 3 months old due to degeneration of neurons in various regions of the brain including hippocampus and cerebral cortex [13, 24]. The molecular mechanisms by which Npas4 protects neurons from a variety of neurotoxins were not fully understood. Attempts to identify subordinate genes required for protection were made [25].
In this study, we demonstrate that IPAS and Npas4 physically interact with each other, and mutually repress their biological activities in cultured cells. Transactivation activity of Npas4 was repressed by the expression of IPAS, whereas pro-apoptotic activity of IPAS was attenuated by Npas4. Nigral dopaminergic neurons were more profoundly degenerated by the administration of MPTP in Npas4−/− mice. Npas4 and IPAS were simultaneously induced in the cytoplasm of SNpc dopaminergic neurons by the treatment, strongly suggesting that the neuronal cell-protective activity of Npas4 was at least partly attributed to direct interaction with IPAS.
Results
Interaction between IPAS and Npas4
We investigated direct interaction between Myc-IPAS and FLAG-Npas4 that were overexpressed in HEK293T cells. Coimmunoprecipitation assays clearly showed that the two tagged proteins could bind to each other (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, Npas4 was expressed in non-neuronal HEK293T cells as shown in Fig. 1B. This endogenous Npas4 also interacted with FLAG-IPAS. Deletion analysis using IPAS mutants showed that Npas4-binding sites were localized in both the N- and C-terminal regions (Fig. 1C). Similarly, the binding activity of Npas4 to IPAS was localized in both the N- and C-terminal regions (Fig. 1D). Further deletions of the N-terminal segment of Npas4 strongly suggested that bHLH, PAS A, and PAS B domains, which are involved in dimerization with Arnt2, were used for binding to IPAS (Fig. 1E). The region between PAS A and PAS B showed weak repressive activity for binding. Deletion analysis of the C-terminal region demonstrated that a segment (amino acids 496-668) in the middle of the region possessed binding activity to IPAS (Fig. 1F).
Cerulean (a cyan variant of GFP) tagged-Npas4 (Cerulean-Npas4) showed a homogeneous distribution in transfected PC12 cells, and Citrine (a yellow variant of GFP)-IPAS also localized in both nucleus and cytoplasm (Fig. 2A). The subcellular distribution of Cerulean-Npas4 and Citrine-IPAS remained unchanged by coexpression of the two fluorescent fusion proteins (Fig. 2B). Citrine-IPAS N and Citrine-IPAS C were mainly localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively, in PC12 cells (Fig. 2A) and in HEK293T cells (Fig. 2C) as described [26]. When Cerulean-Npas4 was coexpressed with Citrine-IPAS N, Cerulean-Npas4 was predominantly localized in the nucleus together with IPAS N (Fig. 2B). In contrast, a large portion of transiently expressed Cerulean-Npas4 was colocalized with Citrine-IPAS C in the cytoplasm. Immunofluorescent staining of endogenous Npas4 in HEK293T cells showed that Npas4 was mainly localized in the nucleus (Fig. 2C). Although overexpression of EGFP or EGFP-IPAS N in the cells was unable to affect the localization of endogenous Npas4, expression of EGFP-IPAS C caused translocation of Npas4 into the cytoplasm in around 75% of cells expressing EGFP-IPAS C. Expression of EGFP-IPAS similarly induced cytoplasmic translocation of Npas4 in around 33% of cells expressing EGFP-IPAS (at least 100 cells were counted for each condition).
Effect of IPAS expression on transactivation activity of Npas4
The effect of IPAS expression on the transactivation activity of Npas4 was investigated using natural and synthetic promoters linked to the luciferase gene (Fig. 3A, B). When a luciferase reporter construct with the natural BDNF promoter I was introduced into PC12 cells together with a FLAG-Npas4 effector plasmid, luciferase activity was increased ~9.0-fold (Fig. 3A). The increased activity was repressed by the overexpression of Myc-IPAS in a dose dependent manner. Overexpression of either IPAS N or IPAS C appeared insufficient to repress the Npas4-dependent reporter activity although both truncated proteins possessed binding activity to Npas4 (Fig. 1C). Similarly, enhanced transactivation of the synthetic promoter by the expression of FLAG-Npas4 was attenuated by the coexpression of Myc-IPAS (Fig. 3B). Next, we investigated the effect of CoCl2 treatment, which induces IPAS as described [6] (Supplementary Fig. 1), on Npas4-induced reporter activity. The increased luciferase activity transactivated by Npas4 was reduced by CoCl2 treatment in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3C). This repression was counteracted by the knockdown of IPAS, suggesting that transactivation activity of Npas4 was inhibited by IPAS that was induced by the addition of CoCl2 (Fig. 3D).
Protection of PC12 cells by Npas4 against IPAS-induced apoptosis
In order to investigate the effect of Npas4 expression on the IPAS-induced apoptosis, EGFP-IPAS was coexpressed with Cerulean-Npas4 in PC12 cells. Expression of EGFP-IPAS caused caspase-3 activation and chromatin condensation in ~29% and 21%, respectively, of transfected cells (Fig. 4A and B). However, coexpression of Cerulean-Npas4 significantly reduced the proportion of cells expressing the apoptotic markers to 13% and 9.3%, respectively. Binding of Myc-IPAS to endogenous Bcl-xL was examined as an indication of pro-apoptotic activity of IPAS. The binding was significantly attenuated by the expression of FLAG-Npas4 (Fig. 4C). Treatment with CoCl2 for 16 h caused cytochrome c release from mitochondria to the cytosol in ~27% of treated cells, but concurrent KCl treatment considerably reduced the number of cells with cytochrome c release (Fig. 4D). CoCl2-induced activation of caspase-3, which is induced following cytochrome c release, was also attenuated by KCl treatment, but the extent of protection was significantly reduced by siRNA treatment against Npas4 (Fig. 4E). Time-dependent induction of IPAS and Npas4 mRNAs by CoCl2 and KCl, respectively, was shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. Interestingly, KCl treatment of PC12 cells weakly repressed CoCl2-induced expression of IPAS mRNA, suggesting that another IPAS repression mechanism that is independent of Npas4 expression may be present (Supplementary Fig. 1).
Effect of MPTP administration on Npas4−/− mice
Mice were intraperitoneally injected with MPTP (15 mg/kg body weight) twice at a 2-h interval, and total RNA was extracted from the brain 2 h after the second injection. Expression of Npas4 mRNA remained unchanged in the cerebrum and cerebellum after MPTP administration. On the other hand, the expression was induced in the midbrain ~3.2-fold (Fig. 5A), although the basal expression in the midbrain was relatively low when compared with cerebrum as reported previously [27]. Npas4 protein was also found to be induced by MPTP mainly in the cytoplasm of TH-positive neurons in the SNpc (Fig. 5B). Similar to Npas4, IPAS was induced by MPTP and found in the cytoplasm.
We previously reported that IPAS expression was responsible for dopaminergic neuronal cell death in the SNpc observed in an acute MPTP mouse model of PD [10]. Using the same model, we analyzed the functional role of Npas4 in MPTP-induced neurodegeneration. Male Npas4−/− mice (9–12 weeks old) were intraperitoneally administered with MPTP (15 mg/kg, 4 times, 2 h apart, the first injection was given at 10 A.M.), and TH-positive neurons in the SNpc were scored 72 h after the final injection (Fig. 5C). Administration of MPTP to control wild-type mice caused degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc as reported, but a more profound effect on the cell killing was observed in the Npas4−/− mice, suggesting the protective activity of Npas4 against the neurotoxin. Approximately 74% of dopaminergic neurons in the SNpc were lost due to MPTP toxicity in the Npas4−/− mice although only 49% of neurons died by the same treatment in wild-type mice.
Discussion
Since Npas4 has a domain arrangement similar to HIF-1α and is exclusively expressed in neuronal cells, we investigated direct interaction between IPAS and Npas4. Analysis of the interaction between the two proteins using deletion mutants strongly suggested that binding domains in Npas4 used for binding to its bHLH-PAS partners were also used for binding to IPAS. In addition, a central part in the C-terminal half of Npas4 was unexpectedly found to have the ability to bind to IPAS. On the other hand, both N- and C-terminal halves of IPAS were involved in the interaction. The C-terminal binding structure involved in binding to Bcl-xL [28] may be used for binding to Npas4 because competition between Bcl-xL and Npas4 for binding to IPAS was observed (Fig. 4C). This finding suggests that the C-terminal binding domain of IPAS could interact with different types of proteins with different structures.
Finding that IPAS can physically interact with Npas4 encouraged us to investigate functional consequences of the interaction because it implies that biological roles of IPAS in neuronal cell death are not only derived from interaction with Bcl-xL but also from binding to Npas4. The interaction repressed transactivation activity of Npas4, and this finding demonstrates pleiotropic functions of IPAS in neuronal cell death, inhibition of cell survival activity of Bcl-xL and suppression of Npas4 transactivation which plays a critical role in cell protection. Several studies reported that Npas4 possesses protective activity in neurons exposed to intracellular and extracellular stresses including excitotoxic stimulation, and the Npas4 gene is termed as one of “activity-regulated inhibitor of death” (AID) genes [15]. The neuron protective activity of Npas4 is also considered in neuronal diseases including ischemic stroke and epilepsy [22, 23, 29, 30]. In this study, it is suggested that nigral dopaminergic neurons were protected from MPTP-induced neurotoxicity in a PD model by the inducible expression of Npas4. To date, it is generally believed that the protective function of Npas4 results from its transactivation activity. A number of target genes was reported that were upregulated or downregulated by Npas4. Of these genes, BDNF and synaptotagmin 10 are selected and reported to act as protective factors against ischemia injury [31] and kainic acid-induced excitotoxicity [25], respectively. In addition to this transcription-dependent mechanism, this study strongly suggests that the protective function of Npas4 was induced by direct inhibitory interaction with IPAS, leading to reduced apoptosis of neurons. In relation to this, cytoplasmic localization of Npas4 was reported in various neurons including hippocampus and neocortex [29, 30]. Some fraction of Npas4 localized in the cytoplasm might play a role in cell survival by binding to IPAS to inhibit its pro-apoptotic activity. In addition to the neuron-protective function, Npas4 acts as a key factor involved in various neuronal functions including experience-dependent neuronal plasticity in the early developmental stage and in adult life [19, 21, 32]. Inhibitory interaction with IPAS, which is induced by hypoxic and oxidative stresses, may repress these functions of Npas4, suggesting that IPAS may mediate detrimental effects caused by hypoxia and reactive oxygen species on various neuronal activities through interaction with Npas4.
Molecular mechanism of repression of IPAS transcription by KCl is presently not known (Supplementary Fig. 1). We examined the repressive effect of Npas4 expression on IPAS promoter activity using reporter plasmids containing up to –8 kb upstream of the first ATG site of IPAS, but no transcriptional repression by Npas4 was found. This result suggests that Npas4, which is induced by KCl treatment, may not be involved in the repressive mechanism, and a more detailed analysis of the promoter region of the IPAS (HIF-3α) gene is necessary.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
Anti-mouse IPAS rabbit polyclonal antibody was produced as described previously [10]. Other antibodies used were obtained from the following sources: FLAG and TH from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), Myc from MBL (Nagoya, Japan), Bcl-xL from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA), cytochrome c from BD Pharmingen (San Jose, CA, USA), active-caspase-3 from Promega (Fitchburg, WI, USA), and Npas4 from LSBio (Seattle, WA, USA). IPAS siRNA and control siRNA were synthesized as described [28]. ON-TARGETplus rat Npas4 siRNA and non-targeting siRNA were obtained from GE Healthcare Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO, USA). MPTP and z-VAD-fmk were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and MBL, respectively.
Plasmid construction
Mouse IPAS and Npas4 cDNAs were kindly provided by Drs. Y. Makino and N. Ooe, respectively. pBOS-3Myc-IPAS, pEGFP-IPAS, pCitrine-IPAS and their deletion mutants were constructed as described [10, 28]. Npas4 deletion mutants were constructed by PCR using following primers: Npas4-N4-F, 5′-CGCAG ATCTG TCTTC TTTGC TGGAG GCACT-3′; Npas4-N5-F, 5′-CGCAG ATCTG CTCTG GATGC TGATC GCCTT-3′; Npas4-N-R, 5′-CGCAG ATCTT CAGTC ACTGA TAGGG TAGTT-3′; Npas4-N2-R, 5′-CGCAG ATCTT CAGAA GAGAG AAGCA GGACC-3′; Npas4-N3-R, 5′-CGCAG ATCTT CAAGA GGGCA TGGTG AGCTG-3′; Npas4-C-F, 5′-CGCAG ATCTA CGGAA GCCTG GAGCC TCCGC-3′; Npas4-C2-R, 5′-CGCAG ATCTT CATGA GCTTT CTGTC AACTG-3′; Npas4-C3-F, 5′-CGCAG ATCTG CCAGA AGCTT TGAAG ACCAG-3′; Npas4-C3-R, 5′-CGCAG ATCTT CACAG GGGCT CCAGC CCTCC-3′; and Npas4-C4-F, 5′-CGCAG ATCTA ACCCT AACCT GTCCC TGTCA-3′. pBOS-3FLAG-Npas4 was constructed by inserting the blunt-ended BspE I-Xho I fragment of pCerulean-Npas4 into the Hpa I site of pBOS-3FLAG vector, and deletion mutants of pBOS-3FLAG-Npas4 were similarly constructed. The reporter plasmid containing a natural BDNF promoter was constructed by inserting a PCR-amplified fragment corresponding to the –490 to 52 region of the mouse BDNF gene into the Kpn I/Xho I site of pGL3-Basic vector using primers, BDNF-P1-F, 5′-ACGCG GTACC TCTTT CCCCT CCTAG CCTAC ACCTT TTCG-3′ and BDNF-P1-R, 5′-GCACC TCGAG GAAGA CCGCT GGGGA ACTTG TTGCT TTTC-3′. The reporter plasmid containing two Npas4-binding sites was constructed by inserting synthetic nucleotides into the Nhe I/Bgl II site of pGL3-Promoter vector. The sequences of the nucleotides are as follows; 5′-CTAGC CTAGA AATTT GTTCG TGCCA CAGAC TAGAA ATTTG TTCGT GCCAC AGA A-3′ and 5′-GATCT TCTGT GGCAC GAACA AATTT CTAGT CTGTG GCACG AACAA ATTTC TAGG-3′. All constructions were validated by sequence analysis.
Cell culture and transfection
HEK293T and PC12 cells were obtained from the Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, and maintained as described previously [10, 28]. HEK293T and undifferentiated PC12 cells were transfected with plasmid DNA using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. PC12 cells were transfected with IPAS siRNA as described previously [28]. For deprivation of Npas4, PC12 cells were transfected with 20 nM ON-TARGETplus Non-targeting pool (D-001810-10-05, 5′-UGGUU UACAU GUCGA CUAA-3′; 5′-UGGUU UACAU GUUGU GUGA-3′; 5′-UGGUU UACAU GUUUU CUGA-3′; 5′-UGGUU UACAU GUUUU CCUA-3′) or ON-TARGETplus Rat Npas4 siRNA (SO-2471593G, 5′-GGUGA CAGUA UUUAC GACA-3′; 5′-GGAGA GUGUG AGCGA GCAU-3′; 5′-CAAGA ACAGC UGACG CCAA-3′; 5′-AGAAU GAGAU AGAUC GUCU-3′) using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The media were replaced 4 h later, and the cells were then treated with CoCl2 and/or KCl 48 h after the transfection.
RT-PCR
RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and PCR amplifying IPAS and 18 S rRNA were carried out as described previously [10]. Npas4 cDNA was amplified for 35 cycles with 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s, using following primers: Npas4-exon1-F, 5′-CAGTC ATGTA CCGAT CCACC AAG-3′; Npas4-exon2-R, 5′-CACTC TCCGA CAGGT ATAGC AAC-3′.
Immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting
HEK293T cells were transfected with various combinations of pBOS-3Myc-IPAS, pBOS-3FLAG-Npas4 and their deletion plasmids. Cell extracts were prepared 48 h after transfection and subjected to immunoprecipitation and immunoblotting as described [10]. To detect Npas4, blotted membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dried milk in PBS, incubated with anti-Npas4 antibody diluted 1:500 in Can Get Signal immunoreaction enhancer solution 1 (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) overnight at 4 °C, and signals were detected as described [10].
Luciferase assay
PC12 cells were inoculated on a polyethyleneimine-coated 24-well plate at 2 × 105 cells/well and cultured overnight. To assess Npas4 transactivation activity, cells were cotransfected with 0.1 µg pGL3 reporter plasmid, 0.1 µg pBOS-LacZ, 0.05 µg pBOS-3FLAG-Npas4, and 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 µg pBOS-3Myc-IPAS (the total amount of DNA was adjusted to 0.75 µg with a pBOS empty vector). Luciferase and β-galactosidase (a control for transfection efficiency) activities were analyzed 24 h later as described previously [8]. Since CoCl2 inhibits β-galactosidase activity, luciferase activity of cells treated with 50, 100, or 150 µM CoCl2 was normalized to the protein concentration for each sample.
Animals
Heterozygous Npas4 knockout mice (Npas4+/−) on a pure C57BL/6J background were kindly provided by Dr. Ooe. Male 9–12 weeks old C57BL/6J mice and Npas4-deficient mice were bred in a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at 23 °C. C57BL/6J mice used in Fig. 5A and B were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). Mice were intraperitoneally injected twice with 15 mg/kg MPTP or saline at a 2-h interval and sacrificed by inhalation of isoflurane 2 h after the second MPTP injection for analysis of Npas4 mRNA expression levels. Brains were removed when the animals were completely anaesthetized, and frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction. Removed brains were also fixed in formalin for immunohistochemical staining. Mice injected with MPTP (15 mg/kg) four times (2-h intervals) and sacrificed 18 h after the last injection were analyzed by immunofluorescent staining of IPAS and Npas4. Wild-type and Npas4−/− littermates used in Fig. 5C were produced by crossing Npas4+/− mice. Npas4−/− mice used in the experiments showed no behavioral abnormality reported previously [13]. Mice injected with MPTP (15 mg/kg) four times (2-h intervals) and killed 72 h after the last injection were analyzed by counting survived TH-positive neurons in the SNpc. All animal experiments were approved by the Committee for Animal Research of Tohoku University and performed in accordance with the Regulation for Animal Experiments and Related Activities as Tohoku University (Regulation No 122).
Immunofluorescent staining
PC12 cells were inoculated at 2.5 × 105 cells/well on collagen IV-coated coverslips in a 12-well plate and cultured overnight. Cells were transfected with 1.6 µg pCitrine-IPAS, pCerulean-Npas4 or 1:1 mixture of them. Culture media were replaced 4 h after the transfection, and cells were incubated for 24 h in the presence of 10 µM z-VAD-fmk, and stained with 0.4 µg/ml Hoechst 33342. Detection of caspase-3 activation, cytochrome c release and chromatin condensation in PC12 cells were carried out as described previously [28]. HEK293T cells, inoculated 1.5 × 105 cells/well on coverslips in a 12-well plate and cultured overnight, were transfected with 0.8 µg pEGFP-C1 or pEGFP-IPAS and fixed 24 h after transfection. Cells were blocked with 5% goat serum, and incubated overnight with anti-Npas4 antibody diluted 1:200 in 5% goat serum at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with Alexa fluor 594-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (1:250, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and DAPI (0.4 μg/ml) at room temperature for 1 h.
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded brain samples were subjected to immunofluorescence double staining of IPAS and TH as described [10]. For Npas4 and TH staining, deparaffinized sections were incubated in HistoVT One (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) at 90 °C for 20 min and blocked with 5% goat serum in PBS. Sections were incubated with a mixture of anti-Npas4 (1:200) and anti-TH (1:2000) antibodies overnight at 4 °C and then with Alexa fluor 488-conjugated anti-rabbit, 594-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies (1:250) and 0.4 μg/ml DAPI for 1 h. Samples were mounted with Mowiol and examined using a fluorescence microscope (Olympus IX71, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments. Multiple comparisons were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey–Kramer test.
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Makino Y, Cao R, Svensson K, Bertilsson G, Asman M, Tanaka H, et al. Inhibitory PAS domain protein is a negative regulator of hypoxia-inducible gene expression. Nature. 2001;414:550–4.
Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:39–56.
Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5510–4.
Wu D, Rastinejad F. Structural characterization of mammalian bHLH-PAS transcription factors. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2017;43:1–9.
Makino Y, Kanopka A, Wilson WJ, Tanaka H, Poellinger L. Inhibitory PAS domain protein (IPAS) is a hypoxia-inducible splicing variant of the hypoxia-inducible factor-3α locus. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:32405–8.
Torii S, Kobayashi K, Takahashi M, Katahira K, Goryo K, Matsushita N, et al. Magnesium deficiency causes loss of response to intermittent hypoxia in paraganglion cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:19077–89.
Goryo K, Torii S, Yasumoto KI, Sogawa K. Tumour necrosis factor-α suppresses the hypoxic response by NF-κB-dependent induction of inhibitory PAS domain protein in PC12 cells. J Biochem. 2011;150:311–8.
Torii S, Kurihara A, Li XY, Yasumoto K, Sogawa K. Inhibitory effect of extracellular histidine on cobalt-induced HIF-1alpha expression. J Biochem. 2011;149:171–6.
Kasai S, Kajimoto S, Ito Y, Saito T, Yasumoto K, Tokunaga M, et al. Conformational changes in inhibitory PAS domain protein associated with binding of HIF-1α and Bcl-xL in living cells. J Biochem. 2016;161:291–6.
Torii S, Kasai S, Suzuki A, Todoroki Y, Yokozawa K, Yasumoto K, et al. Involvement of inhibitory PAS domain protein in neuronal cell death in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Death Discov. 2015;1:15015.
Ooe N, Saito K, Mikami N, Nakatuka I, Kaneko H. Identification of a novel basic helix-loop-helix-PAS factor, NXF, reveals a Sim2 competitive, positive regulatory role in dendritic-cytoskeleton modulator drebrin gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:608–16.
Ooe N, Saito K, Oeda K, Nakatuka I, Kaneko H. Characterization of drosophila and caenorhabditis elegans NXF-like-factors, putative homologs of mammalian NXF. Gene 2007;400:122–30.
Ooe N, Motonaga K, Kobayashi K, Saito K, Kaneko H. Functional characterization of basic helix-loop-helix-PAS type transcription factor NXF in vivo putative involvement in an “on demand” neuroprotection system. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:1057–63.
Bloodgood BL, Sharma N, Browne HA, Trepman AZ, Greenberg ME. The activity-dependent transcription factor NPAS4 regulates domain-specific inhibition. Nature. 2013;503:121–5.
Zhang SJ, Zou M, Lu L, Lau D, Ditzel DAW, Delucinge-Vivier C, et al. Nuclear calcium signaling controls expression of a large gene pool: Identification of a gene program for acquired neuroprotection induced by synaptic activity. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000604.
Kim T-K, Hemberg M, Gray JM, Costa AM, Bear DM, Wu J, et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature. 2010;465:182–7.
Madabhushi R, Gao F, Pfenning AR, Pan L, Yamakawa S, Seo J, et al. Activity-induced DNA breaks govern the expression of neuronal early-response genes. Cell. 2015;161:1592–605.
Lin Y, Bloodgood BL, Hauser JL, Lapan AD, Koon AC, Kim T-K, et al. Activity-dependent regulation of inhibitory synapse development by Npas4. Nature. 2008;455:1198–204.
Maya-Vetencourt JF. Activity-dependent NPAS4 expression and the regulation of gene programs underlying plasticity in the central nervous system. Neural Plast.2013;2013:683909.
Sun X, Lin Y. Npas4: Linking neuronal activity to memory. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39:264–75.
Yoshihara SI, Takahashi H, Tsuboi A. Molecular mechanisms regulating the dendritic development of newborn olfactory bulb interneurons in a sensory experience-dependent manner. Front Neurosci. 2016;9:1–9.
Shamloo M, Soriano L, Von Schack D, Rickhag M, Chin DJ, Gonzalez-Zulueta M, et al. Npas4, a novel helix-loop-helix PAS domain protein, is regulated in response to cerebral ischemia. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24:2705–20.
Choy FC, Klarić TS, Koblar SA, Lewis MD. The role of the neuroprotective factor Npas4 in cerebral ischemia. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:29011–28.
Coutellier L, Beraki S, Ardestani PM, Saw NL, Shamloo M. Npas4: a neuronal transcription factor with a key role in social and cognitive functions relevant to developmental disorders. PLoS ONE.2012;7:e46604.
Woitecki AM, Muller JA, van Loo KM, Sowade RF, Becker AJ, Schoch S. Identification of synaptotagmin 10 as effector of NPAS4-mediated protection from excitotoxic neurodegeneration. J Neurosci. 2016;36:2561–70.
Torii S, Sakaki K, Otomo M, Saka K, Ysumoto K, Sogawa K. Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of IPAS by its unique nuclear import and export signals unshared with other HIF-3α splice variants. J Biochem. 2013;154:561–7.
Damborsky JC, Slaton GS, Winzer-Serhan UH. Expression of Npas4 mRNA in telencephalic areas of adult and postnatal mouse brain. Front Neuroanat. 2015;9:145.
Torii S, Goto Y, Ishizawa T, Hoshi H, Goryo K, Yasumoto K, et al. Pro-apoptotic activity of inhibitory PAS domain protein (IPAS), a negative regulator of HIF-1, through binding to pro-survival Bcl-2 family proteins. Cell Death Differ. 2011;18:1711–25.
Leong WK, Klaric TS, Lin Y, Lewis MD, Koblar SA. Upregulation of the neuronal Per-Arnt-Sim domain protein 4 (Npas4) in the rat corticolimbic system following focal cerebral ischemia. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37:1875–84.
Wang D, Ren M, Guo J, Yang G, Long X, Hu R, et al. The inhibitory effects of Npas4 on seizures in pilocarpine-induced epileptic rats. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115801.
Thomas K, Davies A. Neurotrophins: a ticket to ride for BDNF. Curr Biol. 2005;15:262–4.
Ye L, Allen WE, Thompson KR, Tian Q, Hsueh B, Ramakrishnan C, et al. Wiring and molecular features of prefrontal ensembles representing distinct experiences. Cell. 2016;165:1776–88.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. N. Ooe at Sumitomo Chemical for providing Npas4−/− mice and mouse Npas4 cDNA. We also thank T Iijima, K Takahashi, and S Motegi for their technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SK, ST, and KS planned experiments; SK, XL, and KY performed experiments; SK and KS analyzed data; and KS wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasai, S., Li, X., Torii, S. et al. Direct protein–protein interaction between Npas4 and IPAS mutually inhibits their critical roles in neuronal cell survival and death. Cell Death Discov. 7, 300 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00690-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-021-00690-y
- Springer Nature Limited